ABSTRACT
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but fatal blood disorder characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and multi‐organ dysfunction. This condition often worsens during pregnancy and the postpartum period due to physiological changes. The present study reports a case of refractory TTP in a pregnant woman with a history of positive COVID‐19 infection who required aggressive treatment throughout her pregnancy and postpartum recovery. A 41‐year‐old pregnant woman (G3P2L2; C/S × 2) presented at 6 weeks of gestation with sudden hematuria, fever, and a positive COVID‐19 PCR test. Laboratory findings revealed the presence of schistocytes on the blood smear and a platelet count of 10,000/μL, strongly suggestive of TTP. Following hematology and gastroenterology evaluations, treatment was initiated immediately with methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg) and plasma exchange (PLEX). At 11 weeks of gestation, the patient's platelet count decreased to 12,000/μL, with evidence of hemolysis. She underwent eight sessions of PLEX and continued oral prednisolone therapy (1 mg/kg). The patient was subsequently discharged with a platelet count of 300,000/μL. Weekly outpatient PLEX and oral prednisolone were maintained throughout the pregnancy. At 36 weeks of gestation, the patient presented with labor pain and headache, leading to an emergency cesarean section. Postoperatively, she underwent 10 additional PLEX sessions and continued oral prednisolone treatment. She was discharged after 2 weeks in stable condition, without further complications. In conclusion, post‐COVID‐19 TTP could affect women and poses substantial therapeutic challenges. This case study highlights the complexities involved in managing refractory TTP during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
Keywords: COVID‐19, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, pregnancy, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
Summary.
COVID‐19 can cause refractory thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
Recognition of this potential association is essential for timely diagnosis and effective management.
1. Introduction
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare, life‐threatening condition, affecting approximately 10 individuals per million in the general population [1]. Pregnancy induces a prothrombotic state, which can complicate the diagnosis and management of TTP. While this condition typically occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy, it can, though rarely, present early in pregnancy, posing significant clinical challenges for both the mother and the fetus [2].
Since the emergence of COVID‐19, various coagulation disorders have been reported in recovering patients. These coagulopathies include deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism, and thrombotic microangiopathies such as TTP and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The exact mechanisms behind these disorders remain unknown; however, TTP is believed to involve an autoimmune response characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting ADAMTS13 [3, 4].
Diagnosis of TTP is primarily clinical and relies on laboratory findings. Common symptoms include skin rashes, fever, pale skin, confusion, and headaches. Laboratory findings typically show microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and multi‐organ dysfunction, with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia being the most classic finding in TTP [5]. However, the absence of obvious symptoms in many patients underscores the importance of rigorous laboratory assessment.
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura mainly arises from a deficiency or inhibition of ADAMTS13—a metalloproteinase responsible for cleaving a significant portion of von Willebrand factor (vWF). The standard treatment for TTP is plasma exchange (PLEX) therapy, which aims to increase the patient's ADAMTS13 levels [6]. Notably, most cases of TTP experience recurrent episodes.
The current case report discusses a 41‐year‐old pregnant woman who was diagnosed with TTP at 6 weeks of pregnancy. She underwent multiple sessions of positron emission tomography and immunosuppressive therapy. This report highlights the critical importance of early diagnosis of TTP and appropriate intervention to address complications associated with refractory TTP during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
2. Case History
A 41‐year‐old pregnant woman (G3P2L2 C/S × 2) presented to Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran, at 6 weeks of gestation, due to sudden hematuria and fever. At the time of admission, a nasopharyngeal swab confirmed COVID‐19 infection through a positive RT‐PCR test. Physical examination indicated conjunctival pallor, but there were no signs of rash, purpura, or petechiae. Neurological assessment showed no abnormalities. Her vital signs were as follows: pulse rate of 98 bpm, blood pressure of 112/76 mmHg, body temperature of 38.5°C, and respiratory rate of 19 beats per min (bpm).
2.1. Differential Diagnosis, Investigations, and Treatment
Initial laboratory findings demonstrated that the patient had a hemoglobin (Hb) level of 8.5 g/dL and a platelet count of 12,000/μL. Additional findings exhibited mildly elevated liver enzymes, along with proteinuria and hematuria on urinalysis. Total bilirubin was elevated at 3.1 mg/dL, creatinine measured 0.7 mg/dL, haptoglobin level was reduced to 0.151 mg/dL, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was significantly elevated at 1692 U/L. Fibrinogen levels were recorded at 389 mg/dL, D‐dimer at 2588 μ/mL, and the reticulocyte production index (RPI) at 1.5. Peripheral blood smear showed normocytic anemia and thrombocytopenia, with the presence of schistocytes (Table 1). Abdominal ultrasound revealed normal results. Clinically, the patient reported flu‐like symptoms, including rhinorrhea and low‐grade fever, persisting for the past 2 weeks. While no additional diagnostic tests were performed, her clinical presentation was suggestive of a COVID‐19 infection. The presence of schistocytes on the blood smear, a critical finding in microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, strongly supported the diagnosis of TTP. ADAMTS13 antibody testing was initiated; however, treatment was immediately started due to high clinical suspicion, without awaiting the results. Following hematology and gastroenterology consultations, the patient received immediate therapy consisting of methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg) and PLEX. She underwent four sessions of PLEX therapy. After 3 days of treatment, her platelet count increased to 152,000/μL, and her Hb level stabilized at 10 g/dL. The patient was subsequently discharged, with follow‐up appointments arranged with obstetrics and hematology within 3 days.
TABLE 1.
Laboratory findings obtained following the patient's admission at a gestational age of 6 weeks.
| Laboratory tests | Normal range | |
|---|---|---|
| Na | 138 meq/L | 135–145 |
| K | 3.5 meq/L | 3.5–5 |
| PT | 13.6 s | 10–13.8 |
| INR | 1.09 | 0.8–1.12 |
| PTT | 29.7 s | 20–40 |
| Uric acid | 3.9 mg/dL | 3.6–8 |
| AST | 69 iU/L | Up to 38 |
| ALT | 27 iU/L | Up to 42 |
| AlkP | 119 U/L | 64–306 |
| Ca | 8.3 mg/dL | 8.5–10.5 |
| Ph | 2.2 mg/dL | 2.5–5 |
| Mg | 1.6 mg/dL | 1.5–2.5 |
| CRP | 46.9 mg/L | Up to 6 |
| Anti ds DNA | 12.4 Iu/mL | Negative: Up to 30 |
| Equivocal: 30–35 | ||
| Positive: > 35 | ||
| ANA | < 1/100 | Negative: < 1/100 |
| WBC | 7900/dL | 4000–11,000 |
| Hemoglobin | 9.8 g/dL | 12–16 |
| MCV | 89.16 fL | 80–102 |
| PLT | 12,000/μL | 160–450 |
| RPI | 1.5% | 0.5%–2.5% |
| Lactate | 12 mg/dL | Arterial Blood: 8.1–15.3 |
| Venous Blood: 5.5–14.5 | ||
| LDH | 2607 U/L | 230–480 |
| Urine analysis | Protein +++, Blood ++++, WBC = 2–3, RBC = 20–45 | |
| PBS | Schistocyte: +, Giant PLT: + | |
| COVID‐19 PCR | Positive | |
2.2. Patient's Outcome and Follow‐Up
The patient returned 1 month later, at 11 weeks of gestation, with a decreased platelet count of 10,000/μL and signs of hemolysis. She received four sessions of PLEX therapy and was also prescribed oral prednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg. Following the treatment, her platelet count increased to 300,000/μL (Table 2), and she was discharged with a plan for weekly outpatient PLEX and ongoing oral prednisolone therapy (1 mg/kg). At 36 weeks of gestation, the patient was admitted due to labor pains, headaches, nausea, vomiting, and suicidal thoughts. Upon examination, her pulse was 96 bpm, blood pressure was 150/110 mmHg, body temperature was 37.5°C, and respiratory rate was 19 bpm. Initial laboratory findings showed a Hb level of 12.6 g/dL, a platelet count of 46,000/μL, mild elevation in liver enzymes, presence of proteinuria, and evidence of hemolysis (Table 3). Given the diagnosis of TTP and severe pre‐eclampsia, an emergency cesarean section was performed. The patient underwent eight additional sessions of PLEX, while continuing her prednisolone treatment at 1 mg/kg. Following surgery, a gradual normalization of her platelet count, LDH levels, and liver enzymes was observed. However, on Day 10 post‐operation, the patient developed epigastric pain accompanied by a sudden increase in liver enzyme levels. An abdominal sonography revealed distention of the common bile duct, along with biliary sludge and small stones, measuring up to 32 mm in diameter, within the posterior shadow. A cholangiopancreatography was conducted, and the findings were normal. Eventually, her liver enzyme levels began to normalize, and she was discharged in stable condition without any complications (Figure 1).
TABLE 2.
Laboratory findings obtained following the patient's admission at a gestational age of 11 weeks.
| Laboratory tests | Normal range | |
|---|---|---|
| PT | 10.4 s | 10–13.8 |
| INR | 0.95 | 0.8–1.12 |
| PTT | 25.6 s | 20–40 |
| WBC | 8800/dL | 4000–11,000 |
| Hemoglobin | 5.6 g/dL | 12–16 |
| MCV | 104.9 fL | 80–102 |
| PLT | 100,000/μL | 160–450 |
| RPI | 2.38% | 0.5%–2.5% |
| LDH | 580 U/L | 230–480 |
| ADAMTS13 activity | 19% | 40%–130% |
| PBS | Schistocyte: 2+ | |
| Polychromasia: 3+ | ||
| Anisocytosis: 2+ | ||
TABLE 3.
Laboratory findings obtained following the patient's admission at a gestational age of 36 weeks.
| Lab tests | Normal range | |
|---|---|---|
| AST | 39 iU/L | Up to 38 |
| ALT | 20 iU/L | Up to 42 |
| AlkP | 191 U/L | 64–306 |
| WBC | 11,200/dL | 4000–11,000 |
| Hemoglobin | 13.6 g/dL | 12–16 |
| MCV | 87.56 fL | 80–103 |
| PLT | 76,000/μL | 230–480 |
| RPI | 5.02% | 0.5%–2.5% |
| ADAMTS Ab | 3.9 IU/mL | Negative: < 12 |
| Borderline: 12–15 | ||
| Positive: > 15 | ||
FIGURE 1.

Timeline of clinical relapses with corresponding laboratory findings and treatments from 6 to 36 weeks of gestation. The figure summarizes hemoglobin and platelet levels, evidence of hemolysis, additional laboratory abnormalities, and the interventions used at each relapse episode, including corticosteroid therapy, plasma exchange (PLEX), and emergency delivery.
2.3. Fetal Outcome
The newborn was delivered with APGAR scores of 6 at 1 min and 8 at 5 min, and had a birth weight of 1420 g. Due to the maternal history and low APGAR scores, the neonate was admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for observation and further evaluation. During the 72‐h stay in the NICU, the neonate remained clinically stable. Initial laboratory tests revealed a platelet count of 112,000/μL and a Hb level of 16.9 g/dL. There were no episodes of bleeding or organ dysfunction. The infant was discharged in good health on the third day of life.
3. Discussion
The present study reports a case of refractory TTP diagnosed during the first trimester of pregnancy, focusing on the therapeutic approach and outcomes for the mother and fetus.
TTP is a rare but potentially life‐threatening disorder that may arise during pregnancy, posing substantial risks to maternal and fetal health. Unlike preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome—conditions specifically associated with pregnancy—TTP is often neglected, which can result in delayed diagnosis and intervention [7]. Notably, TTP may coexist with these conditions, as demonstrated by our patient's near‐term presentation with severe preeclampsia. The differentiation between TTP and other pregnancy‐associated microangiopathies is clinically challenging due to overlapping features [8]. TTP is characterized by severely reduced or absent ADAMST13 activity, leading to widespread microvascular thrombosis and organ dysfunction. Its clinical manifestations can vary from non‐specific symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnea to petechiae, renal impairment, and neurological deficits [9].
Diagnosis of TTP is based on clinical findings, particularly thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Definitive confirmation requires demonstrating reduced ADAMTS13 activity—mainly < 10%—and the presence of an ADAMTS13 inhibitor in an appropriate clinical setting. During the diagnostic process, excluding other autoimmune disorders, such as lupus, is essential. Routine ADAMTS13 testing is not an immediate diagnostic tool, as processing time can delay results and may not provide rapid clinical guidance [10]. Viral infections are recognized as prominent triggers for TTP, acting through mechanisms such as direct endothelial injury and the induction of autoantibodies against ADAMTS13 [11] The hypercoagulable state observed in COVID‐19 has also been linked to cytopathic endothelial damage, possibly mediated via entry through the ACE‐2 receptors [12].
In the case of our study, PLEX and corticosteroids were initiated after clinical suspicion of TTP, given the elevated risk of maternal and fetal mortality. Although there was an initial rise in platelet counts following PLEX treatment, their levels declined within a few days, according to the criteria for refractory TTP—defined as an absence of platelet response after 4 to 7 days of PLEX or a clinical deterioration in a patient receiving standard therapy [13]. Given potential teratogenic effects, monoclonal antibody therapy was withheld, and PLEX was continued prophylactically [14].
4. Literature Review
Post‐COVID‐19 TTP mostly affects women and tends to be refractory, with patients typically requiring an average of 12 sessions of PLEX per case [15]. Emerging data suggest that COVID‐19, similar to other viral infections, can trigger TTP through direct or immune‐mediated mechanisms [16]. Infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 is known to cause significant endothelial injury, giving rise to excessive release of vWF multimers. Furthermore, the inflammatory environment associated with COVID‐19 could promote the production of autoantibodies targeting ADAMTS13, the metalloprotease responsible for cleaving ultra‐large vWF multimers [17]. This dual mechanism—marked by elevated vWF levels and reduced ADAMTS13 activity—disrupts hemostatic balance and can result in microvascular thrombosis, a central feature of TTP. In a cross‐sectional study conducted by Mancini et al. [18] involving 50 patients, median vWF levels were significantly elevated in COVID‐19 patients, which correlated with the intensity of care required. In contrast, the ratio of hightolow molecular‐weight vWF multimers and median ADAMTS13 activity decreased as clinical severity increased. A systematic review by Chaudhary et al. [15] confirmed the association between decreased ADAMTS13 activity and COVID‐19 severity. Interestingly, Jole et al. [19] examined the conformational states of vWF and ADAMTS13 in critically ill COVID‐19 patients and found an elevated vWF/ADAMTS13 ratio at admission as a predictor of mortality. Altogether, these studies emphasize the importance of monitoring coagulation parameters in COVID‐19 patients and suggest that SARS‐CoV‐2 infection can trigger TTP in susceptible individuals.
Current treatment for TTP involves multiple sessions of PLEX. While response rates to PLEX have been reported to approach 100% [20], relapse remains a significant concern, affecting about 10% to 40% of patients. Those requiring more than 4–7 sessions are typically classified as refractory. Despite limited data on the safety of PLEX during pregnancy, existing evidence indicates that risks are similar to those in the non‐pregnant population. Common side effects of PLEX include chills (1.1%–8.8%), hives (0.7%–12%), and transfusion‐related allergic reactions. Additionally, patients may experience paresthesia due to hypocalcemia (1.5%–9%), headaches (0.3%–5%), and hypotension (0.4%–4.2%) [21].
Treatment protocols for TTP recommend PLEX as the first‐line treatment [8]. However, recent studies have highlighted the use of immunosuppressive agents and monoclonal antibodies in managing refractory cases. Scully et al. [22] reported that rituximab can be used safely during pregnancy. Likewise, existing research supports the use of caplacizumab, a nanobody targeting the A1 domain of vWF, which can inhibit its interaction with platelets and thereby mitigate microvascular thrombosis. When used in combination with PLEX and immunosuppressive therapy, caplacizumab has been shown to accelerate platelet count normalization and reduce the risk of TTP‐related complications and relapse [23]. However, in our case, caplacizumab was not administered due to the lack of sufficient safety data for its use during pregnancy. Instead, early onset of TTP during the first trimester was managed successfully with continuous PLEX, which resulted in favorable outcomes for both mother and the fetus [24].
5. Conclusion
This case study underscores the vital importance of early diagnosis and timely intervention in managing TTP during pregnancy, particularly in the rare situation of refractory TTP occurring in the first trimester. Given the heightened risk of life‐threatening complications for both the mother and fetus, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion when encountering signs of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia in pregnant patients. PLEX remains the cornerstone of treatment for TTP, and this case demonstrates its efficacy in achieving a platelet response—even in refractory cases. While monoclonal antibody therapies, such as rituximab and caplacizumab, are emerging as viable options for managing refractory TTP, their use in early pregnancy warrants careful consideration due to potential teratogenic risks. Taken together, continuous PLEX proved to be an effective treatment strategy, yielding favorable maternal and fetal outcomes. This case highlights the need for individualized treatment plans, careful monitoring, and multidisciplinary collaboration to improve prognosis in pregnant patients affected by TTP.
Author Contributions
Azadeh Shabani: conceptualization, methodology. Marjan Razi‐Khosroshahi: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing – review and editing. Hamide Rahmani Seraji: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Nafiseh Faghih: writing – original draft. Matin Hooshyar: investigation.
Consent
The patient gave written informed consent to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors have nothing to report.
Shabani A., Razi‐Khosroshahi M., Rahmani Seraji H., Faghih N., and Hooshyar M., “Can COVID‐19 Lead to Refractory Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) During Pregnancy and Postpartum? A Case Report and a Review of the Literature,” Clinical Case Reports 13, no. 9 (2025): e70878, 10.1002/ccr3.70878.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
- 1. Shiraji S. T., Rostami M. R., Foumani H. K., et al., “Clinical Features and Risk Factors of Relapse and Mortality in Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Patients: A Seven‐Year Experience,” International Journal of Hematology‐Oncology and Stem Cell Research 17, no. 3 (2023): 156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sikka P., Chopra S., Aggarwal N., Suri V., and Chandrasekaran A., “Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in the First Trimester of Pregnancy,” Asian Journal of Transfusion Science 7, no. 1 (2013): 79–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Middeldorp S., Coppens M., van Haaps T. F., et al., “Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients With COVID‐19,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 18, no. 8 (2020): 1995–2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tehrani H. A., Darnahal M., Vaezi M., and Haghighi S., “COVID‐19 Associated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP); A Case Series and Mini‐Review,” International Immunopharmacology 93 (2021): 107397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fyfe‐Brown A., Clarke G., Nerenberg K., Chandra S., and Jain V., “Management of Pregnancy‐Associated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Purpura,” American Journal of Perinatology Reports 3, no. 1 (2013): 45–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Joly B. S., Coppo P., and Veyradier A., “Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura,” Blood 129, no. 21 (2017): 2836–2846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gavriilaki E., Tsakiridis I., Kalmoukos P., et al., “A Rare Case of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura During Pregnancy With a Successful Outcome Despite Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome During Treatment,” Thrombosis Update 15 (2024): 100172. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pourrat O., Coudroy R., and Pierre F., “Differentiation Between Severe HELLP Syndrome and Thrombotic Microangiopathy, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Other Imitators,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 189 (2015): 68–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Goranta S., Deliwala S. S., Haykal T., and Bachuwa G., “Severe Primary Refractory Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) in the Post Plasma Exchange (PEX) and Rituximab Era,” BMJ Case Reports 13, no. 6 (2020): e234091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lee C.‐H., Huang Y.‐C., Li S.‐S., Hsu Y.‐T., Chen Y.‐P., and Chen T.‐Y., “Application of PLASMIC Score in Risk Prediction of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Real‐World Experience From a Tertiary Medical Center in Taiwan,” Frontiers in Medicine 9 (2022): 893273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. da Silva R. L., “Viral‐Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathies,” Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy 4, no. 2 (2011): 51–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fan B. E., Chong V. C. L., Chan S. S. W., et al., “Hematologic Parameters in Patients With COVID‐19 Infection,” American Journal of Hematology 95, no. 6 (2020): E131–E134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sayani F. A. and Abrams C. S., “How I Treat Refractory Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura,” Blood, the Journal of the American Society of Hematology 125, no. 25 (2015): 3860–3867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Perrotta K., Kiernan E., Bandoli G., Manaster R., and Chambers C., “Pregnancy Outcomes Following Maternal Treatment With Rituximab Prior to or During Pregnancy: A Case Series,” Rheumatology Advances in Practice 5, no. 1 (2021): rkaa074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chaudhary H., Nasir U., Syed K., et al., “COVID‐19‐Associated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Case Report and Systematic Review,” Hematology Reports 14, no. 3 (2022): 253–260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Alhomoud M., Alhobayb T., and Armitage K., “COVID‐19 Infection Triggering Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura,” IDCases 26 (2021): e01256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Fujimura Y. and Holland L. Z., “COVID‐19 Microthrombosis: Unusually Large VWF Multimers Are a Platform for Activation of the Alternative Complement Pathway Under Cytokine Storm,” International Journal of Hematology 115, no. 4 (2022): 457–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mancini I., Baronciani L., Artoni A., et al., “The ADAMTS13‐von Willebrand Factor Axis in COVID‐19 Patients,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 19, no. 2 (2021): 513–521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Joly B. S., Darmon M., Dekimpe C., et al., “Imbalance of von Willebrand Factor and ADAMTS13 Axis Is Rather a Biomarker of Strong Inflammation and Endothelial Damage Than a Cause of Thrombotic Process in Critically Ill COVID‐19 Patients,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 19, no. 9 (2021): 2193–2198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Froissart A., Buffet M., Veyradier A., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of First‐Line Rituximab in Severe, Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura With a Suboptimal Response to Plasma Exchange. Experience of the French Thrombotic Microangiopathies Reference Center,” Critical Care Medicine 40, no. 1 (2012): 104–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wind M., Gaasbeek A., Oosten L., et al., “Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pregnancy: A Literature Review,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 260 (2021): 29–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Scully M., Thomas M., Underwood M., et al., “Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Pregnancy: Presentation, Management, and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes,” Blood 124, no. 2 (2014): 211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Knoebl P., Cataland S., Peyvandi F., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Open‐Label Caplacizumab in Patients With Exacerbations of Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in the HERCULES Study,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 18, no. 2 (2020): 479–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kiamos A., Boldig K., and Reddy P., “Refractory Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura to Therapeutic Plasma Exchange,” Cureus 14, no. 9 (2022): e29562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
