Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Jan;109(1):1–5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.011091

Environmental epidemiology: challenges and opportunities.

J Pekkanen 1, N Pearce 1
PMCID: PMC1242043  PMID: 11171517

Abstract

Epidemiology is struggling increasingly with problems with correlated exposures and small relative risks. As a consequence, some scholars have strongly emphasized molecular epidemiology, whereas others have argued for the importance of the population context and the reintegration of epidemiology into public health. Environmental epidemiology has several unique features that make these debates especially pertinent to it. The very large number of environmental exposures require prioritization, and the relative risks are usually very low. Furthermore, many environmental exposures can be addressed only by comparing populations rather than individuals, and the disruption of both local and global ecosystems requires us to develop new methods of study design. The population context is also very important to consider in risk management decisions because of the involuntary nature of most environmental exposures and the diversity of possible outcomes, both health- and nonhealth-related. Studies at the individual or molecular level tend to focus the research hypotheses and subsequent interventions at that level, even when research and interventions at other levels may be more appropriate. Thus, only by starting from the population and ecosystem levels can we ensure that these are given appropriate consideration. Although better research is needed at all levels, it is crucially important to choose the most appropriate level, or levels, of research for a particular problem. Only by conducting research at all these levels and by developing further methods to combine evidence from these different levels can we hope to address the challenges facing environmental epidemiology today.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (63.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates M. N., Smith A. H., Hopenhayn-Rich C. Arsenic ingestion and internal cancers: a review. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Mar 1;135(5):462–476. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakely T. A., Woodward A. J. Ecological effects in multi-level studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 May;54(5):367–374. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.5.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan N. Y., Ebi K. L., Smith F., Wilson T. F., Smith A. E. An integrated assessment framework for climate change and infectious diseases. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107(5):329–337. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diez-Roux A. V. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb;88(2):216–222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.2.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diez-Roux A. V., Nieto F. J., Muntaner C., Tyroler H. A., Comstock G. W., Shahar E., Cooper L. S., Watson R. L., Szklo M. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Jul 1;146(1):48–63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finette B. A., O'Neill J. P., Vacek P. M., Albertini R. J. Gene mutations with characteristic deletions in cord blood T lymphocytes associated with passive maternal exposure to tobacco smoke. Nat Med. 1998 Oct;4(10):1144–1151. doi: 10.1038/2640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodman R. A., Buehler J. W., Koplan J. P. The epidemiologic field investigation: science and judgment in public health practice. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jul;132(1):9–16. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hales S., Weinstein P., Souares Y., Woodward A. El Niño and the dynamics of vectorborne disease transmission. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Feb;107(2):99–102. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9910799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harvey T., Mahaffey K. R., Velazquez S., Dourson M. Holistic risk assessment: an emerging process for environmental decisions. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995 Oct;22(2):110–117. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1995.1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunter D. J. The future of molecular epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):S1012–S1014. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ije.a019903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Janssen N. A., de Hartog J. J., Hoek G., Brunekreef B., Lanki T., Timonen K. L., Pekkanen J. Personal exposure to fine particulate matter in elderly subjects: relation between personal, indoor, and outdoor concentrations. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Jul;50(7):1133–1143. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koivusalo M., Pukkala E., Vartiainen T., Jaakkola J. J., Hakulinen T. Drinking water chlorination and cancer-a historical cohort study in Finland. Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Mar;8(2):192–200. doi: 10.1023/a:1018420229802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Jan 15;133(2):144–153. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McMichael A. J. From hazard to habitat: rethinking environment and health. Epidemiology. 1999 Jul;10(4):460–464. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199907000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McMichael A. J. Prisoners of the proximate: loosening the constraints on epidemiology in an age of change. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 May 15;149(10):887–897. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McMichael A. J. Setting environmental exposure standards: the role of the epidemiologist. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):10–16. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McMichael A. J. The health of persons, populations, and planets: epidemiology comes full circle. Epidemiology. 1995 Nov;6(6):633–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morgenstern H., Thomas D. Principles of study design in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec;101 (Suppl 4):23–38. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neutra R. R. Counterpoint from a cluster buster. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jul;132(1):1–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neutra R. R., Trichopoulos D. The place of epidemiology in environmental decisions: needed support for the development of risk assessment policy. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec;101 (Suppl 4):67–69. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pearce N. Epidemiology as a population science. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):S1015–S1018. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ije.a019904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pearce N., McKinlay J. B. Dissent: Back to the future in epidemiology and public health: response to Dr. Gori. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Aug;51(8):643–649. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pearce N., Pekkanen J., Beasley R. How much asthma is really attributable to atopy? Thorax. 1999 Mar;54(3):268–272. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.3.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pearce N. Traditional epidemiology, modern epidemiology, and public health. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):678–683. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pearce N., de Sanjose S., Boffetta P., Kogevinas M., Saracci R., Savitz D. Limitations of biomarkers of exposure in cancer epidemiology. Epidemiology. 1995 Mar;6(2):190–194. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199503000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Potter J. D. Reconciling the epidemiology, physiology, and molecular biology of colon cancer. JAMA. 1992 Sep 23;268(12):1573–1577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rothman K. J. A sobering start for the cluster busters' conference. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jul;132(1 Suppl):S6–13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rothman K. J. Methodologic frontiers in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec;101 (Suppl 4):19–21. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schwartz J., Spix C., Touloumi G., Bachárová L., Barumamdzadeh T., le Tertre A., Piekarksi T., Ponce de Leon A., Pönkä A., Rossi G. Methodological issues in studies of air pollution and daily counts of deaths or hospital admissions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50 (Suppl 1):S3–11. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.suppl_1.s3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Susser M. Does risk factor epidemiology put epidemiology at risk? Peering into the future. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Oct;52(10):608–611. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.10.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Susser M. Epidemiology today: 'a thought-tormented world'. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Sep;18(3):481–488. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.3.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Susser M., Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology: I. Eras and paradigms. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):668–673. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Susser M., Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):674–677. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Taubes G. Epidemiology faces its limits. Science. 1995 Jul 14;269(5221):164–169. doi: 10.1126/science.7618077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES