Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2004 Apr;112(5):636–642. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6754

Reporting pesticide assessment results to farmworker families: development, implementation, and evaluation of a risk communication strategy.

Sara A Quandt 1, Alicia M Doran 1, Pamela Rao 1, Jane A Hoppin 1, Beverly M Snively 1, Thomas A Arcury 1
PMCID: PMC1241934  PMID: 15064174

Abstract

The collection of environmental samples presents a responsibility to return information to the affected participants. Explaining complex and often ambiguous scientific information to a lay audience is a challenge. As shown by environmental justice research, this audience frequently has limited formal education, increasing the challenge for researchers to explain the data collected, the risk indicated by the findings, and action the affected community should take. In this study we describe the development and implementation of a risk communication strategy for environmental pesticide samples collected in the homes of Latino/a migrant and seasonal farmworkers in a community-based participatory research project. The communication strategy was developed with community input and was based on face-to-face meetings with members of participating households. Using visual displays of data effectively conveyed information about individual household contamination and placed it in the context of community findings. The lack of national reference data and definitive standards for action necessitated a simplified risk message. We review the strengths and weaknesses of such an approach and suggest areas for future research in risk communication to communities affected by environmental health risks.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (325.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arcury T. A., Quandt S. A., Dearry A. Farmworker pesticide exposure and community-based participatory research: rationale and practical applications. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Jun;109 (Suppl 3):429–434. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s3429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards A., Elwyn G., Covey J., Matthews E., Pill R. Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun. 2001 Jan-Mar;6(1):61–82. doi: 10.1080/10810730150501413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gazmararian J. A., Baker D. W., Williams M. V., Parker R. M., Scott T. L., Green D. C., Fehrenbach S. N., Ren J., Koplan J. P. Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):545–551. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Geno P. W., Camann D. E., Harding H. J., Villalobos K., Lewis R. G. Handwipe sampling and analysis procedure for the measurement of dermal contact with pesticides. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Jan;30(1):132–138. doi: 10.1007/BF00211339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hong Zhiyong, Günter Merkel, Randow Friedrich F. E. Meconium: a matrix reflecting potential fetal exposure to organochlorine pesticides and its metabolites. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2002 Jan;51(1):60–64. doi: 10.1006/eesa.2001.2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Israel B. A., Schulz A. J., Parker E. A., Becker A. B. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lipkus I. M., Samsa G., Rimer B. K. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):37–44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller Mark, Solomon Gina. Environmental risk communication for the clinician. Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 2):211–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Quandt S. A., Arcury T. A., Austin C. K., Cabrera L. F. Preventing occupational exposure to pesticides: using participatory research with latino farmworkers to develop an intervention. J Immigr Health. 2001 Apr;3(2):85–96. doi: 10.1023/A:1009513916713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Quandt Sara A., Arcury Thomas A., Rao Pamela, Snively Beverly M., Camann David E., Doran Alicia M., Yau Alice Y., Hoppin Jane A., Jackson David S. Agricultural and residential pesticides in wipe samples from farmworker family residences in North Carolina and Virginia. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(3):382–387. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Simcox N. J., Fenske R. A., Wolz S. A., Lee I. C., Kalman D. A. Pesticides in household dust and soil: exposure pathways for children of agricultural families. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Dec;103(12):1126–1134. doi: 10.1289/ehp.951031126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson Beti, Coronado Gloria, Snipes Shedra A., Puschel Klaus. Methodologic advances and ongoing challenges in designing community-based health promotion programs. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001 Nov 6;24:315–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.140819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Villarejo Don. The health of U.S. hired farm workers. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001 Nov 6;24:175–193. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.140901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Whyatt R. M., Barr D. B. Measurement of organophosphate metabolites in postpartum meconium as a potential biomarker of prenatal exposure: a validation study. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Apr;109(4):417–420. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES