Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Sep;111(12):1498–1504. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5936

Perceived treatment efficacy for conventional and alternative therapies reported by persons with multiple chemical sensitivity.

Pamela Reed Gibson 1, Amy Nicole-Marie Elms 1, Lisa Ann Ruding 1
PMCID: PMC1241653  PMID: 12948890

Abstract

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a condition in which persons experience negative health effects in multiple organ systems from exposure to low levels of common chemicals. Although symptoms experienced from particular chemicals vary across persons, they are generally stable within persons. The sensitivities often spread over time, first to related chemicals and then to other classes of chemicals. This study examined self-reported perceived treatment efficacy of 101 treatments used by 917 persons with self-reported MCS. Treatments examined included environmental medicine techniques, holistic therapies, individual nutritional supplements, detoxification techniques, body therapies, Eastern-origin techniques, newer therapies, prescription items, and others. The three most highly rated treatments were creating a chemical-free living space, chemical avoidance, and prayer. Both creating a chemical-free living space and chemical avoidance were rated by 95% of respondents as helpful. Results for most therapies were mixed. Participants had consulted a mean of 12 health care providers and spent over one-third of their annual income on health care costs. We discuss this drain on personal resources and describe respondents' attitudes toward the possibility of healing from MCS.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (174.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell I. R., Peterson J. M., Schwartz G. E. Medical histories and psychological profiles of middle-aged women with and without self-reported illness from environmental chemicals. J Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Apr;56(4):151–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Galland L. Biochemical abnormalities in patients with multiple chemical sensitivities. Occup Med. 1987 Oct-Dec;2(4):713–720. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jewett D. L. Diagnosis and treatment of hypersensitivity syndrome. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):111–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Joffres M. R., Williams T., Sabo B., Fox R. A. Environmental sensitivities: prevalence of major symptoms in a referral center: the Nova Scotia Environmental Sensitivities Research Center Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Feb;109(2):161–165. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lax M. B., Henneberger P. K. Patients with multiple chemical sensitivities in an occupational health clinic: presentation and follow-up. Arch Environ Health. 1995 Nov-Dec;50(6):425–431. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9935978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lieberman A. D., Craven M. R. Reactive Intestinal Dysfunction Syndrome (RIDS) caused by chemical exposures. Arch Environ Health. 1998 Sep-Oct;53(5):354–358. doi: 10.1080/00039899809605721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Meggs W. J., Dunn K. A., Bloch R. M., Goodman P. E., Davidoff A. L. Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Arch Environ Health. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):275–282. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1996.9936026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller C. S. Chemical sensitivity: symptom, syndrome or mechanism for disease? Toxicology. 1996 Jul 17;111(1-3):69–86. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03393-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Multiple chemical sensitivity: a 1999 consensus. Arch Environ Health. 1999 May-Jun;54(3):147–149. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ross G. H. History and clinical presentation of the chemically sensitive patient. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):21–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ziem G. E. Multiple chemical sensitivity: treatment and followup with avoidance and control of chemical exposures. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):73–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES