Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0329483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329483

The relationship between artistic skills and academic engagement among artistically gifted non-specialist university students

Ghozeail Abdulaziz Abdullah Aldhorman 1,*
Editor: Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler2
PMCID: PMC12404549  PMID: 40892962

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the level of artistic skills and academic engagement among artistically gifted non-specialist students at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. It also attempted to identify the relationship between students’ artistic skills and academic engagement. The study followed a mixed methods design where both quantitative and qualitative data was collected and analyzed. The participating students (102 students enrolled in the university’s Gifted Care Unit) completed an author-developed questionnaire probing their artistic skills (cognitive, performance, and emotional) and academic engagement (vigor, dedication, and absorption). In addition to its 30 Likert scale items, the questionnaire had an open-ended question about ways to promote artistic skills from the perspective of the students. Furthermore, the author electronically interviewed 14 members of the Gifted Care Unit and got them to respond to the same open-ended question in the students’ questionnaire, i.e., what are your suggestions for promoting students’ artistic skills. The quantitative data analysis via descriptive statistics revealed that the students had high artistic skills and academic engagement. Pearson correlations revealed a significant positive relationship between artistic skills and academic engagement. Standard regression analysis produced a significant model where artistic skills explained 11% of variance in students’ academic engagement. Of the individual dimensions of artistic skills, only performance skills explained 13% of students’ academic engagement. The analysis of students’ and members’ responses to the open-ended question revealed some shared themes, e.g., the students’ need for more specialized training, contact with professional experiences, support from significant others, and creativity-stimulating competitiveness.. A number of implications are offered.

Conclusion

The important finding in this study is that ASs, especially performance skills, contribute to students’ AE. This makes it important for specialized entities like the Gifted Care Unit to exert more efforts to identify artistically gifted students in all university programs. These efforts can identify students who are aware of their artistic skills and students who have artistic skills but are unaware of them. The art culture should be spread all over the university to attract more students to join the Gifted Care Unit. The artistically gifted students should be provided with specialized training, contact with outside sources of artistic experience, an art-nurturing environment, incentives to be more creative, and support, especially spiritual support.

Introduction

Supporting gifted students is of great importance, and through a number of tailored educational experiences, these students can excel in their academic endeavors, develop their talents, and promote their innovation in areas such as arts. Fine arts represent a vital human activity. In the current era, many different arts have appeared that suit the inclinations of many young people, e.g., drawing, sculpture, ceramics, photography, and printing. These arts have attracted young people to learn them, and thus a generation of young people who are gifted in various fine arts emerged.

Giftedness is “an innate aptitude that the individual is born with” [1]. Gifted students are characterized by many distinctive abilities. They are distinguished by “a multiplicity and diversity of interests, a breadth of knowledge, and a high degree of excellence in reading, use of language, science, literature, and arts” [2]. Gifted students are distinguished by high academic achievement. They also “demonstrate special excellence and creativity in artistic fields such as drawing and they can be identified by specialists” [3]. The artistically gifted gifted non-specialist university student in this study is defined as a university student who studies in specializations other than fine arts and is nominated as gifted in fine arts after passing a test and an interview. AlDharman (2021) reported a relationship between artistic skills (hereafter ASs) and talent [4]. Skills refer to the ability to translate ideas into tangible meanings with flexibility, originality, fluency, and economy of time and effort. Artistically gifted individuals have skills that they can adapt to different situations.

Academics and decision-makers in educational institutions have emphasized the need to explore the academic engagement (hereafter AE) of university students as it is the key to addressing many academic, personal, social, and psychological problems [5,6]. AE is defined as “the extent to which the student adapts academically, educationally, psychologically, socially, and emotionally to the university life” [7]. AE is affected by a number of external factors, such as the academic climate, the definition of the student’s role and academic status, feedback from teachers, and the teaching methods used. It is also affected by the internal circumstances, e.g., interactions within the classroom, students’ perceptions of their educational environment, and their feeling of effective participation, self-efficacy, motivation, enthusiasm, and passion for learning [8]. Many studies, e.g., [9,10] reported that improving these factors increases satisfaction with the educational process and thus improves the degree of AE.

There is a need to study the ASs of artistically gifted non-specialist Saudi university students and explore if possessing ASs can have a positive reflection on these students’ AE. More specifically, this study addressed the following questions:

  • 1-

    What is the level of ASs among artistically gifted non-specialist students?

  • 2-

    What is the level of AE among artistically gifted non-specialist students?

  • 3-

    What is the nature of the relationship between ASs and AE among artistically gifted non-specialist students?

  • 4-

    What are the ways to raise the level of ASs among artistically gifted non-specialist students from the perspective of students and members of the Council of the Gifted Care Unit?

Research significance

This study can inform researchers, educators, social workers, and those responsible for artistically gifted students in Saudi universities of how to encourage students and invest their artistic energies for their benefit and the benefit of their community.

It sheds light on the level of Saudi university students’ ASs, which can illuminate the identification and nurturing of gifted students.

It is expected to identify the relationship between ASs and AE, which has not been researched to the best of the author’s knowledge.

It can provide a tool to measure the level of ASs and AE that can be used by researchers in Saudi Arabia.

Literature review

Artistic skills.

Hanna [11] defines ASs as “artistic practices that require the use of arm, hand, and finger movements. This practice is characterized by speed and accuracy, as well as by efficiency and experience.” Hala and Xhomara [12] define them as “specialized knowledge and experience that support the performance of specific tasks in the work environment. They include the techniques, tools, and procedures a person needs to do their job effectively”. According to Abdelhafeez [13], ASs refer to “the accuracy in using numbers and tools, or care in performance, and the ability to mix colors, find relationships, and formulate composition, all of which have two aspects, one of which is innovative and the second is memorized as a result of training.”

Mahmoud et al. [14] Suggest that students’ ASs fall within three basic dimensions: cognitive skills, performance skills, and emotional skills. Al-Awadi and Al-Kharusi [3] believe that the general basic ASs include three basic dimensions. The first dimension is plastic skills, which are concerned with the physical aspect of ASs. The second dimension is expressive skills, which are concerned with the emotional aspect of ASs, i.e., the student’s feelings and emotions. Technical skills constitute the third dimension, which is concerned with the performance aspect of ASs.

Because the development of ASs is an important outcome for university students, many studies addressed the development of ASs among university students. Ahmed [15] examined the development of ASs through ceramic ornaments among secondary school students as an introduction to creating a small project. The study followed the semi-experimental method. It concluded that it is possible to develop the artistic expression of secondary school students and enrich their innovative abilities through ceramic formation, which could qualify them to start small businesses.

Ibrahim [16] used the aesthetic formulations of batik using the two methods of performance immersion and engraving on wax to produce luminous print commentary to develop the ASs of a sample of 10 students at the Faculty of Specific Education, Ain Shams University. The results revealed that the problem of producing the design with clear lines using batik was solved by engraving on wax instead of using brush painting to achieve tactile and aesthetic values and find contemporary plastic solutions.

Salama [17] aimed to design an instructional workshop strategy as an introduction to developing the ASs of non-specialists, and to design an observation checklist to monitor the strengths and weaknesses of the workshop with the aim of raising the artistic taste and competence of non-specialists. The study sample consisted of 45 female students from five colleges at Suez University. The results indicated that the instructional workshop contributed to raising the level of students’ ASs, although they came from different specializations.

Al-Ghamdi [18] targeted developing the artistic imagination skills of intermediate school students through stories. The study followed the semi-experimental method. Data was collected from 30 students using the Artistic Imagination Skills Inventory. The results revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the participants’ pre- and post-test mean scores on the inventory’s individual dimensions and the total score of the artistic imagination skills in favor of the post-test, thus supporting the effectiveness of using stories in art education.

Hanna [11] explored the effectiveness of infographics in developing some ASs among second-graders of the preparatory school. To achieve this goal, a teacher’s guide, student worksheets, and an observation checklist were developed to clarify and assess the effectiveness of using infographics in teaching art to the study population. The results supported the effectiveness of infographics in developing some of the participants” ASs.

Saleh and Al-Bashir [19] investigated the characteristics of the deaf and assessed the level of their cognitive and creative abilities in artistic applications. The study followed the descriptive analytical method, where a questionnaire was administered to a sample of deaf students at the bachelor and diploma levels. The study concluded that the participants displayed superior cognitive and sensory abilities, creative skills, and artistic imagination for good expression.

Khalil [20] revealed the plastic treatments of plastic consumables to develop the artistic skill of 20 art students at the Faculty of Art Education in Zamalek. The results revealed that the construction and enrichment of the artwork and the development of the artistic skill of the participants were achieved through multiple plastic treatments and methods of constructing and enriching the artwork. The participants’ artistic skill in assembling and constructing the artwork developed. The study recommended that art teaching programs should be developed to promote the students’ ASs.

Academic engagement.

Schaufeli et al. [21] define AE as a “state of mind that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption. Rather than a momentary and specific state, engagement refers to a more persistent and pervasive emotional cognitive state that is not focused on any particular object, event, individual, or behavior”. Conner [22] suggests that engagement is similar to terms such as activity, participation, interest, motivation, and effort. Engagement is commitment to an activity, and it mediates the relationship between students and activities. Martin and Torres [23] suggest that AE is linked to learners’ interactions with various educational components such as the community, university staff, classmates, teachers, and courses. Martin, et al. [24] define AE as “a psychological state characterized by a student’s sense of belonging, attributing value to education, and participating in school, learning, studying, and curricular activities. AE is particularly characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption”. Through a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Schaufeli et al. [21] extracted a model of AE comprising vigor, dedication, and absorption. Initially, engagement was conceived of as work-related, but it has recently been expanded to include AE. According to Schaufeli et al. [21], the student, like the employee, participates in arranged and organized tasks such as completing tasks and projects to achieve a specific goal such as passing exams. Thus, the term engagement can be extended to include the school.

The model of engagement extracted by Schaufeli et al. [21] comprises three dimensions: vigor, dedication, and absorption. Vigor refers to high levels of energy and mental resilience while working, the willingness to invest effort in one’s work, and persistence even in the face of difficulties. Dedication is characterized by a sense of significance, enthusiasm, inspiration, pride, and challenge. Absorption is characterized by being fully concentrated and deeply engrossed in one’s work. These three dimensions are separate and yet interconnected and complementary in the school context [25].

In the study by Sengsouliya, et al. [26], students had a high level of engagement in terms of the emotional, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions. They were more engaged in learning when teachers provided them with opportunities for discussions with their peers. Shih [27] reported that teacher support during the school day had a positive impact on students’ AE in all three behavioral, cognitive, and emotional aspects, and thus had a significant impact on academic achievement. Buzzai, et al. [28] found that feelings of satisfaction and academic achievement are positively related to AE. A survey of literature reveals a number of factors that are closely related to AE, e.g., motivation, colleagues, teachers, and family [26]. AE with its three dimensions is also linked to the academic environment.

Among the important previous studies that addressed AE is Al-Mishmishi’s study [29] that aimed to identify the contribution of problem-solving skills to predicting AE among students of the College of Education. The study followed the descriptive approach, where data collection tools were applied to 263 science and art students. The study found a positive correlation between AE and problem-solving skills. Students’ AE could be predicted by problem-solving skills. The study of Zaki and Salem (2023) investigated the relative contribution of regulatory focus, academic hardness, and implicit intelligence to online learning engagement among Benha University students. The study followed the descriptive approach, where data was collected via questionnaires from 92 students. The study found a positive correlation between commitment and behavioral engagement in online learning [5].

Ali [9] aimed to reveal the possibility of understanding and interpreting the best structural model for explaining the direct and indirect effects of the dimensions of positive academic emotions on AE through academic grit as a mediating variable among a sample of 587 first year secondary school students. The results revealed a good fit of the proposed structural model of the relationships among all dimensions of positive academic emotions and AE.

Al-Hadhali and Al-Harbi [30] examined the relationship between mental wandering and AE. The study sample consisted of 420 bachelor degree students at Umm Al-Qura University. The AE scale developed by Mahasneh et al. [31] was applied to the participants. The results showed that Umm Al-Qura University students had a high level of AE. The study recommended training students on identifying their academic problems and solving them, which can contribute to increasing AE.

Al-Qasabi [32] explored the effect of short-term targeted attention training in reducing mental wandering during e-learning among university students. The final study sample consisted of 52 university students who were randomly and equally assigned to experimental and control groups. The results supported the effectiveness of attention training in reducing mental wandering in the experimental group.

Al-Harbi [33] sought to reveal the differences between the hypothesized mean of AE and its sub-dimensions and the actual mean among Qassim University students. A cohort of 400 female students were administered the AE questionnaire developed by Al-Janadi and Talab [34] The study found statistically significant differences between the respondents’ mean scores on the AE questionnaire in favor of the actual mean.

Abbas [35] studied AE among university students and differences in it by gender and specialization. The study sample consisted of 376 students who responded to the AE questionnaire developed Abu Qura [36]. The participants were found to have high AE. No statistically significant differences in AE by gender or specialization were found.

Finally, Al-Najjar [37] sought to identify the relationship between mental alertness and both the need for knowledge and AE among graduate students at the College of Education (N = 296). Another aim was to identify the possibility of predicting AE by mental alertness and the need for knowledge. The study found a positive correlation between some dimensions of mental alertness and the need for knowledge, and some dimensions of AE.

The research context

Population of the study are artistically gifted students from programs in Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University other than fine arts (medicine, engineering, science, business administration, etc). They are admitted to the Gifted Care Unit based on a practical test and personal interviews. The unit provides them with qualifying courses in a number of arts and the tools they need while completing their artworks. At the beginning of the academic year, the Deanship of Student Affairs launches a university-wide talent competition, including fine arts. A committee of five faculty members in the arts department evaluates artistically gifted applicants by a practical test and personal interviews. Students meeting the selection criteria are then registered in the Gifted Care Unit according to the arts they are gifted in, e.g., drawing, sculpture, graphic design, and photography. At their convenience, the students keep attending at the unit to produce their artworks, and from time to time they are provided with specialized training. They also receive guidance from the specialists at the unit.

Method

Study design.

This exploratory study followed a mixed-methods design involving quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis. The participating students responded to a 30-item author-developed questionnaire assessing their ASs and AE using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”. Data obtained from responses to these 30 items was treated quantitatively and used to answer the first three research questions. The questionnaire also had an open-ended question about ways to promote students’ ASs. The participants’ answers to this question were analyzed qualitatively to extract common themes. Furthermore, structured interviews were conducted with members of the university’s Gifted Care Unit Council on the basis of voluntary participation. Those members were asked the same open-ended question in the students’ questionnaire about ways to promote students’ ASs. Data obtained from the interviews were qualitatively analyzed for common themes. Members’ feedback together with students’ responses answered the fourth research question about ways to promote students’ ASs.

Participants

After receiving ethical approval from the Standing Committee for Bioethics Research (SCBR) at Prince Sattam University No. 307/2024, on 04/07/2024, data collection, including questionnaire distribution and interviews, began on 10/07/2024, and was completed on 22/08/2024. A cohort of 102 male and female artistically gifted non-specialist students enrolled in the Plastic Arts Section of the Gifted Care Unit at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia responded to the study questionnaire probing ASs and AE. Their ages ranged from 18 to 23 years. They all came from undergraduate programs in theoretical and applied colleges: 37% from applied colleges, 33% from theoretical colleges, 15% from health colleges, 13% from the diploma program, and 4% from the preparatory year. Student participation was optional. An electronic link of the questionnaire was sent to the students who were informed that they had the choice to complete the questionnaire or decline it. Thus, their completion of the questionnaire implied their consent to participate. Furthermore, 14 members of the university’s Gifted Care Unit participated in structured interviews to probe their opinions on how to promote students’ ASs. Those members varied in terms of gender, qualification, and experience.

Instruments

The questionnaire.

A 30-item questionnaire was developed by the author to probe students’ ASs and AE. The construction of the questionnaire began with a literature review of tools assessing ASs [4,14] and AE [6,22,38,39]. The preliminary version of the questionnaire that had 35 items was face-validated by a number of specialists who were invited to judge the wording of the items and the inclusion of items under their respective dimensions. Based on their feedback, some items were reworded and some other items (N = 5) were excluded, leaving the questionnaire with 30 items. The final version of the questionnaire had two subscales: ASs (17) items and AE (13 items). The ASs subscale had 3 dimensions: cognitive skills (6 items), performance skills (6 items), and emotional skills (5 items). The AE subscale also had three dimensions: academic vigor (5 items), academic dedication (4 items), and academic absorption (4 items). The students responded to the questionnaire items based on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”. Additionally, the questionnaire had an open-ended question about ways to promote students’ ASs. The students were asked to provide their suggestions in response to this question.

After obtaining the ethical approval, the questionnaire was electronically administered to the students. The obtained data was then statistically treated to establish the questionnaire’s validity and reliability. To check the construct validity of the questionnaire, correlations among items and their respective dimensions and among items and the total score were calculated. Items correlated with their respective dimensions with coefficients ranging between 0.53 and 0.85 and with the total score with coefficients ranging between 0.30 and 0.79. All correlation coefficients were statistically significant at the 0.01 level, indicating that the questionnaire was internally consistent. These results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Correlations among items, dimensions, and the total score.
Item Cor. with dimension Cor. with the total score Item Cor. with dimension Cor. with the total score Item Cor. with dimension Cor. with the total score
Artistic Skills
1 0.83** 0.55** 7 0.54** 0.49** 13 0.81** 0.55**
2 0.80** 0.62** 8 0.62** 0.51** 14 0.71** 0.44**
3 0.85** 0.70** 9 0.63** 0.55** 15 0.78** 0.55**
4 0.81** 0.64** 10 0.68** 0.60** 16 0.79** 0.50**
5 0.69** 0.66** 11 0.53** 0.30** 17 0.79** 0.30**
6 0.80** 0.57** 12 0.69** 0.49**
Academic Engagement
1 0.75** 0.49** 6 0.70** 0.51** 10 0.67** 0.48**
2 0.73** 0.39** 7 0.79** 0.43** 11 0.76** 0.51**
3 0.80** 0.50** 8 0.83** 0.50** 12 0.73** 0.49**
4 0.74** 0.43** 9 0.69** 0.37** 13 0.77** 0.51**
5 0.54** 0.45**

** Significant at the 0.01 level.

The questionnaire’s reliability was checked by the Alpha Cronbach method. The alpha estimates of the dimensions and the total questionnaire ranged between 0.67 and 0.90, indicating that the questionnaire was quite reliable. These results are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Alpha coefficients for the questionnaire’s reliability.
No. Variable Alpha Coefficient
1 Cognitive skills 0.88
2 Performance skills 0.67
3 Emotional skills 0.83
4 Academic vigor 0.76
5 Academic dedication 0.74
6 Academic absorption 0.71
7 The total questionnaire 0.90

The interview.

The author conducted structured interviews with 14 members of the Gifted Care Unit. They were asked the same question included in the students’ questionnaire about ways to promote students’ ASs. In the interviews, the author would ask probing questions to obtain further explanations from the interviewees. The interviews were conducted electronically and recorded with the interviewees’ consent. The recorded interviews were later analyzed for common themes.

Data analysis

The quantitative data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the level of students’ ASs and AE. Pearson correlation coefficients were also used to identify the correlations among the study variables. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the prediction of students’ ASs by their AE. Responses given by students and members of the Gifted Care Unit to the open-ended question were analyzed qualitatively for common themes.

Results

The level of students’ ASs and AE

Prior to statistical analysis, the normal distribution of scores was examined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. All the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test values were greater than 0.05, indicating that all sets of scores were normally distributed. To consider a mean as high, medium, or low, Oxford’s [40] scoring system was used: high (mean of 3.5 or higher), medium (mean of 2.5–3.4), and low (mean of 2.4 or lower).

Artistic skills

To identify the students’ level of ASs, means and standard deviations were calculated. These results are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. The descriptive statistics of students’ ASs in descending order.

No. Items M SD Degree of Agreement
Cognitive Skills
1 I link the content of artistic works to life and contemporary events in society. 4.06 .931 High
2 I have the ability to compare works of art. 4.01 .895 High
3 I am familiar with artistic concepts. 3.91 .924 High
4 I have knowledge of the development of art throughout history. 3.74 1.05 High
5 I have the ability to analyze artworks. 3.73 1.06 High
6 I follow developments in the field of plastic arts. 3.56 1.18 High
Total 3.84 .805 High
Performance Skills
1 I have the skill of drawing with a pencil. 4.02 1.12 High
2 I use modern artistic techniques when implementing my artistic works. 3.87 1.05 High
3 I have skill in painting using colors. 3.84 1.05 High
4 I abstain from imitating others while producing artistic works. 3.81 .876 High
5 I make use of appropriate environmental materials to produce my artworks. 3.79 1.06 High
6 I improve my experience by attending workshops and training courses in the arts. 3.16 1.23 Medium
Total 3.75 .659 High
Emotional Skills
1 I appreciate works of art from different cultures. 4.63 .716 High
2 I appreciate artworks in exhibitions. 4.45 .816 High
3 I can taste the beauty of works of art. 4.37 .911 High
4 I realize the aesthetic dimensions of the colors used in the artwork. 4.31 .867 High
5 I express my feelings through my art practice. 4.22 .953 High
Total 4.40 .664 High

Data in Table 3 reveals that the means of the three dimensions of ASs are high. Emotional skills ranked first with a mean of 4.40, followed by cognitive skills (M = 3.84) and performance skills (M = 3.75. But for one item, all items achieved high means. The only item that achieved a medium agreement is “I improve my experience by attending workshops and training courses in fine arts”. This may hint to some kind of weakness in the training provided to artistically gifted students either because students are not encouraged to attend training events or because not much training is offered to them. Overall, these results reveal that the students’ ASs are high.

Academic engagement

Table 4 below presents the descriptive statistics of the students’ AE.

Table 4. The descriptive statistics of the students’ AE in descending order.

No. Items M SD Degree of Agreement
Academic Vigor
1 I persevere in my studies even when things are not going well. 4.19 .829 High
2 I have great flexibility in my studies. 3.82 .905 High
3 I have the desire to study when I wake up in the morning. 3.76 1.03 High
4 I feel active and energetic while studying. 3.73 .911 High
5 I have the ability to study for long hours. 3.65 1.03 High
Total 3.83 .676 High
Academic Dedication
1 I am proud of my field of study. 4.55 .852 High
2 I try to overcome obstacles during my studies. 4.34 .724 High
3 I feel enthusiastic about my studies. 4.11 .831 High
4 I achieve my goals by studying. 3.94 1.04 High
Total 4.23 .654 High
Academic Absorption
1 I feel comfortable while studying my lessons. 3.95 .958 High
2 Time passes quickly when I’m studying. 3.70 1.08 High
3 I feel happy when I’m studying intensively. 3.43 1.25 Medium
4 I forget everything around me when I’m studying. 3.35 1.03 Medium
Total 3.61 .791 High

As listed in Table 4, the means of the three dimensions of AE are high. Academic dedication achieved the highest mean (M = 4.23), followed by academic vigor (M = 3.83) and academic absorption (M = 3.61). But for two items, the means of all other items are high. Overall, these results indicate a high level of AE among students.

The relationship between ASs and AE

To identify the relationship between academic skills and AE, Pearson correlations were calculated. These results are listed in Table 5 below.

Table 5. Correlations among student’s ASs and AE.

1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Cognitive skills
2. Performance skills 0.70**
3. Emotional skills 0.60** 0.57**
4. Academic vigor 0.22* 0.30** 0.12
5. Academic dedication 0.19 0.30** 0.23* 0.56**
6. Academic absorption 0.29** 0.33** 0.22* 0.63** 0.54**

As listed in Table 5, the strongest correlations are among dimensions of each of the two constructs, i.e., ASs and AE. This supports the construct validity of the questionnaire. As to the relationship between ASs and AE, cognitive ASs correlated positively and significantly with academic vigor (r = 0.22) and academic absorption (r = 0.29). However, their correlation with academic dedication is positive but insignificant (r = 0.19). Performance ASs correlated positively and significantly with all dimensions of AE: academic vigor (r = 0.30), academic dedication (r = 0.30), and academic absorption (r = 0.33). Emotional ASs correlated positively and significantly with academic dedication (r = 0.23) and academic absorption (r = 0.22). Their correlation with academic vigor was positive but insignificant (r = 0.12).

The relationship between the total ASs and AE is positive and significant (r = 33) as shown in Table 6 below. Overall, these results indicate that students with higher levels of ASs are more academically engaged than their counterparts with lower ASs.

Table 6. The relationship between the total and AE.

Artistic skills Academic engagement
Artistic skills Pearson Correlation 1 0.33**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.001
N 102 102
Academic engagement Pearson Correlation 0.33** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.001
N 102 102

To further evaluate the contribution of ASs to AE, stepwise regression analysis was conducted with the three individual dimensions of ASs and total ASs as predictor variables and total AE as a dependent variable. Multicollinearity was first checked to identify if the stepwise method could be used. No multicollinearity issue was detected, as correlations among the independent variables were not high. Furthermore, the VIF values for all the variables ranged from 1.1 to 2.2, which are all acceptable. The analysis produced one model where only performance ASs positively and significantly predicted AE. The regression model is shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Stepwise multiple regression for predicting AE by AS.

Predictors R R2 F B SE β t p
Performance skills 0.36 0.132 15.2*** 0.33 0.085 0.36 3.9 .000

It is clear from Table 7 that performance ASs significantly and positively predicted students’ AE (β = 0.36, t = 3.9, p ≤ 0.001). This indicates that students’ performance ASs explained 13% of variance in their AE. That is, of the three dimensions of AS, performance skills proved to be the only predictor of AE.

When standard regression was conducted with total ASs as a predictor variable and total AE as a dependent variable, the extracted model (Table 8) was significant. AS significantly and positively predicted AE (β = 0.36, t = 3.9, p ≤ 0.001). ASs explained 11% of variance in AE. That is, students with higher level of ASs are more academically engaged.

Table 8. Standard regression for predicting AE by AS.

Predictors R R2 F B SE β t p
Ass 0.33 0.111 12.4** 0.32 0.091 0.33 3.5 .001

Ways to promote students’ ASs

To answer the research question about ways to promote students’ ASs, the participating students’ responses to the open-ended question and the feedback given by members of the Gifted Care Unit in the interview were qualitatively analyzed.

Students’ feedback

The researcher read the students’ responses to the open-ended question about ways to promote their ASs. The students offered 12 themes, the strongest of which was offered by 56% of the students, while the weakest was offered by 6% of the students. The following table summarizes the themes with sizable agreement from the students.

As listed in Table 9, the suggestions provided by the largest number of students centered on the provision of specialized training, supportive environment, and financial and spiritual support. The other highly agreed upon suggestions centered on attending art galleries and interaction with professional artists for experience sharing. A sizeable number of students also suggested continuous practice of the ASs. It is clear that most of the suggestions offered are the responsibility of the university, and few of them need personal initiative.

Table 9. Summary of the themes emerged from students’ responses.

No. Themes %
1 Attending training workshops and courses 56
2 Continuous practice of the AS 53
3 Visiting art galleries 51
4 Provision of a supportive environment for performing various artistic works by the university 47
5 Provision of financial and spiritual support to artistically gifted students by the university and the family 46
6 Communication and interaction with professional artists 38
7 Provision of spaces to practice AS 29
8 Art competitions 26
9 Participation in group artistic activities 18

Members’ feedback

A thematic analysis [41] was conducted to investigate the open-ended responses gathered from the survey instrument. The researcher developed a coding scheme to systematically classify the data and identify emergent trends. The analytical framework was subsequently applied to the interview transcripts, following the same methodological procedures. Thematic patterns were identified through iterative reading, coding, and data refinement. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the consistency and discrepancies between the themes extracted from the survey responses and those from the interview data, subsequent to the formulation of a cohesive set of themes from both sources. Where subject convergence was identified, integration was implemented to enhance the interpretive depth of the findings. All definitive topics were examined and validated by the researcher to ensure analytical rigor.

The role of the gifted care unit.

All the members pointed out the important role the unit plays to nurture artistically gifted students and to spread the art culture throughout the university. They confirmed that the unit launches enrichment programs in fine arts, many of which target educating members of the unit and interested faculty members in the university about the best ways to nurture students’ ASs. They mentioned examples of the training courses provided by the unit, e.g., a training course titled “Gifted people: Investing in generations of scholars and geniuses”. When asked the question, member 3 stated, “The unit focuses on teaching technical skills and expanding students’ creative horizons by connecting them with diverse cultural and artistic topics. This contributes to shaping a comprehensive artistic vision among students, thus enhancing the university’s role in spreading artistic culture widely.” When the same question was asked to member 14, he said, “Through the activities organized by the unit, students are able to develop their technical skills and enhance their creative sense. The activities provided by the unit are not limited to learning technical skills, but also include employing these skills in the labor market, which helps students produce distinctive, relevant artwork.”

The need for more training and identification efforts.

Eleven of the 14 members suggested that artistically gifted students need more specialized training opportunities. They mentioned areas where students need training, e.g., acrylic coloring techniques, the basics of the graphic design, and forming jewelry with metal minting. Nine of the members (64%) pointed out the need to launch identification expeditions to identify artistically gifted students from all the colleges to reach neglected artistically gifted students. Member 1 expressed a clear opinion on the need to increase training efforts directed at artistically gifted students. He stated that it is necessary to introduce new technologies into training, such as training in the arts of photography and video art, as well as the need to emphasize training on modern tools used in digital arts. He added: “Technological development has added new dimensions to art, and this must be reflected in the training programs we provide to our students, which aim to gradually develop their skills, especially in the arts of digital photography.”

The need to link students to outside sources of experience.

Eight members confirmed that artistically gifted students need to be linked to outside sources of artistic experience. For this reason, they mentioned that students need to pay more frequent visits to art galleries inside and outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the company of supervisors from the unit. They also recommended that professional national and international artists be invited to the unit to share their experience with students. As they commented, the unit actually invites professional artists, but not with a satisfactory frequency. In this respect, the head of the unit stated, “We need and plan to send our students to more art galleries because galleries stimulate students’ creativity and artistic production”. Member 9 said, “We need to increase the connection between students and the global art community. The Gifted and Talented Unit could organize periodic visits to international exhibitions or meetings with well-known artists to broaden students’ horizons and develop their artistic culture.”

Member 5 also stated, “Students should be more exposed to direct contact with art”. Therefore, he suggested that there be traveling exhibitions on campus that display students’ works periodically, with prizes allocated to encourage the winners.” He continued, “Traveling exhibitions give students the opportunity to see their own work alongside that of their peers, which helps them develop their artistic taste and increase their creativity.” Regarding meetings with artists, member 10 emphasized the need to organize periodic visits to some artists in various artistic fields saying: “Exposure to diverse artistic cultures and organized dialogues through students’ meetings with professional artists will contribute to enriching the students’ artistic experience and expanding their horizons, and this will give them a new vision that will help them innovate and create in their artistic works.”

The need for family support.

Eight members confirmed that families can play a significant role in the nurturing of their children’s artistic gifts. Member 8 stated, “Significant others, especially family members, should provide artistically gifted students with financial and more importantly spiritual support. This is why the unit should be in touch with families and educate them about how to encourage their children to take their talents to higher levels”. Member 11 also pointed out that “family support is a pivotal factor in developing students’ artistic skills, as it encourages them to continue their artistic career.” He added that it is important to organize workshops for families to educate them on how to encourage their children to develop their artistic skills.

The need to stimulate students’ creativity.

Seven members raised the need for creating the spirit of completion among artistically gifted students to stimulate them to be more creative in their art productions. They therefore suggested holding more art competitions, propagandizing them inside and outside the university, and allocating tempting prizes for winners. Member 11 stated, “Art competitions are very stimulating to students’ creativity. We need to organize more art competitions and invite professional artists to referee students’ productions”. Member 6 proposed that “adding a motivational aspect through artistic challenges could encourage students to work on innovative projects, as it would be useful to organize artistic competitions, where students compete to implement innovative artistic projects, with prizes awarded to encourage the spirit of competition and creativity.”

Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data.

Triangulation [39] was conducted to improve the validity of the findings by comparing and integrating results from the quantitative and qualitative components of the study. The researcher employed analytical worksheets to organize and cross-reference the datasets, enabling the identification of convergent and divergent trends. The integrated analysis was reported in accordance with the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study checklist to ensure transparency and methodological rigor. Table 10 presents a summary of the triangulated findings.

Table 10. Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data.
Themes for Quantitative data Themes for Qualitative data Sub-Themes
____ The Role of the Gifted Care Unit Nurturing artistically gifted students and spreading the art culture throughout the university.
Launching enrichment programs in fine arts
Attending training workshops and courses The Need for More Training and Identification Efforts Acrylic coloring techniquesThe basics of the graphic design
Provision of spaces to practice AS Forming jewelry with metal minting.
Continuous practice of the AS
Visiting art galleries The Need to Link Students to Outside Sources of Experience The need to pay more frequent visits to art galleries inside and outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Communication and interaction with professional artists Professional national and international artists be invited to the unit to share their experience with students.
Provision of financial and spiritual support to artistically gifted students by the university and the family The Need for Family Support Providing artistically gifted students with financial
Spiritual support.
Holding more art competitions
Propagandizing them inside and outside the university,
Provision of a supportive environment for performing various artistic works by the university The Need to Stimulate Students’ Creativity Allocating tempting prizes for winners
Participation in group artistic activities
Art competitions

Discussion

The results revealed that students’ cognitive ASs are high. This can be attributed to the Gifted Care Unit’s efforts in providing students with artistic experiences and knowledge. Furthermore, artistically gifted students may have an inherent interest in being updated on the developments in their preferred arts. One more possible explanation is the ease of accessing art knowledge thanks to the ever-expanding information technology. Information technology and devices are readily available in Saudi Arabia, and because of being well-off, Saudi students possess the latest technological devices, which they can use efficiently. This finding is in line with the studies of [16,17], where students’ were found to have sophisticated artistic knowledge owing to the availability of technological information sources. The students’ possessed high performance ASs. This may refer to the effective nomination and admission of gifted students to the Gifted Care Unit. One other possible reason is the specialized training and support provided to students by the unit. The interview with members of the unit revealed that the unit provides students with workshops to promote their performance. This finding converges with Salama’s study [17], which found that providing students with specialized training strengthens their ASs. This finding is also in line with the studies of Saleh and Al-Bashir [19,20], which concluded that students could promote their performance thanks to the availability of tools and modern art technologies. As to emotional ASs, the students were found to have highly positive artistic attitudes. This seems logical because art is their passion. This finding is consistent with several previous studies, e.g., the studies of Ahmed [11,15,18], where artistically gifted students were reported to be highly appreciative of artistic expression.

As to AE, the students in this study were found to be highly academically engaged in terms of academic vigor, dedication, and absorption. ASs give students the feelings of satisfaction and pride. One may allege that ASs flourish the spirit of serenity in students. They make their imagination vivid. All these attributes may contribute to artistically gifted students’ being focused on their academic study. This same finding was reported by previous studies [7,38,35], where comparable samples of students were found to be more academically engaged than students without ASs. Taha [38] concluded that students possessing the feelings of satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and pride are more academically engaged than students lacking these feelings. Practicing arts can provide students with these feelings.

More importantly, this study reported a positive and significant correlation between ASs and AE. ASs as a whole were found to explain 11% of variance in students’ AE. This suggests that pursuing arts fosters students’ AE. Of all the dimensions of ASs, only performance skills predicted students’ AE. They explained 13% of the variance in students’ AE. This finding seems reasonable since performance is the executive aspect of art and is therefore more influential on students’ mentality. Al-Zahrani [10] reported that students’ participation in extracurricular activities fosters students’ AE. Of course ASs come at the top of extracurricular activities in the University of this Study’ population. Knoop [42] suggested that activities that give students satisfaction, happiness, optimism, hope, and pride foster their motivation, attention, and self-regulated learning. In this same respect, Suleiman [43] found that pursuing art enhances students’ mental abilities.

The author thinks that practicing ASs helps students get rid of negative emotions as confirmed by the studies of Al-Arabi [44]. Rivera [45] suggests that art is important for students who are unable to express themselves in words or communicate verbally. Art enables them to express their emotions, thoughts, fears, and fancies. Diehls [46] also believes that art gives students the opportunity to express their feelings and thoughts through visual images such as drawings, photographs, and sculptures. This makes them feel relaxed and reduces their anxiety, which makes them more prepared to express themselves and release their inner feelings.

Analysis of students’ responses to the open-ended question about ways to promote their ASs and the feedback provided by members of the Gifted Care Unit in the interviews revealed several suggestions that both samples agreed upon. These included, among others, the need to (1) provide students with more specialized training, (2) link them to outside sources of artistic experience, e.g., art galleries, (3) provide them with support, especially spiritual support from significant others, and encourage them to be more creative in their artistic production through competitions.

Conclusions

The important finding in this study is that ASs, especially performance skills, contributes to students AE. This makes it important for specialized entities like the Gifted Care Unit to exert more efforts to identify artistically gifted students in all university programs. These efforts can identify students who are aware that they have artistic skills and students who have artistic skills but are unaware of them. The art culture should be spread all over the university to attract more students to join the Gifted Care Unit. The artistically gifted students should be provided with specialized training, contact with outside sources of artistic experience, an art-nurturing environment, incentives to be more creative, and support, especially spiritual support.

Research limitations

The generalizability of this study’s findings is limited by the somehow small size of the sample. Future investigations can yield more generalizable results by using a larger sample. It is also recommended that future investigations include interviews with students to elicit from them more illuminating information.

Supporting information

S1 Data. The questionnaire.

(DOCX)

pone.0329483.s001.docx (14.6KB, docx)
S2 Data. Raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0329483.s002.xlsx (26.3KB, xlsx)
S3 Data. Quantified data.

(XLSX)

pone.0329483.s003.xlsx (26.4KB, xlsx)
S4 Data. Data analysis.

(XLSX)

pone.0329483.s004.xlsx (24KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number (PSAU/2025/R/1446).

References

  • 1.Shuhaib R, Al-Kinani M, Jabr R. Predicting academic achievement through some motivations and needs among various categories of gifted students. Mansoura College of Education Journal. doi: 10.21608/maed.2019.133185 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ayasrah S, Ismail N. Traits and characteristics of gifted and high achieving students as a basis for developing measures to identify them. Arab Journal for the Development of Excellence. 2012;3(4):97–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Al-Awadi M, Al-Kharusi H. Artistic skills among gifted students in the plastic arts. Journal of the Faculty of Education in Fayoum. 2012;12:387–440. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Al-Dharman G. The effectiveness of virtual classes in enriching artistic skills in light of the systemic theory of the Corona 19 pandemic from the point of view of art education teachers. Journal of Specific Education and Technology. Kafr El-Sheikh University. 2021; 21(8):16–37. doi: 10.21608/MAAT.2021.219600 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zaki H, Salem R. The relative contribution of organizational focus, academic rigidity, and implicit intelligence to integration into e-learning among university students. Egyptian Journal of Psychological Studies, Faculty of Education, Benha University. 2023;32(117):405-484. doi: 10.21608/EJCJ.2022.271066 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tahoun H, Sharabi N, Al-Bashir F. Psychometric properties of the academic engagement scale. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Al-Arish University. 2023;11(33):451–79. doi: 10.21608/FOEJ.2022.167024.1156 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khudair A, Radi N. University engagement among university students: construction and application. Basra Research Journal for the Human Sciences. 2017;42(2):363–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Al-Sawat A. The level of satisfaction with academic guidance services and its relationship to academic engagement and psychological and cognitive integration of university students in light of some variables. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Al-Azhar University. 2015;34(2):367–406. doi: 10.21608/JSREP.2015.55531 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ali A. Modeling the causal relationships between positive emotions, determination, and engagement into the academic field among first-year secondary school students. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Alexandria University. 2023;33(1):121–66. doi: 10.21608/JEALEX.2023.279791 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Al-Zahrani S. Academic engagement and its relationship to psychological values among a sample of university students in light of some demographic variables. College of Arts and Human Sciences, King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah. 2018;27(1):253–68. 10.4197/Art.27-1.9 [DOI]
  • 11.Hanna I. The effectiveness of infographics in teaching art education to develop some artistic skills and visual thinking among middle school students. Fayoum University Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences. Fayoum University Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences. 2021;15(8):640–79. doi: 10.21608/jfust.2021.80969.1390 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hala M, Xhomara N. Didactic-Artistic Tools and Artistic Works Demonstration Contribution to Students’ Artistic Skills Development. PED. 2023;148(4):229–47. doi: 10.15823/p.2022.148.12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abdelhafeez N. Extracting the factors contributing to refining the artistic skills of some of the world’s leading visual artists and trying to benefit from them in developing a vision for caring for artistically gifted students. Al-Zarqa Journal of Human Research and Studies, Jordan. 2021;21(1):196–211. doi: 10.12816/0057791 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mahmoud R, Abdeljalil A, Abdelhamid A. The effectiveness of electronic educational blogs in developing some artistic skills among middle school students. Scientific Journal, Faculty of Education, Assiut University. 2021;37(1):151–74. doi: 10.21608/MFES.2021.147144 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ahmed A. Developing artistic skills through ceramic ornaments among secondary education students as an introduction to creating a small project. Journal of Specific Education Studies and Research. Zagazig University. 2023;9(2):476–500. doi: 10.21608/jsezu.2023.294390 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ibrahim N. Aesthetic formulations of batik as an entry point for creating a multi-level illuminated printing press to develop the artistic skills of art education students. Emsia Scientific Journal of Education through Art. 2022;8(32):1005–26. doi: 10.21608/amesea.2022.271614 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salama R. Educational workshop strategy as an introduction to developing artistic skills for non-specialists. Cairo. AMESIA Scientific Journal of Education through Art. 2021;7(27):2165–84. doi: 10.21608/amesea.2021.195991 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Al-Ghamdi A. The effect of using stories in teaching art education to develop some artistic imagination skills among middle school students. Journal of Specific Education Research in Mansoura. 2021;2021(63):23–50. doi: 10.21608/mbse.2021.73369.1025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Al-Bashir R, Saleh A. Cognitive and creative artistic skills among students with hearing needs: The art of hand weaving is a model. Journal of Human Sciences. 2018;2(19):1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khalil R, Ali A. Plastic treatments for plastic consumables to enrich the artistic work as an introduction to developing the artistic skills of the students of the art workshop. Scientific Journal of the Association of Education through Art. 2018;4(14):194–213. doi: 10.21608/amesea.2018.76205 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-romá V, Bakker AB. The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2002;3(1):71–92. doi: 10.1023/a:1015630930326 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Conner T. Academic engagement ratings and instructional preferences: comparing behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement among three school-age student cohort. Review of Higher Education & Self-Learning. 2011;4(13):52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martin J, Torres A. What is student engagement and why is it important? 2016. Available from: https://www.youscience.com/student-engagement/
  • 24.Barragán Martín AB, Pérez-Fuentes MDC, Molero Jurado MDM, Martos Martínez Á, Simón Márquez MDM, Sisto M, et al. Emotional Intelligence and Academic Engagement in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:307–16. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S302697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ouweneel E, Le Blanc PM, Schaufeli WB. On being grateful and kind: results of two randomized controlled trials on study-related emotions and academic engagement. J Psychol. 2014;148(1):37–60. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.742854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sengsouliya S, Soukhavong S, Sengsouliya S, Silavong N, Littlepage F. An investigation on predictors of student academic engagement. European Journal of Education Studies. 2020;6(10):124–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shih S-S. Factors related to Taiwanese adolescents’ academic engagement and achievement goal orientations. The Journal of Educational Research. 2020;114(1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2020.1861584 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Buzzai C, Sorrenti L, Costa S, Toffle ME, Filippello P. The relationship between school-basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration, academic engagement and academic achievement. School Psychology International. 2021;42(5):497–519. doi: 10.1177/01430343211017170 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Al-Mishmishi A, Saber A, Jamal A, Ismail I. Predicting the academic engagement of college of education students through problem-solving skills. Damietta College of Education Journal. 2023;38(84.03):2–47. doi: 10.21608/jsdu.2023.278270 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Al- Hadhali T, Al-Harbi N. Mental wandering and its relationship to academic engagement among Umm Al-Qura University students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences. National Research Center in Gaza. 2023;7(7):113–34. doi: 10.26389/ajsrp.d021022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mahasneh A, Al-Alwan A, Al-Azamat O. Academic immersion and its relationship to goal orientations among university students. Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences. 2019;15(2):149–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Al-Qasabi W. The effect of attention training technology on the wanderlust and academic engagement of university students in the e-learning environment. Egyptian Journal of Psychological Studies in Cairo. 2022;32(116):345–408. doi: 10.21608/ejcj.2022.247896 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Al-Harbi A. The relationship of academic engagement to future goals and self-regulation of learning among students: a field study on a sample of female students at Qassim University. Shun Social Magazine. Sharjah Sociological Society. 2022;39(156):149–90. doi: 10.35217/0048-039-156-005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Al-Janadi L, Talab S. The perspective of future time in light of academic engagement and academic achievement among a sample of female university students. Journal of Educational Sciences. 2016;24(3):312–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abbas M. Academic engagement among university students. Journal of Human Sciences. 2021;28(4):1–9. doi: 10.33855/0905-028-004-02 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abu Qura K. Profiles of academic achievement emotions and their relationship to academic advancement among secondary school students. Journal of the Faculty of Education in Beni Suef. 2018;15(4):147–216. doi: 10.21608/jfe.2018.74283 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Al-Najjar H. Mental alertness and its relationship to the need for knowledge and academic engagement among postgraduate students at the College of Education. Journal of the College of Education in Benha. 2019;30(3):92–158. doi: 10.21608/jfeb.2019.100869 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Taha R. Academic engagement and its relationship to academic passion, optimism, and hope among university students: A modeling of the relationships. Journal of the College of Education in Psychological Sciences. Ain Shams University. 2020;44(3):291–372. doi: 10.21608/jfeps.2021.140228 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Creswell JW, Cresswell JD. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oxford RL. Language learning strategies. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press. 2001. p. 166–72. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511667206.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Donaldson SI, Csikszentmihalyi M, Nakamura J. Applied Positive Psychology. Routledge. 2011. doi: 10.4324/9780203818909 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suleiman T. The importance of integrating art into the STEAM program and its impact on academic achievement. Education magazine. 2021;50(202):55–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Al-Arabi N. The role of art in the lives of people with disabilities with the forced digital transformation. Childhood and Development Magazine. 2020;(39):151–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rivera R. Art therapy for individuals with severe mental illness. Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Southern California. 2008. Available from: https://bit.ly/3TiP4PI [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Diehls V. Art therapy, substance abuse, and the stages of change. MA Thesis, the Department of Psychology and Special Education, Emporia State University. 2008. Umi. N. 1455689. file:///C:/Users/GHald/Downloads/out.pdf

Decision Letter 0

Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler

16 Apr 2025

-->PONE-D-24-59201-->-->The Relationship between Artistic Skills and Academic Engagement among Artistically Gifted Non-Specialist University Students-->-->PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Aldhorman,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 31 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:-->

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

-->If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

3. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and in Supporting Information files.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please review the reviewers' comments and make any suggested corrections.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

-->Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. -->

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

-->3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.-->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)-->

Reviewer #1: Dear Author,

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. Below are the comments on my review:

1. The subject matter of the article is relevant to be published in the journal. However, it needs some revisions.

2. The title clearly reflects the subject matter of the article.

3. The abstract and keywords provide good information about the article. The subject matter, the objective of the research, the methodology used, the main results and conclusions are mentioned.

4. Check whether all authors cited in the article are in the manuscript’s references, and vice versa.

5. The article has problems with clarity and coherence in its language, which need to be revised. In the Introduction, it is important to make clear what the objective of the research is, and the reasons that led to the development of this study. In the methodology, it is necessary to make clear some points:

- What was the same question asked to the students and to the members of the university’s Gifted Care Unit Council? Was it appropriate to ask the same question? Make it clear which colleges the participating students attended (this was confusing).

Regarding the conclusions, make it clear whether the questions asked were answered. It is also important to mention the relevance of the research developed in the conclusion.

6. There is articulation between the theme and the theoretical basis. There is an interesting dialogue with the scientific literature in the area, but this discussion could be further explored.

7. There is analysis of the data and coherence in the argument. The data is organized, categorized, and analyzed. Something stands out: in the students' feedback regarding group artistic activities, only 18% responded about ways to promote their ASs. It is important to analyze this, because the study covers artistic skills and academic engagement. What does the scientific literature say about this? Could it be because some participating students did not come from arts colleges? (Make this information clearer in the methodology).

8. The bibliography used in the article is adequate and up-to-date.

It is an interesting study. However, I hope these comments help improve your manuscript.

Reviewer #2: 1. Research Value

Strengths:

The study addresses the relationship between artistic skills and academic engagement among non-specialist students with artistic talent. It adopts an interdisciplinary and policy-relevant perspective, offering practical implications for supporting cross-disciplinary artistic development in higher education institutions.

Suggestions:

The manuscript lacks a more thorough theoretical discussion and definition of “artistically gifted non-specialist students,” especially regarding selection and evaluation criteria. It is recommended to supplement the conceptual framework with references to talent identification systems.Clarify the novelty and theoretical contribution of this study compared to existing literature.

2. Methodology

Strengths:The use of a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews is appropriate and strengthens the depth of the research. The questionnaire design is sound and informed by relevant literature, with appropriate construct validation.

Suggestions:

(1)More detail is needed regarding the validation of the questionnaire. Was exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis conducted?

(2)The sample is relatively limited (one university, one unit). Consider explicitly addressing this limitation and recommending broader sampling in future studies.

(3)The description of qualitative analysis is too brief. It is advisable to explain the coding process, theme extraction method, and whether triangulation or inter-coder reliability was used.

3. Data Analysis and Statistical Interpretation

Strengths: The use of descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis is appropriate and generally well explained. The tripartite structure of artistic skills—cognitive, performance, and emotional—is useful for nuanced interpretation.

Suggestions:The regression models show low explanatory power (R² = 0.11–0.13). This should be more thoroughly discussed in terms of potential unmeasured mediators or moderators. The manuscript does not report whether multicollinearity was tested. Including VIF or tolerance values would enhance the robustness of the regression results.

4. Structure and Results Presentation

Strengths:Tables are clear and well-organized. Psychometric results (reliability and validity) are properly included. Integration of qualitative and quantitative results is smooth.

Suggestions:Some sections (Results and Discussion) are slightly repetitive. Consider refining to avoid restating the same results. Using visual aids such as conceptual diagrams or figures could improve clarity and enhance reader engagement.

5. Writing Quality

Strengths:The manuscript is generally well-written, logically structured, and linguistically competent. References are comprehensive and support the arguments.

Suggestions:Some phrases are overly wordy. For example, “students who are aware that they have artistic skills and students who have artistic skills but are unaware of them” could be simplified. A final round of proofreading is recommended to ensure conciseness and stylistic coherence.

**********

-->6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .-->

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Gustavo Cunha de Araujo

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.-->

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0329483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329483.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


11 Jun 2025

Response to academic editor and reviewers

The academic editor

Ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements

Addressed

Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript.

Funding information was removed from the manuscript.

We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and in Supporting Information files.

Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly.

Data were provided as supporting information files.

Captions were provided at the end of the manuscript.

Review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. Addressed

Documentation (in-text citations and references) was modified to be in accordance with the journal’s adopted system.

A repeated reference (No. 15) was removed and so numbers of references were changed in the text.

Reviewer 1

Check whether all authors cited in the article are in the manuscript’s references, and vice versa. Checked

The article has problems with clarity and coherence in its language, which need to be revised. In the Introduction, it is important to make clear what the objective of the research is, and the reasons that led to the development of this study. In the methodology, it is necessary to make clear some points:

- What was the same question asked to the students and to the members of the university’s Gifted Care Unit Council? Was it appropriate to ask the same question? Make it clear which colleges the participating students attended (this was confusing).

The article was checked for clarity and coherence.

The research objective was clarified in the introduction.

The open-ended question is mentioned in the abstract and the study design section: “The questionnaire also had an open-ended question about ways to promote students’ ASs”.

The same question had to be asked for the joint qualitative analysis of both samples’ responses. The researcher wished to identify the suggestions of both the students and the staff members regarding how to enhance students’ talents.

Students’ colleges are mentioned in the participants section.

Reviewer 2

The manuscript lacks a more thorough theoretical discussion and definition of “artistically gifted non-specialist students,” especially regarding selection and evaluation criteria. It is recommended to supplement the conceptual framework with references to talent identification systems. Clarify the novelty and theoretical contribution of this study compared to existing literature.

A section was added in the introduction with the heading “Research Context”. A more thorough discussion and definition of artistically gifted non-specialist students is provided in this section.

The description of qualitative analysis is too brief. It is advisable to explain the coding process, theme extraction method, and whether triangulation or inter-coder reliability was used. More details were added in the article.

As to the extraction method, the analysis was conducted by the researcher, given that the task was simple: what are the suggestions offered by students or staff members? It was a matter of how many students or staff members mentioned each suggestion.

The regression models show low explanatory power (R² = 0.11–0.13). This should be more thoroughly discussed in terms of potential unmeasured mediators or moderators. The manuscript does not report whether multicollinearity was tested. Including VIF or tolerance values would enhance the robustness of the regression results.

VIF values for the variables were added, which do not show any multicollinearity issues.

The description of qualitative analysis is too brief. It is advisable to explain the coding process, theme extraction method, and whether triangulation or inter-coder reliability was used. The coding process explained.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0329483.s005.docx (15.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler

18 Jun 2025

-->PONE-D-24-59201R1-->-->The relationship between artistic skills and academic engagement among artistically gifted non-specialist university students-->-->PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Aldhorman,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised by the reviewers during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 02 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:-->

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

-->If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments :

The manuscript is suitable for publication but needs some minor adjustments. You have 45 days to revise and resubmit.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.-->

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0329483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329483.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


14 Jul 2025

Comment: 1. It is important that you include a cover letter with your manuscript. Please ensure that this letter is addressed specifically to PLoS ONE. Please also include

* why this manuscript is suitable for publication in PLoS ONE.

* how does your paper provide a worthwhile addition to the scientific literature?

* how does your paper relate to previously published work?

* which types of scientists do you believe will be most interested in your study?

Response: I have added a cover letter as requested.

comment 2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

Response: I have fixed this issue.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to editor.docx

pone.0329483.s006.docx (12.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler

17 Jul 2025

-->-->La relación entre las habilidades artísticas y el compromiso académico entre estudiantes universitarios no especialistas con talento artístico -->-->

-->-->PONE-D-24-59201R2-->-->

-->-->Estimado Dr. Ghozeail Aldhorman-->-->

-->-->Nos complace informarle que su manuscrito ha sido evaluado científicamente como adecuado para su publicación y será aceptado formalmente para su publicación.-->-->

-->-->Se generará una factura cuando su artículo sea aceptado formalmente. Tenga en cuenta que, si su institución tiene un acuerdo editorial con PLOS y su artículo cumple con los criterios pertinentes, se cubrirán todos o parte de los costos de publicación. Asegúrese de que su información de usuario esté actualizada iniciando sesión en Editorial -->-->-->-->Manager®-->--> -->-->  y haciendo clic en el enlace "Actualizar mi información" en la parte superior de la página. Si tiene alguna pregunta sobre los cargos de publicación, comuníquese directamente con nuestro departamento de Facturación a Autores en authorbilling@plos.org.-->-->

-->-->Si su institución cuenta con una oficina de prensa, por favor, infórmeles sobre su próximo artículo para maximizar su impacto. Si van a preparar material de prensa, por favor, informe a nuestro equipo de prensa lo antes posible, en un plazo máximo de 48 horas tras recibir la aceptación formal. Su manuscrito permanecerá bajo estricto embargo de prensa hasta las 14:00 h (hora del este) del día de publicación. Para más información, por favor, contacte con onepress@plos.org.-->-->

-->-->Atentamente,-->-->

-->-->Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler, Ph.D. -->-->

-->-->Editora académica -->-->

-->-->de PLOS ONE-->-->

-->-->Comentarios adicionales del editor (opcional):-->-->

-->-->Comentarios de los revisores:-->-->

Acceptance letter

Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler

PONE-D-24-59201R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Aldhorman,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ruth Nayibe Cardenas Soler

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. The questionnaire.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0329483.s001.docx (14.6KB, docx)
    S2 Data. Raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0329483.s002.xlsx (26.3KB, xlsx)
    S3 Data. Quantified data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0329483.s003.xlsx (26.4KB, xlsx)
    S4 Data. Data analysis.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0329483.s004.xlsx (24KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0329483.s005.docx (15.7KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to editor.docx

    pone.0329483.s006.docx (12.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES