Abstract
Numerous commensal microbes colonize in the pig gut, while the microbiota gets benefits from the gut environment, it additionally assists significantly with the host’s development, metabolism, and immunity. The immune system can regulate the homeostasis of gut microorganisms by secreting a variety of effector factors. Similarly, gut microorganisms can also regulate the intestinal immune system via specific components or metabolites. Despite their close relationship, microbes and immune cells have their own individual ecological niche in the gut. Microbes are confined to the intestinal lumen, while immune cells are located in the intestinal tissues, and the mechanisms of how they interact with each other to promote intestinal health have not yet been thoroughly investigated. This article focuses on the different mechanisms by the interaction between intestinal immune system, gut microorganisms and microbial metabolites to regulate the intestinal health of piglets, and discusses the strategies to enhance the intestinal health of piglets through dietary interventions in order to provide theoretical support promoting the healthy growth of piglets.
Keywords: Gut Microbes, Immunomodulation, Intestinal Health, Microbial Regulation
INTRODUCTION
Gut microbes play a significant role in influencing the physiological state of the body through complex interactions. A stable microecosystem is critical for intestinal physiological and biochemical processes [1]. However, environmental factors and internal dysfunction can destroy this stability and balance, leading to immune dysregulation and impaired intestinal barrier function. Currently, the gut microbes have been shown to have a significant impact on the regulation of immune systems [2].
Complex interactions exist among intestinal microflora, intestinal epithelium and mucosal immune system. Symbiotic microorganisms in the gut can stimulate the proliferation of lymphocytes through their antigens to promote the development of body resistance, and can also modulate host physiology by producing diverse metabolites. For instance, Lactobacillus in the intestine can use Trp to promote their proliferation and produce indole. Indole, an aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) ligand, can activate the AHR-interleukin (IL) 22 axis to balance the mucosal response and maintain intestinal health [3]. Similarly, intestine cells can regulate flora and immunity by secreting active substances. Intestinal cells generate intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP), which is essential for preventing intestinal inflammation, regulating gut flora distribution, and inhibiting bacterial translocation [4]. Under stress conditions, including weaning, the production of IAP in pigs will be significantly inhibited, which is the reason for the occurrence of many different post-weaning diseases and the increased sensitivity to intestinal infection [5]. In fact, the complex interactions among nutrients, intestinal immunity and the microflora are the most important elements influencing the intestinal health of piglets. Identifying the critical targets for controlling intestinal health requires an in-depth comprehension of the impact of the gut microbes and immune system. With the goal of providing a theoretical foundation for the development of more sensible and successful methods of gut health regulation in the future, this study discusses some of the current approaches to gut health regulation and gives a thorough overview of the effects of intestinal immunity, gut microbes, and their metabolites on the intestinal health of piglets.
THE INTESTINAL IMMUNE SYSTEM AND GUT HEALTH OF PIGLETS
Piglets’ intestinal immune system is not fully mature at birth, and continues to develop during the perinatal period, and it reaches maturity at five to seven weeks after birth [6]. Three to eight weeks after birth is the critical period for T cell development in the piglets’ intestine [7]. During this period, piglets are particularly vulnerable to infections due to their immature intestinal immune systems [8]. Most piglets are weaned at a stage where their intestinal immune systems have not yet fully matured, which is an important reason why diarrhea occurs in piglets after weaning and further leads to high morbidity and mortality. The intestinal mucosa and mucus layer are essential components of intestinal immunity that regulate piglet intestinal health.
Intestinal mucosa and gut health
The intestinal mucosa is the main physical barrier to prevent bacteria and toxins from entering the digestive system, and is critically important for maintaining intestinal health. The mucosal immune system contains the largest reservoir of immune cells, which can quickly activate the immune response and protect the body from pathogenic infection [9]. Intestinal epithelial cells (IEC), Peyer’s patches (PP) and intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) are the main members of the intestinal mucosal immune system (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Intestinal mucosal immune system. Mucus produced by goblet cells serves to restrict microbial translocation by reducing direct contact between microorganisms and intestinal epithelial cells (IEC). Antimicrobial proteins such as defensins can be secreted by intestinal and goblet cells. Some bacterial antigens penetrating mucosal layer can be absorbed by dendritic cells (DCs) in the lamina propria of intestine. Immunoglobulin-A (IgA) is secreted into the intestinal cavity by plasma cells, which develop from B lymphocytes stimulated by DCs.
Intestinal epithelial cells and gut health
As part of the intestinal barrier, IEC can isolate the host from commensal bacteria to maintain intestinal homeostasis. In addition, IEC is essential for activating immune response [10]. The antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) secreted by IEC in piglets can regulate the immune system and enhance resistance to pathogenic bacteria [11]. Porcine beta-defensin (PBD) 2 is a type of AMP that may alleviate mucosal damage and inflammation caused by colitis, and the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway activated by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) can quickly boost PBD114 expression [12], which helps to regulate the homeostasis of intestinal epithelium in piglets. Within IEC, the signaling pathway mediated by NF-κB functions as a frontline sensor for contact with microorganisms, orchestrating immune homeostasis through balanced regulation, whereas its pathological overactivation initiates pro-inflammatory cascades that compromise tissue integrity. Porcine butyrophilin-like 5, which is present in the IEC, prevents p65-mediated NF-κB pathway activation [13].
Due to this particular position of the IEC at the crossroads of mediating the interactions between the gut microbe and the intestinal immune cells, this exchange between them has a far-reaching effect on the host’s overall health.
Intraepithelial lymphocytes and gut health
A group of lymphocytes residing within IEC, termed IEL, actively participate in intestinal barrier formation [14]. These lymphocytes are highly mobile, and active in the space between the epithelial layer and the basement membrane and its position is between adjacent epithelial cells in the lateral intercellular space and along the basal surface [15]. This positioning and movement mode allows them to start the immune response in time when the intestinal tract is infected by pathogens. Through mucosal vaccination, lymphocytes can create protective adaptive immunity [16], while some lymphocytes can provide immune protection against many bacteria through innate immune memory [17].
The intraepithelial compartment comprises two principal lymphocyte populations: intraepithelial T lymphocytes (T-IEL) and intraepithelial innate lymphoid cells (ILC). In the intestine of four to eight weeks old pigs, the amount of T-IEL increases with age, and these T cells have been proven to be of the αβ and γδ T cell lineages. As pigs get older, the composition of T-IEL differed between intestinal sites, with CD2CD8α γδ T cells and CD4++−CD8α αβ T cells making up about 78% of total T-IEL [7], however, functional significance that they represent needs further investigation.
Despite lacking T cell receptors, ILC mediate adaptive immune responses through mechanisms analogous to effector T cells [18]. The ILC family is categorized into three functional groups (group 1, group 2 and group 3), and their development requires the transcription factors inhibitor DNA binding 2 and nuclear factor IL-3 regulated [14,19]. Due to the lack of clear labelling and identification methods, there are few studies on pig intestinal ILCs. In order to identify the role of ILCs in the pig intestine, Wiarda et al [20] utilized single cell RNA sequencing to determine the gene expression profile and location background of the ILC1 and ILC3 in pig ileum. They found that the function of ILCs in pig ileum is similar to that in human and mouse intestines, such as the monitoring function of ILC1 in epithelium, and the role of ILC3 in immune defence, regulating microbial and gut associated lymphoid tissue development, and maintaining tissue homeostasis.
In piglets, IEL immune activation is usually related to increases in the number of IEL [21]. The recruitment and development of IEL are significantly influenced by the microbiota, and microbiota-influencing dietary supplements, which include probiotics and prebiotics, have an immune-modulatory effect on intestinal IEL in pigs [22,23]. Overall, IEL are a type of cell with plasticity potential. Intestinal environmental factors, including gut bacteria and their by-products, shape the immunological characteristics of IEL.
Peyer’s patch and gut health
Aggregations of lymphoid follicles within the intestinal mucosa, termed PP, constitute critical components of intestinal mucosal immunity. These organized lymphoid follicles function as immunological sensors of the intestine due to the fact that they transport luminal antigens and microorganisms into lymphoid tissues within the intestinal mucosa [24]. The small intestine of pigs has two types of PP. The PP in the lower portion of the ileum is known as the ileal PP (IPP), and it is made up of a series of closely grouped follicles rich in B cells, whereas the follicles in the jejunum PP (JPP) are independent.
The organogenesis of both JPP and IPP can be modulated separately in pigs. Following gut microbial colonization, the follicular architecture demonstrates enhanced maturation in JPP aggregates compared to IPP, which maintain structural stability throughout postnatal development [25]. Upon maturation, JPP begin to exert an immune role, producing a variety of immunoglobulin A (IgA) with the help of T cells and are critical for mucosal immunity [26,27]. Pigs’ IPP have distinctive characteristics that are not observed in other animals. Between the 76th and 91st day of embryo, the organogenesis of IPP started, and the expression of chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 13 and chemokine C-C motif ligand 19 increased, which is important for the recruitment of B cells and T cells in lymphoid tissues. After being born, IPP began to develop rapidly [28]. These findings indicate that particular alterations in pigs’ early intestinal environments may be connected to the peculiarities of IPP in pigs. In the absence of T cell help, the IPP of pigs seem to be the sites of the initial immune response that generates undiversified IgA. The binding of IL-21 to its receptor on B cells induces phosphorylation of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1 and STAT3. This activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway promotes plasma cell differentiation, ultimately enhancing secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) production [29]. This also serves as a reminder that stimulating PP to secrete antibodies by mucosal immunity is one of the tactics for protecting piglets. Furthermore, it aids in the growth and well-being of young pigs by facilitating their adaptation to abrupt and noteworthy modifications in their intestinal microbiome.
INTESTINAL MUCUS LAYER AND GUT HEALTH
The mucus layer, produced by goblet cells, is composed of an inner and outer layer, and serves as a physical barrier to protect the intestinal lumen from bacteria or other antigenic substances. The inner layer adheres to the epithelial cell to prevent bacterial invasion and contains AMPs, IgA and other molecules. The outer mucus layer is loose, which provides a habitat for microorganisms [30].
Intestinal mucus is primarily a reticular polymeric structure composed of highly O-glycosylated mucin [31]. In addition to providing certain bacteria with nutrients, these mucin-derived O-glycans safeguard the mucus layer against degradation by bacterial proteases [32]. Additionally, the polysaccharide structure of mucin provides binding sites for intestinal bacteria through its adhesive components [33]. Diarrhea in piglets will destroy the intestinal mucus layer, induce bacterial translocation and disrupt the intestinal microenvironment, making them more vulnerable to inflammation. The activation of inflammatory corpuscles of nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) in the colon of piglets with diarrhea is the primary cause of this condition, which leads to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, ultimately lead to intestinal inflammation [34]. Activated NLRP3 inflammatory vesicles can help combat certain pathogens, while excessive activation can lead to harmful inflammation. Mucin 2 (MUC2) and fraction III in pig intestinal mucin have strong antiviral activity, and calpain-1 (a new antiviral protein found in porcine intestinal mucus) produced by goblet cells has made a significant contribution to the antiviral activity of fraction III. Calpain-1, a calcium-activated cysteine protease, can bind and hydrolyse the S1 structural domain of viral proteins to inhibit viral invasion [35].
More research is showing most pathogens invade and infect the gut mucosa as their primary site of infection. One of the key strategies for preserving intestinal health is to strengthen the integrity of the intestinal mucus barrier. Although controlling intestinal immunity makes sense for improving piglets’ intestinal health, understanding the complex workings of the intestinal immune system is somewhat difficult. The presence of diverse immune cells within the intestine complicates the determination of their interactions and overall function. Determining the functions of various intestinal immune cells is the first step towards better understanding intestinal immunodynamics and their impact on intestinal health.
INTERACTION BETWEEN THE INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA AND IMMUNE SYSTEM
Intestinal microbial community consists of trillions of microorganisms, forming a mutually beneficial symbiotic connection with the host. Microbial colonization is an important factor affecting intestinal development. Germ-free (GF) animals’ intestinal immunity and barrier are not fully established due to the lack of microbial colonization, making them more susceptible to intestinal inflammation.
There are some gut bacteria that interact with the host through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). When pathogenic microorganisms enter the body, PRRs identify pathogen-associated molecular patterns and activate signaling transduction downstream, thereby stimulating the innate immunity [36]. Through PRRs, gut microorganisms can regulate the level of inflammatory-related genes and AMPs, and in turn, PRRs expression can also influence the gut microbiota in healthy or diseased conditions [37]. Different studies have confirmed the crucial role of gut microbial colonization on the evolution of PRRs.
Piglets show different expression patterns of TLRs in different intestines, with increased expression of TLR1, 2, 4, and 9 in the jejunum during the first week of life, whereas in the cecum, TLR9 is stably expressed at different time points, which may be associated with the different species of microorganisms in different intestinal segments [38,39]. Disruption of microbial communities in the gut can adversely affect the colonic epithelium. In newborn piglets, the destruction of microflora is characterized by the decrease of Proteobacteria and Fusobacteriota will significantly alter the epithelial function by reducing the intestinal epithelium’s innate immunological defense. During this process, the expression levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein and LPS sensors TLR4 in the colon epithelium of piglets were significantly reduced, and colon epithelial stem cells were destroyed [40]. When weaned piglets were exposed to plant-oriented microbiome, the expressions of TLR, NOD1 and cytokines in the jejunum increased, thereby activating intestinal defence and reducing mucosal permeability [41]. Besides PRRs, gut microbes are crucial for immunoglobulin synthesis. GF animals exhibit severely diminished IgA production by B cells residing in PP and lamina propria (LP), a deficit that is rapidly rectified upon microbial colonization [42,43]. Gut symbiotic bacteria may collaborate with dendritic cells (DCs) and IEC to promote the generation of IgA [44]. After application of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) isolated from healthy gut to newborn piglets, it was found that LGG could promote IgA production in LP, influence the composition of the Ig CDR3 region of B cells and promote B cell development. Exploration of the mechanism revealed that p40 protein from LGG could activate the epidermal growth factor receptor/protein kinase B (AKT) and NF-κB signaling pathways, and stimulate the B cells’ production of IgA [45]. Similarly, IgA can also regulate the colonization of intestinal microorganisms. The IgA response mediated by CD138 plasma cells can regulate the symbiotic relationship between Bacteroides uniformis (B. uniformis) and its host in the weaning period, which is very important for B. uniformis to occupy the intestinal niche. Furthermore, the lack of IgA caused a disruption in the intestinal niche occupied by B. uniformis, exacerbating intestinal inflammation in both weaned piglets and IgA-deficient mice [46]. By comparing the phenotype-transcriptome changes in intestinal PP between specific pathogen-free piglets and GF piglets, it was found that lack of symbiotic microflora would lead to PP hypoplasia in piglets, and that the microflora could significantly modulate B cell function [47].
Numerous studies have investigated the effects of gut microbes on piglets’ immune systems, but further surveys are required to pinpoint the precise relationships between gut immunity and the microbiota. An in-depth analysis of these mechanisms is crucial for the selection of valid interventions that will improve the intestinal health of pigs. Obviously, research targeting microorganisms will remain the main focus. Utilizing in vitro models, such as organoids, can facilitate the study of these interactions.
EFFECTS OF GUT MICROBES ON INTESTINAL HEALTH
A mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship exists between the gut flora and the host. In particular, microflora-induced signals can promote piglet health by influencing host physiology, immune response, and intestinal barrier function [48].
Piglets gut microbiota develops gradually from birth to weaning until it stabilizes. During the first 12 hours after birth, Clostridium was the dominant flora in the gut of piglets, but it was quickly replaced by Streptococcus within one day. At the ages of 5, 10 and 20 days, Lactobacillaceae with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects became the dominant flora [49,50]. Studies on the structure and changes of gut microorganisms in weaned piglets have shown a gradual increase in the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes with age, while the relative abundances of Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria gradually decreased. However, the abundance of Actinobacteria did not change significantly [51]. After the weaning process, piglets undergo a significant transition from breastfeeding to consuming more complex solid feeds. The piglets’ gut microbiome underwent a dramatic shift in composition, with a decrease of Lactobacillus spp., and a marked rise significant in Clostridium spp. and Escherichia coli (E. coli) [52]. This period of transition renders piglets vulnerable to infections caused by external pathogenic bacteria. As piglets acclimate to these dietary changes, the gut microbiota, primarily comprised of anaerobic bacteria, forms a diverse ecological community [53]. Bacteroides, as the dominating genus in the gut of piglets before weaning, assists piglets metabolize milk-derived carbohydrates because of their ability to utilize multiple saccharides [54]. Similarly, piglets can adapt to diet changes with the help of Prevotella, which can metabolize complex dietary polysaccharides, and it is also the main producer of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which regulate host energy metabolism and gut health [55]. Bacteroides and Prevotella are regarded as crucial factors in maintaining gut health in weaned piglets. While there are numerous other microbiota that are also beneficial to piglet gut health, deeper research is essential to fully elucidate the vast potential of gut microorganisms.
EFFECTS OF GUT MICROBES METABOLITES ON INTESTINAL HEALTH
Metabolites produced by microorganisms are important intermediate products of the interactions between hosts and microorganisms, which can prevent inflammation, modulate intestinal immunity and maintain intestinal barrier integrity [56,57]. The physiological activity of the body is regulated by gut microbes and their metabolites, which positively or negatively affect host health through a variety of associated signaling pathways (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Microbiome-derived metabolites and their effects on gut health. The gut microbiota will produce various metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), amino acid metabolites (polyamines, indoles, and branched-chain fatty acid [BCFAs]), and vitamins. Intestinal immune function, metabolism, and homeostasis are all regulated by these metabolites.
Indole metabolites
Indole and its derivatives are primarily synthesized through microbial fermentation of Trp. Within the intestinal barrier system, signaling through the AHR pathway is recognized as a pivotal regulator of immune responses. It has been discovered that indole and its derivatives activate the AHR in IEC, thus improving the mucosal barrier of the intestine and increasing the generation of tight junction proteins [3], and reduce inflammation via activation of the pregnane X receptor [58]. Lactobacillus and Clostridium in gut are associated with Trp metabolism, and Lactobacillus is particularly abundant in the intestinal of the Min pigs, which is known for its resistance to disease, and this is the key reason for the indole derivatives’ high levels in the intestinal of the Min pigs [59]. Indole propionic acid (IPA) is an indole metabolite produced by intestinal commensal microbiota through deamination, which can increase the production of tight junction proteins, thus improving intestinal barrier function. It also serves on certain tissues via blood circulation to maintain systemic homeostasis [60]. The intestinal barrier’s function is intricately connected to immunological activation. In LPS-stimulated Caco-2 or HT29 cells, IPA treatment significantly inhibited activation of the PI3K/AKT/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway and downregulated inflammatory cytokine expression [61]. Additionally, IPA also significantly decreased the elevated expression of interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-1β induced by dextran sulfate sodium in mice and alleviated intestinal inflammation by activating AHR [62]. Indole-3-carboxaldehyde, a derivative of indole from bacterial catabolism of metabolised Trp, regulates intestinal homeostasis by accelerating intestinal epithelial proliferation without affecting intestinal morphology and permeability [63]. When the intestinal epithelium is damaged and inflammation occurs in piglets, the increase of Trp metabolite indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in the colon contents will alleviate intestinal injury [64]. In weaned piglets, increased levels of indole and IAA produced by the colon microbiome correlated with an increase in AHR and tight junction proteins [65]. These evidences show that indole derivatives have the potential to regulate intestinal health. Indole, as a new signal molecule, plays an important role in safeguarding the stability of the intestinal environment. In-depth study on the generation and mechanism of indole derivatives will enable us to find effective strategies to enhance intestinal health.
Short-chain fatty acids
Through microbial fermentation of complex carbohydrates in the colon, SCFAs are synthesized as essential energy substrates for IEC. Butyrate, acetate, and propionate - the primary SCFAs - modulate host immune responses via PRRs expressed in IEC and are characterized by anti-inflammatory properties (Figure 3) [66].
Figure 3.
Microbiome-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) metabolites and their effects on intestinal epithelial cell (IEC). SCFAs produced by the gut microbiota (mainly Blautia, Eubacterium, Dorea, Butyricicoccus, and Lachnospiraceae, etc.) can provide energy for the replication and metabolism of IEC and can regulate the function of intestinal barrier by affecting the generation of tight junction proteins in IEC. Moreover, SCFAs promote the release of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) by Paneth cells and maintain gut health.
Colon cells metabolize SCFAs to produce adenosine triphosphate through β-oxidation and citric acid cycle. Butyrate, in particular, is the preferred energy source [67]. Besides providing energy, butyrate can also regulate intestinal immunity and barrier by triggering adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). In addition, butyrate can exert antimicrobial effects by modifying the metabolism of macrophages and upregulating the expression of AMPs through inhibiting the activity of histone deacetylase 3 [68]. In piglets, the modulatory role of butyrate in balancing apoptosis and proliferation, as well as stimulating intestinal development, has been demonstrated [69]. Intestinal flora-derived SCFAs can provide energy for pregnant sows [70], regulate the host energy homeostasis through G protein-coupled receptors (GPR)41 and GPR43 in intestine, nervous system and embryo, and exert anti-inflammatory effects [71], which ultimately benefit sows and piglets. Of course, the intestine’s anaerobic environment contributes to the synthesis of SCFAs as well. The anaerobic environment of intestine can enrich obligate anaerobic bacteria, such as Lachnospiraceae NK4A136, which may generate a significant amount of SCFAs [72]. Similarly, SCFAs can switch colon cells’ energy metabolism to β-oxidation through PPAR-γ signal [73], so as to maintain the anoxic environment and form a virtuous circle. SCFAs mediate inflammatory processes by interacting with related receptors, and mucosal immunity and SCFAs interact in a complex manner, which should be further studied.
More and more studies show that the gut microbiota and its metabolites have vital effects on physiology and immune function of the host. Targeted manipulation of the gut microbiota and its metabolites is expected to enhance piglet health, although the full extent of their impact remains incompletely understood. Studies conducted both in vivo and in vitro have offered valuable insights into the overall effects of gut flora and metabolites on piglet growth and health. Additionally, the use of omics technology can enhance our understanding of these complex interactions.
MEASURES TO REGULATE PIGLETS HEALTH
Probiotics
In the pig industry, probiotics have been widely utilized to regulate the immune system, optimize gut ecology, and promote health due to their potential to compete with pathogens for sites of adhesion and modulate host immune responses [74,75].
Oxidative stress in the intestine often leads to intestinal inflammation as well as barrier damage, accompanied by microbiota disruption, severely limiting the pig industry. Due to their antioxidant properties, various strains of lactic acid bacteria have been extensively used in pig farming. For weaned piglets, lactic acid bacteria supplementation increases the relative abundances of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, decreases the relative abundance of E. coli, and increases the SCFAs content in the intestinal [76,77]. Besides these functions, probiotics can promote the healthy growth of the host by regulating the immune system and intestinal symbiotic bacteria. For instance, probiotics can increase the production of sIgA, stimulate the secretion of intestinal mucin and AMPs, and promote the proliferation and differentiation of intestinal immune cells [78]. For weaned piglets, Bifidobacterium has the function of improving intestinal health and immunity. Supplementation of Bifidobacterium AH1206 resulted in a dose-dependent linear rise in IL-10 expression. Th2 and T-regulatory type 1 cells produce IL-10, which is necessary for antibody production and immune tolerance [79]. Providing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis to weaned piglets is helpful to reduce piglet diarrhea, and raise the relative abundances of beneficial bacteria (Streptococcus, Coprococcus, and Oscillibacter) in the gut [80]. Lactobacillus salivarius can regulate piglet immunological responses by regulating cytokines. It can also stimulate the production of antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase 4, and catalase through the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway [81]. In addition, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus casei have also been shown to be effective in relieving piglets diarrhea [82].
The observed enhancement in growth performance of piglets administered probiotics can be ascribed to the positive impacts of probiotics on gut health, including reduction of pathogen colonisation in the gut, regulation symbiotic bacteria, enhancement of gut barrier function and stimulation of the mucosal immune system. However, it is crucial to underscore that the dosage, type, mixing ratios, and duration of treatment of probiotic preparations remain to be determined. In addition, there is a need to address the potential risk of probiotic strains introducing resistance genes into the microbial ecosystem.
Amino acids
Dietary proteins and amino acids (AAs) are key substrates for intestinal microbial fermentation in pigs. Furthermore, AAs can be employed as nitrogen sources to facilitate the proliferation of intestinal microflora [83]. In the distal intestine, AAs usually have three possible metabolic pathways: (i) excreted with feces; (ii) utilized for the synthesis of protein by gut microorganisms; (iii) metabolized into other substances by gut microorganisms. Gut microbiota is the link between dietary AAs and host immunity. Microbial community composition is determined by dietary AAs, which consequently regulates the metabolism of AAs, with both directly or indirectly affecting the host’s immunity [84].
For instance, dietary L-Asparagine (ASN) is a nonessential AA that can reduce LPS-induced intestinal dysfunction in piglets through the regulation of the corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF)/CRF receptor signaling pathway. Moreover, ASN supplementation raised the amount of IEL while reversing the inflammatory response induced by LPS stress [85]. According to existing studies, AAs affect gut microbes in various ways. Dietary AAs promote the production of β-defensins and other AMPs (endogenous cationic peptides) in the gut, thus suppressing harmful microorganisms growth [86]. Along with AAs, the health of the gut has also been associated with metabolites of AAs. Trp is an essential aromatic AA that the body cannot synthesise. Most of the dietary Trp absorbed by the body is participating in the synthesis of proteins, and the rest of the Trp produces indole, indole derivatives, kynurenic acid, 5-HT and other active substances through various metabolic pathways [87]. Trp can decrease intestinal inflammation induced by Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) K88 through the calcium-sensing receptors (CaSR)/Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1/Phospholipase C γ 1 signaling pathway [88]. Insufficient Trp in the diet reduces the absorption and utilisation of protein in pigs, leading to low immunity and increased susceptibility to disease. Dietary Trp supplementation may promote intestinal health by improving antioxidant status, alleviating inflammation in the piglets’ gut after LPS attack, and inhibiting genes involved in cellular focal death [89]. To yet, the effect of dietary Trp on focal death has not been well studied, and its precise mechanisms must be examined further. Within the intestinal microenvironment, host defence mechanisms mediated by AMPs play a pivotal role in pathogen exclusion and maintenance of mucosal ecological equilibrium. Through CaSR-Trp metabolism, Trp can promote the generation of PBD1 and PBD2 while activating the CaSR-AMPK pathway to reduce intestinal inflammation [90]. The immune system has long been a therapeutic target for inflammatory or infectious diseases, and it is feasible to modulate intestinal immunity through dietary Trp supplementation to promote gut health in piglets. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a neurotransmitter, also plays an important function in the immune system. A diet supplemented with GABA may ameliorate weaning stress effects on piglets by regulating their endocrine functions [91]. In ETEC-induced intestinal inflammation in piglets, GABA derived from the gut microflora can also increase the expression of IL-17 by activating the signal transduction of mTOR complex 1-ribosomal S6 kinase 1 [92]. Adding GABA can significantly reduce the damage caused by ETEC. Additionally, it can improve intestinal mucosal immunity by promoting the secretion of sIgA in the jejunum. This effect may be connected to T cell-dependent pathways and changes in the structure and metabolic in the gut microbiota [93].
More and more researches suggest that AAs serve not only as constituents of muscle protein, but also as functional substances. Due to their various roles in energy, functional molecular precursors, signaling molecules and microbiota modulators, AAs have the potential to strengthen gut health in monogastric animals by protecting the intestinal barrier integrity, adjusting the balance of microbiota, and bolstering immunity. Further investigation is necessary to optimize the utilization of AAs’ functions while minimizing the required supplement dosage of AAs.
Faecal microbiota transplantation
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) involves the transplantation of faecal suspensions from a healthy donor to a recipient as a therapeutic intervention for various medical conditions, such as intestinal immunodeficiency, intestinal allergies, metabolic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, and Clostridium difficile infections. Additionally, FMT has garnered attention in the pig industry for its potential benefits [94,95]. After weaning, the variety of the microbiota in the gut decreases, increasing vulnerability to post-weaning diarrhea and intestinal infection [96]. As a special treatment method, FMT can regulate the intestinal health of piglets by rebuilding intestinal microecology.
Jinhua pigs, a renowned indigenous pig breed in China, exhibit heightened resistance to E. coli infection. The transplantation of the Jinhua pig faeces suspension into Duroc× Landrace×Yorkshire piglets contributed to an increase in Prevotellaceae, Firmicutes, Ruminococcus, and other microorganisms in the recipient piglets’ colons, as well as a reduction in diarrhea. In addition, the morphology and integrity of the gut were improved with a rise in goblet cells, MUC2 protein and immune-related receptors [97]. As a critical member of the IL-10 cytokine family, IL-22 is predominantly produced by ILC3 and mediates intestinal barrier immunity and systemic immunological regulation [98]. Trp metabolism in recipient piglets produces indole derivatives, which can help preserve intestinal integrity by generating IL-22 that is dependent on the AHR [64]. Piglets of the Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire breed infected with E. coli K88 were given a transplant with the faecal microbial suspension of Jinhua pigs. Study outcomes demonstrated that FMT reduced LPS-induced intestinal inflammation and modulated the Trp metabolic function of the microbial communities in recipient piglets’ colons. The number of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Succinivibrio increased in infected piglets after FMT, while the number of Enterobacteriaceae and Proteobacteria decreased. Additionally, the intestinal permeability of recipient piglets was decreased, and the expression of mucins and tight junction proteins in the intestinal tract were enhanced, which is conducive to reducing piglets’ diarrhea. The intervention of exogenous faecal microbiota increased Forkhead box O-mediated protective autophagy in the recipient intestinal mucosa, alleviating IEC damage [99]. It was shown that FMT can protect the integrity of the intestinal barrier by triggering mucosal protective autophagy. Tibetan pigs, which have excellent disease resistance, have become a popular option for donors. Oral administration of faecal microbiota from healthy Tibetan pigs resulted in significant reductions in diarrhea rates and tissue damage scores in recipient piglets. In addition, FMT treated markedly an increase in colon length, improved the microbial flora, and could regulate the immune function of the recipient piglets. Moreover, FMT treatment could reduce piglets’ diarrhea, downregulate the TLR signaling pathway and inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression, and improve the integrity of the intestinal via controlling the composition of the intestinal microbiota [100].
These results suggest that FMT can remodel the pig gut microbiota. However, the precise mechanism and optimal scheme have not been thoroughly studied, and there is considerable uncertainty. Using FMT as a strategy to enhance pig health, increase feed efficiency, or prevent or treat illnesses is still in the beginning stages. Due to the scarcity of data, it is difficult to conclude definitively on the effectiveness of FMT in piglets. There are obvious biological safety problems in FMT, and it is difficult to screen all possible harmful microorganisms in donors with current technology. In addition, FMT still faces many challenges, such as obtaining high-quality samples, reducing the risk of infection and disease transmission, and ensuring the stability and long-term effect of FMT. Especially in the field of intensive pig production, a product with low cost and high quality is needed. However, considering that there have been many successful cases of FMT in human beings, it is believed that remarkable achievements can be made in the pig industry.
CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES
The weaning of piglets is a critical step in their growth and development. The gut microbiome and immune system of piglets are immature at this stage, and piglets are sensitive to sickness and have poor defences against outside influences. Intestinal immunity, as a line of immune system defence, is very important for the control and avoidance of diseases. The gut microbes are indispensable to the development of the intestinal mucosal immune system, many of which can also have an influence on the differentiation of immune cells. Although research on host immune-microbiota interactions is continuously evolving and the precise mechanisms still require further investigation, it is evident that gut microorganisms and their metabolites possess significant potential to regulate host health. These studies will help provide effective strategies for managing and restoring gut homeostasis to improve productivity, reduce stress, prevent disease, and promote healthy development of the pig industry in the future.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
Conceptualization: Xu K.
Investigation: Hou X.
Writing - original draft: Hou X.
Writing - review & editing: Hou X, Chen Y, Chen F, Yin Y, Xu K.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32372913), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province Project (2023JJ20043), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2023RC3204), the Yunnan Science and Technology Talent and Platform Program (202505AT350004) and the Hunan Province Major Basic Research Project (2024JC0007).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
All the figures were created by Figdraw and BioRender.com (used with permission).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Not applicable.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.
ETHICS APPROVAL
Not applicable.
DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI
No AI tools were used in this article.
REFERENCES
- 1.de Vos WM, Tilg H, Van Hul M, Cani PD. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut. 2022;71:1020–32. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kedmi R, Najar TA, Mesa KR, et al. A RORγt+ cell instructs gut microbiota-specific Treg cell differentiation. Nature. 2022;610:737–43. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05089-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen Y, Wang Y, Fu Y, Yin Y, Xu K. Modulating AHR function offers exciting therapeutic potential in gut immunity and inflammation. Cell Biosci. 2023;13:85. doi: 10.1186/s13578-023-01046-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malo MS, Alam SN, Mostafa G, et al. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase preserves the normal homeostasis of gut microbiota. Gut. 2010;59:1476–84. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.211706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arnal ME, Zhang J, Messori S, Bosi P, Smidt H, Lallès JP. Early changes in microbial colonization selectively modulate intestinal enzymes, but not inducible heat shock proteins in young adult swine. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e87967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vega-López MA, Bailey M, Telemo E, Stokes CR. Effect of early weaning on the development of immune cells in the pig small intestine. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1995;44:319–27. doi: 10.1016/0165-2427(94)05309-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wiarda JE, Trachsel JM, Bond ZF, Byrne KA, Gabler NK, Loving CL. Intraepithelial T cells diverge by intestinal location as pigs age. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1139. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moeser AJ, Pohl CS, Rajput M. Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2017;3:313–21. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Neish AS. Mucosal immunity and the microbiome. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:S28–32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-161MG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peterson LW, Artis D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:141–53. doi: 10.1038/nri3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mookherjee N, Hancock REW. Cationic host defence peptides: innate immune regulatory peptides as a novel approach for treating infections. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:922. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6475-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Su G, Luo Y, Chen D, Yu B, He J. NF-κB-dependent induction of porcine β-defensin 114 regulates intestinal epithelium homeostasis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;192:241–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bao Q, Li C, Xu C, Zhang R, Zhao K, Duan Z. Porcine enterocyte protein Btnl5 negatively regulates NF-kappa B pathway by interfering p65 nuclear translocation. Gene. 2018;646:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Olivares-Villagómez D, Van Kaer L. Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes: sentinels of the mucosal barrier. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:264–75. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Y, Ma Y, Jin Y, et al. Porcine intraepithelial lymphocytes undergo migration and produce an antiviral response following intestinal virus infection. Commun Biol. 2022;5:252. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03205-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lavelle EC, Ward RW. Mucosal vaccines: fortifying the frontiers. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:236–50. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00583-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang X, Peng H, Tian Z. Innate lymphoid cell memory. Cell Mol Immunol. 2019;16:423–9. doi: 10.1038/s41423-019-0212-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Diefenbach A, Colonna M, Koyasu S. Development, differentiation, and diversity of innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. 2014;41:354–65. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu W, Domingues RG, Fonseca-Pereira D, et al. NFIL3 orchestrates the emergence of common helper innate lymphoid cell precursors. Cell Rep. 2015;10:2043–54. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wiarda JE, Trachsel JM, Sivasankaran SK, Tuggle CK, Loving CL. Intestinal single-cell atlas reveals novel lymphocytes in pigs with similarities to human cells. Life Sci Alliance. 2022;5:e202201442. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schwarz E, Saalmüller A, Gerner W, Claus R. Intraepithelial but not lamina propria lymphocytes in the porcine gut are affected by dexamethasone treatment. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005;105:125–39. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gāliņa D, Ansonska L, Valdovska A. Effect of probiotics and herbal products on intestinal histomorphological and immunological development in piglets. Vet Med Int. 2020;2020:3461768. doi: 10.1155/2020/3461768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kalita A, Talukdar M, Sarma K, et al. Lymphocyte subsets in the small intestine of piglets fed with probiotic and zinc: a qualitative and quantitative micro-anatomical study. Folia Morphol. 2022;81:82–90. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jung C, Hugot JP, Barreau F. Peyer’s patches: the immune sensors of the intestine. Int J Inflamm. 2010;2010:823710. doi: 10.4061/2010/823710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barman NN, Bianchi ATJ, Zwart RJ, Pabst R, Rothkötter HJ. Jejunal and ileal Peyer’s patches in pigs differ in their postnatal development. Anat Embryol. 1996;195:41–50. doi: 10.1007/s004290050023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Butler JE, Santiago-Mateo K, Wertz N, Sun X, Sinkora M, Francis DL. Antibody repertoire development in fetal and neonatal piglets. XXIV. Hypothesis: the ileal Peyer patches (IPP) are the major source of primary, undiversified IgA antibodies in newborn piglets. Dev Comp Immunol. 2016;65:340–51. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2016.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Levast B, De Monte M, Melo S, et al. Differences in transcriptomic profile and IgA repertoire between jejunal and ileal Peyer’s patches. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34:102–6. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Furukawa M, Ito S, Suzuki S, et al. Organogenesis of ileal Peyer’s patches is initiated prenatally and accelerated postnatally with comprehensive proliferation of B cells in pigs. Front Immunol. 2020;11:604674. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.604674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu G, Wang B, Chen Q, et al. Interleukin (IL)-21 promotes the differentiation of IgA-producing plasma cells in porcine Peyer’s patches via the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1303. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Herath M, Hosie S, Bornstein JC, Franks AE, Hill-Yardin EL. The role of the gastrointestinal mucus system in intestinal homeostasis: implications for neurological disorders. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:248. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hansson GC. Mucins and the microbiome. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89:769–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-011520-105053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bergstrom K, Fu J, Johansson MEV, et al. Core 1– and 3–derived O-glycans collectively maintain the colonic mucus barrier and protect against spontaneous colitis in mice. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10:91–103. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Johansson MEV, Phillipson M, Petersson J, Velcich A, Holm L, Hansson GC. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:15064–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803124105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xia B, Zhong R, Wu W, et al. Mucin O-glycan-microbiota axis orchestrates gut homeostasis in a diarrheal pig model. Microbiome. 2022;10:139. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01326-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li Y, Wang X, Zhang E, et al. Calpain-1: a novel antiviral host factor identified in porcine small intestinal mucus. mBio. 2022;13:e00358–22. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00358-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aderem A, Ulevitch RJ. Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune response. Nature. 2000;406:782–7. doi: 10.1038/35021228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mu C, Yang Y, Zhu W. Crosstalk between the immune receptors and gut microbiota. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2015;16:622–31. doi: 10.2174/1389203716666150630134356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Arnaud AP, Rome V, Richard M, Formal M, David-Le Gall S, Boudry G. Post-natal co-development of the microbiota and gut barrier function follows different paths in the small and large intestine in piglets. FASEB J. 2020;34:1430–46. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902514R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lerch F, Yosi F, Vötterl JC, et al. An insight into the temporal dynamics in the gut microbiome, metabolite signaling, immune response, and barrier function in suckling and weaned piglets under production conditions. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1184277. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1184277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Beaumont M, Lencina C, Fève K, et al. Disruption of the primocolonizing microbiota alters epithelial homeostasis and imprints stem cells in the colon of neonatal piglets. FASEB J. 2023;37:e23149. doi: 10.1096/fj.202301182R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vötterl JC, Lerch F, Schwartz-Zimmermann HE, et al. Plant-oriented microbiome inoculum modulates age-related maturation of gut-mucosal expression of innate immune and barrier function genes in suckling and weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. 2023;101:skad165. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cerutti A, Rescigno M. The biology of intestinal immunoglobulin A responses. Immunity. 2008;28:740–50. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Macpherson AJ, Harris NL. Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:478–85. doi: 10.1038/nri1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang Y, Liu L, Moore DJ, et al. An LGG-derived protein promotes IgA production through upregulation of APRIL expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10:373–84. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jin YB, Cao X, Shi CW, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG promotes early B lineage development and IgA production in the lamina propria in piglets. J Immunol. 2021;207:2179–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tang W, Wei Y, Ni Z, Hou K, Luo XM, Wang H. IgA-mediated control of host-microbial interaction during weaning reaction influences gut inflammation. Gut Microbes. 2024;16:2323220. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2323220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang J, Shen Y, Yang G, et al. Commensal microbiota modulates phenotypic characteristics and gene expression in piglet Peyer’s patches. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1084332. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1084332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jang KB, Purvis JM, Kim SW. Supplemental effects of dietary lysophospholipids in lactation diets on sow performance, milk composition, gut health, and gut-associated microbiome of offspring. J Anim Sci. 2020;98:skaa227. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Petri D, Hill JE, Van Kessel AG. Microbial succession in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of the preweaned pig. Livest Sci. 2010;133:107–9. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yu J, Zuo B, Li Q, et al. Dietary supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P-8 improves the growth per-formance and gut microbiota of weaned piglets. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e02345–22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02345-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen L, Xu Y, Chen X, Fang C, Zhao L, Chen F. The maturing development of gut microbiota in commercial piglets during the weaning transition. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1688. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gresse R, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fleury MA, de Wiele TV, Forano E, Blanquet-Diot S. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: understanding the keys to health. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:851–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim HB, Isaacson RE. The pig gut microbial diversity: understanding the pig gut microbial ecology through the next generation high throughput sequencing. Vet Microbiol. 2015;177:242–51. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Guevarra RB, Hong SH, Cho JH, et al. The dynamics of the piglet gut microbiome during the weaning transition in association with health and nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9:54. doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0269-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Luo Y, Ren W, Smidt H, et al. Dynamic distribution of gut microbiota in pigs at different growth stages: composition and contribution. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:e00688–21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00688-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhou X, Liu Y, Xiong X, et al. Intestinal accumulation of microbiota-produced succinate caused by loss of microRNAs leads to diarrhea in weanling piglets. Gut Microbes. 2022;14:2091369. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2091369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ma Y, Han X, Fang J, Jiang H. Role of dietary amino acids and microbial metabolites in the regulation of pig intestinal health. Anim Nutr. 2022;9:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Venkatesh M, Mukherjee S, Wang H, et al. Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and toll-like receptor 4. Immunity. 2014;41:296–310. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhao X, Jiang L, Fang X, et al. Host-microbiota interaction-mediated resistance to inflammatory bowel disease in pigs. Microbiome. 2022;10:115. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01303-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jiang H, Chen C, Gao J. Extensive summary of the important roles of indole propionic acid, a gut microbial metabolite in host health and disease. Nutrients. 2022;15:151. doi: 10.3390/nu15010151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li J, Zhang L, Wu T, Li Y, Zhou X, Ruan Z. Indole-3-propionic acid improved the intestinal barrier by enhancing epithelial barrier and mucus barrier. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:1487–95. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Alexeev EE, Lanis JM, Kao DJ, et al. Microbiota-derived indole metabolites promote human and murine intestinal homeostasis through regulation of interleukin-10 receptor. Am J Pathol. 2018;188:1183–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang R, Huang G, Ren Y, et al. Effects of dietary indole-3-carboxaldehyde supplementation on growth performance, intestinal epithelial function, and intestinal microbial composition in weaned piglets. Front Nutr. 2022;9:896815. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.896815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Geng S, Cheng S, Li Y, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation reduces susceptibility to epithelial injury and modulates tryptophan metabolism of the microbial community in a piglet model. J Crohns Colitis. 2018;12:1359–74. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liang H, Dai Z, Liu N, et al. Dietary L-tryptophan modulates the structural and functional composition of the intestinal microbiome in weaned piglets. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1736. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mukherjee A, Lordan C, Ross RP, Cotter PD. Gut microbes from the phylogenetically diverse genus Eubacterium and their various contributions to gut health. Gut Microbes. 2020;12:1802866. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1802866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Deleu S, Machiels K, Raes J, Verbeke K, Vermeire S. Short chain fatty acids and its producing organisms: an overlooked therapy for IBD? eBioMedicine. 2021;66:103293. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schulthess J, Pandey S, Capitani M, et al. The short chain fatty acid butyrate imprints an antimicrobial program in macrophages. Immunity. 2019;50:432–45E7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zeng X, Yang Y, Wang J, et al. Dietary butyrate, lauric acid and stearic acid improve gut morphology and epithelial cell turnover in weaned piglets. Anim Nutr. 2022;11:276–82. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chen Z, Yang H, Fu H, et al. Gut bacterial species in late trimester of pregnant sows influence the occurrence of stillborn piglet through pro-inflammation response. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1101130. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1101130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341:569–73. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wen Y, Yang L, Wang Z, et al. Blocked conversion of Lactobacillus johnsonii derived acetate to butyrate mediates copper-induced epithelial barrier damage in a pig model. Microbiome. 2023;11:218. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01655-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Byndloss MX, Olsan EE, Rivera-Chávez F, et al. Microbiota-activated PPAR-γ signaling inhibits dysbiotic Enterobacteriaceae expansion. Science. 2017;357:570–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liu J, Ma X, Zhuo Y, et al. The effects of Bacillus subtilis QST713 and β-mannanase on growth performance, intestinal barrier function, and the gut microbiota in weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. 2023;101:skad257. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yan H, Xing Q, Xiao X, et al. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae postbiotics and essential oil on growth performance and intestinal health of weanling pigs during K88 ETEC infection. J Anim Sci. 2024;102:skae007. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wang K, Chen G, Cao G, Xu Y, Wang Y, Yang C. Effects of Clostridium butyricum and Enterococcus faecalis on growth performance, intestinal structure, and inflammation in lipopolysaccharide-challenged weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. 2019;97:4140–51. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Xin J, Zeng D, Wang H, et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 promotes growth performance, intestinal immunity, and gut microbiota in piglets. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020;12:184–93. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9511-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Su W, Gong T, Jiang Z, Lu Z, Wang Y. The role of probiotics in alleviating postweaning diarrhea in piglets from the perspective of intestinal barriers. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:883107. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.883107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Herfel TM, Jacobi SK, Lin X, et al. Dietary supplementation of Bifidobacterium longum strain AH1206 increases its cecal abundance and elevates intestinal interleukin-10 expression in the neonatal piglet. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;60:116–22. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pang J, Liu Y, Kang L, et al. Bifidobacterium animalis promotes the growth of weaning piglets by improving intestinal development, enhancing antioxidant capacity, and modulating gut microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88:e01296–22. doi: 10.1128/aem.01296-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sun Z, Li H, Li Y, Qiao J. Lactobacillus salivarius, a potential probiotic to improve the health of LPS-challenged piglet intestine by alleviating inflammation as well as oxidative stress in a dose-dependent manner during weaning transition. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:547425. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Li Q, Zheng T, Ding H, et al. Exploring the benefits of probiotics in gut inflammation and diarrhea—from an antioxidant perspective. Antioxidants. 2023;12:1342. doi: 10.3390/antiox12071342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wu J, Ma N, Johnston LJ, Ma X. Dietary nutrients mediate intestinal host defense peptide expression. Adv Nutr. 2020;11:92–102. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ren W, Rajendran R, Zhao Y, et al. Amino acids as mediators of metabolic cross talk between host and pathogen. Front Immunol. 2018;9:319. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhu H, Pi D, Leng W, et al. Asparagine preserves intestinal barrier function from LPS-induced injury and regulates CRF/CRFR signaling pathway. Innate Immun. 2017;23:546–56. doi: 10.1177/1753425917721631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Szabó C, Kachungwa Lugata J, Ortega ADSV. Gut health and influencing factors in pigs. Animals. 2023;13:1350. doi: 10.3390/ani13081350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Nunzi E, Pariano M, Costantini C, Garaci E, Puccetti P, Romani L. Host–microbe serotonin metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2025;36:83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2024.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Liu G, Gu K, Wang F, et al. Tryptophan ameliorates barrier integrity and alleviates the inflammatory response to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 through the CaSR/Rac1/PLC-γ1 signaling pathway in porcine intestinal epithelial cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12:748497. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.748497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Liu G, Tao J, Lu J, et al. Dietary tryptophan supplementation improves antioxidant status and alleviates inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, apoptosis, and pyroptosis in the intestine of piglets after lipopolysaccharide challenge. Antioxidants. 2022;11:872. doi: 10.3390/antiox11050872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gao N, Dou X, Yin T, et al. Tryptophan promotes intestinal immune defense through calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR)-dependent metabolic pathways. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:13460–73. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Li YH, Li F, Liu M, et al. Effect of γ-aminobutyric acid on growth performance, behavior and plasma hormones in weaned pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 2015;95:165–71. doi: 10.4141/CJAS2013-148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ren W, Yin J, Xiao H, et al. Intestinal microbiota-derived GABA mediates interleukin-17 expression during enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection. Front Immunol. 2016;7:685. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhao Y, Wang J, Wang H, et al. Effects of GABA supplementation on intestinal SIgA secretion and gut microbiota in the healthy and ETEC-infected weanling piglets. Med Inflamm. 2020;2020:7368483. doi: 10.1155/2020/7368483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Li N, Zuo B, Huang S, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of bacterial colonization across different gut segments following inter-species microbiota transplantation. Microbiome. 2020;8:161. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00917-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lopez J, Grinspan A. Fecal microbiota transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;12:374–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Fouhse JM, Zijlstra RT, Willing BP. The role of gut microbiota in the health and disease of pigs. Anim Front. 2016;6:30–6. doi: 10.2527/af.2016-0031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Canibe N, O’Dea M, Abraham S. Potential relevance of pig gut content transplantation for production and research. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10:55. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0363-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Melo-Gonzalez F, Hepworth MR. Functional and phenotypic heterogeneity of group 3 innate lymphoid cells. Immunology. 2017;150:265–75. doi: 10.1111/imm.12697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cheng S, Ma X, Geng S, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation beneficially regulates intestinal mucosal auto-phagy and alleviates gut barrier injury. mSystems. 2018;3:e00137–18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00137-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tang W, Chen D, Yu B, et al. Capsulized faecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates post-weaning diarrhoea by modulating the gut microbiota in piglets. Vet Res. 2020;51:55. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00779-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



