Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Feb;110(2):129–132. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110129

Public health consequences of mercury spills: Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance system, 1993-1998.

Perri Zeitz 1, Maureen F Orr 1, Wendy E Kaye 1
PMCID: PMC1240725  PMID: 11836139

Abstract

We analyzed data from states that participated in the Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance (HSEES) system maintained by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry to describe the public health consequences of mercury releases. From 1993 through 1998, HSEES captured 406 events in which mercury was the only substance released. Schools and universities, private residences, and health care facilities were the most frequent locations involved in mercury events, and human error was the contributing factor for most of the releases. Fourteen persons experienced adverse health effects as a result of the releases. An additional 31 persons had documented elevated levels of mercury in the blood. No fatalities resulted. Evacuations were ordered in 90 (22%) of the events, and the length of evacuation ranged from 1 hr to 46 days. Mercury spills have a significant public health impact and economic burden. Some actions that could potentially lessen the consequences of mercury spills are to switch to mercury-free alternatives, train people in the safe handling and disposal of mercury, and keep mercury securely stored when it is necessary to have it on hand.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (500.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clayton J., Keil O. Managing mercury: viewpoints from inside the hospital. Med Waste Anal. 1993 Oct;2(1):6–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harvie J. Eliminating mercury use in hospital laboratories: a step toward zero discharge. Public Health Rep. 1999 Jul-Aug;114(4):353–358. doi: 10.1093/phr/114.4.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayes M. V. Managing mercury: simple, effective methods for cleaning up small spills. Regul Anal Med Waste. 1993 Sep;1(12):1, 3-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Monroe C. T. Mercury spills: an under-recognized hazard. Kans Med. 1998;98(3):30–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Monroe C. T., Pezzino G., Knoche L. L., Henning L., Belt P. Public health response to metallic mercury spills in Kansas. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Nov;5(6):13–17. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199911000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Okleshen W. Mercury rising? Here's how you can control this hazard. Health Facil Manage. 1997 Dec;10(12):37–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thigpen J., Sexson W. R. Mercury toxicity awareness in the nursery. J Perinatol. 1997 Mar-Apr;17(2):140–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES