Abstract
Public health researchers increasingly turn to qualitative methods either on their own or in combination with quantitative methods. Qualitative methods are especially important to community environmental health research, as they provide a way to produce community narratives that give voice to individuals and characterize the community in a full and complex fashion. This article first traces the legacy of qualitative research in environmental health, then uses a case study of the author's experiences studying the Woburn, Massachusetts, childhood leukemia cluster to provide personal and scholarly insights on qualitative approaches. That material then informs a discussion of important components of qualitative methods in environmental health research, including flexible study design, access, trust, empathy, and personal shifts in the researcher's worldview, bias, and the nature of the researcher's roles. A concluding discussion addresses issues in funding policy and research practices.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Greenberg M., Wartenberg D. Communicating to an alarmed community about cancer clusters: a fifty state survey. J Community Health. 1991 Apr;16(2):71–82. doi: 10.1007/BF01341716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quigley D., Handy D., Goble R., Sanchez V., George P. Participatory research strategies in nuclear risk management for native communities. J Health Commun. 2000 Oct-Dec;5(4):305–331. doi: 10.1080/10810730050199123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams G. The genesis of chronic illness: narrative re-construction. Sociol Health Illn. 1984 Jul;6(2):175–200. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10778250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]