Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Aug 19;25(35):13251–13257. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c03251

Enhancement of the Biexciton Binding Energy in Laterally Confined CdSe Nanoplatelets

Carmelita Rodà , David F Macias-Pinilla ‡,, Alessio Di Giacomo , Josep Planelles , Juan I Climente ‡,*, Iwan Moreels †,*
PMCID: PMC12412167  PMID: 40830083

Abstract

Optical amplification in CdSe nanoplatelets (NPLs) has been linked to biexcitons with a large binding energy ΔBX, preventing dissociation at room temperature. While the exciton binding energy ΔX has been studied extensively, ΔBX in colloidal NPLs is typically inferred using the 2D Haynes rule, ΔBX = 0.228·ΔX. Systematic studies of ΔBX in CdSe NPLs with varying thicknesses and lateral dimensions are still lacking. Here, we used transient absorption spectroscopy to investigate ΔBX, through photoinduced biexciton absorption. ΔBX ranges between 40 and 55 meV and increases by 30% when reducing the width from 9 to 3 nm, while overall 3.5 ML NPLs have only 10% higher ΔBX compared to 4.5 ML NPLs. Fitting the linear absorbance spectra, we extracted ΔX and demonstrate that the ΔBXX ratio is substantially lower than 0.228. Results confirm that biexcitons in CdSe NPLs are stable at room temperature and have an increased ΔBX in laterally confined NPLs.

Keywords: 2D nanomaterials, excitons, biexcitons, binding energy, Haynes factor, k·p theory


graphic file with name nl5c03251_0006.jpg


graphic file with name nl5c03251_0005.jpg


Solution-processed nanoplatelets (NPLs) are promising materials for light emission and amplification due to their narrow and tunable photoluminescence, high oscillator strength of the optical transitions, large exciton and biexciton ,,,− binding energies, and fast radiative decay lifetimes. ,− These desirable features have led to the demonstration of efficient light-emitting diodes (LEDs), as well as amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) ,− and lasing ,− at room temperature. The low optical gain thresholds ,,, and high material and modal gain coefficients ,,, have been linked to a stable biexciton population, even at high carrier density. ,, This distinctive feature of colloidal two-dimensional materials arises from the combination of quantum and dielectric confinement of charge carriers, which enhances the electron–hole Coulomb interactions in these systems compared to bulk materials and epitaxial quantum wells, leading to exciton binding energies largely exceeding thermal energy at room temperature.

Excitons are quasiparticles formed by an electron and a hole bound by Coulomb interactions. In bulk semiconductors, ΔX typically amounts to 1–15 meV. Confining excitons in one or more directions can increase ΔX. Through a variational calculation, ΔX can be written as

ΔX=(μmeε2)(2α1)2EH 1

Here, μ is the reduced exciton mass (expressed in units of electron mass m e), ε is the relative dielectric constant, α is a dimensional parameter that varies from 3 for bulk, over 2 for an infinitely thin quantum well, to 1 for a quantum wire, and E H is the hydrogen binding energy of 13.6 eV. Reducing α from 3 to 2, 2D semiconductors already allow for a 4-fold increase of ΔX. Note that eq is derived starting from a Hamiltonian, which is fractal for the kinetic energy but not for the Coulomb potential, which maintains a 1/r dependence. Because of this, the 1D limit leads to an infinite binding energy, which is not realistic. However, the equation does highlight that both transversal and lateral confinement increases ΔX.

Two excitons can interact and form a biexciton. Typically, the energy that keeps the two excitons together (biexciton binding energy, ΔBX) is proportional to ΔX, which is known as the Haynes rule. Early studies on epitaxial GaAs quantum wells, based on effective mass calculations, suggested that ΔBXX = 0.1–0.15, depending on the well thickness. However, photoluminescence experiments yielded a constant Haynes factor ΔBXX ≈ 0.2, regardless of the thickness. The latter result was interpreted by Singh and co-workers as the limit of a squared biexciton in a strictly 2D system, where they found ΔBXX = 0.228.

Haynes’ rule has been previously applied to infer ΔBX in colloidal 2D materials ,,, and transition-metal dichalcogenide nanosheets; a Haynes factor of 0.228 has also been assumed in CdSe , and CsPbBr3 , NPLs, yet this has not been verified experimentally. In addition, epitaxial wells and NPLs present relevant differences. In contrast to epitaxial quantum wells, which are typically embedded in a cladding layer of similar dielectric constant, colloidal 2D NPLs are capped with an organic ligand shell and typically suspended in a low-dielectric solvent. In addition, the thickness is an order of magnitude smaller than in epitaxial wells (ca. 1 nm vs ca. 10 nm). Both dielectric and spatial confinement increase the electron–hole Coulomb interaction ,,, and thus ΔX and ΔBX. In the case of CdSe (ε = 6–10) suspended in an organic solvent (ε = 2) it can yield values on the order of 100–450 meV for ΔX and 10–55 meV for ΔBX (Figure ), which are much larger than ΔX ≈ 5 meV and ΔBX ≈ 1 meV obtained in GaAs quantum wells. This provides a unique testbed to probe the 2D Haynes rule using colloidal NPLs. From a theoretical perspective, Climente et al. have studied the ΔBXX ratio in CdSe and halide perovskite NPLs. The calculations highlighted that biexcitons in NPLs depart from an ideal flat square configuration. This results in ΔBXX < 0.2, with the actual ratio showing minor dependence on the NPL thickness, but a sizable one on the width dependence. By contrast, ΔBX increases with both smaller thickness and width. The above controversy underlines the importance of determining accurate experimental values for both ΔX and ΔBX, if one wishes to employ 2D colloidal NPLs in efficient optical amplifiers and lasers that rely on stable biexciton populations ,− or as single-photon emitters with high purity, which would benefit from a large exciton–biexciton energy splitting to spectrally filter out biexciton emission.

1.

1

(a) Exciton binding energies reported in the literature. Full circles correspond to values recorded using various spectroscopic techniques, including current work (black). Open symbols show calculated values using either the high frequency (ε = 6) or static (ε = 10) CdSe dielectric constant. (b) Biexciton binding energies reported in the literature (closed squares ,,− ) and in the current work (black), together with calculated values (open circles).

ΔX in CdSe NPLs has been quantified using various spectroscopic methods and modeling tools, as well tight-binding, variational quantum Monte Carlo (VQMC) simulations, and combined density functional theory/k·p calculations (Figure a). Despite significant scattering of the data, a general increase in ΔX with decreasing NPL thickness is observed. The same trend has been reported for CsPbBr3 NPLs. In addition to this, VQMC simulations predict an increase of ΔX with decreasing NPL width, which could explain part of the scattering observed for a single thickness. Data on ΔBX are scarcer and show a similar issue with scattering (Figure b).

We therefore systematically investigated the thickness and lateral dependence of ΔX and ΔBX in CdSe NPLs. To this aim, we analyzed linear and transient absorption spectra of a set of 3.5 and 4.5 ML CdSe NPLs with various lateral dimensions and carried out VQMC simulations in the same thickness and width range. We found that ΔBX ranges between 40 and 55 meV, and the width reduction yields the most important variation of ΔBX. We correlated these data with ΔX derived from absorption spectra, using a quantum well fitting model with restricted fitting parameters derived from the effective masses of the electron (E) and heavy (HH), light (LH), and split-off (SO) holes. Finally, we obtained that the Haynes factor ΔBXX falls significantly below 0.228 for large NPLs (ΔBXX ≈ 0.15), yet it increases in laterally confined NPLs.

We carried out our investigation on a set of 3.5 and 4.5 ML of CdSe NPLs with various lateral dimensions. The NPLs were synthesized following established procedures, , tuning the width of the particles between 3 and 10 nm. Figure a,b shows representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of 3.5 ML NPLs with lateral dimensions of 3.7 × 25.6 nm and 4.5 ML NPLs of 4.3 × 28.8 nm, respectively. Figure c displays the absorbance spectra of the investigated samples, showing the typical HH–E transitions at ∼2.4 eV and ∼2.7 eV for 4.5 and 3.5 ML, respectively. A slight variation of the HH–E transition within the set of samples with the same thickness can be observed, which can be ascribed to lateral confinement. , As highlighted in Figure d, the variation matches the empirical relation (solid lines) already reported for CdSe NPLs (d: NPL thickness, w: NPL width, in nm): ,

EHH=1.49+1.27d+0.40w2 2

2.

2

(a, b) Representative TEM images of 3.5 ML (a) and 4.5 ML (b) NPLs, with lateral dimensions of 3.7 × 25.6 nm and 4.3 × 28.8 nm, respectively. The scale bar equals 50 nm. (c) Absorbance spectra of 3.5 ML (blue) and 4.5 ML (green) CdSe NPLs with various lateral dimensions. The spectra are normalized to the HH–E intensity and shifted for clarity. (d) Energy of the HH–E peak extracted from the absorption spectra in (c) plotted against the NPL width, as extracted from TEM images. (e, f) Representative absorbance spectra and fits for 3.5 ML (e) and 4.5 ML (f) CdSe NPLs, together with individual contributions of HH–E, LH–E, and, in the case of 3.5 ML NPLs, SO–E exciton and free-carrier transitions. (g, h) Resulting exciton binding energy ΔX for 3.5 ML (g) and 4.5 ML (h) NPLs as a function of width (closed circles), together with calculated values using a dielectric constant of 10 (upward triangles). Data are fitted with an exponential function; see also SI, Figure S2.

We first extracted ΔX by fitting the absorbance spectra, using the approach introduced for colloidal nanoplatelets by Naeem et al. Close to the band gap, the NPL absorbance spectrum can be decomposed in a series of exciton absorption lines and free-carrier absorption steps, originating from the HH–E, LH–E, and, in the case of 3.5 ML NPLs and laterally confined 4.5 ML NPLs (SI, Figure S1), SO–E transitions. The associated equations are reported in Supporting Information, Section S3. The procedure is straightforward, yet has led to relatively low and disparate values of ΔX, ranging between 130 and 180 meV. ,, We therefore restricted fitting parameters to improve consistency. First, the ratio of the HH–E and LH–E exciton binding energies should equal the ratio of their in-plane reduced exciton masses, μ LH/μ HH (see also eq ). Second, the strength (amplitude) of the free-carrier absorption depends on the transition dipole moment (equal for HH–E and LH–E transitions), multiplied by the joint density of states ρ 2,D = μ/( 2π). Hence, the amplitude ratio is also equal to the ratio of the HH–E and LH–E reduced exciton masses. Considering these arguments, and using reduced exciton masses derived from the effective electron and hole masses reported by Benchamekh et al., μ X,LH/μ X,HH amounts to 1.04 and 1.02 for 4.5 and 3.5 ML CdSe NPLs, respectively. These fixed ratios also apply to ΔX,LHX,HH and A C,LH/A C,HH and are used in the fits to the absorbance spectrum. Figure e,f shows the overall result and individual HH–E, LH–E, and SO–E contributions, for 5.7 × 34.5 nm 4.5 ML NPLs and 7.5 × 33.2 nm 3.5 ML NPLs, respectively. At first glance, when performing the fits on samples with varying width, ΔX shows no dependence on lateral confinement, with average values of 253 meV for 4.5 ML NPLs and 268 meV for 3.5 ML NPLs (Figure g,h, closed symbols), agreeing well with recent results obtained by two-photon absorption spectroscopy.

For the VQMC modeling of ΔX (Figure g,h, open symbols, see also SI, Section S2), nonparabolicity of the bands should not be neglected; hence we use the thickness-dependent NPL tight-binding effective masses. We used a CdSe dielectric constant of ε = 10 and outer dielectric constant of ε out = 2. We fitted the calculated data with an exponential decay ΔX=ΔX,·[1+AXexp(w/w0,X)] , where A X (= 0.52) is a global parameter for both thicknesses and w 0,X equals 3.4 and 4.2 nm for 3.5 and 4.5 ML NPLs, respectively (see also SI, Figure S2). Using the same A X and w 0,X, and fitting the experimental data with only ΔX, as fit parameter, we obtain fair agreement between experimental and calculated values, with differences between experimental and calculated data of 12% and 21% for 4.5 and 3.5 ML NPLs, respectively. In principle, further agreement could be obtained by optimizing the dielectric constants of NPLs and surroundings and the effective masses of electrons or holes or by using a finite potential well in the calculations. More importantly, we can also observe that the fit essentially covers the scatter of ΔX obtained experimentally, which is why we do not observe a dependence on the width. To reduce this scatter, the fit procedure of the absorption spectrum and corresponding extraction of ΔX should likely be further refined.

Moving to ΔBX, Figure a presents a schematic of the exciton and biexciton transitions in laterally confined NPLs. Biexciton formation in CdSe NPLs has been demonstrated using circularly polarized pump–probe spectroscopy. Considering transitions at K = 0, the exciton-to-biexciton (X → BX) absorption onset should manifest itself at energies E BX,0 = 2E X,0 – ΔBX, with E X,0 being the energy of the ground-state-to-exciton (0 → X) transition (Figure a). Depending on the state-of-motion of the exciton center-of mass, vertical transitions at K ≠ 0 can occur, and, since the biexciton is twice as heavy as the exciton, the different curvature of the exciton and biexciton states will lead to transitions at different K taking place at different energies. As such, the biexciton absorption spectrum is an asymmetric peak with a low-energy tail. In Figure b we report as a representative example the ΔA map of 3.5 ML CdSe NPLs with lateral dimensions of 6.4 × 41.1 nm, obtained by resonantly exciting the HH–E transition at a 10 μJ/cm2 fluence (SI, Section S4). Alongside with the light- and heavy-hole exciton bleach signals, a photoinduced absorbance (PA) signal appears on the low-energy side, characterized by such a low-energy tail. The shape and spectral position of the maximum stay constant (Figure c). The spectral difference between the PA and the exciton bleach, equal to ΔBX, is obtained by fitting the exciton bleach with a function that accounts for asymmetric broadening of the exciton line. , For the PA we used the same function convoluted with a Boltzmann factor, to include the thermal occupation of K ≠ 0 states for the biexciton , (SI, Section S4). A representative example of this fit is shown in Figure d for the ΔA spectrum recorded at 700 fs. However, the analysis can be simplified. Figure e shows the values of ΔBX of the 3.5 ML NPLs obtained by fitting ΔA, together with ΔBX calculated by directly taking the energy difference between the maximum of the PA and the minimum of the bleach (SI, Figure S3). Both values are in good agreement, highlighting that ΔBX can be determined accurately by the simplified method.

3.

3

(a) Energy levels of the exciton (X) and biexciton (BX) states. The ground state-to-exciton (0 → X) and the exciton-to-biexciton (X → BX) transitions are indicated by the red and the blue solid arrow, respectively. Here E X,0 and E BX,0 are the exciton and biexciton energy at K = 0. E g equals the free-carrier band gap, and ΔX and ΔBX are the exciton and biexciton binding energy, respectively. (b) Differential absorbance (ΔA) spectrum as a function of the pump–probe delay for 3.7 × 25.6 nm 3.5 ML NPLs, excited at 460 nm at a 10 μJ/cm2 fluence. (c) Corresponding ΔA spectra at 700 fs, 2 and 3 ps. (d) Fit (gray) of the ΔA spectra (black) recorded at 700 ps and decomposition into biexciton PA (blue) and exciton (red) bleach signal. (e) ΔBX of 3.5 ML CdSe NPLs with width ranging between 3.5 and 9 nm, obtained by fitting the ΔA spectra (closed circles) and by taking the energy difference between the bleach minimum and the PA maximum (open circles).

We thus evaluate ΔBX for the set of CdSe NPLs investigated here using the energy difference between the PA and the exciton bleach. Figure a,b shows the width dependence of ΔBX for the set of 3.5 and 4.5 ML CdSe NPLs investigated here (closed circles). The values of ΔBX range between 45 and 55 meV and between 40 and 50 meV for 3.5 and 4.5 ML of CdSe, respectively. Notably, decreasing the thickness from 4.5 to 3.5 ML leads to an increase of about 10%, while decreasing the NPL width from 10 nm to 3 nm leads to a substantially larger increase of ΔBX, by 30%. This highlights that reducing the lateral dimensions of the NPLs is a more robust way to enhance ΔBX, compared with decreasing the thickness.

4.

4

Biexciton binding energies in CdSe NPLs. Experimental (full symbols) and simulated (open triangles, diamonds) ΔBX of (a) 3.5 ML (blue) and (b) 4.5 ML (green) CdSe NPLs extracted from the ΔA spectra. The simulated data set is obtained with VQMC simulations, and ε = 10 for the exciton and ε = 9.5 for the biexciton (upward triangles), or ε = 10 for both (diamonds). (c) Ratio of the exciton-to-biexciton binding energies for 3.5 ML (blue) and 4.5 ML (green) CdSe NPLs. The Haynes rule is indicated by a dashed line.

In order to verify the experimental ΔBX values, we again carried out VQMC simulations, under the following conditions: previous experiments and modeling on perovskite quantum dots , already showed that excitons and biexcitons polarize the lattice differently; hence, the effective dielectric constant that they experience can differ (see also SI, Section S5). We therefore calculated ΔBX = 2·E XE BX, from the exciton eigenenergy (E X) using ε = 10, and the biexciton eigenenergy E BX using ε = 9.5. We obtained good agreement between experimental and calculated data (Figure a,b) and confirmed that use of the different dielectric constants leads to an improved correspondence (compare to calculations using ε = 10 for both E X and E BX, open diamonds). We again fitted calculations with an exponential function, ΔBX=ΔBX,·[1+ABXexp(w/w0,BX)] , where A BX (= 0.81) is a global parameter for both thicknesses, and w 0,BX equals 4.6 and 6.1 nm for 3.5 and 4.5 ML NPLs, respectively. Using these parameters for the fit of the experimental data, ΔBX, , the biexciton binding energy of laterally unconfined NPLs extrapolates to 37 and 31 meV for 3.5 and 4.5 ML NPLs, respectively (see SI Figure S4 for extended width range).

Finally, now that we have obtained both ΔX, from linear absorption spectra, and ΔBX, from transient absorption spectra, we can determine the Haynes factor ΔBXX. A ratio of 0.228 was calculated by Singh et al. for an ideal (square) 2D biexciton geometry. In CdSe NPLs, however, due to their finite thickness and asymmetric electron and hole masses, biexcitons rather form a distorted tetrahedron. Figure c confirms that the experimental Haynes factor falls well below the theoretical limit for all samples. In agreement with previous results on epitaxial quantum wells, our data do not show a dependence on thickness. We do observe a decrease in the Haynes factor with increasing width, down to 0.15 for NPLs with large lateral sizes. This is due to the slightly different exponential decrease of ΔX and ΔBX with width (e.g., for 4.5 ML NPLs, w 0,X = 4.2 nm, w 0,BX = 6.1 nm), which can be understood from the larger size of the biexciton compared to the exciton, extending the width w for which lateral confinement still plays a role. At any rate, the experimental Haynes factor should provide an improved estimation of ΔBX from ΔX, if direct measurements are not available.

In conclusion, we carried out theoretical and experimental quantifications of the exciton and biexciton binding energy in CdSe nanoplatelets. Experimental ΔX values only showed a small increase for thinner NPLs and no clear width dependence, while ΔBX was observed to increase when reducing both the thickness and width. Variational quantum Monte Carlo simulations reproduce this behavior and confirmed that the small increase in ΔX for laterally confined NPLs may fall within the experimental scatter observed. Since the increase of ΔBX is significantly larger when reducing the width, our data highlight that lateral confinement, i.e., going to a nanowire geometry, is an efficient way to boost the biexciton binding energies in CdSe NPLs. In addition, results confirm that the Haynes factor in CdSe NPLs is lower than 0.228, obtained for an ideal square 2D geometry, with a value of 0.15 for larger NPLs. Our results provide insights into the fine-tuning of exciton and biexciton binding energies in colloidal NPLs and should be readily extendable to other classes of 2D nanomaterials, such as 2D perovskites, or transition-metal dichalcogenide nanosheets, or even hetero-NPLs, such as type-I CdSe/CdS core/crown NPLs, type-I CdSe/ZnS NPLs, or quasi-type II CdSe/CdS NPLs, where both charge delocalization and a modification of the dielectric constant by the semiconductor crown or shell can further influence the exciton binding energy. They can also provide valuable guidelines to engineer optoelectronic and photonic applications based on strongly bound excitons and biexcitons.

Supplementary Material

nl5c03251_si_001.pdf (409.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the UGent BOF GOA (Grant GOA01G02124 SATOMA) and the Research Foundation – Flanders (grant no. G037221N HITEC). JIC and DMP acknowledge support from Grant No. PID2021-128659NB-I00, funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF “A way of making Europe”). TEM measurements were performed at the UGent TEM Core Facility. Transient absorption spectroscopy was performed at the UGent NoLimits Core Facility.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c03251.

  • Synthetic methods and structural analysis; details on the variational quantum Monte Carlo simulations; deconvolution of the absorption spectrum; details on the transient absorption spectroscopy and determination of the exciton and biexciton binding energy (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Ithurria S., Dubertret B.. Quasi 2D colloidal CdSe platelets with thicknesses controlled at the atomic level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:16504–16505. doi: 10.1021/ja807724e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertrand G. H. V., Polovitsyn A., Christodoulou S., Khan A. H., Moreels I.. Shape control of zincblende CdSe nanoplatelets. Chem. Commun. 2016;52:11975–11978. doi: 10.1039/C6CC05705E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Polovitsyn A., Dang Z., Movilla J. L., Martín-García B., Khan A. H., Bertrand G. H., Brescia R., Moreels I.. Synthesis of air-stable CdSe/ZnS core–shell nanoplatelets with tunable emission wavelength. Chem. Mater. 2017;29:5671–5680. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Swift M. W., Efros A. L., Erwin S. C.. Controlling light emission from semiconductor nanoplatelets using surface chemistry. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:7737. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51842-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Geiregat P., Rodà C., Tanghe I., Singh S., Giacomo D., Lebrun D., Grimaldi G., Maes J., Van D., Moreels I.. et al. Localization-Limited Exciton Oscillator Strength in Colloidal CdSe Nanoplatelets Revealed by The Optically Induced Stark Effect. Light Sci. Appl. 2021;10:112. doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00548-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diroll B. T., Schaller R. D.. Reexamination of the giant oscillator strength effect in cdse nanoplatelets. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023;127:4601–4608. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodà C., Geiregat P., Di Giacomo A., Moreels I., Hens Z.. Area-Independence of the Biexciton Oscillator Strength in CdSe Colloidal Nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 2022;22:9537–9543. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ayari S., Quick M. T., Owschimikow N., Christodoulou S., Bertrand G. H. V., Artemyev M., Moreels I., Woggon U., Jaziri S., Achtstein A. W.. Tuning trion binding energy and oscillator strength in a laterally finite 2D system: CdSe nanoplatelets as a model system for trion properties. Nanoscale. 2020;12:14448–14458. doi: 10.1039/D0NR03170D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Naeem A., Masia F., Christodoulou S., Moreels I., Borri P., Langbein W.. Giant exciton oscillator strength and radiatively limited dephasing in two-dimensional platelets. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:121302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.121302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ji B., Rabani E., Efros A. L., Vaxenburg R., Ashkenazi O., Azulay D., Banin U., Millo O.. Dielectric Confinement and Excitonic Effects in Two-Dimensional Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano. 2020;14:8257–8265. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c01950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shornikova E. V., Yakovlev D. R., Gippius N. A., Qiang G., Dubertret B., Khan A. H., Di Giacomo A., Moreels I., Bayer M.. Exciton Binding Energy in CdSe Nanoplatelets Measured by One- and Two-Photon Absorption. Nano Lett. 2021;21:10525–10531. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shin A. J., Hossain A. A., Tenney S. M., Tan X., Tan L. A., Foley J. J. I., Atallah T. L., Caram J. R.. Dielectric Screening Modulates Semiconductor Nanoplatelet Excitons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021;12:4958–4964. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zelewski S. J., Nawrot K. C., Zak A., Gladysiewicz M., Nyk M., Kudrawiec R.. Exciton Binding Energy of Two-Dimensional Highly Luminescent Colloidal Nanostructures Determined from Combined Optical and Photoacoustic Spectroscopies. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019;10:3459–3464. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brumberg A., Harvey S. M., Philbin J. P., Diroll B. T., Lee B., Crooker S. A., Wasielewski M. R., Rabani E., Schaller R. D.. Determination of the In-Plane Exciton Radius in 2D CdSe Nanoplatelets via Magneto-optical Spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 2019;13:8589–8596. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b02008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scott R., Achtstein A. W., Prudnikau A. V., Antanovich A., Siebbeles L. D. A., Artemyev M., Woggon U.. Time-Resolved Stark Spectroscopy in CdSe Nanoplatelets: Exciton Binding Energy, Polarizability, and Field-Dependent Radiative Rates. Nano Lett. 2016;26:6576–6583. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Benchamekh R., Gippius N. A., Even J., Nestoklon M. O., Jancu J.-M., Ithurria S., Dubertret B., Efros A. L., Voisin P.. Tight-binding calculations of image-charge effects in colloidal nanoscale platelets of CdSe. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;89:035307. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.035307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Macias-Pinilla D. F., Planelles J., Climente J. I.. Biexcitons in CdSe nanoplatelets: geometry, binding energy and radiative rate. Nanoscale. 2022;14:8493–8500. doi: 10.1039/D2NR01354A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mazzotti S., Mühlematter M. U., Galli G., Norris D. J.. Theory of excitons in colloidal semiconductor nanoplatelets. Phys. Rev. B. 2024;110:195433. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martin P. I., Panuganti S., Portner J. C., Watkins N. E., Kanatzidis M. G., Talapin D. V., Schaller R. D.. Excitonic Spin-Coherence Lifetimes in CdSe Nanoplatelets Increase Significantly with Core/Shell Morphology. Nano Lett. 2023;23:1467–1473. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yao Y., Bao X., Zhu Y., Sui X., Hu A., Bai P., Wang S., Yang H., Liu X., Gao Y.. Lateral quantum confinement regulates charge carrier transfer and biexciton interaction in CdSe/CdSeS core/crown nanoplatelets. Nano Res. 2023;16:10420–10428. doi: 10.1007/s12274-023-5542-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grim J. Q., Christodoulou S., Di Stasio F., Krahne R., Cingolani R., Manna L., Moreels I.. Continuous-wave biexciton lasing at room temperature using solution-processed quantum wells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014;9:891–895. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Geiregat P., Tomar R., Chen K., Singh S., Hodgkiss J. M., Hens Z.. Thermodynamic Equilibrium between Excitons and Excitonic Molecules Dictates Optical Gain in Colloidal CdSe Quantum Wells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019;10:3637–3644. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodà C., Di Giacomo A., Tasende Rodríguez L. C., M C. S., Leemans J., Hens Z., Geiregat P., Moreels I.. Colloidal CdSe/CdS Core/Crown Nanoplatelets for Efficient Blue Light Emission and Optical Amplification. Nano Lett. 2023;23:3224–3230. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c05061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tessier M. D., Javaux C., Maksimovic I., Loriette V., Dubertret B.. Spectroscopy of Single CdSe Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano. 2012;6:6751–6758. doi: 10.1021/nn3014855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Di Giacomo A., Rodà C., Khan A. H., Moreels I.. Colloidal Synthesis of Laterally Confined Blue-Emitting 3.5 Monolayer CdSe Nanoplatelets. Chem. Mater. 2020;32:9260–9267. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leemans J., Singh S., Li C., Ten Brinck S., Bals S., Infante I., Moreels I., Hens Z.. Near-Edge Ligand Stripping and Robust Radiative Exciton Recombination in CdSe/CdS Core/Crown Nanoplatelets. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020;11:3339–3344. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Giovanella U., Pasini M., Lorenzon M., Galeotti F., Lucchi C., Meinardi F., Luzzati S., Dubertret B., Brovelli S.. Efficient Solution-Processed Nanoplatelet-Based Light-Emitting Diodes with High Operational Stability in Air. Nano Lett. 2018;18:3441–3448. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kelestemur Y., Shynkarenko Y., Anni M., Yakunin S., De Giorgi M. L., Kovalenko M. V.. Colloidal CdSe Quantum Wells with Graded Shell Composition for Low-Threshold Amplified Spontaneous Emission and Highly Efficient Electroluminescence. ACS Nano. 2019;13:13899–13909. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Qu J., Rastogi P., Greboval C., Livache C., Dufour M., Chu A., Chee S. S., Ramade J., Xu X. Z., Ithurria S.. et al. Nanoplatelet-Based Light-Emitting Diode and Its Use in All-Nanocrystal LiFi-like Communication. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:22058–22065. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c05264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Guo, Y. ; Gao, F. ; Huang, P. ; Wu, R. ; Gu, W. ; Wei, J. ; Liu, F. ; Li, H. . Light-emitting diodes based on two-dimensional nanoplatelets. Energy Mater. Adv. 2022, 2022, 10.34133/2022/9857943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Guzelturk B., Kelestemur Y., Olutas M., Delikanli S., Demir H. V.. Amplified Spontaneous Emission and Lasing in Colloidal Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano. 2014;8:6599–6605. doi: 10.1021/nn5022296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. She C., Fedin I., Dolzhnikov D. S., Dahlberg P. D., Engel G. S., Schaller R. D., Talapin D. V.. Red, Yellow, Green, and Blue Amplified Spontaneous Emission and Lasing Using Colloidal CdSe Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9475–9485. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. She C., Fedin I., Dolzhnikov D. S., Demortière A., Schaller R. D., Pelton M., Talapin D. V.. Low-threshold stimulated emission using colloidal quantum wells. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2772–2777. doi: 10.1021/nl500775p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guzelturk B., Kelestemur Y., Akgul M. Z., Sharma V. K., Demir H. V.. Ultralow Threshold One-Photon- and Two-Photon-Pumped Optical Gain Media of Blue-Emitting Colloidal Quantum Dot Films. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014;5:2214–2218. doi: 10.1021/jz500726h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li M., Zhi M., Zhu H., Wu W.-Y., Xu Q.-H., Jhon M. H., Chan Y.. Ultralow-threshold multiphoton-pumped lasing from colloidal nanoplatelets in solution. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Altintas Y., Gungor K., Gao Y., Sak M., Quliyeva U., Bappi G., Mutlugun E., Sargent E. H., Demir H. V.. Giant Alloyed Hot Injection Shells Enable Ultralow Optical Gain Threshold in Colloidal Quantum Wells. ACS Nano. 2019;13:10662–10670. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Duan R., Zhang Q., Thung Y. T., Zhou X., Yin T., Ao Y., Xiao L., Zhang Z., Lee C. X. X., Ren T.. et al. Continuous-Wave Pumped Self-Assembled Colloidal Topological Lasers. Adv. Mater. 2025;37:2416635. doi: 10.1002/adma.202416635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. She C., Fedin I., Dolzhnikov D. S., Demortière A., Schaller R. D., Pelton M., Talapin D. V.. Low-Threshold Stimulated Emission Using Colloidal Quantum Wells. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2772–2777. doi: 10.1021/nl500775p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li Q., Xu Z., McBride J. R., Lian T.. Low Threshold Multiexciton Optical Gain in Colloidal CdSe/CdTe Core/Crown Type-II Nanoplatelet Heterostructures. ACS Nano. 2017;11:2545–2553. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Guzelturk B., Pelton M., Olutas M., Demir H. V.. Giant Modal Gain Coefficients in Colloidal II-VI Nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 2019;19:277–282. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Abécassis B., Tessier M. D., Davidson P., Dubertret B.. Self-assembly of CdSe nanoplatelets into giant micrometer-scale needles emitting polarized light. Nano Lett. 2014;14:710–715. doi: 10.1021/nl4039746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Flórez F. G., Kulkarni A., Siebbeles L. D. A., Stoof H. T. C.. Explaining Observed Stability of Excitons in Highly Excited CdSe Nanoplatelets. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:245302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.245302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Flórez F. G., Siebbeles L. D. A., Stoof H. T. C.. Biexcitons in highly excited CdSe nanoplatelets. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;102:115302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.115302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zaslow B., Zandler M. E.. Two-Dimensional Analog to the Hydrogen Atom. Am. J. Phys. 1967;35:1118–1119. doi: 10.1119/1.1973790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. He X.-F.. Excitons in anisotropic solids: The model of fractional-dimensional space. Phys. Rev. B. 1991;43:2063. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kulik L. V., Kulakovskii V. D., Bayer M., Forchel A., Gippius N. A., Tikhodeev S. G.. Dielectric enhancement of excitons in near-surface quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54:R2335–R2338. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.R2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kumagai M., Takagahara T.. Excitonic and nonlinear-optical properties of dielectric quantum-well structures. Phys. Rev. B. 1989;40:12359–12381. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.12359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kleinman D. A.. Binding energy of biexcitons and bound excitons in quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B. 1983;28:871–879. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Birkedal D., Singh J., Lyssenko V. G., Erland J., Hvam J. M.. Binding of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Biexcitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;76:672–675. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Singh J., Birkedal D., Lyssenko V. G., Hvam J. M.. Binding energy of two-dimensional biexcitons. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;53:15909–15913. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.15909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li J., Luo L., Huang H., Ma C., Ye Z., Zeng J., He H.. 2D behaviors of excitons in cesium lead halide perovskite nanoplatelets. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:1161–1168. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vale B. R. C., Socie E., Burgos-Caminal A., Bettini J., Schiavon M. A., Moser J.-E.. Exciton, Biexciton, and Hot Exciton Dynamics in CsPbBr3 Colloidal Nanoplatelets. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020;11:387–394. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. You Y., Zhang X.-X., Berkelbach T. C., Hybertsen M. S., Reichman D. R., Heinz T. F.. Observation of biexcitons in monolayer WSe 2. Nat. Phys. 2015;11:477–481. doi: 10.1038/nphys3324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ithurria S., Tessier M. D., Mahler B., Lobo R. P. S. M., Dubertret B., Efros A. L.. Colloidal nanoplatelets with two-dimensional electronic structure. Nat. Mater. 2011;10:936–941. doi: 10.1038/nmat3145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Climente J. I., Movilla J. L., Planelles J.. Electronic Structure of Biexcitons in Metal Halide Perovskite Nanoplatelets. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024;15:7379–7386. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ma X., Diroll B. T., Cho W., Fedin I., Schaller R. D., Talapin D. V., Gray S. K., Wiederrecht G. P., Gosztola D. J.. Size-Dependent Biexciton Quantum Yields and Carrier Dynamics of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Core/Shell Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano. 2017;11:9119–9127. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Amgar D., Yang G., Tenne R., Oron D.. Higher-Order Photon Correlation as a Tool To Study Exciton Dynamics in Quasi-2D Nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 2019;19:8741–8748. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. D’Amato M., Fu N., Glorieux Q., Giacobino E., Le Jeannic H., Ithurria S., Lhuillier E., Bramati A.. Room-Temperature Efficient Single-Photon Generation from CdSe/ZnS Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano. 2025;19:14404–14409. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c01971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang S., Dyksik M., Lampe C., Gramlich M., Maude D. K., Baranowski M., Urban A. S., Plochocka P., Surrente A.. Thickness-Dependent Dark-Bright Exciton Splitting and Phonon Bottleneck in CsPbBr3-Based Nanoplatelets Revealed via Magneto-Optical Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2022;22:7011–7019. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Christodoulou S., Climente J. I., Planelles J., Brescia R., Prato M., Martin-Garcia B., Khan A. H., Moreels I.. Chloride-Induced Thickness Control in CdSe Nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 2018;18:6248–6254. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Li Y., Wang L., Xiang D., Zhu J., Wu K.. Dielectric and Wavefunction Engineering of Electron Spin Lifetime in Colloidal Nanoplatelet Heterostructures. Adv. Sci. 2024;11:2306518. doi: 10.1002/advs.202306518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhu C., Nguyen T., Boehme S. C., Moskalenko A., Dirin D. N., Bodnarchuk M. I., Katan C., Even J., Rainò G., Kovalenko M. V.. Many-Body Correlations and Exciton Complexes in CsPbBr Quantum Dots. Adv. Mater. 2023;35:2208354. doi: 10.1002/adma.202208354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Movilla J. L., Planelles J., Climente J. I.. Binding energy of polaronic trions and biexcitons in CsPbBr3 nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B. 2025;111:155304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.155304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nl5c03251_si_001.pdf (409.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Nano Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES