Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2025 Jul 27;18(7):2031–2038. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2025.2031-2038

Determinants of prolonged weaning-to-service interval in primiparous Landrace × Yorkshire sows under tropical conditions: Impact of age at first farrowing, lactation length, and litter size at weaning

Nguyen Hoai Nam 1, Do Thi Kim Lanh 1, Nguyen Van Thanh 1, Bui Van Dung 1, Peerapol Sukon 2,3,
PMCID: PMC12415136  PMID: 40926861

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Primiparous sows are particularly vulnerable to prolonged weaning-to-service interval (WSI), which negatively impacts reproductive efficiency and farm profitability. This study aimed to identify critical risk factors associated with prolonged WSI (>6 days) in first-parity Landrace × Yorkshire sows raised under tropical conditions.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using production records from 3,222 sows on a commercial farm in Central Vietnam. Data on age at first artificial insemination, age at first farrowing (AFF), lactation length (LL), litter size at weaning (LSW), number born alive (NBA), and litter birth weight (LBW) were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of prolonged WSI.

Results:

Prolonged WSI was observed in 34.6% of sows. Multivariate analysis identified three significant predictors: (1) Early AFF (302–360 days) was associated with higher odds of prolonged WSI compared to older age groups (odds ratio [OR] range: 0.38–0.51, p < 0.001). (2) Short LL (12–22 days) increased WSI risk, while LL of 25–26 days had the lowest risk (OR = 0.39, p < 0.001). (3) Higher LSW (≥12 piglets) was positively associated with prolonged WSI (OR = 1.41–1.63, p < 0.05). NBA and LBW were not significantly associated with prolonged WSI.

Conclusions:

Early AFF, shorter LL, and larger LSW are key risk factors for prolonged WSI. Management practices that optimize gilt development (target AFF >360 days), extend lactation to ~25 days, and avoid excessive LSW (>11 piglets) may reduce WSI and enhance reproductive performance under tropical conditions.

Keywords: age at first farrowing, lactation length, litter size at weaning, primiparous sows, reproductive performance, tropical swine production, weaning-to-service interval

INTRODUCTION

Primiparous sows represent a significant propo-rtion of breeding herds worldwide [13]. Unlike multi- parous sows, they continue to grow during both gestation and their first lactation cycle [46]. As such, their nutritional and energy requirements must sup-port not only fetal development and milk production but also their own somatic growth [7, 8]. However, primiparous sows typically exhibit lower feed intake during lactation and experience greater losses in body weight, backfat, adipose tissue, and protein rese-rves compared to their multiparous counterparts [9]. These physiological challenges predispose them to reproductive inefficiencies, including second litter syndrome, reported in approximately 46%–57% of sows [1012], and extended weaning-to-service inter-vals (WSI) [9, 1315].

The WSI is a critical reproductive metric that influences overall productivity, especially under both tropical and temperate conditions. Prolonged WSI contributes substantially to non-productive days in sow herds [16]. Studies conducted in Japan and Thailand have demonstrated that WSI affects farrowing rates [17, 18], litter sizes [19, 20], and culling rates [21]. For instance, in tropical settings, sows inseminated within 0–6 days post-weaning had significantly higher farrowing rates than those mated after 7–20 days (86.8% vs. 78.9%) [17]. A similar pattern was observed under temperate climates, where farrowing rates dropped from 85% to 72% when insemination occurred after 6 days [18]. In Brazil, peak farrowing rates were recorded in sows bred 3–5 days post-weaning, regardless of parity status [22]. In addition, larger litter sizes and reduced culling rates were observed in sows served within 1–5 or 4–6 days post-weaning compared to those bred beyond day 6 or 7 in both Thai and Japanese herds [18, 20, 21].

Several risk factors associated with prolonged WSI have been extensively studied. Research from Australia, the United States, China, and the Netherlands indicates an inverse relationship between lactation length (LL) and WSI [15, 23–25], although some exce-ptions exist, such as a positive association reported in Brazilian herds [26]. Consistent findings from Thailand, Vietnam, Lithuania, and the Netherlands suggest that higher parity is associated with a reduction in WSI duration [13–14, 25, 27]. Contrasting results have been reported regarding litter size at weaning (LSW); some studies, such as those by Vesseur et al. [25] and Sterning et al. [28], describe a positive relationship with WSI, while a study by Alexopoulos et al. [29] reports a negative correlation. Moreover, excessive weight loss during lactation has been shown to delay the return to estrus and extend WSI [28, 30, 31].

Emerging data from Vietnam highlight a negative association between litter size at birth and WSI [27, 32], contradicting earlier findings from Sweden [28]. Other potential contributors to prolonged WSI include enviro-nmental and management-related factors such as housing systems [25], seasonal effects [14, 25], age at puberty [33], temperature-humidity index [3335], gilt body weight at first mating [7], and nutritional strategies [8]. Reproductive parameters such as split suckling [36], manual farrowing assistance, stillbirth occurrence, vaginal discharge duration, and gestation length have also been explored [27]. Serenius et al. [37] have focused specifically on how the age at first insemination and age at first farrowing (AFF) influence WSI outcomes in primiparous sows.

Despite the extensive literature exploring factors influencing the WSI in sows, the majority of existing studies have focused on mixed-parity populations or multiparous sows, with limited attention given exclu- sively to primiparous sows – a group inherently different in physiological and metabolic profiles. Primiparous sows, due to their continued growth and immature reproductive systems, are more vulne-rable to postpartum reproductive disorders, including prolonged WSI. In addition, while variables such as LL, LSW, body weight changes, environmental stress, and nutritional management have been associated with WSI outcomes, the specific influence of early-life reproductive traits – particularly age at first artificial insemination (AFAI) and AFF – remains underexplored. These factors may be critical in shaping postpartum reproductive performance, especially under tropical climatic conditions where heat stress and seasonal variation further compromise sow fertility.

Moreover, previous findings on the effects of LSW and litter size at birth on WSI have been inconsistent and sometimes contradictory across geographic and environmental contexts. Some studies report posi-tive associations, while others suggest negative or no significant correlations. The majority of such work has been conducted in temperate climates, with limited data from tropical, high-humidity environments, which present additional physiological challenges. Thus, there is a significant need for region-specific, parity-specific, and climate-contextualized investigations that clarify the predictors of prolonged WSI in commercial sow operations.

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the risk factors associated with prolonged WSI in prim-iparous Landrace × Yorkshire sows managed under tropical conditions in Central Vietnam. Specifically, it seeks to: (1) Quantify the effect of AFAI and AFF on the likelihood of prolonged WSI. (2) Assess the influence of LL and LSW on post-weaning reproductive recovery. (3) Identify optimal thresholds for key management parameters (e.g., LL and AFF) that may minimize the risk of prolonged WSI without compromising lifetime productivity.

By focusing on a large dataset from a commercial herd (n = 3,222 sows), this study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to enhance repro-ductive efficiency, guide gilt development strategies, and optimize herd productivity in tropical production systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical approval

This retrospective study utilized existing farm production records and did not involve any direct interv-entions or experimental procedures involving animals. Therefore, formal ethical approval was not required. Nonetheless, all data collection procedures adhered to standard ethical guidelines for the use of animals in research.

Study period and location

The study was conducted from August to Dece-mber 2024 on a commercial swine farm located in the central region of Vietnam, comprising approximately 5,000 crossbred Landrace × Yorkshire breeding sows. The sows included in the analysis were born between October 2022 and March 2023, with their first farrowing and lactation periods occurring between October 2023 and July 2024. The regional climate is characterized by an average annual temperature of 22°C–29°C and relative humidity of approximately 85%–86%.

Herd health and breeding management

Before breeding, gilts were vaccinated accor-ding to standard protocols against porcine circovirus, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, foot-and-mouth disease, Aujeszky’s disease virus, porcine parvovirus, class-ical swine fever, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, and Esch-erichia coli. Gilts were group-housed until puberty and inseminated during their second or third estrus once they reached a minimum body weight of 135 kg. Inseminations were conducted twice using fresh semen (≥75% motility; ≥3 billion sperm cells/dose).

Post-breeding, sows were revaccinated agai-nst key pathogens. During gestation, sows received 2.2–2.4 kg/day of a commercial diet containing ~14% crude protein and 15 MJ/kg metabolizable energy. During lactation, sows were fed ad libitum on a diet con-taining ~16% crude protein and similar energy levels. Feed allowances after weaning were 2.5–3.0 kg/day, adjusted according to body condition.

Farrowing and lactation management

Natural farrowing was allowed; however, if sows did not farrow by day 116 of gestation, parturition was induced using 175 μg cloprostenol (Hanprost, Hanvet, Vietnam). Dystocic sows were assisted with oxytocin (20 IU, DonaVet, Vietnam) or manual extraction when necessary. Cloprostenol and oxytocin were administered through the perivulvar route.

Cross-fostering was conducted within the first 24 h after birth; split suckling was not performed. Prew-eaning mortality was approximately 7%. Sows were weaned after an average of 25 days, with 9% weaned before 21 days.

Post-weaning management and estrus detection

Following weaning, sows received a vitamin A, D, and E injection (500,000 IU A, 250,000 IU D, 120 mg E; 6 mL; DonaVet, Vietnam) and were exposed to intact Meishan boars for a minimum of 6 h/day (1 boar/12 sows). Estrus detection was conducted once daily using the backpressure test in the presence of a boar.

Sows not exhibiting estrus within 7 days post-weaning received a second vitamin ADE injection. If estrus was still absent by day 14, a fasting regimen on alternate days was initiated. For sows not returning to estrus by days 18–21, hormonal induction was applied using 400 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin and 200 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (Heat 5×, Dong Bang Co., Ltd., Korea), administered intramuscularly into the neck. Lighting and boar exposure durations were increased to 12 and 16 h/day, respectively, in refractory cases.

Data collection and variable definition

An Excel database (Microsoft Office 2016, Wash-ington, USA) containing records from 7,590 gilts and sows was provided by the farm. Of these, 3,222 primiparous sows had complete records on:

  • Date of first artificial insemination

  • Date of first farrowing

  • Number born alive (NBA, piglets) Only live-born piglets with birth weights >0.85 kg were included, which may underestimate total live births and LBW.

  • Litter birth weight (LBW, kg)

  • Date of weaning

  • LSW

  • Date of first post-weaning service.

From these records, the following variables were computed:

  • AFAI (days)

  • AFF (days)

  • LL (days)

  • WSI (days).

Prolonged WSI was defined as >6 days based on classifications by Yatabe et al. [38] and Hoshino and Koketsu [18], which link longer intervals to reduced farrowing rates.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., NY, USA). A two-stage logistic regression approach was employed:

  • 1.Univariate analysis to assess associations between each independent variable and prolonged WSI.

  • 2.Multivariate logistic regression using forward step-wise selection for variables meeting the threshold of p < 0.20.

Independent variables were categorized as follows:

  • AFAI: 189–240, 241–250, 251–260, 261–270, 271–280, 280–436 days

  • AFF: 302–360, 361–370, 371–380, 381–390, 391–400, 400–554 days

  • NBA: <6, 6–10, 11–15, 16–21 piglets

  • LBW: <10, 10–15, 15–18, >18 kg

  • LL: 12–22, 23–24, 25–26, 27–28, >28 days

  • LSW: <11, 11, 12, 13, 14–18 piglets.

Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Variables with high multicollinearity (Spearman’s ρ ≥ 0.70) were excluded – AFAI was dropped due to its strong correlation with AFF (ρ = 0.97).

Model performance was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and Nagelkerke R2. Model selection was guided by the Akaike infor-mation criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was computed to assess discriminatory ability. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed).

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics

The average WSI among the 3,222 primiparous sows was 8.7 ± 8.0 days, with 34.6% (1,114/3,222) exhibiting a prolonged WSI (>6 days). The mean AFAI and AFF were 267.7 ± 32.2 days and 384.6 ± 32.3 days, respectively. The average LBW and LL were 16.0 ± 3.4 kg and 25.1 ± 3.4 days, respectively. The mean NBA and LSW were 12.6 ± 2.7 and 12.3 ± 1.5, respectively.

The incidence of prolonged WSI varied across AFAI groups, with the highest rate observed in sows inseminated between 189 and 240 days (56.7%, 242/427). This proportion decreased to 40.8% in the 241–250 day group (156/382) and ranged from 28.3% to 31.9% in those inseminated after 250 days.

A similar trend was observed for AFF, where the youngest group (302–360 days) had the highest incidence of prolonged WSI (55.0%, 298/542). This rate decreased progressively in older age groups, with the lowest incidence recorded in the 381–390 day group (26.4%, 174/660).

No clear pattern was evident across the NBA or LBW categories. The incidence of prolonged WSI across NBA groups ranged from 31.0% (18/58) to 39.1% (133/340), and for LBW groups, from 32.0% (425/1,328) to 39.1% (261/667).

In contrast, LL was inversely associated with prolonged WSI. Sows with a short LL of 12–22 days had the highest incidence (53.7%, 376/700), which decreased to 34.0% (201/592) in those with a LL of 23–24 days and remained relatively stable between 26.8% and 28.9% in sows with LL longer than 24 days.

Regarding LSW, the incidence of prolonged WSI increased with the number of piglets weaned, rising from 29.6% (75/253) in sows weaning fewer than 11 piglets to 40.5% (202/499) in those weaning 14 or more (Table 1).

Table 1.

Univariate analysis of potential risk factors for prolonged weaning-to-service interval in 3,222 primiparous Landrace × Yorkshire crossbred sows.

Factors Incidence OR (95%CI) p-value
AFAI (days)
 189–240 56.7 (242/427) 1
 241–250 40.8 (156/382) 0.53 (0.40–0.70) <0.001
 251–260 31.9 (183/574) 0.36 (0.28–0.46) <0.001
 261–270 28.3 (189/667) 0.30 (0.23–0.39) <0.001
 271–280 29.0 (145/500) 0.2 (0.24–0.41) <0.001
 280–436 29.6 (199/672) 0.32 (0.25–0.41) <0.001
AFF (days)
 302–360 55.0 (298/542) 1
 361–370 35.6 (147/413) 0.45 (0.35–0.59) <0.001
 371–380 31.9 (197/618) 0.38 (0.20–0.49) <0.001
 381–390 26.4 (174/660) 0.29 (0.23–0.37) <0.001
 391–400 31.1 (127/409) 0.37 (0.28–0.48) <0.001
 400–554 29.5 (171/580) 0.34 (0.27–0.44) <0.001
NBA
 NBA <6 31.0 (18/58) 1
 NBA=6–10 35.3 (208/569) 1.21 (0.68–2.17) 0.514
 NBA=11–15 33.8 (762/2255) 1.13 (0.65–1.99) 0.661
 NBA=16–21 39.1 (133/340) 1.43 (0.79–2.60) 0.243
LBW (kg)
 <10 35.5 (66/186) 1
 10–15 34.8 (362/1041) 0.97 (0.70–1.34) 0.852
 15–18 32.0 (425/1328) 0.86 (0.62–1.18) 0.343
 >18 39.1 (261/667) 1.17 (0.83–1.64) 0.366
LL (days)
 12–22 53.7 (376/700) 1
 23–24 34.0 (201/592) 0.44 (0.35–0.56) < 0.001
 25–26 27.5 (231/841) 0.33 (0.26–0.40) < 0.001
 27–28 28.9 (195/675) 0.35 (0.28–044) < 0.001
 >28 26.8 (111/414) 0.32 (0.24–0.41) < 0.001
LSW (piglets)
 <11 29.6 (75/253) 1
 11 32.2 (131/407) 1.13 (0.80–1.58) 0.493
 12 33.1 (361/1090) 1.18 (0.87–1.58) 0.288
 13 35.5 (345/973) 1.30 (0.97–1.76) 0.083
 14–18 40.5 (202/499) 1.61 (1.17–2.23) 0.004

OR=Odds ratio, 95% CI=95% confidence interval, P=Probability, AFAI=Age at first artificial insemination, AFF=Age at first farrowing, NBA=Number born alive, LBW=Litter birth weight, LL=Lactation length, LSW=Litter size at weaning

Univariate analysis

Univariate logistic regression identified significant associations between prolonged WSI and the following factors: AFAI, AFF, LL, and LSW (p < 0.05). No significant associations were found between prolonged WSI and either NBA or LBW (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

Multivariate analysis

The final multivariate logistic regression model included LL, AFF, and LSW as independent predictors of prolonged WSI (Table 2). The model’s explanatory power increased with the addition of each variable, as indicated by the Nagelkerke R2 values of 0.062, 0.090, and 0.094 for one-, two-, and three-variable models, respectively. Correspondingly, AIC values declined from 4010.857 to 3936.172, and BIC values from 4023.010 to 3960.483, indicating improved model fit.

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for prolonged weaning-to-service interval in 3,222 primiparous Landrace×Yorkshire crossbred sows.

Factors OR (95%CI) p-value
LL at first parity (days)
 12–22 1
 23–24 0.50 (0.40–0.63) <0.001
 25–26 0.39 (0.32–0.49) <0.001
 27–28 0.43 (0.34–0.54) <0.001
 >28 0.39 (0.30–0.51) <0.001
AFF (days)
 302–360 1
 361–370 0.51 (0.39–0.67) <0.001
 371–380 0.49 (0.38–0.62) <0.001
 381–390 0.38 (0.29–0.48) <0.001
 391–400 0.49 (0.37–0.65) <0.001
 400–554 0.43 (0.33–0.55) <0.001
LSW (piglets)
 <11 1
 11 1.22 (0.85–1.74) 0.279
 12 1.41 (1.04–1.93) 0.029
 13 1.46 (1.07–1.99) 0.018
 14–18 1.63 (1.17–2.29) 0.004

OR=Odds ratio, 95% CI=95% confidence interval, P=Probability, LL=Lactation length, AFF=Age at first farrowing, LSW=Litter size at weaning

A mild but statistically significant correlation was observed between AFF and LL (Spearman’s ρ = 0.198, p < 0.001), confirming the absence of multicollinearity. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded p = 0.15, indicating good model calibration. The model’s discriminatory capacity, assessed by the AUC, was 0.736, suggesting moderate predictive ability.

AFAI was excluded from the final model due to its strong collinearity with AFF (Spearman’s ρ = 0.970, p < 0.001).

Significant predictors of prolonged WSI

Both AFF and LL demonstrated a significant negative association with prolonged WSI:

  • Sows with an AFF of 302–360 days were at greater risk of prolonged WSI compared to older age groups:

    • 361–370 days: OR = 0.51 (95% CI: 0.39–0.67, p < 0.001)
    • 371–380 days: OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.38–0.62, p < 0.001)
    • 381–390 days: OR = 0.38 (95% CI: 0.29–0.48, p < 0.001)
    • 391–400 days: OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.37–0.65, p < 0.001)
    • 400–554 days: OR = 0.43 (95% CI: 0.33–0.55, p < 0.001).
  • Sows with shorter LL (12–22 days) were significantly more likely to have prolonged WSI than those with longer LL:

    • 23–24 days: OR = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.40–0.63, p < 0.001)
    • 25–26 days: OR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.32–0.49, p < 0.001)
    • 27–28 days: OR = 0.43 (95% CI: 0.34–0.54, p < 0.001)
    • 28 days: OR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.30–0.51, p < 0.001).

LSW showed a positive association with prolonged WSI:

  • Compared to sows weaning <11 piglets:

  • 12 piglets: OR = 1.41 (95% CI: 1.04–1.93, p = 0.029)

  • 13 piglets: OR = 1.46 (95% CI: 1.07–1.99, p = 0.018)

  • 14–18 piglets: OR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.17–2.29, p = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

Comparison of WSI with previous studies

The average WSI observed in this study (8.7 days) aligns closely with prior reports on primiparous sows. Previous research has documented average WSIs of 8.5 days in Thailand [13], 10.3 days in another Thai herd [21], 8.1 days in the United States [39], and 11.34 days in Lithuanian herds [14], confirming the consistency of these findings across diverse geographic and management conditions.

LL and its physiological implications

The inverse relationship between LL and WSI observed in this study corroborates earlier find-ings [27, 34]. One likely explanation is that extended lactation allows for improved energy balance and reduced body weight loss in primiparous sows [31, 40]. In fact, sows may begin regaining weight during days 28–35 of lactation [41], which aids in recovery from the physiological demands of lactation and prepares them for subsequent estrus [40].

Longer lactation periods may also mitigate the effects of heat stress on reproductive performance [34] and stimulate pre- and post-weaning luteinizing horm-one (LH) secretion [42]. As antral follicles exceeding 4–5 mm become increasingly LH-dependent [43], elevated LH may enhance follicular growth, increase β-estradiol concentrations in follicular fluid [44], and facilitate earlier estrus onset. The data from this study support these mechanisms, as sows with LLs longer than 22 days exhibited markedly lower WSI incidence, with the optimal benefit observed at 25–26 days, consistent with prior recommendations [45]. This finding offers a practical guideline for herd reproductive management under tropical conditions.

Impact of LSW on WSI

A positive correlation was also evident between LSW and prolonged WSI, echoing earlier research [25, 36, 46]. Experimental studies have shown that reducing litter size late in lactation improves post-weaning repr-oductive outcomes. For example, split suckling involving only 5–7 piglets after day 21 shortened the weaning-to-estrus interval by a full day [46], and reducing the litter size to 4 piglets from day 18 to weaning reduced the interval from 5.6 to 4.6 days compared to sows with larger litters [36].

Larger LSWs contribute to more pronounced body weight loss during lactation [40], which has been linked to delayed follicular development [23] and increased WSI duration [28, 30, 31]. Thus, managing litter size near weaning may be a critical factor for optimizing post-weaning reproductive efficiency.

Age at first insemination and farrowing as risk factors

The higher incidence of prolonged WSI among sows with an AFAI of 189–240 days and an AFF of 302–360 days suggests that younger gilts may not have attained full physical maturity at the time of first service. This aligns with the findings of Carrión-López et al. [7], who observed that increasing gilt body weight from <135 kg to >150 kg at first service reduced the median WSI from 5 to 4 days.

Primiparous sows must allocate energy toward fetal growth, lactation, and their own body development simultaneously [8]. Those inseminated or farrowed at a younger age likely require more nutrients for somatic growth, rendering them more susceptible to energy deficits during lactation. This nutritional stress may compromise post-weaning recovery, thereby increasing the risk of prolonged WSI.

Lack of association with NBA and LBW

In contrast to some previous studies by Nam and Sukon [27, 32], this study found no significant relationship between NBA and prolonged WSI. A likely explanation lies in the methodological differences: While earlier studies considered all live-born piglets, the present study excluded those weighing <0.85 kg, potentially underestimating NBA and introducing a classification bias.

Similarly, LBW was not associated with WSI. This may be explained by the strong positive correlation between LBW and NBA (Spearman ρ = 0.87, p < 0.001), which could confound the independent effect of LBW on WSI duration.

CONCLUSION

This study identified key predictors of prolonged WSI in 3,222 primiparous Landrace × Yorkshire sows managed under tropical conditions. The average WSI was 8.7 days, with 34.6% of sows experiencing a prolonged interval (>6 days). Multivariate analysis reve-aled that early AFF (302–360 days), short LL (≤22 days), and large LSW (≥12 piglets) significantly increased the risk of prolonged WSI. In contrast, LLs of 25–26 days and AFFs beyond 361 days were associated with a lower incidence of delayed post-weaning estrus.

Practical implications of these findings include refining gilt management strategies to delay breeding until adequate body maturity (e.g., AFF > 361 days), extending lactation periods to at least 25 days, and cautious management of weaning litter sizes to mitigate excessive metabolic drain. These management adjustments may contribute to reduced non-productive days and improved reproductive efficiency in tropical herd settings.

The strengths of this study lie in its large, uniform cohort of first-parity sows, the comprehensive nature of the on-farm production data, and the context-specific analysis conducted under tropical environmental conditions – an area underrepresented in the current literature.

However, several limitations must be ackn-owledged. The study was conducted on a single comm-ercial farm, which may affect external validity. Excluding data for piglets under 0.85 kg could underestimate litter parameters, and the absence of physiological indicators, such as hormonal profiles, body condition scores, or stress markers, limits mechanistic interpretations. In addition, lactational estrus – an influential but unm-easured variable – could not be factored into WSI assessments.

Future research should incorporate multi-farm datasets across diverse climatic regions and integrate physiological biomarkers, endocrine monitoring, and longitudinal reproductive tracking. Investigating genetic predispositions to prolonged WSI and evaluating the cost-benefit impact of varying LL and AFF thresholds on sow lifetime productivity would further advance this field.

This study provides novel evidence supporting the role of AFF, lactation duration, and LSW as critical determinants of prolonged WSI in primiparous sows under tropical management. These insights pro- vide practical recommendations to optimize gilt develop- ment, enhance sow reproductive performance, and improve productivity in commercial swine operations in heat-stressed regions.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The supplementary data can be made available from the corresponding author upon request.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

NHN, DTKL, NVT, BVD, and PS: Conceived and designed the study. NHN: Collected data. NHN and PS: Analyzed data, interpreted the results, and drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the farm owners for their consent to data collection and to the veterinarians for their assistance in data collection. The authors did not receive any funds for this study.

Footnotes

We are grateful to the farm owners for their consent to data collection and to the veterinarians for their assistance in data collection. The authors did not receive any funds for this study.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

PUBLISHER’S NOTE

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in the published institutional affiliations.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sanz-Fernández S, Díaz-Gaona C, Simões J, Casas-Rosal J.C, Alòs N, Tusell L, Quintanilla R, Rodríguez-Estévez V. The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms. Porcine Health Manag. 2024;10:56. doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00406-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Muniz H.C.M, Ceron M.S, Fraga B.N, Pacheco P.S, Gasa-Gasó J, Oliveira V. Modelling the impact of sow replacement rate on farm performance. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2024;53:e20230037. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wijesiriwardana U.A, Craig J.R, Cottrell J.J, Dunshea F.R, Pluske J.R. Animal board invited review:Factors affecting the early growth and development of gilt progeny compared to sow progeny. Animals (Basel) 2022;16(8):100596. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Upadhaya S, Seok W, Kumar S, Van der Veen R, Kim I. Marine derived Ca-Mg complex supplementation basal diet during four subsequent parities improved longevity and performance of sows and their litters. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2023;65(3):562–578. doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Belkova J, Rozkot M. Gilt rearing impacts on sow performance and longevity-a review. J. Swine Health Prod. 2022;30(1):10–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kiszlinger H.N, Hovarth A. The effect of parity number on the growth performance of piglets around weaning. Acta Agrar. Kaposvariensis. 2021;25(2):7–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carrión-López M.J, Madrid J, Martínez S, Hernández F, Orengo J. Effects of the feeding level in early gestation on body reserves and the productive and reproductive performance of primiparous and multiparous sows. Res. Vet. Sci. 2022;148:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carrión-López M.J, Orengo J. Effect of sow body weight at first service on body status and performance during first parity and lifetime. Animals (Basel) 2022;12(23):3399. doi: 10.3390/ani12233399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Strathe A.V, Bruun T.S, Hansen C.F. Sows with high milk production had both a high feed intake and high body mobilization. Animal. 2017;11:1913–1921. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nam N.H, Khoudphaithoune T, Lanh D.T.K, Thanh N.V, Truong N.D, Toan N.C, Dung B.V, Dao B.T.A, Sukon P. Effects of second litter syndrome on reproductive performance in sows. Vet. World. 2024;17(8):1680–1684. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1680-1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sanz-Fernández S, Díaz-Gaona C, Casas-Rosal J.C, Quintanilla R, López P, Alòs N, Rodríguez-Estévez V. Second litter syndrome in Iberian pig breed:Factors influencing the performance. Animal. 2022;16(12):100675. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sell-Kubiak E, Knol E.F, Mulder H.A, Pszczola M. Unraveling the actual background of second litter syndrome in pigs:Based on Large White data. Animal. 2021;15(2):100033. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chansomboon C, Elzo M, Suwanasopee T, Koonawootrittriron S. Genetic and environ-mental factors affecting weaning-to-first service inte-rval in a landrace-large white swine population in Northern Thailand. Kasetsart J. 2009;43:669–679. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karvelienė B, Šernienė L, Riškevičienė V. Effect of different factors on weaning-to-first-service interval in Lithuanian pig herds. Vet. Zootec. 2008;41(63):64–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koketsu Y, Dial G.D. Factors associated with prolonged weaning-to-mating interval among sows on farms that wean pigs early. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1997a;211(7):894–898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Segura-Correa J, Ek-Mex J.E, Muñoz-Osorio G, Santos-Ricalde R, Sarmiento-Franco L, Calderón-Diaz J.A. Associations between first parity weaning to service interval and sow lifetime productivity traits. TSAES. 2023;26:64. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tummaruk P, Tantasuparuk W, Techakumphu M, Kunavongkrit A. Influence of repeat-service and weaning-to-first-service interval on farrowing proportion of gilts and sows. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010;96(3–4):194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoshino Y, Koketsu Y. A repeatability assessment of sows mated 4-6 days after weaning in breeding herds. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008;108(1–2):22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tummaruk P, Lundeheim N, Einarsson S, Dalin A.M. Reproductive performance of purebred Swedish landrace and Swedish Yorkshire sows:II. Effect of mating type, weaning-to-first-service interval and lactation length. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 2000;50(3):217–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tantasuparuk W, Lundeheim N, Dalin A.M, Kunavongkrit A, Einarsson S. Effects of lactation length and weaning-to-service interval on subsequent farrowing rate and litter size in Landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand. Theriogenology. 2000;54(9):1525–1536. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00472-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tantasuparuk W, Lundeheim N, Dalin A.M, Kunavongkrit A, Einarsson S. Weaning-to-service interval in primiparous sows and its relationship with longevity and piglet production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001b;69(2):155–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Poleze E, Bernardi M.L, Amaral Filha W.S, Wentz I, Bortolozzo F.P. Consequences of variation in weaning-to-estrus interval on reproductive performance of swine females. Livest. Sci. 2006;103(1–2):124–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu K, Zhang L, Xu X, Song M, Ding H, Xiao L, Wen J, Zhou C, Bai J, Liu Y. Lactational high weight loss impairs follicular development by causing mitochondrial dysfunction of ovarian cells in sows and mitigated by butyrate supplement. J. Adv. Res. 2025 doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.01.050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2025.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bertoldo M, Grupen C.G, Thomson P.C, Evans G, Holyoake P.K. Identification of sow-specific risk factors for late pregnancy loss during the seasonal infertility period in pigs. Theriogenology. 2009;72(3):393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vesseur P.C, Kemp B, Den Hatog L.A. Factors affecting the weaning-to-estrus interval in the sow. J. Anim. Physiol. A Anim. Nutr. 1994;72:225–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Leite C.D, Lui J.F, Albuquerque L.G, Alves D.N. Environmental and genetic factors affecting the weaning-estrus interval in sows. Genet. Mol. Res. 2011;10(4):2692–2701. doi: 10.4238/2011.November.4.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nam N.H, Sukon P. Factors associated with weaning to service interval in the sow. Int. J. Vet. Sci. 2025;14(3):565–570. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sterning M, Rydhmer L, Eliasson L, Einarsson S, Anderson K. A study on primiparous sows of the ability to show standing oestrus and to ovulate after weaning. Influences of loss of body weight and backfat during lactation and of litter size, litter weight gain and season. Acta Vet. Scand. 1990;31(2):227–236. doi: 10.1186/BF03547566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alexopoulos C, Karagiannidis A, Kritas S.K, Boscos C, Georgoulakis I.E, Kyriakis S.C. Field evaluation of a bioregulator containing live Bacillus cereus spores on health status and performance of sows and their litters. J. Vet. Med. A Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 2001;48(3):137–145. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00342.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thaker M.Y.C, Bilkei G. Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005;88(3–4):309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tantasuparuk W, Dalin A, Lundeheim N, Kunavongkrit A, Einarsson S. Body weight loss during lactation and its influence on weaning-to-service interval and ovulation rate in Landrace and Yorkshire sows in the tropical environment of Thailand. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2001a;65(3–4):273–281. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00218-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nam N.H, Sukon P. Mutual relationship between litter size and weaning to first service interval in the sow. Int. J. Vet. Sci. 2023;12(5):672–675. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sterning M, Rydhmer L, Eliasson-Selling L. Relationships between age at puberty and interval from weaning to estrus and between estrus signs at puberty and after the first weaning in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1998;76(2):353–359. doi: 10.2527/1998.762353x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Iida R, Piñeiro C, Koketsu Y. Timing and temperature thresholds of heat stress effects on fertility performance of different parity sows in Spanish herds. J. Anim. Sci. 2021;99(7):1–11. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Iida R, Koketsu Y. Quantitative associations between outdoor climate data and weaning-to-first-mating interval or adjusted 21-day litter weights during summer in Japanese swine breeding herds. Livest. Sci. 2013;152(2–3):253–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zak L, Foxcroft G.R, Aherne F.X, Kirkwood R.N. Role of luteinizing hormone in primiparous sow responses to split weaning. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008;43(4):445–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00932.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Serenius T, Stalder K.J, Fernando R.L. Genetic associations of sow longevity with age at first farrowing, number of piglets weaned and wean to insemination interval in the Finnish Landrace swine population. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86(12):3324–3329. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yatabe Y, Iida R, Piñeiro C, Koketsu Y. Recurrence patterns and lifetime performance of parity 1 sows in breeding herds with different weaning-to-first-mating intervals. Porcine Health Manag. 2019;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s40813-019-0122-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koketsu Y, Dial G.D. Factors influencing the postweaning reproductive performance of sows on commercial farms. Theriogenology. 1997b;47(7):1445–1461. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(97)00135-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guo J.Y, Sun Y, DeDecker A.E, Coffey M.T, Kim S.W. Effect of suckling intensity of primiparous sows on production performance during current and subsequent parities1. J. Anim. Sci. 2019;97(12):4845–4854. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rojkittikhun T, Einarsson S, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Edqvist L.E. Body weight loss during lactation in relation to energy and protein metabolism in standard-fed primiparous sows. Zentralbl. Veterinarmed. A. 1993;40(4):249–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1993.tb00625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Koketsu Y, Dial G.D, Pettigrew J.E, Xue J, Yang H, Lucia T. Influence of lactation length and feed intake on reproductive performance and blood concentrations of glucose, insulin and luteinizing hormone in primiparous sows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1998;52:153–163. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(98)00093-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Knox R.V. Follicle development in pigs:State of the art. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2023;90(7):480–490. doi: 10.1002/mrd.23576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Costermans N.G.J, Soede N.M, Van Tricht F, Blockland M, Kemp B, Keijer J, Teerds K.J. Follicular fluid steroid profile in sows:Relationship to follicle size and oocyte quality. Biol. Reprod. 2020;102(3):740–749. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mabry J, Matt S, Culbertson M, Reeves D. Effects of lactation length on weaning-to-first-service interval, first-service farrowing rate and subsequent litter size. J. Swine Health Prod. 1996;4(4):185–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tarocco C, De Rensis F, Kirwood R, Yang R. Effect of split-weaning interval on return to estrus and sow fertility. Swine Health Prod. 2000;8(5):221–223. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The supplementary data can be made available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES