Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Aug;110(Suppl 4):613–618. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s4613

Hypersensitivity of human subjects to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: a review of the literature.

Patrick Levallois 1
PMCID: PMC1241214  PMID: 12194895

Abstract

Hypersensitivity to exposure to electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) has been reported for nearly 20 years; however, the literature on the subject is still very limited. Nearly all the literature published concerns a dermatological syndrome that consists of mainly subjective symptoms (itching, burning, dryness) and a few objective symptoms (redness, dryness) appearing after individuals begin working with video display units and decreasing during absence from work. Case-control studies as well as some good but limited double-blind trials have not found any clear relationship between this syndrome and exposure to EMFs. A "general syndrome" with more general symptoms has been rarely described but seems to have a worse prognosis. The symptoms often associated with skin disorders are mainly of neurasthenic type and can cover a lot of nonspecific symptoms present in other atypical syndromes such as multiple chemical sensitivity or chronic fatigue. Most of these symptoms are allegedly triggered by exposure to different sources of EMFs, but there have been no valid etiological studies published on this more general syndrome. It appears that the so-called hypersensitivity to environmental electric and magnetic fields is an unclear health problem whose nature has yet to be determined.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (532.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson B., Berg M., Arnetz B. B., Melin L., Langlet I., Lidén S. A cognitive-behavioral treatment of patients suffering from "electric hypersensitivity". Subjective effects and reactions in a double-blind provocation study. J Occup Environ Med. 1996 Aug;38(8):752–758. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199608000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnetz B. B., Berg M., Anderzén I., Lundeberg T., Haker E. A nonconventional approach to the treatment of "environmental illness". J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Jul;37(7):838–844. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199507000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg M., Arnetz B. B., Lidén S., Eneroth P., Kallner A. Techno-stress. A psychophysiological study of employees with VDU-associated skin complaints. J Occup Med. 1992 Jul;34(7):698–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg M., Lidén S., Axelson O. Facial skin complaints and work at visual display units. An epidemiologic study of office employees. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990 Apr;22(4):621–625. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(90)70084-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berg M. Skin problems in workers using visual display terminals. A study of 201 patients. Contact Dermatitis. 1988 Nov;19(5):335–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergdahl J. Psychologic aspects of patients with symptoms presumed to be caused by electricity or visual display units. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995 Oct;53(5):304–310. doi: 10.3109/00016359509005992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergqvist U., Wahlberg J. E. Skin symptoms and disease during work with visual display terminals. Contact Dermatitis. 1994 Apr;30(4):197–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carmichael A. J., Roberts D. L. Visual display units and facial rashes. Contact Dermatitis. 1992 Jan;26(1):63–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldman L. R., Eaglstein W. H., Johnson R. B. Terminal illness. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985 Feb;12(2 Pt 1):366–366. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)80054-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hyams K. C. Developing case definitions for symptom-based conditions: the problem of specificity. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20(2):148–156. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kavet R., Tell R. A. VDTs: field levels, epidemiology, and laboratory studies. Health Phys. 1991 Jul;61(1):47–57. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199107000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koh D., Goh C. L., Jeyaratnam J., Kee W. C., Ong C. N. Dermatological symptoms among visual display unit operators using plasma display and cathode ray tube screens. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1990 Sep;19(5):617–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levallois Patrick, Neutra Raymond, Lee Geraldine, Hristova Lilia. Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Aug;110 (Suppl 4):619–623. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s4619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lidén C., Wahlberg J. E. Does visual display terminal work provoke rosacea? Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Oct;13(4):235–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lidén C., Wahlberg J. E. Work with video display terminals among office employees. V. Dermatologic factors. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985 Dec;11(6):489–493. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lidén S. "Sensitivity to electricity"--a new environmental epidemic. Allergy. 1996 Aug;51(8):519–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb04663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lindén V., Rolfsen S. Video computer terminals and occupational dermatitis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1981 Mar;7(1):62–64. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lonne-Rahm S., Andersson B., Melin L., Schultzberg M., Arnetz B., Berg M. Provocation with stress and electricity of patients with "sensitivity to electricity". J Occup Environ Med. 2000 May;42(5):512–516. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200005000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mezei G., Kheifets L. I., Nelson L. M., Mills K. M., Iriye R., Kelsey J. L. Household appliance use and residential exposure to 60-hz magnetic fields. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001 Jan-Feb;11(1):41–49. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Munich R. L. Contemporary treatment of schizophrenia. Bull Menninger Clin. 1997 Spring;61(2):189–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nilsen A. Facial rash in visual display unit operators. Contact Dermatitis. 1982 Jan;8(1):25–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1982.tb04129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Oftedal G., Nyvang A., Moen B. E. Long-term effects on symptoms by reducing electric fields from visual display units. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Oct;25(5):415–421. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Oftedal G., Vistnes A. I., Rygge K. Skin symptoms after the reduction of electric fields from visual display units. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Oct;21(5):335–344. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sandström M., Lyskov E., Berglund A., Medvedev S., Mild K. H. Neurophysiological effects of flickering light in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity. J Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jan;39(1):15–22. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199701000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stenberg B., Eriksson N., Mild K. H., Hög J., Sandström M., Sundell J., Wall S. Facial skin symptoms in visual display terminal (VDT) workers. A case-referent study of personal, psychosocial, building- and VDT-related risk indicators. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Aug;24(4):796–803. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.4.796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Swanbeck G., Bleeker T. Skin problems from visual display units. Provocation of skin symptoms under experimental conditions. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(1):46–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Trimmel M., Schweiger E. Effects of an ELF (50 Hz, 1 mT) electromagnetic field (EMF) on concentration in visual attention, perception and memory including effects of EMF sensitivity. Toxicol Lett. 1998 Aug;96-97:377–382. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson B. W., Wright C. W., Morris J. E., Buschbom R. L., Brown D. P., Miller D. L., Sommers-Flannigan R., Anderson L. E. Evidence for an effect of ELF electromagnetic fields on human pineal gland function. J Pineal Res. 1990;9(4):259–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079x.1990.tb00901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wood A. W., Armstrong S. M., Sait M. L., Devine L., Martin M. J. Changes in human plasma melatonin profiles in response to 50 Hz magnetic field exposure. J Pineal Res. 1998 Sep;25(2):116–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079x.1998.tb00548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES