Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2025 Aug 21;2025:10.17912/micropub.biology.001759. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001759

A Tetracycline-Inducible Promoter Replacement System for Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Samirul Bashir 1,§, Sasirekha Sivakumar 1, Nicholas Rhind 1
Reviewed by: Anonymous
PMCID: PMC12409486  PMID: 40918427

Abstract

Inducible promoters are essential tools for regulating gene expression. In fission yeast, various inducible promoter systems have been developed over the years, aiding gene function studies. A key challenge with existing promoters is their high expression in the “off ” state, with most systems showing only about a 10-fold difference between “on” and “off” conditions. A recent study introduced the PenotetS tetracycline promoter system, achieving nearly a 100-fold dynamic range. However, it was not designed to replace endogenous promoters. In this work, we have adapted the PenotetS system to enable the replacement of gene promoters directly at their endogenous genomic locations.


Figure 1. Tetracycline promoter cassette for replacing endogenous promoters in S. pombe .


Figure 1. Tetracycline promoter cassette for replacing endogenous promoters in
 S. pombe

(A) A graphical representation of the tetracycline promoter construct. It includes an antibiotic-resistant cassette, either KanMX, HphMX, or NatMX, tetracycline repressor (TetR) driven by CMV promoter, a tetracycline promoter denoted by either PenotetS or PenotetSW1-SW4 with the mECitrine fluorescent protein driven by the tetracycline promoter. (B) Wild-type (yFS110), SW2::wee1 (yFS1161), and SW4::wee1 (yFS1162) cells were grown in either DMSO only or 2.5 µg/ml ahTet overnight. (C) The length at septation and percent septation of cells shown in Figure 1B.

Description

Controlling gene expression is essential for studying its regulation and functions. Promoters are among the most commonly used tools for this purpose. These include constitutive and inducible promoters (Russell and Hall, 1983; Russell and Nurse, 1986; Hoffman and Winston, 1989; Maundrell, 1990; Matsuyama et al., 2008; Ohira et al., 2017). A challenge with inducible promoters is their tendency for leaky expression in the “off” state, which can complicate the interpretation of specific phenotypes (Bøe et al., 2008).

In Schizosaccharomyces pombe , the most commonly used promoters are the nmt promoters, which are induced by the removal of thiamine (Maundrell, 1990; Maundrell, 1993). There are three different nmt promoters with varying strengths: nmt1 , the strongest, nmt41 , of intermediate strength, and nmt81 , the weakest (Forsburg, 1993; Basi et al., 1993). A significant issue with nmt promoters is that they have a low dynamic range, inducing only about 10-fold above the repressed level of expression. There is considerable expression from these promoters even when repressed in the presence of thiamine, making them less suitable for specific experiments. Other promoters, such as ZEV have also been used to control the expression of genes in S. pombe . The advantage of the ZEV promoter is its titratable induction in the presence of different concentrations of beta-estradiol, with rapid induction (Ohira et al., 2017). However, ZEV also exhibits low dynamic range, comparable to the nmt promoters.

To address this issue, researchers have developed tetracycline-inducible promoters that exhibit tighter repression and, therefore, a greater dynamic range, approaching 100-fold (Faryar and Gatz, 1992; Erler et al., 2006; Zilio et al., 2012; Patterson et al., 2019). However, these tetracycline promoters do not achieve the high expression levels seen with the nmt1 promoter. Another limitation of these earlier tetracycline promoters is that they require at least two different elements for the expression control: the promoter and the tetracycline repressor, which need to be transformed separately into yeast cells. To overcome these drawbacks, Lyu et al. modified the tetracycline promoter to create PenotetS , a system of five different promoters with different expression levels (Lyu et al., 2024).

Additionally, they developed a system in which both the promoter and tetracycline repressor are integrated on a single plasmid and are co-expressed. They used the fission yeast promoter eno101 and built upon it by replacing the 19-bp sequence between the TATA box and TSS with the tetO sequence to create the enotetS promoter. They further developed four weaker derivatives of PenotetS by introducing GC-rich stem loops at the end of the 5' UTR. These promoters were named PenotetSW1-SW4 (Lyu et al., 2024).

The expression level of the full strength PenotetS in the ‘on' state is similar to that of the adh1 and nmt1 promoters. In the 'off' state, the expression of PenotetS is 10-fold lower than that of nmt1 , making it helpful in studying promoter shutoff phenotypes. Likewise, PenotetSW2 's expression resembles that of the nmt41 promoter but with a much lower off-state expression. These promoters span a broad expression range: SW2 's level is tenfold lower than PenotetS , and SW4 's is one hundredfold lower. An additional benefit of PenotetS promoters over nmt promoters is faster induction. Whereas nmt promoters need about 16 hours of thiamine withdrawal to activate, PenotetS is activated quickly upon the addition of the inducer anhydrotetracycline (ahTet) and the expressed protein can reach significant levels within a hour (Lyu et al., 2024).

Given these advantages, these promoters help provide a range of expression levels to study various genes and their functions. However, the promoters developed by Lyu et al. are designed for studying genes expressed from ectopic loci. They are not suitable for studying endogenous genes at their genomic loci. To address this limitation, we developed plasmids that enable the replacement of endogenous promoters with PenotetS promoters.

We started by amplifying the PenotetS promoter cassettes, including the tetracycline repressor, tetracycline promoter, and mECitrine fluorescent tag. These sequences were integrated into three different drug-resistant cassettes (KanMX, HphMX, and NatMX). A total of 15 plasmids were constructed, comprising five different tetracycline promoters and three different drug-resistance cassettes. This collection allows the control of multiple genes with tetracycline promoters in a single yeast strain, providing flexibility through the use of different drug-resistance cassettes. Additionally, the constructs include an N-terminal mECitrine fluorescent tag. Using a single primer pair, one can replace a gene's endogenous promoter with any of the five Penotet promoters when inclusion of the mECitrine tag is desired. However, if the tag is not included, each Penotet promoter must be amplified using a distinct primer ( Figure 1A ).

To test the efficacy of these cassettes for promoter swapping, we selected the wee1 gene, whose expression levels are reflected in cell length. Wee1 is an inhibitor of G2/M transition, and with increasing levels of Wee1 , cells grow longer in G2 (Russell and Nurse, 1987; Den Haese et al., 1995; Sveiczer et al., 2000; Keifenheim et al., 2017). This phenotype can be easily monitored by measuring the size, removing the need for fluorescent microscopy to assess protein expression. In the current study, we used PenotetSW2 and SW4 to replace the wee1 promoter. When cells were grown in YES supplemented with 2.5µg/mL ahTet, a significant increase in cell length was observed compared to growth in the absence of ahTet ( Figure 1B ). Cell length at septation was measured under both conditions. In the case of the PenotetSW2 :: wee1 strain, cell lengths increased from 9.2±1.5 µm to 47 ±7.4 µm upon the addition of ahTet. Similarly, for the PenotetSW4 :: wee1 strain, cell length increased from 8±2.1 µm to 36±4.8 µm ( Figure 1C ). The results indicate variable levels of cell size increase, which correlate with the different promoter expression strengths. Under promoter shutoff conditions (in the absence of ahTet), both PenotetSW2:: wee1 and PenoteSW4:: wee1 showed tight repression, as evidenced by reduced Wee1 expression, which is reflected in significantly smaller cell lengths compared to the wild type. The length at septation for PenotetSW4:: wee1 cells in the absence of ahTet closely resembled that of a wee1 null mutant, where cell length at division is 7.6 µm (Russell and Nurse, 1987). These findings demonstrate that the dynamic range of tetracycline promoter cassettes is a powerful tool for studying promoter shutoff phenotypes of a desired gene.

Methods

S. pombe Strains and Maintenance

S. pombe strains were created using standard methods (Forsburg and Rhind, 2006) and grown in YES at 30°C. Anhydrotetracycline hydrochloride (J66688.MB, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was dissolved at a concentration of 5 mg/ml in DMSO, stored at -80°C and used at a concentration of 2.5 µg/ml.

Plasmid Construction

All plasmids were constructed by the Gibson Assembly method using the Gibson Assembly master mix (E2611S, NEB). The original tetracycline promoter plasmids pDB5318 ( PenotetS ,), pDB5319 ( PenotetSW1 ), pDB5320 ( PenotetSW2 ), pDB5321 ( PenotetSW3 ), and pDB5322 ( PenotetSW4 ) were procured from Addgene (https://addgene.com). PCR was performed with oligos SB239 (5'TGGCGAATGG GATGGCGGCGTTAGTATC3') and SB242 (5'AAAGATCTTACAGTTTAAACGAGCTCGAATTC3') to amplify plasmids comprising drug-resistant cassette KanMX (pFA6a-kanMX6), HphMX (pCR2.1-hph) or NatMX (pCR2.1-nat). To amplify tetracycline promoters, including tetracycline repressor and mECitrine sequences, PCR was done with oligos SB240 (5' CGCCGCCATCCCATTCGCCATTCAGGCTG3') and SB243 (5'GTTTAAACTGTAAGATCTTTTGTATAGTTCATCCATGC3'). A single oligo pair was used to amplify all tetracycline promoters (including mECitrine and tet repressor), which were cloned downstream of the KanMX, HphMX, and NatMX cassettes. These plasmids were named as listed in Table 1. All plasmids generated in this study were sequenced by Plasmidsaurus ( https://plasmidsaurus.com/ ). Plasmids created in this study will be available from Addgene (https://addgene.com) and NRBP (https://yeast.nig.ac.jp/yeast/fy/StrainAllItemsList.jsf).

Strain Construction

To construct wee1 promoter replacement strains, yFS110 was transformed with the following PCR products: for the PenotetSW2 promoter swap, PCR was performed on pFS558 with oligos MO600 (5'GCATTCCAATTCAATTTAATTAAATCAAAAATTTCA TATCTATTTTTTTGTT AAATTGCCACATTTTCCATACAGAAAA cgacatggaggcccagaa 3') and MO603 (5'GCACGATTTAGATTCATGGAGCGTTGG GACCGCCGTAAGCCATAAG ATCTATGACTGCTGGTATTAGAAGAAGAG ctcatgctagcggcccgag cggccc 3'), and for PenotetSW4 , PCR was performed on pFS560 with oligos MO600 and MO602 (5'GCACGATTTAGATTCATGGAGCGTTGGGACCGCCGTAAGCCATAAGATCTATGACT GCTGGTATTAGAAGAAGAGCTCA tcatgctagccgggcccgagc 3'). Oligo regions that bind to the plasmid are shown in lowercase italics, while regions that target the wee1 genomic sequence are shown in uppercase. PCR products were transformed using electroporation (Torres-Garcia et al., 2020). Transformants were selected on YES Hygromycin (50mg/ml). Strains created in this study will be available from NRBP ( https://yeast.nig.ac.jp/yeast/fy/StrainAllItemsList.jsf ).

Reagents

Strain Name

Genotype

Reference

yFS110

h- leu1-32 ura4-D18 ade6-216 his7-366

lab stock

yFS1161

h- leu1-32 ura4-D18 ade6-216 his7-366 PenotetSW2: Wee1 ::HPHMX

this paper

yFS1162

h- leu1-32 ura4-D18 ade6-216 his7-366 PenotetSW4: Wee1 ::HPHMX

this paper

Plasmid Name

Description

Reference

pFA6a-kanMX6

KanMX drug cassette

(Bähler et al., 1998)

pCR2.1-hph

HphMX drug cassette

(Sato et al., 2005)

pCR2.1-nat

NatMX drug cassette

(Sato et al., 2005)

pDB5318

PenotetS promoter

(Lyu et al., 2024)

pDB5319

PenotetSW1 promoter

(Lyu et al., 2024)

pDB5320

PenotetSW2 promoter

(Lyu et al., 2024)

pDB5321

PenotetSW3 promoter

(Lyu et al., 2024)

pDB5322

PenotetSW4 promoter

(Lyu et al., 2024)

pFS551

KanMX PenotetS promoter cassette

this paper

pFS552

KanMX PenotetSW1 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS553

KanMX PenotetSW2 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS554

KanMX PenotetSW3 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS555

KanMX PenotetSW4 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS556

HphMX PenotetS promoter cassette

this paper

pFS557

HphMX PenotetSW1 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS558

HphMX PenotetSW2 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS559

HphMX PenotetSW3 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS560

HphMX PenotetSW4 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS561

NatMX PenotetS promoter cassette

this paper

pFS562

NatMX PenotetSW1 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS563

NatMX PenotetSW2 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS564

NatMX PenotetSW3 promoter cassette

this paper

pFS565

NatMX PenotetSW4 promoter cassette

this paper

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Makoto Ohira for designing the wee1 promoter oligos and Wendy Kam for critical reading of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by NIH GMR35148359 to NR.

References

  1. Bähler J, Wu JQ, Longtine MS, Shah NG, McKenzie A 3rd, Steever AB, Wach A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 1998 Jul 1;14(10):943–951. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<943::AID-YEA292>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basi G, Schmid E, Maundrell K. TATA box mutations in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nmt1 promoter affect transcription efficiency but not the transcription start point or thiamine repressibility. Gene. 1993 Jan 15;123(1):131–136. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90552-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bøe CA, Garcia I, Pai CC, Sharom JR, Skjølberg HC, Boye E, Kearsey S, Macneill SA, Tyers MD, Grallert B. Rapid regulation of protein activity in fission yeast. BMC Cell Biol. 2008 May 5;9:23–23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-9-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Den Haese GJ, Walworth N, Carr AM, Gould KL. The Wee1 protein kinase regulates T14 phosphorylation of fission yeast Cdc2. Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Apr 1;6(4):371–385. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.4.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Erler A, Maresca M, Fu J, Stewart AF. Recombineering reagents for improved inducible expression and selection marker re-use in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 2006 Aug 1;23(11):813–823. doi: 10.1002/yea.1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Faryar K, Gatz C. Construction of a tetracycline-inducible promoter in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Genet. 1992 Apr 1;21(4-5):345–349. doi: 10.1007/BF00351693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forsburg SL. Comparison of Schizosaccharomyces pombe expression systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jun 25;21(12):2955–2956. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.12.2955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Forsburg SL, Rhind N. Basic methods for fission yeast. Yeast. 2006 Feb 1;23(3):173–183. doi: 10.1002/yea.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keifenheim D, Sun XM, D'Souza E, Ohira MJ, Magner M, Mayhew MB, Marguerat S, Rhind N. Size-Dependent Expression of the Mitotic Activator Cdc25 Suggests a Mechanism of Size Control in Fission Yeast. Curr Biol. 2017 May 4;27(10):1491–1497.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyu XH, Yang YS, Pan ZQ, Ning SK, Suo F, Du LL. An improved tetracycline-inducible expression system for fission yeast. J Cell Sci. 2024 Nov 1;137(21) doi: 10.1242/jcs.263404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matsuyama A, Shirai A, Yoshida M. A series of promoters for constitutive expression of heterologous genes in fission yeast. Yeast. 2008 May 1;25(5):371–376. doi: 10.1002/yea.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maundrell K. nmt1 of fission yeast. A highly transcribed gene completely repressed by thiamine. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jul 5;265(19):10857–10864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maundrell K. Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene. 1993 Jan 15;123(1):127–130. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90551-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohira MJ, Hendrickson DG, Scott McIsaac R, Rhind N. An estradiol-inducible promoter enables fast, graduated control of gene expression in fission yeast. Yeast. 2017 Jun 8;34(8):323–334. doi: 10.1002/yea.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Patterson JO, Rees P, Nurse P. Noisy Cell-Size-Correlated Expression of Cyclin B Drives Probabilistic Cell-Size Homeostasis in Fission Yeast. Curr Biol. 2019 Apr 4;29(8):1379–1386.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Russell P, Nurse P. cdc25+ functions as an inducer in the mitotic control of fission yeast. Cell. 1986 Apr 11;45(1):145–153. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90546-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Russell P, Nurse P. Negative regulation of mitosis by wee1+, a gene encoding a protein kinase homolog. Cell. 1987 May 22;49(4):559–567. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90458-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Russell PR, Hall BD. The primary structure of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem. 1983 Jan 10;258(1):143–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sato M, Dhut S, Toda T. New drug-resistant cassettes for gene disruption and epitope tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 2005 May 1;22(7):583–591. doi: 10.1002/yea.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 1;9(7):671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sveiczer A, Csikasz-Nagy A, Gyorffy B, Tyson JJ, Novak B. Modeling the fission yeast cell cycle: quantized cycle times in wee1- cdc25Delta mutant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 5;97(14):7865–7870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Torres-Garcia S, Di Pompeo L, Eivers L, Gaborieau B, White SA, Pidoux AL, Kanigowska P, Yaseen I, Cai Y, Allshire RC. SpEDIT: A fast and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 method for fission yeast. Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Nov 24;5:274–274. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16405.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zilio N, Wehrkamp-Richter S, Boddy MN. A new versatile system for rapid control of gene expression in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 2012 Sep 12;29(10):425–434. doi: 10.1002/yea.2920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES