Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2004 Apr;112(5):575–582. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6831

Sensitivity of the immature rat uterotrophic assay to mixtures of estrogens.

Helen Tinwell 1, John Ashby 1
PMCID: PMC1241924  PMID: 15064164

Abstract

We have evaluated whether mixtures of estrogens, present in the mix at doses that are individually inactive in the immature rat uterotrophic assay, can give a uterotrophic response. Seven chemicals were evaluated: nonylphenol, bisphenol A (BPA), methoxychlor, genistein (GEN), estradiol, diethylstilbestrol, and ethinyl estradiol. Dose responses in the uterotrophic assay were constructed for each chemical. The first series of experiments involved evaluating binary mixtures of BPA and GEN at dose levels that gave moderate uterotrophic responses when tested individually. The mixtures generally showed an intermediate or reduced uterotrophic effect compared with when the components of the mixture were tested alone at the dose used in the mixture. The next series of experiments used a multicomponent (complex) mixture of all seven chemicals evaluated at doses that gave either weakly positive or inactive uterotrophic responses when tested individually in the assay. Doses that were nominally equi-uterotrophic ranged over approximately six orders of magnitude for the seven chemicals. Doses of agents that gave a weak uterotrophic response when tested individually gave a marginally enhanced positive response in the assay when tested combined as a mixture. Doses of agents that gave a negative uterotrophic response when tested individually gave a positive response when tested as a mixture. These data indicate that a variety of different estrogen receptor (ER) agonists, present individually at subeffective doses, can act simultaneously to evoke an ER-regulated response. However, translating these findings into the process of environmental hazard assessment will be difficult. The simple addition of the observed, or predicted, activities for the components of a mixture is confirmed here to be inappropriate and to overestimate the actual effect induced by the mixture. Equally, isobole analysis is only suitable for two- or three-component mixtures, and concentration addition requires access to dose-response data and EC50 values (concentration giving 50% of the maximum response) for the individual components of the mixture--requirements that will rarely be fulfilled for complex environmental samples. Given these uncertainties, we conclude that it may be most expedient to select and bioassay whole environmental mixtures of potential concern.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (626.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. N., Clark J. H., Peck E. J., Jr The relationship between nuclear receptor-estrogen binding and uterotrophic responses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Sep 26;48(6):1460–1468. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(72)90878-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson J. N., Peck E. J., Jr, Clark J. H. Estrogen-induced uterine responses and growth: relationship to receptor estrogen binding by uterine nuclei. Endocrinology. 1975 Jan;96(1):160–167. doi: 10.1210/endo-96-1-160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashby J., Paton D., Callander R. D. Potent mutagenicity to Salmonella of an equimolar mixture of 52 chemicals used in five collaborative studies. Mutagenesis. 1988 Jul;3(4):345–347. doi: 10.1093/mutage/3.4.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berenbaum M. C. Criteria for analyzing interactions between biologically active agents. Adv Cancer Res. 1981;35:269–335. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60912-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charles Grantley D., Gennings C., Zacharewski Timothy R., Gollapudi B. Bhaskar, Carney Edward W. An approach for assessing estrogen receptor-mediated interactions in mixtures of three chemicals: a pilot study. Toxicol Sci. 2002 Aug;68(2):349–360. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/68.2.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen D. G., Pounds J. G. A nonlinear isobologram model with Box-Cox transformation to both sides for chemical mixtures. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106 (Suppl 6):1367–1371. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feron V. J., Arts J. H., Kuper C. F., Slootweg P. J., Woutersen R. A. Health risks associated with inhaled nasal toxicants. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2001 May;31(3):313–347. doi: 10.1080/20014091111712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gray L. E., Jr, Ostby J., Wilson V., Lambright C., Bobseine K., Hartig P., Hotchkiss A., Wolf C., Furr J., Price M. Xenoendocrine disrupters-tiered screening and testing: filling key data gaps. Toxicology. 2002 Dec 27;181-182:371–382. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00469-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heindel J. J., Chapin R. E., George J., Gulati D. K., Fail P. A., Barnes L. H., Yang R. S. Assessment of the reproductive toxicity of a complex mixture of 25 groundwater contaminants in mice and rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1995 Apr;25(1):9–19. doi: 10.1006/faat.1995.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heindel J. J., Chapin R. E., Gulati D. K., George J. D., Price C. J., Marr M. C., Myers C. B., Barnes L. H., Fail P. A., Grizzle T. B. Assessment of the reproductive and developmental toxicity of pesticide/fertilizer mixtures based on confirmed pesticide contamination in California and Iowa groundwater. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994 May;22(4):605–621. doi: 10.1006/faat.1994.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ito N., Hiasa Y., Konishi Y., Marugami M. The development of carcinoma in liver of rats treated with m-toluylenediamine and the synergistic and antagonistic effects with other chemicals. Cancer Res. 1969 May;29(5):1137–1145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jobling S., Beresford N., Nolan M., Rodgers-Gray T., Brighty G. C., Sumpter J. P., Tyler C. R. Altered sexual maturation and gamete production in wild roach (Rutilus rutilus) living in rivers that receive treated sewage effluents. Biol Reprod. 2002 Feb;66(2):272–281. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod66.2.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kanno J., Onyon L., Haseman J., Fenner-Crisp P., Ashby J., Owens W., Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Aug;109(8):785–794. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kanno Jun, Onyon Lesley, Peddada Shyamal, Ashby John, Jacob Elard, Owens William. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1530–1549. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kortenkamp A., Altenburger R. Synergisms with mixtures of xenoestrogens: a reevaluation using the method of isoboles. Sci Total Environ. 1998 Sep 29;221(1):59–73. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00261-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krewski D., Thomas R. D. Carcinogenic mixtures. Risk Anal. 1992 Mar;12(1):105–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lagorio S., Forastiere F., Lipsett M., Menichini E. Inquinamento atmosferico da traffico e rischio di tumori. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2000;36(3):311–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lan N. C., Katzenellenbogen B. S. Temporal relationships between hormone receptor binding and biological responses in the uterus: studies with short- and long-acting derivatives of estriol. Endocrinology. 1976 Jan;98(1):220–227. doi: 10.1210/endo-98-1-220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lijinsky W., Reuber M. D., Riggs C. W. Carcinogenesis by combinations of N-nitroso compounds in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 1983 Oct;21(5):601–605. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(83)90147-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nellemann Christine, Dalgaard Majken, Lam Henrik Rye, Vinggaard Anne Marie. The combined effects of vinclozolin and procymidone do not deviate from expected additivity in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Sci. 2003 Feb;71(2):251–262. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/71.2.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nisbet I. C., LaGoy P. K. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1992 Dec;16(3):290–300. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Odum J., Lefevre P. A., Tittensor S., Paton D., Routledge E. J., Beresford N. A., Sumpter J. P., Ashby J. The rodent uterotrophic assay: critical protocol features, studies with nonyl phenols, and comparison with a yeast estrogenicity assay. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Apr;25(2):176–188. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Payne J., Scholze M., Kortenkamp A. Mixtures of four organochlorines enhance human breast cancer cell proliferation. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Apr;109(4):391–397. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rajapakse Nissanka, Silva Elisabete, Kortenkamp Andreas. Combining xenoestrogens at levels below individual no-observed-effect concentrations dramatically enhances steroid hormone action. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Sep;110(9):917–921. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodgers-Gray T. P., Jobling S., Kelly C., Morris S., Brighty G., Waldock M. J., Sumpter J. P., Tyler C. R. Exposure of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to treated sewage effluent induces dose-dependent and persistent disruption in gonadal duct development. Environ Sci Technol. 2001 Feb 1;35(3):462–470. doi: 10.1021/es001225c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Safe S. H. Hazard and risk assessment of chemical mixtures using the toxic equivalency factor approach. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Aug;106 (Suppl 4):1051–1058. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s41051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Salamone M. F., Heddle J. A., Katz M. The use of the Salmonella/microsomal assay to determine mutagenicity in paired chemical mixtures. Can J Genet Cytol. 1979 Mar;21(1):101–107. doi: 10.1139/g79-013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Silva Elisabete, Rajapakse Nissanka, Kortenkamp Andreas. Something from "nothing"--eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects. Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Apr 15;36(8):1751–1756. doi: 10.1021/es0101227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Takayama S., Hasegawa H., Ohgaki H. Combination effects of forty carcinogens administered at low doses to male rats. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1989 Aug;80(8):732–736. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb01706.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor M. S., Setzer R. W., DeMarini D. M. Examination of the additivity assumption using the spiral and standard Salmonella assays to evaluate binary combinations of mutagens. Mutat Res. 1995 Aug;335(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(95)90058-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tully D. B., Cox V. T., Mumtaz M. M., Davis V. L., Chapin R. E. Six high-priority organochlorine pesticides, either singly or in combination, are nonestrogenic in transfected HeLa cells. Reprod Toxicol. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(2):95–102. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(00)00060-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Van den Berg M., Birnbaum L., Bosveld A. T., Brunström B., Cook P., Feeley M., Giesy J. P., Hanberg A., Hasegawa R., Kennedy S. W. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106(12):775–792. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Waters M. D., Claxton L. D., Stack H. F., Graedel T. E. Genetic activity profiles--application in assessing potential carcinogenicity of complex environmental mixtures. IARC Sci Publ. 1990;(104):75–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES