Abstract
Key message
Genome doubling did not enhance drought tolerance in alfalfa, but may set the stage for long-term adaptation to drought through a novel transcriptional landscape.
Abstract
Whole genome duplication (WGD) has been shown to enhance stress tolerance in plants. Cultivated alfalfa is autotetraploid, but diploid wild relatives are important sources of genetic variation for breeding. Investigating how WGD affects gene expression in stress conditions could provide better understanding for use of diploid genetic resources. In this work, we compared the drought response of neotetraploid plants obtained by bilateral sexual polyploidization with diploid full sibs, by measuring physiological and biochemical traits and RNA-seq. Without drought, 4x plants had lower photosynthetic potential than 2x plants per unit leaf area, but larger leaves allowed them to outperform the per leaf photosynthetic potential of 2x plants. Physiological and biochemical traits were significantly affected by drought in both 2x and 4x plants, but the differences between ploidies were small and nonsignificant. Proline levels were higher in 4x than 2x plants, both in control and drought conditions, indicating that larger cells with higher volume-to-surface ratio of 4x plants require a higher osmolyte concentration. RNA-seq and gene network analyses showed that more genes were affected by drought at 4x than at 2x level, with downregulation of hundreds of genes involved in photosynthesis and stomatal movement at 4x level, suggesting that WGD made the 4x plants more responsive to drought. Genes involved in proline, phytormone and cell wall functions were also transcriptionally affected by drought in 4x plants. We conclude that WGD did not immediately enhance drought tolerance in alfalfa, but may set the stage for long-term adaptation to drought through a novel transcriptional landscape.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00299-025-03593-9.
Keywords: Gene co-expression network, Medicago sativa, Photosynthesis, RNA-Seq, Sexual polyploidization, Water deficit, WGCNA
Introduction
Polyploidy, defined as the presence of more than two sets of homologous chromosomes in a nucleus, represents a major driving force of genome evolution and speciation in angiosperms (Wood et al. 2009; Madlung 2013; Van De Peer et al. 2017). Research has shown that polyploidy has played a crucial role in the domestication of many crop species by enhancing their genetic diversity and adaptability (Salman-Minkov et al. 2016). Polyploid organisms arise through whole-genome duplication (WGD) within a species (autopolyploidy) or involving hybridisation between related species (allopolyploidy). WGD often involves structural genome changes (Fawcett et al. 2009; De Storme and Mason 2014; Vanneste et al. 2014), that can result in unique physiological and morphological characteristics not found in the diploid progenitors (Heslop-Harrison et al. 2023). Polyploidization increases cell size, leading to a complex network of interactions within the cell, from chromatin structure and gene regulation to the function of organelles and the movement of molecules (Doyle and Coate 2019; Soltis and Soltis 2012).
Polyploidy has often been shown to enhance tolerance to stress conditions such as drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures through mechanisms such as genome buffering, increased gene expression flexibility, and epigenetic modifications (Van de Peer et al. 2021; Tossi et al. 2022). This adaptability is thought to provide an evolutionary advantage during shifting environmental conditions, as seen in the increased endopolyploidy in plant tissues experiencing stress, enabling resilience and recovery through cellular redundancy and genomic plasticity (Morris et al. 2024).
Drought is a major challenge for global agriculture, with severe adverse effects on global crop productivity, exacerbated by climate change (Dai 2013; Touma et al. 2015; Schwalm et al. 2017). While the definition of drought is a matter of debate (Tardieu et al. 2018), in the context of agriculture, one component of drought is water deficit, defined as available water not meeting plant evapotranspiration needs.
Polyploids have shown enhanced tolerance to drought compared to their diploid counterparts through larger cell sizes, modified root-to-shoot ratios, and improved water-use efficiency (Maherali et al. 2009; Tossi et al. 2022). This tolerance is partially attributed to larger xylem vessels having increased hydraulic conductivity, enhanced antioxidant capacity to combat oxidative stress, better regulation of osmolyte content and pre-activated abscisic acid (ABA) responses (Del Pozo and Ramirez-Parra 2014; Yang et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2015; Ruiz et al. 2020).
Despite the widespread occurrence of polyploids under drought conditions (Te Beest et al. 2012; Hao et al. 2013; Folk et al. 2020; Van de Peer et al. 2021; Tossi et al. 2022), there are still gaps in our understanding of polyploidy advantage at the physiological, molecular and particularly the gene expression levels. With the advancement of sequencing technologies, it is becoming feasible to further our understanding of how polyploids truly differ from their diploid progenitors. One specific tool for this study is RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), which allows for detailed studies across many plant species and transcriptomic insight into the functionality of polyploid genomes.
Cultivated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L., 2n = 4x = 32) is one of the most widespread perennial forage legumes globally, valued for its nutrient-rich feed and versatility for hay, pasture, and silage production across a wide range of environmental conditions. While comparatively alfalfa is generally considered a drought tolerant plant, thanks to its deep root system (Abdul-Jabbar et al. 1982), prolonged and severe drought leads to loss of yield and undesirable forage quality (Carter and Sheaffer 1983; Peterson et al. 1992). Sustaining and increasing production under drought is currently a major focus of many alfalfa breeding programs. Many traits associated with drought tolerance have been and are continually being investigated (Singer et al. 2018; Diatta et al. 2021; Kang et al. 2023; Zhou et al. 2024). Alfalfa varieties considered drought tolerant have been identified with increased accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) as well as other antioxidants, which is in line with studies in soybean, wheat, and maize (Zhang et al. 2019). Efforts are currently being made to characterize diverse wild relatives, both diploid and polyploid, within the M. sativa complex to identify sources of drought-tolerance germplasm for breeding programs (Ray et al. 2015; Humphries et al. 2021).
In this work, we have investigated the effects of WGD on drought tolerance in alfalfa, by comparing physiological traits and transcriptomes of full-sib diploid and neotetraploid plants. We found that, although the phenotypic differences between diploids and tetraploids were limited, WGD resulted in a distinctive transcriptional response to drought. We identified genes, pathways and hubs that could provide a polyploid advantage and can be targets of breeding programs for improved yields under drought.
Materials and methods
Plant material and experimental conditions
The plants used in this work were previously described by (Rosellini et al. 2016), and consisted of three diploid, S8, S16 and S24, and three tetraploid, S29, S48 and S60, genotypes obtained through bilateral sexual polyploidization from crossing two diploid meiotic mutants, PG-F9 and 12P, (Tavoletti 1994; Barcaccia et al. 1997; Tavoletti et al. 1991). The genotypes have been maintained at the Department of Agricultural Food and Environmental Sciences of the University of Perugia through yearly cloning by stem cuttings. The study was conducted in a climate-controlled growth chamber at 23 ± 1 °C and 80% humidity with light levels of 324 µmol m−2 s−1 provided by fluorescent tubes and halogen bulbs, with 16/8 photoperiod. The pots were arranged in a randomized block design, containing soil, sand and peat moss at a ratio of 2:1:1 with five blocks, each containing three rows (control, stress and recovery). During the 2-week acclimatization period, irrigation was provided to meet evapotranspiration need with tap water.
Stress treatment
To initiate the study, all plants were irrigated to field capacity and assigned one of two watering regimes: well-watered and not watered (drought). To identify the soil water content at which stress signs became evident, a preliminary trial was conducted with one plant per genotype. Soil volumetric water content was checked daily in the two conditions using a Terrasense device (Netsens), which uses frequency domain reflectometry to determine the dielectric constant. The average of three measurements per pot was used as the daily water content value. Pots were also weighed throughout the preliminary experiment to verify device accuracy. Wilting of shoot tips (Fig. 1) was observed in all genotypes below 10% soil water content. A stress threshold of 9.5% ± 0.2% was chosen for drought stress measurements. Three water regimes were applied. Control plants were watered every 2–3 days to maintain optimal water status. Drought treatment was applied by suspending irrigation until the threshold soil water content was reached, and data were collected. Severe drought treatment was applied by allowing plants to wilt severely to complete loss of leaf turgidity before being re-watered to visually assess their recovery after 48 h. No physiological or biochemical data were collected on the latter group of plants.
Fig. 1.

Phenotype of diploid S16 (A, B) and tetraploid S60 (C, D) genotypes under control (A, C) and drought conditions (9.5% soil water content, B, D)
Physiological parameters
Gas-exchange-based data were collected using a Li-Cor 6400 instrument equipped with a 3 × 2 cm chamber: photosynthetic rate (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (mol H2O m−2 s−1), transpiration rate (mmol H2O m−2 s−1), and intercellular CO2 concentration (µmol CO2 mol−1), for one measurement per trifoliate. Parameters were set at: Lux = 1000 (Units), reference CO2 = 400, flow = 500. Three young fully expanded leaves per plant were individually placed in the chamber for 1 min immediately after removal from the plant. Chlorophyll content was estimated using a SPAD device (Minolta) twice on each trifoliate leaf. Data were collected at 2 time points in this study. Baseline data was collected after both control and treated plants were watered to saturation and allowed to acclimate (no stress/ day zero). Stress time point data were collected from stressed and control plants when stressed plants reached the soil water content threshold defined above.
Sample Collection
Multiple young fully expanded non-senescing trifoliate leaves were harvested at stress time point from each alfalfa plant, immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C until further processing. A total of thirty-six leaf samples (6 genotypes × 2 treatments × 3 biological replicates) were used in the following molecular techniques.
Biochemical characterization
Proline content was determined according to (Carillo and Gibon 2011). For this study, 50 mg of flash-frozen leaf tissue was homogenized in liquid nitrogen and extracted with 40% ethanol. A volume of 125 µL of the extract was mixed with 1 mL of the reaction mix containing 1% (w/v) ninhydrin solubilized in 60% (v/v) acetic acid and 20% (v/v) ethanol. The mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 20 min in the dark and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 1 min at room temperature in a table microfuge. The absorbance of the supernatant was then measured at 520 nm. Quantification was performed using an external calibration curve prepared using proline solutions at concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 5 mmol. Lipid peroxidation was measured using a modified thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method (Dhindsa et al. 1981). Fifty mg of flash-frozen leaf tissue was homogenized in 1 ml 0.1% (w/v) TCA solution. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and 0.5 ml of the supernatant was added to 1 ml 0.5% (w/v) TBA in 20% TCA. The mixture was incubated in a 95 °C water bath for 30 min, and the reaction stopped by placing the reaction tubes in an ice bath. Then the samples were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was read at 532 nm. The value for non-specific absorption at 600 nm was subtracted. The amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) was calculated using its extinction coefficient of 155 mM−1 cm−1.
RNA extraction
Total RNA was isolated from 60 mg of ground flash-frozen tissue using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) with degradation and contamination evaluated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Purity and concentration were checked using the NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA quantity was determined with a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer using the Qubit® RNA BR assay kit (Invitrogen™). Integrity was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Samples with 260/280 and 260/230 ratios ranging from 1.8 to 2.2 were used for sequencing. The quality was assessed by the RNA integrity number measurement. Our average of 6.6 indicated samples were suitable for sequencing.
Library preparation for RNA-seq
The transcriptome sequencing was conducted by Novogene (Cambridge, UK). Libraries were generated on the Illumina Hiseq2500 (150 bp paired-end reads; 6 G) using the NGS RNA Library Prep Set (Novogene Biotech, PT044). Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform to generate paired-end 2 × 150 bp reads. Raw reads were first processed through in-house Perl scripts to remove reads containing adapters or poly-N, and low-quality reads. Q20, Q30, GC content and sequence duplication levels of the clean data were calculated. All the downstream analyses were based on high-quality clean data (Supplementary Table S1).
De novo assembly for alfalfa leaf transcriptome reconstruction and gene function annotation
De novo transcriptome assembly was performed using Trinity (2.6.6 version) with min_Kmer_Cov = 3 and min_glue = 4 (Grabherr et al. 2011). Corset (1.09 version,—m 10)was used to hierarchically groups transcripts by sequence similarity and expression (Davidson and Oshlack 2014). The longest transcript from each cluster was then designated as a unigene, which refers to a single representative transcript per gene locus, encompassing all associated isoforms and transcript variants. Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO software, 3.0.2 version) was used for assembly assessment and gene prediction (Simão et al. 2015). Unigene functional annotations were obtained through: National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), non-redundant protein sequences (Nr, Diamond software, 2.1.6 version, e-value threshold 1e−5) (Buchfink et al. 2014), NCBI non-redundant nucleotide sequences (Nt, NCBI blast software, 2.9.0 version, e-value threshold 1e−5), Protein family (Pfam, hmmscan software, HMMER 3.1 version, e-value threshold 0.01) (Finn et al. 2011), Cluster of Orthologous Groups of Proteins (KOG/ COG, Diamond software, 2.1.6 version, e-value threshold 1e−5) (Buchfink et al. 2014), Swiss-Prot (Diamond software, 2.1.6 version, e-value threshold 1e−5), Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG, Diamond and KAAS software, 2.1.6 version, e-value threshold 1e−5) (Buchfink et al. 2014; Moriya et al. 2007) and GO (blast2GO software, b2g4pipe_ v2.5 version, e-value threshold 1e−6) (Götz et al. 2008). The M. sativa transcriptome was published in NCBI-SRA (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/) with BioProject accession number (PRJNA1219831).
Quantification of gene expression and differential expression analysis
Gene expression levels were estimated using RSEM (1.2.28 version) to map reads to the assembled transcriptome and counts obtained from these maps. Read counts were used for DESeq2 (1.26.0 version), to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Love et al. 2014). Resulting P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach for controlling false discovery rate. Differentially expressed genes had an absolute log2 FC ≥ 1 and an adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05. To identify DEGs under drought four comparisons were made: diploids versus tetraploids in control conditions (2x_C vs. 4x_C), diploids versus tetraploids under drought (2x_T vs. 4x_T), diploids under drought versus diploids in control conditions (2x_T vs. 2x_C), and tetraploids under drought versus tetraploids in control conditions (4x_T vs. 4x_C) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Venn diagram of significantly enriched DEGs under drought. Upward green arrows indicate significantly up-regulated genes, while downward red arrows indicate significantly down-regulated genes. Here, up-regulation corresponds to higher expression in the 2x compared to the 4x plants, that is, lower expression in the 4x plants
Validation of candidate DEGs using RT-qPCR analysis
To validate RNA-seq results, 14 DEGs of the 2x_T versus 4x_T group were analyzed with qRT-PCR (Supplementary Table S2). RNA (2.0 µg) was reverse transcribed using Maxima™ H Minus cDNA Synthesis Master Mix with dsDNase (Thermo Fischer Scientific). qRT-PCR was carried out with PowerUp SYBR Green Master mix (Thermo Fischer Scientific), using primers listed in Supplementary Table S2. The validation subset was normalized with the 18S rRNA reference gene, and fold change was calculated by the 2−∆∆CT method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). The 2−∆∆CT levels in stressed and non-stressed samples of single genotypes were estimated and correlated with the corresponding log2 FC obtained from RNA-seq.
Gene ontology, KEGG enrichment and iTAK analysis
We conducted Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis of DEGs with ShinyGO V0.80 (Ge et al. 2018). All DEGs were submitted to KOBAS (version 3.0, corrected P-value ≤ 0.05) to identify significantly enriched pathways in the KEGG database (Bu et al. 2021), choosing M. truncatula as the reference species. Gene functional enrichment was conducted using MapMan 3.6.0RC1 (https://mapman.gabipd.org/) (Thimm et al. 2004). DEGs were mapped using Mercator4 (7.0 version) (Lohse et al. 2014) to classify and predict functions and resulting maps analyzed with MapMan. Significant DEGs (padj ≤ 0.05) and their respective log2 fold change values were used for alignment with the Mercator map. iTAK was used to identify the transcription factor (TF) families among DEGs (Zheng et al. 2016). An adjusted P-value cutoff of 0.05 and an absolute Log2FC threshold of 1 were used to filter the significantly up- and down-regulated genes.
Building gene co-expression networks
Co-expression network analysis identified gene clusters (modules) with highly correlated expression profiles (hub genes) using the Weighted Correlation Network analysis (WGCNA) package in R (Langfelder and Horvath 2008). The read counts matrix was filtered by retaining genes with more than 20 alignments in at least 3 samples. Data were normalized using DESeq2 median of ratios method (Love et al. 2014), setting ploidy and treatment as linear model variables. Scale-free topological analysis using the pickSoftThreshold function of WGCNA chose the proper soft-thresholding power (Langfelder and Horvath 2008). We selected the value closest to 0.9 to ensure a scale-free co-expression network when the soft threshold ranged from 1 to 20. A weighted adjacency matrix was constructed on the normalized data using automatic module detection function blockwiseModules of WGCNA (Langfelder and Horvath 2008) with the following parameters: net_type = signed, minModuleSize = 30, mergeCutHeight = 0.25, deepSplit = 2, corType = Pearson, randomSeed = 42, power = 28. Identified modules were corrected using a k-means clustering analysis with the applyKMeans function of CoExpNets (Botía et al. 2017). We used module eigengenes and gene significance to retrieve modules associated with specific ploidy-dependent experimental conditions.
SWItch Miner (SWIM) integrated network analysis was used to further screen significant hub genes (Paci et al. 2017) with an unweighted correlation network to identify master regulators associated with changes in the transcriptome. SWIM-based correlation network analysis was applied to predict genes affected by ploidy. An adjusted P-value cutoff of 0.05 and a log2fold change (log2FC) threshold of ± 1 were used to search for significant nodes based on Pearson correlation.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using R-studio software (4.2.2 version). Two models, one linear and one linear mixed effect, were constructed. The sources of variation used in these models were: Genotype, Ploidy, Treatment, and Block. The term Genotype was nested within Ploidy, so different models were used to determine effects due to genotype or ploidy. Models included relevant interaction term Ploidy/Genotype x Treatment as a fixed effect. Block x Treatment was used as a fixed effect in linear models for validation and a random effect in linear mixed models for data analysis. All data and models were tested for normality and outlying data were removed as needed. Box plots were constructed to visualize the data. The measurements from the 3 leaves (technical replicates) were averaged to form one biological replicate (plant). The collected data were first processed using the randomized models for ANOVA analysis using R Studio. Pairwise analysis using EEMEANS was used to further explore interactions between ploidy and genotypes.
Results
Effect of drought and WGD on physiological and biochemical parameters
Overall, drought significantly affected most physiological parameters (Fig. 2): lower photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration were observed in both 2x and 4x plants. A strong increase in proline concentration was measured, while malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration was marginally increased in 4x plants only (Supplementary Table S3A, B; Supplementary Figs. S1–S8). Chlorophyll content was marginally higher in stressed plants, although not significantly (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. S1–S8).
Fig. 2.
Physiological traits of 2x and 4x plants under control and drought conditions. *, ***, difference between stress and control significant at the P ≤ 0.05 or 0.001 level, according to the F test; n.s., not significant. The significance of differences between 2x and 4x plants is reported below each bar chart. No instances of significant Ploidy x Stress interactions were found. LRWC, leaf relative water content; MDA, malondialdehyde
Ploidy did statistically impact some physiological traits under both control and stress conditions (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table S3B, Supplementary Fig. S1–S8): photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and leaf relative water content were lower in 4x compared to 2x plants, whereas proline concentration and chlorophyll content (SPAD) were higher in 4x plants (Supplementary Table S3A, B). No significance was observed in the Stress × Ploidy interaction for any trait.
Transcriptome assembly
After RNA-Seq and clean-up, a total of 850 million clean reads (Supplementary Table S1), representing 98.72% of the total reads, were obtained. Downstream analysis on roughly 23 million reads (7.09 Gb per sample), with high proportions of Q30 (95.03%) and GC content (42.07%) (Supplementary Table S1) and a relatively high K-mer coverage for de novo transcriptome assembly (min-kmer_cov = 5) yielded 246,789 transcripts with an N50 of 1944 bp and 91,141 unigenes with N50 of 1721 bp (Supplementary Table S1, Fig. S9A). Filtered unique reads were mapped to the reconstructed transcriptome with an average read mapping rate of 71.40%. The quality and completeness of our transcriptome assessed using the BUSCO tool (3.0.2 version) was comparable or higher than those reported for a de novo assembly (Simão et al. 2015; Wong et al. 2025). Among the 1440 searched BUSCO groups, in the whole transcriptome dataset, 87.5% complete transcripts, (27.78% single and 59.72% duplicated) were obtained (Figure S9B). In the non-redundant transcripts and the unigenes datasets, BUSCO values were 65.63% complete (63.99% single, 2.64% duplicated). Functional annotation of the unigenes with BLAST searches against public databases resulted in a total of 84,563 unigenes (92.78%) annotated in at least one database (Fig. S10).
Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)
The number of genes whose expression levels changed between the experimental treatments are reported in Fig. 3. A majority of DEGs were downregulated by stress in both 4x plants (835/1320 = 64%) and 2x plants (547/901 = 63%), but the number of drought-affected genes was 46% higher in 4x plants (1320 vs. 901; Fig. 3; Supplementary Table S3). Considering the 2x_T versus 4x_T comparison, we found that 73% of DEGs (1365/1866) were upregulated in 4x with respect to 2x plants, the same percentage that exhibited upregulation in 4x versus 2x plants in control conditions (2x_C vs. 4x_C comparison: 1568/2019 = 73%). Therefore, the polyploid condition mostly brought about transcriptional upregulation irrespective of stress.
A total of 308 genes (116 up- and 192 down-regulated) were unique to the 2x_T versus 2x_C group (drought-sensitive in 2x plants, blue circle in Fig. 3), while 716 genes (242 up- and 474 down-regulated) were unique to the 4x_T versus 4x_C group (drought-sensitive in 4x plants, pink circle), indicating that polyploids responded to drought stress with a larger transcriptional modulation. We considered these 716 DEGs as candidates for being associated with ploidy-specific responses to drought.
The validation of expression levels for 14 selected DEGs was carried out by qRT-PCR. The results showed high congruence between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR data (correlation coefficient r = 0.91, Fig. S11), confirming the high reliability of RNA-Seq.
Functional analysis of DEGs involved in drought response
Ploidy-specific transcriptional differences in response to drought were further investigated through an enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Drought had different transcriptional consequences at 2x and 4x ploidies.
At the 4x level, the enriched GO terms unique to the group of 716 drought-affected DEGs (from the 4x_T vs. 4x_C comparison) were overwhelmingly related to plastid, organelle envelope, photosynthesis, water status, and stomata (24 of the 45 GO terms derived from more than 10 genes each, Supplementary Table S4). The terms “stomatal movement” (GO:0010118) and “regulation of stomatal movement” (GO:0010119) were unique to this group. The DEGs for these terms were mostly downregulated, with the exception of the term “response to water/water deprivation”, that derives from 13 up- and 4 down-regulated genes. Other highly represented, unique GO terms in the 4x_T versus 4x_C group were related to hormone/auxin (GO:0009737, GO:0009733, GO:0010817, GO:0042445). Terms related to proline (GO:0006560, GO:0006562 and GO:0010133), likely involved in osmotic stress response, were also unique to this group. Finally, two terms related to root development (GO:0048364, GO:0022622) and one with unidimensional cell growth (GO:0009826) were present.
A the 2x level, among the most represented GO terms specifically associated with drought response (group 2x_T vs. 2x_C) we found cation binding (GO:0043169, GO:0046872); regulation of gene expression/transcription/RNA (GO:0010468, GO:0051252, GO:0019219, GO:0006351, GO:0097659, GO:0032774), and the development of reproductive structures (GO:0048608, GO:0061458). Three terms related to hypoxia were also unique to this group (GO:0001666, GO:0036293, GO:0070482) (Supplementary Table S4).
The DEGs from all four comparisons were mapped onto the KEGG database to detect WGD-responsive metabolic pathways. Figure 4 shows the main KEGG pathways sorted by decreasing significance value (adjusted P-value). Among the KEGG terms, “Metabolic pathways”, “Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites” and “Plant hormone signal transduction” represented the largest groups, which were specifically observed in stressed plants (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis for the DEGs in the 2x_C versus 4x_C, 2x_T versus 4x_T, 2x_T versus 2x_C and 4x_T versus 4x_C groups. The enriched KEGG categories are listed, and the proportion of genes from the input dataset associated with each pathway relative to the total number of input genes are reported on the X-axis (Gene Ratio)
While some pathways were enriched by drought at both ploidy levels (paired green and pink dots in Fig. 4), several pathways were enriched in a ploidy-specific fashion. In 2x plants, the pathways “Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum”, “Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis”, “Inositol phosphate metabolism”, “Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis” were enriched (isolated green dots in Fig. 4). In contrast, the “Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism and “Photosynthesis” pathways were only detected in 4x plants (isolated pink dots in Fig. 4). The “Photosynthesis—antenna proteins” pathway was detected in all stress-related groups of genes but presented a much larger gene ratio in the 4x_T versus 4x_C group (0.6, 15 DEGs) than in the 2x_T versus 2x_C group (0.36, 9 DEGs). These observations confirm the results of GO enrichment analysis (Supplementary Table S4), showing that photosynthesis and plastid functions were specifically involved in drought response of 4x plants. The pathways related to DNA functions (nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, homologous recombination, DNA replication) were only detected when 2x and 4x plants were compared, both in control and stress conditions (orange and blue dots are almost always associated in Fig. 4). The majority of the genes in these pathways were upregulated in 4x with respect to 2x plants.
Mapman analyses revealed 28 downregulated and 1 upregulated gene belonging to the “Photosynthesis–Photophosphorilation” pathways, which were uniquely found in the 4x_T versus 4x_C group. Several hormone-responsive genes involved in regulation and signal transduction were also overrepresented in this group (Supplementary Table S6).
In contrast, the most represented pathways in the 2x_T versus 2x_C group were related to chaperone activity and the proteasome (11 genes, the majority of which downregulated), both categorized under ‘protein homeostasis’. The second most numerous pathway in this group was RNA biosynthesis-transcriptional regulation (6 genes), with different types of transcription factors (see below) (Supplementary Table S6). Focusing on the drought response differences between ploidy levels (2x_T vs. 4x_T group), the two most represented Mapman pathways were Cell division (cell cycle organization, meiotic recombination and DNA replication, 6 genes, and Chromatin organization, 3 genes) and RNA (transcriptional regulation, 8 genes, and RNA homeostasis, 2 genes).
Identification of transcription factor families responsive to drought
We assessed the effect of WGD on transcription factor (TF) expression by examining the numbers of TFs present within the four groups of genes defined above. Seventy-nine TFs were modulated (59.5% downregulated, 40.5% upregulated) by the drought treatment in tetraploids (4x_T vs. 4x_C, purple bars in Fig. 5), more than in the other three groups of genes (33–50).
Fig. 5.
Distribution of transcription factors responsive to drought and/or WGD in the four groups of genes
Among the TFs involved in drought response at both ploidy levels (2x_T vs. 2x_C and 4x_T vs. 4x_C groups, green and purple bars in Fig. 5), the most represented families were AP2/ERF, bHLH, MYB, NAC, and WRKY, known to play a pivotal role in drought responses (Joshi et al. 2016) (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S7). By subtracting the DEGs belonging to the 2x_C versus 4x_C group from the 2x_T versus 4x_T group, we selected the DEGs that were specifically regulated by drought in neotetraploids. With this approach, we identified 23 TFs, belonging to 13 different families, with the WRKY family most represented (6 genes). Many of these TFs were downregulated in response to drought (Supplementary Table S7), corroborating the hypothesis that tetraploids may be more responsive to drought than diploids.
Focusing on enriched GO terms for drought- and WGD-related genes
The analysis of the 2x_T versus 4x_T DEGs (Supplementary Table 8A–C) revealed 4x-upregulation of several genes associated with cell signalling, growth and development. These included M. sativa 6-phosphofructokinase (ortholog of M. truncatula PFK), M. sativa probable leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase At5g63930 isoform X2 (ortholog of M. truncatula LRR-RLK), M. sativa mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 20 (ortholog of M. truncatula MAPKKK20), and M. sativa wall-associated receptor kinase 2 (ortholog of M. truncatula WAK2). Transcripts involved in stress response were also upregulated in 4x plants: M. sativa heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein (ortholog of M. truncatula HSP70), M. sativa cold-regulated 413 inner membrane protein 1 (ortholog of M. truncatula COR413IM1) and M. sativa DMR6-LIKE OXYGENASE 1 isoform X1 (ortholog of M. truncatula DL01) (Supplementary file S8 A).
The analysis of the 4x_T versus 4x_C group DEGs revealed upregulation of M. sativa NAC domain-containing protein 55 (NAC055) transcription factor gene (ortholog of A. thaliana NAC055) (Supplementary Table S8C), previously shown to enhance drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis (Mao et al. 2016). Transcription factors associated with water and osmotic stress were also upregulated, including M. sativa Ethylene-responsive transcription factor ERF053 (ortholog of M. truncatula ERF053), M. sativa Ethylene-responsive transcription factor RAP2-1 (ortholog of A. thaliana RAP2-1), M. sativa nuclear transcription factor Y subunit B-3 (ortholog of M. truncatula NFYB3) and M. sativa WRKY transcription factor 23 (ortholog of M. truncatula WRKY23) (Nelson et al. 2007; Li et al. 2022; Singh et al. 2023). Genes encoding for M. sativa probable galactinol–sucrose galactosyltransferase 1 (ortholog of M. truncatula RFS1), M. sativa ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 6 (ortholog of M. truncatula FTSH6), M. sativa bidirectional sugar transporter SWEET12 (ortholog of M. truncatula SWEET12) and M. sativa EARLY-RESPONSIVE TO DEHYDRATION 7 (ortholog of M. truncatula ERD7) were upregulated, consistent with their role in osmolyte homeostasis and water deprivation (Taji et al. 2002; Li et al. 2021; Aubry et al. 2024).
ABA-mediated stress-responsive genes were upregulated in the 4x_T versus 4x_C group, including M. sativa HVA22-like protein (ortholog of M. truncatula HVA22-like protein), M. sativa NAC2 transcription factor, M. sativa homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-7, M. sativa Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase (ortholog of M. truncatula PIP5K) and M. sativa bHLH122-like (ortholog of M. truncatula bHLH122-like) consistent with their established functions in ABA-dependent water deficit relief (Zareen et al. 2024). Conversely, some key components of ABA signalling, such as M. sativa PYL4 and PYR1 (orthologs of M. truncatula PYL4 and PYR1) abscisic acid receptor were downregulated.
Downregulation was observed for genes related to photosynthesis within the 4x_T versus 4x_C group, including M. sativa Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase (ortholog of A. thaliana RCA), M. sativa photosystem I chlorophyll a/b-binding protein 5 (ortholog of M. truncatula LHCA5), chloroplastic, M. sativa photosystem I subunit O isoform X1 (ortholog of M. truncatula PSAO), M. sativa psbQ-like protein 3 (ortholog of M. truncatula PQL3), M. sativa photosystem II oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 3 (ortholog of M. truncatula PSBQ3) and M. sativa photosystem II reaction center PsbP family protein (ortholog of M. truncatula PSBP) (Supplementary Table S8C). Other downregulated genes in the 4x_T versus 4x_C group were M. sativa photosynthetic NDH subunit of subcomplex B (ortholog of M. truncatula PNSB), M. sativa plastocyanin-like domain protein (ortholog of M. truncatula PETE), M. sativa Protein CURVATURE THYLAKOID 1B (ortholog of A. thaliana CURT1B), M. sativa protein ACTIVITY OF BC1 COMPLEX KINASE 8 (ortholog of M. truncatula ABC1K8), M. sativa thylakoid uminal 17.9 kDa protein (ortholog of M. truncatula TL17) and M. sativa protein PLASTID TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVE 16 (ortholog of M. truncatula PTAC16). Chlorophyll catabolism was also implicated by the upregulation of M. sativa pheophorbide a oxygenase (PAO) (ortholog of M. truncatula PAO) (Supplementary file S8 C) (Das et al. 2018). Since these genes were not found in the 2x_T versus 2x_C comparison, we infer greater sensitivity of the photosynthetic apparatus under drought in 4x compared to 2x plants, consistent with the observed decline in net photosynthesis (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S1).
Co-expression network analysis
SWIMer analysis was conducted to identify master regulators for drought response affected by genome doubling (Fig. 6A, B). In the 2x_T versus 2x_C group, 136 nodes were identified, 17 of them classified as switch genes (Supplementary Table S9; Fig. 6A). In contrast, as many as 232 switch genes were identified out of 1258 nodes in the 4x_T versus 4x_C group, confirming that drought induced greater transcriptomic perturbations in neotetraploid than diploid plants (Supplementary Table S9; Fig. 6B). Many switch genes identified in the 4x group are specifically related to the photosynthetic apparatus: several Chlorophyll a–b binding proteins, Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 2, the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit, and Photosystem II reaction center protein L (PsbL) (Supplementary Table S9).
Fig. 6.
Heat cartography map of nodes generated by SWIM for the 2x_T versus 2x_C (A) and 4x_T versus 4x_C (B) datasets
The functional annotation of hub genes shared between 2x_T versus 2x_C and 4x_T versus 4x_C groups revealed GO terms associated with “response to stress” (GO:0006950), “response to abiotic stimulus” (GO:0009628), “regulation of hormone levels” (GO:0010817), “hormone metabolic process” (GO:0042445), and “cellular hormone metabolic process” (GO:0034754). We also identified stress-responsive categories such as “developmental process” (GO:0032502), “cell periphery” (GO:0071944), “anatomical structure development” (GO:0048856), and “plasma membrane” (GO:0005886) (Supplementary Table S9). Several processes related to drought response, including response to osmotic stress, transmembrane transport, photosynthetic apparatus regulation, and transcription factor activity, were specifically enriched in the 4x_T versus 4x_C group, confirming the results shown in Supplementary Table S4.
A Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA R package) was conducted to identify modules that responded to drought differently at the two ploidy levels. We filtered genes with low expression levels (see above), resulting in retention of 34,310 genes across the entire dataset. These were grouped into 37 co-expression modules through k-means clustering analysis (Supplementary Fig. S12). In WGCNA, two key metrics were evaluated within each module: module membership (MM), which quantified the extent to which a gene’s expression pattern aligns with the module eigengene, and gene significance which reflected the degree of association between a gene and a specific condition (Langfelder and Horvath 2008).
Correlation analysis across the 37 modules and the 4 comparisons (Fig. 7) revealed several modules showing consistent correlations with drought treatment (2x_T vs. 2x_C and 4x_T vs. 4x_C groups) either positive (lightyellow and blue) or negative (violet, seddlebrown, steelblue and darkgreen). Other modules showed correlations with WGD (2x_C vs. 4x_C and 2x_T vs. 4x_T groups), either positive (lightcyan, cyan) or negative (pink, green, lightgreen, purple, darkgrey). Overall, WGCNA did not identify modules significantly correlated with all four comparisons, indicating that WGD and drought drove largely independent transcriptional reprogramming.
Fig. 7.
Correlation-Based Heatmap of Module Eigengenes (MEs) and the four groups of DEGs corresponding to the drought-WGD combinations by Pearson correlation. MEs represent the first principal component of the expression profiles of all genes within a module. Correlations between MEs and groups are calculated using a student’s t-distribution approach. Modules with a correlation P-value < 0.05 are marked with asterisks. The colour gradient indicates the strength and direction of the correlation: blue shades indicate negative correlations, while red or pink shades indicate positive correlations (colour figure online)
Three modules (Skyblue3, yellow, yellowgreen and red) were specifically correlated with the 4x_T versus 4x_C comparison, while two modules (darkorange and darkred) were specifically correlated with the 2x_T versus 2x_C group (Fig. 7). We investigated the core gene sets of these six modules to identify specific or shared hubs. A gene encoding M. sativa late embryogenesis abundant protein 2 (ortholog of M. truncatula LEA2) was overexpressed in the yellowgreen module, consistent with its established roles in drought stress response (Magwanga et al. 2018). Two M. sativa Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 2 genes were observed in the yellow module and one M. sativa Photosystem II reaction center protein L (PsbL) (ortholog of M. arabica PsbL) gene was found in the yellowgreen module (Supplementary Table S10). These genes were also classified as switch genes by SWIM analysis (Supplementary Table S9), indicating their role in the neotetraploid photosynthetic network response to drought.
In the blue and lightyellow module, 5 genes encoding M. sativa delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) (orthologs of M. truncatula P5CS), a crucial enzyme in the biosynthesis of proline (Kaur and Asthir 2015), were upregulated (Supplementary Table S10). A gene encoding for M. sativa delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase 12A1 (ortholog of M. truncatula ALDH12A1) was also upregulated. These observations align with the strong increase of proline concentration induced by drought (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S8) (Yoshiba et al. 1997; Deuschle et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2014). Several DNA-binding transcription factor genes belonging to the blue and lightyellow modules were overexpressed, including M. sativa nuclear transcription factor Y subunit B-3 (ortholog of M. truncatula NFYB3), M. sativa Ethylene-responsive transcription factors ERF034 and RAP2-1 (orthologs of M. truncatula ERF034 and RAP2-1), M. sativa squamosa promoter-binding protein 1 (ortholog of M. truncatula SPL1), M. sativa NAC domain-containing protein 104 (ortholog of M. truncatula NAC104), M. sativa NAC transcription factor 29 (ortholog of A. thaliana NAC29), M. sativa Dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 3 (ortholog of A. thaliana DREB3), M. sativa transcription factor bHLH122-like protein (ortholog of M. truncatula bHLH122-like protein) and M. sativa transcription factor MYB17 (ortholog of M. truncatula MYB17) (Supplementary Table S10).
Among the most significant genes in the darkorange and darkred modules (correlated with the 2x_T vs. 2x_C dataset), several receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinases involved in defence responses were downregulated (Supplementary Table S10).
Discussion
The impact of drought on global food security is increasingly evident (Chaffai et al. 2024), making the improvement of drought tolerance a priority in crop species, including alfalfa (Al-Khayri et al. 2016; Humphries et al. 2021). WGD has shown the potential to enhance stress tolerance through a complex interplay of genomic, physiological, and molecular mechanisms encompassing genome buffering, greater flexibility in gene expression, and epigenetic modifications (Doyle and Coate 2019; Heslop-Harrison et al. 2023). Therefore, this study on the effects of drought on 2x and 4x full sib alfalfa plants was undertaken to test the hypothesis of polyploid advantage and the immediate impacts of WGD.
The concept of conducting genetic studies and breeding programs at the 2x level and transferring the results to the 4x cultivated materials through 2n gametes was introduced many years ago (Chase 1963, 1964; McCoy and Bingham 1988). For example, in potato, there are several examples of sourcing genes conferring tolerance to abiotic stress for introgression into 4x cultivated potato by ploidy manipulation through unilateral sexual polyploidization (4x × 2x or 2x × 4x crosses) (Carputo et al. 2000).
Wild, diploid M. sativa can be a valuable source of stress tolerance genes (Humphreys et al. 2021) for introgression into 4x alfalfa cultivars via 2n gametes. However, ploidy level can affect gene expression (as shown in the alfalfa plants studied here, Santoro et al. 2025), and it cannot be assumed that the effect of drought tolerance genes (in the case of our study) are the same in both 2x and 4x plants. Therefore, studying the impact of drought stress on gene expression in full sib plants at two ploidy levels is a preliminary step to the establishment of breeding programs aimed at introgressing genes from 2x to 4x alfalfa. In the longer term, our results could help to identify drought tolerance genes that are either not impacted by WGD or are enhanced by WGD to use as breeding targets for improved adaptation to drought (Tossi et al. 2022).
In this experiment, we found that physiological and biochemical traits were significantly affected by drought in both 2x and 4x plants, but the differences between ploidies were small and nonsignificant, indicating that, in our experimental conditions, WGD alone did not improve nor reduce drought tolerance. Lower photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration and leaf relative water content per unit leaf area was observed in 4x compared to 2x under both drought and control conditions, accompanied by slightly higher chlorophyll content. In a previous work, we found that in the leaves of the studied plants, stomata density was about 30% lower in 4x plants relative to 2x plants, and stomata surface was about 30% larger (Rosellini et al. 2016). Thus, gas exchange and consequently photosynthesis per unit leaf area are deeply affected by WGD.
In control conditions, we observed that 4x plants had lower physiological parameters than 2x plants: photosynthetic rate (− 20.83%), stomatal conductance (− 27.51%), and transpiration rate per unit leaf area (− 28.83%). Since the total leaf surface is 35% larger in 4x plants (Rosellini et al. 2016), we calculated the physiological parameters per leaf in the 4x plants by multiplying all parameters by 1.35, obtaining slightly higher values in 4x compared to 2x plants. The overall picture that we can draw from gas exchange-based photosynthesis-related traits is that 4x plants had lower photosynthetic potential than 2x plants per unit leaf area, but their larger leaves allowed them to outperform the per leaf photosynthetic potential of 2x plants. Our data appear in contrast with older studies reporting that the M. sativa photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area did not change with WGD (Meyers et al. 1982a, b; Molin et al. 1982). However, studies in Fragaria (Gao et al. 2017) appear to confirm our findings, showing that wild 4x genotypes have lower net photosynthetic rates, transpiration rates and stomatal conductivity compared with 2x genotypes.
Interestingly, in 4x plants under drought stress we observed a larger, though not significantly, reduction of physiological parameters than in 2x plants: photosynthetic rate (− 41.96%), stomatal conductance (− 44.38%) and transpiration rate (− 43.43%). The concomitant downregulation of hundreds of genes involved in photosynthesis and stomatal movement suggests that WGD made the 4x plants more responsive to drought. This hypothesis is consistent with a recent study of water allocation across four ploidy levels in the Dianthus broteri species complex, indicating a shift in water use strategy with greater allocation to roots and xylem, with the potential to increase water uptake under water limiting conditions (Lòpez-Jurado et al. 2025). Regulating stomatal conductance to control CO2 uptake and water loss has been observed as a response to drought in ssp falcata: some wild ssp. Falcata populations had lower stomatal conductance (Ray et al. 2004) and higher leaf chlorophyll content under severe drought compared to domesticated alfalfa (Hanson 2015), indicating ability to delay leaf senescence and retain water under drought.
In this study, the neotetraploids showed a distinctive transcriptomic response to drought compared to diploids, possibly connected with controlling water loss from their larger cells and stomata, thus conserving water in the face of stress. The scope of this experiment does not allow us to make statements on long term impacts of WGD on drought response but reveals an immediate shift at the transcriptional level.
Further looking into the transcriptome through gene ontology and pathway enrichment analyses, we identified several hundred transcripts that were specifically associated with the drought response of neopolyploid plants. The most notable finding was the involvement of genes related to plastids and photosynthesis in the 4x response to drought, which were not found at the 2x level, indicating that WGD affected photosynthesis under stress (Warner and Edwards 1993; Coate et al. 2012).
Five genes encoding Δ-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), a key enzyme of proline biosynthesis, were found to be upregulated in both 2x and 4x plants under drought, confirming that proline accumulation is a mechanism for overcoming osmotic stress under drought (Ozturk et al. 2021). However, at the biochemical level, we found higher proline levels in 4x than in 2x plants, both in control (+ 37.56%) and drought conditions (+ 18.65%). This indicates that the 4x plants require a higher osmolyte concentration creating a lower constitutive osmotic potential level, possibly due to 4x cells having a higher volume-to-surface ratio (Doyle and Coate 2019). In yeast, transgenic increase of proline content brought about polyploidy (Maggio et al. 2002), suggesting that a relationship may exist between proline concentration and cell volume. This may help to explain upregulation of a gene encoding Δ−1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (associated with protection from proline toxicity, Deuschle et al. 2001) that we observed in 4x plants exposed to drought. In summary, WGD per se may require an increase in proline concentration due to increased cell volume, and this may affect drought stress response.
Transcriptomic analyses also revealed that a set of phytohormone genes responded to drought in a ploidy-independent manner. The cytokinin receptor histidine kinase AHK3 was up-regulated at both ploidy levels: it is known to function as a negative regulator of ABA and osmotic stress signalling in a cytokinin-dependent manner (Tran et al. 2007, 2010). This suggests a regulatory mechanism where ABA-responsive pathways are activated while signalling components are modulated to fine-tune the stress response (Valdés et al. 2012; Dittrich et al. 2019). Additionally, both the F-box protein GID2-like and gibberellin receptor GID1b were found to be upregulated. These proteins are integral to the gibberellin signal transduction cascade, facilitating DELLA degradation and enhancing stress resilience by modulating growth and environmental response mechanisms (Tran and Pal 2014). Transcription factor families that are well-established mediators of drought response in plants AP2/ERF, bHLH, MYB, NAC, and WRKY (Joshi et al. 2016) were overrepresented among WGD-related DEGs under drought. We also found down-regulation of ABA biosynthetic genes. These findings suggest a regulatory network that balances ABA levels at 4x level in response to drought differently than in 2x plants (Deuschle et al. 2001; Kuromori et al. 2018; Shrestha et al. 2021). We also found that in neotetraploid plants under drought, genes implicated in cell wall signalling, growth and development were mostly downregulated. This suggests that in the larger cells of 4x plants, the cell walls need to comply with drought with transcriptional changes (Cosgrove 2005; Tenhaken 2015).
Lastly, it should be mentioned that comparison of 2x with 4x plants in control conditions revealed that more DEGs were up-regulated than down-regulated in 4x plants (73%). These data confirm previous findings in the same plant materials (Santoro et al. 2025) and indicates that neopolyploidization brings about a more than proportional transcription level change on a per-cell basis for about 2000 genes (2,019 DEGs in control conditions, 1,866 DEGs in drought conditions). Also, the number of genes that were specifically affected by WGD (845) was similar to what we observed for the same plants in different environmental conditions (714 ploidy-sensitive genes, Santoro et al. 2025).
Conclusions
This study delved into the effects of WGD on alfalfa response to drought. While phenotypic traits, such as photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration were similarly affected by drought in 2x and 4x plants, their transcriptomes diverged to a significant extent, indicating that WGD brings about a new transcriptional equilibrium for basic functions such as photosynthesis, osmotic balance, and hormonal signalling, but this did not translate into significant phenotypic divergence in response to drought. In other words, different transcriptional landscapes lead to similar phenotypes of 4x and 2x plants in the tested drought conditions. These results indicate that WGD does not immediately enhance tolerance to drought in alfalfa, though larger scale field studies would be necessary to confirm these findings. On the other hand, it cannot be excluded that WGD sets the stage for long-term adaptation to drought, given the transcriptional novelty that we observed. We are currently testing other abiotic stress types to gain a more comprehensive picture of the impact of WGD on stress tolerance in alfalfa.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by funding from MIUR-PRIN Project 2020HB9PR9 (local PI: DR). We would like to acknowledge the national MIUR-PRIN project leader Domenico Carputo who critically read the manuscript. We thank Nicola Cinosi, Dept. of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Italy, for assisting with LI-COR troubleshooting. We thank the students Giulia Ambrosi and Benedetto Battaglia for sample processing. The authors thank Flavio Gabrieli for his bioinformatic insights on the correlation network analysis presented in this study. This work is dedicated to Edwin Bingham (1936–2024), pioneer of research on 2n gametes in alfalfa.
Author contributions
Study design, project management: DR. Experimental Design: DR, AWA. Data Collection: DFS, AWA, SNA, VAMP. Sample processing: DFS, SNA, VAMP. Data Analysis: AWA, DFS, DR. Draft manuscript: DFS, DR. All Authors read, edited, and approved the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Perugia within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This work was supported by MIUR-PRIN Project 2020HB9PR9.
Data availability
Transcriptome data for this project has been submitted to NCBI-SRA (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/) with BioProject accession number (PRJNA1219831). All other data is available upon request.
Declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
D. F. Santoro and A. W. Anderson authors have contributed equally.
References
- Abdul-Jabbar AS, Sammis TW, Lugg DG (1982) Effect of moisture level on the root pattern of alfalfa. Irrig Sci 3:197–207. 10.1007/BF00446008 [Google Scholar]
- Al-Khayri JM, Jain SM, Johnson DV (2016) Advances in plant breeding strategies: agronomic, abiotic and biotic stress traits
- Aubry E, Clément G, Gilbault E et al (2024) Changes in SWEET-mediated sugar partitioning affect photosynthesis performance and plant response to drought. Physiol Plant. 10.1111/ppl.14623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barcaccia G, Tavoletti S, Falcinelli M, Veronesi F (1997) Environmental influences on the frequency and viability of meiotic and apomeiotic cells of a diploid mutant of alfalfa. Crop Sci 37:70–76. 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010011x [Google Scholar]
- Botía JA, Vandrovcova J, Forabosco P et al (2017) An additional k-means clustering step improves the biological features of WGCNA gene co-expression networks. BMC Syst Biol 11:1–16. 10.1186/s12918-017-0420-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bu D, Luo H, Huo P et al (2021) KOBAS-i: intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W317–W325. 10.1093/nar/gkab447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH (2014) Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carillo P, Gibon Y (2011) Protocol: extraction and determination of proline. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 43:146–152 [Google Scholar]
- Carputo D, Barone A, Frusciante L (2000) 2n gametes in the potato: essential ingredients for breeding and germplasm transfer. Theor Appl Genet 101:805–813 [Google Scholar]
- Carter PR, Sheaffer CC (1983) Alfalfa response to soil water deficits. I. Growth, forage quality, yield, water use, and water-use efficiency 1. Crop Sci 23:669–675. 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183x002300040016x [Google Scholar]
- Chaffai R, Ganesan M, Cherif A (2024) Global drought threat: impact on food security. In: Chaffai R, Ganesan M, Cherif A (eds) Plant adaptation to abiotic stress: from signaling pathways and microbiomes to molecular mechanisms. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 61–82
- Chase SS (1963) Analytic breeding in solanum tuberosum l.—a scheme utilizing parthenotes and other diploid stocks. Can J Genet Cytol 5:359–363. 10.1139/g63-049 [Google Scholar]
- Chase SS (1964) Analytic breeding of amphipolyploid plant varieties. Crop Sci 4:334–337. 10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400030031x [Google Scholar]
- Coate JE, Luciano AK, Seralathan V et al (2012) Anatomical, biochemical, and photosynthetic responses to recent allopolyploidy in Glycine dolichocarpa (fabaceae). Am J Bot 99:55–67. 10.3732/ajb.1100465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cosgrove DJ (2005) Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:850–861. 10.1038/nrm1746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai A (2013) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Change 3:52–58. 10.1038/nclimate1633 [Google Scholar]
- Das A, Christ B, Hörtensteiner S (2018) Characterization of the pheophorbide a oxygenase/phyllobilin pathway of chlorophyll breakdown in grasses. Planta 248:875–892. 10.1007/s00425-018-2946-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidson NM, Oshlack A (2014) Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novo assembled transcriptomes. Genome Biol 15:1–14. 10.1186/s13059-014-0410-6 [Google Scholar]
- De Storme N, Mason A (2014) Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr Plant Biol 1:10–33. 10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002 [Google Scholar]
- Del Pozo JC, Ramirez-Parra E (2014) Deciphering the molecular bases for drought tolerance in Arabidopsis autotetraploids. Plant Cell Environ 37:2722–2737. 10.1111/pce.12344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deuschle K, Funck D, Hellmann H et al (2001) A nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase and its potential role in protection from proline toxicity. Plant J 27:345–356. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01101.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhindsa RS, Plumb-dhindsa P, Thorpe TA (1981) Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot 32:93–101. 10.1093/jxb/32.1.93 [Google Scholar]
- Diatta AA, Min D, Jagadish SVK (2021) Drought stress responses in non-transgenic and transgenic alfalfa—current status and future research directions. In: Advances in agronomy. Elsevier, pp 35–100
- Dittrich M, Mueller HM, Bauer H et al (2019) The role of Arabidopsis ABA receptors from the PYR/PYL/RCAR family in stomatal acclimation and closure signal integration. Nat Plants 5:1002–1011. 10.1038/s41477-019-0490-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doyle JJ, Coate JE (2019) Polyploidy, the nucleotype, and novelty: the impact of genome doubling on the biology of the cell. Int J Plant Sci 180:1–52. 10.1086/700636 [Google Scholar]
- Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van De Peer Y (2009) Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:5737–5742. 10.1073/pnas.0900906106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR (2011) HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 39:29–37. 10.1093/nar/gkr367 [Google Scholar]
- Folk RA, Siniscalchi CM, Soltis DE (2020) Angiosperms at the edge: extremity, diversity, and phylogeny. Plant Cell Environ 43:2871–2893. 10.1111/pce.13887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao S, Yan Q, Chen L et al (2017) Effects of ploidy level and haplotype on variation of photosynthetic traits: novel evidence from two Fragaria species. PLoS ONE 12:1–13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179899 [Google Scholar]
- Ge SX, Jung D, Jung D, Yao R (2018) ShinyGO: a graphical enrichment tool for ani-mals and plants. bioRxiv 36:315150. 10.1101/082511.Lai [Google Scholar]
- Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J et al (2008) High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3420–3435. 10.1093/nar/gkn176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M et al (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29:644–652. 10.1038/nbt.1883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson A (2015) Evaluating physiological responses of ten alfalfa (Medicago sativa subsp. falcata) germplasm to drought treatments. J Undergrad Res 13:124–137 [Google Scholar]
- Hao GY, Lucero ME, Sanderson SC et al (2013) Polyploidy enhances the occupation of heterogeneous environments through hydraulic related trade-offs in Atriplex canescens (Chenopodiaceae). New Phytol 197:970–978. 10.1111/nph.12051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heslop-Harrison JS, Schwarzacher T, Liu Q (2023) Polyploidy: its consequences and enabling role in plant diversification and evolution. Ann Bot 131:1–9. 10.1093/aob/mcac132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphries AW, Ovalle C, Hughes S et al (2021) Characterization and pre-breeding of diverse alfalfa wild relatives originating from drought-stressed environments. Crop Sci 61:69–88. 10.1002/csc2.20274 [Google Scholar]
- Joshi R, Wani SH, Singh B et al (2016) Transcription factors and plants response to drought stress: current understanding and future directions. Front Plant Sci 7:1–15. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang Y, Seminario A, Udvardi M, Annicchiarico P (2023) Physiological and biochemical adaptive traits support the specific breeding of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) for severely drought-stressed or moisture-favourable environments. J Agron Crop Sci 209:132–143. 10.1111/jac.12600 [Google Scholar]
- Kaur G, Asthir B (2015) Proline: a key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Biol Plant 59:609–619. 10.1007/s10535-015-0549-3 [Google Scholar]
- Kuromori T, Seo M, Shinozaki K (2018) ABA transport and plant water stress responses. Trends Plant Sci 23:513–522. 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 [Google Scholar]
- Li Q, Jiang W, Jiang Z et al (2022) Transcriptome and functional analyses reveal ERF053 from Medicago falcata as key regulator in drought resistances. Front Plant Sci 13:1–15. 10.3389/fpls.2022.995754 [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Jiang H, Liu J et al (2021) Characteristics of TaFTSH6 gene and expression analysis under dry and heat stress in wheat. Triticeae Genomics Genet 12:1–10. 10.5376/tgg.2021.12.0001 [Google Scholar]
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohse M, Nagel A, Herter T et al (2014) Mercator: a fast and simple web server for genome scale functional annotation of plant sequence data. Plant Cell Environ 37:1250–1258. 10.1111/pce.12231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- López-Jurado J, Bourbia I, Brodribb TJ (2025) Polyploidy drives changes in tissue allocation modifying whole-plant water relations. Plant Physiol 197:kiaf079. 10.1093/plphys/kiaf079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:1–21. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [Google Scholar]
- Madlung A (2013) Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: old questions revisited with new tools. Heredity 110:99–104. 10.1038/hdy.2012.79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maggio A, Miyazaki S, Veronese P et al (2002) Does proline accumulation play an active role in stress-induced growth reduction? Plant J 31:699–712. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01389.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magwanga RO, Lu P, Kirungu JN et al (2018) Characterization of the late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins family and their role in drought stress tolerance in upland cotton. BMC Genet 19:1–31. 10.1186/s12863-017-0596-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maherali H, Walden AE, Husband BC (2009) Genome duplication and the evolution of physiological responses to water stress. New Phytol 184:721–731. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02997.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao H, Yu L, Han R et al (2016) ZmNAC55, a maize stress-responsive NAC transcription factor, confers drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem 105:55–66. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCoy Tj, Bingham ET (1988) Cytology and Cytogenetics OF ALFALFA. In: Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR (Eds) Alfalfa and ALFALFA IMPROVEMENT. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison (WI) USA pp 737–776
- Meyers SP, Molin WT, Selman BR, Schrader LE (1982a) Ploidy effects in isogenic populations of alfalfa: III. Chloroplast thylakoid-bound coupling factor 1 in protoplasts and leaves. Plant Physiol 70:1715–1717. 10.1104/pp.70.6.1715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyers SP, Nichols SL, Baer GR et al (1982b) Ploidy effects in isogenic populations of alfalfa: I. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, soluble protein, chlorophyll, and DNA in leaves. Plant Physiol 70:1704–1709. 10.1104/pp.70.6.1704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molin WT, Meyers SP, Baer GR, Schrader LE (1982) Ploidy effects in isogenic populations of alfalfa: II. Photosynthesis, chloroplast number, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, chlorophyll, and DNA in protoplasts. Plant Physiol 70:1710–1714. 10.1104/pp.70.6.1710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S et al (2007) KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res 35:182–185. 10.1093/nar/gkm321 [Google Scholar]
- Morris JP, Baslan T, Soltis DE et al (2024) Integrating the study of polyploidy across organisms, tissues, and disease. Annu Rev Genet. 10.1146/annurev-genet-111523-102124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson DE, Repetti PP, Adams TR et al (2007) Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16450–16455. 10.1073/pnas.0707193104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozturk M, Turkyilmaz Unal B, García-Caparrós P et al (2021) Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiol Plant 172:1321–1335. 10.1111/ppl.13297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paci P, Colombo T, Fiscon G et al (2017) SWIM: a computational tool to unveiling crucial nodes in complex biological networks. Sci Rep. 10.1038/srep44797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson PR, Sheaffer CC, Hall MH (1992) Drought effects on perennial forage legume yield and quality. Agron J 84:774–779. 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400050003x [Google Scholar]
- Ray IM, Han Y, E L et al (2015) Identification of quantitative trait loci for alfalfa forage biomass productivity during drought stress. Crop Sci 55:2012–2033. 10.2135/cropsci2014.12.0840 [Google Scholar]
- Ray IM, Segovia-Lerma A, Murray LW (2004) Diallel analysis of carbon isotope discrimination and its association with forage yield among nine historically recognized alfalfa germplasms. Crop Sci 44:1970–1975. 10.2135/cropsci2004.1970 [Google Scholar]
- Rosellini D, Ferradini N, Allegrucci S et al (2016) Sexual polyploidization in Medicago sativa L.: impact on the phenotype, gene transcription, and genome methylation. G3 Genes|genomes|genetics 6:925–938. 10.1534/g3.115.026021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz M, Oustric J, Santini J, Morillon R (2020) Synthetic polyploidy in grafted crops. Front Plant Sci. 10.3389/fpls.2020.540894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salman-Minkov A, Sabath N, Mayrose I (2016) Whole-genome duplication as a key factor in crop domestication. Nat Plants 2:1–4. 10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.115 [Google Scholar]
- Santoro DF, Marconi G, Capomaccio S et al (2025) Polyploidization-driven transcriptomic dynamics in Medicago sativa neotetraploids: mRNA, smRNA and allele-specific gene expression. BMC Plant Biol 25:108. 10.1186/s12870-025-06090-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwalm CR, Anderegg WRL, Michalak AM et al (2017) Global patterns of drought recovery. Nature 548:202–205. 10.1038/nature23021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shrestha A, Cudjoe DK, Kamruzzaman M et al (2021) Abscisic acid-responsive element binding transcription factors contribute to proline synthesis and stress adaptation in Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol. 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P et al (2015) BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer SD, Hannoufa A, Acharya S (2018) Molecular improvement of alfalfa for enhanced productivity and adaptability in a changing environment. Plant Cell Environ 41:1955–1971. 10.1111/pce.13090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh D, Debnath P, Sane AP, Sane VA (2023) Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) WRKY23 enhances salt and osmotic stress tolerance by modulating the ethylene and auxin pathways in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem 195:330–340. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2012) Polyploidy and genome evolution. Polyploidy Genome Evol 9783642314:1–415. 10.1007/978-3-642-31442-1 [Google Scholar]
- Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S et al (2002) Important roles of drought- and cold-inducible genes for galactinol synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 29:417–426. 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01227.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tardieu F, Simonneau T, Muller B (2018) The physiological basis of drought tolerance in crop plants: a scenario-dependent probabilistic approach. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69:733–759. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tavoletti S (1994) Cytological mechanisms of 2n egg formation in a diploid genotype of Medicago sativa subsp. falcata. Euphytica 75:1–8. 10.1007/BF00024525 [Google Scholar]
- Tavoletti S, Mariani A, Veronesi F (1991) Phenotypic recurrent selection for 2n pollen and 2n egg production in diploid alfalfa. Euphytica 57:97–102. 10.1007/BF00023066 [Google Scholar]
- Te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM et al (2012) The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Ann Bot 109:19–45. 10.1093/aob/mcr277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenhaken R (2015) Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress. Front Plant Sci 5:1–9. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00771 [Google Scholar]
- Thimm O, Bläsing O, Gibon Y et al (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37:914–939. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02016.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tossi VE, Martínez Tosar LJ, Laino LE et al (2022) Impact of polyploidy on plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Front Plant Sci 13:1–19. 10.3389/fpls.2022.869423 [Google Scholar]
- Touma D, Ashfaq M, Nayak MA et al (2015) A multi-model and multi-index evaluation of drought characteristics in the 21st century. J Hydrol 526:196–207. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.011 [Google Scholar]
- Tran LSP, Pal S (2014) Phytohormones: a window to metabolism, signaling and biotechnological applications
- Tran LSP, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2010) Role of cytokinin responsive two-component system in ABA and osmotic stress signalings. Plant Signal Behav 5:148–150. 10.4161/psb.5.2.10411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tran LSP, Urao T, Qin F et al (2007) Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20623–20628. 10.1073/pnas.0706547105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valdés AE, Övernäs E, Johansson H et al (2012) The homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) class I transcription factors ATHB7 and ATHB12 modulate abscisic acid signalling by regulating protein phosphatase 2C and abscisic acid receptor gene activities. Plant Mol Biol 80:405–418. 10.1007/s11103-012-9956-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van de Peer Y, Ashman TL, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2021) Polyploidy: an evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times. Plant Cell 33:11–26. 10.1093/plcell/koaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van De Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K (2017) The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat Rev Genet 18:411–424. 10.1038/nrg.2017.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vanneste K, Baele G, Maere S, Van De Peer Y (2014) Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplications in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Genome Res 24:1334–1347. 10.1101/gr.168997.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warner DA, Edwards GE (1993) Effects of polyploidy on photosynthesis. Photosynth Res 35:135–147. 10.1007/BF00014744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong K-H, Wu H-Y, Shum CW-Y et al (2025) Transcriptome profiling of Hyacinthus orientalis L. cultivars in floral pigmentation. Sci Data 12:689. 10.1038/s41597-025-04977-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS et al (2009) The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:13875–13879. 10.1073/pnas.0811575106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang PM, Huang QC, Qin GY et al (2014) Different drought-stress responses in photosynthesis and reactive oxygen metabolism between autotetraploid and diploid rice. Photosynthetica 52:193–202. 10.1007/s11099-014-0020-2 [Google Scholar]
- Yoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Nakashima K et al (1997) Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress. Plant Cell Physiol 38:1095–1102. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zareen S, Ali A, Yun DJ (2024) Significance of ABA biosynthesis in plant adaptation to drought stress. J Plant Biol 67:175–184. 10.1007/s12374-024-09425-9 [Google Scholar]
- Zhang C, Shi S, Liu Z et al (2019) Drought tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties is associated with enhanced antioxidative protection and declined lipid peroxidation. J Plant Physiol 232:226–240. 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F, Xue H, Lu X et al (2015) Autotetraploidization enhances drought stress tolerance in two apple cultivars. Trees-Struct Funct 29:1773–1780. 10.1007/s00468-015-1258-4 [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Duan Z, Jahufer Z et al (2014) Stress-inducible expression of a Cleistogenes songorica ALDH gene enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant OMICS 7:438–444 [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Y, Jiao C, Sun H et al (2016) iTAK: a program for genome-wide prediction and classification of plant transcription factors, transcriptional regulators, and protein kinases. Mol Plant 9:1667–1670. 10.1016/j.molp.2016.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Z, Li J, Gao Y et al (2024) Research on drought stress in Medicago sativa L. from 1998 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis. Front Plant Sci 15:1406256. 10.3389/fpls.2024.1406256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Transcriptome data for this project has been submitted to NCBI-SRA (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/) with BioProject accession number (PRJNA1219831). All other data is available upon request.






