Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2003 Dec;111(16):1855–1860. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6267

Strategies for setting a national research agenda that is responsive to community needs.

Liam R O'Fallon 1, Geraldine M Wolfle 1, David Brown 1, Allen Dearry 1, Kenneth Olden 1
PMCID: PMC1241757  PMID: 14644657

Abstract

Setting a national environmental health research agenda requires broad public input, including that from leading scientists, health care professionals, and communities. Contributions from these diverse constituencies are essential to formulating a research and education strategy that both advances our understanding of the causes and mechanisms of environmentally related diseases and translates such findings into effective prevention and clinical applications to protect those most affected by adverse environmental exposures. Given the increasing number of individual researchers working with communities to address environmental health needs during the past decade, it is also essential for research institutions to foster relationships with communities to understand and respond to their unique public health needs, as well as to communicate research advances in a manner that is both understandable and culturally appropriate. To achieve broad public input and to foster community-university partnerships, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) supports various workshops, roundtables, and advisory groups. In particular, the NIEHS finds Town Meetings to be a successful model for bringing academic researchers together with community residents, state and local departments of health, and community-based organizations to foster greater awareness of community needs, public health needs, and environmental health science research. Since 1998, the NIEHS has supported 16 Town Meetings across the country. In this article we highlight the major outcomes of these meetings to demonstrate the effectiveness of this mechanism for enhancing cooperation among researchers, community residents, and public health officials with the goal of improving public health and setting a national research agenda.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (125.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonham Vence L., Nathan Vincent R. Environmental public health research: engaging communities. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Mar;205(1-2):11–18. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Freudenberg N. Case history of the Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies in New York City. J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):508–518. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gilliland F. D., Berhane K., Rappaport E. B., Thomas D. C., Avol E., Gauderman W. J., London S. J., Margolis H. G., McConnell R., Islam K. T. The effects of ambient air pollution on school absenteeism due to respiratory illnesses. Epidemiology. 2001 Jan;12(1):43–54. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200101000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Israel B. A., Schulz A. J., Parker E. A., Becker A. B. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kinney P. L., Aggarwal M., Northridge M. E., Janssen N. A., Shepard P. Airborne concentrations of PM(2.5) and diesel exhaust particles on Harlem sidewalks: a community-based pilot study. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):213–218. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koné A., Sullivan M., Senturia K. D., Chrisman N. J., Ciske S. J., Krieger J. W. Improving collaboration between researchers and communities. Public Health Rep. 2000 Mar-Jun;115(2-3):243–248. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krieger James, Allen Carol, Cheadle Allen, Ciske Sandra, Schier James K., Senturia Kirsten, Sullivan Marianne. Using community-based participatory research to address social determinants of health: lessons learned from Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities. Health Educ Behav. 2002 Jun;29(3):361–382. doi: 10.1177/109019810202900307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCauley L. A., Beltran M., Phillips J., Lasarev M., Sticker D. The Oregon migrant farmworker community: an evolving model for participatory research. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Jun;109 (Suppl 3):449–455. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s3449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Northridge M. E., Yankura J., Kinney P. L., Santella R. M., Shepard P., Riojas Y., Aggarwal M., Strickland P. Diesel exhaust exposure among adolescents in Harlem: a community-driven study. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):998–1002. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. O'Fallon L. R., Dearry A. Commitment of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to community-based participatory research for rural health. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Jun;109 (Suppl 3):469–473. doi: 10.1289/ehp.109-1240567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Olden K. Bringing science back to the neighborhood. Science. 1993 Nov 12;262(5136):1116–1116. doi: 10.1126/science.8235631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES