Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2004 Mar;112(4):417–419. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6674

Toxicogenomics in risk assessment: an overview of an HESI collaborative research program.

William Pennie 1, Syril D Pettit 1, Peter G Lord 1
PMCID: PMC1241893  PMID: 15033589

Abstract

The value of genomic approaches in hypothesis generation is being realized as a tool for understanding toxicity and consequently contributing to an assessment of drug and chemical safety. In 1999 the membership of the International Life Sciences Institute Health and Environmental Sciences Institute formed a committee to develop a collaborative scientific program to address issues, challenges, and opportunities afforded by the emerging field of toxicogenomics. Experts and advisors from academia and government laboratories participate on the committee, along with approximately 30 corporate member organizations from the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, chemical, and consumer products industries. The committee has designed, conducted, and analyzed numerous toxicogenomic experiments within the broad fields of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and genotoxicity. The considerable body of data generated by these programs has been instrumental in increasing understanding of sources of biological and technical variability in the alignment of toxicant-induced transcription changes with the accepted mechanism of action of these agents and the challenges in the consistent analysis and sharing of the voluminous data sets generated by these approaches. Recognizing the importance of standardized microarray data formats and public repository databases as the mechanism by which microarray data can be compared and interpreted by the scientific community, the committee has partnered with the European Bioinformatics Institute to develop a database to house the data generated by its collaborative research.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amin Rupesh P., Vickers Alison E., Sistare Frank, Thompson Karol L., Roman Richard J., Lawton Michael, Kramer Jeffrey, Hamadeh Hisham K., Collins Jennifer, Grissom Sherry. Identification of putative gene based markers of renal toxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):465–479. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker Valerie A., Harries Helen M., Waring Jeff F., Duggan Colette M., Ni Hong A., Jolly Robert A., Yoon Lawrence W., De Souza Angus T., Schmid Judith E., Brown Roger H. Clofibrate-induced gene expression changes in rat liver: a cross-laboratory analysis using membrane cDNA arrays. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):428–438. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brazma A., Hingamp P., Quackenbush J., Sherlock G., Spellman P., Stoeckert C., Aach J., Ansorge W., Ball C. A., Causton H. C. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001 Dec;29(4):365–371. doi: 10.1038/ng1201-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brazma Alvis, Parkinson Helen, Sarkans Ugis, Shojatalab Mohammadreza, Vilo Jaak, Abeygunawardena Niran, Holloway Ele, Kapushesky Misha, Kemmeren Patrick, Lara Gonzalo Garcia. ArrayExpress--a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):68–71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burchiel S. W., Knall C. M., Davis J. W., 2nd, Paules R. S., Boggs S. E., Afshari C. A. Analysis of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of toxicity: potential roles of toxicogenomics and proteomics in toxicology. Toxicol Sci. 2001 Feb;59(2):193–195. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/59.2.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burczynski M. E., McMillian M., Ciervo J., Li L., Parker J. B., Dunn R. T., 2nd, Hicken S., Farr S., Johnson M. D. Toxicogenomics-based discrimination of toxic mechanism in HepG2 human hepatoma cells. Toxicol Sci. 2000 Dec;58(2):399–415. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/58.2.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crosby L. M., Hyder K. S., DeAngelo A. B., Kepler T. B., Gaskill B., Benavides G. R., Yoon L., Morgan K. T. Morphologic analysis correlates with gene expression changes in cultured F344 rat mesothelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000 Dec 15;169(3):205–221. doi: 10.1006/taap.2000.9049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fielden M. R., Zacharewski T. R. Challenges and limitations of gene expression profiling in mechanistic and predictive toxicology. Toxicol Sci. 2001 Mar;60(1):6–10. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/60.1.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodsaid Federico M., Smith Roger J., Rosenblum I. Y. Quantitative PCR deconstruction of discrepancies between results reported by different hybridization platforms. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):456–460. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamadeh Hisham K., Bushel Pierre R., Jayadev Supriya, Martin Karla, DiSorbo Olimpia, Sieber Stella, Bennett Lee, Tennant Raymond, Stoll Raymond, Barrett J. Carl. Gene expression analysis reveals chemical-specific profiles. Toxicol Sci. 2002 Jun;67(2):219–231. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/67.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harries H. M., Fletcher S. T., Duggan C. M., Baker V. A. The use of genomics technology to investigate gene expression changes in cultured human liver cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2001 Aug-Oct;15(4-5):399–405. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(01)00043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kramer Jeffrey A., Pettit Syril D., Amin Rupesh P., Bertram Timothy A., Car Bruce, Cunningham Michael, Curtiss Sandra W., Davis John W., Kind Clive, Lawton Michael. Overview on the application of transcription profiling using selected nephrotoxicants for toxicology assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):460–464. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mattes William B. Annotation and cross-indexing of array elements on multiple platforms. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):506–510. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mattes William B., Pettit Syril D., Sansone Susanna-Assunta, Bushel Pierre R., Waters Michael D. Database development in toxicogenomics: issues and efforts. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):495–505. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Newton Ronald K., Aardema Marilyn, Aubrecht Jiri. The utility of DNA microarrays for characterizing genotoxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):420–422. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nuwaysir E. F., Bittner M., Trent J., Barrett J. C., Afshari C. A. Microarrays and toxicology: the advent of toxicogenomics. Mol Carcinog. 1999 Mar;24(3):153–159. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199903)24:3<153::aid-mc1>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rosenzweig Barry A., Pine P. Scott, Domon Olen E., Morris Suzanne M., Chen James J., Sistare Frank D. Dye bias correction in dual-labeled cDNA microarray gene expression measurements. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):480–487. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simmons P. Trinia, Portier Christopher J. Toxicogenomics: the new frontier in risk analysis. Carcinogenesis. 2002 Jun;23(6):903–905. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.6.903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith L. L. Key challenges for toxicologists in the 21st century. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001 Jun;22(6):281–285. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01714-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Storck Thorsten, von Brevern Marie-Charlotte, Behrens Christian K., Scheel Julia, Bach Alfred. Transcriptomics in predictive toxicology. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2002 Jan;5(1):90–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tennant Raymond W. The National Center for Toxicogenomics: using new technologies to inform mechanistic toxicology. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Jan;110(1):A8–10. doi: 10.1289/ehp.110-a8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson Karol L., Afshari Cynthia A., Amin Rupesh P., Bertram Timothy A., Car Bruce, Cunningham Michael, Kind Clive, Kramer Jeffrey A., Lawton Michael, Mirsky Michael. Identification of platform-independent gene expression markers of cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):488–494. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ulrich Roger G., Rockett John C., Gibson G. Gordon, Pettit Syril D. Overview of an interlaboratory collaboration on evaluating the effects of model hepatotoxicants on hepatic gene expression. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):423–427. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ulrich Roger, Friend Stephen H. Toxicogenomics and drug discovery: will new technologies help us produce better drugs? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002 Jan;1(1):84–88. doi: 10.1038/nrd710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Waring J. F., Ciurlionis R., Jolly R. A., Heindel M., Ulrich R. G. Microarray analysis of hepatotoxins in vitro reveals a correlation between gene expression profiles and mechanisms of toxicity. Toxicol Lett. 2001 Mar 31;120(1-3):359–368. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00267-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Waring Jeffrey F., Halbert Donald N. The promise of toxicogenomics. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2002 Jun;4(3):229–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Waring Jeffrey F., Ulrich Roger G., Flint Nick, Morfitt David, Kalkuhl Arno, Staedtler Frank, Lawton Michael, Beekman Johanna M., Suter Laura. Interlaboratory evaluation of rat hepatic gene expression changes induced by methapyrilene. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(4):439–448. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES