The cleavage of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor indinavir sulfate via a one-pot synthesis reflux method with 1-propanol successfully yielded the salt bis(2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-aminium) sulfate. The reported analysis provides comprehensive insights into the chemical transformations, thermal stability and molecular interactions of the salt, contributing to its characterization and potential pharmaceutical applications.
Keywords: crystal structure, indinavir, solvation crystallization, salt crystal structure, slow evaporation, thermal analysis, surface analysis, chemical transformations
Abstract
The HIV-1 protease inhibitor indinavir sulfate was cleaved via a one-pot reflux synthesis using 1-propanol, yielding the salt bis(2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-aminium) sulfate, 2C9H12NO+·SO42−. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) revealed that the salt crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21. The structure consists of two conformationally distinct cations and one sulfate anion, stabilized through an extensive hydrogen-bonding network. Thermal analysis showed minor solvent loss around 200 °C, followed by a two-step decomposition process commencing at 306.6 °C. Hirshfeld surface analysis revealed dominant O⋯H/H⋯O (44.4–41.0%) and H⋯H (45.2–40.1%) intermolecular contacts, with minor contributions from C⋯H/H⋯C and C⋯O/O⋯C interactions. These contact percentages were calculated for each of the two independent cations. The van der Waals surface area (687.30 Å2) accounts for 71.43% of the unit cell. These results provide structural and thermal evidence for the transformation of indinavir sulfate under alcoholytic conditions, highlighting the formation and stabilization of the resulting salt.
Introduction
Amino alcohols are primarily derived from a diverse range of chiral compounds, offering significant advantages due to their conformational properties and structural diversity in drug design (Matamoros et al., 2023 ▸). One notable compound in this category is cis-1-amino-2-indanol, a versatile building block in pharmaceutical formulations. Its applications extend to the synthesis of antimalarial drugs and HIV-1 protease inhibitors, where it plays a critical role. This compound is frequently used as a rigid scaffold for covalently attached chiral auxiliary molecules, acts as a resolving agent for secondary alcohols and can function as a racemic carboxylic acid. Furthermore, it is instrumental in the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of various molecules (Gallou & Senanayake, 2006 ▸). Among amino alcohols, cis-1-amino-2-indanol is of considerable pharmaceutical significance (Gallou & Senanayake, 2006 ▸). It was first introduced as a chiral amino alcohol P2′ ligand in the development of HIV protease inhibitors, culminating in Merck’s discovery of the potent inhibitor L-685,434, commonly known as indinavir (Dorsey et al., 1994 ▸). This chiral compound has been recognised as a pivotal ligand in the development of HIV-PR inhibitors, with various strategies employed to synthesize different asymmetric constrained phenyl glycinol surrogates. Its sterically bulky indane structure, combined with the restricted cis-aminoindanol moiety, constrains the formation of an effective chiral discriminative environment, limiting enantioselective or diastereoselective outcomes during reactions (Gallou & Senanayake, 2006 ▸).
Drug hydrolysis plays a crucial role in pharmaceutical research, as it directly affects the stability, efficacy and safety of drug formulations (Mehta & Bhayani, 2017 ▸). This chemical process, which involves breaking down drug molecules through a reaction with water, is a common pathway for drug degradation (Lieberman & Vemuri, 2015 ▸). In addition to water, solvents such as alcohols and other organic solvents can also influence drug hydrolysis (Mehta & Bhayani, 2017 ▸). These solvents may act as reactants or catalysts (Dutta et al., 2024 ▸) in hydrolytic reactions, depending on the chemical nature of the drug and the solvent environment. Hydrolysis can affect various functional groups in drug molecules, such as esters, amides and lactones, leading to therapeutic effectiveness and potential toxicity changes (Zhou et al., 2017 ▸). In certain instances, alcohols can engage in transesterification reactions, where an ester group in the drug molecule interacts with the alcohol to create a new ester (Lieberman & Vemuri, 2015 ▸). This reaction is particularly relevant in formulations that include ethanol or other alcohols as solvents. Solvents like acetone, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or acetonitrile can alter the reaction kinetics of hydrolysis. They may stabilize or destabilize intermediates, thereby impacting the rate of hydrolysis (Schmidt & Scholze, 1985 ▸; Issa & Luyt, 2019 ▸). The presence of both water and organic solvents can create unique environments that affect hydrolysis.
In recent years, advances in various analytical techniques, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), have enhanced our ability to study hydrolytic degradation and predict its impact on drug stability (Battu & Pottabathini, 2015 ▸). Researchers are also exploring innovative formulation strategies, including the use of excipients and encapsulation methods, to mitigate hydrolysis and extend the shelf life of pharmaceutical products. Understanding the mechanisms and factors influencing hydrolysis remains a critical area of focus, as it informs the development of more stable and effective drug formulations.
Experimental
Synthesis and crystallization
The one-pot synthesis reflux method (Smith et al., 2015 ▸) was used for the synthesis of bis(2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-aminium) sulfate, (I) (Scheme 1). In a dram vial, 0.020 g of indinavir sulfate (0.0324 mmol) was dissolved in 1-propanol solvent and heated at 363 K while stirring at 300 rpm for 4 h. With the lid of the dram vial loosely open, the solution was allowed to evaporate slowly at temperatures ranging from 283 to 273 K. After three weeks, colourless plates had formed.
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1 ▸. H atoms on O and N atoms were allowed to refine freely.
Table 1. Experimental details.
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | 2C9H12NO+·SO42− |
M r | 396.47 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21 |
Temperature (K) | 123 |
a, b, c (Å) | 11.6412 (10), 6.4226 (4), 12.8761 (10) |
β (°) | 103.791 (4) |
V (Å3) | 934.95 (12) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
μ (mm−1) | 0.21 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.57 × 0.11 × 0.03 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I ≥ 2σ(I)] reflections | 26758, 3458, 2956 |
R int | 0.098 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.606 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.045, 0.111, 1.04 |
No. of reflections | 3454 |
No. of parameters | 276 |
No. of restraints | 1 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.28, −0.42 |
Absolute structure | Hooft et al. (2010 ▸) |
Absolute structure parameter | −0.04 (6) |
Surface analyses
Hirshfeld surface analysis was performed to quantify the various intermolecular interactions contributing to the crystal structure of salt (I) using CrystalExplorer (Version 17.5; Spackman et al., 2021 ▸). A surface was mapped over dnorm, along with two-dimensional (2D) fingerprint plots, which were utilized to analyse these interactions (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸; Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸). The Hirshfeld surface of salt (I) is colour-coded and mapped over dnorm. The surface area, density and volumetric analyses were conducted using the two-probe mode configuration, employing a small radius probe (rsmall_p) of 1.2 Å and a large radius probe (rlarge_p) of 3.0 Å. Optimization was performed to a depth of 4, with a grid resolution of 0.2 Å for enhanced accuracy using MoloVol (Version 1.1.1; Maglic & Lavendomme, 2022 ▸).
Fourier transform IR (FT–IR) spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy
FT–IR analysis was performed at 288 K using a Shimadzu QATR10 ATR accessory with a germanium crystal. Measurements were taken in percentage transmittance mode with 64 scans, a resolution of 4 cm−1 and a range of 700–4.000 cm−1. Data were processed with LabSolutions IR (Version 2.26). Raman spectroscopy utilized a Bruker MultiRam Fourier transform spectrometer with a Nd-YAG laser and a germanium diode detector, also with 64 scans at 450 mW power.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
Thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry data were collected using a thermogravimetric analyser from an Advanced Laboratory Solutions (TGA/DSC) SQ600 between 323 and 1073 K, at a heating rate of 283 K min−1 and a nitrogen gas flow rate of 20 ml min−1.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
For the NMR analysis, crystals of salt (I) were dissolved in deuterated DMSO-d6 containing 1% tetramethylsilane and transferred to an NMR tube for analysis. The samples were analysed using an Agilent 500 MHz spectrometer at room temperature (299 K) and the NMR spectra were captured (1H at 500 MHz and 13C at 125 MHz).
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 8.50 (s, 1H, –NH3), 8.15 (s, 1H, –NH3), 7.71 (s, 1H, –NH3), 7.48–7.23 (m, 4H, –CH aromatic of the indenol moiety), 5.85 (s, 1H, OH), 4.57 [d, 1H, –CH(OH)], 3.02–2.98 (m, 1H, –CH2), 2.95–2.91 (m, 1H, –CH2). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 141.40 (1C), 138.62 (1C), 129.13 (1C), 128.85 (2C), 126.77 (1C), 70.17 (1C), 62.44 (1C), 35.53 (1C). HRMS–ESI (acetonitrile, m/z) calculated for [C9H12NO]+ 150.09; found: [M + 2]+ 152.2306.
Results and discussion
Indinavir sulfate was reacted with 1-propanol, which resulted in the alcoholysis of the salt into two distinct parts. Under certain stress conditions, such as changes in pH, temperature and oxidation, indinavir sulfate is known to hydrolyse and ultimately degrade (Rao et al., 2013 ▸), as observed in the cleavage of the molecule. However, since 1-propanol is an alcohol, the degradation of indinavir sulfate in this case is referred to as alcoholysis. A reaction where an alcohol molecule acts as a reactant, breaking chemical bonds, typically in esters or similar compounds, by replacing certain functional groups with an alcohol group (Avhad & Marchetti, 2015 ▸). The compound cleaved into (3S,5S)-3-benzyl-5-[(2-{[(tert-butylamino)oxy]methyl}-4-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl]dihydrofuran-2(3H)-one, which remained in solution, and the salt bis(2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-aminium) sulfate, (I) (Scheme 1), which was crystallized.
Salt (I) crystallized in the monoclinic space group P21 with Z = 2. The proposed chemical formula for the asymmetric unit is 2C9H12NO+·SO42−. The cations are, however, slightly different from one another due to the absence of a centre of inversion, indicating that the cations themselves are not symmetrical. The cations exhibit minor conformational diversity. The hydroxy H atoms point in opposite directions, at an angle of 138° from one another (Fig. 1 ▸).
Figure 1.
Molecular overlay of the 2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-aminium cations, highlighting their minor conformational diversity.
The asymmetric unit of salt (I) is illustrated in Fig. 2 ▸. The figure illustrates that the salt is stabilized by hydrogen bonds, with donor–acceptor distances ranging from 2.6 to 2.9 Å. Both amine functional groups of the cations interact with the S=O bonds: N1⋯O5 exhibits a hydrogen-bond length of 2.807 (4) Å, while N2⋯O6 displays a length of 2.833 (3) Å.
Figure 2.
The asymmetric unit of salt (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Additionally, the alcohol functional groups form hydrogen bonds with the S=O moieties. Specifically, O1⋯O3 features a hydrogen-bond length of 2.724 (3) Å and O2⋯O4 forms a hydrogen bond of 2.675 (3) Å. The bond angles observed in these interactions are linked to the sulfate anion. The out-of-plane bond angle for C9—C1—O1 is 112.5 (3)°, while the second cation exhibits a corresponding bond angle for C11—C10—O2 of 113.3 (3)°. Positioned between the two cations, the sulfate anion adopts a tetrahedral structure with an average O—S—O bond angle of 109.42°. This configuration is characteristic of tetrahedral molecules and reflects the optimized molecular geometry within the crystal lattice. The bond angles for the sulfate anion are detailed in Table 2 ▸.
Table 2. Selected bond angles (°).
O4—S1—O3 | 110.40 (14) | O6—S1—O3 | 110.36 (13) |
O5—S1—O3 | 110.40 (13) | O6—S1—O4 | 108.23 (13) |
O5—S1—O4 | 108.36 (14) | O6—S1—O5 | 109.02 (13) |
Hirshfeld surface analysis was conducted to characterize the intermolecular interactions between each independent cation and the sulfate ion within the asymmetric unit. The molecular assembly is inherently asymmetric, highlighting the noncentrosymmetric nature of the structure. The two-dimensional (2D) fingerprint plots were generated based solely on the asymmetric unit rather than the full packing arrangement within the unit cell (Z = 2), ensuring an accurate depiction of the local interaction motifs rather than global lattice effects (Fig. 3 ▸). The red areas between the aminium and sulfate ions, as well as between the hydroxy groups and sulfate ions, indicate short intermolecular bonds, such as strong hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions, due to the distance between bonds. The blue spots indicate regions in the crystal where the contacts between the atoms are larger than the sum of the van der Waals radii. These contacts are typically weak interactions that contribute to less significant intermolecular bonding.
Figure 3.
Two views of the independent cation surfaces of the salt (I) mapped over dnorm, indicating the various intermolecular bonds in white, red and blue.
In the first independent cation (Fig. 3 ▸, left), the dominance of O⋯H/H⋯O interactions at 41.0% aligns with their significant role in hydrogen bonding, which often drives molecular stability. The closely following H⋯H interactions (40.1%) highlight the contribution of van der Waals forces in stabilizing the system. C⋯H/H⋯C contacts (18.1%) suggest secondary interactions, possibly contributing to the overall packing and orientation of the components. Finally, the minimal C⋯O/O⋯C interactions at 0.8% imply that these interactions play a very limited role in the stability of the system (Fig. 4 ▸).
Figure 4.
2D fingerprint plots of cation A of salt (I), detailing the intramolecular interactions.
In the second independent cation (Fig. 3 ▸, right), the interactions within the crystal structure indicate an increase in H⋯H contacts to 45.2%, underscoring their dominant role, likely reflecting stronger van der Waals interactions or a more densely packed molecular environment. The similar percentages of the O⋯H/H⋯O interactions at 44.4% highlights the significance of hydrogen bonding, potentially linked to stability or reactivity differences compared to the first part of the structure. The lower proportion of C⋯H/H⋯C interactions at 10.3% suggests interaction variations due to the change in molecular orientation. These changes offer insights into differing behaviour pathways across structural regions. C⋯O interactions remain minor, making up just 0.8% here as well (Fig. 5 ▸).
Figure 5.
2D fingerprint plots of cation B of salt (I), detailing the intramolecular interactions.
This consistency across both parts of the crystal structure suggests that C⋯O contacts have a limited role in stabilizing the molecular framework. However, even such low percentages can occasionally hint at subtle but specific interactions, such as dipole–dipole alignments or lone-pair contributions.
Further crystallographic details revealed that the calculated density of the crystal is ρ = 1.408 Mg m−3. The total molecular volume of the unit cell was measured at 934.95 Å3, with van der Waals volumes accounting for 71.43% of the cell, while 28.57% corresponded to probe-excluded void volumes, according to the MoloVol volumetric analysis. The calculated van der Waals surface area of the molecule is 687.30 Å2 (Fig. 6 ▸) and is solely based on the van der Waals radii of the constituent atoms (Charry & Tkatchenko, 2024 ▸). The calculated van der Waals surface area of 687.30 Å2 reflects the size and shape of the molecular envelope over which intermolecular interactions occur. When considered alongside the Hirshfeld surface interaction percentages, this surface area indicates that there is sufficient contact area to support both dense molecular packing, as evidenced by the high proportion of H⋯H contacts, and extensive hydrogen bonding, as seen in the O⋯H/H⋯O contributions. This analysis highlights the spatial distribution of close contacts and underscores the dual role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding in stabilizing the crystal structure.
Figure 6.
The van der Waals surface area map of the asymmetric unit of salt (I).
The degradation product, (1S,2R)-(+)-cis-1-amino-2-indanol, formed by alcoholysis of the amide bond on indinavir, is enantiopure and lacks inversion symmetry. This intrinsic chirality drives the selection of space group P21, as centrosymmetric packing would require both enantiomers, which are absent in this case. Furthermore, the sulfate ion plays a crucial role in stabilizing the asymmetric molecular arrangement. The anion engages in specific hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions, which reinforce the observed packing mode.
The FT–IR and Raman spectra of salt (I) are depicted in Fig. 7 ▸, and the major peaks are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The strong peak at 2995–2849 cm−1 depicts a primary amine peak at 3180–3200 cm−1. A 3003–2868 cm−1 peak was recorded, which is observed as a symmetric vibration with another –NH3+ group at 1650–1580 cm−1. The very strong and broad peak at 3100–2400 cm−1 indicates the presence of –OH groups. In the range 1060–1045 cm−1, there is an S=O stretch, depicted as a very strong peak in the fingerprint region. There is an additional peak that was observed at 1765 cm−1, which corresponds with an S=O stretching vibration. The high polarity of S=O leads to a significant change in the dipole moment during the stretching vibration that would appear in the FT–IR spectra. The same distinctive peak may appear smaller on the Raman spectra due to the polarization change during the vibration. The peak which appears on the FT–IR spectrum at 1700–1800 cm−1 is due to the asymmetric stretch, which was observed on S=O, whereas the vibration observed at 1045–1060 cm−1 is due to S=O being observed as a symmetric stretching vibration.
Figure 7.
Figure 7: Superimposed FT–IR and Raman spectra of salt (I), with arrows indicating major peaks observed in the Raman spectrum.
Table 3. FT–IR spectral data analysis of (I).
Group | Wavenumber observed (cm−1) | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Intensity | Assignment |
---|---|---|---|---|
–NH2 | 2995–2849 | 3200–3180 | Strong | NH2 primary amine |
–OH | 3003–2868 | 3100–2400 | Very strong | OH stretch, very broad band |
–NH2 | 1650 | 1650–1580 | Mid-strength | NH2 deformation |
S=O | 1038 | 1060–1045 | Very strong | S=O stretch |
Raman spectroscopy of compound (I) revealed characteristic vibrational modes consistent with its functional groups as summarized in Table 4 ▸. A strong band at 3065 cm−1 corresponds to N—H stretching of the protonated amine (–NH3+) groups, while very strong peaks at 2935 and 2905 cm−1 arise from aliphatic C—H stretching. Aromatic ring C=C stretching modes appear at 1615 and 1590 cm−1. A medium-intensity band at 1460 cm−1 is attributed to C—H bending vibrations. Strong bands in the 1025–990 cm−1 region correspond to symmetric and asymmetric S=O stretching of the sulfate anion, and medium-intensity peaks at 790–730 cm−1 are assigned to SO42− bending deformations, consistent with typical tetrahedral sulfate vibrational behaviour.
Table 4. Raman spectral data analysis of (I).
Group | Wavenumber observed (cm−1) | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Intensity | Assignment |
---|---|---|---|---|
–NH3+ | 3065 | 3200 – 3100 | Strong | N—H stretch |
C—H | 2935/2905 | 3000–2800 | Very strong | Aliphatic C—H stretching |
C=C | 1615/1590 | 1650–1580 | Strong | C=C aromatic ring stretch |
C—H | 1460 | 1500–1300 | Mid-strength | C—H deformation |
S=O | 1025–990 | 1100–980 | Strong | S=O symmetric/asymmetric stretching |
SO42− | 790–730 | 750–600 | Mid-strength | SO42− bending deformation |
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to investigate the thermal behaviour of salt (I). The TGA data show a gradual decrease in weight from about 200 °C, indicating the onset of thermal decomposition. Although no distinct inflexion is observed below 200 °C, a slight drift in the baseline of the derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curve may suggest minor desorption of surface-bound solvent or water in that region. This is supported by the DSC trace, which displays a shallow endothermic event in the same range, consistent with solvent loss rather than melting.
Notably, a well-defined melting endotherm is absent, confirming that salt (I) does not exhibit a simple melting transition under these conditions. With further heating, an exothermic transition is observed at approximately 306.6 °C (579.75 K), which likely marks the beginning of decomposition (possibly involving the loss of the C18H24N2O2 fragments). The thermal event observed near 325–350 °C indicates the total decomposition of the sulfate SO42− anion (Brown, 1988 ▸). Fig. 8 ▸ illustrates these thermal events, where the initial weight loss and corresponding endothermic DSC feature collectively emphasize the removal of residual solvent/moisture, with later peaks arising from compound degradation rather than phase transitions.
Figure 8.
(a) TGA–DTG data and (b) TGA–DSC data, indicating a mass loss due to the decomposition of the sulfate anion and the 2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-aminium cation.
The 1H NMR exhibits multiplet signals at δ 2.91 to 2.95 ppm and δ 3.00 to 3.03 ppm due to the aliphatic protons of CH2. The OH group produced a single broad peak at δ 5.83 ppm. A doublet was observed because of one CH(OH) proton. The four protons on the indenol aromatic ring were responsible for the multiplet that was observed. At δ 8.50, 8.13 and 7.71, three single peaks were observed due to the NH3 protons.
In the 13C NMR spectral analysis, the aliphatic region shows the signal due to CH2 at δ 35.53 ppm, while the second aliphatic carbon signal due to C—NH3 appears at δ 62.44 ppm. The third aliphatic carbon signal is due to CH(OH) at δ 70.17 ppm. A signal due to one carbon at δ 126.77 ppm was observed. Another signal due to the two aromatic carbons of the indenol moiety was observed at δ 128.85 ppm. At δ 129.13 ppm, a signal due to one carbon (–CH) on the aromatic region was observed. A signal due to –C(CH)= was observed at δ 138.62 ppm. A signal due to the carbon in the aromatic ring was observed at δ 141.40 ppm.
Supplementary Material
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077sup3.mol
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077Isup4.cml
CCDC reference: 2324379
Funding Statement
Funding for this research was provided by: National Research Foundation (grant No. CSUR23042597072 to Mark G. Smith).
References
- Avhad, M. R. & Marchetti, J. M. (2015). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.50, 696–718.
- Battu, S. & Pottabathini, V. (2015). Am. J. Anal. Chem.6, 145–155.
- Bourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 59–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Brown, M. E. (1988). Introduction to thermal analysis: techniques and applications, p. 20. London, New York: Chapman and Hall.
- Bruker (2016). APEX3, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Charry, J. & Tkatchenko, A. (2024). J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 7469–7478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst.42, 339–341.
- Dorsey, B. D., Levin, R. B., McDaniel, S. L., Vacca, J. P., Guare, J. P., Darke, P. L., Zugay, J. A., Emini, E. A., Schleif, W. A., Quintero, J. C., Lin, J. H., Chen, I.-W., Holloway, M. K., Fitzgerald, P. M. D., Axwl, M. G., Ostovic, D., Anderson, P. S. & Huff, J. R. (1994). J. Med. Chem.37, 3443–3451. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Dutta, S., Zhang, Q., Yu, I. K. M. & Tsang, D. C. W. (2024). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.12, 9222–9230.
- Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst.45, 849–854.
- Gallou, I. & Senanayake, C. (2006). Chem. Rev.106, 2843–2874. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Hooft, R. W. W., Straver, L. H. & Spek, A. L. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst.43, 665–668.
- Issa, A. A. & Luyt, A. S. (2019). Polymers11, 537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Lieberman, H. & Vemuri, N. M. (2015). The practice of medicinal chemistry, pp. 767–791. New York: Academic Press.
- Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst.53, 226–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Maglic, J. B. & Lavendomme, R. (2022). J. Appl. Cryst.55, 1033–1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Matamoros, E., Light, M. E., Cintas, P. & Palacios, J. C. (2023). Molecules28, 1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814–3816. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Mehta, P. & Bhayani, D. (2017). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.136, 111–119. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Rao, R. N., Raju, S. S. & Vali, R. M. (2013). J. Chromatogr. B931, 174–180. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, H. & Scholze, H. (1985). Mechanisms and kinetics of the hydrolysis and condensation of alkoxides, in Glass…current issues, edited by A. F. Wright & J. Dupuy. NATO ASI Series, Vol 92. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
- Smith, M. G., Forbes, R. P. & Lemmerer, A. (2015). Cryst. Growth Des.15, 3813–3821.
- Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm11, 19–32.
- Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst.54, 1006–1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Spek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Zhou, D., Porter, W. R. & Zhang, G. G. Z. (2017). Drug stability and degradation studies, in Developing solid oral dosage forms, 2nd ed., edited by Y. Qiu, Y. Chen, G. G. Z. Zhang, L. Yu & R. V. Mantri, ch. 5, pp. 113–149. New York: Academic Press.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077sup3.mol
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2053229625005807/dg3077Isup4.cml
CCDC reference: 2324379