Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Feb;111(2):133–137. doi: 10.1289/ehp.4477

Ethical perspectives for public and environmental health: fostering autonomy and the right to know.

Timothy William Lambert 1, Colin L Soskolne 1, Vangie Bergum 1, James Howell 1, John B Dossetor 1
PMCID: PMC1241339  PMID: 12573894

Abstract

In this paper we develop an ethical perspective for public and environmental health practice in consideration of the "right to know" by contrasting consequential and deontological perspectives with relational ethics grounded in the concept of fostering autonomy. From the consequential perspective, disclosure of public and environmental health risks to the public depends on the expected or possible consequences. We discuss three major concerns with this perspective: respect for persons, justice, and ignorance. From a deontological perspective, the "right to know" means that there is a "duty" to communicate about all public health risks and consideration of the principles of prevention, precaution, and environmental justice. Relational ethics develops from consideration of a mutual limitation of the traditional perspectives. Relational ethics is grounded in the relationship between the public and public/environmental health providers. In this paper we develop a model for this relationship, which we call "fostering autonomy through mutually respectful relationships." Fostering autonomy is both an end in public health practice and a means to promote the principles of prevention, precaution, and environmental justice. We discuss these principles as they relate to practical issues of major disasters and contaminants in food, such as DDT, toxaphene, chlordane, and mercury.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (292.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chan H. M., Berti P. R., Receveur O., Kuhnlein H. V. Evaluation of the population distribution of dietary contaminant exposure in an Arctic population using Monte Carlo statistics. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Mar;105(3):316–321. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clarkson Thomas W. The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Feb;110 (Suppl 1):11–23. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dhara V. Ramana, Dhara Rosaline, Acquilla Sushma D., Cullinan Paul. Personal exposure and long-term health effects in survivors of the union carbide disaster at bhopal. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 May;110(5):487–500. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HILL A. B. THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION? Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58:295–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hook G. E., Lucier G. W. The right to know is for everyone. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Apr;108(4):A160–A161. doi: 10.1289/ehp.108-a160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KAY K. Health problems of the new organic insecticides. Can J Public Health. 1950 Sep;41(9):374–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kosatsky T., Foran P. Do historic studies of fish consumers support the widely accepted LOEL for methylmercury in adults. Neurotoxicology. 1996 Spring;17(1):177–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kriebel D., Tickner J., Epstein P., Lemons J., Levins R., Loechler E. L., Quinn M., Rudel R., Schettler T., Stoto M. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Sep;109(9):871–876. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laine C., Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996 Jan 10;275(2):152–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee Charles. Environmental justice: building a unified vision of health and the environment. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 (Suppl 2):141–144. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Macdonal R. W., Barrie L. A., Bidleman T. F., Diamond M. L., Gregor D. J., Semkin R. G., Strachan W. M., Li Y. F., Wania F., Alaee M. Contaminants in the Canadian Arctic: 5 years of progress in understanding sources, occurrence and pathways. Sci Total Environ. 2000 Jun 1;254(2-3):93–234. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00434-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McLeod H. A., Grant D. L., Phillips W. E. Pesticide residues and metabolites in placentas. Can J Public Health. 1971 Jul-Aug;62(4):341–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pellegrino E. D. The metamorphosis of medical ethics. A 30-year retrospective. JAMA. 1993 Mar 3;269(9):1158–1162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perlin S. A., Wong D., Sexton K. Residential proximity to industrial sources of air pollution: interrelationships among race, poverty, and age. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Mar;51(3):406–421. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. READ S. T., McKINLEY W. P. DDT and DDE content of human fat. A survey. Arch Environ Health. 1961 Aug;3:209–211. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1961.10663005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rice D. C. Neurotoxicity of lead, methylmercury, and PCBs in relation to the Great Lakes. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Dec;103 (Suppl 9):71–87. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwenger C. W. Public or community health? Can J Public Health. 1973 Mar;64(2):117–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tenenbaum D. J. Northern overexposure. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Feb;106(2):A64–A69. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106a64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wheatley B., Paradis S. Balancing human exposure, risk and reality: questions raised by the Canadian aboriginal methylmercury program. Neurotoxicology. 1996 Spring;17(1):241–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES