Abstract
The recent growth and restructuring of the swine industry in the state of Mississippi has raised various environmental and socioeconomic concerns. We spatially examined the location and attributes of 67 industrial hog operations to determine if African American and low-income communities have a high prevalence of industrial hog operations located near their neighborhoods at the census block group level. We used spatial data and cross-classification analysis to compare the prevalence of industrial hog operations in neighborhoods that are primarily African American and low income with the prevalence in neighborhoods that are African American and affluent. We also used logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between the environmental justice variables and the location of the industrial hog operations. The block group characterization showed a high prevalence of hog operations in the four highest quintiles compared with the lowest quintile for percentage African American and percentage poverty. At increasing levels of percentage African Americans and percentage of persons in poverty, there are 2.4-3.6 times more operations compared with the referent group; additionally, scale adjustment to only the hog counties reduces this to 1.8-3.1 more operations compared with the referent group. The inequitable distribution of hog-confined agricultural feeding operations in these communities may have adverse environmental impacts associated with industrial hog production, such as increased health risks and quality of life degradation, as have occurred in other areas having similar facilities.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Donham K. J. Health effects from work in swine confinement buildings. Am J Ind Med. 1990;17(1):17–25. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700170105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perlin S. A., Sexton K., Wong D. W. An examination of race and poverty for populations living near industrial sources of air pollution. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1999 Jan-Feb;9(1):29–48. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiffman S. S. Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being. J Anim Sci. 1998 May;76(5):1343–1355. doi: 10.2527/1998.7651343x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wing S., Cole D., Grant G. Environmental injustice in North Carolina's hog industry. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):225–231. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wing S., Wolf S. Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):233–238. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]