Abstract
Electrocatalytic hydrazine oxidation holds great promise for enabling fuel cell-powered transportation since hydrazine hydrate (N2H4·H2O) has the highest energy density of all liquid, CO2-free fuels (3.45 kWh/L), and the highest fuel cell voltage (1.56 V vs O2). Inspired by the ruffling of catalytic centers in oxidative enzymes, we designed a twisted single-atom nanozyme comprising twisted FeN2+2C4+4 sites, enabling high accessibility of N2H4 and OH– reactants. Experimental evidence shows that this nanozyme catalyst achieves the lowest oxidation overpotential of all Fe–N–C materials, both in the lab and in direct hydrazine fuel cells, with an open-circuit voltage of 0.95 V, unprecedented for an Fe-based anode. The structure of the catalytic site is elucidated through a combination of electrochemistry, 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy with crystal field multiplet simulations and fits of the pre-edge features, as well as density functional theory calculations and theoretical simulations of X-ray absorption near edge structure. The experimental and theoretical methods reveal that twisting the active site also shifts its oxidation potential positively and improves N2 bubble removal while limiting ammonia production to less than 10 ppm. This work demonstrates the potential of active site twisting to enhance the oxidation of energy-rich and liquid substrates, representing a crucial step toward building a sustainable society.


Introduction
High volumetric energy density is the key fuel requirement for most fuel cell applications, ranging from transportation to stationary power generation. − Among liquid fuels, hydrazine (N2H4) has the highest theoretical cell voltage at 1.56 V against oxygen (compared to 1.23 V for H2) and the highest volumetric energy density of all CO2-free fuels at 3.45 kWh/L. These properties make hydrazine particularly attractive for carbon-neutral energy systems, as depicted in Figure . Unlike hydrogen, hydrazine is fully miscible with water, and hydrazine hydrate (N2H4·H2O, 64 wt % hydrazine) can be transported easily and safely. Despite these advantages, direct hydrazine fuel cells (DHFCs) have faced significant challenges that have hindered their development. While extensively studied in academic, industrial, and military laboratories during the 1970s, the momentum of DHFC research diminished due to the lack of suitable catalysts for its electrooxidation during fuel cell operation. − Systems relying on platinum group metals (PGMs) exhibit open-circuit voltages (OCVs) of around 1.0 V, as summarized in Table S1. However, while PGM catalysts are stable and selective for the full 4e– oxidation of hydrazine, their scarcity makes widespread adoption highly challenging, as has become clear in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. In later decades, important advances were made with first-row transition metals such as Co and Ni. Although they electrooxidize hydrazine at low overpotentials, Ni and Co are critical raw materials due to geopolitical challenges. Moreover, they promote the undesired decomposition of N2H4 to toxic NH3 and tend to deactivation by surface oxidation, resulting in low electron recovery (∼2 e–/N2H4) and incomplete fuel utilization.
1.
Hydrazine hydrate as an energy-dense liquid fuel: (a) theoretical cell voltages of fuel cells oxidizing different fuels and reducing O2. (b) Volumetric energy densities of different liquid fuels (Wh/L). Black bars indicate a CO2-producing fuel (see Table S2 for full data). (c) Representative values of OCVs of DHFCs, plotted against the earth crust abundance of the least abundant element in the catalyst, and grouped into PGMs, transition metals (TMs) (other than Fe) and Fe-based catalysts (see Table S1 for full data). Empty circles mark catalysts with elements that catalyze the undesired chemical decomposition of hydrazine to ammonia (Co, Ni, Pt, Ru, and Rh). This study (stars): (1) FeN 4 -twist anode with the Pt cathode; (2) FeN 4 -twist anode with the non-PGM CoFe-NC cathode; (3) FeN 4 -flat anode with the Pt cathode.
In contrast, iron is the fourth most abundant element in the earth crust, at 56 × 103 ppm (Figure c), more than other transition metals (10–103 ppm) or PGMs (1–10 ppb). Iron has been largely neglected in the search for DHFC anode catalysts, as manmade carbon-embedded Fe sites have shown only moderate activity toward hydrazine electro-oxidation. , However, Fe-based catalytic sites are central to oxidative enzymes in the nitrogen cycle, such as hydrazine dehydrogenase and hydroxylamine oxidoreductase. , In these enzymes, the catalytic FeN4C12 heme centers adopt a twisted (“ruffled”) conformation, where nitrogen-containing rings are twisted in opposite directions along the N–Fe–N axis (see Figure a). While the functional role of heme distortions into ruffled, dome-, or saddle-shaped structures is not fully elucidated, ruffling is nevertheless highly conserved in oxidative enzymes. This led to suggestions that ruffling affords a stronger (more positive) oxidizing potential through relative stabilization of the ferric (Fe3+) state over the ferrous (Fe2+) state and that it modifies the binding of substrates.
2.
Creating a ruffled FeN4 site for hydrazine oxidation. (a) A ruffled heme featuring in the catalytic site of hydrazine dehydrogenase enzyme: an FeN4 center with opposite pyrroles twisted along the N–Fe–N axis. Difference in OH– accessibility between a twisted FeN2+2 site (b), and a planar, carbon-embedded FeN4 site (c). The two materials as characterized by (d) X-ray diffractograms (compared to magnetite, COD 1526955), (e) Raman spectroscopy, (f) scanning electron microscopy, and (g) STEM-HAADF. (h) Hydrazine oxidation voltammograms on FeN 4 -twist and FeN 4 -flat in 1 M KOH, 20 mM N2H4, 10 mV s–1; on the bottom, ranges for typical onsets potentials for hydrazine oxidation on FeNCs (range and markings, Table S3) compared to FeN 4 -twist (red). (i) Cyanide poisoning of FeN 4 -twist confirms the role of iron in catalysis (see also Figure S4 for poisoning of FeN 4 -flat).
Inspired by the hypothesis that ruffling of FeN4 sites drives the oxidative ability of nitrogen-cycle enzymes, we sought to emulate this structural element in a heterogeneous electrocatalytic nanozyme. To this end, we designed and synthesized a twisted and open FeN2+2C4+4 catalytic site embedded in a carbon matrix, as illustrated in Figure b. Fe- and N-doped carbons (FeNCs) are electrocatalytically active in the nitrogen cycle (reduction of N2 and NO x ), − the oxygen cycle (reduction of O2, evolution of O2 and H2), − and the carbon cycle (reduction of CO x ). − Depending on the preparation method, Fe can be coordinated by four pyrrolic or pyridinic N atoms, embedded in a graphene sheet to give planar FeN4C12 or FeN4C10 moieties (Figure c). − By installing twisted FeN2+2 sites onto a crumpled support with many micropores, cracks, and edges, we aimed to increase the exposure of the active sites toward reactants, to help the removal of product bubbles, and possibly to offer additional reactivity pathways. Typical atomically dispersed FeN4 centers can electro-oxidize hydrazine with onset potentials of 0.36 ± 0.06 V vs RHE, which is earlier more negative than most Fe-based catalysts but still more positive than Pt (−0.05 V vs RHE). ,− Our twisted single-atom nanozyme demonstrated the lowest voltametric onset potential for hydrazine oxidation (0.20 V vs RHE at pH 14) compared to all Fe-based catalysts in the literature (0.36 ± 0.06 V vs RHE, Table S3). Moreover, this translated to the highest OCVs of a DHFC with an Fe-based anode, 0.95 V, which is comparable to values obtained with PGM anodes. We describe the structure of the new site through a combination of electrochemistry, 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, high-resolution electron microscopy, density functional theory (DFT) calculations, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) with crystal field multiplet simulations and fits of the pre-edge features, as well as theoretical X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) simulations, and compare it to the structure of the planar FeN4 sites found in conventional FeNC materials. We show how the twisted and open FeN2+2C4+4 structure enhances the site accessibility to both N2H4 and OH– reactants, while also shifting the Fe redox potential positive and accelerating the release of bubbles of N2 product.
Results and Discussion
Design, Characterization, and Electrochemistry of FeNC Catalysts
To promote the formation of twisted and open FeN2+2C4+4 sites, we aimed to install FeN4 moieties predominantly at the edges of adjacent graphene layers, e.g., in micropores, cracks, and other rough features. To this end, we combined the octahedral (that is, nonplanar) iron precursor tris(1,10-phenanthroline)-iron with a crumpled reduced graphene oxide (rGO) support that can provide folds, kinks, and micropores for Fe anchoring (see Experimental), yielding material FeN 4 -twist. A benchmark FeN4 control sample was prepared from a planar macrocyclic iron phthalocyanine precursor (FeN 4 -flat) using known methods. These two materials show similar features in bulk characterization: both have X-ray diffraction patterns with no Fe-based crystals beyond traces of magnetite (2θ = 43°, Figure d), and similar carbon features are obtained in Raman spectroscopy (Figure e). It is known that after thermal treatment and acid leaching, most FeNC materials typically contain a mixture of sites, such as FeN4C12, FeN4C10, nitrogen sites, and carbon sites, as well as iron-based inorganic particles. , The carbon scaffolds are crumpled in a similar fashion in FeN 4 -twist and FeN 4 -flat, as seen in scanning electron micrographs (Figure f), and show identical electrochemical surface areas (132 ± 7 and 139 ± 23 m2 g–1, respectively). Both materials contain dispersed iron centers (atoms or nanometric clusters), as revealed by high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM, Figures g and S1). Small clusters are known to modulate the catalytic activity, but increasing their concentration here (by raising the Fe content) did not affect hydrazine oxidation reaction (HzOR) rates, as seen in Figure S2. Hydrazine oxidation activity was tested in a 3-electrode cell with 1 M KOH and 20 mM hydrazine hydrate. The HzOR overpotentials on benchmark FeN 4 -flat were typical for FeNC materials (E onset = 0.30 V vs RHEpH=14, compared to 0.25–0.37 V vs RHEpH=14, as collected in Table S3). In contrast, FeN 4 -twist demonstrated outstanding activity, with an E onset over 100 mV more negative than that of other FeNCs, as seen in Figure h. This shift, suggesting an altogether different active site, was consistent through many repetitions of the synthesis, as seen in Figure S3. Both catalysts respond strongly to cyanide poisoning, confirming the role of iron at the catalytic site, rather than nitrogen dopants or carbon edge defects, as seen in Figures i and S4. ,
Elucidating the Structure of the Twisted FeN2+2C4+4 Sites
To investigate the chemical environment of the iron site, 57Fe Mössbauer spectra were collected at 5.5 (Figure a) and 298 K (Figure S5). The spectra of both FeN 4 -flat and FeN 4 -twist can be fitted with two doublets at 298 K and an additional one or two sextets at 5.5 K, respectively. The doublets observed at 5.5 K reveal atomically dispersed iron in two configurations, with D1 typically assigned to low-spin FeII or high-spin FeIII in planar FeN4C12 sites ,,, and D2 to intermediate-spin FeII in FeN4C10. As shown in Figure b, the 57Fe Mössbauer parameters for the D1 site at 5.5 K in FeN 4 -twist show lower chemical shift (CS) and higher quadruple splitting (QS) than D1 in FeN 4 -flat (CS = 0.38 vs 0.48 mm s–1, QS = 0.98 vs 0.65 mm s–1, respectively), indicating differences in the Fe electron density and structural environment. For the D2 sites, the CS is equal for both materials (0.46 mm s–1) and the QS is only 0.3 mm s–1 higher for FeN 4 -twist, indicating similar electron density and a slightly different electric field gradient at the Fe nucleus (Table S4 and Figure S5). The QS and CS of D2 in FeN 4 -twist at 298 K are within the range of those of a similar FeIIN2+2/C site (parameters in Table S4). The differences could arise from variations in geometric arrangements, square planar ligands, or a fifth ligand. The large experimental noise precludes unequivocal elucidation of the Fe sites, and a nonplanar FeN2+2 site can be neither confirmed nor excluded. ,− The sextets at 5.5 K arise from nonleached iron oxide nanoparticles or clusters (see discussion in the Supporting Information).
3.
Characterization of the active site in the FeN 4 -twist and FeN 4 -flat catalysts. (a) Mössbauer spectra measured at 5.5 K. (b) Mössbauer parameters for both sites at 5.5 K, with typical ranges of QS values. (c) XAFS spectra and (d) the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra, nonphase corrected (K-range 2.8–10). Wavelet transforms of (e) FeN 4 -twist and (f) FeN 4 -flat. The fitted linear combination (LCF, red) to the XANES spectra (blue), of the calculated spectra of the suggested structures (green and purple), for (g) FeN 4 -twist and (h) FeN 4 -flat. (i) Experimental pre-edge feature of the XANES, compared to representative fit multiplet simulations based on the FeN4C10 or FeN4C12 structures for FeN 4 -flat or the FeN2+2C4+4 structure for FeN 4 -twist, noting the additional feature of FeN 4 -flat between 7116 and 7118 eV arising for D 4h symmetry but missing for FeN 4 -twist (full assignments are given in Figures S8–S10).
To study the coordination environments of the Fe, both catalysts were characterized by XAS. , EXAFS at the Fe edge shows no Fe–Fe bonds at ∼4 Å, corroboratingwithin the existing limits of detectionthe HAADF-STEM observations that Fe is atomically dispersed in both catalysts (Figure c,d). This is further confirmed by wavelet transform analysis, where a single feature appears in Figure e,f, indicating only Fe–X bonds in both materials and thus a similar atomic composition in the first shell. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra in the Fe 2p region confirm the presence of Fe–N bonds (Figure S6). Due to the ensemble-average nature of XAS, the spectra of inequivalent sites are weighted in the total spectrum proportionally to their fraction in the sample, making site speciation an ill-posed problem for XAS methods alone. To prioritize between possible FeN x sites predicted by DFT calculations (Table S5), their theoretical XANES spectra were calculated (details are given in the Supporting Information). Subsequently, a search was performed for the combination of spectra that agrees best with the experimental data, in a “forward modeling” approach validated by the success of theoretical spectroscopy codes, such as FDMNES used here, for reproducing experimental spectra of Fe complexes. The candidate structures considered included multiple FeN x variants from the literature, as summarized in Table S5. For the benchmark FeN 4 -flat material, the best match with the experimental XANES spectrum is a 1:1 average of the calculated spectra of planar, partially oxygenated FeN4C10 and FeN4C12 moieties (Figure h), whereas other linear combinations yield significantly poorer fits (as presented in Figure S7). The formation of such FeN4O x moieties by pyrolysis of a carbon-supported iron phthalocyanine precursor is expected. ,, In contrast, the experimental XANES spectrum of FeN 4 -twist is best matched by a combination of the FeN2+2C4+4 moiety, where the nitrogen pairs occupy different planes, and the same moiety but with a coordinated oxygen atom (FeN2+2C4+4–O), as depicted in Figure h. Such FeN2+2 sites have been proposed based on evidence from time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and further supported by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, XAS, and DFT calculations. ,,,
The local environment of FeN2+2 sites was further probed by analysis of the pre-edge region of the XANES, since the transition intensity in this region increases in noncentrosymmetric environments (where 4p–3d hybridization is enabled) and can span larger ranges of energy for lower symmetry environments. , First, the XANES pre-edge of FeN 4 -twist and FeN 4 -flat was analyzed based on the DFT-calculated nonoxygenated structures (FeN2+2C4+4 for FeN 4 -twist and FeN4C10 or FeN4C12 for FeN 4 -flat). Crystal field multiplet simulations were fit, based on the methodology of Braun et al., suggesting a high-spin Fe(II) site for FeN 4 -twist and an intermediate spin Fe(II) site for FeN 4 -flat (Figures h, S8 and S9). In the case of the DFT-calculated oxygenated structure FeN2+2C4+4O, which was used to fit the XANES of FeN 4 -twist in Figure g, crystal field multiplet simulations were fit to the pre-edge XANES, confirming a high-spin Fe(III) site (Figure S10). In the case of FeN 4 -flat, either of the square planar (D 4h ) FeN4 configuration (C10 or C12, without O) yielded the observed pre-edge feature, while for FeN 4 -twist, an out-of-plane (tetrahedral) twist of a high-spin center was found for the nonoxygenated structure. Thus, fitting the multiplet simulations to the pre-edge region verifies the consistency of the models derived from the XANES and Mössbauer analyses.
Hydrazine Oxidation Mechanism
The enhanced hydrazine oxidation activity of the FeN2+2C4+4 site can arise from several mechanisms. First, ruffling the FeN4 core shifts the redox potential of the Fe positive (more oxidizing), as observed in enzymatic and molecular iron macrocycles. Indeed, DFT calculations confirm that the FeN2+2C4+4 site is easier to oxidize than the FeN4C10 or FeN4C12 sites by ∼0.6 eV (Table S6), enhancing the oxidizing ability of the twisted site. Interestingly, recent experiments and calculations have confirmed that the electronic structure of FeN4 sites can be affected by adjacent nitrogen defects, micropores, or second metals, leading to enhanced electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction. Twisting can therefore join these methods as a tuning variable for electrocatalytic hydrazine oxidation. In addition to electronic effects, the open FeN2+2C4+4 site allows OH– to coordinate to iron simultaneously with hydrazine and/or other NH x fragmentsan impossible feat in planar FeN4C x moieties. This enables the OH– to deprotonate NH x fragments from within both the first and the second coordination spheres, allowing the reaction mechanism to branch in new directions. Indeed, DFT-calculated adsorption energies of intermediates along several HzOR pathways showed that there are more mechanistic options when comparing the FeN2+2C4+4 site without OH– to the same site but with OH– coordinated (in two different positions, as either an H-bond donor or acceptor to the NH x fragment). As shown in Figure a (and summarized in Table S7), the reaction pathway without coordinated OH– has the rate-determining step of N2* → N2(g) (ΔE = 0.16 eV), but a switch between pathwaysallowing an OH– to coordinate next to the *N2 and assist in its desorptionlowers the ΔE for this step to −0.08 eV. Such branching of mechanistic pathways is only possible on the open FeN2+2 sites, leading to the experimentally observed 100 mV shift in the onset potential on FeN 4 -twist. Such an effect is indeed more meaningful for the oxidation of bulky N2H4 than that for the reduction of the smaller O2, where the FeN2+2 site has lower activity than the FeN4 sites. ,
4.
Characterization and fuel cell application of FeN4-twist. (a) Possible parallel reaction pathways for hydrazine oxidation, showing DFT-calculated adsorption energies of intermediates on FeN2+2C4+4 (black), and FeN2+2C4+4–OH in two relative orientations: the OH– is either the H-donor (red) or H-acceptor (blue) to the NH x fragment. The arrow indicates the change in the RDS, enabled by the simultaneous coordination of OH– and N2 at the open FeN2+2C4+4 site. (b,c) Chronoamperometric measurements at 0.45 V vs RHE for (b) FeN 4 -flat and (c) FeN 4 -twist, marking the current spikes due to N2 bubble release. (d) DHFC polarization curves at different temperatures using FeN 4 -twist anode and Pt cathode with loadings of 4.0 and 0.9 mg cm–2, respectively. Inset: a polarization curve in the kinetic region. Cell temperatures of 60, 80, and 100 °C with optimized cathode dew points, in 1 M N2H4·H2O + 4 M KOH, with anode and cathode flow rates of 0.002 and 0.5 L min–1 O2, respectively. (e) Completely PGM-free DHFC: FeN 4 -twist anode and CoFe cathode with loadings of 4.0 and 1.0 mg cm–2, respectively, in 0.5 M N2H4·H2O + 1 M KOH, with anode and cathode flow rates of 0.002 and 0.5 L min–1 O2.
The ability of FeN2+2C4+4 sites to take up edge-position in the carbon will also lead to better accessibility to the reactant stream: a hydrazine molecule approaching a plane-embedded FeN4 site can only arrive from one side (defining a hemisphere of approach vectors), while a nonplanar site located in micropores, folds, or edges can be accessed from more directionsup to a full sphere (as visualized in Figure b). This idea is further supported by the enhanced current density for the reduction of another molecule, nitrite, on FeN 4 -twist (Figure S12b), compared to FeN 4 -flat. Moreover, product removal from different site positions will further differ, enhancing overall reactivity. For example, edge-positioned FeN2+2 sites may be more susceptible to flooding by H2O, the product of oxygen reduction; in fact, we did observe lower O2 reduction activity on FeN 4 -twist than that on FeN 4 -flat (Figure S11a), confirming earlier predictions. In contrast, the N2 gas produced in hydrazine oxidation should be easier to dislodge from edges than from basal planes or water from micropores. To test this idea, we performed a 2 h chronoamperometric experiment at 0.45 V vs RHE, monitoring the current spikes due to the periodic release of N2 bubbles (Figure b,c). Indeed, the current spikes associated with bubble removal are more regular, more frequent, and smaller in area for FeN 4 -twist than that for FeN 4 -flat, indicating improved bubble removal. Since the macro morphology of the two carbons is identical, as seen in Figure e,f, the difference in bubble removal suggests that the N2-producing sites in FeN 4 -twist are more accessible on the microscopic scale (allowing N2 molecules to leave more easily) and the mesoscopic scale, e.g., being positioned near edges, cracks, or larger pores, where N2(g) bubbles do not get pinned. At even higher potentials >0.45 V vs RHE, as seen in Figure S12, FeN 4 -twist removes the gas continuously, while FeN 4 -flat still shows distinct current spikes. Moreover, to confirm the critical role of the crumpled graphene in positioning the FeN4 site on the support, we deposited the iron phenanthroline precursor on regular graphite powder (yielding FeN 4 -twist-Gr), rather than that on rGO as in FeN 4 -twist. The onset potential of FeN 4 -twist-Gr shifted 50 mV to positive relative to FeN 4 -twist (as seen in Figure S13), indicating that the twisted FeN4 site attaches more easily in the many folds and pores of crumpled rGO sheets. Furthermore, graphite can accept fewer twisted sites than the crumpled rGO, as evidenced by a 60% decrease in the Fe content relative to that of FeN 4 -twist (measured by ICP-MS, summarized in Table S8). Finally, loading equal amounts of the two iron precursors on rGO yielded 3 times more Fe on FeN 4 -twist than on FeN 4 -flat, further indicating that the twisted site can fit better on a crumpled surface. Overall, the source of enhanced hydrazine oxidation activity of FeN2+2C4+4 sites likely stems from a mixture of several sources: (1) more positive redox potential, enhancing the oxidizing ability of the Fe; (2) enabling branching of mechanism pathways to include OH– in either the first or second coordination sphere, allowing pathways with lower RDS barriers; and (3) higher microscopic accessibility of the open site for the reactant approach and bubble release.
In oxygen reduction electrocatalysis, Fe-based clusters may contribute by modulating the properties of atomically dispersed FeN x moieties. Indeed, some clusters are present, observed occasionally by HRTEM (Figure S2) and as sextet 2 in the 5.5 K Mössbauer spectrum (Figure a). The clusters could arise by deterioration of Fe centers, known to degrade oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. , Indeed, the activity of freshly synthesized FeN 4 -twist degrades somewhat after a few days of air exposure (Figure S14). To gauge the contribution of the clusters to hydrazine oxidation electrocatalysis, we lowered the Fe content in FeN 4 -twist from 3 to 1 wt % (as determined by ICP-MS and summarized in Table S8). This successfully reduced the cluster content, as evident from typical STEM-HAADF micrographs, while the HzOR activity remained the same at both loadings (Figure S2). This suggests that the role of iron clusters in HzOR electrocatalysis is negligible.
Finally, a DHFC was constructed to test FeN 4 -twist and FeN 4 -flat at cell temperatures of 60, 80, and 100 °C with 4 M N2H4·H2O + 1 M KOH solution feed at anode and O2 at cathode. High catalytic activity of FeN 4 -twist was observed in the kinetic region in Figure d, with an OCV of 0.945 V at 60 °C (compared to 0.75 V for FeN 4 -flat in Figure S15). Herein, the advantage in the onset potential of FeN 4 -twist over FeN 4 -flat in an RDE experiment was successfully transferred to a real membrane electrode assembly set up of a DHFC, with an ∼200 mV higher OCV. The OCV of 0.945 V is on par with the benchmark PGM catalysts and is the highest observed for an HzOR electrocatalyst based on Fe, the most abundant metal on earth. Unlike with other transition metals, no meaningful amount of ammonia was measured in the anolyte outlet, with a signal lower than the 10 ppm detection limit (Figure S16). Moreover, a relatively high OCV of 0.84 V was registered even when an entirely PGM-free DHFC was used with a CoFe cathode replacing Pt, as seen in Figure e. An increase in the cell temperature up to 100 °C significantly enhances the peak power density and limits current density, indicating faster reaction kinetics and better mass transport (Table S9).
Conclusions
A twisted single-atom nanozyme was designed by biomimetic ruffling of a carbon-embedded FeN4 moiety on crumpled rGO. The twisted and open FeN2+2C4+4 active site, inspired by ruffled heme cores in oxidative enzymes such as hydrazine dehydrogenase, provides enhanced microscopic accessibility for reactants and better bubble removal during the electro-oxidation of energy-dense hydrazine hydrate. This leads to outstanding electrocatalytic activity, with an 100 mV advance in onset potential compared to planar FeN4 structures. The enhanced catalytic performance translated well to a DHFC, where the FeN 4 -twist material achieved an open-circuit voltage of 0.95 V, comparable to that of benchmark PGM catalysts. By optimizing the nanoscale accessibility of the active site, this study positions earth-abundant FeNC materials as strong contenders for driving hydrazine oxidation electrocatalysis, revitalizing interest in hydrazine as the most energy-dense, carbon-free fuel for sustainable energy applications.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation (grant 1910/23), the Israel Ministry of Energy (grant 2033539), and the Nancy and Stephen Grand Technion Energy Program (GTEP). I.O.-P. thanks the Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center (ISTRC) for a graduate fellowship. U.K. and L.N. thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for financial support of the project CRC1487 “Iron, upgraded!” (project number 443703006). XAS data analysis by A.I.F. and S.X. was supported by the US National Science Foundation under Award 2102655. A.I.F. gratefully acknowledges the Schulich visiting professor lectureship at Technion. We thank Dr. Thierry K. Slot for his help with NMR measurements, Dr. Yaron Kauffman (Technion) for help with STEM-HAADF images, Dr. Oren Bar Bachar (Technion) for help with enzyme visualization, and Dr. Pini Shekhter (Tel Aviv University) for help with XPS measurements.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c08450.
Experimental methods; synthesis; characterization details; control experiments; further spectroscopic, microscopic, electrochemical, and computational data; analysis; and discussions (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Andújar J. M., Segura F.. Fuel cells: History and updating. A walk along two centuries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009;13:2309–2322. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.03.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cano Z. P., Banham D., Ye S., Hintennach A., Lu J., Fowler M., Chen Z.. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. Nat. Energy. 2018;3:279–289. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X. X., Swihart M. T., Wu G.. Achievements, challenges and perspectives on cathode catalysts in proton exchange membrane fuel cells for transportation. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:578–589. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0304-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J., Xu H., Li J., Gong K., Yue F., Han X., Wu K., Shao P., Fu Q., Zhu Y., Xu W., Huang X., Xie J., Wang F., Yang W., Zhang T., Xu Z., Feng X., Wang B.. Oxygen- and proton-transporting open framework ionomer for medium-temperature fuel cells. Science. 2024;385:1115–1120. doi: 10.1126/science.adq2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakamoto T., Serov A., Masuda T., Kamakura M., Yoshimoto K., Omata T., Kishi H., Yamaguchi S., Hori A., Horiuchi Y., Terada T., Artyushkova K., Atanassov P., Tanaka H.. Highly durable direct hydrazine hydrate anion exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources. 2018;375:291–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Soloveichik G. L.. Liquid fuel cells. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014;5:1399–1418. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.5.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burshtein T. Y., Yasman Y., Muñoz-Moene L., Zagal J. H., Eisenberg D.. Hydrazine Oxidation Electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2024;14:2264–2283. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c05657. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Evans G. E., Kordesch K. V.. Hydrazine-Air Fuel Cells: Hydrazine-air fuel cells emerge from the laboratory. Science. 1967;158:1148–1152. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3805.1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perry, J. Inexpensive Catalysts for Hydrazine Fuel Cell Anodes; Army Electronics Lab Technical Report AD0640867, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Taschek, W. G. History of Fuel Cell R&D at Fort Belvoir, Virginia; Army Power Division Report APPT-TR-08-01, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Serov A., Kwak C.. Direct hydrazine fuel cells: A review. Appl. Catal., B. 2010;98:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Finkelstein D. A., Imbeault R., Garbarino S., Roué L., Guay D.. Trends in Catalysis and Catalyst Cost Effectiveness for N2H4 Fuel Cells and Sensors: a Rotating Disk Electrode (RDE) Study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:4717–4738. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jaouen F., Proietti E., Lefèvre M., Chenitz R., Dodelet J.-P., Wu G., Chung H. T., Johnston C. M., Zelenay P.. Recent advances in non-precious metal catalysis for oxygen - reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4:114–130. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00011f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Directorate-General for Internal Market . Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (European Commission), M. Grohol and C. Veeh, Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023: Final Report; Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Asset T., Roy A., Sakamoto T., Padilla M., Matanovic I., Artyushkova K., Serov A., Maillard F., Chatenet M., Asazawa K., Tanaka H., Atanassov P.. Highly active and selective nickel molybdenum catalysts for direct hydrazine fuel cell. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;215:420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y.-C., Wan L.-Y., Cui P.-X., Tong L., Ke Y.-Q., Sheng T., Zhang M., Sun S.-H., Liang H.-W., Wang Y.-S., Zaghib K., Wang H., Zhou Z.-Y., Yuan J.. Porous Carbon Membrane-Supported Atomically Dispersed Pyrrole-Type Fe-N4 as Active Sites for Electrochemical Hydrazine Oxidation Reaction. Small. 2020;16:2002203. doi: 10.1002/smll.202002203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Wang Y., Yang C., Chen S., Li Z., Cheng Y., Wang H., Xiang Y., Lu S., Wang S.. Elucidating the electro-catalytic oxidation of hydrazine over carbon nanotube-based transition metal single atom catalysts. Nano Res. 2021;14:4650–4657. doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3397-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Akram M., Dietl A., Mersdorf U., Prinz S., Maalcke W., Keltjens J., Ferousi C., de Almeida N. M., Reimann J., Kartal B., Jetten M. S. M., Parey K., Barends T. R. M.. A 192-heme electron transfer network in the hydrazine dehydrogenase complex. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaav4310. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav4310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cedervall P., Hooper A. B., Wilmot C. M.. Structural Studies of Hydroxylamine Oxidoreductase Reveal a Unique Heme Cofactor and a Previously Unidentified Interaction Partner. Biochemistry. 2013;52:6211–6218. doi: 10.1021/bi400960w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akram M., Dietl A., Mersdorf U., Prinz S., Maalcke W., Keltjens J., Ferousi C., de Almeida N. M., Reimann J., Kartal B., Jetten M. S. M., Parey K., Barends T. R. M.. A 192-heme electron transfer network in the hydrazine dehydrogenase complex. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaav4310. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav4310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shelnutt J. A., Song X.-Z., Ma J.-G., Jia S.-L., Jentzen W., Medforth C. J., Medforth C. J.. Nonplanar porphyrins and their significance in proteins. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998;27:31–42. doi: 10.1039/a827031z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kleingardner J. G., Bren K. L.. Biological Significance and Applications of Heme c Proteins and Peptides. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48:1845–1852. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liptak M. D., Wen X., Bren K. L.. NMR and DFT Investigation of Heme Ruffling: Functional Implications for Cytochrome c . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:9753–9763. doi: 10.1021/ja102098p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ojha K., Farber E. M., Burshtein T. Y., Eisenberg D.. A Multi-Doped Electrocatalyst for Efficient Hydrazine Oxidation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:17168–17172. doi: 10.1002/anie.201810960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Z.-Y., Karamad M., Yong X., Huang Q., Cullen D. A., Zhu P., Xia C., Xiao Q., Shakouri M., Chen F.-Y., Kim J. Y., Xia Y., Heck K., Hu Y., Wong M. S., Li Q., Gates I., Siahrostami S., Wang H.. Electrochemical ammonia synthesis via nitrate reduction on Fe single atom catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2870. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23115-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy E., Liu Y., Sun B., Chen Y.-H., Guo S., Atanassov P.. Atomically Dispersed Metal–Nitrogen–Carbon Catalysts for Electrochemical Nitrogen Transformations to Ammonia and Beyond. ACS Catal. 2024;14:9797–9811. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c02717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu G., More K. L., Johnston C. M., Zelenay P.. High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt. Science. 2011;332:443–447. doi: 10.1126/science.1200832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wan X., Liu X., Li Y., Yu R., Zheng L., Yan W., Wang H., Xu M., Shui J.. Fe–N–C electrocatalyst with dense active sites and efficient mass transport for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:259–268. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0237-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Asset T., Atanassov P.. Iron-Nitrogen-Carbon Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Joule. 2020;4:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yin S., Chen L., Yang J., Cheng X., Zeng H., Hong Y., Huang H., Kuai X., Lin Y., Huang R., Jiang Y., Sun S.. A Fe-NC electrocatalyst boosted by trace bromide ions with high performance in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:7489. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51858-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kisand K., Sarapuu A., Douglin J. C., Kikas A., Käärik M., Kozlova J., Aruväli J., Treshchalov A., Leis J., Kisand V., Kukli K., Dekel D. R., Tammeveski K.. Hierarchically Porous Fe–N–C Single-Atom Catalysts via Ionothermal Synthesis for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ChemSusChem. 2025;18:e202401332. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202401332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu J., Hsu C.-S., Bai L., Chen H. M., Hu X.. Atomically dispersed Fe3+ sites catalyze efficient CO2 electroreduction to CO. Science. 2019;364:1091–1094. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Shan W., Zachman M. J., Wang M., Hwang S., Tabassum H., Yang J., Yang X., Karakalos S., Feng Z., Wang G., Wu G.. Atomically Dispersed Dual-Metal Site Catalysts for Enhanced CO2 Reduction: Mechanistic Insight into Active Site Structures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202205632. doi: 10.1002/anie.202205632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bao Y., Xiao J., Huang Y., Li Y., Yao S., Qiu M., Yang X., Lei L., Li Z., Hou Y., Wu G., Yang B.. Regulating Spin Polarization via Axial Nitrogen Traction at Fe–N5 Sites Enhanced Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction for Zn–CO2 Batteries. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202406030. doi: 10.1002/anie.202406030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Sougrati M. T., Zitolo A., Ablett J. M., Oğuz I. C., Mineva T., Matanovic I., Atanassov P., Huang Y., Zenyuk I., Di Cicco A., Kumar K., Dubau L., Maillard F., Dražić G., Jaouen F.. Identification of durable and non-durable FeNx sites in Fe–N–C materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Catal. 2021;4:10–19. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00545-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ni L., Gallenkamp C., Wagner S., Bill E., Krewald V., Kramm U. I.. Identification of the Catalytically Dominant Iron Environment in Iron- and Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Catalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:16827–16840. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c04865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai J., Zhao T., Xu M., Mei B., Yang L., Shi Z., Zhu S., Wang Y., Jiang Z., Zhao J., Ge J., Xiao M., Liu C., Xing W.. Monosymmetric Fe-N4 sites enabling durable proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathode by chemical vapor modification. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:4219. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47817-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Y., He F., Chen M., Zhang J., Hu G., Ma D., Guo J., Fan H., Li W., Hu X.. Mimicking Hydrazine Dehydrogenase for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxidation of N2H4 by Fe–NC. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:38183–38191. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c10637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burshtein T. Y., Aias D., Wang J., Sananis M., Farber E. M., Gazit O. M., Grinberg I., Eisenberg D.. Fe–N–C electrocatalysts in the oxygen and nitrogen cycles in alkaline media: the role of iron carbide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021;23:26674–26679. doi: 10.1039/D1CP03650E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salton I., Ioffe K., Burshtein T. Y., Farber E. M., Seraphim N. M., Segal N., Eisenberg D.. Lanthanoid coordination compounds as diverse self-templating agents towards hierarchically porous Fe–N–C electrocatalysts. Mater. Adv. 2022;3:7937–7945. doi: 10.1039/D2MA00596D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Muhyuddin M., Berretti E., Mirshokraee S. A., Orsilli J., Lorenzi R., Capozzoli L., D’Acapito F., Murphy E., Guo S., Atanassov P., Lavacchi A., Santoro C.. Formation of the active site structures during pyrolysis transformation of Fe-phthalocyanine into Fe-Nx-C electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal., B. 2024;343:123515. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Sougrati M. T., Zitolo A., Ablett J. M., Oğuz I. C., Mineva T., Matanovic I., Atanassov P., Huang Y., Zenyuk I., Di Cicco A., Kumar K., Dubau L., Maillard F., Dražić G., Jaouen F.. Identification of durable and non-durable FeNx sites in Fe–N–C materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Catal. 2021;4:10–19. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00545-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ni L., Gallenkamp C., Paul S., Kübler M., Theis P., Chabbra S., Hofmann K., Bill E., Schnegg A., Albert B., Krewald V., Kramm U. I.. Active Site Identification in FeNC Catalysts and Their Assignment to the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Pathway by In Situ 57Fe Mössbauer Spectroscopy. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2021;2:2000064. doi: 10.1002/aesr.202000064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Strickland K., Miner E., Jia Q., Tylus U., Ramaswamy N., Liang W., Sougrati M.-T., Jaouen F., Mukerjee S.. Highly active oxygen reduction non-platinum group metal electrocatalyst without direct metal–nitrogen coordination. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7343. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Primbs M., Sun Y., Roy A., Malko D., Mehmood A., Sougrati M.-T., Blanchard P.-Y., Granozzi G., Kosmala T., Daniel G., Atanassov P., Sharman J., Durante C., Kucernak A., Jones D., Jaouen F., Strasser P.. Establishing reactivity descriptors for platinum group metal (PGM)-free Fe–N–C catalysts for PEM fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020;13:2480–2500. doi: 10.1039/D0EE01013H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chung M. W., Chon G., Kim H., Jaouen F., Choi C. H.. Electrochemical Evidence for Two Sub-families of FeNC Moieties with Concentration-Dependent Cyanide Poisoning. ChemElectroChem. 2018;5:1880–1885. doi: 10.1002/celc.201800067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Menga D., Wagner F. E., Fellinger T.-P.. Life cycle of single atom catalysts: a Mössbauer study on degradation and reactivation of tetrapyrrolic Fe–N–C powders. Mater. Horiz. 2023;10:5577–5583. doi: 10.1039/D3MH00308F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mineva T., Matanovic I., Atanassov P., Sougrati M.-T., Stievano L., Clémancey M., Kochem A., Latour J.-M., Jaouen F.. Understanding Active Sites in Pyrolyzed Fe–N–C Catalysts for Fuel Cell Cathodes by Bridging Density Functional Theory Calculations and 57Fe Mössbauer Spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2019;9:9359–9371. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b02586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H., Chung H. T., Cullen D. A., Wagner S., Kramm U. I., More K. L., Zelenay P., Wu G.. High-performance fuel cell cathodes exclusively containing atomically dispersed iron active sites. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019;12:2548–2558. doi: 10.1039/C9EE00877B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nematollahi P., Barbiellini B., Bansil A., Lamoen D., Qingying J., Mukerjee S., Neyts E. C.. Identification of a Robust and Durable FeN4Cx Catalyst for ORR in PEM Fuel Cells and the Role of the Fifth Ligand. ACS Catal. 2022;12:7541–7549. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c01294. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kramm U. I., Herranz J., Larouche N., Arruda T. M., Lefèvre M., Jaouen F., Bogdanoff P., Fiechter S., Abs-Wurmbach I., Mukerjee S., Dodelet J.-P.. Structure of the catalytic sites in Fe/N/C-catalysts for O2-reduction in PEM fuel cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14:11673–11688. doi: 10.1039/c2cp41957b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kramm U. I., Lefèvre M., Larouche N., Schmeisser D., Dodelet J.-P.. Correlations between Mass Activity and Physicochemical Properties of Fe/N/C Catalysts for the ORR in PEM Fuel Cell via 57Fe Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Other Techniques. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:978–985. doi: 10.1021/ja410076f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kottwitz M., Li Y., Wang H., Frenkel A. I., Nuzzo R. G.. Single Atom Catalysts: A Review of Characterization Methods. Chem. Methods. 2021;1:278–294. doi: 10.1002/cmtd.202100020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hua Q., Madsen K. E., Esposito A. M., Chen X., Woods T. J., Haasch R. T., Xiang S., Frenkel A. I., Fister T. T., Gewirth A. A.. Effect of Support on Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity of Supported Iron Porphyrins. ACS Catal. 2022;12:1139–1149. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c04871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Finzel J., Sanroman Gutierrez K. M., Hoffman A. S., Resasco J., Christopher P., Bare S. R.. Limits of Detection for EXAFS Characterization of Heterogeneous Single-Atom Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2023;13:6462–6473. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c01116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Joly Y.. X-ray absorption near-edge structure calculations beyond the muffin-tin approximation. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2001;63:125120. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.125120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- An Z., Yang P., Duan D., Li J., Wan T., Kong Y., Caratzoulas S., Xiang S., Liu J., Huang L., Frenkel A. I., Jiang Y.-Y., Long R., Li Z., Vlachos D. G.. Highly active, ultra-low loading single-atom iron catalysts for catalytic transfer hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:6666. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42337-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouwkamp-Wijnoltz A. L., Visscher W., van Veen J. A. R., Boellaard E., van der Kraan A. M., Tang S. C.. On Active-Site Heterogeneity in Pyrolyzed Carbon-Supported Iron Porphyrin Catalysts for the Electrochemical Reduction of Oxygen: An In Situ Mössbauer Study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:12993–13001. doi: 10.1021/jp0266087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lefèvre M., Dodelet J. P., Bertrand P.. Molecular Oxygen Reduction in PEM Fuel Cells: Evidence for the Simultaneous Presence of Two Active Sites in Fe-Based Catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:8705–8713. doi: 10.1021/jp020267f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Szakacs C. E., Lefèvre M., Kramm U. I., Dodelet J.-P., Vidal F.. A density functional theory study of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction in Fe/N/C catalysts used in H2/O2 fuel cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:13654–13661. doi: 10.1039/c3cp55331k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haverkort M. W., Zwierzycki M., Andersen O. K.. Multiplet ligand-field theory using Wannier orbitals. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012;85:165113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.165113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vercamer V., Hunault M. O. J. Y., Lelong G., Haverkort M. W., Calas G., Arai Y., Hijiya H., Paulatto L., Brouder C., Arrio M.-A., Juhin A.. Calculation of optical and K pre-edge absorption spectra for ferrous iron of distorted sites in oxide crystals. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94:245115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.245115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Braun A., Gee L. B., Mara M. W., Hill E. A., Kroll T., Nordlund D., Sokaras D., Glatzel P., Hedman B., Hodgson K. O., Borovik A. S., Baker M. L., Solomon E. I.. X-ray Spectroscopic Study of the Electronic Structure of a Trigonal High-Spin Fe(IV)O Complex Modeling Non-Heme Enzyme Intermediates and Their Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:18977–18991. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c06181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura M.. Electronic structures of highly deformed iron(III) porphyrin complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006;250:2271–2294. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lyu L., Hu X., Lee S., Fan W., Kim G., Zhang J., Zhou Z., Kang Y.-M.. Oxygen Reduction Kinetics of Fe–N–C Single Atom Catalysts Boosted by Pyridinic N Vacancy for Temperature-Adaptive Zn–Air Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:4803–4813. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c13111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang P., Chen H.-C., Zhu H., Chen K., Li T., Zhao Y., Li J., Hu R., Huang S., Zhu W., Liu Y., Pan Y.. Inter-site structural heterogeneity induction of single atom Fe catalysts for robust oxygen reduction. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:2062. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46389-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sui R., Liu B., Chen C., Tan X., He C., Xin D., Chen B., Xu Z., Li J., Chen W., Zhuang Z., Wang Z., Chen C.. Constructing Asymmetric Fe–Nb Diatomic Sites to Enhance ORR Activity and Durability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:26442–26453. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c09642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hursán D., Samu A. A., Janovák L., Artyushkova K., Asset T., Atanassov P., Janáky C.. Morphological Attributes Govern Carbon Dioxide Reduction on N-Doped Carbon Electrodes. Joule. 2019;3:1719–1733. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




