Abstract
Plasmids play a key role in the horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), particularly in aquaculture where ARG-carrying Vibrio bacteria are frequently detected. Given the expansion of global aquaculture and its reliance on antibiotics, we investigated how these practices influence the emergence, dynamics, and spread of ARGs, focusing on Magallana gigas hatcheries—the world’s most widely farmed shellfish. Among the three antibiotics tested, only chloramphenicol (CHL) led to a pronounced selection and dissemination of CHL-resistant Vibrio isolates. Resistance was mediated by catA2, located in a highly modular, insertion sequence- and transposase-rich region of a conjugative plasmid, alongside tet(B). This plasmid was closely related to emerging pAQU-type plasmids unreported in Europe. pAQU-MAN, derived from Marine ANtimicrobial resistance, is a low-copy, highly transferable plasmid that rapidly spread throughout the hatchery following CHL treatment. Though naturally found in commensal Vibrio, it exhibited a broad host range, transferring efficiently to both oyster- and human-pathogenic Vibrio strains, as well as to Escherichia coli, with high conjugation rates. Additionally, it remained stable in Vibrio hosts and was transmitted from oyster parents to progenies, even in the absence of antibiotic. It eventually disappeared from the microbial community associated to adults. Our findings highlight that antibiotic use in oyster hatcheries can select for highly modular and transferable multidrug-resistant plasmids, posing a risk of environmental dissemination, although their limited persistence in juvenile oyster reduces the likelihood of transmission to humans. We discuss the human and ecological factors driving pAQU-MAN spread and control in aquaculture settings.
Keywords: antibiotic resistance, Vibrio spp, oyster, hatchery, pAQU plasmid, conjugative transfer, AMR, MDR, shellfish farming
Introduction
Widespread antibiotic overuse has fueled the global rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is widely recognized as a major global threat to human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health [1]. AMR arises through genetic mutations and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) involving mobile genetic elements (MGEs) carrying antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), such as transposons, insertion sequences (ISs), and plasmids [2]. In particular, conjugative plasmids—transferring genetic material between donor and recipient cells by physical contact—can drive the spread of antibiotic resistance across diverse environments and bacterial taxa [3]. This is exemplified by the global dissemination of plasmid-encoded mcr-1 from livestock to humans, undermining the efficacy of colistin, a last-resort antibiotic, and heightening the risk of therapeutic failure [4, 5].
Different sectors of activity have been implicated as contributors to the global spread of antibiotic resistance, including aquaculture [6, 7]. With a rising global population and declining wild seafood stocks, aquaculture has become crucial for food security. Over the past 20 years, global aquaculture production has steadily increased, with 75% of it dominated by carps, tilapia, catfish, seaweeds, and bivalves [8]. Infectious diseases like vibriosis pose a major challenge in aquaculture, leading to heavy antibiotic use. Although some countries have reduced reliance through vaccination and improved practices, antibiotics remain essential for treatment and are often used preventively [9]. The oyster industry is of particular concern, as oysters are the most widely farmed mollusk globally and are often consumed raw, which heightens the risk of ingesting antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARBs), including Vibrio species pathogenic to humans [10, 11]. This raises significant concerns because Vibrio bacteria are currently considered a key global and emergent public health risk [11]. Different studies have raised concerns about antibiotic-resistant Vibrio pathogens in oysters [12–14]. For instance, in a commercial aquaculture facility in the USA, Crassostrea virginica were found to harbor potential Vibrio species pathogenic to humans, such as Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus. These isolates exhibited resistance to several antibiotics, including cephalosporins and tetracyclines (TETs), which are recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for treating Vibrio infections in humans [14]. Understanding the key drivers of AMR in aquaculture is therefore crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies under the “One Health” approach, which recognizes the interconnected health of humans, animals, and the environment [15]. A critical gap in knowledge remains in understanding how different veterinary antibiotics contribute to AMR in Vibrio bacteria—a challenge further complicated by significant variations in antibiotic regulations across countries.
Vibrio bacteria are known as reservoirs of plasmid-borne resistance [16]. Thus, V. splendidus was implicated in the transfer of quinolone resistance in marine environments [17]. Similarly, V. parahaemolyticus carrying NDM-1 carbapenemase resistance, capable of transfer to Escherichia coli, has been detected in imported shrimp from Vietnam to France, underscoring a potential global pathway for resistance dissemination [18]. Alarmingly, plasmid-borne resistance can propagate in shellfish hatcheries, as demonstrated in research facilities in Spain after the use of sublethal antibiotic concentrations, although the specific plasmid involved remains uncharacterized [19]. However, the human and environmental cues governing the spread and persistence of plasmid-associated AMR in Vibrio bacteria are still poorly understood. Such fundamental questions about plasmid epidemiological dynamics have been addressed in a number of non-Vibrio human pathogens [20], mostly in laboratory conditions. This has prompted recent reviews to call for studies on plasmid dynamics that better reflect real-world situations, a knowledge gap particularly critical in aquaculture, where the emergence of AMR in Vibrio bacteria not only undermines the treatment of vibriosis but also poses a serious public health risk [3, 21].
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of antibiotics on the development, dynamics, and spread of ARGs in Vibrio populations circulating in hatcheries of Magallana gigas oysters—the main mollusk species cultured worldwide—with a particular interest in plasmid-mediated AMR. This controlled but ecologically representative aquaculture system provided a relevant setting to investigate how antibiotic use influences microbial ecology, with direct implications for both oyster health and potential human exposure. In oyster hatcheries, bacterial diseases often cause mortalities during two critical phases: broodstock gametogenesis—when rising temperatures and increased feeding boost bacterial loads—and early larval development, when oysters are highly vulnerable to infection. To manage these mortalities, antibiotic use can be implemented to varying degrees depending on national regulations and the specific objectives of the hatchery, whether for commercial production or research. In this study, we tested three veterinary antibiotics classified by the World Health Organization as highly or critically important for human medicine [22], applying them under a worst-case prophylactic scenario to assess their potential impact on antimicrobial resistance. (i) chloramphenicol (CHL): although efforts have been made to ban this antibiotic for food production in many countries worldwide, it still seems to surface in some continents [6, 9, 23, 24]. CHL-resistant Vibrio pathogens contributed to larval culture failures of clam species in an experimental shellfish hatchery in Spain; resistance was plasmid-encoded [19]. (ii) Florfenicol (FLO): a monofluorinated derivative of CHL authorized for use in food-producing animals in most countries worldwide [9, 25]. FLO was shown to favor the emergence of FLO-resistant genes in channel catfish tanks, though its impact on Vibrio bacteria remains unexplored [26]. (iii) Flumequine (FLU): a fluoroquinolone widely used in aquaculture, which is mainly employed against Gram-negative bacteria [27]. It has been associated with the development of resistance in Aeromonas pathogens affecting rainbow trout in France [28].
Here, oysters with six distinct antibiotic treatment histories were produced in the experimental hatchery. The development of AMR in Vibrio isolates was monitored in seawater and oyster tissues under different antibiotic conditions. The oyster resistome and mobilome profiles were analyzed through pool sequencing of bacterial genomes. The dynamics of ARGs at different times of the hatchery process were assessed by quantifying their abundance in oyster tissues. Finally, to explore the spread of resistance genes and plasmids across bacterial species, associated ARGs were genetically characterized using whole genome sequencing of bacterial isolates. Our study shows that CHL usage has long-lasting transgenerational effects on the resistome of oysters. It induces the rapid spread of CHL resistance through the propagation of a highly transferable, broad-host-range conjugative plasmid, hosting an IS-rich platform for ARG exchange. This newly discovered plasmid belongs to the pAQU family repeatedly isolated in Vibrionaceae.
Materials and methods
Antibiotic treatment and sample collections
The juvenile production of Magallana gigas was conducted in a fully biosecure laboratory using ultraviolet (UV)-irradiated and filtered seawater, with treated effluents to ensure antibiotic removal. It was performed in two distinct phases, each involving specific antibiotic treatments: CHL was applied during gametogenesis, while FLU and FLO were administered post-reproduction (Fig. 1). During Phase 1 (47 days), adult oysters (collected from the natural environment, Fouras, France) underwent broodstock conditioning required for gametogenesis, culminating in reproduction. Oysters were allocated into four 400 l tanks. Two tanks received chloramphenicol (CHL; 8 mg·l−1) administered in three 48-h baths over 6 days—conditions known to effectively control bacteria in oyster tissues [29–31]. Two tanks served as controls (A−). At Day 0, gametes were separately harvested from each treatment and pooled for fertilization. During Phase 2 (105 days), embryos were reared to the spat stage. On Day 2 of larval development, progenies resulting from CHL-treated and control broodstock were divided into three groups: one received no antibiotics, another was treated with flumequine (FLU, 9.4 mg·l−1) administered in two repeated baths of 48 h for 4 days, and the third received florfenicol (FLO, 6.6 mg·l−1) under similar conditions. These antibiotic concentrations are those recommended in veterinary prescriptions for this project. Water samples (100 μl) were collected at critical time points during both phases and plated on thiosulfate–citrate–bile salts–sucrose (TCBS) agar, with or without antibiotics (CHL 10 mg.l−1, FLU 9.4 mg.l−1, or FLO 6.6 mg.l−1). Plates were then incubated at 20°C during 24 or 48 h, until Vibrio colonies appeared. Concurrently, samples from gametes, gonads, larvae (5000 individuals per sample), and spat (triplicate individuals) were homogenized and processed for both culture-based and molecular analyses. Oyster tissues for molecular analyses were stored at −80°C. At the end of each antibiotic treatment, to ensure antibiotic removal at the water outlet, filtration through an activated carbon filter was performed. Comprehensive details on antibiotic usage are provided in Supplementary Table S1; tank configuration, environmental conditions, and sample collection procedures are provided in Supplementary Material and Methods 1.1 and 1.2.
Figure 1.
Experimental design. The rearing of Magallana gigas consisted of two main periods: Period 1 focused on broodstock conditioning, essential for gametogenesis and culminating in reproduction, while Period 2 involved larval growth until the spat stage. At the start of Period 1, the broodstock was divided into two groups based on treatment conditions: one group received chloramphenicol (CHL), whereas the other was untreated (A−), with two tanks allocated for each condition. After reproduction, the larvae from both the CHL-treated and A-untreated broodstock were further divided into three groups: one treated with flumequine (FLU), one treated with florfenicol (FLO), and one left untreated (A−). This resulted in oysters with six distinct antibiotic histories: A−, CHL, A−/A−, A−/FLU, A−/FLO, CHL/A−, CHL/FLU, and CHL/FLO. Similarly, two replicate tanks were allocated for each condition. During Period 1, various samples, including seawater, gonads, and gametes, were collected on Day −27 (D-27), Day −13 (D-13), and the day of reproduction (D0). In Period 2, samples such as seawater, larvae, and spat were collected on Day 2 (D2) before antibiotic treatment, and on Day 7 (D + 7), Day 15 (D + 15), and Day 105 (D + 105) after antibiotic treatment.
Detection of ARGs by bacterial pool sequencing
For each condition, up to 24 colonies, grown on TCBS supplemented with CHL, were randomly selected and subcultured on Zobell agar to ensure purity. A total of 175 Vibrio isolates, from seawater and oyster tissue, were grouped into 12 pools according to sample types, antibiotic history, and oyster developmental stage. For pooling, individual colonies were grown overnight in liquid Zobell medium, then combined in equal volumes to create a representative pooled culture for each sample and condition. After centrifugation for 10 min at 5000 × g, genomic DNA was extracted from the pellet using the NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel), with DNA quality and concentration verified via NanoDrop and Qubit assays. Sequencing libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina) after adjusting the DNA concentration to 1 ng.μl−1. Equimolar libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 550 (Illumina, paired-end, 2 × 150 bp) at the BioEnvironment platform of the University of Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD, https://bio-environnement.univ-perp.fr/). Sequences assemblies and quality check was performed on a home-based cluster DATARMOR, the Ifremer’s supercomputer. Sequence reads were quality-checked using FastQC (v0.11.9) and trimmed with Trim Galore (v0.6.7) [32]. De novo assembly was performed with metaSPAdes (v3.15.4) [33] and assessed with QUAST (v5.0.2) [34]. Contigs were classified using PlasFlow (v1.1.0) into plasmid-like, chromosome-like, or unidentified sequences [35]. ARGs were identified with ABRicate (v1.0.1) against the ResFinder [36] and Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) [37] databases (minimum 65% coverage and identity) [38]. Metagenomes were annotated with Prokka (v1.14.6) [39], and ARG sequences were verified via Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) against GenBank. Incomplete ARG sequences were discarded, and the remaining sequences were aligned using MEGA11 (ClustalW) [40]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The resulting tree was visualized and refined using iTOL (v6) [41].
Quantification of ARGs by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
DNA from adult oysters (collected on Day 0, Fig. 1) and larvae (collected on Days 2, 7, and 15, Fig. 1) was prepared as described above. Primers were designed to target the CHL resistance genes (catA2; see Table S2) and were used to measure gene abundance in the samples, normalized to total bacterial load by quantifying the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes with Total_B_926F/Total_B_1062R primers. The qPCR reactions (1.5 μl total volume) included 1 μl SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX mix, 0.2 μM of each primer, and 0.5 μl template DNA (adjusted to 50 ng·μl−1). Thermal cycling was performed on a LightCycler 480 with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles (10 s at 95°C, 20 s at 60°C, 25 s at 72°C) and a subsequent melting curve analysis. Pooled DNA, positive plasmidic controls (Eurofins Genomics), and no-template controls were included in every run, and qPCR efficiency was determined using an 8-point, 10-fold dilution series. Samples with 16S rRNA gene cycle threshold (CT) values >30 were excluded, and relative ARG abundance was expressed as the ratio of the log of absolute catA2 and 16S rRNA gene quantifications, as previously described [42].
Comparative analysis of plasmid genomes
Two catA2-positive isolates (Interactions Hôtes Pathogènes Environnements (IHPE) 6488 collected from sperm on Day 0 and IHPE 6718 collected from larvae on Day 7), differing in saccharose fermentation on TCBS, were randomly selected for Nanopore sequencing to confirm catA2 localization on a plasmid. DNA from an overnight pure bacterial culture in Zobell medium supplemented with CHL at 20°C was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega). MinION Nanopore sequencing and assembly were performed by Eurofins Genomics (Germany). Isolate identification was based on Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI, FastANI v1.3) and core-genome analysis. Core-genome alignment (474 concatenated genes, ≥90% BLAST identity, present in >99% of genomes) was generated using Roary (v3.13.0), and a maximum-likelihood tree was constructed with IQ-TREE (v2.3.3) using 1000 bootstraps, then visualized with iTOL (v6).
For plasmid prevalence assessment, 347 isolates recovered on TCBS (without antibiotics) were screened by PCR and confirmed by sequencing. Briefly, DNA from strains positive for catA2 and tr1, with 16S rRNA genes used as a quality control (see Table S2 for primer details), was extracted from 1 ml of an overnight culture in Luria Broth (LB) + 0.5 M NaCl at 20°C, using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) and sequenced on the NextSeq System. Genome assemblies were generated with SPAdes (v4.1.0) and assessed using QUAST (v5.0.2). Plasmid scaffolding was then manually done by aligning reads against previously obtained Nanopore assemblies.
For plasmid comparison, the 27 most similar plasmids from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database were analyzed to assess synteny and phylogenetic relationships (see Table S3 for plasmid metadata). All plasmids were reoriented to begin at the repA helicase gene, in accordance with the reference plasmid pAQU1 from Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae 04Ya311 (NC_016983.1). Gene prediction and functional annotation were performed using Bakta (v1.10.1) [43]. The ARG identification was performed using the Abricate tool with the ResFinder database, applying a threshold of 70% coverage and 80% identity, which ensures accurate identification according to established criteria [44]. A phylogenetic tree was generated with PanACoTA (v1.4.1) [45], using a 30% identity threshold for gene clustering and a 90% presence cutoff to define the persistent genome. Phylogenetic inference was then performed with IQ-TREE2 (v2.0.3) [46] under the General Time Reversible (GTR) model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Plasmid synteny was assessed using the MMseqs2 cluster module (v15.6f452) [47], followed by ordering based on Mash distances (v2.3) [48]. Visualization was achieved with pyGenomeViz (v1.4.1) [49] and final figures were refined using Inkscape.
Plasmid persistence assays
A 10-day plasmid persistence assay was conducted to assess the stability of the resistance plasmid in IHPE 6488 and IHPE 6718 strains. Single colonies were cultured overnight in LB + 0.5 M NaCl with CHL to ensure full plasmid retention (T0), then subcultured daily (1:100) for 10 days in media with or without CHL at 5 mg.l−1 (n = 4 for each condition). Cultures were incubated at 20°C with shaking. On Days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10, samples were collected for DNA extraction by boiling at 99°C for 10 min and then diluted 1:100 in DNase-free water and stored at −20°C. Plasmid persistence was measured by qPCR, based on the ratio of the plasmid-encoded tr2 gene to the single-copy chromosomal recA gene [50]. Standard curves were generated using known quantities (∼106–102 molecules per reaction) of plasmids pCRTM2.1-Tr (4062 bp) and pCRTM2.1-RecA (4067 bp), constructed by cloning the tr2 and recA genes into pCRTM2.1 using a TA Cloning kit. In these assays, 4 μl of diluted lysate was added to a 25 μl reaction containing LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master and 0.2 μM of each primer. Thermal cycling conditions were: 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 25 s, followed by a melting curve analysis.
Plasmid conjugation assays
Filter mating assays were conducted to assess plasmid transfer between Vibrio strains. Donor and recipient strains were distinguished by colony color on TCBS agar. IHPE 6488 (green colonies) was mated with V. crassostreae J2-9 and V. alginolyticus OE12 (yellow colonies), whereas IHPE 6718 (yellow colonies) was paired with V. atlanticus LGP32 and V. parahaemolyticus IFVp22 (green colonies) (Table S4). Donor and recipient overnight cultures in LB + 0.5 M NaCl were mixed 1:1, centrifuged for 5 min at 2000 × g, resuspended in 50 μl fresh medium, and applied to 0.45 μm filters on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates (with 15 g·L−1 NaCl). After overnight incubation at 25°C, cells were resuspended in 2 ml LB + 0.5 M NaCl and plated on TCBS agar with and without CHL at 5 mg.l−1, to count recipients and transconjugants. Transfer efficiency was calculated as the transconjugant-to-recipient ratio.
To confirm self-transferability, a second mating was performed using plasmid-bearing V. atlanticus LGP32* as the donor and V. alginolyticus OE12 as the recipient. IHPE 6718 was also mated with kanamycin-resistant E. coli π3813 on TSA supplemented with thymidine (0.3 mM) to compensate recipient auxotrophy; in this case, selective plating was done on LB with thymidine and kanamycin, with or without CHL. Plasmid transfer was confirmed by colony-PCR targeting species markers and the tr1 gene (primers in Table S2; PCR conditions in Supplementary Methods 1.3).
Minimum inhibitory concentration assays
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays were performed to assess the susceptibility of plasmid donor strains (IHPE 6488 and IHPE 6718) and their derived transconjugants to CHL and TET. Following CLSI VET03 and VET04 guidelines, 2-fold serial dilutions of CHL and TET (128–0.25 mg.l−1) were prepared from 10 g.l−1 ethanol stock solutions in sterile Milli-Q water [51, 52]. Ten microliters of each dilution were added to 96-well plates. Bacterial suspensions originated from an overnight culture in appropriate media of a single colony, were adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard in Cation-Adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB) (with 1% NaCl added for V. atlanticus LGP32). A volume of 90 μl of each suspension was inoculated per well, followed by incubation at 25°C or 35°C for 18 h with shaking at 150 rpm to ensure optimal growth for Vibrio bacteria. MIC values were determined visually as the lowest concentration showing no visible bacterial growth. Optical density at 600 nm was also measured using a TECAN Infinite M200 plate reader, to confirm the visual assessment and ensure reproducibility between replicates. E. coli CIP 76.24 (ATCC 25922) served as a control, yielding MICs within the expected CLSI ranges: 2–8 mg.l−1 for CHL and 0.5–2 mg.l−1 for TET. Sterile controls with media and antibiotics were included in each assay.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using R Studio (ver. 4.3.2). To compare the proportion of CHL-resistant Vibrio isolates between A− and CHL treatments, an analysis of variance (ANOVA, F-test) was performed, using the function AovSum. To compare the relative abundance of ARGs in larvae and gonads between A− and CHL-treated broodstock groups obtained from qPCR analysis, the Mann–Whitney test was employed due to the non-normal distribution of the data.
Data availability
Whole-genome sequencing and pool-sequencing data of antibiotic-resistant bacteria collected at the hatchery, as part of the Spare-Sea project, are available in the European Nucleotide Archive under accession numbers PRJEB89088 and PRJEB89075, respectively.
Results
Use of CHL increases CHL-resistance rates in Vibrio bacteria isolated from the hatchery
Antibiotics were applied during broodstock conditioning at D-47 and early larval development at D+2 (Fig. 1). Whereas treatments had no significant effect on oyster survival (Fig. S1), they strongly impacted the abundance of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARBs) in the hatchery system (Fig. 2A). During broodstock conditioning, ARBs were monitored in seawater. CHL treatment markedly increased CHL-resistant Vibrio rates, measured as the proportion of colonies growing on CHL-supplemented TCBS plates: 61.7% at D-27, 68.2% at D-13, and 14.9% at D0, compared to ≤1.1% in untreated controls. These elevated resistance levels persisted until reproduction at D0, up to 42 days post-CHL treatment.
Figure 2.
Increased prevalence of CHL-resistant determinants in seawater and oyster tissues following CHL treatment. (A) The percentage shown corresponds to the proportion of CHL-resistant Vibrio isolates—i.e., those collected on TCBS agar supplemented with CHL—relative to the total number of Vibrio isolates collected on TCBS agar without CHL Proportions are shown based on the treatment history of the broodstock: no antibiotic treatment (A−) and CHL treatment (CHL). Seawater samples were analyzed at Days −27 (D-27), −13 (D-13), and 0 (D0), while oyster tissues, including gametes, were analyzed on Day 0 (D0), larvae on Days 2 (D+2), 7 (D+7), and 15 (D+15) and spat on Day 105 (D + 105). Significant difference in relative abundance of CHL-resistant bacteria between A− and CHL treatment is denoted by an asterisk (*), as determined by the analysis of variance (ANOVA, F-test) (P < .05). Details of bacterial counting are provided in supplementary material Table S5. (B) catA2 and catB9 are widespread among putative culturable Vibrio strains in the hatchery, with catA2 predicted to be plasmid-born. Midpoint-rooted phylogenetic tree of nucleotide sequences of chloramphenicol resistance genes is shown, with predictions of sequence origin: plasmid or chromosome. ClustalW and Neighbor-Joining algorithms were used, with bootstrap values calculated from 1000 replications. Two genes were identified, catA2 and catB9; accession numbers of their reference sequences are depicted in bold. Sample type (seawater or oyster tissue), date of collection (from Period 1 to 2), and antibiotic treatment history are indicated on the right. Details of pool sequencing analysis and ARGs are provided in Tables S6 and S7. C. catA2 gene persists longer in progenies from CHL-treated oysters. Relative abundance of catA2 in both gonads, larvae, and spat samples over time were determined by qPCR. Relative abundance between samples from broodstock treated without antibiotics (A−) is depicted in green, whereas those treated with CHL are depicted in red. At Day 0 (D0) during reproduction, gonads from the broodstock were analyzed, while larvae were analyzed at Days 2 (D+2), 7 (D+7), and 15 (D+15) and spat at Day 105 (D+105). Relative abundance is expressed as the ratio of the log of absolute catA2 and 16S rRNA gene quantifications, as previsouly described [53]. Significant differences in relative abundance of each gene between treatments A− and CHL are denoted by asterisks (*), as determined by the Mann–Whitney test (P < .05, n ≥ 6). Values below the detection limit indicate samples in which the ARG was not detected, whereas 16S rRNA genes were successfully amplified. Details of collected oyster tissues and sample names are provided in Table S8.
During larval development, ARBs were tracked directly in oyster tissues. CHL-resistant Vibrio bacteria were detected in gametes and larvae from CHL-treated broodstock: 10% at D0, 4.6% at D+2, 2.0% at D+7, and 5.4% at D+15, before disappearing by D+105. In the control group, no resistant bacteria were found in gametes, and CHL-resistant Vibrio bacteria dropped from 5.5% at D+2 to undetectable levels by D+15. CHL exposure thus significantly increased the proportion of CHL-resistant Vibrio bacteria in both water and oyster tissues (ANOVA, F-test, P = .01456). In contrast, FLO and FLU had no detectable impact under our conditions, as no resistant Vibrio bacteria were recovered on selective media. No CHL-resistant strains were detected in the incoming seawater, indicating that resistant Vibrio bacteria likely originated from treated broodstock and/or seawater within the system.
CHL-resistance genes are widespread in culturable Vibrio bacteria from the hatchery
We analyzed the resistome of CHL-resistant Vibrio bacteria isolated throughout the hatchery cycle (Fig. 2B). Pool sequencing revealed several ARGs, including dfrA6, qnrS2, tet(34), tet(35), tet(B), catA2, and catB9. Among CHL-resistance genes, catA2 sequences were 100% identical to each other and showed 89.6% identity and 100% coverage to the reference sequence (X53796). In contrast, catB9 sequences were more divergent, displaying variable similarity both to each other and to the reference (53%–59% identity, 67%–89% coverage; AF462019). Both genes were consistently detected from D-27 to D+15, across seawater and oyster samples, regardless of treatment. Long-read sequencing confirmed that catA2 was plasmid-encoded and catB9 chromosomal.
Parental CHL-treatment has long-lasting effects on the progeny resistome
We then assessed catA2 prevalence in oyster tissues during larval development using qPCR (Fig. 2C). On D0, catA2 was significantly more abundant in gonads from CHL-treated broodstock (P = .0054, Mann–Whitney test). This difference persisted in larvae at D+2 (P = .0281) and D+7 (P = .0070), with catA2 detectable only in CHL progeny by D+15. By D+105, no signal was detected. These results show that CHL exposure leads to a prolonged enrichment of plasmid-borne catA2 in early oyster development, with a gradual clearance over time.
catA2 colocalizes with tet(B) on a conjugative pAQU-type plasmid termed pAQU-MAN
We focused our efforts on the plasmid-encoded catA2 gene because its well-documented role in CHL (and fusidic acid) resistance made it the most likely candidate underlying CHL resistance in our Vibrio isolates [24, 54]. In contrast, the chromosomal catB9 gene—previously reported as unrelated to CHL resistance in Vibrio bacteria [55–57]—was not investigated further. The plasmid was sequenced from two hatchery isolates, V. coralliirubri IHPE 6488 and V. cyclitrophicus IHPE 6718—both members of the Splendidus clade—as determined by core genome phylogenetic analysis and ANI value (Fig. S2, Table S9). Its sequence was nearly identical (>99.99% similarity) in the two strains with a size ranging from 169 524 bp to 170 776 bp in the V. coralliirubri and V. cyclitrophicus strains, respectively (Fig. S3). The catA2-carrying plasmids were predicted to be conjugative, as inferred by the presence of the tra machinery system (Fig. 3A). Other important plasmid features included a replication/partition/termination system including parA/parB, several transposases and insertion sequences, and antibiotic resistance genes, notably two catA2 genes and one tet(B) gene (Fig. 3A, Table S10).
Figure 3.
Chloramphenicol resistance genes, along with tetracycline resistance genes, are located on a pAQU-type plasmid, named pAQU-MAN (plasmid AQUatic – Marine ANtimicrobial resistance). (A) The circular map of the pAQU-MAN plasmid shows a transposase-rich region with a duplicated catA2 in an inverted repeat, along with tet(B). From the inside to the outside: (i) guanine cytosine (GC) content and (ii) putative CDS functions of the pAQU-MAN plasmid. Two regions were rich in tra genes, Tra1 and Tra2; parA/parB correspond to the partition system, and tus encodes for the replication terminus site-binding protein.
(B) Zoomed-in view of the variable region, likely highlighting a hotspot for gene exchange. The synteny plots show structural variation among pAQU-MAN and six closely related pAQU-type plasmids. Clustering was performed using MMseqs2 with 30% identity and 50% coverage thresholds, resulting in 153 core, 77 accessory, and 115 singleton genes across the full-length plasmids. In pAQU-MAN, catA2 is duplicated and flanked by transposase Tn3 and insertion sequences IS4 and IS5, all located within a predicted inverted repeat (IR) region. Full genome annotations and ARG details are provided in Tables S10 and S11.
Plasmids carrying catA2 belonged to the pAQU-type family, showing high similarity (>85% coverage, >99.80% identity) to known pAQU plasmids such as pAQU1 (AP026782.1), pAQU2 (AB856327.1), pVP7-1 (CP150866.1), pC704 (OP958859.1), p1 (CP080480.1), and p345-185 (CP025539.1), all from Vibrio or Photobacterium spp. Core genome and synteny analysis of 27 related plasmids from the literature confirmed a highly conserved backbone among pAQU types (Fig. S4, Table S3), with pAQU-MAN showing closest similarity to pAQU1 and pAQU2 (Fig. S4). These plasmids diverged in a region enriched in ARGs, transposases, and insertion sequences (Fig. 3B), suggesting a hotspot for gene exchange. In pAQU-MAN, this region contained two identical catA2 genes within an inverted repeat (IR) sequence. We named this plasmid pAQU-MAN, for plasmid AQUatic Marine ANtimicrobial resistance.
We then focused on this important recombination hotspot, which may drive the exchange and spread of ARGs under selective pressure. Varying numbers of ARGs, ranging from 0 and up to 23, were found on publicly available pAQU-type plasmids (Fig. 4, right panel, Table S11), indicating that this plasmid family has the potential to confer resistance to a broad spectrum of antibiotics, including rifamycin, aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, bleomycin, phenicols, diaminopyrimidines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, sulphonamides, and tetracyclines. pAQU-MAN shared the catA2 gene with pC704 only, whereas tet(B) was present in 14 out of 29 plasmids. Some closely related plasmids contained different sets of ARGs. Only the more divergent plasmids (e.g. pTUMSAT-OK1, pTUMSAT-OK2, pVPS91, p2743, SB1_p1) lacked ARGs entirely.
Figure 4.
pAQU-MAN belongs to emerging multi-drug-resistant pAQU-type plasmids in the aquatic environment. Phylogenetic tree based on core genome analysis (111 gene families) from 27 closely related plasmids identified in Vibrio and Photobacterium strains. The two pAQU-MAN plasmids identified in this study are highlighted in bold. Core genome was defined using PanACoTA with a 30% identity threshold and 90% persistence, and resulted in 107 core, 314 accessory, and 278 singleton genes. The tree was constructed with IQ-TREE using the GTR model and 1000 bootstrap replicates. To the right, a heatmap illustrates both the presence/absence and the number of copies of ARGs within these plasmids, categorized by the antibiotic classes they confer resistance to. Results were obtained using the Abricate tool with the ResFinder database, applying a threshold of 70% coverage and 80% identity, which ensures accurate identification according to established criteria [44].
pAQU-MAN spread rapidly in five Vibrio species within the hatchery
We further asked whether pAQU-MAN could have spread between Vibrio species in the hatchery. Out of 347 isolates collected from D-27 to D+15 on nonelective media, 25 isolates (7.2%) were presumed to carry pAQU-MAN, as determined by PCR detection of the tr and catA2 genes. Sequencing of these 25 positive isolates revealed that all pAQU-MAN-carrying bacteria belonged to the Splendidus clade, with V. splendidus being the most common (18 isolates) (Fig. 5). Other species included V. coralliirubri, V. crassostreae, V. cyclitrophicus, and V. lentus. These results show the rapid and efficient spread of pAQU-MAN between Vibrio species in the hatchery.
Figure 5.
pAQU-MAN circulates between five Vibrio species in the hatchery. Phylogenetic distribution of pAQU-MAN-carrying isolates among 231 representative Vibrionaceae genomes, species is shown. The 27 genomes carrying pAQU-MAN, identified in this study are highlighted. They all belong to the Vibrio clade Splendidus, specifically to species such as V. splendidus, V. lentus, V. cyclitrophicus, V. crassostreae, and V. coralliirubri. Sample type (seawater or oyster tissue), collection period, and the antibiotic treatment history of the broodstock are also indicated. In addition, fifteen Vibrionaceae genomes previously identified in the literature and available in public databases are shown, all containing pAQU-like plasmids. Pangenome analysis using PanACoTA v1.4.0 (75% identity, 90% persistence) identified 491 persistent gene families. The tree was inferred with IQ-TREE2 (v2.3.6, GTR model, 1000 ultrafast bootstraps), and rooted using Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 (GCF_000146165.2). Details of previously published genome sequences in Table S12.
pAQU-MAN is a highly stable even in the absence of selective pressure
We tested the stability of the pAQU-MAN plasmid in its host strains, in particular V. coralliirubri IHPE 6488 and V. cyclitrophicus IHPE 6718, by measuring the plasmid-to-genome ratio over a 10-day period with and without selective pressure. The ratio, calculated as the tr/recA gene ratio, showed no significant changes between treatments, indicating high plasmid stability. Both strains exhibited stable plasmid copy numbers (2.3 ± 0.2 for IHPE 6488 and 2 ± 0.1 for IHPE 6718) throughout the study (Fig. 6A and B). Therefore, pAQU-MAN also appeared highly stable in its host strains.
Figure 6.
The pAQU-MAN plasmid is a low copy number, stable over time, and capable of conferring phenotypic resistance through conjugative transfer to strains of the Vibrio harveyi and Splendidus clades, as well as E. coli. (A) pAQU-MAN plasmid is present at two copies per Vibrio genome. The plasmid copy number (PCN) for V. coralliirubri IHPE 6488 and V. cyclitrophicus IHPE 6718 was determined via qPCR by calculating the ratio of the tr gene, located on the plasmid, to recA, a single-copy chromosomal gene. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) with n = 3. (B) pAQU-MAN plasmid is highly stable. The persistence of the plasmid in V. coralliirubri IHPE 6488 and V. cyclitrophicus IHPE 6718 was assessed over 10 days, with and without CHL, using the tr/recA ratio from the qPCR experiment. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) with n = 4. The gray dashed line represents the previously determined PCN, used as a reference value. (C) High conjugation frequency of the pAQU-MAN plasmid. The frequency of plasmid transfer by conjugation was measured from Vibrio strains IHPE 6488 and IHPE 6718 to several strains of the Vibrio clades Harveyi and Splendidus, as well as to E. coli. The transconjugant strain V. atlanticus LGP32*, carrying the plasmid, was subsequently used to transfer the plasmid to V. alginolyticus OE12, demonstrating the plasmid's ability to self-transfer. ND, not determined. (D) pAQU-MAN confers resistance to CHL and TET. Following conjugation, phenotypic resistance to chloramphenicol (CHL) and tetracycline (TET) conferred by the presence of the plasmid was assessed across a concentration range from 125 to 0.25 mg.l−1. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of strains carrying pAQU-MAN (Plasmid+) are presented alongside those of strains not carrying the plasmid (Plasmid−). The strain CIP 76.24 was used as a control, following the CLSI and EUCAST standards.
pAQU-MAN is a highly transferable plasmid conferring resistance to CHL and TET
Plasmids that can replicate in a broad range of hosts are of concern as they may drive gene exchange across large phylogenetic distances. Therefore, we tested experimentally the transferability of the pAQU-MAN plasmid using filter conjugation assays. pAQU-MAN was successfully transferred from V. coralliirubri IHPE 6488 to V. crassostreae J2_9 (i.e. within the Splendidus clade) and V. alginolyticus OE12 (i.e. to the Harveyi clade) with conjugation frequencies of 8.83 × 10−3 and 1.43 × 10−3, respectively. From V. cyclitrophicus IHPE 6718, the plasmid was transferred to V. tasmaniensis LGP32 (i.e. within the Splendidus clade), V. parahaemolyticus IFVp22 (i.e. to the Harveyi clade), and E. coli π3813 (outside Vibrionaceae) with frequencies of 1.43 × 10−1, 3.30 × 10−5, and 1.30 × 10−1, respectively (Fig. 6C). Plasmid presence in all transconjugants was confirmed by PCR (Fig. S5). We observed that the V. tasmaniensis LGP32 transconjugant carrying pAQU-MAN (thereafter labeled with a *) was able to transfer the plasmid to V. alginolyticus OE12, demonstrating the potential for further horizontal gene transfer between Vibrio clades.
Transconjugants became resistant to CHL and TET, as determined by MIC testing. In the Splendidus clade, the transconjugants J2_9* and LGP32* exhibited MICs of 32 mg.l−1 for CHL and 4 and 8 mg.l−1 for TET, respectively, compared to wild-type MICs of 0.5 mg.l−1 for CHL and ≤0.25 mg.l−1 for TET. Similarly, the Harveyi clade transconjugants, OE12* and IFVp22*, showed high MICs for CHL (128 and 64 mg.l−1) and TET (64 mg.l−1) compared to their respective wild-type strains (MIC of 1 mg.l−1 for both antibiotics). Finally, the E. coli π3813* transconjugant exhibited MICs of 128 mg.l−1 for CHL and >128 mg.l−1 for TET, whereas the wild-type strain had MICs of 8 and 128 mg.l−1, respectively (Fig. 6D). These results confirm that pAQU-MAN confers significant resistance to CHL and TET when transferred between a broad range of bacterial hosts. pAQU-MAN, therefore, has the potential to disseminate antibiotic resistance across large phylogenetic distances.
Discussion
In a context of global expansion of aquaculture, our study reveals the impact of antibiotic use—here CHL—on the development and dynamics of ARGs, which spread between Vibrio populations circulating in hatcheries of M. gigas oysters through a highly transmissible plasmid called pAQU-MAN. The conjugative plasmid newly identified in this study was shown to propagate the catA2 gene, conferring CHL-resistance to a broad range of Vibrio species in the hatchery. This plasmid belongs to a conserved family of pAQU-type plasmids, which are found in Vibrio spp. and Photobacterium spp. Isolated from aquaculture settings worldwide, they are considered emerging multidrug-resistant (MDR) conjugative plasmids in aquatic environments [58]. Initially reported in Japan, followed by studies in China, and more recently on the southeastern Turkish coast of the Black Sea, pAQU-type plasmids could serve as key players in the spread of TET resistance due to the high prevalence of associated ARGs in this plasmid family [58–64]. Our study supports this assumption. Indeed, two copies of catA2 co-occurred with a tet(B) gene in pAQU-MAN. These genes conferred CHL- and TET resistance upon pAQU-MAN conjugative transfer to new bacterial hosts. Moreover, our study showed that the CHL-induced propagation of pAQU-MAN in the hatchery has far-reaching consequences on the spread of unrelated ARG families such as tet(B), warning us of the multiple consequences of the use of antibiotics in aquaculture worldwide. This characterization of a pAQU-type plasmid in Europe highlights the ongoing global dissemination of these MDR plasmids, potentially linked to international movement and trade of mollusks and their associated bacteria.
Broad-host-range conjugative plasmids pose a significant risk as they enable the transfer of multiple AMR genes between diverse bacterial species [65]. In this study, we show that pAQU-MAN efficiently transfers to the oyster pathogens V. crassostreae and V. atlanticus from the Splendidus clade, as well as to Vibrio species of the Harveyi clade, which includes human pathogens V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus. pAQU-MAN also transfers to E. coli at high conjugation efficiency, as also reported for other pAQU-type plasmids [60, 61, 66]. Thus, environmental bacteria carrying pAQU-MAN and other pAQU-type plasmids can disseminate resistance across a wide range of phylogenetically distant host bacteria, including both oyster and human pathogens. pAQU-MAN-mediated CHL-resistance was also found to be host-dependent, with lower resistance levels in commensal Vibrio strains and higher resistance in the human pathogens tested. Although pAQU-MAN may not pose an immediate threat to commensal bacteria, its ability to transfer to pathogens and enhance their resistance highlights the need to monitor commensals as reservoirs of pAQU-type plasmids in general. By efficiently spreading across Vibrionaceae and beyond, they could facilitate the transfer of diverse ARG families across habitats [3] and increase the risk of AMR transmission to human pathogens, particularly through the consumption of food products such as oysters, which are eaten raw.
We highlighted the existence of a hypervariable region rich in ARGs (up to 23 per plasmid) nested in the highly conserved plasmid backbone of 27 pAQU-type plasmids homologous to pAQU-MAN. This region was also rich in ISs, which are known to play an important role in genome evolution and plasticity [67]. It has recently been demonstrated that ISs are key mediators of ARG exchange between conjugative plasmids and chromosomes [68]; the frequent proximity of ISs with ARGs on plasmids suggests a significant role in the recruitment and transfer of AMR genes between phylogenetically distant bacteria. Comparison of pAQU-type plasmids reveals that they serve as platforms for a broad diversity of ARGs, with a total of 33 different ARGs identified in this study. Although TET resistance determinants such as tet(59), tet(B), tet(M) are common in pAQU-type plasmids, catA2—present on the newly described pAQU-MAN—was less frequently observed. To our knowledge, only one pAQU-type plasmid, pC704 from V. alginolyticus, has been reported to carry the catA2 gene. pAQU-MAN carries two identical catA2 sequences within an IR region, whereas pC704 contains a single copy of this gene. IR consists of symmetric nucleotidic sequences with reverse complementary DNA, which are known to promote genome instability [69, 70]. This could further account for the elevated potential for DNA rearrangements in this region, though further research is needed to better understand transposition events within this plasmid and the broader implications for the spread of AMR.
Even though plasmid host range, conjugation efficiency, and plasticity determine the propensity of plasmid-borne ARGs to disseminate efficiently, successful transfer is not guaranteed unless the plasmid is stably maintained in the recipient bacterial host [71]. pAQU-MAN exhibited high stability, demonstrating its ability to persist in a bacterial population without positive selection, as we observed here in monocultures. Like other pAQU-type plasmids, it is a low-copy plasmid, large in size (170 kb), which offers an advantage over high-copy plasmids by reducing the metabolic burden on the host, thereby ensuring higher stability and maintenance [72]. The observed plasmid stability seems to be a common trait of pAQU-type plasmids: pAQU1 plasmid remains stable for up to 30 days in P. damselae subsp. damselae 04Ya311, without TET [73], while it was maintained in the fly intestine for up to 5 days, their persistence exceeding 7 days in E. coli [74]. Attempts to cure the pAQU-MAN plasmid from V. coralliirubri IHPE 6488 and V. cyclitrophycus IHPE 6718 by introducing a counter-selectable marker (CcdB toxin)—a method we previously used successfully in other Vibrio species [75]—were unsuccessful, as we could not obtain plasmid-cured isolates (data not shown). Such difficulties in plasmid loss are often due to the presence of toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems, which assure plasmid maintenance in bacteria and prevent postsegregational killing of plasmid-free cells [76] and are present in >85% of conjugative plasmids [68]. Although we did not identify any canonical TA systems in pAQU-MAN, we did detect sequences with high similarity to putative toxin rhs elements (locus tags J47SPOVO_00002, J47SPOVO_00005, J47SPOVO_00008), which share mechanistic similarities with TA modules and may contribute to pAQU-MAN stability [77]. Further investigation is needed to explore the function of these genes and their role in plasmid stability.
Given their highly efficient spread by conjugation and their stability in monocultures, pAQU-MAN plasmids would be predicted to be maintained in the hatchery over long periods of time. However, CHL-resistant strains harboring pAQU-MAN plasmids disappeared from the community after D+15. It should be highlighted that plasmid stability in a monoculture does not necessarily reflect its stability within bacterial communities. Indeed, the community context can affect plasmid spread through a dilution effect, where proficient hosts maintain and repeatedly transfer a plasmid to less proficient hosts—with lower plasmid stability and transmission efficiency—which ultimately drive the plasmid to extinction [3]. Although not investigated here, a variety of bacterial antiplasmid systems have been documented [78–80]. Some have been discovered in the genus Vibrio, like the DdmDE system, which rapidly eliminates small, multicopy plasmids from V. cholerae [81], or DdmABC, which eliminates large plasmids from the population in the absence of antibiotic selection, by imposing a high fitness cost that favors plasmid-free cells [82]. Although the reason explaining pAQU-MAN decline in the hatchery is not yet resolved, it has been postulated that plasmid defense systems may have contributed to the decline of IncC MDR plasmids in V. cholerae seventh pandemic strains [82]. Another alternative is the intervention of predators that target bacteria carrying plasmids. Phages, for example, are known to play a crucial role as bacterial predators, shaping the structure, function, and evolution of natural microbial communities [83]. In previous studies, we observed that Vibrio populations are highly dynamic in natural ecosystems [75], likely in part due to phage predation [84]. Although most phages rely on chromosomally encoded cell surface structures as receptors, plasmid-dependent phages have been identified that utilize plasmid-encoded conjugation proteins or pilus [85]. These plasmid-dependent phages have been proposed to serve as a significant but often overlooked constraint on the spread of conjugative plasmids [86].
Conclusion
This study represents the earliest documented characterization of pAQU-type MDR plasmids in Europe, previously limited to Asia and Turkey, revealing a recent concerning spread with implications for aquaculture management. Although banned in the European Union (EU) and many other countries, CHL use can persist sporadically in key shellfish aquaculture regions [9]. We showed here that CHL promotes the selection of plasmid-borne ARGs, specifically catA2 and tet(B), driving MDR. The genetic localization of ARGs within IS-rich regions suggests that DNA exchanges likely occur upon environmental selection, further facilitating resistance selection and spread. The high stability of the pAQU-MAN plasmid in Vibrio bacteria, even in the absence of selective pressure, exacerbates the potential for resistance dissemination and likely explains the persistence of these genes in the hatchery over several weeks. However, the natural decline of catA2 prevalence, becoming undetectable in oyster progenies by 3 months, when they are ready for deployment in the field, is reassuring as it suggests that resistant bacteria are unlikely to spread through oysters into the environment. Nevertheless, the release of CHL-resistant (catA2-positive) bacteria during broodstock conditioning should be considered in treating aquaculture facility wastewater. Although initially found in commensal Vibrio isolates, the pAQU-MAN plasmid can easily transfer to pathogenic oyster and human Vibrio strains, and to E. coli, posing significant risks to both animal and human health. Overall, this study highlights the critical need for surveillance of Vibrio strains carrying pAQU-type plasmids and the establishment of standardized guidelines for detecting resistance in aquatic environments. Such measures are essential for improving the management and containment of AMR in aquatic systems, safeguarding both human and animal health, and providing valuable insights into future strategies to mitigate AMR risks.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support of the Ifremer facilities of Bouin and Argenton: “Atlantic Marine Molluscs Experimental” EMMA and PHYTNESS units, France. We thank the Bio-Environment platform (University of Perpignan Via Domitia) and Jean-François Allienne for support in library preparation and sequencing, as well as the qPHD platform/Montpellier genomix for access to qPCR. The authors acknowledge the Pôle de Calcul et de Données Marines (PCDM; wwz.ifremer.fr/en/Research-Technology/Research-Infrastructures/Digital-infrastructures/Computation-Centre) for providing DATARMOR computing and storage resources. Finally, we warmly thank Dr Dominique Hervio-Heath (ifremer) for kindly providing the Vibrio parahaemolyticus IFVp22 strain.
Contributor Information
Julia Mougin, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Yannick Labreuche, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Viviane Boulo, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
David Goudenège, IFREMER, IRSI, SeBiMER Service de Bioinformatique de l’Ifremer, ZI de la Pointe du Diable, 29280 Plouzané, France.
Jamal Saad, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Gaelle Courtay, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Jacqueline Le Grand, IFREMER, Unité écoPHYsiologie et Traits d'histoire de vie des orgaNismES marinS (PHYTNESS), ZI de la Pointe du Diable, 29280 Plouzané, France; Laboratoire des sciences de l'environnement marin (LEMAR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale, CNRS, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, Rue Dumont D'urville, 29280 Plouzané, France.
Oriane Chevalier, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Juliette Pouzadoux, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Caroline Montagnani, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Marie-Agnès Travers, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Bruno Petton, IFREMER, Unité écoPHYsiologie et Traits d'histoire de vie des orgaNismES marinS (PHYTNESS), ZI de la Pointe du Diable, 29280 Plouzané, France; Laboratoire des sciences de l'environnement marin (LEMAR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale, CNRS, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, Rue Dumont D'urville, 29280 Plouzané, France.
Delphine Destoumieux-Garzón, IHPE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, place E. Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This research was supported by the ERA-net cofound Aquatic Pollutants program of the combined European Joint Program Initiatives JPI Oceans, JPI Water and JPI AMR. It has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 869178-AquaticPollutants. This study received support from the AquaticAMR project managed by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) as part of the investment programme France 2030 under the reference “ANR-21-EXES-0005”; from the Occitanie Region; and from the ExposUM Institute of the University of Montpellier. Julia Mougin received a 3-year postdoctoral fellowship from Ifremer, which supports this work. This work was carried out within the framework of the “Laboratoire d’Excellence (LabEx)” TULIP (ANR-10-LABX-41) and the "Zone Atelier" Camargue Health-Environment (ZACAM) of the Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research network (LTSER-RZA). It is supported by the International Research Project EcoHealth4Sea funded by the CNRS and the Sentinels project funded by CAPES-COFECUB (Sv1064/25 / Campus France : 52623VH).
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) repository. Whole-genome raw data of antibiotic-resistant bacteria were deposited under ENA accession number PRJEB89088 (ERX14309669 to ERX14309695), and are available on MicrosScope platform MaGe (“Magnifying Genomes,” https://mage.genoscope.cns.fr). Raw data of pool sequencing of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is available under ENA accession number PRJEB89075 (ERX14309344 to ERX14309355). Details of experiment accession numbers are provided in Tables S6 and S12 of the Supplementary Data.
References
- 1. O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance 2016, 80 pp. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 2. Munita JM, Arias CA. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4:10.1128 10.1128/9781555819286.ch17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Castañeda-Barba S, Top EM, Stalder T. Plasmids, a molecular cornerstone of antimicrobial resistance in the One Health era. Nat Rev Microbiol 2024;22:18–32. 10.1038/s41579-023-00926-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Liu Y-Y, Wang Y, Walsh TR. et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:161–8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. An T, Cai Y, Li G. et al. Prevalence and transmission risk of colistin and multidrug resistance in long-distance coastal aquaculture. ISME Commun 2023;3:115. 10.1038/s43705-023-00321-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Suyamud B, Chen Y, Dong Z. et al. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: occurrence and strategies in Southeast Asia. Sci Total Environ 2024;907:167942. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Reverter M, Sarter S, Caruso D. et al. Aquaculture at the crossroads of global warming and antimicrobial resistance. Nat Commun 2020;11:1870. 10.1038/s41467-020-15735-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH. et al. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature 2021;591:551–63. 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lulijwa R, Rupia EJ, Alfaro AC. Antibiotic use in aquaculture, policies and regulation, health and environmental risks: a review of the top 15 major producers. Rev Aquac 2020;12:640–63. 10.1111/raq.12344 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vezzulli L, Pezzati E, Brettar I. et al. Effects of global warming on Vibrio ecology. Microbiol Spectr 2015;3:10.1128/microbiolspec.ve-0004-2014. 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0004-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Baker-Austin C, Lake I, Archer E. et al. Stemming the rising tide of Vibrio disease. Lancet Planet Health 2024;8:e515–20. 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00124-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jeamsripong S, Khant W, Chuanchuen R. Distribution of phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from cultivated oysters and estuarine water. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2020;96:fiaa081. 10.1093/femsec/fiaa081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lopatek M, Wieczorek K, Osek J. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors, and genetic profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from seafood. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018;84:e00537–18. 10.1128/AEM.00537-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Elmahdi S, Parveen S, Ossai S. et al. Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus recovered from oysters during an oyster relay study. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018;84:e01790–17. 10.1128/AEM.01790-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Destoumieux-Garzón D, Mavingui P, Boëtsch G. et al. The one health concept: 10 years old and a long road ahead. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:14. 10.3389/fvets.2018.00014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. EFSA, Koutsoumanis K, Allende A. et al. Panel on biological hazards. Public health aspects of Vibrio spp. related to the consumption of seafood in the EU. EFSA J 2024;22:e8896. 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cattoir V, Poirel L, Mazel D. et al. Vibrio splendidus as the source of plasmid-mediated QnrS-like quinolone resistance determinants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:2650–1. 10.1128/aac.00070-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Briet A, Helsens N, Delannoy S. et al. NDM-1-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from imported seafood. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:2578–9. 10.1093/jac/dky200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dubert J, Osorio CR, Prado S. et al. Persistence of antibiotic resistant Vibrio spp. in shellfish hatchery environment. Microb Ecol 2016;72:851–60. 10.1007/s00248-015-0705-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Muetter M, Angst DC, Regoes RR. et al. The impact of treatment strategies on the epidemiological dynamics of plasmid-conferred antibiotic resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2024; 121:e2406818121. 10.1073/pnas.2406818121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kraychete GB, Bonelli RR, Picão RC. Green light for improving our understanding of AMR spread. Lancet Microbe 2024;5:e2–3. 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00331-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. WHO. World Health Organization List of Medically Important Antimicrobials . A Risk Management Tool for Mitigating Antimicrobial Resistance Due to Non-human Use. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hanekamp JC, Bast A. Antibiotics exposure and health risks: chloramphenicol. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2015;39:213–20. 10.1016/j.etap.2014.11.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schwarz S, Kehrenberg C, Doublet B. et al. Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol and florfenicol. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2004;28:519–42. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Guo X, Chen H, Tong Y. et al. A review on the antibiotic florfenicol: occurrence, environmental fate, effects, and health risks. Environ Res 2024;244:117934. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zeng Q, Liao C, Terhune J. et al. Impacts of florfenicol on the microbiota landscape and resistome as revealed by metagenomic analysis. Microbiome 2019;7:155. 10.1186/s40168-019-0773-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Samuelsen OB. Pharmacokinetics of quinolones in fish: a review. Aquaculture 2006;255:55–75. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.12.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Naviner M, Gordon L, Giraud E. et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas spp. isolated from the growth pond to the commercial product in a rainbow trout farm following a flumequine treatment. Aquaculture 2011;315:236–41. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.03.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Robert R, Miner P, Nicolas J. Mortality control of scallop larvae in the hatchery. Aquac Int 1996;4:305–13. 10.1007/BF00120947 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nicolas J-L, Corre S, Gauthier G. et al. Bacterial problems associated with scallop Pectenmaximus larval culture. Dis Aquat Org 1996;27:67–76. 10.3354/dao027067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. De Lorgeril J, Lucasson A, Petton B. et al. Immune-suppression by OsHV-1 viral infection causes fatal bacteraemia in Pacific oysters. Nat Commun 2018;9:4215. 10.1038/s41467-018-06659-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Krueger F. Trim Galore!: a wrapper around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to FastQ files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. Babraham Institute 2015. https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A. et al. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 2017;27:824–34. 10.1101/gr.213959.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N. et al. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013;29:1072–5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Krawczyk PS, Lipinski L, Dziembowski A. PlasFlow: predicting plasmid sequences in metagenomic data using genome signatures. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:e35–5. 10.1093/nar/gkx1321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E. et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020;75:3491–500. 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TT. et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48:D517–25. 10.1093/nar/gkz935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Seemann T. ABRicate: Mass Screening of Contigs for Antibiotic Resistance Genes. GitHub: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021;38:3022–7. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024;52:W78–82. 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Silvester R, Woodhall N, Nurmi W. et al. High-throughput qPCR profiling of antimicrobial resistance genes and bacterial loads in wastewater and receiving environments. Environ Pollut 2025;373:126096. 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA. et al. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genomics 2021;7:000685. 10.1099/mgen.0.000685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. EFSA . EFSA statement on the requirements for whole genome sequence analysis of microorganisms intentionally used in the food chain. EFSA J 2024;22:e8912. 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Perrin A, Rocha EP. PanACoTA: a modular tool for massive microbial comparative genomics. NAR Genom Bioinform 2021;3:lqaa106. 10.1093/nargab/lqaa106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020;37:1530–4. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Steinegger M, Söding J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol 2017;35:1026–8. 10.1038/nbt.3988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol 2016;17:132. 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Shimoyama Y. pyGenomeViz: a genome visualization python package for comparative genomics. 2022. https://moshi4.github.io/pyGenomeViz/
- 50. Đermić D, Ljubić S, Matulić M. et al. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) without the need for prior removal of DNA. Sci Rep 2023;13:11470. 10.1038/s41598-023-38383-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. CLSI VET03 . Methods for Antimicrobial Broth Dilution and Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Isolated from Aquatic Animals, 2nd edn. Wayne: VET03; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 52. CLSI VET04 . Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Isolated from Aquatic Animals, 3rd edn. Wayne: VET03 Supplement (VET04); Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Silvester R, Woodhall N, Nurmi W, et al. High-throughput qPCR profiling of antimicrobial resistance genes and bacterial loads in wastewater and receiving environments. Environ Pollut 2025;373: 126096. 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Völker TA, Iida S, Bickle TA. A single gene coding for resistance to both fusidic acid and chloramphenicol. J Mol Biol 1982;154:417–25. 10.1016/S0022-2836(82)80004-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Rowe-Magnus DA, Guerout AM, Mazel D. Bacterial resistance evolution by recruitment of super-integron gene cassettes. Mol Microbiol 2002;43:1657–69. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02861.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lepuschitz S, Baron S, Larvor E. et al. Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance traits of Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O139 isolated from a large Austrian lake frequently associated with cases of human infection. Front Microbiol 2019;10:2600. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zhang Q, Alter T, Strauch E. et al. Genetic and phenotypic virulence potential of non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae isolated from German retail seafood. Microorganisms 2023;11:2751. 10.3390/microorganisms11112751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Li R, Ye L, Wong MHY. et al. Evolution and comparative genomics of pAQU-like conjugative plasmids in Vibrio species. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72:2503–6. 10.1093/jac/dkx193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Nonaka L, Maruyama F, Miyamoto M. et al. Novel conjugative transferable multiple drug resistance plasmid pAQU1 from Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae isolated from marine aquaculture environment. Microbes Environ 2012;27:263–72. 10.1264/jsme2.ME11338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Nonaka L, Maruyama F, Onishi Y. et al. Various pAQU plasmids possibly contribute to disseminate tetracycline resistance gene tet (M) among marine bacterial community. Front Microbiol 2014;5:152. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Vences A, Abushattal S, Matanza XM. et al. Highly transferable pAQU-related plasmids encoding multidrug resistance are widespread in the human and fish pathogen Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae in aquaculture areas in the Black Sea. Microb Ecol 2020;80:507–18. 10.1007/s00248-020-01519-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Deng Y, Xu H, Su Y. et al. Horizontal gene transfer contributes to virulence and antibiotic resistance of Vibrio harveyi 345 based on complete genome sequence analysis. BMC Genomics 2019;20:761–19. 10.1186/s12864-019-6137-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Li R, Wong MHY, Zhou Y. et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of a conjugative plasmid carrying Bla PER-1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59:3582–4. 10.1128/aac.00518-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Xu Y, Zheng Z, Ye L. et al. Identification and genetic characterization of conjugative plasmids encoding coresistance to ciprofloxacin and cephalosporin in foodborne Vibrio spp. Microbiol Spectrum 2023;11:e01032–23. 10.1128/spectrum.01032-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Getino M, López-Díaz M, Ellaby N. et al. A broad-host-range plasmid outbreak: dynamics of IncL/M plasmids transferring carbapenemase genes. Antibiotics 2022;11:1641. 10.3390/antibiotics11111641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Kohyama Y, Suzuki S. Conjugative gene transfer between nourished and starved cells of Photobacterium damselae ssp. damselae and Escherichia coli. Microbes Environ 2019;34:388–92. 10.1264/jsme2.ME19099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Oliveira PH, Touchon M, Cury J. et al. The chromosomal organization of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. Nat Commun 2017;8:841. 10.1038/s41467-017-00808-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Che Y, Yang Y, Xu X. et al. Conjugative plasmids interact with insertion sequences to shape the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2021;118: e2008731118. 10.1073/pnas.2008731118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Lin C-T, Lin W-H, Lyu YL. et al. Inverted repeats as genetic elements for promoting DNA inverted duplication: implications in gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:3529–38. 10.1093/nar/29.17.3529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Bennett PM. Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br J Pharmacol 2008;153:S347–57. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 2000;405:299–304. 10.1038/35012500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Million-Weaver S, Camps M. Mechanisms of plasmid segregation: have multicopy plasmids been overlooked? Plasmid 2014;75:27–36. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2014.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Bien TLT, Sato-Takabe Y, Ogo M. et al. Persistence of multi-drug resistance plasmids in sterile water under very low concentrations of tetracycline. Microbes Environ 2015;30:339–43. 10.1264/jsme2.ME15122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Nawata K, Kadoya A, Suzuki S. Persistence of marine bacterial plasmid in the house fly (Musca domestica): marine-derived antimicrobial resistance genes have a chance of invading the human environment. Microb Ecol 2024;87:30. 10.1007/s00248-023-02341-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Bruto M, James A, Petton B. et al. Vibrio crassostreae, a benign oyster colonizer turned into a pathogen after plasmid acquisition. ISME J 2017;11:1043–52. 10.1038/ismej.2016.162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Unterholzner SJ, Poppenberger B, Rozhon W. Toxin–antitoxin systems: biology, identification, and application. Mob Genet Elem 2013;3:e26219. 10.4161/mge.26219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Stårsta M, Hammarlöf DL, Wäneskog M. et al. RHS-elements function as type II toxin-antitoxin modules that regulate intra-macrophage replication of Salmonella Typhimurium. PLoS Genet 2020;16:e1008607. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Bravo JP, Aparicio-Maldonado C, Nobrega FL. et al. Structural basis for broad anti-phage immunity by DISARM. Nat Commun 2022;13:2987. 10.1038/s41467-022-30673-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Liu HW, Roisné-Hamelin F, Beckert B. et al. DNA-measuring Wadjet SMC ATPases restrict smaller circular plasmids by DNA cleavage. Mol Cell 2022;82:4727–4740.e6. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science 2008;322:1843–5. 10.1126/science.1165771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Bravo JP, Ramos DA, Fregoso Ocampo R. et al. Plasmid targeting and destruction by the DdmDE bacterial defence system. Nature 2024;630:961–7. 10.1038/s41586-024-07515-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Jaskólska M, Adams DW, Blokesch M. Two defence systems eliminate plasmids from seventh pandemic Vibrio cholerae. Nature 2022;604:323–9. 10.1038/s41586-022-04546-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Kauffman KM, Chang WK, Brown JM. et al. Resolving the structure of phage–bacteria interactions in the context of natural diversity. Nat Commun 2022;13:372. 10.1038/s41467-021-27583-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Piel D, Bruto M, Labreuche Y. et al. Phage–host coevolution in natural populations. Nat Microbiol 2022;7:1075–86. 10.1038/s41564-022-01157-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Parra B, Cockx B, Lutz VT. et al. Isolation and characterization of novel plasmid-dependent phages infecting bacteria carrying diverse conjugative plasmids. Microbiol Spectrum 2024;12:e0253723–3. 10.1128/spectrum.02537-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Quinones-Olvera N, Owen SV, McCully LM. et al. Diverse and abundant phages exploit conjugative plasmids. Nat Commun 2024;15:3197. 10.1038/s41467-024-47416-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Whole-genome sequencing and pool-sequencing data of antibiotic-resistant bacteria collected at the hatchery, as part of the Spare-Sea project, are available in the European Nucleotide Archive under accession numbers PRJEB89088 and PRJEB89075, respectively.
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) repository. Whole-genome raw data of antibiotic-resistant bacteria were deposited under ENA accession number PRJEB89088 (ERX14309669 to ERX14309695), and are available on MicrosScope platform MaGe (“Magnifying Genomes,” https://mage.genoscope.cns.fr). Raw data of pool sequencing of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is available under ENA accession number PRJEB89075 (ERX14309344 to ERX14309355). Details of experiment accession numbers are provided in Tables S6 and S12 of the Supplementary Data.