Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Feb;111(2):221–222. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5701

Animal models to detect allergenicity to foods and genetically modified products: workshop summary.

Helen Tryphonas 1, George Arvanitakis 1, Elizabeth Vavasour 1, Genevieve Bondy 1
PMCID: PMC1241354  PMID: 12573909

Abstract

Respiratory allergy and allergy to foods continue to be important health issues. There is evidence to indicate that the incidence of food allergy around the world is on the rise. Current estimates indicate that approximately 5% of young children and 1-2% of adults suffer from true food allergy (Kagan 2003). Although a large number of in vivo and in vitro tests exist for the clinical diagnosis of allergy in humans, we lack validated animal models of allergenicity. This deficiency creates serious problems for regulatory agencies and industries that must define the potential allergenicity of foods before marketing. The emergence of several biotechnologically derived foods and industrial proteins, as well as their potential to sensitize genetically predisposed populations to develop allergy, has prompted health officials and regulatory agencies around the world to seek approaches and methodologies to screen novel proteins for allergenicity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (620.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chapoval Svetlana P., David Chella S. Identification of antigenic epitopes on human allergens: studies with HLA transgenic mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Feb;111(2):245–250. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Helm Ricki M., Ermel Richard W., Frick Oscar L. Nonmurine animal models of food allergy. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Feb;111(2):239–244. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kagan Rhoda Sheryl. Food allergy: an overview. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Feb;111(2):223–225. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kimber Ian, Stone Sue, Dearman Rebecca J. Assessment of the inherent allergenic potential of proteins in mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Feb;111(2):227–231. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knippels Léon M. J., Penninks André H. Assessment of the allergic potential of food protein extracts and proteins on oral application using the brown Norway rat model. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Feb;111(2):233–238. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Metcalfe D. D., Astwood J. D., Townsend R., Sampson H. A., Taylor S. L., Fuchs R. L. Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1996;36 (Suppl):S165–S186. doi: 10.1080/10408399609527763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stickler Marcia, Mucha Jeanette, Estell David, Power Scott, Harding Fiona. A human dendritic cell-based method to identify CD4+ T-cell epitopes in potential protein allergens. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Feb;111(2):251–254. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES