Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2004 Jan;112(1):79–86. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6262

Prospective pregnancy study designs for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicants.

Germaine M Buck 1, Courtney D Lynch 1, Joseph B Stanford 1, Anne M Sweeney 1, Laura A Schieve 1, John C Rockett 1, Sherry G Selevan 1, Steven M Schrader 1
PMCID: PMC1241801  PMID: 14698935

Abstract

The determinants of successful human reproduction and development may act as early as periconceptionally, underscoring the need to capture exposures during these critical windows when assessing potential toxicants. To identify such toxicants, couples must be studied longitudinally prior to conception without regard to a couple's ability to ascertain a clinically recognized pregnancy. We examined the utility and feasibility of prospective pregnancy study designs by conducting a systematic review of the literature to summarize relevant information regarding the planning, implementation, and success of previously published prospective pregnancy studies. Information concerning design elements and participation was abstracted from 15 eligible studies (from a total of 20 identified studies) using a standardized form. The primary author of each study was contacted to review our summary of their work and obtain missing information. Our findings confirm the ability to recruit women/couples from diverse populations using a variety of recruitment strategies. Among the studies we reviewed, 4-97% of eligible individuals were successfully contacted, with enrollment rates ranging from 42 to 100%. Length of follow-up varied from 3 to 12 months. A high percentage of women provided urine (57-98%) and blood (86-91%) specimens and most male partners (94-100%) provided semen samples. These data support the feasibility of this design.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams M. Validity of birth certificate data for the outcome of the previous pregnancy, Georgia, 1980-1995. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Nov 15;154(10):883–888. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.10.883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson S. W., Niklasson A., Lapidus L., Hallberg L., Bengtsson C., Hulthén L. Poor agreement between self-reported birth weight and birth weight from original records in adult women. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Oct 1;152(7):609–616. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.7.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anwar W. A. Chemical interaction: enhancement and inhibition of clastogenicity. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Oct;101 (Suppl 3):203–206. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s3203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck Laurie F., Morrow Brian, Lipscomb Leslie E., Johnson Christopher H., Gaffield Mary E., Rogers Mary, Gilbert Brenda Colley. Prevalence of selected maternal behaviors and experiences, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1999. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Apr 26;51(2):1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Behre H. M., Kuhlage J., Gassner C., Sonntag B., Schem C., Schneider H. P., Nieschlag E. Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod. 2000 Dec;15(12):2478–2482. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.12.2478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benziger D. P., Edelson J. Absorption from the vagina. Drug Metab Rev. 1983;14(2):137–168. doi: 10.3109/03602538308991387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonde J. P., Hjollund N. H., Jensen T. K., Ernst E., Kolstad H., Henriksen T. B., Giwercman A., Skakkebaek N. E., Andersson A. M., Olsen J. A follow-up study of environmental and biologic determinants of fertility among 430 Danish first-pregnancy planners: design and methods. Reprod Toxicol. 1998 Jan-Feb;12(1):19–27. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(97)00096-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown J. E., Jacobs D. R., Jr, Barosso G. M., Potter J. D., Hannan P. J., Kopher R. A., Rourke M. J., Hartman T. J., Hase K. Recruitment, retention and characteristics of women in a prospective study of preconceptional risks to reproductive outcomes: experience of the Diana Project. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997 Jul;11(3):345–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1997.tb00013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chapin Robert E., Robbins Wendie A., Schieve Laura A., Sweeney Anne M., Tabacova Sonia A., Tomashek Kay M. Off to a good start: the influence of pre- and periconceptional exposures, parental fertility, and nutrition on children's health. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jan;112(1):69–78. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ehrenkranz Joel R. L. Home and point-of-care pregnancy tests: a review of the technology. Epidemiology. 2002 May;13 (Suppl 3):S15–S18. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200205001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellish N. J., Saboda K., O'Connor J., Nasca P. C., Stanek E. J., Boyle C. A prospective study of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 1996 Feb;11(2):406–412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.2.406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eskenazi B., Gold E. B., Samuels S. J., Wight S., Lasley B. L., Hammond S. K., O'Neill Rasor M., Schenker M. B. Prospective assessment of fecundability of female semiconductor workers. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Dec;28(6):817–831. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700280614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Faber Daniel R., Krieg Eric J. Unequal exposure to ecological hazards: environmental injustices in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 (Suppl 2):277–288. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fehring R. J., Schlaff W. D. Accuracy of the Ovulon fertility monitor to predict and detect ovulation. J Nurse Midwifery. 1998 Mar-Apr;43(2):117–120. doi: 10.1016/s0091-2182(97)00151-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. France J. T., Graham F. M., Gosling L., Hair P. I. A prospective study of the preselection of the sex of offspring by timing intercourse relative to ovulation. Fertil Steril. 1984 Jun;41(6):894–900. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47904-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Golding J., Pembrey M., Jones R., ALSPAC Study Team ALSPAC--the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001 Jan;15(1):74–87. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grimes David A., Schulz Kenneth F. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):248–252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hakim R. B., Gray R. H., Zacur H. Infertility and early pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;172(5):1510–1517. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90489-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Henshaw S. K. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hilgers T. W., Abraham G. E., Cavanagh D. Natural family planning. I. The peak symptom and estimated time of ovulation. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Nov;52(5):575–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Joyce T. J., Kaestner R., Korenman S. The effect of pregnancy intention on child development. Demography. 2000 Feb;37(1):83–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaufmann R. B., Morris L., Spitz A. M. Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 May 1;145(9):810–816. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klerman L. V. The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition. Matern Child Health J. 2000 Sep;4(3):155–162. doi: 10.1023/a:1009534612388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kost K., Landry D. J., Darroch J. E. Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter? Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Mar-Apr;30(2):79–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lay M. F., Richardson M. E., Boone W. R., Bodine A. B., Thurston R. J. Seminal plasma and IVF potential. Biochemical constituents of seminal plasma of males from in vitro fertilization couples. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Mar;18(3):144–150. doi: 10.1023/A:1009420306173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li De-Kun, Odouli Roxana, Wi Soora, Janevic Teresa, Golditch Ira, Bracken T. Dan, Senior Russell, Rankin Richard, Iriye Richard. A population-based prospective cohort study of personal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. Epidemiology. 2002 Jan;13(1):9–20. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li Hongxia, Chen Jiangang, Overstreet James W., Nakajima Steven T., Lasley Bill L. Urinary follicle-stimulating hormone peak as a biomarker for estimating the day of ovulation. Fertil Steril. 2002 May;77(5):961–966. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)02998-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luker K. C. A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):248–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lum A., Le Marchand L. A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998 Aug;7(8):719–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McCauley L. A. Chemical mixtures in the workplace. Research and practice. AAOHN J. 1998 Jan;46(1):29–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller J. F., Williamson E., Glue J., Gordon Y. B., Grudzinskas J. G., Sykes A. Fetal loss after implantation. A prospective study. Lancet. 1980 Sep 13;2(8194):554–556. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91991-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moore J. A., Daston G. P., Faustman E., Golub M. S., Hart W. L., Hughes C., Jr, Kimmel C. A., Lamb J. C., 4th, Schwetz B. A., Scialli A. R. An evaluative process for assessing human reproductive and developmental toxicity of agents. Reprod Toxicol. 1995 Jan-Feb;9(1):61–95. doi: 10.1016/0890-6238(94)00057-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Morello-Frosch Rachel, Pastor Manuel, Jr, Porras Carlos, Sadd James. Environmental justice and regional inequality in southern California: implications for future research. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 (Suppl 2):149–154. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nielsen M. S., Barton S. D., Hatasaka H. H., Stanford J. B. Comparison of several one-step home urinary luteinizing hormone detection test kits to OvuQuick. Fertil Steril. 2001 Aug;76(2):384–387. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01881-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ostermeier G. Charles, Dix David J., Miller David, Khatri Purvesh, Krawetz Stephen A. Spermatozoal RNA profiles of normal fertile men. Lancet. 2002 Sep 7;360(9335):772–777. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09899-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Piccinino L. J., Mosher W. D. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):4-10, 46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reichman N. E., Hade E. M. Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey's HealthStart program. Ann Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;11(3):186–193. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00209-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Royster M. O., Lobdell D. T., Mendola P., Perreault S. D., Selevan S. G., Rothmann S. A., Robbins W. A. Evaluation of a container for collection and shipment of semen with potential uses in population-based, clinical, and occupational settings. J Androl. 2000 May-Jun;21(3):478–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sable M. R. Pregnancy intentions may not be a useful measure for research on maternal and child health outcomes. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):249–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sandberg F., Ingelman-Sundberg A., Rydén G., Joelsson I. The absorption of tritium-labelled prostaglandin E1 from the vagina of non-pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1968;47(1):22–26. doi: 10.3109/00016346809157462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanders K. A., Bruce N. W. A prospective study of psychosocial stress and fertility in women. Hum Reprod. 1997 Oct;12(10):2324–2329. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Selevan S. G., Kimmel C. A., Mendola P. Identifying critical windows of exposure for children's health. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108 (Suppl 3):451–455. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shavers Vickie L., Lynch Charles F., Burmeister Leon F. Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2002 May;12(4):248–256. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00265-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Siega-Riz A. M., Herrmann T. S., Savitz D. A., Thorp J. M. Frequency of eating during pregnancy and its effect on preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Apr 1;153(7):647–652. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.7.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Silverman William A. Vital decisions. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003 Jan;17(1):1–2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stanford Joseph B., White George L., Hatasaka Harry. Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;100(6):1333–1341. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02382-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sweeney A. M., Meyer M. R., Aarons J. H., Mills J. L., LaPorte R. E. Evaluation of methods for the prospective identification of early fetal losses in environmental epidemiology studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Apr;127(4):843–850. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sweeney A. M., Meyer M. R., Mills J. L., Aarons J. H., LaPorte R. E. Evaluation of recruitment strategies for prospective studies of spontaneous abortion. J Occup Med. 1989 Dec;31(12):980–985. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198912000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Till Christine, Koren Gideon, Rovet Joanne F. Agreement between prospective and retrospective reports of maternal exposure to chemicals during pregnancy. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Aug;44(8):708–713. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200208000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tingen Candace, Stanford Joseph B., Dunson David B. Methodologic and statistical approaches to studying human fertility and environmental exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jan;112(1):87–93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Trussell J., Vaughan B., Stanford J. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):246-7, 260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vartiainen H., Saarikoski S., Halonen P., Rimón R. Psychosocial factors, female fertility and pregnancy: a prospective study--Part I: Fertility. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Jun;15(2):67–75. doi: 10.3109/01674829409025631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang Xiaobin, Chen Changzhong, Wang Lihua, Chen Dafang, Guang Wenwei, French Jonathan. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2003 Mar;79(3):577–584. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04694-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Werler M. M., Pober B. R., Nelson K., Holmes L. B. Reporting accuracy among mothers of malformed and nonmalformed infants. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Feb;129(2):415–421. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilcox A. J., Baird D. D., Dunson D., McChesney R., Weinberg C. R. Natural limits of pregnancy testing in relation to the expected menstrual period. JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1759–1761. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilcox A. J., Weinberg C. R., O'Connor J. F., Baird D. D., Schlatterer J. P., Canfield R. E., Armstrong E. G., Nisula B. C. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jul 28;319(4):189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wilson Sacoby M., Howell Frank, Wing Steve, Sobsey Mark. Environmental injustice and the Mississippi hog industry. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 (Suppl 2):195–201. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Worthman C. M., Stallings J. F. Hormone measures in finger-prick blood spot samples: new field methods for reproductive endocrinology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997 Sep;104(1):1–21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199709)104:1<1::AID-AJPA1>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wyatt Katrina M., Dimmock Paul W., Hayes-Gill Barrie, Crowe John, O'Brien P. M. Shaughn. Menstrual symptometrics: a simple computer-aided method to quantify menstrual cycle disorders. Fertil Steril. 2002 Jul;78(1):96–101. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Younglai E. V., Foster W. G., Hughes E. G., Trim K., Jarrell J. F. Levels of environmental contaminants in human follicular fluid, serum, and seminal plasma of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002 Jul;43(1):121–126. doi: 10.1007/s00244-001-0048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zinaman M. J., Brown C. C., Selevan S. G., Clegg E. D. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. J Androl. 2000 Jan-Feb;21(1):145–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zinaman M. J., Clegg E. D., Brown C. C., O'Connor J., Selevan S. G. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 1996 Mar;65(3):503–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. de Mouzon J., Spira A., Schwartz D. A prospective study of the relation between smoking and fertility. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Jun;17(2):378–384. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.2.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES