Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Apr;110(Suppl 2):155–159. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2155

Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences.

Liam R O'Fallon 1, Allen Dearry 1
PMCID: PMC1241159  PMID: 11929724

Abstract

The past two decades have witnessed a rapid proliferation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects. CBPR methodology presents an alternative to traditional population-based biomedical research practices by encouraging active and equal partnerships between community members and academic investigators. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), the premier biomedical research facility for environmental health, is a leader in promoting the use of CBPR in instances where community-university partnerships serve to advance our understanding of environmentally related disease. In this article, the authors highlight six key principles of CBPR and describe how these principles are met within specific NIEHS-supported research investigations. These projects demonstrate that community-based participatory research can be an effective tool to enhance our knowledge of the causes and mechanisms of disorders having an environmental etiology, reduce adverse health outcomes through innovative intervention strategies and policy change, and address the environmental health concerns of community residents.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (547.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldana S. G. Financial impact of health promotion programs: a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2001 May-Jun;15(5):296–320. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcury T. A., Austin C. K., Quandt S. A., Saavedra R. Enhancing community participation in intervention research: farmworkers and agricultural chemicals in North Carolina. Health Educ Behav. 1999 Aug;26(4):563–578. doi: 10.1177/109019819902600412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arcury T. A., Quandt S. A., Austin C. K., Preisser J., Cabrera L. F. Implementation of EPA's Worker Protection Standard training for agricultural laborers: an evaluation using North Carolina data. Public Health Rep. 1999 Sep-Oct;114(5):459–468. doi: 10.1093/phr/114.5.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cicero-Fernandez P., Torres V., Rosales A., Cesar H., Dorland K., Muñoz R., Uribe R., Martinez A. P. Evaluation of human exposure to ambient PM10 in the metropolitan area of Mexico City using a GIS-based methodology. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Nov;51(11):1586–1593. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dearry A. D., Collman G. W., Saint C., Fields N., Redd S. Building a network of research in children's environmental health. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107 (Suppl 3):391–392. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s3391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisinger A., Senturia K. Doing community-driven research: a description of Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities. J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):519–534. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Firshein J. Preventive health programs found to be cost-effective. Hospitals. 1985 Sep 16;59(18):37–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fleming C. A., Balaguera H. U., Craven D. E. Risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia. Focus on prophylaxis. Med Clin North Am. 2001 Nov;85(6):1545–1563. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70395-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Freudenberg N. Health promotion in the city: a review of current practice and future prospects in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:473–503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Green L. W. Health education's contributions to public health in the twentieth century: a glimpse through health promotion's rear-view mirror. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:67–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris A. Economics, competition and the regulation of public health risks. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(1):41–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris J. S. The cost effectiveness of health promotion programs. J Occup Med. 1991 Mar;33(3):327–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Israel B. A., Schulz A. J., Parker E. A., Becker A. B. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kinney P. L., Aggarwal M., Northridge M. E., Janssen N. A., Shepard P. Airborne concentrations of PM(2.5) and diesel exhaust particles on Harlem sidewalks: a community-based pilot study. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):213–218. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Knobel R. J. Health promotion and disease prevention: improving health while conserving resources. Fam Community Health. 1983 Feb;5(4):16–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Max W. The financial impact of smoking on health-related costs: a review of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2001 May-Jun;15(5):321–331. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Northridge M. E., Yankura J., Kinney P. L., Santella R. M., Shepard P., Riojas Y., Aggarwal M., Strickland P. Diesel exhaust exposure among adolescents in Harlem: a community-driven study. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):998–1002. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. O'Fallon L. R., Collman G. W., Dearry A. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences' research program on children's environmental health. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;10(6 Pt 2):630–637. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pelletier K. R. A review and analysis of the health and cost-effective outcome studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention programs at the worksite: 1993-1995 update. Am J Health Promot. 1996 May-Jun;10(5):380–388. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.5.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wallerstein N. Power between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jul;49(1):39–53. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00073-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wing S., Wolf S. Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):233–238. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES