Abstract
Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins assemble into genetically linked pairs to mediate effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in plants. Here, we characterize the paired NLRs NRCX and NARY (NRCX adjacent resistance gene Y) in Nicotiana benthamiana. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of NRCX caused severe dwarfism and constitutively activated immunity, marked by PR1 upregulation and enhanced resistance to Phytophthora capsici. Co-silencing or double knockout of the adjacent NLR NARY partially rescued the nrcx phenotype, revealing NARY as a compensatory regulator that modulates growth and immunity. Structural analysis revealed that NARY harbors non-canonical Walker B and MHD motifs, which lack autoactivation capacity despite their divergence from canonical NLR executors. Split-luciferase and co-immunoprecipitation assays showed that NRCX and NARY interact exclusively through their CC domains, forming a non-canonical regulatory complex. Notably, simultaneous silencing of NRC2/3 and NARY incompletely restored growth in nrcx mutants, implicating additional factors in immune modulation. Our findings establish NARY as a compensatory NLR partner of NRCX that fine-tunes immunity without triggering cell death, revealing a novel mechanism for balancing growth and defense in Solanaceae.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44154-025-00245-6.
Keywords: NRCX/NARY, Paired NLR, Growth-defense trade-off
Introduction
Plants have evolved a multi-layered immune system to defend against microbial pathogens, with intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins serving as critical sensors for pathogen detection. These receptors recognize pathogen-derived effectors through direct or indirect interactions, initiating effector-triggered immunity (ETI), a robust defense response often accompanied by localized programmed cell death, a process known as the hypersensitive response (HR), to limit pathogen spread (Dodds and Rathjen 2010; Jones and Dangl 2006). A key feature of NLR-mediated immunity is the formation of genetically linked pairs, where a sensor NLR detects effectors and associates physically with a partner executor NLR to transmit immune signals (Cesari et al. 2014). Executor NLRs often contain degenerated nucleotide-binding motifs, such as Walker B and MHD, making them dependent on their cognate sensors to avoid autoactivation while enabling rapid signal amplification upon effector recognition (Marchal et al. 2022; van Ooijen et al. 2008).
The Solanaceae family displays a unique evolutionary pattern in NLR biology, characterized by the expansion of NRC (NLR required for cell death) helper networks (Goh et al. 2024; Sakai et al. 2024). These NRC proteins act as central signaling nodes, integrating inputs from diverse sensor NLRs to coordinate defense responses (Wu et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2019). Yet, how genetically paired NLRs have become functionally specialized within this lineage remains unclear. In non-Solanaceae species, canonical executor-sensor pairs like rice RGA4/RGA5 depend on conserved motifs and hierarchical interactions (Cesari et al. 2014). In contrast, Solanaceae NLR pairs may have evolved distinct regulatory strategies, potentially diverging from these conserved mechanisms to interact with the lineage-specific NRC networks (Adachi et al. 2019; Wu et al. 2017). Previous research identified that knockout of NRCX, an atypical NLR modulator in Nicotiana benthamiana, leads to severe dwarfism, suggesting its role in balancing growth and immune responses (Adachi et al. 2023). Unlike canonical NRC helper NLRs such as NRC2/3/4, NRCX functions as a modulator rather than a core signaling hub, but the molecular pathways through which it influences plant growth remain unclear.
NLRs share a basic protein architecture, consisting of a variable N-terminal domain, a central nucleotide-binding domain (NB-ARC), and a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat domain (LRR) (Takken and Goverse 2012). The NB-ARC domain can be further subdivided into three subdomains: NB, ARC1, and ARC2 (Takken and Goverse 2012). The NB subdomain contains two major motifs: a P-loop motif required for nucleotide binding and a Walker B motif required for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis (Kim et al. 2005). Additionally, the ARC2 subdomain harbors an MHD motif (methionine-histidine-aspartate) within the nucleotide-binding site (Williams et al. 2011). Mutations in the Walker B or MHD motifs of NLRs frequently result in constitutive autoactivation (van Ooijen et al. 2008). For instance, substituting the conserved second aspartate with glutamate in I-2 reduces ATP hydrolysis rates and triggers autoactivation. Notably, many executor NLRs exhibit non-canonical MHD motifs, which are associated with their autoactivation capacity (van Ooijen et al. 2008). For example, the MHD motif of RGA4 is "TYG", a highly divergent variant that differs from the canonical MHD sequence. Replacing this divergent motif with a canonical MHD motif abolishes RGA4 autoactivity (Cesari et al. 2014).
Here, we investigate a previously uncharacterized NLR pair in N. benthamiana. NRCX and its adjacent head-to-head partner, NARY. Building on prior work showing that NRCX loss causes dwarfism (Adachi et al. 2023), our study demonstrates that co-silencing NARY partially rescues the developmental and immune phenotypes of nrcx mutants, indicating a compensatory regulatory partnership distinct from classical executor-sensor pairs. Structural analyses reveal that NARY harbors non-canonical Walker B and MHD motifs yet lacks the ability to induce autoactive cell death. Instead, NARY interacts with NRCX exclusively through their coiled-coil (CC) domains, forming a heterocomplex that modulates immunity without triggering HR. Our findings uncover a non-canonical regulatory mechanism in Solanaceae, where a novel regulatory mechanism in Solanaceae NLR biology, where atypical motif configurations and domain-specific interactions enable NLR pairs to balance immune activation with growth homeostasis, expanding the functional repertoire of plant immune receptors.
Results
NRCX knockout in N. benthamiana confers dwarfism and enhanced disease resistance
During a genome-wide NLR silencing screen using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in Nicotiana benthamiana (Dong et al. 2025), we observed pronounced dwarfism in plants silencing a subset of NLR genes, including NRCX (NLR-required for cell death X) (Fig. S1A,B, NbD037153.1 used as a control). While NRCX-dependent dwarfism was previously reported (Adachi et al. 2023), we extended these findings by generating nrcx knockout mutants via CRISPR/Cas9. These mutants confirmed that the phenotype was intrinsic to NRCX loss-of-function and not an artifact of VIGS or viral infection (Fig. 1A,B and Fig. S1C,D).
Fig. 1.
Growth defects and enhanced resistance in nrcx mutants. A Schematic of NRCX deletion in Nicotiana benthamiana. Genomic organization of NRCX (top) with the guide RNA (gRNA) target site and sequencing-confirmed 7-bp deletion in nrcx mutants (bottom). B Phenotypic comparison of wild-type (WT) and nrcx knockout plants after 30 days of soil cultivation. Bar = 2 cm. C Growth phenotypes of WT and nrcx seedlings on sterile 1/2 MS medium at three weeks post-germination. Bar = 2 cm. D,E Quantification of stem and root lengths in WT and nrcx mutants grown on 1/2 MS medium (means ± SD; n = 7; **, P ≤ 0.01; Student’s t-test). F,G Enhanced pathogen resistance in nrcx mutants. UV fluorescence imaging of Phytophthora capsici-inoculated leaves at 24 h post-inoculation (hpi) and lesion area quantification (means ± SD; n = 12; **, P ≤ 0.01; Student’s t-test). Bar = 2 cm. H PR1 expression upregulation in nrcx mutants (means ± SD; n = 3; **, P ≤ 0.01; Student’s t-test)
Strikingly, nrcx mutants maintained their dwarf stature even under axenic growth conditions (Fig. 1C), demonstrating that the phenotype arises spontaneously and is independent of microbiome interactions. This observation is consistent with the NLR deficiency-induced autoimmune phenotype reported in previous studies (Cheng et al. 2024). Tissue-specific analysis revealed stronger growth suppression in roots versus shoots (Fig. 1D,E), aligning with prior reports of elevated NRCX expression in root tissues (Adachi et al. 2023).
To probe the immunological consequences of NRCX disruption, we challenged mutants with the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora capsici (strain LT263). nrcx plants exhibited significantly enhanced resistance compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 1F,G). This heightened defense correlated with constitutive activation of immune markers, as evidenced by ~ ten fold upregulation of PR1 (Pathogenesis-Related Protein 1) transcripts in uninfected nrcx mutants (Fig. 1H).
Simultaneous silencing of NARY partially rescues the NRCX-silenced plant phenotype
Knockout of one component in paired NLRs may activate their cognate NLR partner, triggering defense pathway induction and growth inhibition (van Wersch et al. 2020). We further characterized NRC helper NLRs and quantified paired NLRs across representative plant species (Fig. S2A,B). Similar to previous report, our data supported that NRC helper NLRs underwent lineage-specific expansion within the Lamiids clade of Asterids (Fig. S2A) (Goh et al. 2024; Kolli 2024; Sakai et al. 2024). N. benthamiana possesses only three NLR pairs: NRCX and its adjacent head-to-head partner, NARY (NRCX-adjacent resistance protein Y), NbD002668.1/NbD002669.1, and NbD026701.1/NbD026704.1 (Fig. S2, S3 A). As paired NLRs typically function as units, knockout/knockdown of one partner may active the other, resulting in dwarfism and enhanced resistance phenotypes (Wang et al. 2019). Intriguingly, distinct dwarfism was observed exclusively upon NRCX silencing (Fig. S3B,C).
NARY and NRCX are arranged in a head-to-head orientation separated by an 18,795 bp intergenic region (Fig. S4A). We hypothesized that NRCX silencing might activate NARY, thereby inducing defense responses contributing to dwarfism. To test this, we co-silenced NRCX and NARY using a single TRV vector containing both genes (Fig. S4B). Compared to TRV-NRCX (TRV-X) plants, TRV-NRCX/NARY (TRV-X/Y) plants exhibited significantly reduced growth inhibition, though remained smaller than TRV-GUS (β-glucuronidase) controls (Fig. S4C-E).
Subsequent immune response evaluation revealed that PR1 expression was markedly lower in NRCX/NARY-silenced plants compared to TRV-X plants (Fig. S4F). These findings suggest NARY positively regulates immunity and partially mediates dwarfism in NRCX-silenced plants.
Double knockout of NRCX and NARY partially rescues nrcx phenotype
Using CRISPR/Cas9, we generated double NRCX/NARY knockouts (xy-1–1 and xy-5–1) and single NARY knockouts (y-5–9 and y-5–14) (Fig. S5A,B). T2 generation plants with stable inheritance were used for subsequent analyses. Double knockouts partially rescued the nrcx phenotype (Fig. 2A-D vs Fig. 1B), showing WT-compared height but significantly smaller leaves (Fig. 2A-D vs Fig. 1B). Notably, single NARY knockouts were taller than WT plants while maintaining the same leaf size (Fig. 2A-D), suggesting NARY may act as a negative growth regulator.
Fig. 2.
Knockout of NARY partially rescues NRCX-knockout phenotype. A,B Morphology of the indicated mutants. Photographs were taken 6 weeks after transplanting the plants. Bars = 2 cm. C Height of the indicated mutants. Data are means ± SD (n ≥ 9; lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups as determined by one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). D Leaf diameter of the indicated mutants. Data are means ± SD (n ≥ 32; lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups as determined by one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). E Detection of PR1 gene expression in indicated mutants (means ± SD; n = 3; **, P ≤ 0.01; Student’s t-test). F Photograph of mutant leaves inoculated with P. capsici zoospores at 36 hpi under UV light. Bars = 1 cm. G Lesion areas on the indicated leaves caused by P. capsici. Data are means ± SD (n ≥ 13; lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups as determined by one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05)
The relative expression levels of the PR1 gene demonstrated significant upregulation in both the NRCX single knockout and NRCX/NARY double knockout mutants compared to the wild type (Fig. 2E). In contrast, the NARY single knockout mutant showed no significant difference in PR1 gene expression relative to the wild type (Fig. 2E). Pathogen resistance assays using P. capsici inoculation revealed enhanced susceptibility in single NARY knockouts, displaying larger lesion areas than WT (Fig. 2F,G). Conversely, double knockouts exhibited improved resistance with reduced disease progression compared to WT (Fig. 2F,G), indicating NARY positively regulates immunity against P. capsici.
Simultaneous silencing of NRC2, NRC3, and NARY fails to fully restore the phenotype of NRCX-silenced plants
Previous studies demonstrated that knockout of NRC2 and NRC3 partially rescues the dwarf phenotype caused by NRCX silencing (Adachi et al. 2023). To determine whether combined silencing of NRC2, NRC3, and NARY could fully restore the NRCX-silenced phenotype, we performed VIGS in wild-type N. benthamiana using TRV constructs targeting NRC2/NRC3 (TRV-2/3), NRC2/NRC3/NRCX (TRV-2/3/X), and NRC2/NRC3/NRCX/NARY (TRV-2/3/X/Y) (Fig. S6A). Plants subjected to TRV-2/3/X/Y showed rescue of the dwarf phenotype compared to TRV-2/3/X plants, but failed to fully restore growth to the level observed in TRV-2/3 controls (Fig. S6A-D).
To further validate these findings, we conducted parallel VIGS experiments in both wild-type and nrc2/3/4 knockout mutants. Silencing NRCX alone (TRV-X) in wild-type and nrc2/3/4 plants resulted in severe dwarfism, while co-silencing NRCX and NARY (TRV-X/Y) significantly improved growth in both genetic backgrounds (Fig. S6E). Notably, TRV-X/Y-treated wild-type and nrc2/3/4 mutant plants exhibited comparable sizes, indicating that NRC2/3/4 loss does not further enhance the phenotypic rescue (Fig. S6E). These results demonstrate that simultaneous silencing of NRC2, NRC3, and NARY incompletely rescues the NRCX-silenced phenotype, suggesting the involvement of additional regulators beyond these NLRs in modulating growth outcomes.
NRCX/NARY pair is specific to Solanaceae species
NRCX homologs in B. vulgaris occupy a phylogenetically basal position in the Asterid lineage (Fig. S7), consistent with the reported Asterid-specific distribution of NRCX (Adachi et al. 2023). NARY homologs showed broader conservation across dicots (Fig. S7). The NRCX/NARY locus exhibits distinct genomic organization across plant species. In N. benthamiana, N. tabacum, Solanum pennellii, S. lycopersicum, S. tuberosum, and Ipomoea cyaneum, NRCX and NARY are adjacent on the same chromosome (Fig. 3). In contrast, their homologs in Beta vulgaris reside on separate chromosomes, while those in Coffea canephora are spaced 152 genes apart. This conserved physical linkage of NRCX/NARY in Solanaceae species correlates with their compensatory functional interaction, as demonstrated by phenotypic rescue assays.
Fig. 3.
Schematic diagram of NRCX and NARY in plant genomes. Genomic organization of NRCX and NARY across different plant species, with phylogenetic relationships displayed as an evolutionary tree on the left. The relative positions and orientations of NRCX (gray) and NARY (blue) are shown
The Walker B and MHD motifs of NARY are non-canonical
The NB-ARC domain of NLRs contains critical motifs (P-loop, Walker B, MHD) required for ATP hydrolysis and autoactivation (van Ooijen et al. 2008). Sequence analysis of the 881-aa NARY CNL protein revealed a canonical P-loop (GxxxxGK[T/S]) but non-canonical Walker B and MHD motifs (Fig. 4A). The Walker B motif possesses a glutamate substitution at the conserved aspartate position, a mutation known to impair ATP hydrolysis (Tameling et al. 2006). The MHD motif is fully degenerate, with all three residues deviating from the consensus (Fig. 4A). Phylogenetic comparisons showed that NARY homologs in Arabidopsis, kiwifruit, and B. vulgaris retain canonical motifs, whereas partial degeneration occurs in Coffea homologs and complete degeneration in Solanaceae species (Fig. S7). These results suggest progressive degeneration of Walker B and MHD motifs during NLR evolution in Solanaceae, potentially uncoupling ATPase activity from autoactivation.
Fig. 4.
NARY does not induce hypersensitive response (HR) in N. benthamiana. A Sequence alignment of P-loop, Walker B and MHD motifs in NLR proteins (NRC3, NRCX, NARY, RGA4). Canonical residues are highlighted in blue, non-canonical residues in red. B Cell death phenotypes in leaves expressing NARY. GFP (negative control) and INF1 (positive control) were expressed for comparison. C Immunoblot analysis of NARY-HA protein accumulation in N. benthamiana leaves at 36 h post-agroinfiltration (hpi). Total protein loading was verified by Ponceau S staining. D Cell death induced by NRC3 mutants. Autoactive NRC3D480 V (positive control) and chimeric mutants (NRC3EDV, NRC3LVG, NRC3EDV+LVG) carrying NARY motifs were analyzed. Protein levels of variants are shown below. E Phenotypes of leaves expressing NARY mutants (NARYVHV, NARYVRD) at 5 days post-infiltration (dpi). F Immunoblot confirmation of NARY mutant protein accumulation
NARY lacks autoactivation capacity despite degenerate motifs
To test whether NARY’s non-canonical motifs confer autoactivation, we transiently expressed the protein in N. benthamiana. No cell death was observed when expressing NARY in leaves, regardless of whether the protein was fused to a tag (Fig. 4B). Western blot analysis indicated that NARY was expressed correctly (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that, like NRCX (Adachi et al. 2023), NARY does not possess the ability to auto-induce cell death.
These results motivated us to investigate whether the Walker B and MHD motifs of NARY are auto-activating mutants. Domain-swapping experiments replacing Walker B and/or MHD motifs of NRC3 with those of NARY (generating NRC3EDV, NRC3LVG, and NRC3EDV+LVG) also failed to induce cell death, unlike the autoactive NRC3D480 V control (Fig. 4D). Artificial restoration of canonical MHD motifs in NARY (NARYVHV, NARYVRD) similarly did not trigger cell death (Fig. 4E, F). These data demonstrate that NARY's degenerate motifs are not autoactivating mutations, implicating additional regulatory mechanisms for its activation.
Physical interaction between NRCX and NARY via CC domains
While paired NLR genes generally show genomic colocalization and physical interactions (Adachi et al. 2019; Jubic et al. 2019), the NRCX/NARY pair lacks hallmarks of canonical autoactivating NLRs. To explore functional crosstalk, we first interrogated their physical association using split-luciferase complementation assays. A strong interaction signal was detected between NRCX and NARY in planta (Fig. 5B). Intriguingly, NRCX exhibited self-complementation signal, whereas no self-complementation was detected for NARY (Fig. 5B). “NARY-nLUC + YFP-cLUC” as a negative control (Fig. 5B). Coexpression of NARY significantly attenuated the self-complementation signal of NRCX (Fig. 5B), suggesting competitive binding at the interaction interface. This heteromeric interaction was corroborated by co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays (Fig. 5C).
Fig. 5.
Interactions between NRCX and NARY. A Domain architecture of NRCX and NARY, highlighting coiled-coil (CC), NB-ARC (nucleotide-binding adaptor shared by APAF-1, R proteins, and CED-4), and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains. Domain boundaries (amino acid positions) are indicated in the schematic. B Split-luciferase complementation assay confirming NRCX-NARY interaction. Agrobacterium strains carrying NRCX-nLUC and NARY-cLUC were co-infiltrated into distinct leaf sectors (constructs labeled adjacent to infiltration sites). C Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) demonstrates NRCX interacts with NARY. Total protein extracts from N. benthamiana leaves co-expressing NRCX-FLAG and NARY-Myc were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG beads, and probed with anti-Myc antibodies. D Co-IP reveals CC domain-mediated interaction. NRCX-CC-HA and NARY-CC-FLAG were co-expressed, immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG beads, and detected via anti-HA antibodies. E Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay validates NRCX-CC/NARY-CC interaction. The Ev/p53 pair served as a positive interaction control. F Split-luciferase assay further confirms NRCX-CC/NARY-CC interaction. FLS2-nLUC + AGB1-cLUC was included as a positive control
To map interacting domains, we systematically analyzed the CC, NB-ARC, and LRR domains through Co-IP, split-luciferase, and yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays (Fig. 5A). All approaches convergently demonstrated that the CC domains of NRCX and NARY exclusively mediated their interaction (Fig. 5D-F).
Discussion
This study identifies a paired NLR system, NRCX/NARY, that co-regulates both growth and P. capsici resistance in N. benthamiana (Fig. 6). NLRs commonly function cooperatively within intricate signaling networks (Contreras et al. 2023). Canonical paired NLRs, typically genomically adjacent, include rice RGA5/RGA4 and Pik-1/Pik-2, which mediate resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae (Cesari et al. 2014; De la Concepcion et al. 2021; Zdrzalek et al. 2020), and Arabidopsis RRS1/RPS4, which confers immunity against Pseudomonas syringae (Narusaka et al. 2009). Similarly, the wheat NLR pair RXL/Pm5e confers powdery mildew resistance (Guo et al. 2025). Silencing experiments revealed distinct functional divergence: while knockout of one component of rice NLR pairs often induces lesion-mimicking or dwarfing phenotypes (Wang et al. 2019), N. benthamiana exhibits severe developmental defects exclusively upon NRCX silencing (Adachi et al. 2023).
Fig. 6.
Schematic model of NRCX/NARY-mediated regulation of growth and immunity in N. benthamiana. In the depicted balance model, the fulcrum is jointly supported by NRCX (blue) and NARY (red), with knocked-out genes represented by gray models and text. The dark blue circle on the left side of the balance symbolizes “Growth,” while the dark yellow circle on the right represents “Resistance” of N. benthamiana against P. capsici. In wild-type N. benthamiana, Growth and Resistance remain balanced, as indicated by the identical diameters of the dark blue and dark yellow circles. The circle diameter reflects relative weight, with larger diameters corresponding to heavier weights that tilt the balance toward the respective side. Both NRCX and NARY contain CC, NBC, and LRR domains, with their CC domains interacting physically, illustrated by direct contact between their CC termini. Dashed lines denote hypothesized pathways: arrowheads indicate activation, while bar-ended lines represent suppression. A white question mark enclosed in a gray ellipse suggests the potential involvement of additional regulatory factors cooperating with NRCX in immune regulation
The NRCX/NARY pair functions primarily as immune modulators. Canonical paired NLRs exhibit distinct roles, where sensor NLRs recognize effectors via integrated domains (e.g., HAM or WRKY), while executors activate immune responses, including cell death (De la Concepcion et al. 2021; Kanzaki et al. 2012; Sarris et al. 2015; Zdrzalek et al. 2020). However, neither NRCX nor NARY contains effector-recognition domains such as HAM or WRKY. Notably, mutations in the Walker B motif (hhhDD/E) and MHD motif of NARY failed to induce a hypersensitive response in N. benthamiana (Gao et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2015; Williams et al. 2011; Wu et al. 2019). Despite possessing a non-canonical Walker B (LIVLEDV) and MHD motif (LVG), NARY cannot trigger cell death, further supporting its role as a modulator rather than an executor. Nevertheless, NRCX/NARY retains key features of paired NLRs: (1) their "head-to-head" genomic arrangement, (2) the induction of a dwarf phenotype upon NRCX knockout—a hallmark of sensor NLR disruption, contrasting with the typical helper-NRC role, and (3) their interaction via CC domains, as observed in other paired NLR systems (Guo et al. 2025).
Beyond NRC2, NRC3, and NARY, additional factors influence the dwarfing and resistance phenotypes observed in NRCX knockouts. Adachi et al. reported that silencing NRC2 and NRC3 partially rescues the dwarf phenotype caused by NRCX silencing (Adachi et al. 2023). Our study further reveals that co-silencing NARY significantly enhances this phenotypic rescue. Parallel studies in Arabidopsis revealed analogous complexity: while knockout of EDS1 fully rescues the dwarf phenotype of snc1 mutants, simultaneous knockout of SAG101-1 and NRG1 A/B/C only partially restores growth, indicating non-redundant roles for these genes in modulating immunity-associated developmental trade-offs (Wu et al. 2022).Similarly, in our study, simultaneous silencing of NRC2, NRC3, NARY, and NRCX failed to fully restore the wild-type phenotype in N. benthamiana, implying the involvement of additional factors or regulatory layers.
The immune signaling pathway regulated by NRCX/NARY warrants further investigation. In Solanaceae, lineage-specific expansions of NRC helper networks and associated sensor NLRs exemplify functional specialization (Goh et al. 2024; Wu et al. 2017). NRCX likely forms resistosomes as an NRC family member (Liu et al. 2024; Ma et al. 2024). However, NLRs may also form hetero-oligomeric complexes, as demonstrated by the paired immune receptors CHS3-CSA1 in plants (Yang et al. 2024) and the wheat NLR pair RXL/Pm5e, which preferentially forms hetero-complexes via CC-domain interactions (Guo et al. 2025). The Pikm-1 CC domain binds AvrPik for effector recognition (Kanzaki et al. 2012). In this study, NRCX self-interaction was diminished in the presence of NARY, suggesting that NRCX/NARY-mediated immunity may operate through CC-domain interactions. However, the absence of identified effectors or cell death induction leaves unresolved whether these NLRs function via hetero- or homo-complex formation.
Post-translational modifications may further regulate NLR activity. For instance, the Arabidopsis RRS1/RPS4 complex undergoes ubiquitination of RRS1’s WRKY domain by the E3 ligase RARE, destabilizing the complex and attenuating immune signaling (Chen et al. 2025). Phosphorylation has also been implicated in NLR signaling (Guo et al. 2020; Zhong et al. 2025). Whether NRCX/NARY activity is modulated by such mechanisms remains an open question.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our work redefines the functional scope of paired NLRs by identifying NRCX/NARY as a non-canonical regulatory module. This NLR pair employs divergent motifs and CC domain-mediated interactions to fine-tune immunity without triggering cell death, distinct from both helper networks and classical effector-sensor pairs. These findings reveal a novel mechanism for calibrating immune responses through structural innovation, expanding the known functional diversity of NLR systems in balancing defense and growth.
Meterials and methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
Wild-type N. benthamiana, NRCX knockout lines, NARY knockout lines, and NRCX/NARY knockout lines were grown in a greenhouse under a 16-h photoperiod at 25℃ with 55–60% humidity. VIGS-treated N. benthamiana plants were grown in a controlled environment room at 22℃ with a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle and 55–60% relative humidity.
P. capsici culture conditions and inoculation assays
The P. capsici strain LT263 was cultured and maintained at 25℃ in the dark on 10% (v/v) V8 agar plates. For inoculation assays, mycelium blocks were placed on the abaxial surface of leaves, with 0.1% Tween 20 added at the intersection of the mycelium and leaf tissue. The leaves were incubated in the dark at 25℃ for 24–36 h. Photos were taken under UV light, and the damaged area was quantified using ImageJ software.
Plasmid construction
All plasmids and primers used for recombinant constructs in this study are listed in Table S1. NRCX and NARY were amplified from N. benthamiana genomic DNA (gDNA) and cloned into vectors such as pCambia1300-3xHA and pCambia1300-3xFlag. Primers used for cloning NRCX, NARY, NARY variants, and NRC3 variants are also provided in Table S1. Functional analyses of NARY and NRC3 were performed with untagged variants, while C-terminally tagged HA or FLAG variants produced consistent results in complementation assays.
Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS)
VIGS experiments were conducted in N. benthamiana as previously described (Ratcliff et al. 2001). Binary constructs pTRV2 were transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. The constructs were incubated at 30℃ and 220 rpm for 24 h before infiltration. Agrobacterium cells were collected by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 4 min, washed and resuspended in infiltration buffer [10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES (pH 5.7) and 200 μM acetosyringone], The optical density (OD600) was adjusted to 0.5. Two-week-old N. benthamiana plants were infiltrated with a 1:1 suspension of Agrobacterium carrying TRV RNA1 and TRV RNA2.
Transient gene expression and cell death assays
Binary expression plasmids were introduced into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 by electroporation. Four-week-old N. benthamiana plants were used for transient expression. Agrobacterium suspension was prepared as described in the VIGS protocol above.
RT-qPCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from plants using a RNA-simple Total RNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). DNA contamination was removed using 4 × gDNA wiper (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). For cDNA synthesis, 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI Prism 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Gene expression levels were normalized to NbEF1a, a stably expressed reference gene in N. benthamiana. The primers used for RT-PCR are listed in Table S1.
Cultivation of N. benthamiana seedlings on 1/2 MS medium
Tobacco seeds (60) were sterilized by sequential treatment with 75% ethanol for 30 s, followed by three washes with sterile water. Seeds were then disinfected with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 8 min and washed six times with sterile water. The seeds were evenly distributed on 1/2 MS medium (0.8% agar, pH 5.7) and sealed. The medium was placed horizontally at 4℃ for 3 days to break dormancy, then transferred to the greenhouse to promote germination. Seedlings were photographed after 2–3 weeks.
Protein extraction of N. benthamiana leaves
For western blot analysis, protein extraction was performed using buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM KCL, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100; pH 7.5), supplemented with 1 mM DL-Dithiothreitol (DTT) and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). N. benthamiana leaves were frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground to a fine powder, and 1 mL of extraction buffer was added per 0.5 g of tissue. The mixture was vortexed, incubated at 4℃ for 30 min to allow full lysis, and then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4℃. To prepare samples for SDS-PAGE, 80 μL of 5 × sample loading buffer was added, mixed, and same protocol was followed for input samples, and the remaining supernatant was incubated with target beads.
Western blot
Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane using eBlot™ L1 (GenScript Corporation). Anti-HA (1:5,000; #M20013; Abmart Inc., Shanghai, China) and anti-FLAG (1:5,000; #M20018; Abmart) antibodies were used to detect proteins with the corresponding tags. Total protein levels were assessed by Ponceau staining.
Split-luciferase assay
The coding sequences of the indicated genes were cloned into pCAMBIA1300-35S-HA-Nluc-RBS or pCAMBIA1300-35S-Cluc-RBS vectors and transferred into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101. Constructs were co-expressed in N. benthamiana plants (OD600 = 0.5). At 2 days post-infiltration (dpi), the leaves were treated with 1 mM luciferin (Biovision) and luciferase activity was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek, Beijing, China).
Yeast two-hybrid system
pGBKT7-Bait or pGADT7-Prey constructs were transformed into the yeast strain AH109. Co-transformed yeast was plated on double dropout medium (SD-LW) and incubated at 28℃ for 3 days. Colonies that grew on SD-LW plates were considered positive for successful co-transformation. Subsequently, yeast colonies were diluted to OD600 = 0.1, followed by tenfold and 100-fold dilutions. 10 μL of each dilution was spotted on SD-LW and triple dropout (SD-LWH) plates, and images were taken after incubation at 28℃ for 3 days.
Phylogenetic analysis
Multiple sequence alignments of full-length amino acid sequences were performed using MUSCLE. Phylogenetic analysis of NB-ARC sequences was conducted using the FastTree program or MEGA X program, with the maximum likelihood method, 100 bootstrap samples, and the following parameters: Poisson model, uniform rates, and complete deletion.
Accession number
The accession numbers for the sequences supporting this study are as follows: NbD037153.1, NbD002668.1, NbD002669.1, NbD026701.1, NbD026704.1, NbD022578.1 (NARY), and NbD022579.1 (NRCX), all from Nicotiana benthamiana in the Oxford University Research Archive (ORA).
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Virus-induced silencing of NRCX impairs growth in N. benthamiana. A Phenotypes of 6-week-old NbD037153.1-silenced and NRCX-silenced N. benthamiana plants. TRV constructs were agroinfiltrated at the two-leaf stage, with TRV-GUS as a control. Bar = 2 cm. B Silencing efficiency of NbD037153.1 and NRCX quantified by RT-qPCR (means ± SD; n = 3 technology replicates). C Phylogenetic tree of NRCX homologs in N. benthamiana. Bootstrap values (> 70%) from 1,000 replicates are shown at branch nodes. D Flanking sequence of the potential CRISPR target. The nrcx mutant contains a 7-bp deletion in the NRCX coding sequence, with no off-target mutations detected at predicted sites.
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Summary of predicted NLRs. The phylogeny of the 29 species is based on data from the Taxonomy Database and previous studies (Ngou et al. 2022). The numbers of NLRs, paired NLRs and NRC helper NLRs in each species are shown in boxplots alongside the species names. NLRs were identified from plant proteomes using NLRtracker (Kourelis et al. 2021). NLRtracker hits were annotated as NB-ARC domain-containing proteins that were considered NLRs. Paired NLRs were defined as NLRs in a “head-to-head” arrangement, separated by no more than two non-NLR genes. NRC helper NLRs were identified through phylogenetic analysis (Wu et al. 2017). NLRs that clustered with functionally validated NRC helpers (NRC2, NRC3, and NRC4) were classified as NRC helper NLRs.
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Silencing of paired NLRs in N. benthamiana. A Genomic organization of six paired NLRs in N. benthamiana. B Phenotypes of N. benthamiana plants following VIGS of six NLR partners. TRV constructs were agroinfiltrated into two-week-old plants, and phenotypes were recorded 4 weeks post-infiltration. TRV:GUS (β-glucuronidase) served as a control. Bar = 2 cm. C Silencing efficiency of NRCX quantified by RT-qPCR. TRV:GUS-infiltrated plants were used as controls.
Additional file 4: Figure S4. Co-silencing NARY partially rescues the dwarf phenotype of NRCX-silenced plants. A Genomic loci of NRCX and NARY, separated by 18,795 bp. Exons (green, yellow, pink for CC, NB-ARC, and LRR domains, respectively) and introns are annotated. Translation start sites are marked with inverted triangles. B TRV vector designs for NRCX (deep red) and NARY (deep blue) silencing. Target regions (~ 300 bp) are highlighted. C Silencing efficiency of NRCX and NARY (mean ± SD; n = 3; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t-test). D Phenotypes of N. benthamiana plants silenced for NRCX (TRV-X), NARY (TRV-Y), or both (TRV-X/Y). TRV-GUS was the control. Bars = 2 cm. E Leaf diameter measurements (mean ± SD; n = 16; lowercase letters indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA, **, P < 0.01). F PR1 expression in indicated leaves (mean ± SD; n = 3; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Additional file 5: Figure S5. Mutation sites in nrcx/nary (xy) and nary (y) knockout lines. A,B Genomic structures of nary (blue) and nrcx (gray) in N. benthamiana. gRNA target sites (bright yellow) and sequencing-confirmed mutations (red) are shown for wild-type, xy (double knockout), and y (nary single knockout) lines.
Additional file 6: Figure S6. Phenotypes of plants with simultaneous silencing of NRC2/3, NARY and NRCX. A Growth phenotypes of wild-type N. benthamiana subjected to VIGS targeting NRC2/NRC3 (TRV-2/3), NRC2/NRC3/NRCX (TRV-2/3/X), or NRC2/NRC3/NRCX/NARY (TRV-2/3/X/Y). Plants were agroinfiltrated with TRV constructs at the two-leaf stage (2-week-old) and imaged 9 weeks post-treatment. Bars = 1 cm. B Phenotypes of detached leaves from silenced plants. Leaves (third to fourth true leaves from the apex) were excised and arranged for comparison. Bar = 1 cm. C Quantification of leaf diameter. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 18); lowercase letters denote significant differences between groups (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). D RT-qPCR analysis of target gene silencing efficiency. Expression levels of NRC2, NRC3, NRCX, and NARY were normalized to the internal control EF1a. TRV-GUS-infiltrated plants served as negative controls. E Phenotypes of NRCX/NARY-silenced wild-type and nrc2/3/4 triple knockout mutants. Plants were treated and imaged as in (A). Bars = 1 cm.
Additional file 7: Figure S7. Phylogenetic analysis of NARY homologs. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree (RAxML v8.2.12, JTT model) of NB-ARC domains from 2189 NLRs across Solanum lycopersicum (Solyc-), Nicotiana benthamiana (NbD-), coffee (Coffea canephora, Cc-), kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa, DTZ-), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, EL-), Arabidopsis thaliana (AT-), and rice (Oryza sativa, Os-). The NARY-clade (blue) and NRCX-clade (orange) are highlighted. Domain architectures and conserved motifs (identified by MEME) of the NARY-clade are expanded at bottom right.
Additional file 8: Table S1. List of primers in this article.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Prof. Chih-Hang Wu at Academia Sinica for his thoughtful suggestions. We also deeply appreciate the invaluable support and guidance provided by Dr. Min Zhu and Prof. Xiaorong Tao at Nanjing Agricultural University. Additionally, we are grateful to Dr. Meixiang Zhang at Shaanxi Normal University for his assistance.
Abbreviations
- NARY
NRCX Adjacent resistance gene Y
- ETI
Effector-triggered immunity
- HR
Hypersensitive response
- CC
Coiled-coil
- TIR
Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain
- NRC
NLR-required for cell death
- NB-ARC
Nucleotide-binding (NB)-ARC (APAF1, R gene products, and CED-4) domain
- LRR
Leucine-rich repeat
- ID
Integrated decoy
- Sensor NLR
An NLR (nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptor) responsible for identifying effectors
- Helper NLR
A downstream NLR involved in sensor NLR-mediated immunity
- VIGS
Virus-induced gene silencing
- SD Media
Synthetic dropout media
Authors’ contributions
DD, XD and GA conceived and designed the project, jointly performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. XD, XZ, LX, YY, CX, WP, ZY and YZ performed the experiments. XD and GA analysed data. DD, XD and GA wrote and modified the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32230089, 32402315 and 32270208), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-21).
Data availability
All data and materials are available in the paper and online supplemental files.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Gan Ai, Email: Ganai@njau.edu.cn.
Daolong Dou, Email: ddou@njau.edu.cn.
References
- Adachi H, Derevnina L, Kamoun S (2019) NLR singletons, pairs, and networks: evolution, assembly, and regulation of the intracellular immunoreceptor circuitry of plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 50:121–131. 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adachi H, Sakai T, Harant A, Pai H, Honda K, Toghani A, Claeys J, Duggan C, Bozkurt TO, Wu CH, Kamoun S (2023) An atypical NLR protein modulates the NRC immune receptor network in Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS Genet 19:e1010500. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cesari S, Kanzaki H, Fujiwara T, Bernoux M, Chalvon V, Kawano Y, Shimamoto K, Dodds P, Terauchi R, Kroj T (2014) The NB-LRR proteins RGA4 and RGA5 interact functionally and physically to confer disease resistance. EMBO J 33:1941–1959. 10.15252/embj.201487923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z, Huang J, Li J, Menke FLH, Jones JDG, Guo H (2025) Reversible ubiquitination conferred by domain shuffling controls paired NLR immune receptor complex homeostasis in plant immunity. Nat Commun 16:1984. 10.1038/s41467-025-57231-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng YT, Thireault CA, Zhang L, Paasch BC, Sohrabi R, He SY (2024) Roles of microbiota in autoimmunity in Arabidopsis leaves. Nat Plants 10:1363–1376. 10.1038/s41477-024-01779-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Contreras MP, Lüdke D, Pai H, Toghani A, Kamoun S (2023) NLR receptors in plant immunity: making sense of the alphabet soup. EMBO Rep 24:e57495. 10.15252/embr.202357495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De la Concepcion JC, Vega Benjumea J, Bialas A, Terauchi R, Kamoun S, Banfield MJ (2021) Functional diversification gave rise to allelic specialization in a rice NLR immune receptor pair. eLife 10:e71662. 10.7554/elife.71662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Dodds PN, Rathjen JP (2010) Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Genet 11:539–548. 10.1038/nrg2812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong X, Lu X, Zhu H, Zhu Z, Ji P, Li X, Li T, Zhang X, Ai G, Dou D (2025) A typical NLR recognizes a family of structurally conserved effectors to confer plant resistance against adapted and non-adapted Phytophthora pathogens. Mol Plant 18:485–500. 10.1016/j.molp.2025.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao Z, Chung EH, Eitas TK, Dangl JL (2011) Plant intracellular innate immune receptor Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola 1 (RPM1) is activated at, and functions on, the plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:7619–7624. 10.1073/pnas.1104410108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goh FJ, Huang CY, Derevnina L, Wu CH (2024) NRC Immune receptor networks show diversified hierarchical genetic architecture across plant lineages. Plant Cell 36:3399–3418. 10.1093/plcell/koae179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo G, Bai K, Hou Y, Gong Z, Zhang H, Wu Q, Lu P, Li M, Dong L, Xie J et al (2025) The wheat NLR pair RXL/Pm5e confers resistance to powdery mildew. Plant Biotechnol J 23:1260–1276. 10.1111/pbi.14584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo H, Ahn HK, Sklenar J, Huang J, Ma Y, Ding P, Menke FLH, Jones JDG (2020) Phosphorylation-Regulated Activation of the Arabidopsis RRS1-R/RPS4 Immune Receptor Complex Reveals Two Distinct Effector Recognition Mechanisms. Cell Host Microbe 27:769–781. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones JD, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444:323–329. 10.1038/nature05286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jubic LM, Saile S, Furzer OJ, El Kasmi F, Dangl JL (2019) Help wanted: helper NLRs and plant immune responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 50:82–94. 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanzaki H, Yoshida K, Saitoh H, Fujisaki K, Hirabuchi A, Alaux L, Fournier E, Tharreau D, Terauchi R (2012) Arms race co-evolution of Magnaporthe oryzae AVR-Pik and rice Pik genes driven by their physical interactions. Plant J 72:894–907.10.1111/j.1365-313x.2012.05110.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim JH, Kim B, Cai L, Choi HJ, Ohgi KA, Tran C, Chen C, Chung CH, Huber O, Rose DW, Sawyers CL, Rosenfeld MG, Baek SH (2005) Transcriptional regulation of a metastasis suppressor gene by Tip60 and beta-catenin complexes. Nature 434:921–926. 10.1038/nature03452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolli R (2024) Birth and expansion of NRC immune receptors across the largest group of flowering plants. Plant Cell 36:3320–3321. 10.1093/plcell/koae185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kourelis J, Sakai T, Adachi H, Kamoun S (2021) RefPlantNLR is a comprehensive collection of experimentally validated plant disease resistance proteins from the NLR family. PloS Biol 19:e3001124. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu F, Yang Z, Wang C, You Z, Martin R, Qiao W, Huang J, Jacob P, Dangl JL, Carette JE, Luan S, Nogales E, Staskawicz BJ (2024) Activation of the helper NRC4 immune receptor forms a hexameric resistosome. Cell 187:4877–4889.e15. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma S, An C, Lawson AW, Cao Y, Sun Y, Tan EYJ, Pan J, Jirschitzka J, Kümmel F, Mukhi N, Han Z, Feng S, Wu B, Schulze-Lefert P, Chai J (2024) Oligomerization-mediated autoinhibition and cofactor binding of a plant NLR. Nature 632:869–876. 10.1038/s41586-024-07668-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marchal C, Michalopoulou VA, Zou Z, Cevik V, Sarris PF (2022) Show me your ID: NLR immune receptors with integrated domains in plants. Essays Biochem 66:527–539. 10.1042/ebc20210084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narusaka M, Shirasu K, Noutoshi Y, Kubo Y, Shiraishi T, Iwabuchi M, Narusaka Y (2009) RRS1 and RPS4 provide a dual Resistance-gene system against fungal and bacterial pathogens. Plant J 60:218–226. 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03949.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngou BPM, Heal R, Wyler M, Schmid MW, Jones JDG (2022) Concerted expansion and contraction of immune receptor gene repertoires in plant genomes. Nat Plants 8:1146–1152. 10.1038/s41477-022-01260-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratcliff F, Martin-Hernandez AM, Baulcombe DC (2001) Technical Advance. Tobacco rattle virus as a vector for analysis of gene function by silencing. Plant J 25:237–245. 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2000.00942.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakai T, Contreras MP, Martinez-Anaya C, Lüdke D, Kamoun S, Wu CH, Adachi H (2024) The NRC0 gene cluster of sensor and helper NLR immune receptors is functionally conserved across asterid plants. Plant Cell 36:3344–3361. 10.1093/plcell/koae154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarris PF, Duxbury Z, Huh SU, Ma Y, Segonzac C, Sklenar J, Derbyshire P, Cevik V, Rallapalli G, Saucet SB, Wirthmueller L, Menke FLH, Sohn KH, Jones JDG (2015) A Plant Immune Receptor Detects Pathogen Effectors that Target WRKY Transcription Factors. Cell 161:1089–1100. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takken FL, Goverse A (2012) How to build a pathogen detector: structural basis of NB-LRR function. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:375–384.10.1016/j.pbi.2012.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tameling WIL, Vossen JH, Albrecht M, Lengauer T, Berden JA, Haring MA, Cornelissen BJC, Takken FLW (2006) Mutations in the NB-ARC domain of I-2 that impair ATP hydrolysis cause autoactivation. Plant Physiol 140:1233–1245. 10.1104/pp.105.073510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Ooijen G, Mayr G, Kasiem MM, Albrecht M, Cornelissen BJ, Takken FL (2008) Structure-function analysis of the NB-ARC domain of plant disease resistance proteins. J Exp Bot 59:1383–1397. 10.1093/jxb/ern045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Wersch S, Tian L, Hoy R, Li X (2020) Plant NLRs: The Whistleblowers of Plant Immunity. Plant Commun 1:100016. 10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang GF, Ji J, El-Kasmi F, Dangl JL, Johal G, Balint-Kurti PJ (2015) Molecular and functional analyses of a maize autoactive NB-LRR protein identify precise structural requirements for activity. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004674. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Zhao L, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Jia Y, Wang G, Li S, Tian D, Li WH, Yang S (2019) Large-scale identification and functional analysis of NLR genes in blast resistance in the Tetep rice genome sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:18479–18487. 10.1073/pnas.1910229116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams SJ, Sornaraj P, deCourcy-Ireland E, Menz RI, Kobe B, Ellis JG, Dodds PN, Anderson PA (2011) An autoactive mutant of the M flax rust resistance protein has a preference for binding ATP, whereas wild-type M protein binds ADP. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:897–906. 10.1094/mpmi-03-11-0052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu CH, Abd-El-Haliem A, Bozkurt TO, Belhaj K, Terauchi R, Vossen JH, Kamoun S (2017) NLR network mediates immunity to diverse plant pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:8113–8118.10.1073/pnas.1702041114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Z, Li M, Dong OX, Xia S, Liang W, Bao Y, Wasteneys G, Li X (2019) Differential regulation of TNL-mediated immune signaling by redundant helper CNLs. New Phytol 222:938–953. 10.1111/nph.15665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Z, Tian L, Liu X, Huang W, Zhang Y, Li X (2022) The N-terminally truncated helper NLR NRG1C antagonizes immunity mediated by its full-length neighbors NRG1A and NRG1B. Plant Cell 34:1621–1640. 10.1093/plcell/koab285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y, Furzer OJ, Fensterle EP, Lin S, Zheng Z, Kim NH, Wan L, Dangl JL (2024) Paired plant immune CHS3-CSA1 receptor alleles form distinct hetero-oligomeric complexes. Science 383:eadk3468. 10.1126/science.adk3468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zdrzalek R, Kamoun S, Terauchi R, Saitoh H, Banfield MJ (2020) The rice NLR pair Pikp-1/Pikp-2 initiates cell death through receptor cooperation rather than negative regulation. PLoS ONE 15:e0238616. 10.1371/journal.pone.0238616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong C, Li W, Zhang X, Zhang D, Wen Z, Song W, Jiang Z, Gao Z, Guo H, Bi G, Liu Z, Li D, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Zhang Y (2025) A cell wall-associated kinase phosphorylates NLR immune receptor to negatively regulate resistosome formation. Nat Plants 11:561–579. 10.1038/s41477-025-01949-3 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Zhu M, van Grinsven IL, Kormelink R, Tao X (2019) Paving the Way to Tospovirus Infection: Multilined Interplays with PlantInnate Immunity. Annu Rev Phytopathol 57:41–62. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-100309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Virus-induced silencing of NRCX impairs growth in N. benthamiana. A Phenotypes of 6-week-old NbD037153.1-silenced and NRCX-silenced N. benthamiana plants. TRV constructs were agroinfiltrated at the two-leaf stage, with TRV-GUS as a control. Bar = 2 cm. B Silencing efficiency of NbD037153.1 and NRCX quantified by RT-qPCR (means ± SD; n = 3 technology replicates). C Phylogenetic tree of NRCX homologs in N. benthamiana. Bootstrap values (> 70%) from 1,000 replicates are shown at branch nodes. D Flanking sequence of the potential CRISPR target. The nrcx mutant contains a 7-bp deletion in the NRCX coding sequence, with no off-target mutations detected at predicted sites.
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Summary of predicted NLRs. The phylogeny of the 29 species is based on data from the Taxonomy Database and previous studies (Ngou et al. 2022). The numbers of NLRs, paired NLRs and NRC helper NLRs in each species are shown in boxplots alongside the species names. NLRs were identified from plant proteomes using NLRtracker (Kourelis et al. 2021). NLRtracker hits were annotated as NB-ARC domain-containing proteins that were considered NLRs. Paired NLRs were defined as NLRs in a “head-to-head” arrangement, separated by no more than two non-NLR genes. NRC helper NLRs were identified through phylogenetic analysis (Wu et al. 2017). NLRs that clustered with functionally validated NRC helpers (NRC2, NRC3, and NRC4) were classified as NRC helper NLRs.
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Silencing of paired NLRs in N. benthamiana. A Genomic organization of six paired NLRs in N. benthamiana. B Phenotypes of N. benthamiana plants following VIGS of six NLR partners. TRV constructs were agroinfiltrated into two-week-old plants, and phenotypes were recorded 4 weeks post-infiltration. TRV:GUS (β-glucuronidase) served as a control. Bar = 2 cm. C Silencing efficiency of NRCX quantified by RT-qPCR. TRV:GUS-infiltrated plants were used as controls.
Additional file 4: Figure S4. Co-silencing NARY partially rescues the dwarf phenotype of NRCX-silenced plants. A Genomic loci of NRCX and NARY, separated by 18,795 bp. Exons (green, yellow, pink for CC, NB-ARC, and LRR domains, respectively) and introns are annotated. Translation start sites are marked with inverted triangles. B TRV vector designs for NRCX (deep red) and NARY (deep blue) silencing. Target regions (~ 300 bp) are highlighted. C Silencing efficiency of NRCX and NARY (mean ± SD; n = 3; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t-test). D Phenotypes of N. benthamiana plants silenced for NRCX (TRV-X), NARY (TRV-Y), or both (TRV-X/Y). TRV-GUS was the control. Bars = 2 cm. E Leaf diameter measurements (mean ± SD; n = 16; lowercase letters indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA, **, P < 0.01). F PR1 expression in indicated leaves (mean ± SD; n = 3; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Additional file 5: Figure S5. Mutation sites in nrcx/nary (xy) and nary (y) knockout lines. A,B Genomic structures of nary (blue) and nrcx (gray) in N. benthamiana. gRNA target sites (bright yellow) and sequencing-confirmed mutations (red) are shown for wild-type, xy (double knockout), and y (nary single knockout) lines.
Additional file 6: Figure S6. Phenotypes of plants with simultaneous silencing of NRC2/3, NARY and NRCX. A Growth phenotypes of wild-type N. benthamiana subjected to VIGS targeting NRC2/NRC3 (TRV-2/3), NRC2/NRC3/NRCX (TRV-2/3/X), or NRC2/NRC3/NRCX/NARY (TRV-2/3/X/Y). Plants were agroinfiltrated with TRV constructs at the two-leaf stage (2-week-old) and imaged 9 weeks post-treatment. Bars = 1 cm. B Phenotypes of detached leaves from silenced plants. Leaves (third to fourth true leaves from the apex) were excised and arranged for comparison. Bar = 1 cm. C Quantification of leaf diameter. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 18); lowercase letters denote significant differences between groups (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). D RT-qPCR analysis of target gene silencing efficiency. Expression levels of NRC2, NRC3, NRCX, and NARY were normalized to the internal control EF1a. TRV-GUS-infiltrated plants served as negative controls. E Phenotypes of NRCX/NARY-silenced wild-type and nrc2/3/4 triple knockout mutants. Plants were treated and imaged as in (A). Bars = 1 cm.
Additional file 7: Figure S7. Phylogenetic analysis of NARY homologs. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree (RAxML v8.2.12, JTT model) of NB-ARC domains from 2189 NLRs across Solanum lycopersicum (Solyc-), Nicotiana benthamiana (NbD-), coffee (Coffea canephora, Cc-), kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa, DTZ-), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, EL-), Arabidopsis thaliana (AT-), and rice (Oryza sativa, Os-). The NARY-clade (blue) and NRCX-clade (orange) are highlighted. Domain architectures and conserved motifs (identified by MEME) of the NARY-clade are expanded at bottom right.
Additional file 8: Table S1. List of primers in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data and materials are available in the paper and online supplemental files.






