Skip to main content
Animal Bioscience logoLink to Animal Bioscience
. 2025 Apr 11;38(9):1921–1933. doi: 10.5713/ab.24.0872

Rapid determination of nutrient composition and mineral element content of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) using near-infrared spectroscopy

Tao Wang 1, Li Wang 1, Tao Guo 1, Yanli Shi 1, Baocang Liu 2, Fei Li 1,*
PMCID: PMC12415469  PMID: 40241587

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to establish an accurate and reliable near-infrared spectroscopy to enable rapid, efficient, and non-destructive evaluation of the nutritional quality of common vetches across different regions and varieties.

Methods

A total of 190 samples from various regions and varieties were selected for this study, which were divided into a calibration set (4:1 ratio) and validation set. The original spectrum of the calibration set is subjected to 10 different pretreatment techniques in combination with first and second derivatives, while the prediction model was established by combining the measured value of common vetch with the modified partial least squares method.

Results

The results indicate that the calibration root-mean-square error and cross-validation root-mean-square error values range from 0.01 to 1.25 and 0.01 to 1.37, respectively. The determination coefficients of cross-validation (R2CV) for phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), and iron (Fe) are relatively low at 0.82, 0.86, 0.82, and 0.74, respectively; however, all other indicators have R2CV values above 0.90. The predicted root means square errors (RMSEP) for common vetch indexes range from 0.01 to 1.87, with RMSEP values higher than 1.0 observed for crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and ash indices, whereas RMSEP values lower than or equal to 1.0 were obtained for other indicators. The measured coefficient of determination (R2p) demonstrates that the R2p values for each nutrient element and mineral element vary from 0.70 to 0.96. The residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for Mg exhibit relatively low levels, while the RPD values for other indicators exceed 2.0.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that this study provides a viable approach to evaluate the nutritional composition and mineral element content of different varieties and regions of common vetch.

Keywords: Common Vetch, Modified Partial Least Squares Method, Near Infrared Spectroscopy, Nutritional Quality, Prediction Accuracy

INTRODUCTION

Common vetch, also known as the big nest vegetable or wilderness pea, is an annual or perennial species in the legume family and belongs to the genus Vicia [1]. Common vetch is noted for its resilience to cold, drought, and infertile soils. In northwest China, Common vetch is widely integrated into wheat fields through intercropping and multiple cropping systems to enhance protein content and pasture yield [2]. As global living standards improve, the demand for ruminant meat rises, driving the need for high-quality forage. Recent domestic and international research has demonstrated that feeding common vetch or blending it with Gramineae grasses can significantly improve the palatability and digestibility of feed, and enhance ruminants’ performance through adjusting rumen microbial communities [3]. As a result, common vetch has become a crucial source of premium forage in animal husbandry [4]. To address feed ingredient shortages, breeders and scientists have focused on developing common vetch varieties with enhanced stress tolerance, high yields, disease resistance, and nutritional richness over recent decades [5,6]. The findings of this study have facilitated the development of a diverse array of common vetch varieties in the market, which offers producers an expanded selection and allows for optimized feed production in accordance with regional demands [7].

However, the determination of nutrient content in common vetch still relies on traditional wet chemical analysis, which not only consumes a significant amount of time and resources but also imposes specific requirements on experimental equipment and operators [8]. The absence of a rapid, convenient, and cost-effective method for quality evaluation of common vetch presents challenges for producers in accurately selecting the desired varieties promptly. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an efficient, accurate, simple, and affordable method to evaluate the nutritional value of common vetch. This endeavor holds great significance in promoting the rapid development of the common vetch industry.

The near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) is not only characterized by its simplicity, speed, efficiency, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness but also eliminates the need for complex pre-treatment and chemical analysis processes. Additionally, it enables simultaneous analysis of multiple chemical indices [9]. In recent years, research has demonstrated the effective utilization of near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics for the comprehensive analysis of plant chemical composition and high-throughput phenotype [10]. However, previous studies primarily focused on selecting samples from the same variety of plants or feeds, resulting in minimal variations in various chemical indexes among these samples. This could potentially hinder the accurate prediction of nutritional indexes for different varieties within the same variety by the established model [11]. Therefore, there is still limited available literature on the utilization of NIRS models for predicting nutrient composition and mineral element content in different varieties and regions of common vetch.

In this context, the objective of this study was to develop a rapid, efficient, and non-destructive quantitative analysis model for nutrients and mineral elements in common vetch from diverse regions and varieties by integrating near-infrared spectroscopy with chemical composition analysis. We hypothesized that through extensive sampling of common vetches from various regions and varieties, a rapid, accurate, and reliable NIRS model could be established to effectively predict the nutritional quality of common vetches. This model is expected to accurately predict the nutritional quality of common vetch, thereby providing a solid theoretical foundation and advanced technical support for the selection of high-quality varieties. This will significantly advance the development of the common vetch-based forage industry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample selection and preparation

To construct an optimal near-infrared NIR model, a meticulously curated dataset of 150 samples was extracted from diverse common vetch varieties cultivated at the Yuzhong Campus of Lanzhou University (Lanzhou, China). This collection included the varieties Lanjian 1, Lanjian 2, Lanjian 3, Lanjian 6, and Lanjian 7, among others. Furthermore, to ensure the representativeness of the samples, an additional 40 samples were collected from various regions of Qinghai Province, which expanded the sample collection to a total of 190, representing a broad spectrum of ecological niches and growth conditions. This extensive sampling coverage guarantees the robustness and versatility of the NIR model.

During the mature period and heading stages of selected common vetch, samples are manually collected by cutting the plants at a height of 3 to 5 cm to ensure representative sampling. Subsequently, the stem samples are promptly transported to the laboratory for analysis and processing. In the laboratory, the stem samples are initially placed in a 65°C oven to remove excess moisture and maintain their stability. Subsequently, the common vetch stem samples were trimmed into fragments measuring 2 to 3 cm in length and pulverized using a grinder (CM100; Crinoer Technology, Beijing, China). Furthermore, as an essential step in the grinding process, it is crucial that the samples are screened with a 1 mm screen to further refine them according to specific particle size requirements. After completing these procedures, it is necessary to thoroughly blend the mixture before storing it in an air-tight bag while ensuring protection from light exposure and maintaining optimal dryness and environmental conditions for quality stability.

Determination of nutritional and elemental composition of samples

These samples were analyzed to dry matter (DM; method 930.15), crude protein (CP; method 976.05), ether extract (EE; method 2003.05), ash (method 942.05), neutral detergent-insoluble fiber (NDF; method 2002.04), and acid detergent-insoluble fiber (ADF), as described in AOAC [12]. The content of organic matter (OM) is calculated by subtracting the ash content from the DM value. The samples were subjected to two repeated measurements, and the results were presented as an average value. Furthermore, all results were standardized on a DM basis.

According to the Chinese National recommended standard (GB/T 20902-2014), the mineral element content was determined using the following procedure: Firstly, weigh 0.3 g (accurate to 0.0001 g) of the common vetch sample that has been passed through a 1mm sieve and uniformly mixed, and place it into the microwave digestion vessel. Subsequently, 8.0 mL of high-grade pure concentrated nitric acid and 1.0 mL of high-grade pure hydrogen peroxide were added, allowing to stand for 30 min to ensure thorough reaction. The digestion process was carried out using a microwave digester (JUPITER-B; Shanghai Xinyi Microwave Chemical Technology, Shanghai, China). The digestion procedure consisted of two stages: initially maintaining the temperature at 150°C for 10 min, followed by raising it to 180°C for an additional 15 min until complete dissolution of the sample was achieved. Subsequently, the digested sample was transferred to an acid separator (TK12; Shanghai Xinyi Microwave Chemical Technology) and subjected to deacidify treatment at 160°C. When the liquid volume in the microwave digestion tank reduced to approximately 1 mL, the sample was removed and allowed to cool down to room temperature. The resulting digestive solution was then transferred into a 50 mL volumetric bottle, set with deionized water to constant volume, and filtered through a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 μm. Subsequently, in accordance with the Chinese national recommended standard (GB/T 30902-2014), calibration was performed using the inorganic element mixed solution reference material (GBW (E) 081531, China National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China) and the phosphorus element reference material (GSB04-1741-2004 (b), China National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China), both provided by the Chinese Academy of Metrology Sciences. The determination was carried out using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES 725; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with a multi-color temperature set at 35°C. The plasma gas flow rate, nebulizer gas flow rate, and auxiliary gas flow rate were adjusted to 12, 1 and 1 L/min respectively. The spectral selection, standard curve, and correlation coefficient for each element are detailed in Table 1. Each sample was measured twice in parallel, and the average value was taken as the final content of the sample elements. Blank controls were also established to ensure accuracy of the results.

Table 1.

Spectral line, standard curve, and correlation coefficient of each element

Element Analytical line (nm) Standard curve equation Correlation coefficient
Ca 211.276 Y1) = 105.3169x2)+40.2397 0.99963
K 766.491 Y = 293.3144x+504.6263 0.9999
P 253.561 Y = 315.9378x+19.7925 0.99984
Mg 202.582 Y = 198.1616x+13.0559 0.99976
Fe 238.204 Y = 6,202.9591x+18.7043 0.99975
1)

Y, spectral absorption intensity.

2)

x, elemental concentration.

Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy spectral data acquisition and pretreatments

A multifunctional FOSS NIR-Systems DS2500 (FOSS Electric A/S; FOSS, Hillerod, Denmark) was used to scan the ground samples of common vetch. Spectral images were collected within the spectral range of 850 to 2,500 nm and with a spectral resolution of 0.5 nm. Prior to sample scanning, it is necessary to power on and preheat the instrument, followed by inspecting it using a standard sample cup once the performance test meets the qualification criteria to ensure normal operation. Subsequently, thorough cleaning of both the sample cup and test window is essential before filling the sample cup approximately two-thirds full for scanning initiation. Each sample should undergo two scans, with their average spectrum being considered as the final NIR scan spectrum for common vetch.

The WinISI IV (version 4.6.11; developed by Infrasoft International, Silver Spring, MD, USA) software was utilized in this study to establish, validate, and evaluate the prediction model for nutrient composition and mineral elements of common vetch. Initially, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on the average spectra of all samples to eliminate any abnormal spectra. Abnormal data were identified by applying a Global distance threshold (Global Hood≥3) and a T value criterion (T>2.5), resulting in the screening of spectral values. The WinISI IV (version 4.6.11; developed by Infrasoft International) software applies two derivative processing techniques and ten de-scattering methods to mitigate the influence of external factors on the spectrum, which methods include no operation at all (none), quadratic derivative range compensation (scale and quadratic), standard normal variable transformation combined with scattering correction (SNV and detrend), linear derivative range compensation (scale and linear), standard normal variable change only (SNV only), weighted MSC with scale and offset adjustment, detrend only operation, inverse discrete correction MSC operation, and standard multivariate discrete corrective treatment using MSC [13,14]. Mathematical treatments are hereafter referred to using numerals, such as 1, 4, 4, 1, in which numbers respectively represent the quantity of derivatives to be calculated, the discrepancy involved in derivative computation, the number of data points utilized for moving average or smoothing operations, and finally the number of points employed in secondary smoothing. In total thirty pretreatment techniques were utilized [15].

Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy modeling and performance evaluation

In this investigation, we randomly partitioned the preprocessed spectra into a calibration set (n = 152) and a validation set (n = 38) at a 4:1 ratio. The optimal spectral processing method was chosen by modified partial least squares method (MPLS), and the spectral absorption values were integrated with measured analytical values from the laboratory for regression analysis in constructing the prediction model. The assessment of model performance relies on the following metrics: calibration root means square error (RMSEC), cross-validation, predicted root mean square error (RMSECV and RMSEP), coefficient of determination (R2C) for calibration, coefficient of determination (R2CV) for cross-validation, coefficient of determination (R2p) for prediction, and residual prediction deviation (RPD) [16]. Among, a higher R2CV value, along with lower RMSEC and RMSECV values, indicates a more effective model. The closer the predicted coefficient of determination (R2p) is to 1.0, the higher the accuracy of the model; when 0<R2p≤ 0.25, it indicates that the established predictive model is not feasible [17]. During the validation stage, the model’s accuracy was assessed using RPD. An RPD>2.5 indicates exceptional performance and suitability for quality evaluation. If the 2.0≤RPD≤2.5, it suggests that the model is suitable for preliminary analysis of forage quality. If the RPD<2.0 indicates inadequate predictive performance, rendering the model unsuitable for practical use [18].

RPD=SDREMSEP (1)

In this equation, SD denotes the standard deviation of the reference values within the validation set.

Statistical analysis

All experimental data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 (version 26.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The data statistical model was constructed using common vetch samples as a fixed variable and each replicated as a random variable. The experimental unit was defined as the number of samples in both the calibration and validation sets. The nutritional composition and mineral element content of the common vetch sample were analyzed with SPSS 26.0 (version 26.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), including max, min, mean and standard deviation (SD). The spectral data preprocessing and prediction model for nutrients and mineral elements of common vetch will be established with WinISI IV (version 4.6.11; developed by Infrasoft International) software. Finally, the corresponding diagrams are generated by Origin 2019 (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA) software along with SIMCA (Sartorius Data Analytics, Malmö, Sweden) software.

RESULTS

Main compositions of common vetch samples

The nutrient composition and mineral element contents of common vetch are presented in Table 2. The coefficients of variation (CV) for CP, ash, iron (Fe), potassium (K), and phosphorus (P) were relatively high, at 29.70%, 28.53%, 55.93%, 33.94% and 28.00%, respectively. In contrast, the variability of DM, NDF, ADF, EE, OM, calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) was relatively low with CV at 0.73%, 13.34%, 14.78%, 18.75%, 26.55% and 17.14 % respectively. Additionally, the SD for all indicators ranged from 0.06 to 5.37.

Table 2.

Basic statistical data on the nutrient content and elemental composition of common vetch (DM basis)

Parameter Min (%) Max (%) Mean (%) SD CV (%)1)
DM 91.08 94.71 93.15 0.68 0.73
CP 7.17 38.21 17.71 5.26 29.70
NDF 29.34 58.55 40.25 5.37 13.34
ADF 19.19 43.57 28.68 4.24 14.78
Ash 3.92 16.53 10.13 2.89 28.53
EE 1.19 3.56 2.40 0.45 18.75
OM 76.14 90.00 83.02 3.19 3.84
Ca 0.93 3.12 1.77 0.47 26.55
P 0.13 0.42 0.25 0.07 28.00
K 0.74 3.93 2.21 0.75 33.94
Fe 0.01 0.16 0.06 0.03 55.93
Mg 0.23 0.51 0.35 0.06 17.14
1)

CV = (Standard deviation/Mean)×100.

DM, dry matter; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; EE, ether extract; OM, organic matter.

Spectral analysis

The mean near-infrared absorption spectra of the common vetch sample within the wavelength range of 850 to 2,500 nm are presented in Figure 1. As depicted in Figure 1A, the common vetch sample exhibits five distinct absorption peaks across the entire spectral range, specifically located at approximately 1,450, 1,740, 1,910, 2,120, and 2,350 nm respectively. Based on the findings illustrated in Figures 1B, 1C, it is evident that derivative processing significantly enhances the characteristic spectral peak. Furthermore, a comprehensive investigation of the spectral data of common vetch samples was conducted using PCA. The distribution of the primary components in NIR spectrum within both the calibration set and validation set is depicted in Figures 2A, 2B, respectively. These results obtained from PCA demonstrate the homogeneity and well-mixed nature of the principal components, accounting for more than 96 % of the spectral variance. Notably, Figure 2A reveals greater variations in the spectrum of the calibration set, emphasizing the representativeness of selected samples and facilitating optimization of NIR spectral modeling process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Original and preprocessed average NIR absorption spectra of common vetch samples in the range of 900 to 2,500 nm. (a) The original spectrum of the common vetch samples; (b) Spectrum after first derivative treatment of common vetch samples; (c) Spectrum after second derivative treatment of common vetch samples. NIR, near-infrared.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

PCA score of common vetch samples in calibration and validation set. (a) Calibration set of PCA scores for the samples of common vetch; (b) Validation set of PCA scores for the sample of common vetch. PCA, principal component analysis.

Development of calibration models for common vetch

In subsequent NIRS modeling, the calibration set, and validation set were determined based on the MPLS score. One sample was randomly selected from each five to be included in the validation set, while the remaining samples were used to construct the calibration set. As illustrated in Figure 2, the reference values of the validation set and calibration set samples exhibit comparable distributions and ranges, indicating that the validation set, and calibration sets are suitable for the establishment and verification of the NIRS equation. Consequently, this study employed a combination of MPLS technology, mathematical processing techniques, and scatter correction methods to establish each respective of 30 equations that correlated spectral data with nutrient and element content of common vetch. The optimal equation should be identified based on the value of R2CV. The specific results are as follows: for DM, the optimal combination of spectral processing and derivative processing is Scale and Linear (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.90; for CP, the optimal combination is Weighted MSC (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.96. The optimal combination for NDF is Inverse MSC (0, 0, 1, 1), with an R2CV of 0.93. For ADF, the optimal combination is SNV and Detrend (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.94. For EE, the optimal combination is SNV and Detrend (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.90. The optimal combination for OM is Weighted MSC (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.97. The optimal combination of Ca is Detrend only (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.92. Similarly, the optimal combination of P is Detrend only (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2cv of 0.82. The optimal combination of K is also Detrend only (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.86. The optimal combination of Mg is Weighted MSC (0, 0, 1, 1), with an R2CV of 0.82. The optimal combination of Fe is Scale and Quadratic (1, 4, 4, 1), with an R2CV of 0.74. Furthermore, the quantitative correction model, which was established using near-infrared spectroscopy, employs a series of evaluation parameters, including REMSEC, R2C, REMSECV, and R2CV. Of these, R2C and R2CV are approximately equal to 1, and RMSEC is approximately equal to 0, indicating that the constructed model is highly robust. A lower RMSECV value indicates a higher level of accuracy in the model’s predictive capabilities. The results of these evaluation parameters are presented in detail in Table 3. The ranges of each indicator of REMSEC and REMSECV are 0.01–1.25 and 0.01–1.37, respectively. Notably, the R2C values for P, Mg, and Fe are relatively low, at 0.89, 0.88, and 0.74, respectively, while the R2C values of the remaining indicators are all greater than 0.90. The values of P, K, Mg, and Fe in R2CV are relatively low at 0.82, 0.86, 0.82, and 0.74, respectively, while the R2CV of the other indicators are all above 0.90.

Table 3.

Establishing and selecting an optimized NIRS model for the assessment of nutrient composition and elemental content in common vetch

Component Sample number Treatment SD REMSEC R2C REMSECV R2CV
DM 152 Scale and linear (1,4,4,1) 0.66 0.18 0.93 0.21 0.90
CP 152 Weighted MSC (1,4,4,1) 5.05 0.97 0.96 1.12 0.96
NDF 152 Inverse MSC (0,0,1,1) 5.17 1.25 0.94 1.37 0.93
ADF 152 SNV and detrend (1,4,4,1) 4.14 0.93 0.95 1.04 0.94
Ash 152 Scale and quadratic (1,4,4,1) 2.83 0.47 0.97 0.59 0.96
EE 152 SNV and detrend (1,4,4,1) 0.43 0.10 0.95 0.14 0.90
OM 152 Weighted MSC (1,4,4,1) 3.13 0.43 0.98 0.56 0.97
Ca 116 Detrend only (1,4,4,1) 0.47 0.11 0.95 0.13 0.92
P 152 Detrend only (1,4,4,1) 0.06 0.02 0.89 0.03 0.82
K 116 SNV only (1,4,4,1) 0.77 0.22 0.92 0.26 0.86
Mg 116 Weighted MSC (0,0,1,1) 0.17 0.02 0.88 0.03 0.82
Fe 116 Scale and quadratic (1,4,4,1) 0.03 0.01 0.79 0.01 0.74

NIRS, near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy; SD, standard deviation; REMSEC, root mean standard error of calibration; R2C, coefficient of determination of calibration; REMSECV, mean standard error of cross-validation; R2CV, coefficient of determination of validation; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; EE, ether extract; OM, organic matter.

Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy prediction capability

The external validation set evaluation of the best model demonstrates its predictive ability, with relevant parameter values presented in Figure 3. RMSEP values for all indices ranged from 0.01 to 1.87, with CP, NDF, ADF and ash exhibiting higher RMSEP values above 1.0 while other indices displayed lower RMSEP values below 1.0. Correlation coefficients (R2p) between actual measured and predicted values are shown in Figure 4; the R2p values for K and Mg were 0.78, 0.80, and 0.70, respectively, indicating relatively modest prediction accuracy. Conversely, the R2pvalues for other nutrients and mineral elements ranged from 0.88 to 0.96. RPD values for P, K and Mg were all less than or equal to 2.5 whereas RPD value of other indicators was greater than or equal to 2.5 (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Predictive performance of MPLS Model for the nutrient and mineral element content in common vetch. RMSEP, root mean square error of prediction; Rp2, correlation coefficient of validation set; RPD, the ratio of prediction to deviation; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; EE, ether extract; OM, organic matter.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The correlation between the predicted values and measured values of nutritional composition and mineral element content in the optimal model of common vetch was investigated. R2p, correlation coefficient of validation set; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; EE, ether extract; OM, organic matter.

DISCUSSION

Currently, the breeding and genetics of common vetch have primarily focused on the adaptability and yield of different varieties in various regions, while neglecting the significance of nutritional quality and mineral elements [19]. Research has indicated that common vetches are extensively cultivated worldwide and possess abundant nutrients and mineral elements [20]. The rapid screening of the relationship between adaptation and nutritional quality in various regions is increasingly imperative. Among the promising alternative methods, NIRS is widely employed due to its capability to rapidly and accurately determine target quality components [21]. Therefore, the establishment of a NIRS prediction model can offer a more efficient and convenient approach for quality prediction and adaptation selection in diverse regions of common vetch. The accuracy and reliability of NIRS are widely believed to be primarily determined by the number of samples modeled and the variability of components [22]. To establish a more precise calibration model for quantitative analysis of nutrients and mineral elements in common vetch, we utilized the average spectrum from 190 different varieties of common vetch for modeling. The findings from this study demonstrate diversity and coefficient of variation in the nutritional quality among the selected samples, which can be attributed to variations in common vetch varieties. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate certain levels of variability in sample nutritional quality not only for establishing an accurate and comprehensive NIRS model but also ensuring its applicability for future predictions across various sample types and component contents [23].

In this study, we discovered that the original spectrum and spectral pattern of common vetch were consistent with previous research findings [24]. The spectrum of common vetch exhibits five prominent absorption peaks across the entire wavelength range, specifically located at approximately 1,450, 1,740, 1,910, 2,120 and 2,350 nm. Previous studies have indicated that within the ranges of 1,150 to 1,250, 1,400 to 1,650, 2,050 to 2,150 nm, as well as at wavelengths of 2,250 and 2,350 nm, C-H and O-H overtones originating from carbohydrates and sugars play a dominant role [25]. Cellulose C-H and O-H bonds exhibit signals at wavelengths around 1,470, 1,780, 1,845 and 2,085 nm. N-H overtone absorption bands are associated with proteins; these associations can be observed at approximately 1,455, 1,555, 1,742.5, 2,087.5 and 2,182.5 nm [26]. The peak value for the C-O stretchy overtone signal is close to 2,303.75 nm and the peak value for O-H bond sin water molecules appear sat approximately 1,432.5 and 1,932.5 nm [27].

To enhance the accuracy and reliability of the NIRS calibration model, most studies typically partition the sample subset into a calibration set and a validation set [28]. For this study, the calibration and validation sets were randomly allocated at a ratio of 4:1 based on modified partial least squares score. PCA analysis revealed that both validated and calibrated samples exhibited similar distributions and comparable ranges in terms of reference values, indicating their suitability for establishing and verifying NIRS equations. Subsequently, employing MPLS regression technology along with different wavelength ranges, mathematical processing techniques, and scattering correction methods resulted in the generation of 30 equations for each parameter index. The optimal model is selected by combining R2C and R2CV.

R2C values indicate the extent to which the model fits the calibration set. In NIRS analysis, a high R2C value indicates that the model can effectively elucidate the relationship between the absorption peaks of the calibration spectra and the properties of the samples, which enables us to identify the most stable and reliable models [29]. In this study, we observed that the R2C effect of K, P, Mg, and Fe is relatively limited compared to other indicators. This could be attributed to the narrow concentration range of these elements and their insufficient combination with organic compounds such as amino acids, proteins, and carbohydrates in the sample [30]. Additionally, a significant portion of these elements exist in the form of free ions within the sample without any absorption effect in the near-infrared spectral region. Consequently, no absorption peak is generated which hampers the establishment of a near-infrared prediction model [31]. In addition, modeling elements may need to consider a variety of chemical forms and states (such as organic carbon versus inorganic carbon), and these complex reactions and states may lead to challenges in the accuracy of the model, resulting in K, P, Mg, and Fe modeling effects greatly affected by the complexity of the sample [32]. In this study, the R2C values for DM, CP, NDF, ADF, ash, EE, and OM all exceeded 0.90. This high correlation can be attributed to the derivative and scattering correction treatment of the spectrum, which establishes a precise relationship between the spectral data and the nutrient content of common vetch at specific wavelengths and absorption intensities [33]. Studies have demonstrated that the integration of derivative analysis with descattering treatment markedly enhances the R2C value in establishing the predicted nutrient composition of beans, a finding that aligns with the results of this study [34]. In NIRS, the R2CV primarily serves to assess the model’s consistency and accuracy concerning spectral features and sample properties across various data subsets derived from the calibration set [35]. In this study, the R2CV values for DM, CP, NDF, ADF, ash, EE, and OM all exceeded 0.90. This high performance can be attributed to the selection of common vetch samples from diverse varieties and regions, ensuring a representative and varied dataset that enhances the model’s generalization capability [36]. Additionally, appropriate preprocessing methods were employed during modeling, and an adequate amount of data was utilized, which further contributed to the elevated R2CV values. The low R2CV values observed for P, Mg, K, and Fe in this study may be attributed to the relatively weak absorption signals of complex compounds formed by these mineral elements in the near-infrared spectrum. These weak signals are susceptible to interference and noise from other components, thereby complicating the model’s ability to accurately establish a quantitative relationship between these elements and the spectral data [37].

The validation set was utilized to assess the predictive capability of the NIRS model for determining nutrient and mineral element content in external common vetch samples. By validating the prediction set model, we observed that the RMSEP values for common vetch indicators ranged from 0.01 to 1.87, with CP, NDF, ADF, and ash exhibiting RMSEP values exceeding 1.0 while other indicators demonstrated values below 1.0. R2p values for P, K, and Mg were found to be 0.78, 0.80, and 0.70 respectively indicating relatively lower prediction accuracy, whereas R2p values for other nutrients and mineral elements ranged from 0.88 to 0.96. R2p is a critical metric for evaluating the accuracy of model predictions on independent test sets. In this study, the R2p values for DM, CP, NDF, ADF, ash, and OM were consistently high. Carbas et al demonstrated that R2p values are positively correlated with R2c and R2cv when using near-infrared spectroscopy to assess nutritional and anti-nutritional parameters in common legumes, findings which are consistent with our results [38]. Furthermore, the RMSEP value obtained in this study is relatively low, signifying minimal prediction error and superior model accuracy, which contributes significantly to the elevated R2p value observed [39].

In terms of RPD value, the values of P, K, and Mg are all below 2.5, whereas the RPD values of other indicators exceed 2.5. Based on a threshold of RPD≥2.5, the prediction results obtained from the constructed model demonstrate accuracy and applicability in practical quantitative analysis. When 2.0<RPD≤2.5, it indicates relatively lower prediction accuracy of the constructed model and is suitable for preliminary screening purposes only. If RPD<2.0, it implies that the effectiveness of the constructed model is significantly reduced and cannot be applied in actual production practice [40]. In this study, the prediction model for P, K, and Mg exhibited relatively poor performance, possibly due to the limited variability in their contents, weak correlation with certain major elements in the sample, inadequate sample size and range of variation, as well as alterations in their chemical bonds caused by fluctuations in temperature and humidity within the external environment during sample storage [41]. It is plausible that the absorption characteristics of P, K, and Mg in the near-infrared spectral region are either weak or significantly overlap with the spectral signatures of other components [32]. This complicates the accurate extraction of characteristic information for these elements from the spectrum, thereby impacting the prediction accuracy of the model and leading to a lower RPD value [42]. In this study, the RPD value for CP exceeds 4.0, indicating a high level of prediction accuracy [18]. The protein is abundant in N-H groups, which exhibit distinct characteristic absorption peaks in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral region. The position, intensity, and shape of these absorption peaks are closely associated with the chemical environment of the N-H groups and demonstrate a strong linear correlation with protein content [43]. By effectively capturing these features, the model establishes a robust correlation between spectral information and protein content, thereby minimizing the deviation between predicted and actual values and significantly enhancing the RPD value. In this study, the RPD values of NDF, ADF and OM all exceeded 3. This phenomenon can be attributed to the large number of C-H and O-H functional groups in these nutrients, which enable the model to effectively capture their characteristics and accurately correlate the spectral characteristics with the nutrients, thereby reducing the deviation between the predicted value and the actual value and thereby increasing the RPD value [44]. Furthermore, the modeling samples encompass a broad spectrum of sources and conditions, enabling the model to capture the spectral characteristics and content relationships of NDF, ADF, and OM across diverse scenarios [45]. For instance, when modeling common vetches, the samples include various common vetches grown under different environmental conditions, thereby enhancing the model’s adaptability to variations in NDF, ADF, and OM contents and improving prediction accuracy, which in turn increases the RPD value. In contrast, the RPD value for ash is relatively low, primarily because crude ash does not occur in isolation within actual samples. The surrounding organic components, such as proteins and carbohydrates, interfere with the weak spectral signals of mineral elements in ash [46]. This interference makes it challenging for the model to extract relevant spectral features associated with ash, thereby affecting the accurate prediction of ash content and consequently reducing the RPD value [47].

The accuracy of the model for P, K, and Mg contents is sufficient for screening purposes, while other parameter indicators can accurately predict their values and be applied in actual production. Some studies have evaluated the modeling efficacy of mineral element content in common raw beans. The findings indicate that the predictive performance for certain mineral elements is suboptimal, allowing only for preliminary screening [48]. This discrepancy may be attributed to interactions between mineral elements and nutrients components, leading to overlapping absorption peaks of different nutrients in the near-infrared spectral region [49]. Additionally, the formation of complexes between some mineral elements (such as Mg) and organic acids alters the original spectral characteristics of these elements, causing them to deviate from the typical absorption patterns observed in near-infrared spectra. Consequently, the overall prediction accuracy of the model is diminished [50]. The difference in results shown in this study may also be caused by the above results. Numerous studies have demonstrated the immense potential of NIR in screening quality traits of diverse plants [51,52]. This approach will also facilitate future cultivation of different varieties of common vetch. In forthcoming research, near-infrared spectroscopy could be employed to forecast genetic data of common vetch for enhanced screening of high-quality varieties.

The NIR model established in this study can be utilized for the screening of high-quality varieties of common vetches, including those with elevated protein content and fiber content, to facilitate the cultivation of mixed forage. This investigation not only presents a rapid, convenient, cost-effective, and accurate screening method for the efficient application of common vetch but also offers a robust strategy for its future large-scale cultivation and utilization.

CONCLUSION

In this study, NRIS coupled with a MPLS method was employed to develop a rapid and reliable analytical technique for determining nutrients and elements in common vetch. The results demonstrated that for DM, CP, NDF, ADF, ash, and OM, the R2p exceeded 0.90, and the RPD surpassed 2.5. For Ca, P, K, and Fe, R2p values ranged from 0.70 to 0.91, and RPD values exceeded 2.0. These findings suggest that the proposed model offers an efficient and accurate means for evaluating the quality of common vetch. This research holds significant theoretical and practical implications for enhancing the broad and efficient utilization of common vetch resources.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Wang T, Li F.

Data curation: Wang T, Wang L, Guo T.

Formal analysis: Shi Y.

Methodology: Wang T, Liu B.

Software: Wang L, Guo T.

Validation: Li F.

Investigation: Wang T.

Writing - original draft: Wang T.

Writing - review & editing: Wang T, Wang L, Guo T, Shi Y, Liu B, Li F.

FUNDING

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Leading Scientist Project of Qinghai Province (Grant No. 2023-NK-147), Key Science and Technology Program of Jinchang City (2024JC00152).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The platform and support provided by the Ruminant Research Institute of Grassland Agricultural Science and Technology College of Lanzhou University are greatly appreciated.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Not applicable.

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI

No AI tools were used in this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Larbi A, Hassan S, Kattash G, et al. Annual feed legume yield and quality in dryland environments in north-west Syria: 1. herbage yield and quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2010;160:81–9. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pastor-Cavada E, Juan R, Pastor JE, Alaiz M, Vioque J. Antioxidant activity of seed polyphenols in fifteen wild Lathyrus species from South Spain. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2009;42:705–9. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Remigi P, Zhu J, Young JPW, Masson-Boivin C. Symbiosis within symbiosis: evolving nitrogen-fixing legume symbionts. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huang Y, Li R, Coulter JA, Zhang Z, Nan Z. Comparative grain chemical composition, ruminal degradation in vivo, and intestinal digestibility in vitro of Vicia sativa L. varieties grown on the Tibetan plateau. Animals. 2019;9:212. doi: 10.3390/ani9050212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yolcu H, Gunes A, Turan M. Evaluation of annual legumes and barley as sole crops and intercrop in spring frost conditions for animal feeding II. Mineral composition. J Anim Vet Adv. 2009;8:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Greveniotis V, Bouloumpasi E, Zotis S, Korkovelos A, Ipsilandis CG. A stability analysis using AMMI and GGE biplot approach on forage yield assessment of common vetch in both conventional and low-input cultivation systems. Agriculture. 2021;11:567. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11060567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Oten M, Kiremitci S, Erdurmus C. Unveil of superior landraces of common vetch (Vicia sativa l.) for yield and yield components to overcome bottleneck. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2018;27:6324–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sanchez PDC, Hashim N, Shamsudin R, Nor MZM. Quality evaluation of sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas L.) of different varieties using laser light backscattering imaging technique. Sci Hortic. 2020;260:108861. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108861. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anderson JV, Wittenberg A, Li H, Berti MT. High throughput phenotyping of Camelina sativa seeds for crude protein, total oil, and fatty acids profile by near infrared spectroscopy. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;137:501–7. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang M, Li X, Shen Y, et al. A systematic high-throughput phenotyping assay for sugarcane stalk quality characterization by near-infrared spectroscopy. Plant Methods. 2021;17:76. doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00777-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li M, Wang J, Du F, Diallo B, Xie GH. High-throughput analysis of chemical components and theoretical ethanol yield of dedicated bioenergy sorghum using dual-optimized partial least squares calibration models. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:206. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0892-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Official methods of analysis. 21st ed. AOAC International; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jia J, Zhou X, Li Y, Wang M, Liu Z, Dong C. Establishment of a rapid detection model for the sensory quality and components of Yuezhou Longjing tea using near-infrared spectroscopy. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2022;164:113625. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Payne CE, Wolfrum EJ. Rapid analysis of composition and reactivity in cellulosic biomass feedstocks with near-infrared spectroscopy. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0222-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Escuredo O, Seijo-Rodríguez A, Inmaculada González-Martín M, Shantal Rodríguez-Flores M, Carmen Seijo M. Potential of near infrared spectroscopy for predicting the physicochemical properties on potato flesh. Microchem J. 2018;141:451–7. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.He HJ, Wang Y, Zhang M, Wang Y, Ou X, Guo J. Rapid determination of reducing sugar content in sweet potatoes using NIR spectra. J Food Compos Anal. 2022;111:104641. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104641. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miao X, Miao Y, Gong H, et al. NIR spectroscopy coupled with chemometric algorithms for the prediction of cadmium content in rice samples. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2021;257:119700. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang Z, Li K, Zhang M, Xin D, Zhang J. Rapid determination of chemical composition and classification of bamboo fractions using visible–near infrared spectroscopy coupled with multivariate data analysis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:35. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0443-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Santa IM, Nagel S, Taylor JD. Incorporating the pedigree information in multi-environment trial analyses for improving common vetch. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1166133. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1166133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang YF, Gao XL, Nan ZB, Zhang ZX. Potential value of the common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) as an animal feedstuff: a review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2017;101:807–23. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tomar M, Bhardwaj R, Kumar M, et al. Development of NIR spectroscopy based prediction models for nutritional profiling of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.)) R.Br: a chemometrics approach. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2021;149:111813. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111813. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu J, Jin S, Bao C, Sun Y, Li W. Rapid determination of lignocellulose in corn stover based on near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and chemometrics methods. Bioresour Technol. 2021;321:124449. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ejaz I, He S, Li W, et al. Sorghum grains grading for food, feed, and fuel using NIR spectroscopy. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:720022. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.720022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eum C, Jang D, Kim J, Choi S, Cha K, Chung H. Improving the accuracy of spectroscopic identification of geographical origins of agricultural samples through cooperative combination of near-infrared and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc. 2018;149:281–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2018.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Buratti S, Sinelli N, Bertone E, Venturello A, Casiraghi E, Geobaldo F. Discrimination between washed Arabica, natural Arabica and Robusta coffees by using near infrared spectroscopy, electronic nose and electronic tongue analysis. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95:2192–200. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sim J, McGoverin C, Oey I, Frew R, Kebede B. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy accurately predicted isotope and elemental compositions for origin traceability of coffee. Food Chem. 2023;427:136695. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Williams PC. Application of chemometrics to prediction of some wheat quality factors by near-infrared spectroscopy. Cereal Chem. 2020;97:958–66. doi: 10.1002/cche.10318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li M, He S, Wang J, Liu Z, Xie GH. An NIRS-based assay of chemical composition and biomass digestibility for rapid selection of Jerusalem artichoke clones. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:334. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1335-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang A, Hu Z, Hu X, et al. Large-scale screening of diverse barely lignocelluloses for simultaneously upgrading biomass enzymatic saccharification and plant lodging resistance coupled with near-infrared spectroscopic assay. Ind Crops Prod. 2023;194:116324. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Patel N, Toledo-Alvarado H, Cecchinato A, Bittante G. Predicting the content of 20 minerals in beef by different portable near-infrared (NIR) spectrometers. Foods. 2020;9:1389. doi: 10.3390/foods9101389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ikoyi AY, Younge BA. Influence of forage particle size and residual moisture on near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) calibration accuracy for macro-mineral determination. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;270:114674. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114674. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fang J, Jin X, Wu L, et al. Prediction models for the content of calcium, boron and potassium in the fruit of 'Huangguan' pears established by using near-infrared spectroscopy. Foods. 2022;11:223642. doi: 10.3390/foods11223642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nuwamanya E, Wembabazi E, Kanaabi M, et al. Development and validation of near-infrared spectroscopy procedures for prediction of cassava root dry matter and amylose contents in Ugandan cassava germplasm. J Sci Food Agric. 2024;104:4793–800. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Carbas B, Machado N, Oppolzer D, et al. Comparison of near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy for the determination of nutritional and antinutritional parameters in common beans. Food Chem. 2020;306:125509. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.González-Martín I, Hernández-Hierro JM, González-Cabrera JM. Use of NIRS technology with a remote reflectance fibre-optic probe for predicting mineral composition (Ca, K, P, Fe, Mn, Na, Zn), protein and moisture in alfalfa. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;387:2199–205. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-1039-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kämper W, Trueman SJ, Tahmasbian I, Bai SH. Rapid determination of nutrient concentrations in hass avocado fruit by Vis/NIR hyperspectral imaging of flesh or skin. Remote Sens. 2020;12:3409. doi: 10.3390/rs12203409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yu Y, Chai Y, Li Z, Ren Z, Dong H, Chen L. Quantitative predictions of protein and total flavonoids content in Tartary and common buckwheat using near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Food Chem. 2025;462:141033. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Carbas B, Machado N, Oppolzer D, et al. Comparison of near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy for the determination of nutritional and antinutritional parameters in common beans. Food Chem. 2020;306:125509. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zaukuu JLZ, Zimmermann E, Acquah BB, Kwofie ED. Novel detection techniques for shrimp powder adulteration using near infrared spectroscopy in tandem chemometric tools and multiple spectral preprocessing. Food Anal Methods. 2023;16:819–31. doi: 10.1007/s12161-023-02460-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thomson AL, Humphries DJ, Rymer C, Archer JE, Grant NW, Reynolds CK. Assessing the accuracy of current near infra-red reflectance spectroscopy analysis for fresh grass-clover mixture silages and development of new equations for this purpose. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018;239:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shi D, Hang J, Neufeld J, Zhao S, House JD. Estimation of crude protein and amino acid contents in whole, ground and defatted ground soybeans by different types of near-infrared (NIR) reflectance spectroscopy. J Food Compos Anal. 2022;111:104601. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Babos DV, Ramos JFK, Francisco GC, Benites VM, Milori DMBP. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and digital image data fusion for determination of the Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, and P in mineral fertilizer: overcome matrix effects in solid direct analysis. J Opt Soc Am B. 2023;40:654–60. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.482619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.González-Martín MI, Escuredo O, Hernández-Jiménez M, et al. Prediction of stable isotopes and fatty acids in subcutaneous fat of Iberian pigs by means of NIR: a comparison between benchtop and portable systems. Talanta. 2021;224:121817. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ancin-Murguzur FJ, Tarroux A, Bråthen KA, Bustamante P, Descamps S. Using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to estimate carbon and nitrogen stable isotope composition in animal tissues. Ecol Evol. 2021;11:10483–8. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hossain MM, Rahim MA, Moutosi HN, Das L. Evaluation of the growth, storage root yield, proximate composition, and mineral content of colored sweet potato genotypes. J Agric Food Res. 2022;8:100289. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.de Aldana BRV, Criado BG, Ciudad AG, Corona MEP. Estimation of mineral content in natural grasslands by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1995;26:1383–96. doi: 10.1080/00103629509369379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sepúlveda MÁ, Hidalgo M, Araya J, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy: alternative method for assessment of stable carbon isotopes in various soil profiles in Chile. Geoderma Reg. 2021;25:e00397. doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wafula EN, Onduso M, Wainaina IN, et al. Antinutrient to mineral molar ratios of raw common beans and their rapid prediction using near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2022;368:130773. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lu Y, Jia B, Yoon SC, et al. Macro-micro exploration on dynamic interaction between aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus and maize kernels using Vis/NIR hyperspectral imaging and SEM technology. Int J Food Microbiol. 2024;416:110661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rodríguez-Espinosa ME, Guevara-Oquendo VH, Yang JC, Feng X, Zhang W, Yu P. Processing induced changes in physicochemical structure properties and nutrient metabolism and their association in cool-season faba (CSF: Vicia L.), revealed by vibrational FTIR spectroscopy with chemometrics and nutrition modeling techniques. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61:1099–107. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1754160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu GS, Guo HS, Pan T, Wang JH, Cao G. Vis-NIR spectroscopic pattern recognition combined with SG smoothing applied to breed screening of transgenic sugarcane. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2014;34:2701–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tang C, Jiang B, Ejaz I, et al. High-throughput phenotyping of nutritional quality components in sweet potato roots by near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics methods. Food Chem X. 2023;20:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Bioscience are provided here courtesy of Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP)

RESOURCES