Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44164. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044164

Dissecting causal relationships between dietary factors and intracerebral hemorrhage: A Mendelian randomization study

Peng Wang a, Dashuai Qiao a, Fangwen Liu a, Fanzhen Dong a, Jinfeng Li a, Gang Xue a,*
PMCID: PMC12419279  PMID: 40922330

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe and often fatal brain disorder. Despite the recognition of dietary adjustments as a preventive measure, there is a need for well-designed studies to investigate the dietary factors of ICH patients. We employed Mendelian randomization to explore the relationship between 35 dietary factors (exposures) and ICH (outcome). We applied several statistical methods, including inverse variance weighted, weighted median, Mendelian randomization-Egger regression, simple mode, and weighted mode. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of our findings. Our study suggested that hot drink temperature (OR: 0.39, P = .037) and fresh fruit intake (OR: 0.389, P = .048) could potentially reduce the risk of ICH. Additionally, although a suggestively increased risk of ICH was observed with cooked vegetable intake (OR: 4.493, P = .036), the wide confidence interval (1.107–18.246) reflects imprecision in the estimate, and further research is needed to clarify this association. These findings provide novel dietary intervention strategies and insights for preventing ICH, holding the potential to inform more targeted health guidance recommendations.

Keywords: diets, intracerebral hemorrhage, Mendelian randomization, nutrition, prevention

1. Introduction

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), which accounts for approximately 10% to 20% of all stroke cases, is a prominent cause of stroke and significantly contributes to mortality and long-term disability worldwide.[1,2] While the exact causes of ICH remain elusive, some studies have revealed certain risk factors that play a role in the development of ICH, such as hypertension, diabetes and chronic kidney disease.[37] Addressing these risk factors, dietary habits play a crucial role in maintaining stable blood pressure, controlling blood sugar, and improving kidney function.[810] Through adjusting our dietary habits, it might decrease the likelihood of developing ICH. A systematic review and meta-analysis, which synthesized data from 20 prospective cohort studies across Europe, the United States, and Asia, found that the intake of fruits and vegetables has a protective effect against stroke.[11] Additionally, a meta-analysis has indicated that in Japanese, but not in non-Japanese, a diet high in saturated fat is associated with a low risk of ICH.[12] However, despite some studies involving a small amount of dietary information, there remains a lack of systematic and well-designed research into the dietary habits of ICH patients, which is crucial for developing dietary interventions to prevent ICH.

Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, an innovative statistical technique, employs genetic variants like single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables (IVs) to estimate the causal relationship between exposure and outcome with high precision.[13] By leveraging the random assortment of genetic variations during meiosis, MR analysis can minimize the impact of confounding factors and reverse causality, thus controlling for biases often present in observational studies.[14,15] In this study, we applied MR analysis to explore the genetic causal relationship between 35 dietary factors and ICH, aiming to shed light on potential preventive measures for ICH.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study design

This study investigates the relationship between dietary factors and ICH. The design and data sources of the study are presented in Figure 1. To more accurately estimate the causal effects, the application of SNPs as IVs in MR analysis is predicated on 3 critical assumptions: first, the IV must be closely associated with the exposure; second, the IV should be independent of confounding factors; and third, the IV should exert its influence on the outcome exclusively through the exposure and not through any other pathways.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A directed acyclic graph depicting the hypothesized impact of dietary factors on ICH. ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage.

2.2. Data sources

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 35 dietary factors, encompassing a diverse range of food intakes. These included various types of staple food intakes such as cereal, plain cereal, whole-wheat cereal, bran cereal, white pasta, whole meal pasta, bread, and white rice; meat intakes such as pork, poultry, beef, bacon, processed meat, oil fish, and nonoily fish; beverage intakes such as water, tea, green tea, herbal tea, milk, yogurt, coffee, fizzy drink, red wine, beer plus cider, white wine, rose wine and spirits; fruit and vegetable intakes such as fresh fruit, stewed fruit, dried fruit, salad/raw vegetable, and cooked vegetable intake; alcohol intake frequency; and hot drink temperature. The relevant genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets were sourced from the IEU OpenGWAS project (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk), and dataset details are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Detailed information about data sources of dietary factors and ICH.

Traits GWAS ID Sample size SNPs Population P value
Cereal intake ukb-b-15926 441,640 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Plain cereal intake ukb-b-20023 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Whole-wheat cereal intake ukb-b-2375 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Bran cereal intake ukb-b-19498 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
White pasta intake ukb-b-2512 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Wholemeal pasta intake ukb-b-4150 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Bread intake ukb-b-11348 452,236 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
White rice intake ukb-b-14690 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Pork intake ukb-b-5640 460,162 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Poultry intake ukb-b-8006 461,900 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Beef intake ukb-b-2862 461,053 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Bacon intake ukb-b-4414 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Processed meat intake ukb-b-6324 461,981 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Oily fish intake ukb-b-2209 460,443 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Nonoily fish intake ukb-b-17627 460,880 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Water intake ukb-b-14898 427,588 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Tea intake ukb-b-6066 447,485 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Green tea intake ukb-b-4078 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Milk intake ukb-b-2966 64,943 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Yogurt intake ukb-b-7753 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Coffee intake ukb-b-5237 428,860 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Fizzy drink intake ukb-b-2832 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Average weekly red wine intake ukb-b-5239 327,026 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Average weekly beer plus cider intake ukb-b-5174 327,634 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
White wine intake ukb-b-311 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Rose wine intake ukb-b-16124 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Average weekly spirits intake ukb-b-1707 326,565 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Alcohol intake frequency ukb-b-5779 462,346 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Herbal tea intake ukb-b-13344 64,949 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Hot drink temperature ukb-b-14203 457,873 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Fresh fruit intake ukb-b-3881 446,462 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Stewed fruit intake ukb-b-8676 64,942 9851,867 European 5.00E‐06
Dried fruit intake ukb-b-16576 421,764 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Salad/raw vegetable intake ukb-b-1996 435,435 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Cooked vegetable intake ukb-b-8089 448,651 9851,867 European 5.00E‐08
Intracerebral hemorrhage ebi-a-GCST90018870 473,513 24,191,284 European NA

ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage.

2.3. The selection of IVs

We selected SNPs as IVs, adhering to a set of criteria to ensure the accuracy and reliability of our findings. We adopted a primary P-value threshold of P < 5.0 × 10‐8 to ensure the robustness of the IVs. However, given the limited sample sizes and lower heritability of some dietary factors (Table 1), we implemented a secondary threshold of P < 5.0 × 10‐6. This approach balances 2 risks: the risk of losing informative instruments at overly stringent thresholds, against the risk of introducing non-informative instruments and increased pleiotropy at higher thresholds.[16] To avoid linkage disequilibrium bias, we required that the significant SNPs associated with exposure factors must have r2 < 0.001 with any other SNP, and be genetically distant by 10,000 kb. We extracted the significant SNPs related to exposure factors from the GWAS dataset of the outcome variable, documenting comprehensive details of these IVs. This information included the effect allele, the effect size of the allele (β), SE, and P-value. To test the strength of each IV, we calculated the F-statistic with the formula F = (βexposure/SEexposure)2. We selected all IVs with an F-statistic > 10 to address potential weak instrument bias.[17] Additionally, we searched for each selected SNP in databases such as Phenoscanner[18] and the GWAS catalog[19] to ensure that the selected SNPs are not associated with potential confounders such as age, sex, and lifestyle factors (P < 5.0 × 10−8).

2.4. Statistical analysis

In the MR analysis, we utilized a variety of methods to infer causal relationships, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger regression, simple mode, and weighted mode. Among these, we adopted the IVW method as the primary approach for MR analysis. When each genetic variant meets the IV assumptions, the IVW method integrates the Wald ratio estimates of causal effects from different SNPs, providing a consistent estimate of the causal effect of exposure on the outcome.[20] To enhance the reliability of our results, we employed the weighted median and MR-Egger methods as supplements to the IVW method.[21,22] We used Cochran Q test to assess heterogeneity, considering significant heterogeneity to be present when the P < .05.[23] Furthermore, we assessed horizontal pleiotropy using the intercept of the MR-Egger regression.[24] To detect and correct for horizontal pleiotropy, we applied the MR-PRESSO test, which corrects by removing outliers.[25] We also conducted a “leave-one-out” analysis, where we sequentially excluded 1 SNP at a time and calculated the MR effect of the remaining SNPs, to evaluate the impact of each SNP on the outcome. This was visually presented through a forest plot, allowing us to assess the stability of the MR analysis results. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.4.0) and R packages (TwoSampleMR[26] and MR-PRESSO[27]). We applied the Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple comparisons, considering P < .0014 (0.05/35) as statistically significant, and 0.0014 < P < .05 as suggestive of potential associations.[28]

3. Results

In our study, we screened the SNPs using a set of criteria, and excluded palindromic SNPs (i.e., A/T or G/C) and those not available in the outcome dataset. Ultimately, the number of SNPs used in our study ranged from 4 to 90, and all IVs had F-statistics > 10, indicating no weak IV bias.

We identified 3 dietary factors that have a potential causal relationship with ICH using the IVW method, all with P < .05. Specifically, hot drink temperature (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.161–0.947; P = .037) and fresh fruit intake (OR: 0.389; 95% CI: 0.153–0.99; P = .048) were both recognized as potential protective factors for ICH (Figs. 2A, B and 3). These results suggest that increasing the intake of fresh fruits and hot drinks may help reduce the risk of ICH. Additionally, a suggestively increased risk of ICH was observed with cooked vegetable intake (OR: 4.493; 95% CI: 1.107–18.246; P = .036) (Figs. 2C and 3). However, the wide confidence interval reflects the imprecision in the estimate.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Scatter plots of the causal relationship between ICH and dietary factors. (A) Hot drink temperature. (B) Fresh fruit intake. (C) Cooked vegetable intake. ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Forest plot from IVW method showing links between 35 dietary factors and ICH. CI = confidence interval, ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage, OR = odds ratio, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Cochran Q test revealed no statistically significant heterogeneity in the MR studies examining the relationship between hot drink temperature, fresh fruit intake, and cooked vegetable intake with ICH (Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content, https://links.lww.com/MD/P860). This lack of heterogeneity, along with the absence of significant pleiotropy in the correlation analysis between dietary factors and ICH (all P > .05, Table S2, Supplemental Digital Content, https://links.lww.com/MD/P860), enhances the credibility of our findings. Furthermore, the leave-one-out analysis demonstrated that excluding each SNP individually had no significant impact on the robustness of our results (Fig. 4). All sensitivity analyses supported our findings.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The results of leave-one-out sensitivity analysis on ICH. (A) Hot drink temperature. (B) Fresh fruit intake. (C) Cooked vegetable intake. ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage.

4. Discussion

ICH is a severe form of brain disease, associated with a relatively low survival rate.[29] Survivors of ICH often face long-term functional decline and have a higher risk of developing dementia.[30,31] As is widely recognized, dietary therapy plays a crucial role in disease prevention.[32,33] Understanding the causal relationship between dietary factors and ICH, and subsequently adjusting dietary habits, may effectively prevent and intervene in the occurrence of ICH. MR analysis has the advantage of being able to effectively exclude the effects of reverse causality and confounding factors.[34] Therefore, in this study, we employed MR analysis to investigate the causal relationships between 35 dietary factors and ICH. After obtaining our research results, we conducted sensitivity analyses to validate their reliability. Our findings suggested that hot drink temperature and fresh fruit intake may be potential dietary factors associated with a reduced risk of ICH, while cooked vegetable intake may be linked to an increased risk. Additionally, no significant associations were found between other dietary factors and ICH.

Quinlan et al have demonstrated that hot drink intake can rapidly increase skin conductance and temperature, potentially promoting vasodilation and enhancing mood.[35] This mood enhancement and anxiety reduction may help mitigate stress-induced blood pressure fluctuations, thereby indirectly reducing the risk of ICH. Similarly, fresh fruits also play a unique role in health promotion. He et al have confirmed that increasing the intake of fresh fruits can reduce the risk of stroke.[36] Our results further indicate that fresh fruit intake can decrease the likelihood of ICH. The dietary fiber abundant in fresh fruits supports intestinal health and guards against constipation, thereby avoiding the potential risk of ICH from straining during bowel movements.[37,38] Moreover, regular intake of fresh fruits promotes long-term weight control and diminishes the incidence of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, all of which are potential risk factors for ICH.[37] In addition, fresh fruits are a rich source of vitamins and minerals. These micronutrients are essential for critical physiological processes including energy-yielding metabolism, DNA synthesis, and oxygen transport, underscoring their importance for brain health.[39] As time passes, the nutritional value of fruits, such as vitamins and minerals, may gradually decrease, and prolonged storage can also degrade the taste, and even potentially foster mold growth.[40,41] Therefore, prioritizing the intake of fresh fruits is essential for preventing ICH.

It is well-known that vegetables are rich in a variety of nutrients and greatly beneficial to both physical and mental health.[42,43] Nevertheless, in our study, a suggestive increase in ICH risk was observed for cooked vegetable intake. This could be attributed to the changes in the nutritional content and chemical composition of vegetables during the cooking process.[44,45] Previous studies also support this viewpoint. For instance, Feng et al have indicated that a higher intake of raw rather than cooked vegetables is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular diseases.[46] Our study results serve as a reminder that not all vegetable intake is beneficial to health. However, the association between cooked vegetable intake and higher ICH risk should be interpreted with caution due to the wide confidence interval (1.107–18.246). Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this potential link.

Moreover, it is important to note that our study sample was predominantly European, and previous research has indicated that the incidence of ICH varies across different regions.[2] This implies that our findings may not be fully applicable to other areas, thus our research results have certain limitations in terms of universality. Additionally, the use of a secondary, less stringent threshold (P < 5.0 × 10‐6) for selecting IVs may have increased the risk of including weak or false-positive instruments. In our study, we mitigated this risk by requiring all IVs to have F-statistics > 10 and performing a series of sensitivity analyses. However, residual bias cannot be completely ruled out.

5. Conclusion

Our study indicates that hot drink temperature and fresh fruit intake may act as potential protective factors against ICH risk. Additionally, a suggestively increased risk of ICH was observed in association with cooked vegetable intake. However, the wide confidence interval reflects imprecision in the estimate, highlighting the need for further investigation to clarify this association.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Peng Wang, Dashuai Qiao.

Formal analysis: Fangwen Liu, Jinfeng Li.

Investigation: Dashuai Qiao.

Methodology: Peng Wang, Dashuai Qiao.

Project administration: Gang Xue.

Resources: Fanzhen Dong.

Writing – original draft: Peng Wang, Dashuai Qiao, Gang Xue.

Writing – review & editing: Peng Wang, Dashuai Qiao, Fangwen Liu, Fanzhen Dong, Jinfeng Li, Gang Xue.

Supplementary Material

medi-104-e44164-s001.docx (18.3KB, docx)

Abbreviations:

GWAS
genome-wide association study
ICH
intracerebral hemorrhage
IVs
instrumental variables
IVW
inverse variance weighted
MR
Mendelian randomization
SNPs
single nucleotide polymorphisms

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article.

How to cite this article: Wang P, Qiao D, Liu F, Dong F, Li J, Xue G. Dissecting causal relationships between dietary factors and intracerebral hemorrhage: A Mendelian randomization study. Medicine 2025;104:36(e44164).

PW and DQ contributed to this article equally.

Contributor Information

Peng Wang, Email: 1125696246@qq.com.

Dashuai Qiao, Email: 1102412896@qq.com.

Fangwen Liu, Email: 511514828@qq.com.

Fanzhen Dong, Email: 479577016@qq.com.

Jinfeng Li, Email: 470486974@qq.com.

References

  • [1].Hillal A, Ullberg T, Ramgren B, Wassélius J. Computed tomography in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: neuroimaging predictors of hematoma expansion and outcome. Insights Imaging. 2022;13:180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Xu L, Wang Z, Wu W, Li M, Li Q. Global, regional, and national burden of intracerebral hemorrhage and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2021: results from the 2021 global burden of disease study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24:2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].O’Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2010;376:112–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Sallinen H, Pietilä A, Salomaa V, Strbian D. Risk factors of intracerebral hemorrhage: a case-control study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29:104630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Saliba W, Barnett-Griness O, Gronich N, et al. Association of diabetes and glycated hemoglobin with the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:682–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Vanent KN, Leasure AC, Acosta JN, et al. Association of chronic kidney disease with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:911–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Carey RM, Muntner P, Bosworth HB, Whelton PK. Prevention and control of hypertension: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1278–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Oza MJ, Laddha AP, Gaikwad AB, Mulay SR, Kulkarni YA. Role of dietary modifications in the management of type 2 diabetic complications. Pharmacol Res. 2021;168:105602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Ko GJ, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Joshi S. The effects of high-protein diets on kidney health and longevity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31:1667–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Hu D, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhang D, Qu Y. Fruits and vegetables consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Stroke. 2014;45:1613–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Muto M, Ezaki O. High dietary saturated fat is associated with a low risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke in japanese but not in non-japanese: a review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018;25:375–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Bowden J, Holmes MV. Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: a review. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10:486–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Burgess S, Small DS, Thompson SG. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017;26:2333–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Burgess S, Thompson SG. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181:251–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Alhathli E, Julian T, Girach ZUA, et al. Mendelian randomization study with clinical follow-up links metabolites to risk and severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13:e032256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Xie J, Huang H, Liu Z, et al. The associations between modifiable risk factors and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a comprehensive Mendelian randomization study. Hepatology. 2023;77:949–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R, et al. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4851–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Buniello A, MacArthur JAL, Cerezo M, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D1005–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Bae SC, Lee YH. Vitamin D level and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis: a Mendelian randomization. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:2415–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40:304–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:512–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Bowden J, Del Greco MF, Minelli C, Davey Smith G, Sheehan NA, Thompson JR. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1961–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Greco M FD, Minelli C, Sheehan NA, Thompson JR. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome. Stat Med. 2015;34:2926–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Sang N, Gao RC, Zhang MY, Wu ZZ, Wu ZG, Wu GC. Causal relationship between sleep traits and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol. 2022;13:918749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018;7:e34408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50:693–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Larsson SC, Traylor M, Malik R, Dichgans M, Burgess S, Markus HS. Modifiable pathways in Alzheimer’s disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis. BMJ. 2017;359:j5375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Poon MT, Fonville AF, Al-Shahi Salman R. Long-term prognosis after intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:660–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Pasi M, Casolla B, Kyheng M, et al. Long-term functional decline of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage survivors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92:249–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Moulin S, Labreuche J, Bombois S, et al. Dementia risk after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:820–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Wu Q, Gao ZJ, Yu X, Wang P. Dietary regulation in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Santos L. The impact of nutrition and lifestyle modification on health. Eur J Intern Med. 2022;97:18–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Zhou H, Qi Y, Xu Y, Qi X, Qi H. Reverse causation between multiple sclerosis and psoriasis: a genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization study. Sci Rep. 2024;14:8845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Quinlan P, Lane J, Aspinall L. Effects of hot tea, coffee and water ingestion on physiological responses and mood: the role of caffeine, water and beverage type. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997;134:164–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].He FJ, Nowson CA, MacGregor GA. Fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006;367:320–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Dreher ML. Whole fruits and fruit fiber emerging health effects. Nutrients. 2018;10:1833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Pem D, Jeewon R. Fruit and vegetable intake: benefits and progress of nutrition education interventions-narrative review article. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44:1309–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Tardy AL, Pouteau E, Marquez D, Yilmaz C, Scholey A. Vitamins and minerals for energy, fatigue and cognition: a narrative review of the biochemical and clinical evidence. Nutrients. 2020;12:228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].He X, Pu Y, Chen L, et al. A comprehensive review of intelligent packaging for fruits and vegetables: target responders, classification, applications, and future challenges. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023;22:842–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Wang Z, Sui Y, Li J, Tian X, Wang Q. Biological control of postharvest fungal decays in citrus: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62:861–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:1029–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Głąbska D, Guzek D, Groele B, Gutkowska K. Fruit and vegetable intake and mental health in adults: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2020;12:115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Chan Q, Stamler J, Brown IJ, et al. Relation of raw and cooked vegetable consumption to blood pressure: the INTERMAP Study. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28:353–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Lee S, Choi Y, Jeong HS, Lee J, Sung J. Effect of different cooking methods on the content of vitamins and true retention in selected vegetables. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018;27:333–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Feng Q, Kim JH, Omiyale W, et al. Raw and cooked vegetable consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: a study of 400,000 adults in UK biobank. Front Nutr. 2022;9:831470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

medi-104-e44164-s001.docx (18.3KB, docx)

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES