Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2025 Aug 12;81(Pt 9):821–826. doi: 10.1107/S2056989025006851

Crystal structure of bis­{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate

Kateryna Znovjyak a,*, Sergiu Shova b, Vazghen Nikolian c, Andrii Khairulin d, Igor O Fritsky a, Sergey O Malinkin a, Maksym Seredyuk a
Editor: C Schulzkee
PMCID: PMC12412702  PMID: 40918564

The neutral title compound bis­{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate has a distorted pseudo­octa­hedral coordination environment of the metal ion. As a result of their conical shape and polar nature, the mol­ecules stack in one-dimensional columns that are bound by weak hydrogen bonds into layers, which are arranged in three dimensions without inter­layer inter­actions below van der Waals radii.

Keywords: crystal structure, nickel(II) complexes, neutral complexes, tridentate ligands

Abstract

The unit cell of the title compound, [Ni(C17H11N6O2)2]·2CH3OH, consists of a neutral complex and two methanol mol­ecules. In the complex, the two tridentate 2-[3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]-6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine ligands coordinate to the central NiII ion through nitro­gen atoms of the pyrazole, pyridine and triazole groups, forming a pseudo­octa­hedral coordination sphere. Neighbouring mol­ecules are linked through weak C—H(pz)⋯π(ph) inter­actions into monoperiodic chains, which are further linked through weak C–H⋯H/N/C inter­actions into diperiodic layers. The inter­molecular contacts were qu­anti­fied using Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots, revealing the relative contributions of the contacts to the crystal packing to be H⋯H 38.4%, C⋯H/H⋯C 25.3%, N⋯H/H⋯N 14.1%, and O⋯H/H⋯O 11.8%. The average Ni—N bond distance is 2.085 Å. Energy framework analysis at the HF/3–21 G theory level was performed to qu­antify the inter­action energies in the crystal structure.

1. Chemical context

A broad class of coordination compounds is represented by 3d-metal complexes based on tridentate bis­azole­pyridine ligands (Halcrow et al., 2019; Suryadevara et al., 2022), which find application in many fields, for example in catalysis (Xing et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2015) and mol­ecular magnetism (Suryadevara et al., 2022). In the case of asymmetric ligand design, where one of the azole groups carries a hydrogen on a nitro­gen heteroatom and acts as a Brønsted acid, deprotonation can produce neutral complexes (Seredyuk et al., 2014; Grunwald et al., 2023). The periphery of the mol­ecule, i.e. ligand substituents, also plays an important role, determining the way the mol­ecules inter­act with each other, influencing the inter­molecular connectivity, inter­action energy and the organ­ization of the structure.1.

Encouraged by our results in spin-transition complexes of 3d-metals formed by N-heterocyclic ligands (Seredyuk et al., 2006, 2007a,b, 2024a; Piñeiro-López et al., 2018), we report here a new neutral NiII complex based on the asymmetric deprotonated ligand 2-[3-(benzo[d][1,3]diox­ol-5-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)-6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl]pyridine, which continues our lasting project on the study of 3d-metal complexes of bis­azole­pyridines and related organic polydentate ligands.

2. Structural commentary

The complex has a conical structure with the nickel(II) residing on twofold rotation axis and half of the formula in the asymmetric unit. The phenyl ring of the benzodioxole moiety of the ligand is rotated by 18.6 (1)° relative to the almost planar pyrazole-pyridine-triazole (pz-py-trz) fragment. The independent methanol mol­ecule forms an O—H⋯N hydrogen bond with the trz ring of the ligand mol­ecule (Fig. 1). The central Ni ion of the complex has a distorted octa­hedral N6 coordination environment formed by the nitro­gen donor atoms of the two tridentate ligands. The average Ni—N bond length is 2.085 Å. Distortion indices were calculated to assess how much the coordination polyhedron deviates from ideal octa­hedral geometry. The average trigonal distortion parameters Σ = Σ112(|90 − φi|), where φi refers to the twelve cis angles N—Ni—N′ (Drew et al., 1995), and Θ = Σ124(|60 − θi|), where θi is the angle generated by superposition of two opposite faces of an octa­hedron (Chang et al., 1990) are 117.2 and 391.6°, respectively. The values reveal a deviation of the coordination environment from an ideal octa­hedron (where Σ = Θ = 0), which is, however, in the expected range for bis­azole­pyridine and similar ligands (see below). The calculated continuous shape measure [CShM(Oh)] value relative to the ideal octa­hedral symmetry is 3.599 (Kershaw Cook et al., 2015). The volume of the [NiN6] coordination polyhedron is 11.431 Å3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure in the asymmetric unit of the title compound and contact atoms with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. The strong O—H⋯N (red) and weak C–H⋯N/C/O (cyan) hydrogen bonds are shown with the nearest neighbours. Symmetry codes: (i) 1 − x, 1 + y, Inline graphic − z; (ii) −Inline graphic + x, Inline graphic + y, Inline graphic − z; (iii) Inline graphic + x, −Inline graphic + y, Inline graphic − z; (iv) −Inline graphic + x, Inline graphic − y, 1 − z.

3. Supra­molecular features

Owing to the small head-group and large planar substituent at the tail, adjacent complex mol­ecules are inter­locked and inter­act via a weak, off-centre, almost perpendicular (83.6°) C—H(pz)⋯π(ph) inter­molecular contact between the pyrazole (pz) and phenyl (ph) groups with distances H2/C2⋯Cg(ph) = 2.68/3.580 (4) Å. The formed monoperiodic supra­molecular chains extend along the b-axis direction with the stacking periodicity equal to 10.4956 (4) Å (= cell parameter b) (Fig. 2). Through weak inter­molecular C—H(pz, py)⋯N/C inter­actions in the range 3.270 (4)–3.732 (5) Å (Table 1), neighbouring chains are joined into corrugated diperiodic layers in the ab plane. The layers stack without strong inter­layer inter­actions below the van der Waals radii; however, the solvent mol­ecules occupying voids between the layers participate in the bonding between separate layers. The methanol mol­ecule forms a strong O—H⋯N hydrogen bond with the deprotonated trz group and weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the CH2 group of the benzodioxole moiety belonging to a mol­ecule in a neighbouring chain. A list of the considered hydrogen-bonding inter­molecular inter­actions is provided in Table 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) A fragment of monoperiodic supra­molecular column formed by stacking of mol­ecules along the b axis; (b) supra­molecular diperiodic layers formed by stacking of the supra­molecular columns in the ab plane (for a better representation, each column has a different colour); (c) stacking of the diperiodic layers along the b-axis direction with the methanol mol­ecules in the voids.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯O3i 0.95 2.35 3.282 (5) 165
C5—H5⋯O3i 0.95 2.57 3.505 (4) 167
C7—H7⋯C1ii 0.95 2.68 3.605 (5) 163
C1—H1⋯N6iii 0.95 2.33 3.270 (4) 170
C17—H17A⋯C18iv 0.99 2.78 3.479 (7) 129
C17—H17A⋯O3iv 0.99 2.68 3.550 (6) 147
O3—H3A⋯N5 0.82 (4) 1.94 (4) 2.752 (4) 173 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

A Hirshfeld surface analysis was performed and the associated two-dimensional fingerprint plots were generated using CrystalExplorer 21.5 (Spackman et al., 2021), with a standard resolution of the three-dimensional dnorm surfaces (Fig. 3a). The pale-red spots symbolize short contacts and negative dnorm values on the surface corresponding to the inter­actions described above. The electrostatic potential energy calculated using the HF/3-21G basis set is mapped on the Hirshfeld surface (Fig. 3b). The negative charge localizes on the trz-ph moieties of the mol­ecules, while the pz-py moieties are relatively positively charged. The two-dimensional fingerprint plots, with their relative contributions to the Hirshfeld surface mapped over dnorm, are shown for the H⋯H, C⋯H/H⋯C, N⋯H/H⋯N and O⋯H/H⋯O contacts in Fig. 4. At 38.4%, the largest contribution to the overall crystal packing is from H⋯H inter­actions, which are located in the middle region of the fingerprint plot. C⋯H/H⋯C contacts contribute 25.3%, and O⋯H/H⋯O 11.8%, resulting in pairs of characteristic wings. The N⋯H/H⋯N contacts, represented by a pair of sharp spikes in the fingerprint plot, make a 14.1% contribution to the surface.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) A projection of dnorm mapped on the Hirshfeld surface identifying contact points or areas for inter­molecular inter­actions on the mol­ecule. Red/blue and white areas represent regions where contacts are shorter/larger than the sum and close to the sum of the van der Waals radii, respectively. (b) Electrostatic potential for the title compound mapped on the Hirshfeld surface. Red/blue and white areas represent regions where the charge is negative/positive or close to zero.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Decomposition of the two-dimensional fingerprint plot into specific inter­actions. (b) A projection of dnorm mapped on the Hirshfeld surfaces, showing the specific inter­molecular inter­actions on the mol­ecule.

The energy framework (Spackman et al., 2021), calculated using the wave function at the HF/3-21G theory level, including the electrostatic (Eele), polarization (Epol), dispersion (Edis), repulsion (Erep) forces, and the total energy diagrams (Etot), is shown in Fig. 5. The cylindrical radii, adjusted to the same scale factor of 100, are proportional to the relative strength of the corresponding energies. The major contribution is due to dispersion forces (Edis), reflecting dominating inter­actions in the crystal of the neutral mol­ecules. The topology of the energy framework resembles the topology of the inter­actions within and between layers described above. The calculated value Etot for the intra­chain inter­action is −50.5 kJ mol−1, and for inter­chain inter­actions is down to −95.8 kJ mol−1. The inter­layer inter­actions are represented by an energy of −19.8 kJ mol−1. The colour-coded inter­action mappings within a radius of 3.8 Å of a central reference mol­ecule together with full details of the various contributions to the total energy (Eele, Epol, Edis, Erep) are shown in the table in Fig. 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) The calculated energy frameworks, showing the total energy diagrams (Etot), (b) decomposition of the energy framework into the part corresponding to the inter­actions within a supra­molecular layer and (c) inter­layer inter­actions. In the table, the corresponding colour-coded energy values Etot are provided, including their Eele, Epol, Edis, and Erep components. Tube size is set at 100 scale.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.42, last update August 2024; Groom et al., 2016) reveals several similar neutral 3d MII complexes with tridentate bis­azolpyridine ligands with a deprotonable azole groups, for example, of NiII: YOCFAZ (Yuan et al., 2014), ZOCKOT (Xing et al., 2014), and ZOTVIP (Wei et al., 2015); of FeII: EGIDIL (Seredyuk et al., 2024b), LUTGEO (Senthil Kumar et al., 2015), and XODCEB (Shiga et al., 2019). In addition, there are related complexes based on phenanthroline-benzimidazole (DOMQUT; Seredyuk et al., 2014), di­pyridyl­pyrrol (NIRLOT; Grunwald et al., 2023). The values of the trigonal distortion and CShM(Oh) change in correspondence to the length of M—N distances, and for shorter distances they are systematically lower than for the longer distances. Table 2 collates some key structural parameters of the complexes and of the title compound.

Table 2. Computed distortion indices for the title compound and for similar complexes reported in the literature.

CSD Refcode Metal ion< <M—N> (Å) Σ (°) Θ (°) CShM(Oh)
Title compound Ni 2.085 117.2 391.6 3.60
YOCFAZ Ni 2.088a 120.8a 397.6a 3.65a
ZOCKOT Ni 2.086 121.0 375.9 3.78
ZOTVIP Ni 2.110 124.9 382.4 3.55
EGIDIL Fe 1.955 89.8 314.6 2.25
EGIDIL02 Fe 2.167 146.8 492.8 5.28
LUTGEO Fe 1.933 85.0 309.6 2.10
XODCEB Fe 1.950 87.4 276.6 1.93
DOMQUT Fe 1.991 88.5 320.0 2.48
DOMQUT02 Fe 2.183 139.6 486.9 5.31
NIRLOT Fe 1.939 77.3 255.6 1.68

Note: (a) average value.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The synthesis of the title compound is identical to that reported for a similar complex (Seredyuk et al., 2022). It was produced by using a layering technique in a standard test tube. The layering sequence was as follows: the bottom layer contained a solution of [Ni(L2)](ClO4)2 prepared by dissolving L = 2-[3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]-6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (88 mg, 0.274 mmol) and Ni(ClO4)2·6H2O (50 mg, 0.137 mmol) in boiling acetone (5 ml), to which chloro­form (5 ml) was then added. The middle layer was a methanol–chloro­form mixture (1:10) (10 ml), which was covered by a layer of methanol (10 ml) to which 100 µl of NEt3 were added dropwise. The tube was sealed and violet plate-like single crystals appeared after 2 weeks (yield ca. 58%). Elemental analysis calculated for C36H30N12NiO6: C, 55.05; H, 3.85; N, 21.40. Found: C, 55.66; H, 3.48; N, 21.61.

6. Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. The O-bound H atom was refined with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O); the hydrogen atom H3A was refined freely. All other H atoms were refined as riding [C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2–1.5Ueq(C)]. An attempt to model a potential disorder in the oxalan moiety was unsuccessful as it did not improve the refinement. One reflection (002), which was obscured by the beamstop, was omitted as clear outlier.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Ni(C17H11N6O2)2]·2CH4O
M r 785.42
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, Pbcn
Temperature (K) 200
a, b, c (Å) 12.7636 (4), 10.4956 (4), 26.5411 (12)
V3) 3555.5 (2)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.61
Crystal size (mm) 0.3 × 0.25 × 0.04
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Xcalibur, Eos
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2024)
Tmin, Tmax 0.982, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 12665, 3146, 2236
R int 0.060
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.595
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.053, 0.098, 1.04
No. of reflections 3146
No. of parameters 254
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.31, −0.35

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2024), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025006851/yz2071sup1.cif

e-81-00821-sup1.cif (544.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025006851/yz2071Isup2.hkl

e-81-00821-Isup2.hkl (251.7KB, hkl)
e-81-00821-Isup3.cdx (6.5KB, cdx)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025006851/yz2071Isup3.cdx

CCDC reference: 2477384

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the FAIRE programme provided by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) for the opportunity to use the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) and associated software. Author contributions are as follows: Conceptualization, KZ and MS; methodology, KZ; formal analysis, AK; synthesis, SOM; single-crystal measurements, SS; writing (original draft), KZ; writing (review and editing of the manuscript), VN, MS; visualization and calculations, KZ, IOF; funding acquisition, MS and KZ.

supplementary crystallographic information

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Crystal data

[Ni(C17H11N6O2)2]·2CH4O Dx = 1.467 Mg m3
Mr = 785.42 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pbcn Cell parameters from 2720 reflections
a = 12.7636 (4) Å θ = 2.2–25.8°
b = 10.4956 (4) Å µ = 0.61 mm1
c = 26.5411 (12) Å T = 200 K
V = 3555.5 (2) Å3 Plate, clear light violet
Z = 4 0.3 × 0.25 × 0.04 mm
F(000) = 1624

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Data collection

Xcalibur, Eos diffractometer 3146 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source 2236 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.060
Detector resolution: 16.1593 pixels mm-1 θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.2°
ω scans h = −10→15
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2024) k = −12→9
Tmin = 0.982, Tmax = 1.000 l = −19→31
12665 measured reflections

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.098 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0254P)2 + 2.476P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3146 reflections Δρmax = 0.31 e Å3
254 parameters Δρmin = −0.35 e Å3
0 restraints

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.500000 0.69588 (5) 0.750000 0.02073 (17)
N3 0.34364 (17) 0.7067 (2) 0.76431 (9) 0.0210 (6)
N6 0.29635 (19) 0.4568 (2) 0.67333 (11) 0.0294 (7)
O3 0.6459 (2) 0.5655 (3) 0.61469 (11) 0.0479 (8)
N4 0.43894 (17) 0.5611 (2) 0.70073 (10) 0.0235 (6)
N2 0.38524 (18) 0.8644 (2) 0.81994 (10) 0.0268 (7)
N1 0.48769 (18) 0.8386 (2) 0.80741 (10) 0.0246 (6)
N5 0.47127 (18) 0.4777 (2) 0.66463 (10) 0.0262 (7)
C4 0.3065 (2) 0.7917 (3) 0.79625 (12) 0.0251 (8)
C10 0.3842 (2) 0.4172 (3) 0.64927 (13) 0.0263 (8)
C7 0.1705 (2) 0.6386 (3) 0.74627 (15) 0.0388 (10)
H7 0.123624 0.584348 0.728607 0.047*
C9 0.3345 (2) 0.5459 (3) 0.70425 (13) 0.0245 (8)
O2 0.2148 (3) 0.0879 (3) 0.54493 (14) 0.0921 (12)
C6 0.1333 (2) 0.7279 (4) 0.77975 (15) 0.0431 (11)
H6 0.059945 0.735043 0.785111 0.052*
C5 0.2007 (2) 0.8075 (3) 0.80573 (13) 0.0363 (9)
H5 0.175702 0.869689 0.828819 0.044*
C12 0.2941 (3) 0.2482 (3) 0.60018 (15) 0.0412 (10)
H12 0.234731 0.254816 0.621630 0.049*
C11 0.3833 (2) 0.3232 (3) 0.60829 (13) 0.0290 (8)
C8 0.2776 (2) 0.6292 (3) 0.73882 (12) 0.0250 (8)
C3 0.3786 (3) 0.9550 (3) 0.85594 (14) 0.0380 (10)
H3 0.316294 0.988162 0.870435 0.046*
O1 0.3599 (3) 0.0627 (3) 0.49288 (12) 0.0741 (10)
C16 0.4691 (3) 0.3094 (3) 0.57656 (13) 0.0363 (9)
H16 0.529763 0.359884 0.582264 0.044*
C14 0.3798 (3) 0.1522 (4) 0.52947 (15) 0.0462 (10)
C15 0.4686 (3) 0.2229 (3) 0.53634 (15) 0.0452 (10)
H15 0.527454 0.213721 0.514753 0.054*
C2 0.4785 (3) 0.9895 (3) 0.86743 (15) 0.0406 (10)
H2 0.499792 1.051567 0.891392 0.049*
C13 0.2950 (3) 0.1662 (4) 0.56088 (16) 0.0485 (11)
C1 0.5433 (2) 0.9155 (3) 0.83694 (13) 0.0287 (8)
H1 0.617703 0.919390 0.837224 0.034*
C18 0.6032 (4) 0.6536 (4) 0.58103 (17) 0.0741 (15)
H18A 0.570036 0.608158 0.552967 0.111*
H18B 0.658810 0.708858 0.568045 0.111*
H18C 0.550579 0.705408 0.598456 0.111*
C17 0.2564 (4) 0.0181 (5) 0.5035 (2) 0.0920 (18)
H17A 0.211247 0.029769 0.473482 0.110*
H17B 0.258379 −0.073876 0.511717 0.110*
H3A 0.597 (3) 0.534 (4) 0.6305 (15) 0.048 (13)*

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.0147 (3) 0.0252 (3) 0.0223 (3) 0.000 0.0005 (3) 0.000
N3 0.0162 (13) 0.0235 (14) 0.0234 (17) 0.0020 (11) 0.0026 (11) −0.0039 (14)
N6 0.0246 (15) 0.0327 (17) 0.0310 (18) −0.0006 (12) −0.0024 (13) −0.0107 (15)
O3 0.0357 (16) 0.058 (2) 0.050 (2) 0.0056 (13) 0.0075 (14) 0.0173 (17)
N4 0.0220 (15) 0.0247 (15) 0.0237 (17) 0.0005 (11) 0.0009 (12) −0.0042 (14)
N2 0.0208 (15) 0.0291 (16) 0.0305 (18) 0.0003 (11) 0.0014 (12) −0.0093 (15)
N1 0.0169 (14) 0.0303 (15) 0.0265 (16) −0.0007 (11) 0.0048 (12) 0.0012 (13)
N5 0.0231 (15) 0.0283 (15) 0.0271 (18) 0.0007 (11) −0.0004 (12) −0.0063 (15)
C4 0.0186 (17) 0.0298 (19) 0.027 (2) 0.0004 (14) −0.0004 (14) −0.0028 (18)
C10 0.0264 (18) 0.0256 (19) 0.027 (2) 0.0039 (14) −0.0006 (15) 0.0003 (18)
C7 0.0173 (18) 0.049 (2) 0.051 (3) −0.0011 (14) 0.0014 (17) −0.020 (2)
C9 0.0190 (18) 0.0267 (19) 0.028 (2) −0.0011 (13) 0.0006 (14) −0.0016 (18)
O2 0.104 (3) 0.091 (3) 0.082 (3) −0.043 (2) −0.005 (2) −0.047 (2)
C6 0.0161 (18) 0.058 (3) 0.056 (3) 0.0009 (16) 0.0055 (17) −0.019 (2)
C5 0.0253 (19) 0.046 (2) 0.038 (2) 0.0009 (16) 0.0043 (16) −0.019 (2)
C12 0.044 (2) 0.041 (2) 0.039 (3) −0.0047 (17) −0.0009 (18) −0.013 (2)
C11 0.0362 (19) 0.0242 (19) 0.027 (2) 0.0044 (14) −0.0051 (16) −0.0002 (18)
C8 0.0214 (17) 0.0274 (18) 0.026 (2) −0.0009 (13) −0.0020 (14) −0.0039 (17)
C3 0.030 (2) 0.039 (2) 0.045 (3) 0.0021 (16) 0.0047 (17) −0.018 (2)
O1 0.122 (3) 0.054 (2) 0.047 (2) −0.0098 (19) −0.0071 (19) −0.0288 (19)
C16 0.045 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.031 (2) 0.0050 (16) −0.0009 (17) −0.003 (2)
C14 0.079 (3) 0.032 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.005 (2) −0.008 (2) −0.003 (2)
C15 0.064 (3) 0.040 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.0120 (19) 0.0068 (19) 0.000 (2)
C2 0.041 (2) 0.039 (2) 0.042 (3) −0.0059 (17) −0.0033 (18) −0.017 (2)
C13 0.066 (3) 0.036 (2) 0.044 (3) −0.0125 (19) −0.013 (2) −0.011 (2)
C1 0.0235 (17) 0.0300 (19) 0.033 (2) −0.0098 (14) −0.0064 (16) −0.0005 (19)
C18 0.113 (4) 0.058 (3) 0.051 (3) 0.032 (3) 0.026 (3) 0.011 (3)
C17 0.143 (5) 0.065 (4) 0.069 (4) −0.031 (4) −0.016 (4) −0.026 (3)

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ni1—N3i 2.035 (2) O2—C17 1.425 (5)
Ni1—N3 2.035 (2) C6—H6 0.9500
Ni1—N4i 2.078 (3) C6—C5 1.383 (4)
Ni1—N4 2.078 (3) C5—H5 0.9500
Ni1—N1 2.143 (3) C12—H12 0.9500
Ni1—N1i 2.143 (3) C12—C11 1.401 (4)
N3—C4 1.319 (4) C12—C13 1.353 (5)
N3—C8 1.353 (4) C11—C16 1.389 (4)
N6—C10 1.356 (4) C3—H3 0.9500
N6—C9 1.336 (4) C3—C2 1.360 (4)
O3—C18 1.396 (5) O1—C14 1.375 (4)
O3—H3A 0.82 (3) O1—C17 1.430 (5)
N4—N5 1.362 (3) C16—H16 0.9500
N4—C9 1.345 (3) C16—C15 1.401 (5)
N2—N1 1.376 (3) C14—C15 1.366 (5)
N2—C4 1.410 (4) C14—C13 1.374 (5)
N2—C3 1.350 (4) C15—H15 0.9500
N1—C1 1.330 (4) C2—H2 0.9500
N5—C10 1.343 (4) C2—C1 1.394 (5)
C4—C5 1.383 (4) C1—H1 0.9500
C10—C11 1.468 (4) C18—H18A 0.9800
C7—H7 0.9500 C18—H18B 0.9800
C7—C6 1.376 (5) C18—H18C 0.9800
C7—C8 1.385 (4) C17—H17A 0.9900
C9—C8 1.461 (4) C17—H17B 0.9900
O2—C13 1.379 (4)
N3i—Ni1—N3 173.57 (14) C4—C5—H5 121.8
N3—Ni1—N4 77.75 (10) C6—C5—C4 116.3 (3)
N3—Ni1—N4i 106.77 (10) C6—C5—H5 121.8
N3i—Ni1—N4 106.77 (9) C11—C12—H12 121.0
N3i—Ni1—N4i 77.75 (9) C13—C12—H12 121.0
N3—Ni1—N1 75.88 (9) C13—C12—C11 118.0 (4)
N3—Ni1—N1i 99.53 (9) C12—C11—C10 119.8 (3)
N3i—Ni1—N1i 75.88 (9) C16—C11—C10 120.9 (3)
N3i—Ni1—N1 99.53 (9) C16—C11—C12 119.3 (3)
N4—Ni1—N4i 94.21 (14) N3—C8—C7 120.0 (3)
N4—Ni1—N1 153.63 (9) N3—C8—C9 111.4 (3)
N4i—Ni1—N1i 153.63 (9) C7—C8—C9 128.6 (3)
N4—Ni1—N1i 93.21 (10) N2—C3—H3 126.6
N4i—Ni1—N1 93.21 (10) N2—C3—C2 106.7 (3)
N1—Ni1—N1i 91.26 (14) C2—C3—H3 126.6
C4—N3—Ni1 120.7 (2) C14—O1—C17 104.8 (3)
C4—N3—C8 120.3 (3) C11—C16—H16 119.2
C8—N3—Ni1 118.9 (2) C11—C16—C15 121.7 (3)
C9—N6—C10 101.7 (2) C15—C16—H16 119.2
C18—O3—H3A 107 (3) C15—C14—O1 128.2 (4)
N5—N4—Ni1 140.06 (18) C15—C14—C13 121.0 (4)
C9—N4—Ni1 114.1 (2) C13—C14—O1 110.9 (4)
C9—N4—N5 105.8 (2) C16—C15—H15 121.4
N1—N2—C4 117.6 (2) C14—C15—C16 117.2 (4)
C3—N2—N1 111.6 (2) C14—C15—H15 121.4
C3—N2—C4 130.7 (3) C3—C2—H2 126.9
N2—N1—Ni1 112.28 (18) C3—C2—C1 106.1 (3)
C1—N1—Ni1 143.5 (2) C1—C2—H2 126.9
C1—N1—N2 104.2 (3) C12—C13—O2 127.6 (4)
C10—N5—N4 105.5 (2) C12—C13—C14 122.8 (4)
N3—C4—N2 113.3 (2) C14—C13—O2 109.6 (4)
N3—C4—C5 123.3 (3) N1—C1—C2 111.3 (3)
C5—C4—N2 123.3 (3) N1—C1—H1 124.4
N6—C10—C11 123.3 (3) C2—C1—H1 124.4
N5—C10—N6 113.3 (3) O3—C18—H18A 109.5
N5—C10—C11 123.3 (3) O3—C18—H18B 109.5
C6—C7—H7 120.6 O3—C18—H18C 109.5
C6—C7—C8 118.8 (3) H18A—C18—H18B 109.5
C8—C7—H7 120.6 H18A—C18—H18C 109.5
N6—C9—N4 113.7 (3) H18B—C18—H18C 109.5
N6—C9—C8 128.6 (3) O2—C17—O1 109.1 (4)
N4—C9—C8 117.7 (3) O2—C17—H17A 109.9
C13—O2—C17 105.5 (4) O2—C17—H17B 109.9
C7—C6—H6 119.4 O1—C17—H17A 109.9
C7—C6—C5 121.2 (3) O1—C17—H17B 109.9
C5—C6—H6 119.4 H17A—C17—H17B 108.3
Ni1—N3—C4—N2 −3.3 (4) C10—C11—C16—C15 −178.1 (3)
Ni1—N3—C4—C5 176.9 (3) C7—C6—C5—C4 −0.2 (6)
Ni1—N3—C8—C7 −177.2 (3) C9—N6—C10—N5 0.3 (4)
Ni1—N3—C8—C9 0.9 (3) C9—N6—C10—C11 −176.1 (3)
Ni1—N4—N5—C10 178.3 (3) C9—N4—N5—C10 −0.6 (3)
Ni1—N4—C9—N6 −178.4 (2) C6—C7—C8—N3 0.2 (5)
Ni1—N4—C9—C8 3.8 (4) C6—C7—C8—C9 −177.5 (3)
Ni1—N1—C1—C2 179.5 (3) C12—C11—C16—C15 0.4 (5)
N3—C4—C5—C6 0.3 (5) C11—C12—C13—O2 −177.2 (4)
N6—C10—C11—C12 −15.0 (5) C11—C12—C13—C14 1.1 (6)
N6—C10—C11—C16 163.5 (3) C11—C16—C15—C14 0.0 (5)
N6—C9—C8—N3 179.5 (3) C8—N3—C4—N2 179.7 (3)
N6—C9—C8—C7 −2.6 (6) C8—N3—C4—C5 −0.1 (5)
N4—N5—C10—N6 0.2 (4) C8—C7—C6—C5 0.0 (6)
N4—N5—C10—C11 176.5 (3) C3—N2—N1—Ni1 −179.7 (2)
N4—C9—C8—N3 −3.1 (4) C3—N2—N1—C1 0.3 (3)
N4—C9—C8—C7 174.8 (3) C3—N2—C4—N3 −176.7 (3)
N2—N1—C1—C2 −0.4 (4) C3—N2—C4—C5 3.1 (6)
N2—C4—C5—C6 −179.5 (3) C3—C2—C1—N1 0.4 (4)
N2—C3—C2—C1 −0.2 (4) O1—C14—C15—C16 179.4 (3)
N1—N2—C4—N3 −0.2 (4) O1—C14—C13—O2 −1.6 (5)
N1—N2—C4—C5 179.6 (3) O1—C14—C13—C12 179.9 (4)
N1—N2—C3—C2 −0.1 (4) C14—O1—C17—O2 3.1 (5)
N5—N4—C9—N6 0.8 (4) C15—C14—C13—O2 177.9 (4)
N5—N4—C9—C8 −176.9 (3) C15—C14—C13—C12 −0.7 (6)
N5—C10—C11—C12 169.0 (3) C13—O2—C17—O1 −4.1 (5)
N5—C10—C11—C16 −12.5 (5) C13—C12—C11—C10 177.6 (3)
C4—N3—C8—C7 −0.1 (5) C13—C12—C11—C16 −1.0 (5)
C4—N3—C8—C9 177.9 (3) C13—C14—C15—C16 0.1 (6)
C4—N2—N1—Ni1 3.2 (3) C17—O2—C13—C12 −178.1 (4)
C4—N2—N1—C1 −176.8 (3) C17—O2—C13—C14 3.4 (5)
C4—N2—C3—C2 176.6 (3) C17—O1—C14—C15 179.6 (4)
C10—N6—C9—N4 −0.7 (4) C17—O1—C14—C13 −1.0 (5)
C10—N6—C9—C8 176.8 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+3/2.

Bis{3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}nickel(II) methanol disolvate . Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C3—H3···O3ii 0.95 2.35 3.282 (5) 165
C5—H5···O3ii 0.95 2.57 3.505 (4) 167
C7—H7···C1iii 0.95 2.68 3.605 (5) 163
C1—H1···N6iv 0.95 2.33 3.270 (4) 170
C17—H17A···C18v 0.99 2.78 3.479 (7) 129
C17—H17A···O3v 0.99 2.68 3.550 (6) 147
O3—H3A···N5 0.82 (4) 1.94 (4) 2.752 (4) 173 (4)

Symmetry codes: (ii) x−1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (iii) x−1/2, y−1/2, −z+3/2; (iv) x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (v) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D–H···A D–H H···A D···A D–H···A
C3–H···O3ii 0.95 2.36 3.282 (5) 165
C5–H···O3ii 0.95 2.57 3.505 (4) 167
C7–H···C1iii 0.95 2.68 3.605 (5) 163
N6···H–C1iii 0.95 2.33 3.270 (4) 170
C17–H···C18iv 0.99 2.78 3.479 (7) 129
C17–H···O3iv 0.99 2.68 3.550 (6) 147
O3–H···N6 0.82 1.94 2.753 (4) 172

Symmetry codes: (i) 1-x,1+y,1.5-z; (ii) -1/2+x,1/2+y,1.5-z; (iii) -1/2+x,-1/2+y,1.5-z; (iv) -1/2+x,1/2-y,1-z

Funding Statement

Funding for this research was provided by grant No. 24BF037-03 from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. This work was supported by the European Union’s HORIZON-MSCA-2023-SE-01 programme under grant agreement No. 101183082 – PacemCAT.

References

  1. Chang, H. R., McCusker, J. K., Toftlund, H., Wilson, S. R., Trautwein, A. X., Winkler, H. & Hendrickson, D. N. (1990). J. Am. Chem. Soc.112, 6814–6827.
  2. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst.42, 339–341.
  3. Drew, M. G. B., Harding, C. J., McKee, V., Morgan, G. G. & Nelson, J. (1995). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. pp. 1035–1038.
  4. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Grunwald, J., Torres, J., Buchholz, A., Näther, C., Kämmerer, L., Gruber, M., Rohlf, S., Thakur, S., Wende, H., Plass, W., Kuch, W. & Tuczek, F. (2023). Chem. Sci.14, 7361–7380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Halcrow, M. A., Capel Berdiell, I., Pask, C. M. & Kulmaczewski, R. (2019). Inorg. Chem.58, 9811–9821. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Kershaw Cook, L. J., Mohammed, R., Sherborne, G., Roberts, T. D., Alvarez, S. & Halcrow, M. A. (2015). Coord. Chem. Rev.289–290, 2–12.
  8. Piñeiro-López, L., Valverde-Muñoz, F. J., Seredyuk, M., Bartual-Murgui, C., Muñoz, M. C. & Real, J. A. (2018). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 289–296. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Rigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO . Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.
  10. Senthil Kumar, K., Šalitroš, I., Heinrich, B., Fuhr, O. & Ruben, M. (2015). J. Mater. Chem. C.3, 11635–11644.
  11. Seredyuk, M., Gaspar, A. B., Ksenofontov, V., Reiman, S., Galyametdinov, Y., Haase, W., Rentschler, E. & Gütlich, P. (2006). Hyperfine Interact.166, 385–390.
  12. Seredyuk, M., Gaspar, A. B., Kusz, J., Bednarek, G. & Gütlich, P. (2007a). J. Appl. Cryst.40, 1135–1145.
  13. Seredyuk, M., Haukka, M., Fritsky, I. O., Kozłowski, H., Krämer, R., Pavlenko, V. A. & Gütlich, P. (2007b). Dalton Trans. pp. 3183–3194. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Seredyuk, M., Li, R., Znovjyak, K., Zhang, Z., Valverde–Muñoz, F. J., Li, B., Muñoz, M. C., Li, Q., Liu, B., Levchenko, G. & Real, J. A. (2024a). Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2315487.
  15. Seredyuk, M., Znovjyak, K., Valverde-Muñoz, F. J., da Silva, I., Muñoz, M. C., Moroz, Y. S. & Real, J. A. (2022). J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 14297–14309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Seredyuk, M., Znovjyak, K., Valverde-Muñoz, F. J., Muñoz, M. C., Fritsky, I. O. & Real, J. A. (2024b). Dalton Trans.53, 8041–8049. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Seredyuk, M., Znovjyak, K. O., Kusz, J., Nowak, M., Muñoz, M. C. & Real, J. A. (2014). Dalton Trans.43, 16387–16394. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  19. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  20. Shiga, T., Saiki, R., Akiyama, L., Kumai, R., Natke, D., Renz, F., Cameron, J. M., Newton, G. N. & Oshio, H. (2019). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 5658–5662. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst.54, 1006–1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Suryadevara, N., Mizuno, A., Spieker, L., Salamon, S., Sleziona, S., Maas, A., Pollmann, E., Heinrich, B., Schleberger, M., Wende, H., Kuppusamy, S. K. & Ruben, M. (2022). Chem. A Eur. J.28, e202103853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Wei, S. Y., Wang, J. L., Zhang, C. S., Xu, X.-T., Zhang, X. X., Wang, J. X. & Xing, Y.-H. (2015). ChemPlusChem80, 549-558. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Xing, N., Xu, L. T., Liu, X., Wu, Q., Ma, X. T. & Xing, Y. H. (2014). ChemPlusChem79, 1198-1207.
  25. Yuan, L.-Z., Ge, Q., Zhao, X.-F., Ouyang, Y., Li, S.-H., Xie, C.-Z. & Xu, J.-Y. (2014). Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Nano-Met. Chem.44, 1175–1182.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025006851/yz2071sup1.cif

e-81-00821-sup1.cif (544.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025006851/yz2071Isup2.hkl

e-81-00821-Isup2.hkl (251.7KB, hkl)
e-81-00821-Isup3.cdx (6.5KB, cdx)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025006851/yz2071Isup3.cdx

CCDC reference: 2477384

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES