Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Oct;109(Suppl 5):797–801. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s5797

Environmental public health surveillance: possible estuary-associated syndrome.

L C Backer 1, A S Niskar 1, C Rubin 1, K Blindauer 1, D Christianson 1, L Naeher 1, H S Rogers 1
PMCID: PMC1240614  PMID: 11677192

Abstract

Public health surveillance involves the collection, analysis, and dissemination of data for use in public health practice. A surveillance system includes the capacity to collect and analyze data as well as the ability to disseminate the data to public health agencies that can undertake effective prevention and control activities. An emerging issue in environmental public health surveillance involves human exposure to the toxins produced by microorganisms present in oceans and estuaries. One of these organisms is Pfiesteria piscicida Steidinger & Burkholder, a dinoflagellate found in estuaries along the Atlantic and gulf coasts of the United States. There have been reports of both human illness associated with occupational exposures to concentrated laboratory cultures of P. piscicida and massive fill kills associated with the presence of the organism in rivers and estuaries. These reports, and anecdotal reports from people who worked on rivers where the organism has been found, generated concern that environmental exposures to P. piscicida, similar organisms, or perhaps a toxin or toxins produced by the organism(s), could cause adverse human health effects. To begin to evaluate the public health burden associated with P. piscicida, investigators from the National Center for Environmental Health at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and health agencies from states along the Atlantic coast collaborated to develop a passive surveillance system for collecting, classifying, and tracking public inquiries about the organism. Specifically, the group developed exposure and symptom criteria and developed data collection and reporting capabilities to capture the human health parameters collectively referred to as possible estuary-associated syndrome (PEAS). The surveillance system was implemented in six states (Delaware, Florida, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia) beginning in June 1998. From 1 June 1998 through 30 June 2001, the six state health agencies participating in the PEAS surveillance system received 3,859 calls: 3,768 callers requested information and 91 callers reported symptoms. Five individuals have been identified as meeting PEAS criteria.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (520.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burkholder J. M., Noga E. J., Hobbs C. H., Glasgow H. B., Jr, Smith S. A. New 'phantom' dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills. Nature. 1992 Jul 30;358(6385):407–410. doi: 10.1038/358407a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fairey E. R., Edmunds J. S., Deamer-Melia N. J., Glasgow H., Jr, Johnson F. M., Moeller P. R., Burkholder J. M., Ramsdell J. S. Reporter gene assay for fish-killing activity produced by Pfiesteria piscicida. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Sep;107(9):711–714. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glasgow H. B., Jr, Burkholder J. M., Schmechel D. E., Tester P. A., Rublee P. A. Insidious effects of a toxic estuarine dinoflagellate on fish survival and human health. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1995 Dec;46(4):501–522. doi: 10.1080/15287399509532051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grattan L. M., Oldach D., Perl T. M., Lowitt M. H., Matuszak D. L., Dickson C., Parrott C., Shoemaker R. C., Kauffman C. L., Wasserman M. P. Learning and memory difficulties after environmental exposure to waterways containing toxin-producing Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates. Lancet. 1998 Aug 15;352(9127):532–539. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02132-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kane A. S., Dykstra M. J., Noga E. J., Reimschuessel R., Baya A., Driscoll C., Paerl H. W., Landsberg J. Etiologies, observations and reporting of estuarine finfish lesions. Mar Environ Res. 2000 Jul-Dec;50(1-5):473–477. doi: 10.1016/s0141-1136(00)00117-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kane A. S., Oldach D., Reimschuessel R. Fish lesions in the Chesapeake Bay: Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates and other etiologies. Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):106–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Oldach D. W., Delwiche C. F., Jakobsen K. S., Tengs T., Brown E. G., Kempton J. W., Schaefer E. F., Bowers H. A., Glasgow H. B., Jr, Burkholder J. M. Heteroduplex mobility assay-guided sequence discovery: elucidation of the small subunit (18S) rDNA sequences of Pfiesteria piscicida and related dinoflagellates from complex algal culture and environmental sample DNA pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4303–4308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thacker S. B., Berkelman R. L. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164–190. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thacker S. B., Stroup D. F., Parrish R. G., Anderson H. A. Surveillance in environmental public health: issues, systems, and sources. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):633–638. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES