Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Dec;110(Suppl 6):965–970. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s6965

Evaluating quantitative formulas for dose-response assessment of chemical mixtures.

Richard C Hertzberg 1, Linda K Teuschler 1
PMCID: PMC1241279  PMID: 12634126

Abstract

Risk assessment formulas are often distinguished from dose-response models by being rough but necessary. The evaluation of these rough formulas is described here, using the example of mixture risk assessment. Two conditions make the dose-response part of mixture risk assessment difficult, lack of data on mixture dose-response relationships, and the need to address risk from combinations of chemicals because of public demands and statutory requirements. Consequently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has developed methods for carrying out quantitative dose-response assessment for chemical mixtures that require information only on the toxicity of single chemicals and of chemical pair interactions. These formulas are based on plausible ideas and default parameters but minimal supporting data on whole mixtures. Because of this lack of mixture data, the usual evaluation of accuracy (predicted vs. observed) cannot be performed. Two approaches to the evaluation of such formulas are to consider fundamental biological concepts that support the quantitative formulas (e.g., toxicologic similarity) and to determine how well the proposed method performs under simplifying constraints (e.g., as the toxicologic interactions disappear). These ideas are illustrated using dose addition and two weight-of-evidence formulas for incorporating toxicologic interactions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (154.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berenbaum M. C. What is synergy? Pharmacol Rev. 1989 Jun;41(2):93–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Greco W. R., Bravo G., Parsons J. C. The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective. Pharmacol Rev. 1995 Jun;47(2):331–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hertzberg Richard C., MacDonell Margaret M. Synergy and other ineffective mixture risk definitions. Sci Total Environ. 2002 Apr 8;288(1-2):31–42. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01113-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mumtaz M. M., Durkin P. R. A weight-of-evidence approach for assessing interactions in chemical mixtures. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Nov-Dec;8(6):377–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Teuschler L. K., Gennings C., Stiteler W. M., Hertzberg R. C., Colman J. T., Thiyagarajah A., Lipscomb J. C., Hartley W. R., Simmons J. E. A multiple-purpose design approach to the evaluation of risks from mixtures of disinfection by-products. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2000 Feb;23(1):307–321. doi: 10.1081/dct-100100117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. el-Masri H. A., Thomas R. S., Benjamin S. A., Yang R. S. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of chemical mixtures and possible applications in risk assessment. Toxicology. 1995 Dec 28;105(2-3):275–282. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(95)03222-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES