Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Nov;111(14):1786–1788. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6778

Ethical issues in environmental health research.

Richard R Sharp 1
PMCID: PMC1241725  PMID: 14594633

Abstract

Environmental health research encompasses a wide range of investigational topics, study designs, and empirical methodologies. As that arm of public health research concerned with understanding the health effects of the many environments in which humans live and work, the field is intimately connected with social concerns about environmental quality and disparities of power and privilege that place differential burdens upon members of underserved communities. Environmental health researchers thus engage many ethical and social issues in the work they do. These issues relate to the choice of research topics to study, the methods employed to examine these topics, the communication of research findings to the public, and the involvement of scientific experts in the shaping of environmental policy and governmental regulation. These and other topics are reviewed in this article. These ethical, legal, and social issues are becoming increasingly more complex as new genetic and molecular techniques are used to study environmental toxicants and their potential influence on human and ecologic health.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Au W. W., Oh H. Y., Grady J., Salama S. A., Heo M. Y. Usefulness of genetic susceptibility and biomarkers for evaluation of environmental health risk. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2001;37(3):215–225. doi: 10.1002/em.1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes D. E., Bero L. A. Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 1997 Spring;6(1):19–26. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown Phil. Qualitative methods in environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Nov;111(14):1789–1798. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bullard R. D., Wright B. H. Environmental justice for all: community perspectives on health and research needs. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;9(5):821–841. doi: 10.1177/074823379300900508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke Wylie, Atkins David, Gwinn Marta, Guttmacher Alan, Haddow James, Lau Joseph, Palomaki Glenn, Press Nancy, Richards C. Sue, Wideroff Louise. Genetic test evaluation: information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Aug 15;156(4):311–318. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns J., Jr Absence of certainty is not synonymous with absence of risk. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Feb;107(2):A56–A57. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107a56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Callahan Daniel, Jennings Bruce. Ethics and public health: forging a strong relationship. Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):169–176. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpenter D. O. Communicating with the public on issues of science and public health. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 (Suppl 6):127–130. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Christiani D. C., Sharp R. R., Collman G. W., Suk W. A. Applying genomic technologies in environmental health research: challenges and opportunities. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jun;43(6):526–533. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200106000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornwall A., Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995 Dec;41(12):1667–1676. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coughlin S. S. Ethics in epidemiology at the end of the 20th century: ethics, values, and mission statements. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(1):169–175. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a018016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deck W., Kosatsky T. Communicating their individual results to participants in an environmental exposure study: insights from clinical ethics. Environ Res. 1999 Feb;80(2 Pt 2):S223–S229. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frank A. L. Ethical and practical aspects of human studies. Mutat Res. 2001 Sep 1;480-481:333–336. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00192-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hainaut P., Vähäkangas K. Genetic analysis of metabolic polymorphisms in molecular epidemiological studies: social and ethical implications. IARC Sci Publ. 1999;(148):395–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Henry Carol J., Phillips Richard, Carpanini Francis, Corton J. Christopher, Craig Katherine, Igarashi Koichi, Leboeuf Robert, Marchant Gary, Osborn Kimberly, Pennie William D. Use of genomics in toxicology and epidemiology: findings and recommendations of a workshop. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Oct;110(10):1047–1050. doi: 10.1289/ehp.021101047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kass N. E. An ethics framework for public health. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1776–1782. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lavery J. V., Upshur R. E. G., Sharp R. R., Hofman K. J. Ethical issues in international environmental health research. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003 Aug;206(4-5):453–463. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loeb J. M., Hendee W. R., Smith S. J., Schwartz M. R. Human vs animal rights. In defense of animal research. JAMA. 1989 Nov 17;262(19):2716–2720. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. MacQueen K. M., McLellan E., Metzger D. S., Kegeles S., Strauss R. P., Scotti R., Blanchard L., Trotter R. T., 2nd What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1929–1938. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Marchant Gary E. From general policy to legal rule: aspirations and limitations of the precautionary principle. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Nov;111(14):1799–1803. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rollin Bernard E. Toxicology and new social ethics for animals. Toxicol Pathol. 2003 Jan-Feb;31 (Suppl):128–131. doi: 10.1080/01926230390175011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schulte P. A., Hunter D., Rothman N. Ethical and social issues in the use of biomarkers in epidemiological research. IARC Sci Publ. 1997;(142):313–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schulte P. A., Lomax G. P., Ward E. M., Colligan M. J. Ethical issues in the use of genetic markers in occupational epidemiologic research. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Aug;41(8):639–646. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199908000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sexton K., Olden K., Johnson B. L. "Environmental justice": the central role of research in establishing a credible scientific foundation for informed decision making. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;9(5):685–727. doi: 10.1177/074823379300900504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharp R. R., Barrett J. C. The environmental genome project: ethical, legal, and social implications. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Apr;108(4):279–281. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Strauss R. P., Sengupta S., Quinn S. C., Goeppinger J., Spaulding C., Kegeles S. M., Millett G. The role of community advisory boards: involving communities in the informed consent process. Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1938–1943. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Damme K., Casteleyn L., Heseltine E., Huici A., Sorsa M., van Larebeke N., Vineis P. Individual susceptibility and prevention of occupational diseases: scientific and ethical issues. J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Jan;37(1):91–99. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199501000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vineis P. Environmental risks: scientific concepts and social perception. Theor Med. 1995 Jun;16(2):153–169. doi: 10.1007/BF00998542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vineis P., Schulte P. A. Scientific and ethical aspects of genetic screening of workers for cancer risk: the case of the N-acetyltransferase phenotype. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;48(2):189–197. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00131-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vineis P., Soskolne C. L. Cancer risk assessment and management. An ethical perspective. J Occup Med. 1993 Sep;35(9):902–908. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199309000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weed D. L. Science, ethics guidelines, and advocacy in epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol. 1994 Mar;4(2):166–171. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90064-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weed Douglas L., McKeown Robert E. Science and social responsibility in public health. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Nov;111(14):1804–1808. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weed Douglas L., Mink Pamela J. Roles and responsibilities of epidemiologists. Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;12(2):67–72. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00302-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wing S. Whose epidemiology, whose health? Int J Health Serv. 1998;28(2):241–252. doi: 10.2190/Y3GE-NQCK-0LNR-T126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wing Steve. Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Nov;111(14):1809–1818. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES