Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2004 Jan;112(1):87–93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6263

Methodologic and statistical approaches to studying human fertility and environmental exposure.

Candace Tingen 1, Joseph B Stanford 1, David B Dunson 1
PMCID: PMC1241802  PMID: 14698936

Abstract

Although there has been growing concern about the effects of environmental exposures on human fertility, standard epidemiologic study designs may not collect sufficient data to identify subtle effects while properly adjusting for confounding. In particular, results from conventional time to pregnancy studies can be driven by the many sources of bias inherent in these studies. By prospectively collecting detailed records of menstrual bleeding, occurrences of intercourse, and a marker of ovulation day in each menstrual cycle, precise information on exposure effects can be obtained, adjusting for many of the primary sources of bias. This article provides an overview of the different types of study designs, focusing on the data required, the practical advantages and disadvantages of each design, and the statistical methods required to take full advantage of the available data. We conclude that detailed prospective studies allowing inferences on day-specific probabilities of conception should be considered as the gold standard for studying the effects of environmental exposures on fertility.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdalla H. I., Wren M. E., Thomas A., Korea L. Age of the uterus does not affect pregnancy or implantation rates; a study of egg donation in women of different ages sharing oocytes from the same donor. Hum Reprod. 1997 Apr;12(4):827–829. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.4.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amann R. P. Use of animal models for detecting specific alterations in reproduction. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1982 Jan-Feb;2(1):13–26. doi: 10.1016/s0272-0590(82)80059-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Apostoli P., Bellini A., Porru S., Bisanti L. The effect of lead on male fertility: a time to pregnancy (TTP) study. Am J Ind Med. 2000 Sep;38(3):310–315. doi: 10.1002/1097-0274(200009)38:3<310::aid-ajim10>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baird D. D. Using time-to-pregnancy data to study occupational exposures: methodology. Reprod Toxicol. 1988;2(3-4):205–207. doi: 10.1016/0890-6238(88)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baird D. D., Weinberg C. R., Wilcox A. J., McConnaughey D. R., Musey P. I. Using the ratio of urinary oestrogen and progesterone metabolites to estimate day of ovulation. Stat Med. 1991 Feb;10(2):255–266. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baird D. D., Weinberg C. R., Zhou H., Kamel F., McConnaughey D. R., Kesner J. S., Wilcox A. J. Preimplantation urinary hormone profiles and the probability of conception in healthy women. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jan;71(1):40–49. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00419-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baird D. D., Wilcox A. J., Weinberg C. R. Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;124(3):470–480. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnhart K., Osheroff J. Follicle stimulating hormone as a predictor of fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;10(3):227–232. doi: 10.1097/00001703-199806000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berardono B., Melani D., Ranaldi F., Giachetti E., Vanni P. Is the salivary "ferning" a reliable index of the fertile period? Acta Eur Fertil. 1993 Mar-Apr;24(2):61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boldsen J. L., Schaumburg I. Time to pregnancy--a model and its application. J Biosoc Sci. 1990 Apr;22(2):255–262. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000018587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bonde J. P., Hjollund N. H., Jensen T. K., Ernst E., Kolstad H., Henriksen T. B., Giwercman A., Skakkebaek N. E., Andersson A. M., Olsen J. A follow-up study of environmental and biologic determinants of fertility among 430 Danish first-pregnancy planners: design and methods. Reprod Toxicol. 1998 Jan-Feb;12(1):19–27. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(97)00096-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Buck G. M., Vena J. E., Schisterman E. F., Dmochowski J., Mendola P., Sever L. E., Fitzgerald E., Kostyniak P., Greizerstein H., Olson J. Parental consumption of contaminated sport fish from Lake Ontario and predicted fecundability. Epidemiology. 2000 Jul;11(4):388–393. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200007000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carlsen E., Giwercman A., Keiding N., Skakkebaek N. E. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):609–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cavanagh A. C. Identification of early pregnancy factor as chaperonin 10: implications for understanding its role. Rev Reprod. 1996 Jan;1(1):28–32. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0010028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandra A., Stephen E. H. Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):34–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chapin Robert E., Robbins Wendie A., Schieve Laura A., Sweeney Anne M., Tabacova Sonia A., Tomashek Kay M. Off to a good start: the influence of pre- and periconceptional exposures, parental fertility, and nutrition on children's health. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jan;112(1):69–78. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Curtis K. M., Savitz D. A., Arbuckle T. E. Effects of cigarette smoking, caffeine consumption, and alcohol intake on fecundability. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Jul 1;146(1):32–41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Curtis K. M., Savitz D. A., Weinberg C. R., Arbuckle T. E. The effect of pesticide exposure on time to pregnancy. Epidemiology. 1999 Mar;10(2):112–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunson D. B. Bayesian modeling of the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Biometrics. 2001 Dec;57(4):1067–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunson D. B., Perreault S. D. Factor analytic models of clustered multivariate data with informative censoring. Biometrics. 2001 Mar;57(1):302–308. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dunson D. B., Sinai I., Colombo B. The relationship between cervical secretions and the daily probabilities of pregnancy: effectiveness of the TwoDay Algorithm. Hum Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2278–2282. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dunson D. B., Weinberg C. R. Accounting for unreported and missing intercourse in human fertility studies. Stat Med. 2000 Mar 15;19(5):665–679. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000315)19:5<665::aid-sim391>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dunson D. B., Weinberg C. R., Baird D. D., Kesner J. S., Wilcox A. J. Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation. Stat Med. 2001 Mar 30;20(6):965–978. doi: 10.1002/sim.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunson David B., Colombo Bernardo, Baird Donna D. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2002 May;17(5):1399–1403. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dunson David B., Neelon Brian. Bayesian inference on order-constrained parameters in generalized linear models. Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):286–295. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Eaton William. The logic for a conception-to-death cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;12(7):445–451. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00314-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eisenberg D. M., Kessler R. C., Foster C., Norlock F. E., Calkins D. R., Delbanco T. L. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):246–252. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gnoth C., Godehardt D., Godehardt E., Frank-Herrmann P., Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1959–1966. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guida M., Tommaselli G. A., Palomba S., Pellicano M., Moccia G., Di Carlo C., Nappi C. Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program. Fertil Steril. 1999 Nov;72(5):900–904. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00365-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hakim R. B., Gray R. H., Zacur H. Alcohol and caffeine consumption and decreased fertility. Fertil Steril. 1998 Oct;70(4):632–637. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00257-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Henriksen T. B., Baird D. D., Olsen J., Hedegaard M., Secher N. J., Wilcox A. J. Time to pregnancy and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):594–599. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Henshaw S. K. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hilgers T. W., Daly K. D., Prebil A. M., Hilgers S. K. Cumulative pregnancy rates in patients with apparently normal fertility and fertility-focused intercourse. J Reprod Med. 1992 Oct;37(10):864–866. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hilgers T. W., Prebil A. M. The ovulation method--vulvar observations as an index of fertility/infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jan;53(1):12–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Joffe M., Li Z. Association of time to pregnancy and the outcome of pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1994 Jul;62(1):71–75. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56818-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Joffe M., Villard L., Li Z., Plowman R., Vessey M. Long-term recall of time-to-pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1993 Jul;60(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56044-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Joffe Michael. Invited commentary: the potential for monitoring of fecundity and the remaining challenges. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan 15;157(2):89–93. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Juul S., Keiding N., Tvede M. Retrospectively sampled time-to-pregnancy data may make age-decreasing fecundity look increasing. European Infertility and Subfecundity Study Group. Epidemiology. 2000 Nov;11(6):717–719. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200011000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Katz D. F. Human cervical mucus: research update. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;165(6 Pt 2):1984–1986. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90559-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kidd S. A., Eskenazi B., Wyrobek A. J. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2001 Feb;75(2):237–248. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01679-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Larsen S. B., Joffe M., Bonde J. P. Time to pregnancy and exposure to pesticides in Danish farmers. ASCLEPIOS Study Group. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Apr;55(4):278–283. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.4.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Linn S., Schoenbaum S. C., Monson R. R., Rosner B., Ryan K. J. Delay in conception for former 'pill' users. JAMA. 1982 Feb 5;247(5):629–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller W. B. Reproductive decisions: how we make them and how they make us. Adv Popul. 1994;2:1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mitchell Allen A. Infertility treatment--more risks and challenges. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 7;346(10):769–770. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200203073461011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Morabia A., Costanza M. C. International variability in ages at menarche, first livebirth, and menopause. World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Dec 15;148(12):1195–1205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. O'Connell M., Rogers C. C. Differential fertility in the United States: 1976-1980. Fam Plann Perspect. 1982 Sep-Oct;14(5):281-4, 286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Olsen Jørn, Rachootin Pamela. Invited commentary: monitoring fecundity over time--if we do it, then let's do it right. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan 15;157(2):94–97. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pearce D., Cantisani G., Laihonen A. Changes in fertility and family sizes in Europe. Popul Trends. 1999 Spring;(95):33–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ridout M. S., Morgan B. J. Modelling digit preference in fecundability studies. Biometrics. 1991 Dec;47(4):1423–1433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rosenwaks Z., Davis O. K., Damario M. A. The role of maternal age in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 1995 Oct;10 (Suppl 1):165–173. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Royston J. P. Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics. 1982 Jun;38(2):397–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Royston P., Ferreira A. A new approach to modeling daily probabilities of conception. Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):1005–1013. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.01005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rutledge J. C., Generoso W. M., Shourbaji A., Cain K. T., Gans M., Oliva J. Developmental anomalies derived from exposure of zygotes and first-cleavage embryos to mutagens. Mutat Res. 1992 Dec;296(1-2):167–177. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(92)90040-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sallmén M., Anttila A., Lindbohm M. L., Kyyrönen P., Taskinen H., Hemminki K. Time to pregnancy among women occupationally exposed to lead. J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Aug;37(8):931–934. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199508000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sallmén M., Lindbohm M. L., Anttila A., Kyyrönen P., Taskinen H., Nykyri E., Hemminki K. Time to pregnancy among the wives of men exposed to organic solvents. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Jan;55(1):24–30. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.1.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sauer M. V. The impact of age on reproductive potential: lessons learned from oocyte donation. Maturitas. 1998 Oct 12;30(2):221–225. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(98)00077-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Scheike T. H., Jensen T. K. A discrete survival model with random effects: an application to time to pregnancy. Biometrics. 1997 Mar;53(1):318–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schwartz D., Mayaux M. J. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 18;306(7):404–406. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202183060706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Scott R. T., Jr, Hofmann G. E. Prognostic assessment of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 1995 Jan;63(1):1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Stanford Joseph B., Smith Ken R., Dunson David B. Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;101(6):1285–1293. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00358-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stanford Joseph B., White George L., Hatasaka Harry. Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;100(6):1333–1341. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02382-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Stovall D. W., Toma S. K., Hammond M. G., Talbert L. M. The effect of age on female fecundity. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan;77(1):33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Swan S. H., Elkin E. P., Fenster L. The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934-1996. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Oct;108(10):961–966. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Thonneau P., Abell A., Larsen S. B., Bonde J. P., Joffe M., Clavert A., Ducot B., Multigner L., Danscher G. Effects of pesticide exposure on time to pregnancy: results of a multicenter study in France and Denmark. ASCLEPIOS Study Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jul 15;150(2):157–163. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Trussell J., Vaughan B., Stanford J. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):246-7, 260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ventura S. J., Martin J. A., Curtin S. C., Mathews T. J., Park M. M. Births: final data for 1998. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2000 Mar 28;48(3):1–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ventura S. J., Mosher W. D., Curtin S. C., Abma J. C., Henshaw S. Trends in pregnancy rates for the United States, 1976-97: an update. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001 Jun 6;49(4):1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Verweij P. J., van Houwelingen H. C. Time-dependent effects of fixed covariates in Cox regression. Biometrics. 1995 Dec;51(4):1550–1556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Waller K., Reim J., Fenster L., Swan S. H., Brumback B., Windham G. C., Lasley B., Ettinger B., Marcus R. Bone mass and subtle abnormalities in ovulatory function in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996 Feb;81(2):663–668. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.2.8636286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang Xiaobin, Chen Changzhong, Wang Lihua, Chen Dafang, Guang Wenwei, French Jonathan. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2003 Mar;79(3):577–584. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04694-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Weinberg C. R., Baird D. D., Rowland A. S. Pitfalls inherent in retrospective time-to-event studies: the example of time to pregnancy. Stat Med. 1993 May 15;12(9):867–879. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780120906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Weinberg C. R., Baird D. D., Wilcox A. J. Sources of bias in studies of time to pregnancy. 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15Stat Med. 13(5-7):671–681. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Weinberg C. R., Gladen B. C. The beta-geometric distribution applied to comparative fecundability studies. Biometrics. 1986 Sep;42(3):547–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Weinberg C. R., Gladen B. C., Wilcox A. J. Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby. Biometrics. 1994 Jun;50(2):358–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Weinberg C. R., Wilcox A. J. A model for estimating the potency and survival of human gametes in vivo. Biometrics. 1995 Jun;51(2):405–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Weinberg C. R., Wilcox A. J., Baird D. D. Reduced fecundability in women with prenatal exposure to cigarette smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 May;129(5):1072–1078. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wennborg H., Bodin L., Vainio H., Axelsson G. Solvent use and time to pregnancy among female personnel in biomedical laboratories in Sweden. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Apr;58(4):225–231. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.4.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wilcox A. J., Dunson D., Baird D. D. The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ. 2000 Nov 18;321(7271):1259–1262. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wilcox A. J., Weinberg C. R., O'Connor J. F., Baird D. D., Schlatterer J. P., Canfield R. E., Armstrong E. G., Nisula B. C. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jul 28;319(4):189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wilcox A. J., Weinberg C. R., Wehmann R. E., Armstrong E. G., Canfield R. E., Nisula B. C. Measuring early pregnancy loss: laboratory and field methods. Fertil Steril. 1985 Sep;44(3):366–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wilcox A., Weinberg C., Baird D. Caffeinated beverages and decreased fertility. Lancet. 1988 Dec 24;2(8626-8627):1453–1456. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90933-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Williams M. A., Goldman M. B., Mittendorf R., Monson R. R. Subfertility and the risk of low birth weight. Fertil Steril. 1991 Oct;56(4):668–671. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54597-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Working P. K. Male reproductive toxicology: comparison of the human to animal models. Environ Health Perspect. 1988 Apr;77:37–44. doi: 10.1289/ehp.887737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhou H., Weinberg C. R. Modeling conception as an aggregated Bernoulli outcome with latent variables via the EM algorithm. Biometrics. 1996 Sep;52(3):945–954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. van Noord-Zaadstra B. M., Looman C. W., Alsbach H., Habbema J. D., te Velde E. R., Karbaat J. Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ. 1991 Jun 8;302(6789):1361–1365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6789.1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES