Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Sep;111(12):1454–1460. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6286

Mosquito coil emissions and health implications.

Weili Liu 1, Junfeng Zhang 1, Jamal H Hashim 1, Juliana Jalaludin 1, Zailina Hashim 1, Bernard D Goldstein 1
PMCID: PMC1241646  PMID: 12948883

Abstract

Burning mosquito coils indoors generates smoke that can control mosquitoes effectively. This practice is currently used in numerous households in Asia, Africa, and South America. However, the smoke may contain pollutants of health concern. We conducted the present study to characterize the emissions from four common brands of mosquito coils from China and two common brands from Malaysia. We used mass balance equations to determine emission rates of fine particles (particulate matter < 2.5 microm in diameter; PM(2.5)), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), aldehydes, and ketones. Having applied these measured emission rates to predict indoor concentrations under realistic room conditions, we found that pollutant concentrations resulting from burning mosquito coils could substantially exceed health-based air quality standards or guidelines. Under the same combustion conditions, the tested Malaysian mosquito coils generated more measured pollutants than did the tested Chinese mosquito coils. We also identified a large suite of volatile organic compounds, including carcinogens and suspected carcinogens, in the coil smoke. In a set of experiments conducted in a room, we examined the size distribution of particulate matter contained in the coil smoke and found that the particles were ultrafine and fine. The findings from the present study suggest that exposure to the smoke of mosquito coils similar to the tested ones can pose significant acute and chronic health risks. For example, burning one mosquito coil would release the same amount of PM(2.5) mass as burning 75-137 cigarettes. The emission of formaldehyde from burning one coil can be as high as that released from burning 51 cigarettes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (341.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azizi B. H., Henry R. L. The effects of indoor environmental factors on respiratory illness in primary school children in Kuala Lumpur. Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Mar;20(1):144–150. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce N., Perez-Padilla R., Albalak R. Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(9):1078–1092. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang J. Y., Lin J. M. Aliphatic aldehydes and allethrin in mosquito-coil smoke. Chemosphere. 1998 Feb;36(3):617–624. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(97)00357-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daisey J. M., Mahanama K. R., Hodgson A. T. Toxic volatile organic compounds in simulated environmental tobacco smoke: emission factors for exposure assessment. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1998 Jul-Sep;8(3):313–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ezzati M., Kammen D. M. Quantifying the effects of exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion on acute respiratory infections in developing countries. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 May;109(5):481–488. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fagbule D., Ekanem E. E. Some environmental risk factors for childhood asthma: a case-control study. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1994;14(1):15–19. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1994.11747686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Klepeis N. E., Ott W. R., Repace J. L. The effect of cigar smoking on indoor levels of carbon monoxide and particles. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1999 Nov-Dec;9(6):622–635. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu W. K., Ng T. B., Wong C. C. Biochemical and cellular changes in bronchoalveolar lavaged samples from rats after inhalation of mosquito-coil smoke. Toxicol Lett. 1989 Feb;45(2-3):121–132. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(89)90001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu W. K., Sun S. E. Ultrastructural changes of tracheal epithelium and alveolar macrophages of rats exposed to mosquito coil smoke. Toxicol Lett. 1988 May;41(2):145–157. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(88)90088-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu W. K., Wong M. H. Toxic effects of mosquito coil (a mosquito repellent) smoke on rats. II. Morphological changes of the respiratory system. Toxicol Lett. 1987 Dec;39(2-3):231–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(87)90238-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lukwa N., Chandiwana S. K. Efficacy of mosquito coils containing 0.3% and 0.4% pyrethrins against An.gambiae sensu lato mosquitoes. Cent Afr J Med. 1998 Apr;44(4):104–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanderson E. G., Farant J. P. Use of benzo[a]pyrene relative abundance ratios to assess exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient atmosphere in the vicinity of a Söderberg aluminum smelter. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Dec;50(12):2085–2092. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu Xu, Weisel Clifford P. Inhalation exposure to haloacetic acids and haloketones during showering. Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Feb 1;37(3):569–576. doi: 10.1021/es025747z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang J., Smith K. R. Hydrocarbon emissions and health risks from cookstoves in developing countries. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1996 Apr-Jun;6(2):147–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Z. W., Sun J. X., Chen S. Y., Wu Y. Q., He F. S. Levels of exposure and biological monitoring of pyrethroids in spraymen. Br J Ind Med. 1991 Feb;48(2):82–86. doi: 10.1136/oem.48.2.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES