Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Sep;111(12):1530–1549. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5780

The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies.

Jun Kanno 1, Lesley Onyon 1, Shyamal Peddada 1, John Ashby 1, Elard Jacob 1, William Owens 1
PMCID: PMC1241659  PMID: 12948896

Abstract

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has completed phase 2 of an international validation program for the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. The purpose of the validation program was to demonstrate the performance of two versions of the uterotrophic bioassay, the immature female rat and the adult ovariectomized rat, in four standardized protocols. This article reports the dose-response studies of the validation program; the coded single-dose studies are reported in an accompanying paper. The dose-response study design used five selected weak estrogen agonists, bisphenol A, genistein, methoxychlor, nonylphenol, and o,p -DDT. These weak agonists were administered in a prescribed series of doses to measure the performance and reproducibility of the protocols among the participating laboratories. All protocols successfully detected increases in uterine weights when the weak agonists were administered. Within each protocol, there was good agreement and reproducibility of the dose response among laboratories with each substance. Substance-specific variations were observed in the influence of the route of administration on the uterine response, the potency as related to the dose producing the first statistically significant increase in uterine weights, and the maximum increase in uterine weight. Substantive performance differences were not observed between the uterotrophic bioassay versions or among the standardized protocols, and these were judged to be qualitatively equivalent. It is noteworthy that these results were reproducible under a variety of different experimental conditions (e.g., animal strain, diet, housing, bedding, vehicle, animal age), indicating that the bioassay's performance as a screen is robust. In conclusion, both the intact, immature, and adult OVX versions, and all protocols appear to be reproducible and transferable across laboratories and are able to detect weak estrogen agonists.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (225.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blair R. M., Fang H., Branham W. S., Hass B. S., Dial S. L., Moland C. L., Tong W., Shi L., Perkins R., Sheehan D. M. The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. Toxicol Sci. 2000 Mar;54(1):138–153. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/54.1.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branham William S., Dial Stacey L., Moland Carrie L., Hass Bruce S., Blair Robert M., Fang Hong, Shi Leming, Tong Weida, Perkins Roger G., Sheehan Daniel M. Phytoestrogens and mycoestrogens bind to the rat uterine estrogen receptor. J Nutr. 2002 Apr;132(4):658–664. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.4.658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulger W. H., Muccitelli R. M., Kupfer D. Studies on the in vivo and in vitro estrogenic activities of methoxychlor and its metabolites. Role of hepatic mono-oxygenase in methoxychlor activation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1978;27(20):2417–2423. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(78)90354-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Casanova M., You L., Gaido K. W., Archibeque-Engle S., Janszen D. B., Heck H. A. Developmental effects of dietary phytoestrogens in Sprague-Dawley rats and interactions of genistein and daidzein with rat estrogen receptors alpha and beta in vitro. Toxicol Sci. 1999 Oct;51(2):236–244. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/51.2.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang H. C., Churchwell M. I., Delclos K. B., Newbold R. R., Doerge D. R. Mass spectrometric determination of Genistein tissue distribution in diet-exposed Sprague-Dawley rats. J Nutr. 2000 Aug;130(8):1963–1970. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.8.1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chapin R. E., Delaney J., Wang Y., Lanning L., Davis B., Collins B., Mintz N., Wolfe G. The effects of 4-nonylphenol in rats: a multigeneration reproduction study. Toxicol Sci. 1999 Nov;52(1):80–91. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/52.1.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapin R. E., Harris M. W., Davis B. J., Ward S. M., Wilson R. E., Mauney M. A., Lockhart A. C., Smialowicz R. J., Moser V. C., Burka L. T. The effects of perinatal/juvenile methoxychlor exposure on adult rat nervous, immune, and reproductive system function. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997 Nov;40(1):138–157. doi: 10.1006/faat.1997.2381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coldham N. G., Sauer M. J. Pharmacokinetics of [(14)C]Genistein in the rat: gender-related differences, potential mechanisms of biological action, and implications for human health. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000 Apr 15;164(2):206–215. doi: 10.1006/taap.2000.8902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ema M., Fujii S., Furukawa M., Kiguchi M., Ikka T., Harazono A. Rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study of bisphenol A. Reprod Toxicol. 2001 Sep-Oct;15(5):505–523. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(01)00160-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kanno J., Onyon L., Haseman J., Fenner-Crisp P., Ashby J., Owens W., Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Aug;109(8):785–794. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kanno Jun, Onyon Lesley, Peddada Shyamal, Ashby John, Jacob Elard, Owens William. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: coded single-dose studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1550–1558. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nagao T., Wada K., Marumo H., Yoshimura S., Ono H. Reproductive effects of nonylphenol in rats after gavage administration: a two-generation study. Reprod Toxicol. 2001 May-Jun;15(3):293–315. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(01)00123-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Newbold R. R., Banks E. P., Bullock B., Jefferson W. N. Uterine adenocarcinoma in mice treated neonatally with genistein. Cancer Res. 2001 Jun 1;61(11):4325–4328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Owens William, Ashby John, Odum Jenny, Onyon Lesley. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dietary phytoestrogen analyses. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1559–1567. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pottenger L. H., Domoradzki J. Y., Markham D. A., Hansen S. C., Cagen S. Z., Waechter J. M., Jr The relative bioavailability and metabolism of bisphenol A in rats is dependent upon the route of administration. Toxicol Sci. 2000 Mar;54(1):3–18. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/54.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tyl R. W., Myers C. B., Marr M. C., Thomas B. F., Keimowitz A. R., Brine D. R., Veselica M. M., Fail P. A., Chang T. Y., Seely J. C. Three-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in CD Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Sci. 2002 Jul;68(1):121–146. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/68.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES