Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Aug;109(8):765–771. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109765

Comparison of gas-phase free-radical populations in tobacco smoke and model systems by HPLC.

T M Flicker 1, S A Green 1
PMCID: PMC1240402  PMID: 11564610

Abstract

We used an improved method for trapping carbon-centered radicals (.R) from the gas-phase to compare radical suites trapped from various tobacco smoke and model smoke systems. Using a nitroxide trap, 3-amino-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy (3AP), on solid support, we trapped radicals directly from the gas phase, washed them off the support, and analyzed them with HPLC. Separation of the trapped radicals showed that each tobacco type produced a unique radical suite of 4-10 distinct peaks. Gas mixtures used to model tobacco smoke consisted of nitric oxide, air, isoprene, and methanol. The model systems produced radical suites of four major and several minor peaks, two of which matched peaks in tobacco smoke chromatograms. Quantities of radicals trapped from tobacco smoke were: 54 +/- 2 nmol .R per Marlboro cigarette, 66 +/- 9 nmol .R per Djarum clove cigarette, and 185 +/- 9 nmol .R per Swisher Sweet cigar. In these experiments oxygen competes with the nitroxide trap for gas-phase radicals. A kinetic analysis of the O2 competition shows that actual radical concentrations in the smoke were approximately 100-fold higher than measured.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (120.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Church D. F., Pryor W. A. Free-radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and its toxicological implications. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Dec;64:111–126. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8564111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kieber D. J., Blough N. V. Fluorescence detection of carbon-centered radicals in aqueous solution. Free Radic Res Commun. 1990;10(1-2):109–117. doi: 10.3109/10715769009145940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lowry W. R., Peterson J., Petty C. S., Badgett J. L. Free radical production from controlled low-energy fires: toxicity considerations. J Forensic Sci. 1985 Jan;30(1):73–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pryor W. A. Biological effects of cigarette smoke, wood smoke, and the smoke from plastics: the use of electron spin resonance. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992 Dec;13(6):659–676. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90040-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pryor W. A., Prier D. G., Church D. F. Electron-spin resonance study of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke: nature of the free radicals in gas-phase smoke and in cigarette tar. Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Jan;47:345–355. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8347345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pryor W. A., Terauchi K., Davis W. H., Jr Electron spin resonance (ESR) study of cigarette smoke by use of spin trapping techniques. Environ Health Perspect. 1976 Aug;16:161–176. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7616161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES