Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Jul;110(7):703–714. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110703

Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001.

Paul J Lioy 1, Clifford P Weisel 1, James R Millette 1, Steven Eisenreich 1, Daniel Vallero 1, John Offenberg 1, Brian Buckley 1, Barbara Turpin 1, Mianhua Zhong 1, Mitchell D Cohen 1, Colette Prophete 1, Ill Yang 1, Robert Stiles 1, Glen Chee 1, Willie Johnson 1, Robert Porcja 1, Shahnaz Alimokhtari 1, Robert C Hale 1, Charles Weschler 1, Lung Chi Chen 1
PMCID: PMC1240917  PMID: 12117648

Abstract

The explosion and collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) was a catastrophic event that produced an aerosol plume impacting many workers, residents, and commuters during the first few days after 11 September 2001. Three bulk samples of the total settled dust and smoke were collected at weather-protected locations east of the WTC on 16 and 17 September 2001; these samples are representative of the generated material that settled immediately after the explosion and fire and the concurrent collapse of the two structures. We analyzed each sample, not differentiated by particle size, for inorganic and organic composition. In the inorganic analyses, we identified metals, radionuclides, ionic species, asbestos, and inorganic species. In the organic analyses, we identified polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, pesticides, phthalate esters, brominated diphenyl ethers, and other hydrocarbons. Each sample had a basic pH. Asbestos levels ranged from 0.8% to 3.0% of the mass, the PAHs were > 0.1% of the mass, and lead ranged from 101 to 625 microg/g. The content and distribution of material was indicative of a complex mixture of building debris and combustion products in the resulting plume. These three samples were composed primarily of construction materials, soot, paint (leaded and unleaded), and glass fibers (mineral wool and fiberglass). Levels of hydrocarbons indicated unburned or partially burned jet fuel, plastic, cellulose, and other materials that were ignited by the fire. In morphologic analyses we found that a majority of the mass was fibrous and composed of many types of fibers (e.g., mineral wool, fiberglass, asbestos, wood, paper, and cotton). The particles were separated into size classifications by gravimetric and aerodynamic methods. Material < 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter was 0.88-1.98% of the total mass. The largest mass concentrations were > 53 microm in diameter. The results obtained from these samples can be used to understand the contact and types of exposures to this unprecedented complex mixture experienced by the surviving residents, commuters, and rescue workers directly affected by the plume from 11 to 12 September and the evaluations of any acute or long-term health effects from resuspendable dust and smoke to the residents, commuters, and local workers, as well as from the materials released after 11 September until the fires were extinguished. Further, these results support the need to have the interior of residences, buildings, and their respective HVAC systems professionally cleaned to reduce long-term residential risks before rehabitation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Claudio L. Environmental aftermath. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Nov;109(11):A528–A536. doi: 10.1289/ehp.109-a528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hale R. C., La Guardia M. J., Harvey E. P., Gaylor M. O., Mainor T. M., Duff W. H. Flame retardants. Persistent pollutants in land-applied sludges. Nature. 2001 Jul 12;412(6843):140–141. doi: 10.1038/35084130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hale R. C., La Guardia M. J., Harvey E. P., Mainor T. M., Duff W. H., Gaylor M. O. Polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants in Virginia freshwater fishes (USA). Environ Sci Technol. 2001 Dec 1;35(23):4585–4591. doi: 10.1021/es010845q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lioy P. J. Measurement methods for human exposure analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 (Suppl 3):35–43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lioy P. J., Yiin L. M., Adgate J., Weisel C., Rhoads G. G. The effectiveness of a home cleaning intervention strategy in reducing potential dust and lead exposures. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1998 Jan-Mar;8(1):17–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pellizzari E., Lioy P., Quackenboss J., Whitmore R., Clayton A., Freeman N., Waldman J., Thomas K., Rodes C., Wilcosky T. Population-based exposure measurements in EPA region 5: a phase I field study in support of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1995 Jul-Sep;5(3):327–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pleil J. D., Smith L. B., Zelnick S. D. Personal exposure to JP-8 jet fuel vapors and exhaust at air force bases. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):183–192. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES