Abstract
The lateral organization of Shiga toxin bound to a lipid membrane is significantly influenced by the fatty acid geometry of its receptor glycolipid globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), which is crucial for the protein’s internalization into the host cell. To control the lipid geometry, we used a photoisomerizable azobenzene derivative of Gb3 (photo-Gb3) that can be switched between a trans- and a cis-configuration under light. We reconstituted this photo-Gb3 into liquid-disordered (ld)/liquid-ordered (lo) phase-separated pore-spanning membranes (PSMs), creating freestanding bilayer parts (freestanding PSMs [f-PSMs]) composed of an lo phase surrounded by an ld phase on the pore rims. Upon UV irradiation, we observed small, mobile, and transient ld domains in the f-PSMs, indicating a trans-to-cis isomerization of the photo-Gb3. The mean diffusion coefficient of the ld domains was determined to be 0.014 ± 0.009 μm2/s, from which we estimated a membrane surface viscosity of 12–21 × 10−8 Pa s m, indicative of an lo phase. Before photoisomerization, Shiga toxin B (STxB) bound homogeneously to the lo phase in the f-PSMs harboring the photo-Gb3. Upon trans-to-cis isomerization of the photo-Gb3, ld lakes were again formed, and the homogeneous protein distribution turned into dynamic STxB density fluctuations, which are discussed in the context of the entry process of Shiga toxin into the host cell.
Significance
The fatty acid structure of the receptor glycolipid globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) influences the organization of membrane-bound Shiga toxin, which can impact the entry of the toxin into the host cell. To control the fatty acid geometry of Gb3 in situ in a time-resolved manner, we employed a Gb3-azobenzene derivative. Reconstituted into phase-separated pore-spanning membranes, the light-induced trans-to-cis isomerization of the Gb3 derivative led to small and mobile liquid-disordered lipid domains and Shiga toxin density fluctuations.
Introduction
Glycosphingolipids, including Gb3 (globotriaosylceramide), are a class of lipid molecules known for their significant biological and physiological functions. Found in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, they play central roles in various biological processes, such as cell-cell communication, signal transduction, and modulation of membrane biophysical properties. Gb3, in particular, gains prominence due to its function as a receptor for bacterial Shiga toxins, which are responsible for certain types of food poisoning and other disorders like hemolytic uremic syndrome, colitis, or bloody diarrhea (1,2). Shiga toxins are AB5 proteins (3) produced by Shigella dysenteriae and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli and are composed of an enzymatically active A subunit and five B subunits. The B subunits recognize Gb3 as the first step for the toxin uptake into the host cell. After this uptake, the toxin is translocated to the endoplasmic reticulum via a retrograde transport through the trans-Golgi network into the cytosol, where the A1 domain of the A subunit catalytically removes an adenosine moiety from the 60S ribosomal subunit (4,5).
To investigate the first step of Shiga toxin uptake, model membranes appear well suited (6,7,8). Using giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) and supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) composed of a fluid-phase lipid, sphingomyelin, and cholesterol doped with Gb3 (9), it was found that Shiga toxin binds solely to the liquid-ordered (lo) phase in these lo/liquid-disordered (ld) phase-separated bilayers. The lateral organization of the bound protein is significantly influenced by the Gb3 geometry. Shiga toxin B (STxB) high-density protein clusters and low-density protein areas were observed on SLBs containing Gb3 with a saturated C24:0 fatty acid (10,11). Such protein clusters, accumulating Gb3 molecules with a saturated fatty acid, might inhibit membrane bending (9) due to the overall rigid structure of the membrane (12,13). However, a C24:1 unsaturated fatty acid leads to protein clusters (14,15) that are separated by protein-free lo and ld domains. This protein arrangement is supposed to induce negative curvature, eventually leading to the observed Shiga toxin-induced invaginations (16).
One drawback of SLBs is their direct contact with the support, which reduces the mobility of the lipids and lipid domains (17,18), hampering a rapid reorganization of the membrane and protein arrangement. To overcome this drawback, we developed pore-spanning membranes (PSMs) (19). PSMs are composed of supported membrane regions (supported PSMs [s-PSMs]) and freestanding ones (freestanding PSMs [f-PSMs]), in which lipid domain mobility becomes readily visible on the timescale of milliseconds (20). This membrane system provides the required dynamics (21) to investigate how a change in Gb3 geometry influences the organization of membrane-bound Shiga toxin in a time-resolved manner.
To switch the Gb3 geometry, we recently attached an azobenzene group to its fatty acid (22). Photo-switchable lipids, such as azobenzene derivatives, allow the modulation of lo and ld domains simply by light (23), which is noninvasive. Upon UV irradiation, the trans-to-cis isomerization of the azobenzene group leads to a diminution of the area of lo domains, indicating a reduced membrane order (24). Conversely, after cis-to-trans isomerization induced by blue light irradiation, the area of lo domains increases as membrane order is partially restored. Domain rearrangement was found to be dependent on the photo-lipid concentration, the position of the azobenzene group in the hydrophobic core of the membrane (25), and the structure of the polar head of the photo-lipids (24).
Here, we used a synthetic Gb3 derivative harboring an azobenzene moiety to switch it between the trans- and cis-configuration, thus altering the geometry of the glycolipid. Employing confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) experiments, we observed changes in membrane organization in the f-PSMs upon light irradiation. The altered Gb3 lipid geometry also significantly changed the Shiga toxin organization on the lo phase of the membrane.
Materials and methods
Materials
1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), N-stearoyl-D-erythro-sphingosylphosphoryl-choline (SM18:0), cholesterol, and BODIPY-cholesterol were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, Alabama). The photo-Gb3 (Fig. 1 C) was synthesized as described previously (22). ATTO655-DOPE was obtained from ATTO Technology (Siegen, Germany) and fluorescein-bis(methyliminodiacetic acid) (calcein) from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Silicon monoxide granules (SiO, 4–8 mm) were purchased from Merck. Indium tin oxide coverslips (25 × 75 mm2, thickness: 1.1 mm) were obtained from Präzisions Glas & Optik (Iserlohn, Germany). Porous silicon nitride micro-cup substrates with pore diameters of 3 μm were obtained from Aquamarijn Membranes B.V. (Wageningen, the Netherlands). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was prepared using 136 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.5 mM KH2PO4. Calcein-PBS was prepared by dissolving the fluorophore in the buffer to a final concentration of 100 μM. Buffers were adjusted to a pH of 7.4. All buffer reagents were purchased from VWR International (Darmstadt, Germany). Petri dishes (3 cm diameter) were purchased from Mattek (Ashland, Massachusetts).
Figure 1.
(A) Preparation of phase-separated pore-spanning membranes. 1) GUVs are sedimented on a SiOx-functionalized substrate in calcein-containing buffer at 65°C. 2) Samples were cooled down overnight, allowing the formation of lo domains (dark) on the pores and ld domains (red) on the pore rims. 3) Side view of the pores, in which calcein (blue) has been entrapped after the spreading of the GUVs, forming PSMs. (B) Fluorescence micrographs of phase-separated PSMs on a porous substrate with closed pores at the bottom (micro-cups). Lipid composition: DOPC/SM18/cholesterol/ATTO655-DOPE (39.5:39.5:20:1, n/n). Lipid: the ld phase, labeled with ATTO655-DOPE (red fluorescence), is located on the s-PSMs, whereas f-PSMs are composed of the lo phase from which the fluorescent dye is excluded. Calcein: the water-soluble dye calcein (blue fluorescence) is entrapped in the micro-cups. One pore is not covered by a membrane, which appears black. Merged: the lipid dye shows the s-PSMs, whereas the entrapped calcein reports on the pore coverage. In the bottom right corner, the pore is not covered with a membrane, and thus, calcein is not entrapped. (C) Chemical structure of photo-Gb3. (D) Fluorescence micrographs of phase-separated PSMs containing photo-Gb3. Lipid composition: DOPC/SM18/cholesterol/photo-Gb3/ATTO655-DOPE (37:20:22:20:1, n/n). A contrast correction factor (γ) of 0.5 was applied for better visualization.
Preparation of GUVs
GUVs were prepared by electro-formation as described previously (26). Lipids were first dissolved in chloroform and the photo-Gb3 in chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v). Mixtures containing DOPC/SM18:0/cholesterol/ATTO655-DOPE (39.5:39.5:20:1, n/n) or DOPC/SM18:0/cholesterol/photo-Gb3/ATTO655-DOPE (37:20:22:20:1, n/n) were prepared in a glass test tube and then spread on indium tin oxide coverslips to form dried lipid films (0.25 mg). The remaining solvent was removed by drying the coverslips under a vacuum at 65°C for 1 h. A homemade chamber was built using a silicon ring and filled with 1.7 mL of sucrose solution (298 mOsm/L). Electro-formation was performed for 3 h by applying an alternating sinusoidal current at a frequency of 12 Hz with an amplitude of 1.6 V (peak to peak). GUVs were collected in black microcentrifuge tubes and conserved for 5 days at room temperature. GUVs containing the chosen ternary lipid mixtures separate into coexisting lo/ld phases as the temperature is lowered through the miscibility transition temperature Tmix, which is around 40°C.
SiOx functionalization of porous substrates
The substrates were functionalized as described previously (27). Briefly, porous silicon nitride micro-cup substrates were rinsed with ethanol and ultrapure water and dried with a stream of N2. The substrates were placed in the center of a convex glass lens beaker, which was subsequently placed in a Bal-TecMed020 high vacuum coating system from Bal-Tec (Balzers, Liechtenstein). SiO was deposited on the substrates at a rate of 0.3 nm/s. Freshly coated substrates were placed in ultrapure water for 1 h at 55°C to form a hydrophilic SiOx layer (x = 1–2).
Preparation of PSMs
Preparation of the PSMs was carried out in the dark to protect the photo-Gb3 and at 65°C, well above the miscibility transition temperature Tmix of the lipid composition to ensure that the GUVs, spread on the porous support, are homogeneous and in the ld phase. Freshly coated SiOx substrates were glued in the center of petri dishes using non-conductive adhesive stickers (Plano, Wetzlar, Germany) and rinsed with ultrapure water. The petri dishes were filled with 3 mL of calcein-containing PBS. 150 μL of the GUV suspension was sedimented on the substrate for 3 min with a 5 mL pipette tip filled with calcein-free PBS. The samples were then slowly cooled to room temperature overnight in the dark. During the cooling process, the PSMs separate into the ld and lo phases. Prior to imaging, samples were rinsed abundantly with calcein-free PBS buffer. For protein-binding experiments, STxB was labeled with the fluorophore Cy3 using a fast conjugation kit (ab188287, Abcam, Berlin, Germany). The labeled protein was added to the PSMs at a final concentration of 300 nM. After a gentle agitation for 1 h, the samples were rinsed with calcein-free PBS to remove unbound STxB.
Light irradiation
A pE-4000 LED from CoolLed (Andover, Hampshire, United Kingdom) was used as a light source to irradiate the samples with UV-A (365 nm) and blue light (435–460 nm). The optical fiber was mounted in the collimator of the microscope so that the light could be directed to the samples via the optical path through the objective. The light power density (in W) applied to the samples was measured using a Field Max II-TO power meter from Coherent (Wilsonville, Oregon). Samples were irradiated for 15 s at a power density of 3 mW/cm2 with UV light and 150 mW/cm2 with blue light.
Fluorescence microscopy imaging
CLSM experiments were carried out using an LSM 710 CLSM from Carl Zeiss (Jena, Germany) equipped with a 488 nm Ar laser (1% power), a 633 nm He-Ne laser (3% power), and a 561-10 DPSS laser (3% power) to excite calcein, ATTO655-DOPE, and the Cy3-labeled STxB, respectively. The pinhole was set to 1.5 airy units and the pixel dwell time to 1 μs. Images and time series with 512 × 512 pixels2 (16-bit resolution) were recorded with a W Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.0 M27 objective. Image analysis was performed with FIJI (http://fiji.sc/Fiji (28)). Graphs were plotted with GraphPad Prism software 10 for Windows (San Diego, California).
Image processing and domain diffusion analysis
To gather information about the diffusion of the observed ld domains in the f-PSMs, the imaging data were analyzed using self-written Python-based scripts (29,30,31). Each f-PSM with a visible ld domain was cropped from the movie with FIJI (28), and the consecutive images in which the ld domain was visible throughout were subjected to the analysis. At first, a histogram-matching-based adjustment of the image intensities was performed to account for the bleaching of the fluorophore during image acquisition (32). Here, the intensities of all images in each time series were adjusted so that their intensity histogram matched the intensity histogram of the first image as closely as possible. Next, a Gaussian blur was applied to the images to reduce the impact of noise. A two-dimensional Gaussian kernel with a σ value of 70 nm was used for the convolution of all frames. Since the domains only appeared after UV irradiation, the frames before the UV irradiation were used for background correction using the same image-processing routine (cropping out the pore of interest, bleaching correction, and Gaussian blurring). The resulting frames were averaged and then subtracted from each image in which the domain was visible. This increased the contrast between the domains and the background and removed signals from the pore rims. After this preprocessing, a circular mask was applied to the images to exclude image features outside the pore as well as close to the pore rim. A thresholding-based binarization was performed by manually choosing an appropriate intensity threshold to track the domains using the coordinates of the domain centroid. The coordinates of the binarized domain were determined using OpenCV-based contour finding and image moments (33). Plotting was performed using Matplotlib and Trackpy (34,35). The mean-squared displacement (MSD) was calculated from the trajectories, and the diffusion coefficient D was extracted by fitting a linear function to the first four data points of each MSD as with the lag time τ.
Results and discussion
Phase behavior of PSMs lacking photo-Gb3
PSMs were prepared by spreading GUVs composed of DOPC/SM18/cholesterol/ATTO655-DOPE onto SiOx-coated porous substrates. SiOx-coated porous substrates are advantageous over gold-covered ones because the intensity of the lipid fluorophores on the supported parts is much less quenched than on gold (20,36). GUV spreading was performed above the miscibility transition temperature of the lipid mixture and in the presence of a calcein-containing buffer (Figs. 1 A and S1). After slowly cooling the samples to room temperature overnight, which resulted in the phase separation of the lipid mixture, fluorescence micrographs were taken. The resulting fluorescence micrographs reveal PSMs comprising freestanding membrane parts (f-PSMs) and supported parts (s-PSMs). The s-PSMs are fluorescent, i.e., they harbor the fluid-phase marker ATTO655-DOPE (Fig. 1 B, lipid), indicative of the ld phase. The fluorescence appears slightly inhomogeneous on the s-PSMs (Figs. 1 B, lipid, and S2, A–C). The lipid composition, in particular sphingomyelin, can influence the phase behavior of bilayers (37,38); however, the darker regions observed on the s-PSMs might result from an inhomogeneity of the SiOx functionalization and a varying distance of the s-PSM from the support (39,40). In contrast, the f-PSMs appear dark, as the lipid label is excluded, indicating the lo phase (39,40).
The observed phase separation of the lipid composition in PSMs agrees with our previous findings (39). In this study, we argued that the re-localization of the fluid-phase lipids onto the pore rims results from the adhesion strength of the lipids to the support (41) and the surface roughness of the SiOx layer (RMS = 0.49 ± 0.03 nm) (40).
Sumitomo et al. (42) investigated phase-separated PSMs composed of DOPC/DPPC/cholesterol (30:40:30) on SiO2-coated porous substrates (RMS < 0.3 nm). However, they observed the fluid phase in the f-PSMs, which they partly explained with the overhang at the aperture of the substrate. With a smaller bending rigidity of the ld phase than the lo phase, the alignment of the membrane with the substrate topology would energetically be less costly (43). In addition, there is a difference in the overall surface roughness (SiO2 versus SiOx) and the lipid composition, with DOPC/DPPC/cholesterol (30:40:30) having an approximately 10°C lower miscibility transition temperature (44).
From the ATTO655-DOPE fluorescence micrographs alone (Fig. 1 B, lipid), it is difficult to evaluate whether f-PSMs were formed and whether the PSMs were impermeable. To select the areas on the surface where f-PSMs had been formed, the water-soluble dye calcein was entrapped into the cavities of the micro-cups. From fluorescence overlays of the lipid dye and calcein, the areas with f-PSMs were unambiguously identified (Fig. S1). The observed calcein fluorescence in the cavities clearly shows that f-PSMs with lo phase, excluding the lipid dye, are present and entrap the water-soluble dye (Fig. 1 B, calcein, merged).
Phase behavior and isomerization of Gb3-containing PSMs
Next, the influence of the photo-Gb3 on the stability and phase behavior of the PSMs upon isomerization was investigated. PSMs were prepared from GUVs containing 20 mol % of the photo-Gb3 (DOPC/SM18:0/cholesterol/photo-Gb3/ATTO655-DOPE) using the same protocol. Before irradiation, the fluorescence micrographs of the lipid fluorophore and the calcein were indistinguishable from those without the photo-Gb3 (Fig. 1 D). The PSMs were then exposed to UV-A and blue light irradiation, and the impact of isomerization on the membrane organization was investigated with CLSM. As a control, PSMs lacking the photo-Gb3 were irradiated (Fig. S2). In the absence of photo-Gb3, the appearance of the phase-separated PSMs remained unaffected, and no modification of membrane organization became visible (Fig. S2; Video S1). The calcein signal diminished significantly after blue light irradiation, which can be attributed to bleaching (Fig. S4, A and B), as this fluorophore absorbs in the blue region (45). In the presence of the photo-Gb3 and before irradiation, the PSMs appear the same as those lacking the azobenzene compound. The PSMs are phase separated, with the lo phase mainly located on the f-PSMs (Fig. 1 D). Upon UV irradiation, small ld domains became discernible in the f-PSMs (Fig. S3; Video S2). Such domains have been reported previously in SLBs and were termed ld lakes (24,25). The analysis of the time-dependent calcein fluorescence in the cavities indicates that the f-PSMs did not become leaky upon UV irradiation (Fig. S4 A and B). Approximately 50% of the f-PSMs displayed at least one ld lake 60 s after UV irradiation. We assume that the photo-Gb3 in the trans-configuration is preferentially localized in the f-PSMs, which are enriched in lo-phase lipids. Saturated Gb3 species were shown to be more miscible with lo-phase lipids (46), and photo-lipids in the trans-configuration behave more like saturated lipids (47). The trans-to-cis isomerization of the photo-Gb3 fluidizes small membrane areas leading to ld lakes. Interestingly, a portion of the ld lakes disappeared rapidly after UV irradiation. 5 and 10 min after UV illumination, ld lakes were visible in approximately 30% and 20% of the f-PSMs, respectively (Fig. 2 C). The transient nature of the ld lakes might be a result of the mobility of the lipids in the PSM system. The formed ld lakes, including the cis-configured Gb3 molecules (48), equilibrate with the ld phase on the s-PSMs and thus disappear over time (Fig. 2 C).
Figure 2.
Isomerization of photo-Gb3 in protein-free PSMs. Lipid composition: DOPC/SM18/cholesterol/photo-Gb3/ATTO655-DOPE, 37:20:22:20:1, n/n. (A) Transient ld lakes (white dashed circles) are visible in f-PSMs (dark) 30 s after trans-to-cis isomerization of photo-Gb3. (B) For better visualization of the ld lakes (red dashed circles) and quantification, a grayscale image was generated with Gaussian blurring. (C) Quantification of ld lakes during the illumination process (N = 27 f-PSMs). The number of ld lakes increased immediately after UV irradiation (magenta line). The lakes persisted for a few seconds and partially vanished over time. Blue light irradiation (blue line) led to the complete disappearance of the remaining ld lakes (Video S2).
Frame rate: 20 fps.
Frame rate: 20 fps.
Blue light irradiation led to the complete disappearance of the remaining ld lakes, suggesting a successful cis-to-trans isomerization (Fig. 2 C; Video S2). On the s-PSMs, the membrane remains in the fluid phase during the entire illumination process (Fig. S3). This observation meets our expectations. s-PSMs are enriched in fluid-phase lipids, and because the trans-to-cis isomerization leads to fluidization (24,25), the phase does not change. In contrast to the ld lakes in lo domains in SLBs after trans-to-cis isomerization of photo-ceramides (25) and the uncaging of caged ceramides (49), the observed ld lakes in f-PSMs were fully mobile (Fig. 3). To better visualize these individual ld domains, we zoomed in on each corresponding f-PSM and applied image processing such as bleaching correction and Gaussian blurring (Fig. 3 A). To quantitatively analyze the ld-lake movement, we used an automated tracking algorithm. An exemplary track of an ld lake is shown in Fig. 3 B. Even though, in this example, an ld lake was visible for only 87 s, it moved almost across the whole f-PSM. To quantify this diffusion dynamics, we calculated the MSD and used a linear fit to determine the apparent diffusion coefficient of the ld lake (Fig. 3 C).
Figure 3.
Diffusion analysis shows high mobility of the individual domains. (A) Greyscale image (after bleaching correction and Gaussian blurring) of an individual f-PSM with a mobile ld lake (red arrow) right after it became visible (t = 0 s). Scale bar: 1 μm. (B) Overlay of the image from (A) (top left triangle), the binarized ld lake (full image; black corresponds to the recognized domain, whereas white was not recognized), and the corresponding trajectory. Red dashed circles indicate the location of the ld lake at the start point (t = 0 s) and the end point (t = 87 s) of the trajectory. (C) Mean-squared displacement (MSD) curves of all analyzed domains (n = 15 single ld lakes measured across 4 separate experiment days). Individual MSD data points are shown as blue circles. Red lines represent linear fits to the individual MSDs, yielding the diffusion coefficients shown in (D) as a boxplot. The box shows the quartiles of the D values, and the whiskers correspond to the 5th and 95th percentiles, whereas red circles indicate single measurements. The black line is the median. A mean diffusion coefficient of 0.014 ± 0.009 μm2/s (diamond) was obtained.
From the MSD analysis, we calculated a mean diffusion coefficient of 0.014 ± 0.009 μm2/s (Fig. 3, C and D). From the obtained diffusion coefficient, one can roughly estimate the membrane surface viscosity using the model of Hughes, Pailthorpe, and White (HPW) (50). Assuming free diffusion of the ld lakes within the f-PSM, which is a valid assumption given the dimensions of the f-PSM with a radius of rpore = 1.5 μm and a radius of the ld lakes, which is below the resolution limit of about 400 nm, one can neglect the confinement of the f-PSM as a first approximation (20) and apply the HPW model. They developed a hydrodynamical model applicable under an arbitrary tracer size and for arbitrary membrane viscosities (50). As the HPW model requires complicated numerical computations, Petrov et al. (51,52) proposed a semi-empirical formula describing the HPW model fairly well (Eqs. 1 and 2):
| (1) |
with
| (2) |
η denotes the membrane surface viscosity, μ is the water viscosity, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, and γ is Euler’s constant. The semi-empirically derived constants are as follows: c1 = 0.73761, c2 = 0.52119, b1 = 2.74819, and b2 = 0.51465. Using this model, one can estimate the membrane surface viscosity experienced by the ld lakes. Assuming radii of the ld lakes of rlake = 10–400 nm, one obtains membrane surface viscosities of η = 21–12 × 10−8 Pa s m, which are significantly larger than the values obtained for inclusions in fluid-phase membranes (η = 0.2 × 10−8 Pa s m) (51). The large η supports the notion of small ld lakes diffusing in an lo phase (53) exhibiting a larger membrane surface viscosity.
Isomerization of protein-enriched PSMs
Based on the mobile f-PSMs with lo phase, we next addressed how the Gb3 isomerization influences the lateral organization of membrane-bound STxB. PSMs containing 20 mol % of the photo-Gb3 (Fig. 1 C) were incubated with fluorescently labeled STxB (Fig. S5). The STxB signal was strongly visible on the lo domains in the f-PSMs and appeared homogeneous (Fig. 4, t = 0 min).
Figure 4.
Light-induced formation of protein density fluctuations after the isomerization of photo-Gb3 in f-PSMs. Lipid composition: DOPC/SM18/cholesterol/photo-Gb3/ATTO655-DOPE, 37:20:22:20:1, n/n. c(STxB) = 300 nM. A time-lapse was recorded before and after light irradiation (Video S4). Before irradiation, STxB is homogeneously distributed on the surface of the f-PSMs. Protein density fluctuations appeared immediately after UV irradiation (magenta) and persisted after blue light irradiation (blue).
The photo-Gb3 is in the trans-configuration, and it is expected to behave similarly to a saturated fatty acid-harboring Gb3. The observed organization of STxB on the membrane containing the photo-Gb3 agrees well with the behavior of membrane-bound STxB reported on phase-separated GUVs (9,54), where STxB is solely bound to the lo domains. In rare cases, lo domains occurred on s-PSMs to which STxB was also bound (Fig. S7, white squares). The trans-to-cis isomerization of the photo-Gb3 upon UV irradiation significantly modified the distribution of STxB on the f-PSMs. Immediately one frame after UV-light irradiation (15 s), a heterogeneous and dynamic protein distribution became discernible, visible as brighter areas surrounded by darker ones where the protein was barely bound (Fig. 4). Simultaneously and similarly to the protein-free samples, ld lakes were visible in the f-PSMs. A large portion (∼70%) of the ld lakes spontaneously vanished after 10 min, indicating that the phase behavior of the membrane was not significantly altered by the bound protein compared to protein-free f-PSMs (Fig. S6). As the calcein fluorescence remained high while the STxB clusters were formed (Fig. S7), we conclude that the integrity of the f-PSMs is still intact despite the heterogeneity of the bound protein (Video S3).
Frame rate: 20 fps.
Several studies addressed lipid domain remodeling using coexisting lo/ld phase-separated lipid systems combined with light-sensitive probes (23,24,55). However, only a few studies reported on the impact of photo-lipids on protein binding. For example, Carter Ramirez et al. (49) observed cholera toxin B clusters on SLBs doped with the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside GM1 after the photo-lysis of caged ceramides. They also observed that the cholera toxin B clusters were still discernible 1 h after UV irradiation. However, these protein clusters were immobile. Since these studies were conducted using SLBs, it is conceivable that the surface properties affected lipid diffusion (17,18), thus preventing the dispersion of protein clusters.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no study on mobile light-induced protein clusters. Here, we observed highly dynamic STxB fluctuations upon isomerization. The trans-to-cis isomerization of the azobenzene group of Gb3 changes the receptor lipid’s geometry. In the cis-configuration, the photo-Gb3 requires more space, like an unsaturated Gb3 molecule, thus altering the organization of STxB on the membrane and leading to the observed compositional fluctuations. As the lateral membrane tension of the PSMs is, with several mN/m, quite large (39,56), the STxB heterogeneity is not a result of membrane undulations (57). The protein density fluctuates on the f-PSMs (Video S4), in contrast to what has been observed for defined STxB clusters on photo-Gb3-doped SLBs after UV irradiation (22). In that case, immobile STxB clusters were formed on the lo phase. Although the protein density fluctuates over time, protein clusters did not grow, and no stable structures were reached (Video S3). Even blue light irradiation, which should switch the azobenzene moiety from a cis- to a trans-configuration, did not alter the protein distribution (Fig. 4; Video S4). Glaubitz et al. (13) investigated the influence of the photo-phosphatidylcholine (18-azo-PC) configuration on membrane order and diacylglycerol kinase (Dgka) dynamics. Using lipid vesicles, they noticed a decrease in membrane order and an increase in the mobility of Dgka when 18-azo-PC was in the cis-configuration. Consequently, the lack of impact of blue light illumination on protein distribution may be attributed to a higher membrane order (13) and lower lipid diffusion (48) as photo-Gb3 goes back to the trans-configuration.
Frame rate: 20 fps.
We propose that the dynamic fluctuations in protein density may play a role in the entry process of STxB into host cells. STxB is known to bind up to 15 Gb3 molecules, leading to a tight coupling between the protein and the membrane (1). This interaction has been shown to cause lipid compression and reduce the mean molecular area of the lipid bilayer, potentially driving the formation of tubular invaginations that facilitate toxin uptake (7). Recent studies have highlighted the importance of Gb3’s acyl chain composition in STxB-induced membrane reorganization. Specifically, Römer et al. (9) found that STxB binding to Gb3 with saturated acyl chains (Gb3:C22:0) did not lead to invaginations, whereas binding to Gb3 with unsaturated acyl chains (Gb3:C22:1) did. Windschiegl et al. (58) further demonstrated that lipid compaction was dependent on the Gb3 fatty acid, emphasizing the critical role of Gb3 geometry in STxB-induced membrane reorganization.
In this study, we have successfully altered the receptor lipid’s geometry from a trans- (geometry of a saturated acyl chain) to a cis- (geometry of an unsaturated acyl chain) configuration. This change led to a dynamic, heterogeneous protein distribution on the lo phase of the PSMs. The protein arrangements were fully mobile and did not merge into larger clusters over time (Video S4). Although the Gb3 concentrations used were unphysiologically high (20 mol %), the observation of mobile, heterogeneous protein distributions in response to Gb3 with a larger area demand may help explain why STxB generates invaginations in plasma membranes despite binding to lo domains in artificial bilayers, which are energetically more costly to bend than fluid-phase membranes.
Conclusions
PSMs offer a unique platform for studying the dynamics of lipid domains and protein-induced reorganization processes, which are challenging to investigate with lipid bilayers attached to a solid support. By incorporating the receptor lipid Gb3, which contains an azobenzene moiety, into PSMs, we were able to alter the lipid’s geometry in situ using light irradiation. This approach enabled us to examine the dynamic changes in ld/lo phase-separated membranes during the trans-to-cis isomerization of the photo-receptor, as well as the influence of these geometrical changes on the organization of the membrane-bound protein Shiga toxin. Our results show that light-induced disordered domains quickly disappeared, whereas protein density fluctuations induced by the trans-to-cis isomerization remained stable, even though they were fully mobile in the freestanding membranes. This suggests that the combination of mobile f-PSMs and azobenzene lipid derivatives can provide a valuable toolkit for investigating the phase behavior of membranes as well as lipid-geometry-sensitive processes.
Acknowledgments
Shiga toxin B samples were a kind gift from the group of Prof. Dr. Daniel Huster (University of Leipzig). D.B.W. and C.S. thank the German Research Foundation (SFB 803, Project A05) for financial support. C.S. thanks the Max Planck School Matter to Life (BMBF) for financial support.
Author contributions
L.S. conceived the study, performed the CLSM experiments, analyzed the CLSM data, and wrote the manuscript. S.A. and D.B.W. designed and performed the synthesis of photo-Gb3s and acquired funding. M.S. performed the analysis of domain diffusion. C.S. wrote the manuscript and acquired funding.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Editor: Manuel Prieto.
Footnotes
Supporting material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.07.011.
Contributor Information
Larissa Socrier, Email: larissa.socrier@ds.mpg.de.
Claudia Steinem, Email: csteine@gwdg.de.
Supporting material
References
- 1.Bergan J., Dyve Lingelem A.B., Sandvig K., et al. Shiga toxins. Toxicon. 2012;60:1085–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Melton-Celsa A.R. Shiga Toxin (Stx) Classification, Structure, and Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014;2 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.EHEC-0024-2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown P.I., Ojiakor A., Fowler C.C., et al. The diverse landscape of AB5-type toxins. Eng. Microbiol. 2023;3 doi: 10.1016/j.engmic.2023.100104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beddoe T., Paton A.W., et al. Paton J.C. Structure, biological functions and applications of the AB5 toxins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010;35:411–418. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sandvig K., Bergan J., et al. Skotland T. Lipid requirements for entry of protein toxins into cells. Prog. Lipid Res. 2014;54:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang R., Shi J., Swanson B.I., et al. Evidence for cholera aggregation on GM1-decorated lipid bilayers. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2004;33:45–51. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Watkins E.B., Majewski J., et al. Johannes L. Shiga Toxin Induces Lipid Compression: A Mechanism for Generating Membrane Curvature. Nano Lett. 2019;19:7365–7369. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schubert T., Sych T., et al. Römer W. Differential recognition of lipid domains by two Gb3-binding lectins. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:9752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66522-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Römer W., Berland L., et al. Johannes L. Shiga toxin induces tubular membrane invaginations for its uptake into cells. Nature. 2007;450:670–675. doi: 10.1038/nature05996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schütte O.M., Ries A., Werz D.B., et al. Influence of Gb3 glycosphingolipids differing in their fatty acid chain on the phase behaviour of solid supported membranes: chemical syntheses and impact of Shiga toxin binding. Chem. Sci. 2014;5:3104–3114. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sibold J., Ahadi S., Steinem C., et al. Chemically synthesized Gb3 glycosphingolipids: tools to access their function in lipid membranes. Eur. Biophys. J. 2021;50:109–126. doi: 10.1007/s00249-020-01461-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Watkins E.B., Gao H., Johannes L., et al. Carbohydrate conformation and lipid condensation in monolayers containing glycosphingolipid Gb3: influence of acyl chain structure. Biophys. J. 2014;107:1146–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Doroudgar M., Morstein J., et al. Glaubitz C. How Photoswitchable Lipids Affect the Order and Dynamics of Lipid Bilayers and Embedded Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:9515–9528. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gracià R.S., Bezlyepkina N., et al. Dimova R. Effect of cholesterol on the rigidity of saturated and unsaturated membranes: Fluctuation and electrodeformation analysis of giant vesicles. Soft Matter. 2010;6:1472–1482. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kollmitzer B., Heftberger P., et al. Pabst G. Monolayer spontaneous curvature of raft-forming membrane lipids. Soft Matter. 2013;9:10877–10884. doi: 10.1039/C3SM51829A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pezeshkian W., Hansen A.G., et al. Ipsen J.H. Membrane invagination induced by Shiga toxin B-subunit: From molecular structure to tube formation. Soft Matter. 2016;12:5164–5171. doi: 10.1039/c6sm00464d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Przybylo M., Sýkora J., et al. Hof M. Lipid Diffusion in Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Is More than 2 Times Faster than in Supported Phospholipid Bilayers under Identical Conditions. Langmuir. 2006;22:9096–9099. doi: 10.1021/la061934p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Seu K.J., Pandey A.P., et al. Hovis J.S. Effect of surface treatment on diffusion and domain formation in supported lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 2007;92:2445–2450. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.099721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kocun M., Lazzara T.D., et al. Janshoff A. Preparation of solvent-free, pore-spanning lipid bilayers: Modeling the low tension of plasma membranes. Langmuir. 2011;27:7672–7680. doi: 10.1021/la2003172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schütte O.M., Mey I., et al. Steinem C. Size and mobility of lipid domains tuned by geometrical constraints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E6064–E6071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704199114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Spindler S., Sibold J., et al. Sandoghdar V. High-Speed Microscopy of Diffusion in Pore-Spanning Lipid Membranes. Nano Lett. 2018;18:5262–5271. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Socrier L., Ahadi S., Steinem C., et al. Optical manipulation of Gb3 enriched lipid domains: impact of isomerization on Gb3 -Shiga toxin B interaction. Chem. Eur. J. 2023;29 doi: 10.1002/chem.202202766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Socrier L., Steinem C. Photo-Lipids: Light-Sensitive Nano-Switches to Control Membrane Properties. ChemPlusChem. 2023;88 doi: 10.1002/cplu.202300203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hartrampf N., Leitao S.M., et al. Franquelim H.G. Structural diversity of photoswitchable sphingolipids for optodynamic control of lipid microdomains. Biophys. J. 2023;122:2325–2341. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Frank J.A., Franquelim H.G., et al. Trauner D. Optical Control of Lipid Rafts with Photoswitchable Ceramides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:12981–12986. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b07278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Socrier L., Sharma A., Steinem C., et al. Fluorophore position of headgroup-labeled Gb3 glycosphingolipids in lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 2023;122:4104–4112. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Socrier L., Steinem C. In: Methods in Enzymology. Baumgart T., Deserno M., editors. Elsevier; 2024. Pore-spanning membranes as a tool to investigate lateral lipid membrane heterogeneity; pp. 455–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., et al. Cardona A. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Harris C.R., Millman K.J., et al. Oliphant T.E. Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020;585:357–362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Virtanen P., Gommers R., et al. Vázquez-Baeza Y. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:261–272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McKinney W. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. 2010. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python; pp. 56–61. [Google Scholar]
- 32.van der Walt S., Schönberger J.L., et al. scikit-image contributors scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ. 2014;2 doi: 10.7717/peerj.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bradski G. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb's J. Softw. Tools Prof. Program. 2000;25:120–125. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hunter J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007;9:90–95. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Crocker J.C., Grier D.G. Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996;179:298–310. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kramer K., Sari M., et al. Steinem C. From LUVs to GUVs─How to Cover Micrometer-Sized Pores with Membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022;126:8233–8244. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jiménez-Rojo N., García-Arribas A.B., et al. Goñi F.M. Lipid bilayers containing sphingomyelins and ceramides of varying N-acyl lengths: A glimpse into sphingolipid complexity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2014;1838:456–464. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goñi F.M., Alonso A. Biophysics of sphingolipids I. Membrane properties of sphingosine, ceramides and other simple sphingolipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2006;1758:1902–1921. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sibold J., Tewaag V.E., et al. Steinem C. Phase separation in pore-spanning membranes induced by differences in surface adhesion. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22:9308–9315. doi: 10.1039/d0cp00335b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Teske N., Sibold J., et al. Steinem C. Continuous Pore-Spanning Lipid Bilayers on Silicon Oxide-Coated Porous Substrates. Langmuir. 2017;33:14175–14183. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kuhlmann J.W., Mey I.P., Steinem C. Modulating the lateral tension of solvent-free pore-spanning membranes. Langmuir. 2014;30:8186–8192. doi: 10.1021/la5019086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sumitomo K., Oshima A. Liquid-Ordered/Liquid-Crystalline Phase Separation at a Lipid Bilayer Suspended over Microwells. Langmuir. 2017;33:13277–13283. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Böcker M., Muschter S., et al. Schäffer T.E. Imaging and patterning of pore-suspending membranes with scanning ion conductance microscopy. Langmuir. 2009;25:3022–3028. doi: 10.1021/la8034227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Veatch S.L., Keller S.L. Miscibility phase diagrams of giant vesicles containing sphingomyelin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:148101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.148101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kitchen P., Salman M.M., et al. Bill R.M. Calcein Fluorescence Quenching to Measure Plasma Membrane Water Flux in Live Mammalian Cells. STAR Protoc. 2020;1 doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Socrier L., Bail C., Steinem C., et al. The interaction of Gb3 glycosphingolipids with ld and lo phase lipids in lipid monolayers is a function of their fatty acids. Langmuir. 2022;38:5874–5882. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Urban P., Pritzl S.D., et al. Lohmüller T. Light-Controlled Lipid Interaction and Membrane Organization in Photolipid Bilayer Vesicles. Langmuir. 2018;34:13368–13374. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Urban P., Pritzl S.D., Lohmüller T., et al. A Lipid Photoswitch Controls Fluidity in Supported Bilayer Membranes. Langmuir. 2020;36:2629–2634. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Carter Ramirez D.M., Kim Y.A., et al. Johnston L.J. Lipid phase separation and protein-ganglioside clustering in supported bilayers are induced by photorelease of ceramide. Soft Matter. 2013;9:4890–4899. doi: 10.1039/C3SM50240F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hughes B.D., Pailthorpe B.A., White L.R. The translational and rotational drag on a cylinder moving in a membrane. J. Fluid Mech. 1981;110:349–372. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Petrov E.P., Petrosyan R., Schwille P. Translational and rotational diffusion of micrometer-sized solid domains in lipid membranes. Soft Matter. 2012;8:7552. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Petrov E.P., Schwille P. Translational Diffusion in Lipid Membranes beyond the Saffman-Delbrück Approximation. Biophys. J. 2008;94:L41–L43. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.126565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sakuma Y., Kawakatsu T., et al. Imai M. Viscosity Landscape of Phase-Separated Lipid Membrane Estimated from Fluid Velocity Field. Biophys. J. 2020;118:1576–1587. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Safouane M., Berland L., et al. Bassereau P. Lipid Cosorting Mediated by Shiga Toxin Induced Tubulation. Traffic. 2010;11:1519–1529. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Saitov A., Akimov S.A., et al. Pohl P. Ordered Lipid Domains Assemble via Concerted Recruitment of Constituents from Both Membrane Leaflets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020;124 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.108102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mey I., Stephan M., et al. Janshoff A. Local membrane mechanics of pore-spanning bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:7031–7039. doi: 10.1021/ja809165h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pezeshkian W., Gao H., et al. Shillcock J.C. Mechanism of Shiga Toxin Clustering on Membranes. ACS Nano. 2017;11:314–324. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Windschiegl B., Orth A., Steinem C., et al. Lipid reorganization induced by Shiga toxin clustering on planar membranes. PLoS One. 2009;4:1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Frame rate: 20 fps.
Frame rate: 20 fps.
Frame rate: 20 fps.
Frame rate: 20 fps.




