Skip to main content
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) logoLink to Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
. 2025 Sep 2;19:3167–3176. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S540589

Vision-Related Quality of Life Outcomes Following Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in Chronic Dacryocystitis: A Prospective Cohort Study

Xinyu Zheng 1,*, Xinyue Yu 1,*, Kerui Wang 1, Ziwei Meng 1, Can Yang 1, Jiayi Zhang 1, Jing Zhao 1, Chengzhen Gong 1, Rongxin Chen 1, Zuohong Li 1,, Xuanwei Liang 1
PMCID: PMC12413819  PMID: 40917270

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to assess the vision-related quality of life in patients with chronic dacryocystitis (CD) and to investigate the impact of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) and the timing of the procedure on patients’ quality of life.

Methods

A prospective cohort of 57 patients diagnosed with chronic dacryocystitis and scheduled for surgical intervention between August 2023 and December 2023 was initially recruited, with 54 patients completing the entire follow-up period. A control group consisting of 69 healthy individuals, matched for age and sex, was also included. The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was employed to compare the preoperative visual function questionnaire (VFQ) scores between the patient group and the control group.

Results

The study demonstrated that the VQF score in the preoperative patient cohort was significantly lower than that of the control group (p<0.0001). This disparity was primarily observed in the domains of eye pain (p=0.0053), distance activities (p=0.0251), role difficulties (p=0.0280), and mental health (p=0.0044). Postoperative VQF scores exhibited significant improvement compared to preoperative scores (p<0.05), with the change in VQF score showing a negative correlation with the duration of the disease (p<0.0001, r=−0.6634). Furthermore, no significant difference in VQF scores was observed between the catheterized and non-catheterized groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion

The study found that patients with chronic dacryocystitis experience a significant reduction in vision-related quality of life. The En-DCR procedure effectively alleviates symptoms in CD patients and enhances their vision-related quality of life, with earlier surgical intervention leading to greater improvements.

Keywords: vision-related quality of life, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, chronic dacryocystitis

Introduction

Chronic dacryocystitis (CD), primarily resulting from primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO), is a prevalent ocular inflammatory condition and a common ophthalmological and nasal-related disorder. Symptoms of CD typically include excessive tearing, purulent discharge, skin swelling in the dacryocyst area, and pain, predominantly affecting women aged 40–60 years.1,2 These symptoms frequently impact patients’ daily lives and diminish their quality of life.

Clinically, it has been observed that patients often exhibit severe symptoms and experience disease courses that may persist for several months or even years when they seek medical treatment. Currently, the pathogenesis of PANDO remains unclear, and there is no effective pharmacological treatment available; thus, surgical intervention is the primary therapeutic approach.3,4 Presently, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) has emerged as the preferred surgical technique for managing PANDO.5–7

Quality of life is defined as individuals’ subjective assessment of their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns within different cultural and value systems. Over the past few decades, vision-related quality of life has garnered increasing attention.8,9 Considering the essential role of vision in everyday activities,10 the symptoms of chronic dacryocystitis (especially excessive tearing) can greatly impair visual clarity and negatively impact overall quality of life. Our previous study has demonstrated that when lacrimal duct obstruction occurs, patients exhibit an excessive production of tears, known as epiphora, which disrupts the stability of the tear film on the ocular surface and may consequently impair visual acuity.11 The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) is a widely utilized instrument for evaluating vision-related health status and quality of life in individuals with chronic ocular conditions, including cataracts, glaucoma, corneal transplantation, and various surgical interventions.12 Research has also been conducted on its applicability to macular disease, diabetic retinopathy, Graves’ ophthalmopathy, immune-mediated eye disorders, cytomegalovirus retinitis, and other chronic ocular diseases.13–15 The NEI-VFQ-25 effectively captures patients’ psychological states, social functioning, and levels of dependency, demonstrating its broad applicability. Consequently, it has been extensively translated into numerous languages and has been the subject of studies in China.16

Given that CD significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, analyzing the improvement in vision-related quality of life and associated factors before and after En-DCR surgery is of considerable importance.

Method

Participants

This study prospectively enrolled 57 patients diagnosed with CD who were scheduled to undergo En-DCR between August 2023 and December 2023. All surgeries were performed according to the standard En-DCR procedure and were performed by the same senior oculoplastic surgeon. Patients with concurrent ocular diseases affecting visual quality, significant systemic illnesses, inability to cooperate with examinations and surgical procedures, or psychiatric disorders were excluded from the study. Upon enrollment, detailed demographic and clinical information, including gender, age, and disease duration, were meticulously recorded. Comprehensive preoperative assessments were conducted at our institution. Ultimately, 54 patients completed the entire follow-up period, after accounting for those lost to follow-up. With the assistance of local community workers, individuals of the same age and gender who did not have other diseases affecting their quality of life were selected. Concurrently, a control group representative of the general population, matched for age and gender distribution, was established via a home-based questionnaire survey after obtaining informed consent.17

The main project to which this study belongs followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Eye Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (2021KYPJ100), which has obtained written informed consent from the participants. The content of this study has been covered by the main project, and the collection of data through questionnaires with the patients’ consent does not impose any additional risk on the treatment of the individuals involved.

Diagnosis of Disease

CD typically arises secondary to nasolacrimal duct obstruction, leading to tear retention within the lacrimal sac and subsequent bacterial infection. The diagnosis of chronic dacryocystitis was confirmed through lacrimal duct irrigation18 and computed tomography dacryocystography (CT-DCG),19 in conjunction with clinical manifestations.

Method of Assessment of Vision-Related Quality of Life

The NEI-VFQ-25 is a widely employed, comprehensive instrument designed to assess vision-related health status and quality of life in individuals with chronic eye conditions. It consists of 25 single-choice items that address 12 dimensions of vision-related quality of life, including general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, peripheral vision, social functioning, color vision, driving, role difficulties, dependency, and mental health. Each item provides 5–6 response options, corresponding to a score ranging from 0 to 100. All dimensions are equally weighted in the calculation of the overall score, with higher scores indicating an enhanced visual quality of life.20,21 The scale’s universality has facilitated its translation into multiple languages including Chinese for widespread application.

The scale’s broad applicability has enabled its translation into several languages, including Chinese, for extensive use. This study employed the NEI-VFQ-25 to evaluate vision-related quality of life in patients with CD. Assessments were conducted using questionnaires at four time points: prior to surgery, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery. All questionnaires were recorded by the researchers after they asked the participants in detail. The general methodology of this study is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

This figure shows the general process of this research.

Evaluation of Operative Effect

The impact of the surgical intervention will be assessed six months post-operation. Currently, the efficacy of En-DCR in China is evaluated using the criteria established by Zhou Bing and Tang Xin, which categorize outcomes into three levels: cured, improved, and ineffective. The criteria for determining curative effect are as follows: 1) Cured: the patient exhibits no symptoms of excessive tearing or pus secretion; 2) Improved: the patient continues to experience epiphora but without symptoms of pus secretion; 3) Ineffective: the patient persists with symptoms of both epiphora and pus secretion.22

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables following a normal distribution are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables are expressed as rates and constituent ratios. The t-test was employed to assess differences in the Visual Quality of Life (VQF) scores before and after surgery, which was normal distribution. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was utilized to examine the relationship between the duration of the disease and changes in VQF scores. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance. For missing data resulting from loss to follow-up, this sample will be excluded from the final statistical analysis.

Result

Basic Information

In this study, 57 patients with unilateral chronic dacryocystitis were initially enrolled. However, 3 patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 54 patients completing all follow-up assessments. Baseline characteristics of these patients are presented in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 51.39±9.35 years, with an average disease duration of 41.09±62.62 months. The cohort included 7 males and 47 females. Surgical outcomes were assessed at a six-month postoperative review, revealing that 34 patients were cured, 16 showed improvement, and 4 exhibited no effect. Of these, 40 patients underwent intraoperative intubation, while 14 did not. Additionally, a control group, matched for age and sex ratio, was included, consisting of 69 participants (10 males and 59 females) with a mean age of 49.26±6.01 years. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in age and sex ratio between the control and patient groups (p > 0.05).

Table 1.

Baseline Data of Enrolled Patients

Parameters
Total, N 54
Age, Y 51.39±9.35
Course of disease, M 41.09±62.62
Sex, N (%)
 Male 7 (12.96)
 Female 47 (87.04)
Surgical eye, N (%)
 Right eye 29 (53.70)
 Left eye 25 (46.30)
Symptoms, N (%)
 Tear 9 (16.67)
 Tear+secretion 45 (83.33)
Operative effect, N (%)
 Cured 34 (62.96)
 Improved 16 (29.63)
 Ineffective 4 (7.41)
Intraoperative intubation, N (%)
 Yes 40 (74.07)
 No 14 (25.93)

Note: The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or n (%) for each parameter.

Differences in Vision-Related Quality of Life Between Preoperative Patients and the Normal Population

The comparative analysis of vision-related quality of life between the preoperative patient group and the control group revealed significant differences in individual scores (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). Specifically, the patient group exhibited markedly lower scores than the control group across four domains: ocular pain (p = 0.0053), distance activities (p = 0.0251), role difficulties (p = 0.0280), and mental health (p = 0.0044).

Table 2.

Comparison of VQF Scores Between Preoperative Patient Group and Control Group

Rated Items Control Patients P Value
Overall score 84.29±8.13 74.17±11.81 <0.0001*
General health 52.33±20.20 54.44±24.60 0.1974
General vision 57.33±15.52 53.63±23.13 0.9730
Ocular pain 90.67±14.10 79.44±24.18 0.0053*
Near activities 84.44±15.40 85.01±17.13 0.5142
Distance activities 88.67±16.27 90.79±14.46 0.0251*
Peripheral vision 88.67±17.58 91.53±16.29 0.2029
Social functioning 93.50±11.69 95.97±9.542 0.0941
Color vision 98.67±5.66 97.58±7.452 0.7220
Driving 89.78±13.10 88.54±17.83 0.6837
Role difficulties 85.56±17.35 81.18±22.48 0.0280*
Dependency 92.78±14.06 86.69±21.58 0.4618
Mental health 93.00±14.17 81.99±25.26 0.0044*

Note: *Significant (P < 0.05).

Differences in Vision-Related Quality of Life Before and After Surgery in Patient Group

Following a 6-month follow-up period, it was observed that the VQF scores of patients at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery demonstrated varying degrees of improvement compared to preoperative scores (p < 0.05), as illustrated in Figure 2. Notably, at 1 month post-surgery, patients showed significant enhancements in three areas: general health, general vision, and ocular pain. By 3 and 6 months post-surgery, improvements were also noted in general health, general vision, ocular pain, role difficulties, and mental health compared to preoperative assessments. All observed differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The variation curve of the VQF score is depicted, with the horizontal axis representing four distinct time points for patient scale evaluation and the vertical axis indicating the average VQF score of the patient cohort at these time points.

Abbreviation: M AF, month after surgery.

Table 3.

Comparison of VQF Scores in Patients Before and After Surgery

Rated Items Before Surgery 1 Month After Surgery 3 Month After Surgery 6 Month After Surgery
Score P Value Score P Value Score P Value
Overall score 74.17±11.81 77.95±10.97 0.0108* 85.86±9.317 <0.0001* 87.13±8.418 <0.0001*
General health 54.44±24.60 63.43±22.63 0.0247* 69.91±20.25 <0.0001* 68.52±17.63 0.0002*
General vision 53.63±23.13 63.43±17.32 0.0044* 67.82±14.28 0.0003* 65.28±13.45 0.0027*
Ocular pain 79.44±24.18 87.50±15.16 0.0420* 89.81±13.32 0.0045* 90.28±13.23 0.0025*
Near activities 85.01±17.13 89.51±12.24 0.1141 89.35±14.06 0.1766 88.43±14.06 0.3425
Distance activities 90.79±14.46 90.43±12.58 0.2263 89.58±13.63 0.0901 90.74±10.70 0.2190
Peripheral vision 91.53±16.29 92.59±12.50 >0.9999 91.67±14.57 0.6871 92.13±13.58 0.8371
Social functioning 95.97±9.542 95.37±9.49 0.2551 94.68±11.29 0.1457 95.37±9.181 0.3219
Color vision 97.58±7.452 95.83±9.40 0.0580 95.37±10.94 0.0832 98.15±6.609 >0.9999
Driving 88.54±17.83 93.70±10.34 0.4195 91.48±10.86 0.7646 93.99±7.569 0.1043
Role difficulties 81.18±22.48 82.72±25.38 0.7717 90.12±18.74 0.0243* 91.82±17.84 0.0080*
Dependency 86.69±21.58 83.18±27.06 0.1903 89.20±18.14 0.7434 90.43±15.65 0.4761
Mental health 81.99±25.26 82.72±27.42 0.8018 91.51±17.99 0.0466* 93.06±17.86 0.0218*

Note: *Significant (p < 0.05).

Analysis of the Correlation Between the Course of Disease and the Changes in in Vision-Related Quality of Life

Correlation analysis results revealed a negative correlation between the disease course and changes in the VQF score (p < 0.0001, r = −0.6634) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The correlation analysis between the disease course and VQF score changes is illustrated in the figure, where the abscissa represents the disease course and the ordinate represents changes in the VQF score. #The changes in score were calculated as the VQF score at six months post-surgery minus the pre-surgery VQF score.

Effect of Prosthetic Tube Implantation on in Vision-Related Quality of Life

The findings indicated no significant differences in preoperative VQF scores, VQF scores at six months post-surgery, or changes in scores between the catheterized (all silicone tubing in place) and non-catheterized groups. None of these differences were statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Effect of Prosthetic Tube Implantation on VQF Score

Intraoperative Intubation P Value
Yes No
Preoperative VQF score 73.55±12.32 75.97±10.56 0.5143
VQF score at 6 months after surgery 86.79±8.62 88.23±8.13 0.5856
The changes in the score# 13.24±12.49 12.26±7.63 0.7842

Note: #The changes in score were calculated as the VQF score at six months post-surgery minus the pre-surgery VQF score.

Discussion

Chronic dacryocystitis (CD), as an eye condition that does not typically lead to blindness, has historically been under-researched. The etiology of CD primarily involves the obstruction or narrowing of the nasolacrimal duct, often accompanied by secondary infections. Clinical manifestations include persistent epiphora, increased ocular discharge, and purulent exudate. The prevalence of CD is notably higher among middle-aged and elderly females. In its early stages, the disease is frequently asymptomatic, lacking overt signs such as redness, swelling, or pain, which contributes to its frequent underdiagnosis.23 Nonetheless, extant research indicates that impaired lacrimal drainage in individuals with CD compromises the physiological cleaning function of the ocular surface, leading to the accumulation of deleterious substances and disruption of tear film homeostasis.24 Consequently, this may precipitate a cascade of complications, including secondary dry eye syndrome,25 infections, and potentially even blindness.3 With societal advancements and an increased emphasis on quality of life, there has been a growing recognition of CD, leading to heightened awareness and research interest.19

In clinical practice, it has been observed that the majority of patients with CD experience a prolonged disease course, with some cases persisting for months or even years. These patients frequently resort to surgical intervention once the disease significantly impairs their daily life and occupational functioning.6 Such delays in treatment not only exacerbate patient suffering but may also contribute to further disease progression. Our findings indicate that patients who adopt a proactive approach early in the disease trajectory and undergo surgical treatment tend to achieve more favorable outcomes, both in terms of prognosis and subjective quality of life. Previous research has predominantly concentrated on surgical techniques and short-term outcomes, with limited exploration of the relationship between surgical timing and improvements in patients’ quality of life. While research has suggested that surgery can improve quality of life in patients with CD,26 but the scope of assessment is not comprehensive, follow-up period is not long enough.

Furthermore, our prior study demonstrated that epiphora resulting from chronic dacryocystitis can adversely affect patients’ visual quality.11 In this study, we conducted a further examination of the results and discovered that the VQF scores for patients with CD were significantly lower than those of the control group. This finding suggests that the frequent lacrimal tearing associated with the disease adversely impacts patients’ vision-related quality of life, particularly in areas such as ocular pain, distance activities, role difficulties, and mental health.

En-DCR has emerged as a well-established surgical intervention for the treatment of CD.27 Compared to the traditional external approach, En-DCR offers advantages such as reduced surgical trauma, minimal bleeding, and the absence of facial scarring, making it a preferred option among patients. It is associated with high patient satisfaction and demonstrates a success rate exceeding 90%.28 In our study, the procedure’s efficacy rate was 92.59% (including both cured and improved cases). By establishing a channel between the lacrimal sac and the nasal cavity, the procedure facilitates the passage of tears through the lacrimal sac, bypassing the obstructed nasolacrimal duct, and allowing direct flow into the nasal cavity. This effectively alleviates symptoms such as epiphora and increased secretions.29 In the longitudinal assessment of patients following En-DCR, it was observed that postoperative VQF scores exhibited substantial enhancement. At one month post-surgery, there was a notable improvement in patients’ overall health, general vision, and ocular pain. By three and six months postoperatively, significant advancements were also observed in patients’ role-related difficulties and mental health. These findings suggest that En-DCR markedly ameliorates symptoms and enhances vision-related quality of life in individuals with CD.

Correlation analysis revealed a negative association between the duration of the disease and changes in VQF scores (p<0.0001, r=−0.6634). Patients with a prolonged disease course are at an elevated risk of infection due to prolonged obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system, which exacerbates the impact of chronic epiphora and increased secretions on their quality of life. Post-surgical intervention results in significant alleviation or even resolution of symptoms such as tearing and purulent discharge, thereby substantially improving patients’ vision-related quality of life. In certain patients with a prolonged disease course, significant ocular surface damage and severe disruption of tear film homeostasis are often observed. While En-DCR surgery effectively addresses issues related to tear overflow, it may not sufficiently mitigate other daily ocular surface function abnormalities, necessitating more comprehensive examination and treatment. Our research indicates that as the disease advances, patients experience exacerbated symptoms and a more substantial decline in vision-related quality of life. Conversely, patients who underwent surgical intervention earlier in the disease course exhibited greater postoperative improvements in vision-related quality of life, likely due to less pre-existing ocular surface damage.

For patients with anastomotic stenosis and severe lacrimal duct inflammatory reactions, lacrimal duct catheterization is adopted to support the lacrimal duct, maintain the anatomical structure of the anastomosis, and promote tear drainage. Although previous studies have demonstrated that lacrimal duct catheterization can enhance the prognosis of En-DCR,30,31 the impact of intraoperative catheterization on postoperative quality of life remains unexplored. The findings of this study indicate that for patients undergoing intraoperative catheterization (with all silicone tubing in place), the enhancement in their postoperative VQF scores was not significantly different from that of patients who did not undergo catheterization. This suggests that catheterization does not impact the improvement of vision-related quality of life. Therefore, we can decide whether to place a catheter based on the intraoperative situation without worrying about affecting the patient’s quality of life.

Furthermore, it was observed that some patients with a prolonged disease course exhibited postoperative VQF scores exceeding the average values of the normal population. This phenomenon may be attributed to the heightened subjective experiences of these patients, whose quality of life had been substantially impaired by the disease, leading to a pronounced sense of relief and well-being once symptoms were alleviated. Consequently, these patients may experience a level of satisfaction that surpasses that of the general population.

This study has some limitations that need addressing: First, patients with bilateral obstruction typically undergo En-DCR in both eyes through two separate procedures within a month, impacting the evaluation of postoperative vision-related quality of life. Consequently, patients with bilateral disease were excluded from the cohort, leading to a lack of analysis for these cases. Second, the large number of postoperative follow-up visits and questionnaire questions resulted in a slightly insufficient sample size, with some patients not complying and being lost to follow-up. This not only reduces the number of included patients, but also weakens the reliability of statistical analysis and brings about a certain degree of response bias. Larger-sample prospective studies are needed for further validation in the future. Attempting additional studies in different populations and clinical settings would enhance the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion

CD is a condition that adversely affects patients’ vision-related quality of life, primarily manifesting in ocular pain, difficulties with distance activities, role limitations, and mental health challenges. En-DCR is an effective procedure that can significantly enhance the postoperative vision-related quality of life for these patients. In clinical diagnosis and treatment, early diagnosis and treatment should be prioritized, and medical staff should educate patients to seek timely medical attention after symptoms appear to enhance their quality of life and achieve better surgical outcomes.

Funding Statement

This study was partly supported by the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center 2024 Innovations in Graduate Education Project (NO.91017-12240013).

Data Sharing Statement

The data used for the analysis are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, China (No. 2021KYPJ100) and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN. New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2329–2336. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00946-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yuksel D, Kosker M, Akoz I, Simsek S. Long-term results of simultaneous bilateral external dacryocystorhinostomy in cases with bilateral dacryostenosis. Seminars Ophthalmol. 2015;30(1):20–24. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2013.810282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chakrabarti S, Dasgupta S, Banerjee M, Pal D. Role of histomorphology and chronic inflammation score in chronic dacryocystitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(7):EC01–EC03. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19515.8089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ma Y, Wang Z, Zhou G, et al. Comparison of the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis with or without previous bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Am J Otolaryngol. 2024;45(2):104200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PA. The evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48(1):73–84. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00397-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hammoudi DS, Tucker NA. Factors associated with outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstructive Surg. 2011;27(4):266–269. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31820c72b7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tooley AA, Klingler KN, Bartley GB, et al. Dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct stenosis in the elderly (≥80 Years of Age). Ophthalmology. 2017;124(2):263–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Assi L, Chamseddine F, Ibrahim P, et al. A global assessment of eye health and quality of life: a systematic review of systematic reviews. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(5):526–541. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin L, Yang L, Jin X, Zhao Y, Fan F. Management lacrimal sac abscesses using lacrimal probe and crawford silicon tube. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0378-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Enander JMD, Spanne A, Mazzoni A, Bengtsson F, Oddo CM, Jörntell H. Ubiquitous neocortical decoding of tactile input patterns. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:140. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meng Z, Chen R, Cao S, et al. Quality of vision in eyes with chronic dacryocystitis after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:3729–3737. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S441094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wan Y, Zhao L, Huang C, et al. Validation and comparison of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and the Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) in patients with cataracts: a multicentre study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(4):e480–e488. doi: 10.1111/aos.14606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Trento M, Durando O, Lavecchia S, et al; EUROCONDOR trial investigators. Vision related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes in the EUROCONDOR trial. Endocrine. 2017;57(1):83–88. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1097-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Garweg JG, Stefanickova J, Hoyng C, et al; AQUA Investigators. Vision-related quality of life in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal aflibercept: the AQUA Study. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019;3(7):567–575. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ng H, Vermeer KA, van Meurs JC, La Heij EC. Visual acuity inadequately reflects vision-related quality of life in patients after macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2020;61(10):34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.10.34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang CW, Chan CL, Jin HY. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire. Optometry Vision Sci. 2008;85(11):1091–1099. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818b9f23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ezhumalai S. Outcome of camp approach in treatment of alcohol use disorder: a non-randomized controlled study. J Psychiatry Spectr. 2024;3(2):101–109. doi: 10.4103/jopsys.jopsys_48_23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shen X, Huang C, Wang S, Wen J. Optimisation of reduction for prolapsed silicone tube after lacrimal intubation. J Laryngology Otol. 2024;138(5):535–539. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Eshraghi B, Abdi P, Akbari M, Fard MA. Microbiologic spectrum of acute and chronic dacryocystitis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(5):864–867. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.05.23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD; National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1050–1058. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nickels S, Schuster AK, Singer S, et al. The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) - reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li M, Li W, Sha Q, Yu L, Wang X. Analysis of the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic nasal dacryocystorhinostomy in the remedy of chronic dacryocystitis. Medicine. 2024;103(3):e36934. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ali MJ, Kamal S, Gupta A, Ali MH, Naik MN. Simple vs complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions: etiology, management and outcomes. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(2):174–177. doi: 10.1002/alr.21435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marcet MM, Shtein RM, Bradley EA, et al. Safety and efficacy of lacrimal drainage system plugs for dry eye syndrome: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1681–1687. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu X, Wang K, Hu Y, et al. Dry eye and decreased tear film stability in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction patients. Int Ophthalmol. 2024;44(1):277. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03204-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ali MJ, Iram S, Ali MH, Naik MN. Assessing the outcomes of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in adults using the Lacrimal Symptom (Lac-Q) questionnaire. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33(1):65–68. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lueder GT. Neonatal dacryocystitis associated with nasolacrimal duct cysts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995;32(2):102–106. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19950301-10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nowak R, Ali MJ. Experience of the first three years of independent practice following surgical training: time taken and long-term outcomes of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Seminars Ophthalmol. 2023;38(7):665–669. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2195025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Torabi P, Stenstrom B, Larsson AM, Bjornberg P, Svensson C, Engelsberg K. Outcomes of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy according to a modified Lacrimal Symptom Questionnaire (Lac-Q). Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol J. 2023;12(2):55–61. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Evereklioglu C. Primary probing with and without Monoka Silastic stent intubation for epiphora in older children and adults. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(1):87–90. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1643026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Orsolini MJ, Schellini SA, Souza Meneguim RLF, Catâneo AJM. Success of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without stents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orbit. 2020;39(4):258–265. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2019.1677726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used for the analysis are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES