Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Nov;111(14):1799–1803. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6197

From general policy to legal rule: aspirations and limitations of the precautionary principle.

Gary E Marchant 1
PMCID: PMC1241727  PMID: 14594635

Abstract

The rapid spread of the precautionary principle (PP) demonstrates the need to explicitly address the role of precaution in environmental decision making. Unfortunately, the PP in its current form is limited by the vagueness of, and variations in, the many formulations of the PP. This ambiguity in the meaning of the PP would not be so serious if the PP were limited to a general aspirational policy, but in every jurisdiction that has adopted the PP it has been transformed rapidly into a binding legal rule. As a legal rule, the ambiguity of the PP results in arbitrary application by regulatory agencies and reviewing courts and limits the capability of reviewing courts to perform their function in overseeing agency actions. To improve the explicit application of precaution, we must go beyond the current form of the PP and attempt to define the factors that weigh in favor of more or less precaution for specific risks.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (112.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bohannon John. Food aid. Zambia rejects GM corn on scientists' advice. Science. 2002 Nov 8;298(5596):1153–1154. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5596.1153a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldstein B. D. The precautionary principle and scientific research are not antithetical. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Dec;107(12):A594–A595. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107a594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hansson S. O. Can we reverse the burden of proof? Toxicol Lett. 1997 Feb 7;90(2-3):223–228. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(96)03851-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoffmann-Riem Holger, Wynne Brian. In risk assessment, one has to admit ignorance. Nature. 2002 Mar 14;416(6877):123–123. doi: 10.1038/416123a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leblanc Jean-Charles, Malmauret Laure, Delobel David, Verger Philippe. Simulation of the exposure to deoxynivalenol of French consumers of organic and conventional foodstuffs. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Oct;36(2):149–154. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2002.1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Madsen Kreesten Meldgaard, Hviid Anders, Vestergaard Mogens, Schendel Diana, Wohlfahrt Jan, Thorsen Poul, Olsen Jørn, Melbye Mads. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 7;347(19):1477–1482. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Trewavas A. Urban myths of organic farming. Nature. 2001 Mar 22;410(6827):409–410. doi: 10.1038/35068639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES