Abstract
Gut microbiota and microbial components are known to regulate bone metabolism. Peptidoglycan, a key bacterial cell wall component, is recognized by NOD1 and NOD2. Muramyl dipeptide (MDP), a ligand for NOD2 found in most bacteria, increases bone mass by promoting bone formation via Runx2 and β-catenin. However, the effects of NOD1 ligands, such as l-Ala-γ-d-glu-meso-diaminopimelic acid (TriDAP) from Gram-negative bacteria, remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that, unlike MDP, TriDAP elicits bone resorption by decreasing osteoblast and Runx2 levels and increasing osteoclasts in the distal femurs of mice intraperitoneally administered TriDAP. This treatment inhibited osteoblast differentiation by downregulating Runx2 expression and also decreased the protein stability of Runx2 by increasing its ubiquitination. TriDAP, but not MDP, reduced the expression of IκB and increased NF-κB transcriptional activity in osteoblasts. The inhibition of osteoblast differentiation by TriDAP occurred through NF-κB activation and NOD1 recognition. TriDAP exhibited a marginal increase in osteoclast differentiation in the presence of RANKL, but it enhanced osteoclast differentiation in an osteoblast–osteoclast co-culture system. This suggests that TriDAP directly affects osteoblasts and indirectly affects osteoclasts. TriDAP did not induce osteoclast differentiation in the presence of NOD1-deficient osteoblasts. Other NOD1 ligands, C12-iE-DAP and C14-Tri-LAN-Gly, also inhibited osteoblastogenesis and promoted osteoclastogenesis, similar to TriDAP. Bacillus cereus peptidoglycan preferentially stimulates NOD1 but not NOD2, leading to increased bone resorption. In conclusion, activation of NOD1 in osteoblasts plays a role in regulating bone homeostasis by enhancing bone resorption.
Subject terms: Bone, Differentiation, Central control of bone remodelling
NOD1 activation disrupts bone formation and increases resorption
Bone health relies on the balance between bone formation and resorption by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively. This study explores how TriDAP, often found as a part of peptidoglycan in the cell wall of bacteria, affects bone metabolism through a receptor called NOD1. Researchers used mice to study the effects of TriDAP, a NOD1 ligand, on bone health. They found that TriDAP reduced bone volume by inhibiting new bone formation and increasing bone resorption. This was linked to decreased activity of Runx2, a protein crucial for osteoblast function, and increased activity of NF-κB, a protein involved in inflammation. In conclusion, TriDAP-activated NOD1 inhibits osteoblasts while promoting osteoclasts, resulting in bone loss. This suggests that targeting NOD1 could be a potential strategy for treating bone diseases.
This summary was initially drafted using artificial intelligence, then revised and fact-checked by the author.
Introduction
Bone undergoes continuous remodeling to maintain health, with tightly regulated processes of resorption and formation1,2. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts are responsible for bone resorption and bone formation, respectively. Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells (MNCs) that originate from a hematopoietic lineage. Osteoclastogenesis is differentiated by macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL)1,3. RANKL binding to RANK triggers the differentiation of osteoclast precursors into tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive multinucleated osteoclasts1. Osteoblasts originate from mesenchymal stem cells and are regulated through multiple signaling pathways that involve transforming growth factor β, bone morphogenic protein, fibroblast growth factor and Wnt/β-catenin4. Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) is essential for osteoblast differentiation because it induces osteogenic genes such as ALP, osteocalcin and bone sialoprotein5.
Recent research has shown that gut microbiota can influence bone metabolism6. The surface molecules of bacteria, known as microbe-associated molecular patterns, are recognized by pattern recognition receptors. This recognition leads to the induction of host immune responses7. Microbe-associated molecular pattern–pattern recognition receptor interactions are a central aspect of host immune activation in response to microbes. Peptidoglycan (PGN) is a major component of the cell wall in most bacteria8. The dry weight of Gram-positive bacteria is approximately 90%, whereas that of Gram-negative bacteria is about 10%9. PGN is a large polymeric molecule consisting of linear glycan chains composed of two amino sugars, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid. The short peptide, consisting of three to five amino acids, binds to GlcNAc8. Gram-positive bacteria predominantly possess lysine-type PGN, whereas Gram-negative bacteria are characterized by diaminopimelic acid (DAP)-type PGN10. In mammals, polymeric PGN is digested by human PGN recognition protein-2, lysozymes and N-acetyl-d-glucosaminidase11,12, with the predominant PGN fragment being N-acetylmuramic acid tripeptide13. PGN fragments derived from intestinal microbiota have been identified in the bone marrow14.
The cytosolic receptors nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) 1 and NOD2 recognize distinct bacterial PGN-derived motifs, γ-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic acid (iE-DAP) and muramyl dipeptide (MDP), respectively. Their activation elicits pro-inflammatory responses through nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling, which can contribute to the onset and progression of inflammatory diseases15. However, NOD1 and NOD2 signaling have been reported to trigger opposing host immune responses. For instance, the NOD1 ligand, but not the NOD2 ligand, induces pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the adipose tissue of patients with gestational diabetes16. Meanwhile, PGN derived from Lactobacillus salivarius Ls33 and M-Tri-Lys, another NOD2 ligand, shows an anti-inflammatory capacity in a murine trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid colitis model17. We previously reported that MDP, a representative NOD2 ligand, induces new bone formation18 and alleviates the osteoporosis caused by estrogen-deficiency19. MDP enhances osteoblast activity by activating Runx2 and the canonical Wnt–β-catenin pathway via Wnt3a induction19. In addition, it decreases osteoclast activity by downregulating the RANKL/osteoprotegerin (OPG) ratio18,19. As NOD1 and NOD2 activations induce distinct immune responses, they could differentially regulate bone metabolism. While the role of NOD2 signaling in promoting bone mass has been well established, the involvement of NOD1 signaling in bone metabolism remains poorly characterized. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effects of NOD1 activation on bone metabolism using a representative NOD1 ligand, l-Ala-γ-d-glu-meso-DAP (TriDAP), and NOD1-activating PGN.
Materials and methods
Materials
TriDAP, C12-iE-DAP, C14-Tri-LAN-Gly, MDP and Pam3CSK4 were obtained from InvivoGen. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Gibco. α-Minimum Essential Medium (α-MEM), ascorbic acid–free α-MEM and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) were purchased from Welgene. Trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and penicillin–streptomycin were purchased from Hyclone. Murine soluble RANKL and mouse M-CSF were obtained from R&D Systems and PeproTech, respectively. 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 was purchased from EMD Millipore. Ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate, N-p-tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK), cycloheximide (CHX) and mutanolysine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Inc. An alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining kit and alizarin red S solution were purchased from EMD Millipore. A TRAP staining kit was purchased from Cosmo Bio Co. Primary antibodies specific to p65, IκBα and p-NF-κB were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies to Myc epitope tag and hemaglutinin (HA) epitope tag were purchased from Abcam and InvivoGen, respectively. The antibody to β-actin was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Goat anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and goat-anti-mouse IgG-HRP were purchased from Southern Biotech. Tryptic soy broth and de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe medium were purchased from BD Biosciences.
Purification of Bacillus cereus PGN (Bc.PGN)
B. cereus KCTC 13153 was obtained from the Korean Collection for Type Culture. B. cereus was grown at 37 °C to the mid-log phase in aerobic conditions. The bacterial pellet was collected by centrifugation, washed with PBS three times and stored at -80 °C until use. PGN was isolated as previously described with minor modifications20. Soluble PGN was prepared by incubating 100 μg of insoluble PGN with 50 U of mutanolysin at 37 °C with shaking for 24 h. The enzyme was inactivated by incubation at 100 °C for 10 min.
Mice
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University (approval no. SNU-160524-3). Five-week-old C57BL/6 mice and 1-day-old neonatal mice were purchased from Orient Bio. NOD1-deficient mice were kindly provided by Professor Jong-Hwan Park (Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea).
Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)
Mice that had acclimated for 1 week were randomly divided into three groups and intraperitoneally administered 100 μl of 1.25 mg/kg TriDAP (n = 5), 100 μl of 1.25 mg/kg MDP (n = 5) or 100 μl of PBS on days 0 and 4. On day 7, the mice were euthanized, and their femurs were removed and fixed in 10% formalin. In a separate experiment, 6-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into two groups and treated with PBS or insoluble Bc.PGN (30 μg) via oral gavage three times per week for 4 weeks. Their femurs were scanned using micro-CT (Skyscan1275, Bruker-CT, Kontich, Belgium) and quantitatively analyzed as described previously18.
Histological analysis
The femurs were fixed and decalcified in 10% EDTA in PBS for 7 days at 4 °C. The decalcified femurs were paraffin embedded and sectioned and then subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or TRAP staining. Images were obtained using a BX-51 fluorescence microscope equipped with a DP72 camera (BX-51, Olympus). TRAP-positive areas were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
In vivo calcein double labeling
Mice were intraperitoneally treated with 20 mg/kg of calcein one day before the initial TriDAP administration and after the final TriDAP administration. TriDAP (1.25 mg/kg) or PBS was administered to the mice on days 1 and 5. On day 9 after the first calcein injection, the mice were euthanized, and their femurs were fixed and embedded in methyl methacrylate. The resin blocks were longitudinally sectioned, and the calcein-labeled bone tissue was examined using a BX-51 fluorescence microscope equipped with a DP72 camera (Olympus). The mineral apposition rate was measured using OsteoMeasure software (OsteoMetrics).
Osteoblast differentiation
Mouse osteoblast precursors were isolated from the calvaria of 1-day-old C57BL/6 mice, due to their incomplete ossification and the high abundance of osteoprogenitor cells, as previously described18,21. In brief, the calvariae were digested in α-MEM containing 1% penicillin–streptomycin, 0.1% collagenase (Wako) and 0.2% dispase (Roche) for 15 min at 37 °C with shaking. The digestion procedure was repeated five times, and the supernatant was collected in a single tube, except for the first collection. The cells (5 × 105) were plated onto a 100-mm dish and incubated for 3 days. In a separate experiment, MC3T3-E1 cells, a well-characterized murine osteoblast precursor cell line22, were used for various in vitro assays, including intracellular signaling and transfection with reporter genes.
Osteoclast differentiation
Bone marrow cells isolated from the femurs and tibiae of 5-week-old mice with fully developed bone marrow were incubated in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin in the presence of 5 ng/ml M-CSF for 1 day. Nonadherent cells were obtained and induced to differentiate into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) by incubation with 20 ng/ml M-CSF for 4 days. The BMMs were plated onto a 96-well culture plate at 2 × 104 cells/well and incubated with 20 ng/ml RANKL and 20 ng/ml M-CSF in the presence or absence of TriDAP, C12-iE-DAP, C14-Tri-LAN-Gly or soluble Bc.PGN. In co-culture experiments, BMMs (1 × 105) and calvarial osteoblast precursors (1 × 104 cells per well) plated onto a 48-well culture plate were incubated with 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 100 ng/ml 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the presence or absence of soluble Bc.PGN for 12 days. After that incubation, the cells were fixed and stained using a TRAP staining kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. We used an inverted phase-contrast microscope to enumerate TRAP-positive MNCs with three or more nuclei as osteoclasts.
Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted and subjected to RT-PCR or real-time RT-PCR as described previously23. The primer sequences were as follows: Alp: forward 5′-CCAACTCTTTTGTGCCAGAGA-3′ and reverse 5′-GGCTACATTGGTGTTGAGCTTTT-3′; Bone sialoprotein (Bsp) forward 5′-GAATGTGTGTCCTCTGAAG-3′ and reverse 5′-AATCCTCGCTCTCTGCATGG-3′; Runx2 forward 5′-AACGATCTGAGATTTGTGGGC-3′ and reverse 5′-CCT GCGTGGGATTTCTTGGTT-3′; Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) forward 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACCGGATTTG-3′ and reverse 5′-TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA-3′.
Western blotting
HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with the Myc-tagged Runx2 and/or Smurf1 expression constructs using Attractene transfection reagent (Qiagen) as recommended by the manufacturer. The transfected cells were treated with 40 μg/ml CHX in the presence or absence of 1 μg/ml TriDAP for 2, 4 or 8 h. In a separate experiment, primary calvarial osteoblasts were treated with 1 μg/ml TriDAP for 15, 30, 60 or 90 min. The cells were lysed and subjected to western blotting as previously described24. In a separate experiment to examine Runx2 ubiquitination, HEK293 cells were co-transfected with MYC-tagged Runx2 and HA-tagged ubiquitin. After 24 h, the cells were lysed, and proteins were immunoprecipitated as previously described24.
Immunofluorescence staining
MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml TriDAP for 15 min. The cells were fixed and sequentially stained with an antibody specific to p65 and Hoechst 33342, as previously described18.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The OPG and RANKL levels were measured using Quantikine ELISA kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Reporter gene assay
HEK293 cells (2 × 104 cells/0.2 ml), seeded onto a 96-well culture plate in DMEM, were incubated overnight. The cells were transfected with pNF-κB-Luc and pRL-TK Renilla luciferase plasmids (Promega), together with the plasmid encoding human NOD1 or NOD2, using LipofectamineTM2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen) for 3 h in serum-starved DMEM. After the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, the cells were incubated for a further 24 h and then stimulated with PGN for 16 h. The cells were lysed, and the firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were analyzed using a dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed at least three times. All quantitative results from in vivo studies and in vitro studies are expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean and mean values ± standard deviation, respectively. The statistical differences were determined using the unpaired t-test or one-way analysis of variance. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the control group at P < 0.05.
Results
TriDAP decreases bone volume by downregulating new bone formation
To examine the effects of TriDAP on bone metabolism, mice were intraperitoneally treated with TriDAP, MDP or PBS. Administration with TriDAP, in contrast to MDP, resulted in a significant reduction in trabecular bone volume, trabecular thickness and trabecular number compared with the control mice (Fig. 1a, b), although trabecular separation remained unchanged. Femur sections stained with H&E show the decreased trabecular bone in TriDAP-treated mice (Fig. 1c). To determine whether TriDAP affects new bone formation, we conducted a calcein labeling assay. As shown in Fig. 1d, the calcein double-labeling images indicate a reduction in the calcein-labeled mineralized surface of the distal femur in mice treated with TriDAP compared with control mice. The administration of TriDAP to mice resulted in a significant decrease in the mineral apposition rate, suggesting inhibition of bone formation (Fig. 1e, f). These results demonstrate that TriDAP inhibits bone mass by downregulating new bone formation.
Fig. 1. TriDAP but not MDP decreases bone mass.
Mice were intraperitoneally administered 1.25 mg/kg of TriDAP or MDP, or PBS, on days 0 and 4. a On day 7, micro-CT images were obtained of the distal femurs of those mice. b BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N and Tb.Sp. were analyzed using a CT analyzer. BV/TV, trabecular bone volume; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Sp., trabecular separation. c Distal femur sections from mice treated with PBS or TriDAP were stained with H&E and photographed with an inverted phase-contrast microscope. d Mice were intraperitoneally administered calcein one day before the first TriDAP administration and after the second TriDAP administration. Resin blocks of those femurs were sectioned. The images were obtained using a fluorescent microscope. e The distance between two labels represents the mineral apposition rate (MAR). Scale bars, 500 μm. f The MAR was quantified using OsteoMeasure. *P < 0.05.
TriDAP attenuates osteogenesis via downregulation of Runx2 activity
As shown in Fig. 1, we observed that TriDAP inhibits new bone formation. Therefore, we examined whether TriDAP inhibits osteoblast differentiation. Primary calvarial osteoblast precursors were differentiated in the presence or absence of TriDAP and then subjected to ALP staining. As expected, TriDAP inhibited osteoblast differentiation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2a). The expression of osteogenic marker genes such as Alp, Bsp and Runx2 was dose-dependently inhibited by TriDAP (Fig. 2b). Runx2 serves as a master transcription factor in osteoblast differentiation25, and TriDAP inhibited Runx2 transcriptional activity (Fig. 2c). We further examined whether TriDAP regulates Runx2 protein stability. The half-life of the Runx2 protein was decreased in cells treated with TriDAP (Fig. 2d, e). Runx2 undergoes degradation through a ubiquitin–proteasome-dependent pathway26. The degradation of Runx2 is mediated by Smurf1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase26. TriDAP increased the ubiquitination of Runx2 (Fig. 2f), and the Runx2 protein was more efficiently decreased by TriDAP in the presence of Smurf1 than in its absence (Fig. 2g). These results suggest that TriDAP inhibits osteoblast differentiation by downregulating Runx2 stability.
Fig. 2. TriDAP inhibits osteoblast differentiation by decreasing Runx2 activity.
a Calvarial osteoblast precursors were differentiated for 6 days with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, with or without TriDAP, and then subjected to ALP staining. b MC3T3-E1 cells were treated for 2 days with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, with or without TriDAP. The expression levels of Alp, Bsp, Runx2 and Gapdh were determined using RT-PCR. c MC3T3-E1 cells were transfected with 6× OSE-Luc plasmids. The cells were treated with 0, 0.1, 1 or 10 μg/ml TriDAP for 18 h, lysed and subjected to a luciferase assay. d HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with 3×Myc-Runx2; treated with CHX (40 µg/ml) in the presence of TriDAP (1 µg/ml) for 2, 4 or 8 h; and then lysed. The expression of Runx2 was determined by western blotting using a specific anti-Myc antibody. e The relative expression level of Runx2 was normalized to that of β-actin. f HEK293 cells were co-transfected with 3×Myc-Runx2 and HA-ubiquitin and then treated with TriDAP for 24 h. The cells were lysed, and immunoprecipitation was performed using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting with a anti-Myc antibody. g HEK293 cells were co-transfected with 3×Myc-Runx2 and Smurf1 expression vectors, treated with TriDAP for 24 h and lysed. The Runx2 level was determined by western blotting with a specific anti-Myc antibody. *P < 0.05.
TriDAP primarily induces osteoclastogenesis by upregulating the RANKL/OPG ratio
We subsequently examined whether the negative effect of TriDAP on bone metabolism is due to enhanced osteoclast activity. Figure 3a shows that the TRAP-positive surface area in femur sections subjected to TRAP staining was increased in TriDAP-treated mice compared with control mice, indicating that TriDAP increases osteoclast activity in vivo. Next, an in vitro osteoclast differentiation assay was performed to clarify the effect of TriDAP on osteoclast differentiation. In the absence of RANKL, TriDAP failed to induce osteoclast differentiation (Fig. 3b). In the presence of RANKL, the synthetic bacterial lipoprotein PAM3CSK4 significantly increased the number of TRAP-positive MNCs differentiated from RANKL-primed BMMs, whereas TriDAP alone produced only a modest increase (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 1). TriDAP, however, did produce an increase in TRAP-positive MNCs in the osteoblast–osteoclast co-culture system (Fig. 3c, d). TriDAP induced a decrease in OPG expression and an increase in RANKL expression, increasing the RANKL/OPG ratio (Fig. 3e–g). Our in vivo observations also showed an increased RANKL/OPG ratio (Fig. 3h). These results indicate that TriDAP predominantly enhances osteoclast differentiation by upregulating the RANKL/OPG ratio.
Fig. 3. TriDAP indirectly enhances osteoclast differentiation by increasing the RANKL/OPG ratio in osteoblasts.
a The femurs of mice treated with PBS or TriDAP were subjected to TRAP staining to determine osteoclast activity. Asterisks denote TRAP-positive osteoclasts on the bone surface. b BMMs were treated with RANKL and M-CSF for 3 days. The RANKL-primed cells were treated with M-CSF and TriDAP with or without additional RANKL for one day and then fixed and stained with TRAP. TRAP+ MNCs with three or more nuclei were enumerated using an inverted microscope. c, d BMMs were co-cultured with calvarial osteoblast precursors. The cells were differentiated with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate supplemented with 10 nM 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamine (OH)2D3 in the presence or absence of TriDAP. On day 6, the cells were fixed and stained with TRAP (c). TRAP-positive MNCs with three or more nuclei were enumerated using an inverted microscope (d). e–g On day 2, culture supernatants were collected to measure the expression of OPG (e) and RANKL (f) by ELISA and the RANKL/OPG ratio (g) is shown. h Mice were intraperitoneally treated with 1.25 mg/kg of TriDAP or PBS. After 18 h, bone marrow extracellular fluids were collected. The levels of OPG and RANKL were measured using ELISA. *P < 0.05.
NF-κB activation is important for TriDAP responsiveness
NF-κB activation is known to inhibit osteoblast differentiation27. Conversely, NOD1 receptor ligands induce the activation of NF-κB28. Thus, we examined NF-κB activation in osteoblasts treated with TriDAP, which decreased IκBα expression (Fig. 4a) but increased the expression and nuclear translocation of p65 (Fig. 4a, b). TriDAP increased NF-κB transcriptional activity in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4c). However, MDP did not affect IκBα expression or NF-κB transcriptional activity (Fig. 4d, e). These results indicate that, unlike MDP (a representative NOD2 ligand), TriDAP activates NF-κB in osteoblasts. When the cells were pretreated with TPCK, an NF-κB inhibitor, the inhibitory effect of TriDAP on Runx2 transcriptional activity was significanly reduced (Fig. 4f). These results suggest that NF-κB activation is critical for the inhibition of osteoblast differentiation by TriDAP.
Fig. 4. NF-κB activation is a critical factor in TriDAP-inhibited osteoblast differentiation.
a MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml TriDAP for 15, 30, 60 or 90 min. The cells were lysed and subjected to western blotting using specific antibodies to IκBα or p65. b MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml TriDAP for 15 min and then fixed and stained sequentially with specific antibodies to p65 and Hoechst 33342. Cell images were obtained using a confocal microscope. Scale bar, 20 μm. c, e MC3T3-E1 cells were transfected with an NF-κB-Luc plasmid and treated with 0, 0.1, 1 or 10 µg/ml TriDAP (c) or MDP (e) for 24 h. The cells were lysed and subjected to a luciferase assay. d MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml of MDP for 15, 30, 60 or 90 min. The cells were lysed and subjected to western blotting using specific antibodies to IκBα. f MC3T3-E1 cells were transfected with 6× OSE-Luc plasmids. The cells were pretreated with 10 μM TPCK for 1 h, followed by stimulation with 10 μg/ml TriDAP for an additional 23 h. The cells were lysed and subjected to a luciferase assay. *P < 0.05. n.s. not significant.
Nod1 is critical to TriDAP-induced bone resorption
TriDAP is recognized by NOD1 and then induces inflammatory responses through NF-κB activation29. Thus, we investigated whether NOD1 is required for TriDAP responsiveness using NOD1-knockout mice and NOD1-deficient osteoblasts. When NOD1-knockout mice were intraperitoneally treated with TriDAP, the structural trabecular bone parameters did not differ from those of PBS-treated NOD1-knockout mice (Fig. 5a). The TriDAP-decreased ALP staining and osteoblast mineralization were not observed in NOD1-deficient osteoblasts, suggesting that NOD1 plays an essential role in the inhibition of osteoblast differentiation caused by TriDAP (Fig. 5b, c). TriDAP did not lead to the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 nor did it decrease IκB expression in NOD1-deficient osteoblasts, indicating that NF-κB activation by TriDAP did not occur in those cells (Fig. 5d). Furthermore, in NOD1-deficient osteoblasts, TriDAP failed to induce the differentiation of both wild-type and NOD1-deficient macrophages into osteoclasts (Fig. 5e), suggesting that osteoblasts, not osteoclasts, are the target cells of TriDAP. Collectively, these results indicate that TriDAP recognition by NOD1 is essential for its effects on bone metabolism.
Fig. 5. NOD1 is essential for TriDAP effects on bone metabolism.
NOD1-deficient mice were intraperitoneally treated with 1.25 mg/kg of TriDAP or PBS on days 0 and 4. On day 7, the distal femurs were obtained from the mice. a Each femur was scanned by micro-CT, and the trabecular bone parameters were measured using Skyscan programs. Three-dimensional images of each femur were obtained using CT volume software. b BV/TV, Tb.N., Tb.Sp. and Tb.Th. were calculated using the CT analyzer. c Calvarial osteoblast precursors from wild-type (WT) or NOD1-deficent mice were differentiated for 10 days with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate with or without TriDAP. The cells were fixed and subjected to alizarin red S staining. d Calvarial osteoblast precursors from WT or NOD1-deficent mice were treated with 1 µg/ml TriDAP for 15 min and then lysed and subjected to western blotting using specific antibodies to p-IκBα or p65. e WT or NOD1-deficient BMMs were co-cultured with WT or NOD1-deficient calvarial osteoblast precursors. The cells were differentiated with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate supplemented with 10 nM 1α,25(OH)2D3 in the presence or absence of TriDAP. On day 6, the cells were fixed and stained with TRAP. TRAP-positive MNCs with three or more nuclei were enumerated using an inverted microscope.
Nod1 ligands inhibit osteogenesis and increase RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis
Next, we investigated whether the inhibition of osteogenesis and increase of osteoclastogenesis are general phenomena associated with NOD1 ligands. Alizarin red S staining showed that the NOD1 ligands C12-iE-DAP and C14-Tri-LAN-Gly effectively inhibit calcium deposition, suggesting the general attenuation of osteoblast differentiation by NOD1 ligands (Fig. 6a–c). NOD1 ligands also increased the number of TRAP-positive MNCs that differentiated from RANKL-primed BMMs in the presence of RANKL (Fig. 6d, e). Collectively, NOD1 ligands lead to the inhibition of osteogenesis and enhancement of osteoclastogenesis.
Fig. 6. NOD1 agonists inhibit osteoblast differentiation and increase osteoclast differentiation.
a–c Calvarial osteoblast precursors were treated with C12-iE-DAP or C14-Tri-LAN-Gly in the presence of 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate for 14 days. The cells were fixed and subjected to alizarin red S staining (a). Alizarin red S precipitates were dissolved and measured by a spectrophotometric analysis at 450 nm (b, c). d, e BMMs were treated with RANKL and M-CSF for 3 days. The RANKL-primed cells were treated with C12-iE-DAP (d) or C14-Tri-LAN-Gly (e) in the presence or absence of additional RANKL for 1 day. The cells were fixed and stained with TRAP. TRAP-positive MNCs with three or more nuclei were enumerated using an inverted microscope.
NOD1-activating Bc.PGN induces bone destruction
Given that NOD1 signaling activation induces bone destruction, we examined whether a PGN that preferentially stimulates NOD1 also induces bone destruction. Bc.PGN and TriDAP enhanced NF-κB transcriptional activity in NOD1-transfected cells, but they showed minimal effects in NOD2-transfected cells, indicating that Bc.PGN selectively activates NOD1 signaling (Fig. 7a). Bc.PGN-treated mice exhibited decreases in trabecular bone volume and trabecular bone number relative to control mice (Fig. 7b–d). However, trabecular separation and trabecular thickness were unchanged by Bc.PGN (data not shown). Femur sections from Bc.PGN-treated mice showed reduced bone area (Fig. 7e) and increased bone surface (Fig. 7f, g). Bc.PGN produced a dose-dependent increase in osteoclast differentiation in vitro (Fig. 7h), and it attenuated osteoblast differentiation (Fig. 7i). The expression of osteogenic marker genes, such as ALP and Runx2, was significantly decreased by Bc.PGN (Fig. 7j, k). In addition, Bc.PGN did not induce osteoclastogenesis in NOD1-deficient osteoblasts (Fig. 7l). Therefore, NOD1 activation by Bc.PGN increases bone resorption through the induction of osteoclast activity and the suppression of osteoblast activity.
Fig. 7. Bacillus cereus PGN preferentially stimulates NOD1 and increases bone resorption.
a HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid expressing human NOD1 or NOD2 in the presence of the firefly luciferase reporter plasmid regulated by an NF-κB transcription factor and the pRL-TK Renilla luciferase plasmid. The cells were incubated with or without soluble Bc.PGN or TriDAP at 10 μg/ml for 16 h; lysed; and measured for firefly or Renilla luciferase activity. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity. b–g Seven-week-old male mice (n = 5) received intragastric administrations of PBS or insoluble Bc.PGN (30 μg) three times weekly for 4 weeks. Their femurs were scanned by micro-CT, and trabecular bone parameters were measured using Skyscan. Three-dimensional images of the femurs were obtained using CT volume software (b). BV/TV (c) and Tb.N. (d) were calculated using the CT analyzer. Paraffin sections of the decalcified femurs were subjected to H&E and photographed (e). Scale bars, 200 μm. Paraffin sections of the decalcified femurs were subjected to TRAP staining and photographed (f). The Oc.S/BS ratio was measured using Osteomeasure software (g). Scale bars, 200 μm. Oc.S/BS, osteoclast surface per bone surface. h RANKL-primed BMMs were differentiated into osteoclasts with M-CSF in the presence of soluble Bc.PGN at 0, 0.1, 1 or 10 μg/ml for 2 days. The cells were then fixed and subjected to TRAP staining. TRAP-positive MNCs with three or more nuclei were enumerated. i Calvarial osteoblast precursors were differentiated into osteoblasts by incubation with β-glycerophosphate and ascorbic acid in the presence of soluble Bc.PGN at 0, 3 or 10 μg/ml for 12 days. The cells were then fixed and subjected to ALP staining. j, k Calvarial osteoblast precursors were stimulated with β-glycerophosphate and ascorbic acid in the presence or absence of soluble Bc.PGN (3 μg/ml) for 1 or 3 day(s). Total RNA was isolated, and the mRNA expression levels of ALP (j) and Runx2 (k) with GAPDH were determined by real-time RT-PCR. l Wild-type or NOD1-deficient RANKL-primed cells were stimulated with Bc.PGN (0, 1, 3 or 10 μg/ml) in the presence of M-CSF/RANKL for 2 days. The cells were then fixed and stained with TRAP. TRAP-positive MNCs with three or more nuclei were enumerated using an inverted microscope. OM, osteogenic medium containing 10 mM β-glycerophosphate and 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid. *P < 0.05.
Discussion
PGNs could be recognized by NOD1 and/or NOD2, which have subtle differences in their molecular structures30. Generally, the activation of NOD1 and NOD2 induces pro-inflammatory responses through NF-κB activation15. In this study, we report that NOD1 and NOD2 signaling pathways appear to have opposing effects on the regulation of bone metabolism. Previous reports indicated that NOD2 ligands increase bone mass by inducing osteoblast activity and reducing osteoclast activity18,19. By contrast, NOD1 ligands enhanced bone resorption by downregulating new bone formation. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 2, TriDAP enhanced bone resorption by downregulating both osteoblast differentiation and the stability of Runx2. In contrast to MDP, TriDAP also increased NF-κB activation in osteoblasts. NOD1 seems to be critical to the effects of TriDAP on bone metabolism, directly affecting osteoblasts while having no effect on osteoclasts. Therefore, NOD1 signaling, in contrast to NOD2 signaling, might regulate bone homeostasis by inducing bone resorption.
This study demonstrated that, in contrast to NOD2, NOD1 activation by synthetic ligands or a NOD1-activating PGN induces bone resorption. In alignment with our findings, Jiao et al. reported that NOD1 signaling plays an important role in the development of periodontitis, characterized by the destruction of alveolar bone31. NOD1-deficient mice exhibited reduced bone resorption compared with wild-type mice. An accumulation of NOD1-activating bacteria, specifically NI1060, was observed at the disease lesion, along with alveolar bone resorption caused by NI1060. NI1060 has been proposed to contribute to the development of periodontitis through alveolar bone resorption by inducing neutrophil recruitment and pro-inflammatory mediators. Although it remains unconfirmed whether Actinomyces naeslundii PGN activates NOD1, it has been demonstrated that A. naeslundii PGN induces alveolar bone resorption via osteoclastogenesis32. Our findings suggest that A. naeslundii PGN might activate NOD1. We propose that a NOD1 signaling blockade could serve as a therapeutic target for controlling inflammatory bone disease.
The indirect regulation of osteoclast differentiation by triggering osteoblasts is thought to be a common phenomenon in NOD1 and NOD2 signaling. In this study, TriDAP alone did not induce the differentiation of RANKL-primed BMMs. TriDAP resulted in minimal osteoclast differentiation in the presence of RANKL; however, it efficiently promoted osteoclastogenesis by upregulating the RANKL/OPG ratio in an osteoblast and osteoclast co-culture system. Furthermore, co-culturing NOD1-deficient osteoblasts with wild-type BMMs did not result in osteoclast differentiation. However, as expected, a co-culture of wild-type osteoblasts and NOD1-deficient osteoclasts induced osteoclast differentiation. A previous report indicated that the NOD2 ligand MDP affects bone homeostasis primarily through direct actions on osteoblasts rather than osteoclasts18. Unlike TriDAP, bacterial cell wall components such as synthetic lipoproteins and lipopolysaccharide efficiently induce osteoclastogenesis independent of RANKL33,34. NOD1 is ubiquitously expressed in various cell types, whereas NOD2 is expressed only in specific cells, including macrophages, osteoblasts and intestinal cells30. Interestingly, although NOD1 is also present in macrophages as precursors of osteoclasts, its ligands predominantly affect osteoblasts rather than osteoclasts. Further research is needed to examine how cell tropism influences bone metabolism through PGN.
The downregulation of Runx2, mediated by the NOD1–NF-κB axis, contributes to the inhibition of osteoblast differentiation. TriDAP increased Runx2 degradation by upregulating its ubiquitination, and Smurf1 enhanced the TriDAP-inhibition of Runx2. Previous studies indicate that both the canonical and noncanonical NF-κB signaling pathways inhibit bone formation by downregulating osteoblast differentiation35–37. NF-κB activation has been shown to decrease new bone formation by reducing the interaction of Runx2 and β-catenin with the osteocalcin/bone sialoprotein promoter38. Tumor necrosis factor alpha attenuates Runx2 expression by increasing Runx2 ubiquitination and upregulating Smurf1 expression39. Takami et al. reported that a small anti-NF-κB peptide derived from nuclear acidic protein alleviated ovariectomy-induced bone loss40. This anti-NF-κB peptide increased osteoblastogenesis by inducing Smad1 phosphorylation and decreased osteoclastogenesis by inhibiting NF-κB transcriptional activity. Thus, we propose that targeting the NOD1–NF-κB–Runx2 axis in osteoblasts could serve as a potential therapeutic strategy for bone loss.
NOD1 and NOD2 signaling pathways are both recognized for their roles in NF-κB activation29, but they have contrasting effects on bone metabolism. In previous reports, we demonstrated that MDP, a NOD2 ligand, induces bone formation by upregulating Runx2 and alleviates bone loss in OVX mice by inducing canonical WnT–β-catenin signaling18,19. In the present study, NOD1 ligands induced bone resorption and concurrently downregulated bone formation. Specifically, NOD1 ligands, in contrast to NOD2 ligands, inhibit Runx2 expression and enhance NF-κB activation in osteoblasts. MDP activates canonical Wnt–β-catenin signaling19. However, because Wnt–β-catenin signaling is well known to play a role in upregulating bone formation, we hypothesize that TriDAP might inhibit canonical Wnt–β-catenin signaling. Consistent with our findings, the NOD1 ligand, but not the NOD2 ligand, induces inflammatory responses in adipose tissue16. Fernandez et al. reported that oral administration of whole bacteria and PGN from L. salivarius Ls33 alleviated colitis in a NOD2-dependent manner17. NOD2 ligands have been shown to reduce the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and CXCL2 while increasing IL-10 expression, suggesting that they have anti-inflammatory properties. NOD2, in contrast to NOD1, activates antiviral responses in cells infected with human respiratory syncytial virus by inducing IRF3 and IFN-β production41. Taken together, these findings indicate that NOD1 and NOD2 have opposing effects on bone metabolism. Further research is required to identify the specific factors that contribute to this discrepancy.
Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota has been observed in OVX mice and patients with osteoporosis42,43. Factors such as aging and antibiotic use are known to alter gut microbiota composition44,45. During bacterial growth, PGN is constantly released, and antibiotic administration can trigger a PGN storm46. Notably, NOD1 activation by PGN derived from the gut microbiota has been shown to enhance innate immunity14. This study has demonstrated that, in contrast to NOD2, NOD1 synthetic ligands and PGN induce bone resorption. These findings are particularly important for elucidating the mechanisms underlying inflammatory bone diseases triggered by bacterial infections or microbiome abnormalities, and for identifying potential therapeutic targets in conditions associated with excessive osteoblast activity. Proper bone homeostasis, maintained by bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts, is essential for skeletal health. Therefore, NOD1 signaling may represent a novel therapeutic target for treating bone diseases such as osteopetrosis, melorheostosis and heterotopic ossification.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea, which is funded by the Korean government (RS-2022-NR067350, RS-2022-00164722, RS-2023-NR076347 and RS-2025-00518511). Cartoon in Supplementary Figure 2 was created with BioRender.com.
Author contributions
S.H.H. conceived the concept and idea. S.H.H. and O.-J.P. designed the experiments. O.-J.P., J.K., C.P., Y.L. and S.H.H. performed the experiments and interpreted the data. C.-H.Y. provided critical comments. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results, followed by writing and reviewing the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s12276-025-01522-0.
References
- 1.Boyle, W. J., Simonet, W. S. & Lacey, D. L. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature423, 337–342 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang, L., You, X., Zhang, L., Zhang, C. & Zou, W. Mechanical regulation of bone remodeling. Bone Res.10, 16 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang, H. et al. Osteoclast differentiation requires TAK1 and MKK6 for NFATc1 induction and NF-κB transactivation by RANKL. Cell Death Differ.13, 1879–1891 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Amarasekara, D.S., Kim, S. & Rho, J. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by cytokine networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 2851 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Komori, T. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by Runx2. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.658, 43–49 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lyu, Z., Hu, Y., Guo, Y. & Liu, D. Modulation of bone remodeling by the gut microbiota: a new therapy for osteoporosis. Bone Res.11, 31 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chu, H. & Mazmanian, S. K. Innate immune recognition of the microbiota promotes host-microbial symbiosis. Nat. Immunol.14, 668–675 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vollmer, W., Blanot, D. & de Pedro, M. A. Peptidoglycan structure and architecture. FEMS Microbiol Rev.32, 149–167 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Malanovic, N. & Lohner, K. Gram-positive bacterial cell envelopes: The impact on the activity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys. Acta1858, 936–946 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Girardin, S. E. & Philpott, D. J. Mini-review: the role of peptidoglycan recognition in innate immunity. Eur. J. Immunol.34, 1777–1782 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang, H., Gupta, D., Li, X. & Dziarski, R. Peptidoglycan recognition protein 2 (N-acetylmuramoyl-l-Ala amidase) is induced in keratinocytes by bacteria through the p38 kinase pathway. Infect. Immun.73, 7216–7225 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wheeler, R. et al. Microbiota-induced active translocation of peptidoglycan across the intestinal barrier dictates its within-host dissemination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA120, e2209936120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bersch, K. L. et al. Bacterial peptidoglycan fragments differentially regulate innate immune signaling. ACS Cent. Sci.7, 688–696 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clarke, T. B. et al. Recognition of peptidoglycan from the microbiota by Nod1 enhances systemic innate immunity. Nat. Med.16, 228–231 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Strober, W., Murray, P. J., Kitani, A. & Watanabe, T. Signalling pathways and molecular interactions of NOD1 and NOD2. Nat. Rev. Immunol.6, 9–20 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lappas, M. NOD1 expression is increased in the adipose tissue of women with gestational diabetes. J. Endocrinol.222, 99–112 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Macho Fernandez, E. et al. Anti-inflammatory capacity of selected lactobacilli in experimental colitis is driven by NOD2-mediated recognition of a specific peptidoglycan-derived muropeptide. Gut60, 1050–1059 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park, O. J., Kim, J., Yang, J., Yun, C. H. & Han, S. H. Muramyl dipeptide, a shared structural motif of peptidoglycans, is a novel inducer of bone formation through induction of Runx2. J. Bone Min. Res.32, 1455–1468 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park, O. J. et al. Muramyl dipeptide alleviates estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis through canonical Wnt signaling. J. Pathol.260, 137–147 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jeong, S. et al. Lipoproteins are key immunostimulatory components of Bacillus species for dendritic cell maturation and activation. Mol. Immunol.165, 82–91 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aubin, J. E. Advances in the osteoblast lineage. Biochem. Cell Biol.76, 899–910 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sudo, H., Kodama, H. A., Amagai, Y., Yamamoto, S. & Kasai, S. In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria. J. Cell Biol.96, 191–198 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shin, Y. S. et al. The Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway plays a role in drug-induced liver injury by regulating cytochrome P450 2E1 expression. Toxicol. Res.39, 443–453 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Park, O. J., Kim, H. J., Woo, K. M., Baek, J. H. & Ryoo, H. M. FGF2-activated ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase enhances Runx2 acetylation and stabilization. J. Biol. Chem.285, 3568–3574 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schroeder, T. M., Jensen, E. D. & Westendorf, J. J. Runx2: a master organizer of gene transcription in developing and maturing osteoblasts. Birth Defects Res. C. Embryo Today75, 213–225 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhao, M., Qiao, M., Oyajobi, B. O., Mundy, G. R. & Chen, D. E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 mediates core-binding factor alpha1/Runx2 degradation and plays a specific role in osteoblast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem.278, 27939–27944 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chang, J. et al. NF-κB inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by promoting beta-catenin degradation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA110, 9469–9474 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tukhvatulin, A. I. et al. A In vitro and in vivo study of the ability of NOD1 ligands to activate the transcriptional factor NF-kB. Acta Nat.3, 77–84 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Caruso, R., Warner, N., Inohara, N. & Nunez, G. NOD1 and NOD2: signaling, host defense, and inflammatory disease. Immunity41, 898–908 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moreira, L. O. & Zamboni, D. S. NOD1 and NOD2 signaling in infection and inflammation. Front. Immunol.3, 328 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jiao, Y. et al. Induction of bone loss by pathobiont-mediated Nod1 signaling in the oral cavity. Cell Host Microbe13, 595–601 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sato, T. et al. Peptidoglycan of Actinomyces naeslundii induces inflammatory cytokine production and stimulates osteoclastogenesis in alveolar bone resorption. Arch. Oral. Biol.57, 1522–1528 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim, J. et al. Lipoproteins are an important bacterial component responsible for bone destruction through the induction of osteoclast differentiation and activation. J. Bone Min. Res.28, 2381–2391 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu, J. et al. Molecular mechanism of the bifunctional role of lipopolysaccharide in osteoclastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem.284, 12512–12523 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yao, Z. et al. NF-κB RelB negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. J. Bone Min. Res.29, 866–877 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krum, S. A., Chang, J., Miranda-Carboni, G. & Wang, C. Y. Novel functions for NFκB: inhibition of bone formation. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.6, 607–611 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chang, J. et al. Inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation by nuclear factor-κB. Nat. Med.15, 682–689 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tarapore, R. S. et al. NF-κB has a direct role in inhibiting Bmp- and Wnt-induced matrix protein expression. J. Bone Min. Res.31, 52–64 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaneki, H. et al. Tumor necrosis factor promotes Runx2 degradation through up-regulation of Smurf1 and Smurf2 in osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem.281, 4326–4333 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Takami, K. et al. Anti-NF-κB peptide derived from nuclear acidic protein attenuates ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in mice. JCI Insight8, e171962 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Sabbah, A. et al. Activation of innate immune antiviral responses by Nod2. Nat. Immunol.10, 1073–1080 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang, J. et al. Diversity analysis of gut microbiota in osteoporosis and osteopenia patients. PeerJ5, e3450 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wen, K. et al. Fecal and serum metabolomic signatures and microbial community profiling of postmenopausal osteoporosis mice model. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.10, 535310 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang, Y. et al. The causal relationship between gut microbiota and bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomization study. Front. Microbiol.14, 1268935 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yuan, X. et al. Systemic antibiotics increase microbiota pathogenicity and oral bone loss. Int J. Oral. Sci.15, 4 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tan, C. T., Xu, X., Qiao, Y. & Wang, Y. A peptidoglycan storm caused by β-lactam antibiotic’s action on host microbiota drives Candida albicans infection. Nat. Commun.12, 2560 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







