Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Feb;109(2):161–165. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109161

Environmental sensitivities: prevalence of major symptoms in a referral center: the Nova Scotia Environmental Sensitivities Research Center Study.

M R Joffres 1, T Williams 1, B Sabo 1, R A Fox 1
PMCID: PMC1240637  PMID: 11266327

Abstract

Although the phenomenon of environmental sensitivities (ES) has no clear etiology nor well-accepted pathophysiology, affected individuals experience symptoms that cause varying levels of dysfunction. Through a dedicated, government-funded research and treatment center, a detailed questionnaire covering 217 symptoms in 13 systems was mailed in 1997-1998 to 812 individuals referred to the center by physicians. A total of 385 (47%) questionnaires were returned, and data were analyzed on 351 individuals. Participants tended to be women (80%), middle-aged individuals (37% age 40-49 years), and those in higher educational groups (28% completed university), but there was wide variation in demographic variables. General symptoms such as difficulty concentrating, fatigue, forgetfulness, and irritability dominated the overall prevalence of symptoms since the start of their illness. Those related to irritation such as sneezing, itchy or burning eyes, and hoarseness or loss of voice were more common after exposure to environmental irritants. Ranking of symptoms using severity scores was consistent between men and women. Overall scores were higher in women, in participants who were separated or divorced, and in low-income groups. The type and consistency of symptoms experienced after exposure to triggering substances may not fit a purely psychogenic theory.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (62.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Antelman S. M. Time-dependent sensitization in animals: a possible model of multiple chemical sensitivity in humans. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):335–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bascom R. Multiple chemical sensitivity: a respiratory disorder? Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):221–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell I. R., Szarek M. J., Dicenso D. R., Baldwin C. M., Schwartz G. E., Bootzin R. R. Patterns of waking EEG spectral power in chemically intolerant individuals during repeated chemical exposures. Int J Neurosci. 1999 Mar;97(1-2):41–59. doi: 10.3109/00207459908994302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell I. R. White paper: Neuropsychiatric aspects of sensitivity to low-level chemicals: a neural sensitization model. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):277–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cullen M. R. The worker with multiple chemical sensitivities: an overview. Occup Med. 1987 Oct-Dec;2(4):655–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidoff A. L., Fogarty L., Keyl P. M. Psychiatric inferences from data on psychologic/psychiatric symptoms in multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome. Arch Environ Health. 2000 May-Jun;55(3):165–175. doi: 10.1080/00039890009603402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davidoff A. L., Fogarty L. Psychogenic origins of multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome: a critical review of the research literature. Arch Environ Health. 1994 Sep-Oct;49(5):316–325. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1994.9954981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doty R. L. Olfaction and multiple chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):359–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fox R. A., Sabo B. M., Williams T. P., Joffres M. R. Intradermal testing for food and chemical sensitivities: a double-blind controlled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 May;103(5 Pt 1):907–911. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70437-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedman A., Kaufer D., Shemer J., Hendler I., Soreq H., Tur-Kaspa I. Pyridostigmine brain penetration under stress enhances neuronal excitability and induces early immediate transcriptional response. Nat Med. 1996 Dec;2(12):1382–1385. doi: 10.1038/nm1296-1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilbert M. E. The phenomenology of limbic kindling. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):343–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu H., Stern A., Rotnitzky A., Schlesinger L., Proctor S., Wolfe J. Development of a brief questionnaire for screening for multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Oct;15(6):582–588. doi: 10.1177/074823379901500606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kipen H. M., Fiedler N. Invited commentary: sensitivities to chemicals--context and implications. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jul 1;150(1):13–17. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kipen H. M., Hallman W., Kang H., Fiedler N., Natelson B. H. Prevalence of chronic fatigue and chemical sensitivities in Gulf Registry Veterans. Arch Environ Health. 1999 Sep-Oct;54(5):313–318. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kreutzer R., Neutra R. R., Lashuay N. Prevalence of people reporting sensitivities to chemicals in a population-based survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jul 1;150(1):1–12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacLean D. R., Petrasovits A., Nargundkar M., Connelly P. W., MacLeod E., Edwards A., Hessel P. Canadian heart health surveys: a profile of cardiovascular risk. Survey methods and data analysis. Canadian Heart Health Surveys Research Group. CMAJ. 1992 Jun 1;146(11):1969–1974. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKeown-Eyssen G. E., Sokoloff E. R., Jazmaji V., Marshall L. M., Baines C. J. Reproducibility of the University of Toronto self-administered questionnaire used to assess environmental sensitivity. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun 15;151(12):1216–1222. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meggs W. J., Dunn K. A., Bloch R. M., Goodman P. E., Davidoff A. L. Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Arch Environ Health. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):275–282. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1996.9936026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meggs W. J. Neurogenic inflammation and sensitivity to environmental chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Aug;101(3):234–238. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller C. S. Possible models for multiple chemical sensitivity: conceptual issues and role of the limbic system. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):181–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Overstreet D. H., Djuric V. Links between multiple chemical sensitivity and asthma in a rat model of cholinergic hypersensitivity: a brief review. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Aug;15(5):517–521. doi: 10.1177/074823379901500505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharabi Y., Danon Y. L., Berkenstadt H., Almog S., Mimouni-Bloch A., Zisman A., Dani S., Atsmon J. Survey of symptoms following intake of pyridostigmine during the Persian Gulf war. Isr J Med Sci. 1991 Nov-Dec;27(11-12):656–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sparks P. J., Daniell W., Black D. W., Kipen H. M., Altman L. C., Simon G. E., Terr A. I. Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. I. Case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs. J Occup Med. 1994 Jul;36(7):718–730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Staudenmayer H. Multiple chemical sensitivities or idiopathic environmental intolerances: psychophysiologic foundation of knowledge for a psychogenic explanation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Apr;99(4):434–437. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES