Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Sep;111(12):1490–1497. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5940

A review of a two-phase population study of multiple chemical sensitivities.

Stanley M Caress 1, Anne C Steinemann 1
PMCID: PMC1241652  PMID: 12948889

Abstract

In this review we summarize the findings of a two-phase study of the prevalence, symptomatology, and etiology of multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). We also explore possible triggers, the potential linkage between MCS and other disorders, and the lifestyle alterations produced by MCS. The first phase of the study consisted of a random sampling of 1,582 individuals from the Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan area to determine the reported prevalence of a hypersensitivity to common chemicals. In this phase, 12.6% of the sample reported a hypersensitivity. Further questioning of individuals with a hypersensitivity indicated that 13.5% (1.8% of the entire sample) reported losing their jobs because of their hypersensitivity. The second phase was a follow-up questioning of the respondents who initially reported hypersensitivity. In this phase, we found that individuals with hypersensitivity experience a variety of symptoms and triggers. A significant percentage (27.5%) reported that their hypersensitivity was initiated by an exposure to pesticides, whereas an equal percentage (27.5%) attributed it to solvents. Only 1.4% had a history of prior emotional problems, but 37.7% developed these problems after the physical symptoms emerged. This suggests that MCS has a physiologic and not a psychologic etiology.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashford N. A. Low-level chemical sensitivity: implications for research and social policy. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Apr-Jun;15(3-4):421–427. doi: 10.1177/074823379901500317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell I. R., Hardin E. E., Baldwin C. M., Schwartz G. E. Increased limbic system symptomatology and sensitizability of young adults with chemical and noise sensitivities. Environ Res. 1995 Aug;70(2):84–97. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1995.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell I. R., Schwartz G. E., Peterson J. M., Amend D. Self-reported illness from chemical odors in young adults without clinical syndromes or occupational exposures. Arch Environ Health. 1993 Jan-Feb;48(1):6–13. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1993.9938387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Black D. W., Rathe A., Goldstein R. B. Environmental illness. A controlled study of 26 subjects with '20th century disease'. JAMA. 1990 Dec 26;264(24):3166–3170. doi: 10.1001/jama.264.24.3166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Byers V. S., Levin A. S., Ozonoff D. M., Baldwin R. W. Association between clinical symptoms and lymphocyte abnormalities in a population with chronic domestic exposure to industrial solvent-contaminated domestic water supply and a high incidence of leukaemia. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1988;27(1):77–81. doi: 10.1007/BF00205762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caress Stanley M., Steinemann Anne C., Waddick Caitlin. Symptomatology and etiology of multiple chemical sensitivities in the southeastern United States. Arch Environ Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;57(5):429–436. doi: 10.1080/00039890209601433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cullen M. R., Pace P. E., Redlich C. A. The experience of the Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Clinics with multiple chemical sensitivities, 1986-1991. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):15–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidoff A. L., Fogarty L., Keyl P. M. Psychiatric inferences from data on psychologic/psychiatric symptoms in multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome. Arch Environ Health. 2000 May-Jun;55(3):165–175. doi: 10.1080/00039890009603402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davidoff A. L., Fogarty L. Psychogenic origins of multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome: a critical review of the research literature. Arch Environ Health. 1994 Sep-Oct;49(5):316–325. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1994.9954981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellefson R. D., Ford R. E. The porphyrias [corrected]: characteristics and laboratory tests. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;24(1 Pt 2):S119–S125. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiedler N., Maccia C., Kipen H. Evaluation of chemically sensitive patients. J Occup Med. 1992 May;34(5):529–538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gots R. E. Multiple chemical sensitivities: distinguishing between psychogenic and toxicodynamic. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;24(1 Pt 2):S8–15. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kipen H. M., Hallman W., Kelly-McNeil K., Fiedler N. Measuring chemical sensitivity prevalence: a questionnaire for population studies. Am J Public Health. 1995 Apr;85(4):574–577. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.4.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kreutzer R., Neutra R. R., Lashuay N. Prevalence of people reporting sensitivities to chemicals in a population-based survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jul 1;150(1):1–12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lax M. B., Henneberger P. K. Patients with multiple chemical sensitivities in an occupational health clinic: presentation and follow-up. Arch Environ Health. 1995 Nov-Dec;50(6):425–431. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9935978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levin A. S., Byers V. S. Environmental illness: a disorder of immune regulation. Occup Med. 1987 Oct-Dec;2(4):669–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meggs W. J., Dunn K. A., Bloch R. M., Goodman P. E., Davidoff A. L. Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Arch Environ Health. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):275–282. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1996.9936026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meggs W. J. Multiple chemical sensitivities and the immune system. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):203–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller C. S., Mitzel H. C. Chemical sensitivity attributed to pesticide exposure versus remodeling. Arch Environ Health. 1995 Mar-Apr;50(2):119–129. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9940889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller C., Ashford N., Doty R., Lamielle M., Otto D., Rahill A., Wallace L. Empirical approaches for the investigation of toxicant-induced loss of tolerance. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Mar;105 (Suppl 2):515–519. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mooser S. B. The epidemiology of multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). Occup Med. 1987 Oct-Dec;2(4):663–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rea W. J., Bell I. R., Suits C. W., Smiley R. E. Food and chemical susceptibility after environmental chemical overexposure: case histories. Ann Allergy. 1978 Aug;41(2):101–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Siegel S., Kreutzer R. Pavlovian conditioning and multiple chemical sensitivity. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Mar;105 (Suppl 2):521–526. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s2521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ziem G. E. Multiple chemical sensitivity: treatment and followup with avoidance and control of chemical exposures. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):73–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES