Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Aug;110(Suppl 4):625–629. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s4625

Somatic symptoms in women 11 years after the Chornobyl accident: prevalence and risk factors.

Evelyn J Bromet 1, Semyon Gluzman 1, Joseph E Schwartz 1, Dmitry Goldgaber 1
PMCID: PMC1241216  PMID: 12194897

Abstract

Exposure to the Chornobyl nuclear power plant explosion resulted in widespread, persistent somatic complaints, but little is known about the nature and risk factors for these conditions. This study compares the health reports of 300 women evacuated to Kyiv from the contamination zone around the plant and 300 controls with a child in the same homeroom as the evacuees in 1997. The interview addressed somatic concerns, risk factors for poor health, and Chornobyl-related stress. Compared with controls, evacuees reported significantly more health problems and rated their health more poorly overall. These differences remained significant after controlling for demographic and clinical risk factors, including the tendency to amplify physical symptoms. Significantly more evacuees received a diagnosis of a Chornobyl-related illness by a local physician, believed that their health and their children's health had been adversely affected, and were positive for Chornobyl-induced post-traumatic stress disorder. After controlling for these Chornobyl stress variables, the differences in number of health problems commonly attributed to Chornobyl remained significant but differences in general health ratings did not. The perceptions of controls were similar to those of women in a national sample. The relationship between Chornobyl stress and illness was twice as strong in evacuees (odds ratio = 6.95) as in Kyiv controls (odds ratio = 3.34) and weakest in the national sample (odds ratio = 1.64). The results confirm the persistence and nonspecificity of the subjective medical consequences of Chornobyl and are consistent with the hypothesis that traumatic events exert their greatest negative impacts on health in vulnerable or disadvantaged groups.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (528.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bard D., Verger P., Hubert P. Chernobyl, 10 years after: health consequences. Epidemiol Rev. 1997;19(2):187–204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsky A. J., Borus J. F. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 1;130(11):910–921. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsky A. J., Goodson J. D., Lane R. S., Cleary P. D. The amplification of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;50(5):510–519. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198809000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baum A., Fleming I. Implications of psychological research on stress and technological accidents. Am Psychol. 1993 Jun;48(6):665–672. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.6.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bromet E. J., Goldgaber D., Carlson G., Panina N., Golovakha E., Gluzman S. F., Gilbert T., Gluzman D., Lyubsky S., Schwartz J. E. Children's well-being 11 years after the Chornobyl catastrophe. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;57(6):563–571. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.6.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bromet E., Dew M. A. Review of psychiatric epidemiologic research on disasters. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(1):113–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buzunov V. A., Strapko N. P., Pirogova E. A., Krasnikova L. I., Bugayev V. N., Korol N. A., Treskunova T. V., Ledoschuk B. A., Gudzenko N. A., Bomko E. I. Epidemiological survey of the medical consequences of the Chernobyl accident in Ukraine. World Health Stat Q. 1996;49(1):4–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cunny K. A., Perri M., 3rd Single-item vs multiple-item measures of health-related quality of life. Psychol Rep. 1991 Aug;69(1):127–130. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Göthe C. J., Molin C., Nilsson C. G. The environmental somatization syndrome. Psychosomatics. 1995 Jan-Feb;36(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71701-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Havenaar J. M., van den Brink W. Psychological factors affecting health after toxicological disasters. Clin Psychol Rev. 1997;17(4):359–374. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00009-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Havenaar J., Rumyantzeva G., Kasyanenko A., Kaasjager K., Westermann A., van den Brink W., van den Bout J., Savelkoul J. Health effects of the Chernobyl disaster: illness or illness behavior? A comparative general health survey in two former Soviet regions. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Dec;105 (Suppl 6):1533–1537. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiecolt-Glaser Janice K., McGuire Lynanne, Robles Theodore F., Glaser Ronald. Psychoneuroimmunology and psychosomatic medicine: back to the future. Psychosom Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;64(1):15–28. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200201000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kroenke K., Spitzer R. L., deGruy F. V., 3rd, Hahn S. R., Linzer M., Williams J. B., Brody D., Davies M. Multisomatoform disorder. An alternative to undifferentiated somatoform disorder for the somatizing patient in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;54(4):352–358. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160080011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phelan J., Schwartz J. E., Bromet E. J., Dew M. A., Parkinson D. K., Schulberg H. C., Dunn L. O., Blane H., Curtis E. C. Work stress, family stress and depression in professional and managerial employees. Psychol Med. 1991 Nov;21(4):999–1012. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700029998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Robbins J. M., Kirmayer L. J. Transient and persistent hypochondriacal worry in primary care. Psychol Med. 1996 May;26(3):575–589. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Southwick S. M., Morgan C. A., 3rd, Nicolaou A. L., Charney D. S. Consistency of memory for combat-related traumatic events in veterans of Operation Desert Storm. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Feb;154(2):173–177. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.2.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spitzer R. L., Williams J. B., Gibbon M., First M. B. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;49(8):624–629. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stiehm E. R. The psychologic fallout from Chernobyl. Am J Dis Child. 1992 Jun;146(6):761–762. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160180121029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ullman S. E., Siegel J. M. Traumatic events and physical health in a community sample. J Trauma Stress. 1996 Oct;9(4):703–720. doi: 10.1007/BF02104098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES