Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Jan;109(1):21–26. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0110921

Estuary-associated syndrome in North Carolina: an occupational prevalence study.

M Swinker 1, D Koltai 1, J Wilkins 1, K Hudnell 1, C Hall 1, D Darcey 1, K Robertson 1, D Schmechel 1, W Stopford 1, S Music 1
PMCID: PMC1242046  PMID: 11171520

Abstract

Atlantic coast estuaries recently have experienced fish kills and fish with lesions attributed to Pfiesteria piscicida and related dinoflagellates. Human health effects have been reported from laboratory exposure and from a 1997 Maryland fish kill. North Carolina has recorded Pfiesteria-related fish kill events over the past decade, but human health effects from environmental exposure have not been systematically investigated or documented here. At the request of the state health agency, comprehensive examinations were conducted in a cross-sectional prevalence study of watermen working where Pfiesteria exposure may occur: waters where diseased or stressed fish were reported from June to September 1997, and where Pfiesteria had been identified in the past. Controls worked on unaffected waterways. The study was conducted 3 months after the last documented Pfiesteria-related fish kill. The goal was to document any persistent health effects from recent or remote contact with fish kills, fish with lesions, or affected waterways, using the 1997 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case description for estuary-associated syndrome (EAS). Examinations included comprehensive medical, occupational, and environmental history, general medical, dermatologic, and neurologic examinations, vision testing, and neuropsychologic evaluations. Seventeen of 22 watermen working in affected waters and 11 of 21 in unaffected waters reported exposure to a fish kill or to fish with lesions. We found no pattern of abnormalities on medical, neurologic, neuropsychologic, or NES-2 evaluation. By history, one subject in each group met the EAS criteria, neither of whom had significant neuropsychological impairment when examined. Watermen from affected waterways had a significant reduction in visual contrast sensitivity (VCS) at the midspatial frequencies, but we did not identify a specific factor or exposure associated with this reduction. The cohorts did not differ in reported occupational exposure to solvents (qualitative) or to other neurotoxicants; however, exposure history was not sufficiently detailed to measure or control for solvent exposure. This small prevalence study in watermen, conducted 3 months after the last documented fish kill related to Pfiesteria, did not identify an increased risk of estuary-associated syndrome in those working on affected waterways. A significant difference between the estuary and ocean watermen was found on VCS, which could not be attributed to any specific factor or exposure. VCS may be affected by chemicals, drugs, alcohol, and several developmental and degenerative conditions; it has not been validated as being affected by known exposure to dinoflagellate secretions. VCS should be considered for inclusion in further studies, together with documentation or quantification of its potential confounders, to assess whether it has utility in relationship to dinoflagellate exposure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anger W. K., Letz R., Chrislip D. W., Frumkin H., Hudnell K., Russo J. M., Chappell W., Hutchinson L. Neurobehavioral test methods for environmental health studies of adults. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):489–497. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(94)90128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold I. M., Dufresne R. M., Alleyne B. C., Stuart P. J. Health implication of occupational exposures to hydrogen sulfide. J Occup Med. 1985 May;27(5):373–376. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198505000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burkholder J. M., Noga E. J., Hobbs C. H., Glasgow H. B., Jr, Smith S. A. New 'phantom' dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills. Nature. 1992 Jul 30;358(6385):407–410. doi: 10.1038/358407a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fiedler N., Feldman R. G., Jacobson J., Rahill A., Wetherell A. The assessment of neurobehavioral toxicity: SGOMSEC joint report. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Apr;104 (Suppl 2):179–191. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glasgow H. B., Jr, Burkholder J. M., Schmechel D. E., Tester P. A., Rublee P. A. Insidious effects of a toxic estuarine dinoflagellate on fish survival and human health. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1995 Dec;46(4):501–522. doi: 10.1080/15287399509532051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Glasgow H. B., Jr, Burkholder J. M., Schmechel D. E., Tester P. A., Rublee P. A. Insidious effects of a toxic estuarine dinoflagellate on fish survival and human health. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1995 Dec;46(4):501–522. doi: 10.1080/15287399509532051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Golub J. E., Haselow D. T., Hageman J. C., Lopez A. S., Oldach D. W., Grattan L. M., Perl T. M. Pfiesteria in Maryland: preliminary epidemiologic findings. Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):137–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Golub J. E., Haselow D. T., Hageman J. C., Lopez A. S., Oldach D. W., Grattan L. M., Perl T. M. Pfiesteria in Maryland: preliminary epidemiologic findings. Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):137–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grattan L. M., Oldach D., Perl T. M., Lowitt M. H., Matuszak D. L., Dickson C., Parrott C., Shoemaker R. C., Kauffman C. L., Wasserman M. P. Learning and memory difficulties after environmental exposure to waterways containing toxin-producing Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates. Lancet. 1998 Aug 15;352(9127):532–539. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02132-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levin E. D., Schmechel D. E., Burkholder J. B., Deamer-Melia N. J., Moser V. C., Harry G. J. Persisting learning deficits in rats after exposure to Pfiesteria piscicida. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Dec;105(12):1320–1325. doi: 10.1289/ehp.971051320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lowitt M. H., Kauffman C. L. Pfiesteria and the skin: a practical update for the clinician. Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):124–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oldach D., Brown E., Rublee P. Strategies for environmental monitoring of toxin producing phantom dinoflagellates in the Chesapeake. Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):113–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tross S., Price R. W., Navia B., Thaler H. T., Gold J., Hirsch D. A., Sidtis J. J. Neuropsychological characterization of the AIDS dementia complex: a preliminary report. AIDS. 1988 Apr;2(2):81–88. doi: 10.1097/00002030-198804000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wachler B. S., Krueger R. R. Normalized contrast sensitivity values. J Refract Surg. 1998 Jul-Aug;14(4):463–466. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19980701-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES