Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2004 Mar;112(3):321–326. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6667

Glyphosate biomonitoring for farmers and their families: results from the Farm Family Exposure Study.

John F Acquavella 1, Bruce H Alexander 1, Jack S Mandel 1, Christophe Gustin 1, Beth Baker 1, Pamela Chapman 1, Marian Bleeke 1
PMCID: PMC1241861  PMID: 14998747

Abstract

Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup agricultural herbicides and other herbicide formulations that are widely used for agricultural, forestry, and residential weed control. As part of the Farm Family Exposure Study, we evaluated urinary glyphosate concentrations for 48 farmers, their spouses, and their 79 children (4-18 years of age). We evaluated 24-hr composite urine samples for each family member the day before, the day of, and for 3 days after a glyphosate application. Sixty percent of farmers had detectable levels of glyphosate in their urine on the day of application. The geometric mean (GM) concentration was 3 ppb, the maximum value was 233 ppb, and the highest estimated systemic dose was 0.004 mg/kg. Farmers who did not use rubber gloves had higher GM urinary concentrations than did other farmers (10 ppb vs. 2.0 ppb). For spouses, 4% had detectable levels in their urine on the day of application. Their maximum value was 3 ppb. For children, 12% had detectable glyphosate in their urine on the day of application, with a maximum concentration of 29 ppb. All but one of the children with detectable concentrations had helped with the application or were present during herbicide mixing, loading, or application. None of the systemic doses estimated in this study approached the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference dose for glyphosate of 2 mg/kg/day. Nonetheless, it is advisable to minimize exposure to pesticides, and this study did identify specific practices that could be modified to reduce the potential for exposure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (125.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alavanja M. C., Sandler D. P., McDonnell C. J., Lynch C. F., Pennybacker M., Zahm S. H., Mage D. T., Steen W. C., Wintersteen W., Blair A. Characteristics of pesticide use in a pesticide applicator cohort: the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Res. 1999 Feb;80(2 Pt 1):172–179. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alavanja M. C., Sandler D. P., McMaster S. B., Zahm S. H., McDonnell C. J., Lynch C. F., Pennybacker M., Rothman N., Dosemeci M., Bond A. E. The Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Apr;104(4):362–369. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gladen B. C., Sandler D. P., Zahm S. H., Kamel F., Rowland A. S., Alavanja M. C. Exposure opportunities of families of farmer pesticide applicators. Am J Ind Med. 1998 Dec;34(6):581–587. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199812)34:6<581::aid-ajim6>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jauhiainen A., Räsänen K., Sarantila R., Nuutinen J., Kangas J. Occupational exposure of forest workers to glyphosate during brush saw spraying work. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991 Feb;52(2):61–64. doi: 10.1080/15298669191364334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lavy T. L., Cowell J. E., Steinmetz J. R., Massey J. H. Conifer seedling nursery worker exposure to glyphosate. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992 Jan;22(1):6–13. doi: 10.1007/BF00213295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wester R. C., Melendres J., Sarason R., McMaster J., Maibach H. I. Glyphosate skin binding, absorption, residual tissue distribution, and skin decontamination. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1991 May;16(4):725–732. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(91)90158-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Williams G. M., Kroes R., Munro I. C. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000 Apr;31(2 Pt 1):117–165. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES