Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Jul;111(9):1145–1147. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5730

No evidence of dioxin cancer threshold.

David Mackie 1, Junfeng Liu 1, Yeong-Shang Loh 1, Valerie Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC1241565  PMID: 12842764

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an estimate of the human cancer risk from dioxin, using the standard low-dose linear extrapolation approach. This estimate has been controversial because of concern that it may overestimate the cancer risk. An alternative approach has been published and was presented to the U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board's Dioxin Review Panel in November 2000. That approach suggests that dioxin is a threshold carcinogen and that the threshold is an order of magnitude above the exposure levels of the general population. We have reexamined the threshold analysis and found that the data have been incorrectly weighted by cohort size. In our reanalysis, without the incorrect weighting, the threshold effect disappears.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (139.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becher H., Steindorf K., Flesch-Janys D. Quantitative cancer risk assessment for dioxins using an occupational cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 (Suppl 2):663–670. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertazzi P. A., Bernucci I., Brambilla G., Consonni D., Pesatori A. C. The Seveso studies on early and long-term effects of dioxin exposure: a review. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 (Suppl 2):625–633. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fingerhut M. A., Halperin W. E., Marlow D. A., Piacitelli L. A., Honchar P. A., Sweeney M. H., Greife A. L., Dill P. A., Steenland K., Suruda A. J. Cancer mortality in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jan 24;324(4):212–218. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199101243240402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flesch-Janys D., Steindorf K., Gurn P., Becher H. Estimation of the cumulated exposure to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans and standardized mortality ratio analysis of cancer mortality by dose in an occupationally exposed cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 (Suppl 2):655–662. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ott M. G., Zober A. Morbidity study of extruder personnel with potential exposure to brominated dioxins and furans. II. Results of clinical laboratory studies. Occup Environ Med. 1996 Dec;53(12):844–846. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.12.844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Steenland K., Deddens J., Piacitelli L. Risk assessment for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) based on an epidemiologic study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Sep 1;154(5):451–458. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.5.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES