Skip to main content
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow logoLink to Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
editorial
. 2025 Sep 1;28(3):263–265. doi: 10.5397/cise.2025.00843

Critical role of the acromioclavicular ligament in posterior stability: a paradigm shift in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction

Kyu-Hak Jung 1,
PMCID: PMC12415468  PMID: 41287427

For decades, surgical treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations has predominantly focused on coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction, following principles established by Weaver and Dunn in 1972 [1]. However, mounting clinical evidence of persistent instability following isolated CC reconstruction has challenged this paradigm. Hattori et al. [2] featured in this issue, provide compelling biomechanical evidence that fundamentally changes the perspective on AC joint stability. This noteworthy cadaveric investigation is the first to evaluate both superior and posterior stability using fresh-frozen specimens with preserved soft tissue architecture around the entire shoulder girdle.

Previous biomechanical studies by Dawson et al. [3] and Dyrna et al. [4] utilized dissected specimens with removed muscle and soft tissue components, potentially altering the natural biomechanical environment. The importance of the study of Hattori et al. [2] is in preserving the entire thoracic region, scapula, clavicle, and shoulder components, including deltoid and upper trapezius muscle origins and insertions. This methodological rigor, particularly the preservation of surrounding soft tissue architecture, directly addresses limitations and inconsistencies highlighted in previous systematic reviews of AC joint biomechanics research [5]. The largest contribution of Hattori et al. [2] is demonstrating the essential function of AC ligaments in posterior stability through quantitative measurement, demonstrating progressive increases in translation of 0.0 mm in intact specimens, 3.2 mm after isolated AC ligament resection, and 9.0 mm following combined AC+CC ligament resection. This is evidence that AC ligaments are essential stability components.

For superior stability, the minimal translation with isolated AC ligament resection (1.1 mm) versus dramatic increase following combined resection (9.6 mm) confirms the primary role of CC ligaments while highlighting the synergistic effect of the two ligament systems. These findings provide a scientific foundation for concerning clinical observations. Scheibel et al. [6] reported radiographic posterior instability in 42.9% of patients following CC ligament reconstruction alone, with significantly inferior cl inical outcomes. Hattori et al. [2] explains why CC ligament reconstruction alone may be insufficient.

Further supporting these findings, Nakazawa et al. [7] demonstrate that AC ligaments run obliquely at 30° to the joint surface, optimally positioning them to resist posterior translation, as revealed by Hattori et al. [2]. This anatomical insight aligns with recent biomechanical investigations. Morikawa et al. [8] demonstrated that AC ligament complex transection reduced resistance to posterior translation to less than 25% compared to native ligaments. Saier et al. [9] showed that isolated CC reconstruction did not provide adequate horizontal stability compared to combined AC and CC reconstruction. Beitzel et al. [10] found that AC ligament reconstruction by direct wrapping around the AC joint was most stable, emphasizing the importance of AC ligaments in anatomic reconstruction, as validated by Hattori et al. [2].

Despite compelling biomechanical evidence, clinical translation remains challenging. The systematic review by Jordan et al. [11] revealed that, while biomechanical studies consistently show enhanced posterior stability with combined AC-CC reconstruction, comparative clinical studies found no significant differences in functional outcomes. This paradox highlights the complexity of translating laboratory findings to patient outcomes and may be attributed to the multifactorial nature of shoulder function, limitations of current outcome measures, or methodological variations in study designs. Recent systematic reviews found clinical evidence of improved outcomes with AC joint repair and reconstruction, although comparison between studies was difficult due to methodological variations [12].

Recognition of horizontal instability has led to development of more than 150 AC joint repair or reconstruction techniques [13]. Current concepts emphasize that 80% of horizontal stability is provided by an intact superior-posterior capsuloligamentous complex [14]. Recent finite element modeling shows that different ligament bundles play substantial roles during various shoulder motions [15]. These advances support the comprehensive reconstruction approach validated by Hattori et al. [2]. Emerging techniques such as combined AC-CC reconstruction methods using dermal allografts and modern suture anchor constructs represent the type of comprehensive approaches that are expected to benefit most from this new understanding of AC ligament biomechanics [8,16]. These methods specifically address both vertical and horizontal stability components identified by Hattori et al. [2].

The study of Hattori et al. [2] represents a watershed moment in the understanding of AC joint biomechanics. By demonstrating AC ligaments' essential function in posterior stability through methodologically rigorous testing with preserved soft tissue architecture, the study provides scientific justification for comprehensive reconstruction approaches. While clinical studies have not yet demonstrated clear superiority of combined reconstruction approaches, the biomechanical advantages clearly demonstrated by Hattori et al. [2] are robustly supported.

This paradigm shift toward comprehensive AC joint reconstruction acknowledges that successful treatment must address the multidirectional nature of AC joint instability. The findings suggest that future surgical approaches should systematically evaluate and address both CC ligament-mediated vertical stability and AC ligament-mediated horizontal stability to optimize clinical outcomes. The era of isolated CC ligament reconstruction as standard care may be replaced by comprehensive strategies acknowledging the importance of AC ligaments to joint stability. This study provides crucial biomechanical foundation for that evolution.

Footnotes

Author contributions

All the work was done by Kyu-Hak Jung.

Conflict of interest

Kyu-Hak Jung is an editorial board member of the journal but was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Funding

None.

Data availability

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Weaver JK, Dunn HK. Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54:1187–94. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197254060-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hattori F, Ochiai N, Hashimoto E, et al. Effects of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament stability on acromioclavicular joint dislocation: insights from a cadaveric study. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025;28:276–82. doi: 10.5397/cise.2025.00157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dawson PA, Adamson GJ, Pink MM, et al. Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:237–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dyrna F, Imhoff FB, Haller B, et al. Primary stability of an acromioclavicular joint repair is affected by the type of additional reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:3471–9. doi: 10.1177/0363546518807908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fraipont GM, Beyer RS, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. Acromioclavicular joint biomechanics: a systematic review. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024;4:668–75. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scheibel M, Dröschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1507–16. doi: 10.1177/0363546511399379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nakazawa M, Nimura A, Mochizuki T, et al. The orientation and variation of the acromioclavicular ligament: an anatomic study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2690–5. doi: 10.1177/0363546516651440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morikawa D, Mazzocca AD, Obopilwe E, et al. Reconstruction of the acromioclavicular ligament complex using dermal allograft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:108–15. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saier T, Venjakob AJ, Minzlaff P, et al. Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1498–505. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2895-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos J, et al. Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2141–8. doi: 10.1177/0363546514538947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jordan RW, Malik S, Bentick K, Saithna A. Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:3747–63. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khoriati AA, Antonios T, Fozo ZA, et al. Is there a role for acromioclavicular (AC) joint capsular repair and reconstruction in high-grade AC separations? A systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2025;10:115–24. doi: 10.1530/eor-2023-0121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Berthold DP, Muench LN, Dyrna F, et al. Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability: a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:1078. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klimkiewicz JJ, Williams GR, Sher JS, et al. The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: a biomechanical analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:119–24. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Velasquez Garcia A, Salamé Castillo F, Ekdahl Giordani M, Mura Mardones J. Anteroinferior bundle of the acromioclavicular ligament plays a substantial role in the joint function during shoulder elevation and horizontal adduction: a finite element model. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:73. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02966-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.White CC, Cincere BA. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with acromioclavicular ligament augmentation using a knotless, all-suture anchor construct. Arthrosc Tech. 2025;14:103226. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow are provided here courtesy of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society

RESOURCES