Abstract
In LAMP-2–deficient mice autophagic vacuoles accumulate in many tissues, including liver, pancreas, muscle, and heart. Here we extend the phenotype analysis using cultured hepatocytes. In LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes the half-life of both early and late autophagic vacuoles was prolonged as evaluated by quantitative electron microscopy. However, an endocytic tracer reached the autophagic vacuoles, indicating delivery of endo/lysosomal constituents to autophagic vacuoles. Enzyme activity measurements showed that the trafficking of some lysosomal enzymes to lysosomes was impaired. Immunoprecipitation of metabolically labeled cathepsin D indicated reduced intracellular retention and processing in the knockout cells. The steady-state level of 300-kDa mannose 6-phosphate receptor was slightly lower in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes, whereas that of 46-kDa mannose 6-phosphate receptor was decreased to 30% of controls due to a shorter half-life. Less receptor was found in the Golgi region and in vesicles and tubules surrounding multivesicular endosomes, suggesting impaired recycling from endosomes to the Golgi. More receptor was found in autophagic vacuoles, which may explain its shorter half-life. Our data indicate that in hepatocytes LAMP-2 deficiency either directly or indirectly leads to impaired recycling of 46-kDa mannose 6-phosphate receptors and partial mistargeting of a subset of lysosomal enzymes. Autophagic vacuoles may accumulate due to impaired capacity for lysosomal degradation.
INTRODUCTION
Lysosomes are acidic membrane-bound organelles containing hydrolytic enzymes for degradation of proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides. Lysosomal enzymes are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum and sorted in the trans-Golgi network (TGN) by mannose 6-phosphate receptors (MPRs). MPRs bind the mannose 6-phosphate tag of lysosomal enzymes in the trans-Golgi network (TGN), and the receptor-ligand complexes are transported to endosomes in clathrin-coated vesicles. In endosomes ligands dissociate from the MPRs due to the acidic pH, and receptors may then recycle back to TGN. A small proportion of newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes is secreted to the extracellular medium (Jadot et al., 1997). Mammalian cells contain two different MPRs, the cation-independent or 300-kDa MPR, and the cation-dependent or 46-kDa MPR. Both receptors are needed for efficient intracellular retention of lysosomal enzymes (Kasper et al., 1996). In addition MPRs also recycle between early endosomes and the plasma membrane. However, only MPR300 is able to mediate endocytosis of exogenous mannose 6-phosphate containing ligands (Hille-Rehfeld, 1995).
The limiting membrane of the lysosomal compartment has multiple functions. It is responsible for acidification of the interior, sequestration of the active lysosomal enzymes (Kornfeld and Mellman, 1989), and transport of degradation products from the lysosomal lumen to the cytoplasm (Lloyd and Forster, 1986; Fukuda, 1991; Peters and von Figura, 1994). The lysosomal membranes contain several highly N-glycosylated proteins including LAMP-1 and LAMP-2. These two glycoproteins are structurally similar and evolutionary related (Granger et al., 1990). Like LAMP-1, LAMP-2 is composed of a large luminal portion, which is separated by a proline-rich hinge region in two disulphide containing domains, a single transmembrane-spanning segment, and a short cytoplasmic tail of 11 amino acids (Lewis et al., 1985; Fambrough et al., 1988). The latter contains a Gly-Tyr motif critical for transport to lysosomes (Guarnieri et al., 1993; Höning and Hunziker, 1995). LAMP-2 is one of the major carriers for poly-N-acetyllactosamines in cells (Fukuda, 1991).
Although the ubiquitously expressed LAMP-2 is localized primarily in the late endosomes and lysosomes (Lippincott-Schwartz and Fambrough, 1987), under certain circumstances, e.g., after platelet activation, during granulocytic differentiation and activation, in malignant carcinoma cells, and in cytotoxic T lymphocytes, it is also found at the cell surface (Febbraio and Silverstein, 1990; Lee et al., 1990). LAMP-2 has also been described as a receptor for the selective import and degradation of cytosolic proteins in the lysosome, or chaperone-mediated autophagy (Cuervo and Dice, 1996, 1998).
Autophagy is a central mechanism in cellular metabolism that cells use to degrade parts of their cytoplasm and organelles using lysosomal enzymes. The autophagic-lysosomal pathway is known to play an important role in the cellular protein economy (Mortimore et al., 1989; Seglen and Bohley, 1992). In hepatocytes exposed to nutrient starvation it can account for as much as three quarters of the overall protein degradation (Mortimore et al., 1989; Seglen and Bohley, 1992). The first step in autophagy is segregation of cytoplasm by a membrane cisterna, which forms a double or multiple membrane-bound vacuole called the autophagosome. Autophagosomes acquire lysosomal membrane proteins, vacuolar proton pumps, and acid hydrolases, presumably by fusing with endosomes/lysosomes. Finally, the contents are degraded by lysosomal enzymes (Arstila and Trump, 1968; Dunn, 1994; Klionsky and Emr, 2000). The autophagic pathway is subject to complex regulation, it is activated in mammalian cells by amino acid deprivation (Mitchener et al., 1976; Seglen, 1987; Talloczy et al., 2002).
LAMP-2 deficiency leads to premature postnatal death of about half of all LAMP-2–deficient mice (Tanaka et al., 2000). In several LAMP-2–deficient tissues, including muscle, heart, pancreas, and liver, an accumulation of autophagic vacuoles was observed. We also observed a reduced contractile function of the heart muscle. Thus, LAMP-2–deficient mice represent a valuable animal model for autophagic vacuolar myopathy, or Danon disease, a human disease associated with a mutated LAMP-2 gene (Nishino et al., 2000). Here we extend the phenotype analysis of these mice using cultured hepatocytes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Primary Antibodies
The following antibodies were used in this study: Rabbit antiserum against mouse cathepsin D (Pohlmann et al., 1995), rabbit antiserum against rat liver cathepsin D purified from lysosomal contents by affinity chromatography on pepstatin A-sepharose as described (Yamamoto et al., 1979), affinity-purified rabbit antibody against the cytoplasmic tail of MPR46 (MSC1; Klumperman et al., 1993), rabbit antiserum against human MPR46 (II-4; Wenk et al., 1991), rabbit antiserum against rat MPR300 (I-5; Claussen et al., 1995), mouse mAb against γ-adaptin (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), and rat monoclonal antibodies against LAMP-2 (ABL93) and LAMP-1 (1D4B; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, Iowa).
Preparation of Primary Mouse Hepatocytes
Mouse hepatocytes were prepared from 3- to 6-month-old mice according to a described procedure (Meredith, 1988). Hepatocytes were enriched using a Percoll gradient (58% wt/vol) and plated on collagen-coated or -uncoated plastic culture dishes. Unless stated otherwise, the cells were cultured overnight in RPMI-1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) before the experiments.
Endocytic Uptake
Six-nanometer gold particles were prepared (Slot and Geuze, 1985) and coated with bovine serum albumin (BSA). BSA-gold was dialyzed against RPMI-1640 medium and diluted to serum-free RPMI containing 0.2% BSA. After uptake the cells were rinsed and fixed for electron microscopy.
Immunofluorescence
Hepatocytes were grown on glass coverslips. The cells were fixed with cold methanol or 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES, pH 7.4, and permeabilized with 0.5% saponin or 0.1% Triton X-100. The cells were immunostained using antibodies against MPR46. The primary antibodies were detected with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with Texas red or fluorescein (Dianova GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). After embedding in Mowiol (Calbiochem-Novabiochem GmbH, Bad Soden, Germany) containing DABCO, fluorescence was examined using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM 2; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Western Blotting
Expression of cathepsin-D, MPR46, and MPR300 was analyzed in hepatocyte homogenates (cathepsin D) and membrane fractions (receptors). Hepatocytes were homogenized in Tris-buffered saline (wt/vol; 1:9) at 4°C using an Ultra-Turrax, and the homogenate was analyzed for protein content. To obtain membrane fractions cell pellets were resuspended in TBS including proteinase inhibitors, subjected to sonication (3 times, 200 s), and pelleted at high speed (100,000 × g). The resulting pellet was resuspended in TBS/proteinase inhibitors/1% Triton X-100 and subjected to sonication (3 times, 20 s). One hundred micrograms of protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE (5% polyacrylamide in case of MPR300; 10% in case of MPR46 and cathepsin D) under reducing conditions. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Schleicher & Schüll, Dassel, Germany), which was subsequently blocked with 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4, 0.05% Triton X-100, 5% milk powder (blocking buffer) for 1 h at 37°C. The blot was incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-mouse cathepsin-D, anti-MPR46 MSC1, or anti-MPR300 serum. Membranes were washed six times for 5 min in 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween 20. Subsequently, incubation with horseradish peroxidase–coupled anti-rabbit antibody was performed for 1 h at room temperature followed by washing six times for 5 min in 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween 20. Blots were finally analyzed using the ECL Detection System (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Quantification was performed by densitometry (Scan Jet 4c/T; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA; WinCam 2.2).
Metabolic Labeling and Immunoprecipitation
Hepatocytes were incubated in methionine-free medium for 1 h and then labeled with 35S-methionine/cysteine (Amersham Life Science, Inc., Rockville, MD) in the same medium containing 5% dialyzed FCS. During the chase, the medium was supplemented with 0.25 mg/ml l-methionine/l-cysteine. Immunoprecipitation from cells and media was carried out as described previously (Waheed et al., 1988) with rabbit antibodies against cathepsin-D, MPR46 (II-4), or MPR300. Densitometric quantification of the bands was done with a phosphoimager (Fuji, Stamford, CT) and the program MacBas.
Incubation of Cells with Radioactive Glucosylthioceramide and thioGM3
An aliquot of a stock solution of the desired glucosylthioceramide and thioGM3 in methanol was dried under a stream of nitrogen. The dried lipid was dissolved by first adding 20 μl of ethanol and then 0.75 ml of RPMI containing 5 mg of defatted BSA under vigorous stirring. The resulting solution was diluted with 6.85 ml of RPMI to yield a 10 μM lipid-BSA complex.
Hepatocytes seeded on 6-cm dishes were washed in RPMI and incubated with the [14C]C8-Glc-S-Cer/BSA complex or the [14C]thioGM3/BSA complex in RPMI for 3 h at 37°C, washed with PBS, and further incubated for 24 h at 37°C in RPMI containing 5% heat-inactivated FCS. The incubation media were saved, and the cells were washed with PBS, harvested with a rubber policeman, and centrifuged at 2000 × g for 10 min. For protein determination, the pellet was suspended in 0.4 ml of H2O, and 5-μl aliquots were assayed. The lipids were extracted with 4 ml of chloroform/methanol (1:1, by volume) for 3 h at 38°C. The lipid extracts and the media were desalted according to Williams and McCluer (1980). Total radioactive lipids of both cells and media were determined by liquid scintillation counting of aliquots. The lipid extracts of cells and media were analyzed by TLC using chloroform/methanol/15 mM calcium chloride (60:35:8, by volume) as the developing solvent. In addition, TLC plates were exposed to x-ray film (Kodak X-Omat XAR-5; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
Northern Blotting
Total RNA of cultured hepatocytes was prepared using the Qiagen Rneasy system (Hilden, Germany). Ten micrograms of total RNA were separated in a formaldehyde agarose gel and processed as described (Isbrandt et al., 1994). Filters were hybridized with a MPR46 and MPR300 cDNA probe (Köster et al., 1991) and a β-actin probe (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Hybridization and washing of the filters were performed as described (Lehmann et al., 1992).
Electron Microscopy and Autophagosome Quantification
Isolated hepatocytes were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M HEPES, pH 7.4, at room temperature for 2 h. The cells were scraped off the culture dish, pelleted, and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 1 h. The cells were dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in Epon. For estimation of volume fractions by stereology (Howard and Reed, 1998), 20–25 micrographs, primary magnification ×10,000, were taken with systematic random sampling from each sample. The cytoplasmic volume fraction of autophagic vacuoles was estimated by point counting. Autophagic vacuoles were classified as early, containing morphologically intact cytoplasm, and late, containing partially degraded but identifiable cytoplasmic material (Tanaka et al., 2000). Statistical significance was estimated using Student's t test.
Immunogold Electron Microscopy and Quantitation
Cultured hepatocytes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.2 M HEPES, pH 7.4, at room temperature for 2 h and then stored in 2% paraformaldehyde for up to 4 d. Some samples were fixed by adding 0.1% glutaraldehyde to the initial fixative. The cells were then embedded in gelatin and processed for cryosectioning as described (Andrejewski et al., 1999). Cryosections were picked up with 2.3 M sucrose or a mixture of sucrose and 2% methyl cellulose. The sections were labeled with rabbit antibodies against MPR46 (MSC1), mouse anti–γ-adaptin, or rat anti–LAMP-1 or –LAMP-2. The primary antibodies were detected with goat anti-rabbit-IgG, goat anti-rat-IgG, or goat anti-mouse IgG coupled to 5 or 10 nm gold (British BioCell, Cardiff, UK). Double labelings were done by mixing two primary antibodies, from different species, and the corresponding secondary antibodies, conjugated to different sized gold particles. The smaller gold size was used for the less abundant antigen. Density of LAMP-2 labeling on the limiting membranes of autophagic vacuoles was estimated as described (Tanaka et al., 2000). To quantitate the distribution of MPR46 labeling, the sections were systematically screened under the electron microscope, and each time a gold particle was seen, it was recorded into a certain cellular compartment, as explained in Table 2, or into an unrecognizable compartment. To estimate MPR46 labeling in endosome associated tubular and vesicular structures (Klumperman et al., 1993), LAMP-1–positive multivesicular endosomes of 200–800-nm diameter (Figure 8, B–D) were systematically scored. Gold particles situated inside and outside, within a distance of 300–400 nm of the endosomes, were counted. At least 40 endosomal profiles, from two independent samples, were counted, and the results were expressed as a ratio of gold inside/gold outside.
Table 2.
Control | LAMP-2 −/− | |
---|---|---|
MPR46 and γ-adaptin double labeling | ||
Golgi regiona | 28.0 ± 0.3 | 7.6 ± 1.3 |
Total gold scored | 1804 | 1780 |
MPR46 and LAMP-1 double labeling | ||
LAMP-1–negative AVsb | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 |
LAMP-1–positive AVsb | 3.5 ± 1.6 | 13.7 ± 2.2 |
LAMP-1–positive endo/lysosomes | 12.0 ± 2.5 | 13.0 ± 3.1 |
Plasma membrane | 10.44 ± 1.62 | 11.73 ± 1.33 |
Total gold scored | 2630 | 2176 |
MPR46 inside/outside of MVBc | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.2 |
Total number of MVB scored | 43 | 46 |
The results are means ± SEM from two independent cultures of control and LAMP-2 −/− hepatocytes.
Golgi region was defined by γ-adaptin labeling and presence of the Golgi stack.
Autophagic vacuoles (AVs) were identified by the presence of cytoplasmic material (rough ER, mitochondria) inside the vacuoles.
The ratio of labeling inside versus outside of LAMP-1–positive multivesicular endosome profiles (MVB) was estimated as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS.
Enzyme Activities
Hepatocytes were isolated and cultured overnight. After washing with PBS the cells were incubated in RPMI medium containing 5% heat-inactivated FCS. After 6, 12, and 24 h, samples of the medium were removed and cells were washed, scraped, and homogenized in TBS/1% Triton X-100. Lysosomal enzyme activities were detected using fluorometric and colorometric assays as described (Köster et al., 1993). To avoid a possible effect of the medium change leading to nonspecific increase of lysosomal enzyme activities, the enzyme activity in the medium after 6-h culture was withdrawn from the specific activities measured in the medium after 12 and 24 h. In each experiment the enzyme activities were measured from two parallel culture dishes. Statistical significance was evaluated using Student's t test.
RESULTS
We observed accumulation of both early autophagic vacuoles (Avi), containing morphologically intact cytoplasm, and late autophagic vacuoles (Avd), containing partially degraded cytoplasmic material, in liver and cultured hepatocytes of LAMP-2–deficient mice (Tanaka et al., 2000). We performed immunogold labeling of control hepatocytes to examine the presence of LAMP-2 in autophagic vacuoles and detected labeling in both Avi and Avd (for Avi see Figure 1). Quantitation of LAMP-2 labeling on the limiting membrane showed that the labeling in Avd was five times higher than that in Avi. This enrichment of LAMP-2 in Avd is similar to that observed for LAMP-1 (Tanaka et al., 2000).
Half-life of Autophagic Vacuoles
Long-lived protein degradation is decreased in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes (Tanaka et al., 2000), suggesting that autophagic vacuoles accumulate because of impaired degradation of autophagocytosed material. To clarify this, we determined the half-life of autophagic vacuoles using quantitative electron microscopy. Isolated hepatocytes were incubated in starvation medium (free of serum and amino acids) for 5 h to induce autophagy. Subsequently the fate of the autophagic vacuoles was followed by shifting the cells to FCS containing medium, supplemented with 10 mM 3-methyladenine (3MA) to prevent formation of new autophagosomes (Seglen and Gordon, 1982, 1984). Samples for electron microscopy were taken before the starvation, after 5-h starvation, and 1- and 3-h chase in full medium with 3MA, as indicated in Figure 2. The volume fractions of Avi, Avd, and endosomes/lysosomes were estimated using stereology. The latter compartment included all endo/lysosomal vesicles lacking morphologically identifiable cytoplasmic material, i.e., early and late endosomes and lysosomes. In control cells (Figure 2, A and B) the volume fraction of Avi and Avd increased ∼3.8-fold (p = 0.0012) and 1.7-fold (p = 0.078), respectively, during 5-h starvation. After 1-h chase in full medium with 3MA, almost all Avi had disappeared from the control cells (p = 0.000015 compared with the 5-h starvation). This suggests that Avi matured into Avd and these in turn degraded their contents. During the 3-h chase the size of Avd decreased in control cells (p = 0.047 compared with the 5-h starvation), suggesting further degradation of the cytoplasmic material.
Consistent with our previous findings (Tanaka et al., 2000), the volume fractions of both Avi and Avd were much higher in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes. Also the volume fraction of endo/lysosomes was twice as high as in the control cells (Figure 2, A–C). Starvation did not increase the volume fraction of total Avi/Avd/endo/lysosomal pool in LAMP-2–deficient cells, suggesting that autophagy cannot be further stimulated by starvation. However, we observed a small increase in Avd volume fraction (p = 0.041) on the expense of endo/lysosomes (p = 0.051). During the 1-h chase in full medium and 3MA, less than half of the Avi volume fraction was consumed (p = 0.016), indicating retarded conversion of Avi into Avd. Approximately corresponding increase was observed in the volume fraction of endo/lysosomes (p = 0.0029), which suggests initial maturation of some Avd into lysosomes. During the 3-h chase no further decrease of Avi volume fraction was observed, whereas the volume of Avd tended to increase (p = 0.08311 compared with the 5-h starvation). This increase in Avd may point to fusion with plasma membrane derived endosomes, which would increase the volume fraction similar to maturation of Avi into Avd. The results indicate that in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes the consumption of Avd is severely retarded and that the half-lives of both Avi and especially Avd are prolonged.
Fusion of Endosomes with Autophagic Vacuoles
In LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes the pH in Avi and Avd is only slightly higher than in control cells and the limiting membranes of Avd contain substantial amounts of LAMP-1 (Tanaka et al., 2000). This suggests that transport of membrane proteins such as the vacuolar proton pump and LAMP-1 to Avi and/or Avd does take place. To directly demonstrate the convergence of endocytic and autophagic pathways we used 6-nm gold particles coated with BSA (BSA-gold) as a fluid phase endocytic tracer. To check that the knockout hepatocytes are able to perform fluid-phase endocytosis at rates comparable to that of the control cells, the cells were fed with horseradish peroxidase for 10–30 min and washed, and the peroxidase activity was assayed from cell homogenates. The results revealed that the rate of fluid-phase uptake is comparable in LAMP-2–deficient and control hepatocytes. BSA-gold was then fed to cells for 1 h, and the cells were chased for 2 h. Electron microscopy was used to score the distribution of gold particles in endo/lysosomes and autophagic vacuoles. Typical fusion profiles of Avd and multivesicular endosomes in LAMP-2–deficient cells are presented in Figure 3, A and B. In control cells, ∼20% of gold particles were found in Avd, compared with >40% in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes (Figure 3C). The larger fraction of gold in Avd in LAMP-2–deficient cells may be due to the prolonged half-life of these organelles, resulting in trapping of the tracer within Avd. The result indicates that multivesicular endosomes are able to fuse with autophagic vacuoles in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes.
Trafficking of Lipids between the Plasma Membrane, Lysosomes, and the Golgi
We studied the uptake of the nondegradable glycosphingolipid glucosylthioceramide ([14C]C8-Glc-S-Cer). A fraction of the internalized glucosylthioceramide is transported to the Golgi as indicated by its elongation to GM2 and GM3 by Golgi resident glycosyltransferases (Schwarzmann and Sandhoff, 1990; Schwarzmann et al., 1995; Schwarzmann, 2001). The glucosylthioceramide was taken up by control and LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes. In both genotypes Golgi-specific glycosylation products (e.g., GM2 and GM3) were detected to a comparable level in cells and media (Figure 4, lanes 1–4). The appearance of glycosylation products in culture media containing FCS is due to transport of the glycosylation products from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane and to the extraction of the semitruncated glycolipids by protein components of the FCS.
Having shown that hepatocytes allow efficient uptake and trafficking of labeled sphingolipids, we studied the metabolism of the partially degradable thioganglioside ([14C]S-GM3). This compound allows to follow the trafficking of the internalized thioganglioside to endosomes/lysosomes, where it is degraded to glycosylthioceramide, and the trafficking of glucosylthioceramide to the Golgi where it is elongated to GM2 and GM3. GM2 and GM1 originating from elongation of the added GM3 contain neuraminic acid. In contrast, the GM3, GM2, and GM4 originating from glucosylthioceramide generated from the added GM3 in the lysosomes contain the hepatocyte derived N-glycolyl-neuraminic acid and are thereby distinguishable (Schwartzmann, 2001). The uptake, accumulation, and degradation in lysosomes and the subsequent transport of the labeled lipids to the Golgi apparatus and elongation to N-glycolyl neuraminic acid containing thiogangliosides GM3 and GM2 were similar in LAMP-2–deficient and control hepatocytes (Figure 4, lanes 6–9). This indicates that transport of lipids from the plasma membrane to lysosomes and from there to the Golgi apparatus is not affected by LAMP-2 deficiency.
Activities and Trafficking of Lysosomal Enzymes
The prolonged half-life of autophagic vacuoles could result from impaired degradation of their content. Impaired acidification as a cause for compromised lysosomal degradation has already been excluded (Tanaka et al., 2000). We therefore determined the activities of lysosomal enzymes in isolated hepatocytes and liver homogenates as well as the trafficking and maturation of newly synthesized cathepsin D, a major lysosomal proteinase. The activities of three representative lysosomal hydrolases were differentially affected in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes. Intracellular β-mannosidase activity of LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes was decreased to ∼14% of control (p = 0.022), β-glucuronidase was unchanged, and β-hexosaminidase seemed to be increased about twofold, although this increase was not statistically significant (Table 1). Interestingly, the activity of β-mannosidase was only moderately affected in liver homogenates of LAMP-2–deficient mice (0.43 ± 0.03 vs. 0.59 ± 0.08 U/g in control liver). This indicates that the β-mannosidase activity in nonparenchymal liver cells is normal. The fraction of enzyme activity recovered in the secretion was elevated 2.55–4.7-fold for β-mannosidase (p = 0.022) and β-glucuronidase (p = 0.017) and not affected for β-hexosaminidase (Table 1). This indicates mistargeting of a subset of lysosomal enzymes into the culture medium.
Table 1.
Control
|
LAMP-2 −/−
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cells (mU/mg) | Medium (% of total) | Cells (mU/mg) | Medium (% of total) | |
β-Mannosidase | 1.33 ± 0.33 (3) | 5.7 ± 0.79 | 0.19 ± 0.07 (4) | 14.53 ± 0.02 |
p = 0.022* | p = 0.022* | |||
β-Hexosaminidase | 8.28 ± 3.5 (2) | 17.09 ± 1.0 | 16.54 ± 3.5 (2) | 15.64 ± 0.86 |
p = 0.12 | p = 0.19 | |||
β-Glucuronidase | 3.13 ± 0.55 (2) | 1.83 ± 0.63 | 3.45 ± 0.26 (2) | 8.61 ± 0.24 |
p = 0.67 | p = 0.017* |
Values are means ± SEM; number of independent cultures used for each value is given in parentheses.
p values indicating statistical significance of the difference between the control and LAMP-2 −/− cells.
Cathepsin-D was quantified in hepatocytes by Western blotting. The total amount of cathepsin-D was decreased ∼2.5-fold in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes. In particular the amount of the catalytically active forms of cathepsin-D, the 46-kDa processing intermediate, and the mature 30- and 14-kDa polypeptides were decreased in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes, whereas that of the 52-kDa precursor form was increased (Figure 5A).
The 3- to 5-fold higher fraction of β-mannosidase and β-glucuronidase in the secretions (Table 1) and the decrease of proteolytically processed cathepsin-D forms in the hepatocytes points to a missorting of newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes into the secretions. To follow the fate of newly synthesized cathepsin-D, hepatocytes were metabolically labeled, and cathepsin-D was immunoprecipitated from cells and media (Figure 5B). We observed in LAMP-2–deficient cells an increased secretion of cathepsin-D. After 6-h chase, 47% of cathepsin-D was recovered in the secretions and 21% had been proteolytically processed to the 46-kDa intermediate. In control hepatocytes 14% had been secreted, and 68% were proteolytically processed to the catalytically active intermediate.
Taken together these results show that missorting contributes to the lower levels of cathepsin-D in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes and possibly also to the intracellular deficiency of β-mannosidase as well as to the increased proportion of β-glucuronidase in the culture medium.
Expression of MPR300
Missorting of cathepsin-D and two other lysosomal enzymes into secretion suggested that LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes might have a defect in the function of MPRs. We first investigated the expression of MPR300. Western blotting showed comparable protein levels in control and LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes (Figure 6A). Densitometric quantitation from 17 independent cultures revealed that LAMP-2–deficient cells had 78.3 ± 22.6% (mean ± SD) of the protein level found in control hepatocytes. Metabolically labeled MPR300 had comparable half-lives in control and LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes (Figure 6B).
Half-life and Localization of MPR46
We next performed Western blotting of MPR46 (Figure 7A). Densitometric quantitation of bands from 10 independent cultures revealed that the steady state level of MPR46 was reduced to 27.5 ± 8.9% of controls in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes. However, Northern blotting showed that the level of MPR46 mRNA was comparable to the control (Figure 7B). Stability of metabolically labeled MPR46 showed MPR46 to have a shortened half-life in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes: 41–42% of newly synthesized receptor was recovered in LAMP-2–deficient cells after 12-h chase (Figure 7C), compared with 96% in control cells. Addition of lysosomal protease inhibitors, leupeptin and pepstatin, to the chase medium rescued the half-life in knockout cells to control level (Figure 7C), suggesting that degradation by lysosomal proteinases contributes to the shorter half-life.
The shortened half-life of MPR46 prompted us to study its intracellular localization. Immunofluorescence showed that in control cells MPR46 was localized to the perinuclear region as vesicular-reticular labeling (Figure 7D), consistent with earlier results showing that MPR46 is located in the TGN, endosomes, and small cytoplasmic vesicles (Klumperman et al., 1993). In the LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes MPR46 labeling was observed in only 42% of cells, whereas 95% of control hepatocytes showed labeling. Thus, there is an apparent inconsistency between the Western blot (27.5% the protein level of controls) and immunofluorescence labeling of MPR46. However, 27% of average protein level could be a result from 1) 27% of cells expressing normal amount of protein, or 2) all cells expressing only 27% of protein, or any combination of these two. In addition, immunofluorescence does not detect labeling if the local concentration of the protein is low, such as the concentration of MPR46 on the plasma membrane. In LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes with detectable MPR46, the receptor was found more distributed throughout the cytoplasm and less concentrated in the perinuclear region (Figure 7E).
To investigate localization of MPR46 in the TGN, we performed double immunogold labeling of MPR46 with γ-adaptin. In control hepatocytes the most concentrated MPR46 labeling was found in the Golgi region, identified by γ-adaptin labeling and the presence of a Golgi stack (Figure 8A). In LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes the proportion of MPR46 label found in the Golgi region was reduced to 27% of the control (Table 2). With γ-adaptin double labeling it was not possible to unequivocally identify the compartments where the rest of MPR46 was located. We thus also performed double labeling of MPR46 with LAMP-1. In control hepatocytes MPR46 was frequently found in small membrane structures surrounding LAMP-1–positive multivesicular endosomes (Figure 8B). In LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes less MPR46 labeling was observed in these structures (Figure 8C). The ratio of MPR46 labeling inside versus outside of multivesicular endosomes was 4.8 times higher in LAMP-2–deficient cells (Table 2). In addition more MPR46 was found inside autophagic vacuoles in LAMP-2–deficient cells (Figure 8, C and D). Quantitation showed that 3.9–5.2 times more MPR46 labeling was found in autophagic vacuoles (Table 2). Typically the MPR46-positive autophagic vacuoles were fusion profiles of an Avd and a multivesicular endosome (Figure 8, C and D). Taken together, our results show that in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes MPR46 accumulates in Avd/endosomes, suggesting that defective sorting out of endosomes leads to faster degradation of the protein.
DISCUSSION
We have shown that intracellular retention of cathepsin-D, β-glucuronidase, and β-mannosidase is impaired in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes. We also could show altered localization of MPR46, including accumulation in Avd, less MPR46 in the Golgi region, and altered localization within endosomes. In control hepatocytes MPR46 was frequently found in small membrane structures surrounding LAMP-1–positive multivesicular endosomes (Figure 8B). These structures have been called “endosome associated vesicles and tubules,” and they are thought to participate in MPR46 recycling out of the endosomes (Klumperman et al., 1993; Nicoziani et al., 2000). We observed less MPR46 in these structures in LAMP-2–deficient cells (Figure 8, C and D, and Table 2). During targeting of lysosomal enzymes, MPR46 and MPR300 deliver newly synthesized enzymes to early or late endosomes (Ludwig et al., 1991; Diesner et al., 1993), after which they may recycle back to TGN from late endosomes. Because in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes, endosomes and late autophagic vacuoles readily fuse (Figure 3), both compartments can be assumed to act as starting point for receptor recycling. The ratio of MPR46 in the Golgi region versus MPR46 in endo/lysosomes and AVd was 1.81 in control and 0.28 in LAMP-2 knockout cells (Table 2). Together with the lower amount of MPR46 in endosome-associated vesicles and tubules, this suggests that the recycling of MPR46 from endosomes back to the TGN is less efficient in LAMP-2–deficient cells. However, we also observed that the transport of lipids from endo/lysosomes to the Golgi is not affected by LAMP-2 deficiency (Figure 4), suggesting that the recycling defect may be specific to MPR46.
The recycling defect may be due to a failure to sort MPR46 in endosomes. Localization to different endosomal subcompartments is known to be the basis of sorting between the endosome-to-plasma membrane recycling and early endosome-to-late endosome transport routes (Robinson et al., 1996; Lemmon and Traub, 2000). MPRs are thought to recycle to the TGN from late endosomes (Hirst et al., 1998; Rohn et al., 2000), which are also called multivesicular bodies or the prelysosomal compartment (Griffiths et al., 1988). Reduced ability to recycle MPR46 from late endosomes has been shown to lead to transport of the receptors to lysosomes where they are degraded (Schweizer et al., 1996, 1997). Because the endocytic and autophagic pathways merge, we observed enrichment of MPR46 in autophagic vacuoles (Table 2). Impaired trafficking of MPR46 could explain partial mistargeting of a subset of lysosomal enzymes to the extracellular medium, which in turn could be one cause for the impaired capacity for lysosomal degradation of long-lived proteins observed in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes (Tanaka et al., 2000). Thus, rather than by decreased fusion of autophagic vacuoles with lysosomes, the increased half-life and accumulation of autophagic vacuoles can be explained by defective lysosomal biogenesis.
In this study we observed impairment of intracellular retention for cathepsin D, β-mannosidase, and β-glucuronidase. Intracellular activity of β-hexosaminidase appeared to be increased but the proportion of activity recovered in the culture medium was comparable to controls (Table 1). This suggests that the increased intracellular activity is likely due to increased synthesis. Partial mistargeting of a subset of lysosomal enzymes is in agreement with the findings that we observed a shorter half-life of MPR46, whereas the half-life of MPR300 was comparable to controls. Both MPRs are necessary for normal targeting of lysosomal enzymes (Kasper et al., 1996; Munier-Lehmann et al., 1996). In addition, other lysosomal enzyme targeting mechanisms exist besides the mannose 6-phosphate mediated route (Rijnboutt et al., 1991; Glickman and Kornfeld, 1993).
We observed a lower steady state level and shorted half-life for MPR46 in LAMP-2–deficient cells, whereas those of MPR300 were comparable to the control. Although the endosomal sorting and/or trafficking of both receptors may be impaired in LAMP-2–deficient cells, their susceptibility to lysosomal degradation or acidic pH may vary. Alternatively LAMP-2 deficiency may impair, directly or indirectly, recycling of MPR46 but not MPR300. In spite of being impaired in degrading autophagocytosed cytoplasm, LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes are able to acidify autophagic vacuoles (Tanaka et al., 2000).
MPR46 dissociates from its ligands in acidic environment (Hoflack and Kornfeld, 1985; Holzman, 1989; Ma et al., 1991). Using the pH indicator drug DAMP, we estimated the pH of Avd to be 5.7 in control and 5.8 in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes (Tanaka et al., 2000). Also the pH in multivesicular endosomes was close to the controls (pH 5.8) in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes (pH 5.9, unpublished observations). This suggests that impaired acidification in endosomes or Avd is not the cause of impaired MPR46 recycling and accumulation in Avd.
How could LAMP-2 deficiency lead to impaired recycling of MPR46 from late endosomes to the TGN? One possibility is that LAMP-2 is necessary for sorting of MPR46 inside endosomes, either directly or indirectly by stabilizing factors needed for recycling. LAMP-2 has been shown to mediate transport of a specific set of cytosolic proteins across the lysosomal membrane in chaperone-mediated autophagy (Cuervo and Dice, 1996, 1998). Thus it is possible that LAMP-2 could participate in chaperone-mediated transport of recycling promoting factors from the cytoplasm to the endosomal lumen. Another possibility is that LAMP-2 is needed to prevent transport of MPR46 from endosomes to lysosomes and thus to increase the probability that the receptor will have time to reach the endosomal subcompartment that is destined for recycling to the TGN. LAMP-2 has been shown to recycle between the lysosomal limiting membrane and matrix and thus regulate the rate of chaperone-mediated autophagy (Jadot et al., 1996; Cuervo and Dice, 2000). Downregulation of chaperone-mediated autophagy by LAMP-2 levels has been proposed to mediate epidermal growth factor–induced cell growth in renal tubular cells (Franch et al., 2001). These findings show that LAMP-2 is not merely a structural component of the lysosomal membrane but has more sophisticated functions.
Yet another possible explanation for the decreased intracellular protein degradation in LAMP-2–deficient cells is that LAMP-2 deficiency leads to selective disturbances in lysosomal functions, including the observed β-mannosidase deficiency, and β-glucuronidase and cathepsin-D mistargeting. LAMP-2 has been suggested to play a role in intralysosomal matrix formation (Jadot et al., 1997). This could in turn lead to secondary effects such as impaired receptor recycling. It is also possible that altered trafficking of lysosomal enzymes and loss of MPR46 are separate events caused by loss of LAMP-2. Still another, although less likely explanation of altered lysosomal enzyme trafficking would be altered activity and/or localization of uncovering enzyme. This enzyme performs the final cleavage step in the biogenesis of mannose 6-phosphate tag (Faulhaber et al., 1998; Rohrer and Kornfeld, 2001). Further studies are needed to differentiate between these possible connections between LAMP-2 deficiency and lysosomal enzyme targeting.
MPR46 knockout mice had a normal phenotype, although partial missorting of many lysosomal enzymes into secretion was observed in cells isolated from these mice (Köster et al., 1993; Ludwig et al., 1993). Lysosomal storage was not detected in liver by electron microscopy (Köster et al., 1993). However, in intact tissues the increased secretion of lysosomal enzymes was shown to be compensated by uptake via carbohydrate-specific endocytic receptors (Köster et al., 1994). Our preliminary results suggest that, although fluid-phase endocytic uptake is normal, receptor-mediated endocytic uptake is impaired in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes, suggesting that the compensatory uptake is not functional in LAMP-2–deficient mice. This could explain the more severe phenotype in LAMP-2–deficient mice and isolated hepatocytes.
Inhibition of the phosphoinositide 3 kinase Vps34 by a dominant negative form of this enzyme has been reported to cause a similar mistargeting of cathepsin D (Row et al., 2001) as observed in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes. On the other hand Vps34 has also been shown to be necessary for autophagosome formation (Blommaart et al., 1997; Petiot et al., 2000). Because we see a profound accumulation of autophagic vacuoles in LAMP-2–deficient hepatocytes, we can relatively safely conclude that Vps34 is functional in these cells and thus rule out Vps34 deficiency as an explanation of the defect in lysosomal enzyme targeting.
Why do we only see accumulation of autophagic vacuoles in some tissues of LAMP-2–deficient mice, including pancreas, liver parenchyme, heart, muscle, capillary endothelium of kidney, intestinal wall, lymph nodes, and neutrophilic leukocytes (Tanaka et al., 2000), while other tissues such as brain and fibroblasts seem to be normal? Many of the affected tissues in LAMP-2–deficient mice are those that have a high degree of autophagy in normal animals. Using mainly rat tissues, active autophagy has been described at least in liver (Pfeifer and Strauss, 1981; Kovacs et al., 1982; de Waal et al., 1986), pancreas (Kovacs et al., 1988), muscle (Salminen and Vihko, 1984; Bahro et al., 1992), heart (Pfeifer and Strauss, 1981; Dammrich and Pfeifer, 1983), and kidney (Pfeifer and Scheller, 1975; Bahro et al., 1988). This suggests that active ongoing autophagy in normal conditions may be the prerequisite for the observed phenotype of autophagic vacuole accumulation in LAMP-2–deficient tissues.
It should be noted that the structurally related LAMP-1 might compensate in part for the loss of LAMP-2 in LAMP-2–deficient mice. These compensating functions are supported by the phenotype of LAMP-1/LAMP-2 double-deficient mice. Although the single-deficient mice are fertile and viable (Andrejewski et al., 1999; Tanaka et al., 2000), the loss of both LAMP molecules leads to embryonic lethality associated with accumulation of autophagic vacuoles in almost all embryonic tissues (P. Saftig, unpublished data).
In summary, instead of being only a structural component of the lysosomal membrane, LAMP-2 plays a more dynamic role than previously anticipated in cellular processes such as macro autophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy, and receptor trafficking. To further elucidate the postulated LAMP-2 function in receptor sorting and/or trafficking, it will be important to identify possible binding partners of LAMP-2. Coimmunoprecipitation and yeast two-hybrid screen experiments will possibly bring more light to this intriguing question.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Ellen Eckerman and Anegret Schneeman for technical assistance. This study was funded by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SA683/1–3) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie to P.S., a grant from The Royal Society to E.-L.E, and grants from the Ministry of Labor, Health, and Welfare of Japan and the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan to Y.T. A.L.I. was supported by the Graduiertenkolleg 60.
Abbreviations used:
- Avi
early autophagic vacuole
- Avd
late autophagic vacuole
- BSA
bovine serum albumin
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- LAMP
lysosomal associated membrane protein
- LBPA
lysobisphosphatidic acid
- 3MA
3-methyladenine
- MPR
mannose 6-phosphate receptor
- TGN
trans-Golgi network
Footnotes
Article published online ahead of print. Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.E02–02–0114. Article and publication date are at www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E02–02–0114.
REFERENCES
- Andrejewski N, Punnonen EL, Guhde G, Tanaka Y, Lullmann-Rauch R, Hartmann D, von Figura K, Saftig P. Normal lysosomal morphology and function in LAMP-1-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:12692–12701. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.18.12692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arstila AU, Trump BF. Studies on cellular autophagocytosis. The formation of autophagic vacuoles in the liver after glucagon administration. Am J Pathol. 1968;53:687–733. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bahro M, Gertig G, Pfeifer U. Short-term stimulation of cellular autophagy by furosemide in the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop in the rat kidney. Cell Tissue Res. 1988;253:625–629. doi: 10.1007/BF00219753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bahro M, Pfeifer U, Dammrich J. Involvement of autophagic degradation in ACTH-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Clin Neuropathol. 1992;11:64–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blommaart EFC, Krause U, Schellens JPM, Vreeling-Sindelarova H, Meijer AJ. The phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY294002 inhibit autophagy in isolated rat hepatocytes. Eur J Biochem. 1997;243:240–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.0240a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Claussen M, Buergisser D, Schuller AG, Matzner U, Braulke T. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-6 and mannose 6-phosphate/IGF-II receptor expression in IGF-IL-overexpressing NIH 3T3 cells. Mol Endocrinol. 1995;9:902–912. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.7.7476972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuervo AM, Dice JF. A receptor for the selective uptake and degradation of proteins by lysosomes. Science. 1996;273:501–503. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5274.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuervo AM, Dice JF. Lysosomes, a meeting point of proteins, chaperones, and proteases. J Mol Med. 1998;76:6–12. doi: 10.1007/s001090050185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuervo AM, Dice JF. Regulation of Lamp2a Levels in the Lysosomal Membrane. Traffic. 2000;1:570–583. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dammrich J, Pfeifer U. Cardiac hypertrophy in rats after supravalvular aortic constriction. II. Inhibition of cellular autophagy in hypertrophying cardiomyocytes. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1983;43:287–307. doi: 10.1007/BF02932962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Waal EJ, Vreeling-Sindelarova H, Schellens JPM, Houtkooper JM, James J. Quantitative changes in the lysosomal vacuolar system of rat hepatocytes during short-term starvation. A morphometric analysis with special reference to macro- and microautophagy. Cell Tissue Res. 1986;243:641–648. doi: 10.1007/BF00218073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diesner F, Sommerlade HJ, Braulke T. Transport of newly synthesized arylsulfatase A to the lysosome via transferrin receptor-positive compartments. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;197:1–7. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn WA. Autophagy and related mechanisms of lysosomal-mediated protein degradation. Trends Cell Biol. 1994;4:139–143. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(94)90069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fambrough DM, Takeyasu K, Lippincott-Schwarz J, Siegel NR. Structure of LEP100, a glycoprotein that shuttles between lysosomes and the plasma membrane, deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the encoding cDNA. J Cell Biol. 1988;106:61–67. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faulhaber J, Fensom A, Hasilik A. Abnormal lysosomal sorting with an enhanced secretion of cathepsin D precursor molecules bearing monoester phosphate groups. Eur J Cell Biol. 1998;77:134–140. doi: 10.1016/S0171-9335(98)80081-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Febbraio M, Silverstein RL. Identification and characterization of Lamp-1 as an activation-dependent platelet surface glycoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:18531–18537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franch HA, Sooparb S, Du J. A mechanism regulating proteolysis of specific proteins during renal tubular cell growth. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:19126–19131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101777200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuda M. Lysosomal membrane glycoproteins. Structure, biosynthesis, and intracellular trafficking. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:21327–21330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glickman JN, Kornfeld S. Mannose 6-phosphate-independent targeting of lysosomal enzymes in I-cell disease B lymphoblasts. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:99–108. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Granger BL, Green SA, Gabel CA, Howe CL, Mellman I, Helenius A. Characterization and cloning of lgp110, a lysosomal membrane glycoprotein from mouse and rat cells. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:12036–12043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffiths G, Hoflack B, Simons K, Mellman I, Kornfeld S. The mannose 6-phosphate receptor and the biogenesis of lysosomes. Cell. 1988;52:329–3241. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guarnieri FG, Arterburn LM, Penno MB, Cha Y, August JT. The motif Tyr-X-X-hydrophobic residue mediates lysosomal membrane targeting of lysosome-associated membrane protein 1. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1941–1946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hille-Rehfeld A. Mannose 6-phosphate receptors in sorting and transport of lysosomal enzymes. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1995;1241:177–194. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(95)00004-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirst J, Futter CE, Hopkins CR. The kinetics of mannose 6-phosphate receptor trafficking in the endocytic pathway in HEp-2 cells: the receptor enters and rapidly leaves multivesicular endosomes without accumulating in a prelysosomal compartment. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:809–816. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.4.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoflack B, Kornfeld S. Purification and characterization of a cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor from murine P388D1 macrophages and bovine liver. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:12008–12014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holzman E. Lysosomes. New York: Plenum Press; 1989. p. 439. pp. [Google Scholar]
- Höning S, Hunziker W. Cytoplasmic determinants involved in direct lysosomal sorting, endocytosis, and basolateral targeting of rat lgp120 (lamp-1) in MDCk cells. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:464–473. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.3.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howard CV, Reed MG. Unbiased stereology. Three-dimensional measurement in microscopy. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998. p. 246. pp. [Google Scholar]
- Isbrandt D, Arlt G, Brooks DA, Hopwood JJ, von Figura K, Peters C. Mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome): six unique arylsulfatase B gene alleles causing variable disease phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54:454–463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jadot M, Dubois F, Wattiaux-De Coninck S, Wattiaux R. Supramolecular assemblies from lysosomal matrix proteins and complex lipids. Eur J Biochem. 1997;249:862–869. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00862.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jadot M, Wattiaux R, Mainferme F, Dubois F, Claessens A, Wattiaux-De Coninck S. Soluble form of Lamp II in purified rat liver lysosomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;223:353–359. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasper D, Dittmer F, von Figura K, Pohlmann R. Neither type of mannose 6-phosphate receptor is sufficient for targeting of lysosomal enzymes along intracellular routes. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:615–623. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.3.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. 2000;290:1717–1721. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klumperman J, Hille A, Veenendaal T, Oorschot V, Stoorvogel W, von Figura K, Geuze HJ. Differences in the endosomal distributions of the two mannose 6-phosphate receptors. J Cell Biol. 1993;121:997–1010. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.5.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kornfeld S, Mellman I. The biogenesis of lysosomes. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1989;5:483–525. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.05.110189.002411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Köster A, Nagel G, von Figura K, Pohlmann R. Molecular cloning of the mouse 46-kDa mannose 6-phosphate receptor (MPR 46) Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1991;372:297–300. doi: 10.1515/bchm3.1991.372.1.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Köster A, Saftig P, Matzner U, von Figura K, Peters C, Pohlmann R. Targeted disruption of the Mr 46 000 mannose 6-phosphate receptor gene in mice results in misrouting of lysosomal proteins. EMBO J. 1993;12:5219–5223. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06217.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Köster A, von Figura K, Pohlmann R. Mistargeting of lysosomal enzymes in Mr46 000 mannose 6-phosphate receptor-deficient mice is compensated by carbohydrate-specific endocytotic receptors. Eur J Biochem. 1994;224:685–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kovacs AL, Reith A, Seglen PO. Accumulation of autophagosomes after inhibition of hepatocytic protein degradation by vinblastine, leupeptin or a lysosomotropic amine. Exp Cell Res. 1982;137:191–201. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kovacs J, Laszlo L, Kovacs AL. Regression of autophagic vacuoles in pancreatic acinar, seminal vesicle epithelial, and liver parenchymal cells: a comparative morphometric study of the effect of vinblastine and leupeptin followed by cycloheximide treatment. Exp Cell Res. 1988;174:244–251. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(88)90158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee N, Wang WC, Fukuda M. Granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells is associated with increase of poly-N-acetyllactosamine in Asn-linked oligosaccharides attached to human lysosomal membrane glycoproteins. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:20476–20487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann LE, Eberle W, Krull S, Prill V, Schmidt B, Sander C, von Figura K, Peters C. The internalization signal in the cytoplasmic tail of lysosomal acid phosphatase consists of the hexapeptide PGYRHV. EMBO J. 1992;11:4391–4399. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05539.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemmon SK, Traub LM. Sorting in the endosomal system in yeast and animal cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:457–466. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00117-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis V, Green SA, Marsh M, Vihko P, Helenius A, Mellman I. Glycoproteins of the lysosomal membrane. J Cell Biol. 1985;100:1839–1847. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.6.1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lippincott-Schwartz J, Fambrough DM. Cycling of the integral membrane glycoprotein, LEP100, between plasma membrane and lysosomes: kinetic and morphological analysis. Cell. 1987;49:669–677. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90543-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd JB, Forster S. The lysosome membrane. TIBS. 1986;11:365–368. [Google Scholar]
- Ludwig T, Griffiths G, Hoflack B. Distribution of newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes in the endocytic pathway of normal rat kidney cells. J Cell Biol. 1991;115:1561–1572. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.6.1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ludwig T, Ovitt CE, Bauer U, Hollinshead M, Remmler J, Lobel P, Ruther U, Hoflack B. Targeted disruption of the mouse cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor results in partial missorting of multiple lysosomal enzymes. EMBO J. 1993;12:5225–5235. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06218.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma ZM, Grubb JH, Sly WS. Cloning, sequencing, and functional characterization of the murine 46-kDa mannose 6-phosphate receptor. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:10589–10595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meredith MJ. Rat hepatocytes prepared without collagenase: prolonged retention of differentiated characteristics in culture. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1988;4:405–425. doi: 10.1007/BF00117769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchener JS, Shelburne JD, Bradford WD, Hawkins HK. Cellular autophagocytosis induced by deprivation of serum and amino acids in HeLa cells. Am J Pathol. 1976;83:485–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mortimore GE, Poso AR, Lardeux BR. Mechanism and regulation of protein degradation in liver. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1989;5:49–70. doi: 10.1002/dmr.5610050105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munier-Lehmann H, Mauxion F, Bauer U, Lobel P, Hoflack B. Re-expression of the mannose 6-phosphate receptors in receptor-deficient fibroblasts. Complementary function of the two mannose 6-phosphate receptors in lysosomal enzyme targeting. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:15166–15174. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.25.15166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicoziani P, Vilhardt F, Llorente A, Hilout L, Courtoy PJ, Sandvig K, van Deurs B. Role for dynamin in late endosome dynamics and trafficking of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:481–495. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.2.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishino I, et al. Primary LAMP-2 deficiency causes X-linked vacuolar cardiomyopathy and myopathy (Danon disease) Nature. 2000;406:906–910. doi: 10.1038/35022604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peters C, von Figura K. Biogenesis of lysosomal membranes. FEBS Lett. 1994;346:146–150. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00499-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petiot A, Ogier-Denis E, Blommaart EFC, Meijer AJ, Codogno P. Distinct classes of phosphatidyl-inositol 3′-kinase are involved in signaling pathways that control macroautophagy in HT-29 cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:992–998. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.2.992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfeifer U, Scheller H. A morphometric study of cellular autophagy including diurnal variations in kidney tubules of normal rats. J Cell Biol. 1975;64:608–621. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.3.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfeifer U, Strauss P. Autophagic vacuoles in heart muscle and liver. A comparative morphometric study including circadian variations in meal-fed rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1981;13:37–49. doi: 10.1016/0022-2828(81)90227-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pohlmann R, Wendland M, Boeker C, von Figura K. The two mannose 6-phosphate receptors transport distinct complements of lysosomal proteins. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:27311–27318. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.27311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rijnboutt S, Kal AJ, Geuze HJ, Aerts H, Strous GJ. Mannose 6-phosphate-independent targeting of cathepsin D to lysosomes in HepG2 cells. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:23586–23592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson MS, Watts C, Zerial M. Membrane dynamics in endocytosis. Cell. 1996;84:13–21. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80988-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohn WM, Rouille Y, Waqguri S, Hoflack B. Bi-directional trafficking between the trans-Golgi network and the endosomal/lysosomal system. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:2093–2101. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.12.2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohrer J, Kornfeld S. Lysosomal hydrolase mannose 6-phosphate uncovering enzyme resides in the trans-Golgi network. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:1623–1631. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.6.1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Row PE, Reaves BJ, Domin J, Luzio JP, Davidson HW. Overexpression of a rat kinase-deficient phosphoinositide 3-kinase, Vps34p, inhibits cathepsin D maturation. Biochem J. 2001;353:655–661. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3530655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salminen A, Vihko V. Autohagic response to strenuous exercise in mouse skeletal muscle fibers. Virchovs Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1984;45:97–106. doi: 10.1007/BF02889856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzmann G. Uptake and metabolism of exogenous glycosphingolipids by cultured cells. Sem Cell Dev Biol. 2001;12:163–171. doi: 10.1006/scdb.2000.0233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzmann G, Hofmann P, Putz U, Albrecht B. Demonstration of direct glycosylation of nondegradable glycosylceramide alalogs in cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:21271–21276. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.36.21271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzmann G, Sandhoff K. Metabolism and intracellular transport of glycosphingolipids. Biochemistry. 1990;29:10865–10871. doi: 10.1021/bi00501a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schweizer A, Kornfeld S, Rohrer J. Cysteine34 of the cytoplasmic tail of the cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor is reversibly palmitoylated and required for normal trafficking and lysosomal enzyme sorting. J Cell Biol. 1996;132:577–584. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.4.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schweizer A, Kornfeld S, Rohrer J. Proper sorting of the cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor in endosomes depends on a pair of aromatic amino acids in its cytoplasmic tail. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:14471–14476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seglen PO. Regulation of autophagic protein degradation in isolated liver cells. In: Glaumann H, Ballard FJ, editors. Lysosomes: Their Role in Protein Breakdown. London: Orlando; 1987. pp. 371–414. [Google Scholar]
- Seglen PO, Bohley P. Autophagy and other vacuolar protein degradation mechanisms. Experientia. 1992;48:158–172. doi: 10.1007/BF01923509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seglen PO, Gordon PB. 3-methyladenine: specific inhibitor of autophagic/lysosomal protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:1889–1892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.6.1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seglen PO, Gordon PB. Amino acid control of autophagic sequestration and protein degradation in isolated hepatocytes. J Cell Biol. 1984;99:435–444. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.2.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slot JW, Geuze HJ. A new method of preparing gold probes for multiple-labeling cytochemistry. Eur J Cell Biol. 1985;38:87–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talloczy Z, Jiang W, Virgin IV HW, Leib D, Scheuner D, Kaufman R, Eskelinen EL, Levine B. Regulation of starvation and virus-induced autophagy by the eIF2alpha kinase signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:190–195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012485299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka Y, et al. Accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and cardiomyopathy in LAMP-2-deficient mice. Nature. 2000;406:902–906. doi: 10.1038/35022595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waheed A, Gottschalk S, Hille A, Kreutler C, Pohlmann R, Braulke T, Hauser H, Geuze H, von Figura K. Human lysosomal acid phosphatase is transported as a transmembrane protein to lysosomes in transfected baby hamster kidney cells. EMBO J. 1988;7:2351–2358. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03079.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wenk J, Hille A, von Figura K. Quantitation of Mr 46000 and Mr 300000 mannose 6-phosphate receptors in human cells and tissues. Biochem Int. 1991;23:723–731. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams MA, McCluer RH. The use of Sep-Pak C18 cartridges during the isolation of gangliosides. J Neurochem. 1980;35:266–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1980.tb12515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto K, Katsuda N, Himeno M, Kato K. Cathepsin D of rat spleen: affinity purification and properties of two types of cathepsin D. Eur J Biochem. 1979;95:459–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb12985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]