Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Oct;110(10):A619–A624. doi: 10.1289/ehp.021100619

Diarrheal diseases in children from a water reclamation site in Mexico city.

Enrique Cifuentes 1, Leticia Suárez 1, Maritsa Solano 1, René Santos 1
PMCID: PMC1241048  PMID: 12361943

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the risk of enteric diseases among children living in a water reclamation area in Mexico City. A geographic information system was used to define eligible wells and surrounding homesteads. Sixty-five water samples from five wells were tested for fecal coliform bacteria per 100 mL (FC/100 mL) during visits to 750 eligible households; caretakers only in those dwellings with children under 5 years old were interviewed throughout repeated cross-sectional surveys, conducted during 1999-2000. Data on diarrheal diseases were obtained from 761 children during the rainy season and 732 children during the dry season; their guardians also provided information on drinking water supply, sanitation, and socioeconomic variables. The presence of indicator organisms in groundwater samples pointed to fecal pollution; bacterial indicators, however, did not predict the health risk. The rates of diarrhea were 10.7% in the dry season and 11.8% in the rainy season. Children 1 year old showed the highest rate of diarrhea during the dry season [odds ratio (OR) = 2.1 with 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.99-4.71], particularly those from households perceiving unpleasant taste of tap water (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.97-2.92) and consuming vegetables washed only with water (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.10-4.39). Lower risk was observed in individuals enjoying full-day water supply (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.27-0.86) and a flushing toilet (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.16-0.67), as well as those storing water in covered receptacles (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.15-0.80). Rainy season data suggested that children from households perceiving a color to their water had a higher rate of diarrhea than did those without such complaint (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.93-3.67); recent consumption of food sold by street vendors was also a significant risk factor (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.98-2.87). Groundwater is at risk of contamination, as indicated by the presence of FC/100 mL. The endemic pattern of diarrhea, however, reflects mostly inadequate housing, sanitation, and water-related practices. Health protection policy must be discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bern C., Martines J., de Zoysa I., Glass R. I. The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: a ten-year update. Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70(6):705–714. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blum D., Feachem R. G. Measuring the impact of water supply and sanitation investments on diarrhoeal diseases: problems of methodology. Int J Epidemiol. 1983 Sep;12(3):357–365. doi: 10.1093/ije/12.3.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cifuentes E., Blumenthal U., Ruiz-Palacios G., Bennett S., Quigley M. Health risk in agricultural villages practicing wastewater irrigation in central Mexico: perspectives for protection. Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg. 2000;105:249–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cifuentes E., Hernández J. E., Venczel L., Hurtado M. Panorama of acute diarrhoeal diseases in Mexico. Health Place. 1999 Sep;5(3):247–255. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8292(99)00013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cifuentes Enrique, Mazari-Hiriart Marisa, Carneiro Fernando, Bianchi Flavia, Gonzalez Dolores. The risk of enteric diseases in young children and environmental indicators in sentinel areas of Mexico City. Int J Environ Health Res. 2002 Mar;12(1):53–62. doi: 10.1080/09603120120110059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edberg S. C., Allen M. J., Smith D. B., Kriz N. J. Enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from source water by the defined substrate technology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Feb;56(2):366–369. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.2.366-369.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Esrey S. A. Water, waste, and well-being: a multicountry study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Mar 15;143(6):608–623. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ezcurra E., Mazari-hiriart M. Are megacities viable? A cautionary tale from Mexico City. Environment. 1996 Jan-Feb;38(1):6-15, 26-35. doi: 10.1080/00139157.1996.9930972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Okun D. A. The value of water supply and sanitation in development: an assessment. Am J Public Health. 1988 Nov;78(11):1463–1467. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.11.1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. VanDerslice J., Briscoe J. Environmental interventions in developing countries: interactions and their implications. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jan 15;141(2):135–144. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES