Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Jun;110(6):563–569. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110563

Economic gains resulting from the reduction in children's exposure to lead in the United States.

Scott D Grosse 1, Thomas D Matte 1, Joel Schwartz 1, Richard J Jackson 1
PMCID: PMC1240871  PMID: 12055046

Abstract

In this study we quantify economic benefits from projected improvements in worker productivity resulting from the reduction in children's exposure to lead in the United States since 1976. We calculated the decline in blood lead levels (BLLs) from 1976 to 1999 on the basis of nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data collected during 1976 through 1980, 1991 through 1994, and 1999. The decline in mean BLL in 1- to 5-year-old U.S. children from 1976-1980 to 1991-1994 was 12.3 microg/dL, and the estimated decline from 1976 to 1999 was 15.1 microg/dL. We assumed the change in cognitive ability resulting from declines in BLLs, on the basis of published meta-analyses, to be between 0.185 and 0.323 IQ points for each 1 g/dL blood lead concentration. These calculations imply that, because of falling BLLs, U.S. preschool-aged children in the late 1990s had IQs that were, on average, 2.2-4.7 points higher than they would have been if they had the blood lead distribution observed among U.S. preschool-aged children in the late 1970s. We estimated that each IQ point raises worker productivity 1.76-2.38%. With discounted lifetime earnings of $723,300 for each 2-year-old in 2000 dollars, the estimated economic benefit for each year's cohort of 3.8 million 2-year-old children ranges from $110 billion to $319 billion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (516.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Annest J. L., Pirkle J. L., Makuc D., Neese J. W., Bayse D. D., Kovar M. G. Chronological trend in blood lead levels between 1976 and 1980. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jun 9;308(23):1373–1377. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198306093082301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellinger D. C. Interpreting the literature on lead and child development: the neglected role of the "experimental system". Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1995 May-Jun;17(3):201–212. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(94)00081-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellinger D. C., Stiles K. M., Needleman H. L. Low-level lead exposure, intelligence and academic achievement: a long-term follow-up study. Pediatrics. 1992 Dec;90(6):855–861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lanphear B. P., Dietrich K., Auinger P., Cox C. Cognitive deficits associated with blood lead concentrations <10 microg/dL in US children and adolescents. Public Health Rep. 2000 Nov-Dec;115(6):521–529. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.6.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Needleman H. L., Schell A., Bellinger D., Leviton A., Allred E. N. The long-term effects of exposure to low doses of lead in childhood. An 11-year follow-up report. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jan 11;322(2):83–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199001113220203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nevin R. How lead exposure relates to temporal changes in IQ, violent crime, and unwed pregnancy. Environ Res. 2000 May;83(1):1–22. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1999.4045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pirkle J. L., Brody D. J., Gunter E. W., Kramer R. A., Paschal D. C., Flegal K. M., Matte T. D. The decline in blood lead levels in the United States. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) JAMA. 1994 Jul 27;272(4):284–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pirkle J. L., Kaufmann R. B., Brody D. J., Hickman T., Gunter E. W., Paschal D. C. Exposure of the U.S. population to lead, 1991-1994. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Nov;106(11):745–750. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pocock S. J., Smith M., Baghurst P. Environmental lead and children's intelligence: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. BMJ. 1994 Nov 5;309(6963):1189–1197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6963.1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenzweig M. R., Evenson R. Fertility, schooling, and the economic contribution of children in rural India: an econometric analysis. Econometrica. 1977;45(5):1,065-79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Salkever D. S. Updated estimates of earnings benefits from reduced exposure of children to environmental lead. Environ Res. 1995 Jul;70(1):1–6. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1995.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schwartz J. Beyond LOEL's, p values, and vote counting: methods for looking at the shapes and strengths of associations. Neurotoxicology. 1993 Summer-Fall;14(2-3):237–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schwartz J. Low-level lead exposure and children's IQ: a meta-analysis and search for a threshold. Environ Res. 1994 Apr;65(1):42–55. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1994.1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schwartz J. Societal benefits of reducing lead exposure. Environ Res. 1994 Jul;66(1):105–124. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1994.1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Soong W. T., Chao K. Y., Jang C. S., Wang J. D. Long-term effect of increased lead absorption on intelligence of children. Arch Environ Health. 1999 Jul-Aug;54(4):297–301. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tong S., Baghurst P., McMichael A., Sawyer M., Mudge J. Lifetime exposure to environmental lead and children's intelligence at 11-13 years: the Port Pirie cohort study. BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1569–1575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wasserman G. A., Liu X., Lolacono N. J., Factor-Litvak P., Kline J. K., Popovac D., Morina N., Musabegovic A., Vrenezi N., Capuni-Paracka S. Lead exposure and intelligence in 7-year-old children: the Yugoslavia Prospective Study. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Sep;105(9):956–962. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES